Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Details
This paper is broadly divided into four sections. The first section of the
paper attempts to analyze Italy’s trade structure and establish any
significant trends in trade flows in the previous years.
In the second section these trends are analyzed with respect to Italy’s
trade structure vis-à-vis the European Union, developing countries and
the other developed countries such as the USA. Here an attempt is
made to establish a trade portfolio keeping in mind the dominant
trends identified in the first part of the analysis. A negotiation schedule
is then worked out to maximize advantage to Italy from trade flows.
The final part of the analysis contains the resolutions that were
discussed, debated and finally accepted in the conference. It is
heartening to note that the drafted resolution aid in establishment of
the portfolio recommended in the second part of the analysis
Table of Contents
V. References
I. SNAPSHOT ITALY TRADE POLICY
EU leads the world ranking w.r.t to the trade in services followed by the
US. Together, these two economies account for some 50 per cent of
world exports and 43 per cent of world imports of services.
During the last year EU’s share of exports remained stable, while its
share of imports declined; with an appreciable improvement in the
surplus.
The rate of increase in import prices declined from 7.6 to 2.3 per cent,
held down by the strengthening of the euro and by the deceleration,
on an average annual basis, in commodity prices. However, commodity
prices headed sharply upwards again in the final part of the year and
the first few months of 2008, again increasing the burden of imports.
And here is where the opportunity lies for Italy. Italy as a nation is
perceived as a cultural rich country (wine and food!). Developing
countries at the same time with their presence growing into the trade
portfolio are an ideal position for exchange of trade services under
mode 4.The takeaway for this would be a relaxation in trade in
educational services which are perceived to be in higher
demand for such countries again under mode 4.
Market access, the term was not at all used in GATT. In GATS, however
it covers the service sectors scheduled by the member nations in
addition to specified quantitative forms of restrictions as
prohibited for these sectors. GATS, however does not include any
export related provisions that may potentially constrain a member
nations ability to either restrict or promote supplies. Also trade
mechanisms such as anti dumping measures, safeguards are
conspicuous by absences which were evoked with a rather high
frequency in GATT. Finally, rules governing domestic regulations are
weak. This in turn varies the level of member nation’s
commitments, as well as introduces variance on account of
domestic factors such as region specific political sensitivities.
4) Energy Services
5. Environmental Services
• WTO Website