Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Revision Code: 00
Department of Education
Name
District
MINNIE A. CUADRA
LABANGAN I
Station
Division
Grade VI
Subjects Taught
Position Title
Parenthetical Title
Office Unit
Reports to
Position Supervised
Teacher III
Salary Grade
Effectivity Date
Page/s
JOB SUMMARY
QUALIFICATION STANDARDS
A. CSC Prescribed Qualifications
Education Bachelor of Elementary/Secondary/Early Childhood Education or Bachelor's degree plus 18 professional unit in Education
Experience None required
Eligibility RA 1080
Trainings None required
B. Preferred Qualifications
Education BSE/BSEEd/College Graduate with education units (18-21), MA units 18 units
Experience
Eligibility PBET/LET Passers
Revision Code: 00
MFOs
CHOKEY SORIANO
Teacher - 8
JUNE 2016 - MARCH 2017
LABANGAN CENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, LABANGAN DISTRICT I, DIVISION OF ZAMBOANGA DEL
TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING
KRAs
1. Teaching-Learning
Process (40%)
OBJECTIVES
1.1 Prepared Daily Lesson
Logs in all subjects following
the curriculum guide
TIME LINE
June 2016 March 2016
1.2 Prepared 15 instructional June 2016 materials integrating ICT in all March 2017
subjects per quarter
Basic Education
Services
2. Pupils/ Student
Outcomes (30%)
#RSH#
2.1 Monitored, evaluated and June 2016 maintained 35 pupils/students' April 2017
report of progress within the
rating period
Name of Rater:
Position
Date of Review:
Weight
per KRA
Quality
20% 5 - Outstanding
Efficiency
Timeliness
5 - Outstanding
33-35 pupils got quarterly grade of 75% and better
5 - Outstanding
95% - 100% of all lesson logs were submitted for checking before the checking
schedule to the school head
4 - Very Satisfactory
85% - 94% of all lesson logs had all the complete parts (Objectives,
Content, Learning Resources, Procedures, Remarks & Reflections)
4 - Very Satisfactory
4 - Very Satisfactory
85% - 94% of all lesson logs were submitted for checking before the checking
schedule to the school head
3 - Satisfactory
75%-84% of all lesson logs had all the complete parts (Objectives,
Content, Learning Resources, Procedures, Remarks & Reflections)
3 - Satisfactory
26-29 pupils got quarterly grade of 75% and better
3 - Satisfactory
75% - 84% of all lesson logs were submitted for checking before the checking
schedule to the school head
2 - Unsatisfactory
51%-74% of all lesson logs had all the complete parts (Objectives,
Content, Learning Resources, Procedures, Remarks & Reflections)
2 - Unsatisfactory
2 - Unsatisfactory
51% - 74% of all lesson logs were submitted for checking before the checking
schedule to the school head
1 - Poor
50% and below of all lesson logs had all the complete parts
(Objectives, Content, Learning Resources, Procedures, Remarks &
Reflections)
1 - Poor
0-17 pupils got quarterly grade of 75% and better
95% - 100% of all lesson logs had all the complete parts (Objectives,
Content, Learning Resources, Procedures, Remarks & Reflections)
10% 5 - Outstanding
5 - Outstanding
95% -100% of all ICT-integrated instructional materials were submitted to be
check by the school head one week after the end of the quarter
4 - Very Satisfactory
4 - Very Satisfactory
Prepared and used 5-10 instructional materials that integrated ICT per 32-33 pupils got quarterly grade of 75% and better
quarter
4 - Very Satisfactory
85% -94% of all ICT-integrated instructional materials were submitted to be
check by the school head one week after the end of the quarter
3 - Satisfactory
2 - Unsatisfactory
Prepared and used 2-3 instructional materials that integrated ICT per
quarter
2 - Unsatisfactory
1 - Poor
Prepared and used 1 and less instructional materials that integrated
ICT per quarter
1 - Poor
10% 5 - Outstanding
RATING
SCORE*
Q
Ave.
