You are on page 1of 6

International Journal of Recent Advancement in Engineering & Research

Volume 2, Issue 5 May; -2016

DATA COLLECTION IN WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORKS


Shubham 1, Rakhi2
Sree Chitra Thirunal College of Engineering
Abstract-- A remote sensor system is a PC system that comprises of little gadgets called sensor
hubs. These sensor hubs can sense distinctive natural conditions like temperature, weight, and so on.
All these sensor hubs send their information to a focal hub or base station. This makes an extensive
correspondence overhead the vitality hotspot for these hubs is generally a battery. This offers ascend
to enormous utilization of vitality and assets. So an answer is required that defeats the above issues.
Information total is one of its answers. This technique comprises of aggregators that consolidate the
information originating from the sensor hubs and after that passes it to the base station. With the
assistance of information accumulation we diminish the vitality utilization by taking out excess and
we can improve the life time of remote system. The motivation behind the proposed paper is to
clarify information conglomeration in remote sensor organize, how it works, distinctive methods of
information collection and the correlation among them.
I. INTRODUCTION
A Wireless Sensor Network (WSN) regularly comprises of a sink hub at times alluded to as a Base
Station and various little remote sensor hubs. The base station is thought to be secure with boundless
accessible vitality while the sensor hubs are thought to be unsecured with restricted accessible
vitality. The sensor hubs screen a geological range and gather tangible data. Tactile data is imparted
to the Base Station through Wireless jump by bounce transmissions. To preserve vitality this data is
amassed at transitional sensor hubs by applying an appropriate total capacity on the got information.
Collection decreases the measure of system activity which diminishes vitality utilization on sensor
nodes.[1] It however confounds the effectively existing security challenges for remote sensor
networks[2] and requires new security procedures customized particularly for this situation. Giving
security to total information in Wireless Sensor Networks is known as Secure Data Aggregation in
WSN.[1][2][3] were the initial few works talking about procedures for secure information collection
in Wireless Sensor Networks.
The remote sensor system is specially appointed system. It comprise little light weighted remote
hubs called sensor hubs, sent in physical or ecological condition. What's more, it quantified physical
parameters, for example, sound, weight, temperature, and moistness.
The key preferred standpoint of utilizing these little gadgets to screen the earth is that it doesn't
require framework, for example, electric mains for power supply and wired lines for Internet
associations with gather information, nor require human communication while sending. Every gadget
is furnished with a radio handset, a little microcontroller, and a vitality source, typically a battery.
The gadgets utilize each other to transport information.
Remote sensor arrange have different applications like territory checking, building observing,
wellbeing checking, military survival spear and target following. These sensor hubs conveyed in
huge or thousand numbers and team up to frame a specially appointed system equipped for
answering to information gathering sink (base station).so they have constrained computational power
and restricted memory and battery control, this prompts expanded intricacy for application designers
and frequently brings about applications that are firmly combined with system conventions. Remote
sensor systems (WSN) offer an inexorably Sensor hubs require less power for handling when
contrasted with transmitting information. It is desirable over do in system preparing inside system
and decrease bundle estimate. One such approach is information collection that permits assembling

23

International Journal of Recent Advancement in Engineering & Research


Volume 2, Issue 5 May; -2016

and total information in a vitality proficient way so that system lifetime is upgraded.

