Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Purpose
Purpose of this document is to provide solution for 2D Truss for
weight optimization and material properties.
DISCUSSION ........................................................................................................................................... 21
CONCLUSION ......................................................................................................................................... 22
II
III
1
1
2
6
11
14
IV
1 Problem Statement
Assessment of a 2D truss structure with 7 members and 5 connecting points. There are two possible
configurations of this truss system.
1.1
First Configuration
Figure 1-1 Truss Configuration 1
1.2
2nd Configuration
Figure 1-2 Truss Configuration 2
Purpose is to select appropriate cross section using discrete method and Matlab Programming method.
Stress, strain and overall performance of the structures will be evaluated and a comparison will made.
1.3
Material Properties
Material properties used for the given truss members are shown in Table below
1.4
Mild Steel
200000 MPa
0.27
7860 kg/m3
250 MPa
Assumption
Following assumption have been made for calculation of cross sectional area of the truss.
Max. Deflection at any node 5mm
Factor of safety for the truss system 2
2 Mathematical Modeling
2.1
Frist Configuration
The free body diagram showing the nodal degrees of freedom, element notations, forces and boundary
conditions.
Where
A = cross sectional area of truss element.
E = Youngs modulus.
L = length of truss element.
c = cosine of angle formed by that truss element.
s = sine of angle formed by that truss element.
25
0
6
k1 10
25
0 25 0
0 0 0
0 25 0
0 0 0
0 0
0 33
6
k2 10
0 0
0 33
0
0 33
0 0
0 33
0
25
0
6
k3 10
25
0 25 0
0 0 0
0 25 0
0 0 0
33
0
6
k4 10
33
0 33 0
0 0 0
0 33 0
0 0 0
-11785113
-11785113
11785113
11785113
11785113
11785113
-11785113
-11785113
0 0
0 33
6
k6 10
0 0
0 33
0
0 33
0 0
0 33
11785113
-11785113
k5
-11785113
11785113
12800000
-9600000
k7
-12800000
9600000
11785113
-11785113
-11785113
11785113
-9600000
-12800000
7200000
9600000
9600000
12800000
-7200000
-9600000
9600000
-7200000
-9600000
7200000
All these elemental stiffness matrics are combined to make the global stinffnes matrix as given below.
0
0
0
0
-9.6
0
0
0
0
k gs 106
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-11.8 11.8
0
11.8 -11.8
0
40.5
-33.3
-33.3
-11.8 11.8
-33.3
11.8 -11.8
0
0
0
-7.2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
45.1
-11.8
0
-11.8
11.8
0
9.6
0
0
0
0
Fa
0
0
0
0
10000
The nodal displacement matrix
by following equation
Fa k gsU
Where
is nodal displacement matrix given by
U T u1 u2
u3
u4
u5
u6
u7
u8
u9
u10
U k gs1Fa
By using the MATLAB code written for configuration 1. Following results have been obtained.
Nodal deflections are given in mm units.
2nd Configuration
Figure 2-3 Free body diagram of Configuration 2
From Node
1
2
3
To Node
2
3
4
11
4
5
2
5
5
1
4
2
11785113
-11785113
k3
-11785113
11785113
25
0
k1 106
25
0 25 0
0 0 0
0 25 0
0 0 0
33
0
k2 106
33
0 33 0
0 0 0
0 33 0
0 0 0
-11785113
-11785113
11785113
11785113
11785113
11785113
-11785113
-11785113
25
0
6
k4 10
25
0 25 0
0 0 0
0 25 0
0 0 0
0 0
0 33
6
k5 10
0 0
0 33
0
0 33
0 0
0 33
0 0
0 33
k6 106
0 0
0 33
0
0 33
0 0
0 33
11785113
-11785113
-11785113
11785113
12
12800000
-9600000
k7
-12800000
9600000
-9600000
-12800000
7200000
9600000
9600000
12800000
-7200000
-9600000
9600000
-7200000
-9600000
7200000
All these elemental stiffness matrics are combined to make the global stinffnes matrix as given below.
0
0
-25
0
0
k gs 106
0
0
0
0
33.3
71.1
-9.6
-33.3
-12.8
-9.6
40.5
-33.3
9.6
-33.3
45.1
11.8
-11.8
11.8 -11.8
-11.8 -11.8
11.8
0
-33.3
9.6
-7.2
0
0
0
0
0
0
Fa
100000
0
The nodal displacement matrix
by following equation
Fa k gsU
Where
Is nodal displacement matrix given by
13
u3
u4
u5
u6
u7
u8
u9
u10
U k gs1Fa
By using the MATLAB code written for configuration 1. Following results have been obtained.
Nodal deflections are given in mm units.
T 70 100 141 0 0 22 37
14
19
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Length
Config. 1
(mm)
800
600
848.53
800
600
600
1000
Length
Config. 2
(mm)
800
600
848.53
800
600
600
1000
x-sectional Area of
elements (m2)
0.0001
0.0001
0.0001
0.0001
0.0001
0.0001
0.0001
Table 4-1 shows that both configurations are numbered in such a way that numbering in similar
for both the configurations to simplify the comparison.
Stresses in elements for both configurations are tabulated below for all elements.
Table 4-2 Comparison of stresses in elements for both configuration
Element
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Negative sign in values against stress show the compressive stresses and no sign show the
tensile stresses.
20
Table 4-3 shows a comparison between strains in elements for both the configurations. The
negative sign shows the compressive strain and values without sign are for tensile strain. From
table it is evident that peak strain is same for both the configurations though configuration 2 has
tensile strain and configuration 1 has compressive strain at peak value. Based on this analysis
configuration 1 seems more stable than configuration 2.
5 Discussion
Matlab codes are written for both the truss configurations and boundary conditions and forces
are applied as mentioned in problem statements. The results are obtained for stresses, strains in
all elements and results are given in previous sections.
From results its evident that both configurations show similar peak stress and strain values,
however configuration 1 shows peak values in compression and configuration 2 shows values in
tension.
Based on truss stability rules, elements loaded in compression are stiffer as compared to those in
tension. Based on this fact, configuration 1 looks more suitable for the problem in hand.
21
6 Conclusion
Cross section is decided on the bases of factor of study for sections. The design factor of safety
is kept above 1.5. Peak stresses in our cases while keeping the section 100mm2(square solid rod)
is 141 MPa. Which give 1.7 Factor of Safety? The section is standard.
Configuration 1 is more suitable than configuration 2 for given loading and boundary
conditions.
22