Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ritical porosity
However, this equation predicts a finite strength even as porosity approaches 1.0. More realistic forms must be
used so that strength vanishes at some porosity c. This limiting porosity was shown as a crossover porosity
from rock to a slurry by Raymer et al.[2] and was referred to as "critical porosity" elsewhere. Jizba [3] used such a
concept to derive a general strength relationship for sandstones:
....................(4)
where and n are the shear and normal stresses at failure.
The 0.36 within the parentheses is her presumed value for c. Notice, however, that this form indicates that
sandstones have no tensile or cohesive strength. We can obtain a better result by using Jizbas relationship at
elevated confining pressure (say, 50 MPa), where it is more valid, and recasting the trend in terms of 'Eq. 2, as
we did for the Scott relation.[4] Dobereiner and DeFreitas[5] measured several weak sandstones, and their results
suggest that critical porosity is approximately 0.42. Using this critical porosity, we derive a uniaxial compressive
strength
....................(5)
This C0 equation is plotted in Fig. 2 along with the modified Scott[6] and Jizba[3] equations and data of Dobereiner
and DeFreitas.[5]
Compaction strength
After a threshold region the rock begins to show ductile deformation under confining pressure. The pressure
under which a rock deforms is known as its compaction strength.
In Fig. 3, at some elevated stress or confining pressure, the rock will begin to show ductile deformation. The
grain structure begins to collapse, and the rock will compact and lose porosity. This compaction strength, Cc, is
itself a function of porosity as well as mineralogy, diagenesis, and texture. In Figs. 4a and 4b, the behavior of
two rocks under hydrostatic pressure is shown. The high-porosity (33%) sandstone (Fig. 4a) has a low "crush"
strength of about 55 MPa. With a lower porosity of 19%, Berea sandstone has a much higher strength of 440
MPa (Fig. 4b). Notice that in both Figs. 4a and 4b, permanent deformation remains even after the stress is
released. This hysteresis demonstrates the damage to the matrix structure caused by exceeding the crush
strength.
b.
s = (1 - 3)sin(2)
b.
n = (1 + 3) - (1 - 3)cos(2)