Figure 1 Basic Components of a WSN Node

II. CLUSTERING IN WSN [5]


Sensor hub are thickly sent in remote sensor arrange that implies physical environment would deliver
fundamentally the same as information in near to sensor hub and transmitting such sort of
information is pretty much excess. So every one of these certainties empower utilizing some sort of
collection of sensor hubs with the end goal that gathering of sensor hub can be consolidated or pack
information together and transmit just minimized information. This gathering procedure of sensor
hubs into a joined huge scale sensor hub is known as bunching.
The insightful approach to consolidate and pack the information having a place with a solitary bunch
is known as information conglomeration. Taking after are a few issues of bunching in remote sensor
systems:1.
How numerous groups ought to be framed?
2.
How numerous sensor hubs ought to be taken in a solitary Cluster?
3.
Selection technique of group head in an individual bunch.
4.
User can put some power full hubs, in term of vitality in the system which can carry on like
group head and basic hub in a bunch fill in as a group part as it were.
III. PROBLEM DEFINITION
In remote sensor arrange, information transmission occurred in multi-jump form where every hub
advances its information to the neighbor hub which is closer to sink. Since firmly set hubs may sense
same information, above approach can't be considered as vitality proficient. A change over the above
approach would bunch where every hub sends information to group head (CH) and afterward group
head perform collection on the got crude information and after that send it to sink. Performing
collection work over group head still causes critical vitality wastage.[4] Performing conglomeration
work over bunch head still causes noteworthy vitality wastage. If there should be an occurrence of

24

International Journal of Recent Advancement in Engineering & Research


Volume 2, Issue 5 May; -2016

homogeneous sensor arrange bunch take will soon cease to exist and again re-grouping must be done
which again cause vitality utilization.
IV. AN OVERVIEW ABOUT DATA AGGREGATION
In run of the mill remote sensor systems, sensor hubs are normally asset obliged and batteryrestricted. To spare assets and vitality, information must be accumulated. There has been broad work
on information accumulation conspires in sensor systems. Information total is a procedure of
collecting the sensor information utilizing total methodologies. Taking after figure 2 demonstrates
fundamental collection in remote sensor systems.
The remote sensor arrange has comprised three sorts of hubs. 1. Basic normal sensor hubs, 2.
Aggregator hub, 3. Querier hub. Normal sensor hubs sense information parcel from the earth and
send to the aggregator hubs essentially these aggregator hubs gather information from different
sensor hubs of the system, totals the information bundle utilizing a some conglomeration work like
entirety, normal, number, max min and afterward sends totals result to upper aggregator hub or the
Querier hub who produce the inquiry.

Figure 2 Basic Components of a WSN Node


The information total calculation gathers the sensor information from the sensor hub and afterward
totals at one specific hub. Diverse sort of calculations are utilized like concentrated approach,
LEACH ( Low Energy Adaptive Clustering Hierarchy), TAG( Tiny Aggregation) and so on. This
totaled information is exchange to the sink hub by selecting the effective way. The general
information collection calculation fills in as appeared in the beneath figure 3.

25

International Journal of Recent Advancement in Engineering & Research


Volume 2, Issue 5 May; -2016

V. DATA AGGREGATION APPROACHES IN WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORK


There are many types of aggregation techniques are present some of them are listed below.
5.1 Centralized Approach:
This is an address driven approach where every hub sends information to a focal hub by means of the
most limited conceivable course utilizing a multi-jump remote convention. The sensor hubs just send
the information bundles to a pioneer, which is the capable hub. The pioneer totals the information
which can be questioned. There is a transitional hub between the sensor hub and the pioneers. Every
middle hub needs to send the information bundles tended to pioneer from the tyke hubs.
5.2 In-Network Aggregation [5]:
In-network aggregation, the processes are as following:
1.

Gathering and steering data through a multi-jump organize,

2.
Processing information at moderate hubs with the target of diminishing asset utilization
(specifically vitality), along these lines expanding system lifetime.
There are two approaches for in-network aggregation [4]:
1. With size reduction and
2. Without size reduction.
With size reduction
It alludes to the way toward joining and compacting the information parcels got by a hub from its
neighbors with a specific end goal to lessen the bundle length to be transmitted or sent towards the
sink.
Without size reduction
It alludes to the procedure consolidating information bundles got from various neighbors into a
solitary information parcel yet without preparing the estimation of information.

Figure 4. without size reduction and with size reduction

26

International Journal of Recent Advancement in Engineering & Research


Volume 2, Issue 5 May; -2016

5.3 Tree-Based Approach


The tree based approach is characterizing accumulation from developing a conglomeration tree. The
type of tree is least crossing tree, sink hub think about as a root and source hubs consider as clears
out. Data streaming of information begin from surrenders hub over to root implies sink (base
station).This approach works in two stages:
1. Distributed phase
2. Collection phase
Hindrance of this approach is that information parcel misfortune at any level of tree, the information
will be lost for single level as well as for entire related sub tree also.
5.4 CLUSTER-BASED APPROACH [4]:
In bunch based approach, entire system is partitioned into a few groups. Every group has a bunch
head which is chosen among bunch individuals. Group heads do the part of aggregator which total
information got from bunch individuals locally and after that transmit the outcome to sink. The group
heads can speak with the sink specifically by means of long range transmissions or multi bouncing
through other bunch heads.
Different data aggregation technique in wireless sensor networks
Algorithm
Type
Advantages
TAG
Tree Based
Ability
to
tolerate
disconnections and loss
SPIN
Centralized
Simple in nature, implosion,
avoidance and economic start
up cost.
DD
Centralized
It extends the network
lifetime.
LEACH
Cluster Based
Low
energy,
increased
lifetime of network
HEED
Cluster Based
Improved energy efficiency

DRINA

In Network

M- DRINA

In Network

Disadvantages
Network life time is limited.
No feedback mechanism for
delivery of the data

It cannot be used for


continuous data delivery.
It is not used for large network
region.
No Support for heterogeneous
node. Lifetime of sensor node
is limited.
Data security, Low energy.
Cluster Head dynamically not
changes.
Achieves
more
energy No Support, Not applicable for
efficiency than DRINA and large network region.
increase the lifetime of
network
with
dynamic
selection of cluster head.

VI. PROS AND CONS OF DATA AGGREGATION IN WIRELESS SENSOR


NETWORK

With the assistance of information accumulation prepare we can upgrade the power and
exactness of data which is gotten by whole system, certain repetition exists in the information
gathered from sensor hubs accordingly information combination handling is expected to lessen the
excess data.

27

International Journal of Recent Advancement in Engineering & Research


Volume 2, Issue 5 May; -2016

The number of transmission is diminished so the activity is decreased

Load and moderate vitality of the sensors.

The bunch head implies information aggregator hubs send combine these information to the
base station .this group head or aggregator hub might be assaulted by noxious aggressor. In the event
that a group head is traded off, then the base station (sink) can't be guarantee the accuracy of the total
information that has been send to it.

Another downside is existing frameworks are a few duplicates of the total result might be
sent to the base station (sink) by uncompromised hubs .It increment the power devoured at these
hubs.
VII. CONCLUSION
In this paper we have learned about remote sensor organize. It contains vast number of sensor hubs
Wireless sensor systems are vitality obliged organize. That is the reason lifetime of the system is
restricted so the different methodologies or convention has been proposed for expanding the lifetime
of the remote sensor organize. Since the vast majority of the vitality expended for transmitting and
getting information, the procedure of information accumulation turns into an imperative issue.
Productive information collections give vitality preservation as well as expel repetition information
and subsequently give helpful information as it were. We likewise talk about the favorable position
and detriments of the information total.
REFERENCES
[1] Cam, H; Ozdemir, S Nair, P Muthuavinashiappan, D (October 2003). "ESPDA: Energy-efficient and Secure Patternbased Data Aggregation for wireless sensor networks". Sensors 2: 732736.
[2] Hu, Lingxuan; David Evans (January 2003). "Secure aggregation for wireless networks" Workshop on Security and
Assurance in Ad hoc Networks.
[3] Przydatek, Bartosz; Dawn Song; Adrian Perrig (2003). "SIA: secure information aggregation in sensor networks".
SenSys: 255265.
[4] Kiran
Maraiya,
Kamal
Kant,
Nitin
Gupta
,Wireless Sensor Network: A Review on Data
Aggregation,International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research Volume 2, Issue 4, April -2011 ISSN 22295518 IJSER 2011
[5] Nandini. S. Patil, Prof. P. R. Patil, Data Aggregation in Wireless Sensor Network, 2010 IEEE International
Conference on Computational Intelligence and Computing Research.

28

You might also like