3 - Satisfactory
75%-84% of all ICT-integrated instructional materials were submitted to be check
by the school head one week after the end of the quarter
2 - Unsatisfactory
51%-74% of all ICT-integrated instructional materials were submitted to be check
by the school head one week after the end of the quarter
1 - Poor
50% and Below of all ICT-integrated instructional materials were submitted to be
check by the school head one week after the end of the quarter
5 - Outstanding
5 - Outstanding
10 or more pupils who needed disciplinary interventions were identified Zero (0)-1 identified pupil was reported and found guilty of violating the
school's policies on child protection and the classroom's rules and norms
of behaviors
The school's policies on child protection and the classroom's rules and norms of
behaviors were introduced and explained to the pupils within 1 week after the
beginning of the classes
4 - Very Satisfactory
4 - Very Satisfactory
4 - Very Satisfactory
2-5 of identified pupils was reported and found guilty of violating the
school's policies on child protection and the classroom's rules and norms
of behaviors
The school's policies on child protection and the classroom's rules and norms of
behaviors were introduced and explained to the pupils within 2 weeks after the
beginning of the classes
3 - Satisfactory
3 - Satisfactory
3 - Satisfactory
11-15 pupils were reported and found guilty of violating the school's
policies on child protection and the classroom's rules and norms of
behaviors
The school's policies on child protection and the classroom's rules and norms of
behaviors were introduced and explained to the pupils within 3 weeks after the
beginning of the classes
2 - Unsatisfactory
2 - Unsatisfactory
2 - Unsatisfactory
5-9 pupils were reported and found guilty of violating the school's policies The school's policies on child protection and the classroom's rules and norms of
on child protection and the classroom's rules and norms of behaviors
behaviors were introduced and explained to the pupils within 4 weeks after the
beginning of the classes
1 - Poor
1 - Poor
1 - Poor
21 and more pupils were reported and found guilty of violating the
school's policies on child protection and the classroom's rules and norms
of behaviors
The school's policies on child protection and the classroom's rules and norms of
behaviors were never introduced and explained to the pupils
5 - Outstanding
5 - Outstanding
10% 5 - Outstanding
ACTUAL
RESULTS
1 - Poor
50% and below of all lesson logs were submitted for checking before the
checking schedule to the school head
5 - Outstanding
Prepared and used 10-15 instructional materials that integrated ICT per 33-35 pupils got quarterly grade of 75% and better
quarter
3 - Satisfactory
Prepared and used 3-5 instructional materials that integrated ICT per
quarter
HELEN P. MABINI
ESP - I
0.40
MFOs
KRAs
2. Pupils/ Student
Outcomes (30%)
OBJECTIVES
TIME LINE
2.1 Monitored, evaluated and June 2016 maintained 35 pupils/students' April 2017
report of progress within the
rating period
Basic Education
Services
2.2 Identified and monitored 10 June 2016 April 2017
learners' individual
performances every quarter
and conducted remediation for
learners at risk of failing
PERFROMANCE INDICATORS
Weight
per KRA
Quality
Report of progress of pupils were given to parents within 15 working days after
the submission of grades from subject teachers
4 - Very Satisfactory
4 - Very Satisfactory
4 - Very Satisfactory
Report of progress of pupils were given to parents within 20 working days after
the submission of grades from subject teachers
3 - Satisfactory
3 - Satisfactory
3 - Satisfactory
Report of progress of pupils were given to parents within 25 working days after
the submission of grades from subject teachers
2 - Unsatisfactory
2 - Unsatisfactory
2 - Unsatisfactory
Report of progress of pupils were given to parents within 30 working days after
the submission of grades from subject teachers
1 - Poor
1 - Poor
1 - Poor
Report of progress of pupils were given to parents within 35 or later working days
after the submission of grades from subject teachers
5 - Outstanding
5 - Outstanding
4 - Very Satisfactory
4 - Very Satisfactory
3 - Satisfactory
3 - Satisfactory
2 - Unsatisfactory
2 - Unsatisfactory
2 - Unsatisfactory
1 - Poor
1 - Poor
4 - Very Satisfactory
4 - Very Satisfactory
3 - Satisfactory
3 - Satisfactory
2 - Unsatisfactory
2 - Unsatisfactory
1 - Poor
1 - Poor
5 - Outstanding
5 - Outstanding
Home visitations was done 3 months before the end of school year
4 - Very Satisfactory
4 - Very Satisfactory
Home visitations was done 2 months before the end of school year
3 - Satisfactory
3 - Satisfactory
Home visitations was done 1 month before the end of school year
2 - Unsatisfactory
2 - Unsatisfactory
Home visitations was done 15 days before the end of school year
1 - Poor
1 - Poor
3. Community
Involvement (15%)
Basic Education
Services
#RSH#
5% 5 - Outstanding
5%
5 - Outstanding
10% 5 - Outstanding
Timeliness
10% 5 - Outstanding
Efficiency
ACTUAL
RESULTS
RATING
SCORE*
Q
Ave.
0.40
MFOs
Basic Education
Services
KRAs
OBJECTIVES
TIME LINE
Basic Education
Services
PERFROMANCE INDICATORS
Weight
per KRA
Quality
Efficiency
Zero (0) parent of pupils needing academic monitoring/follow-up were 50% and below of the purpose for the visit was realized
visited
5 - Outstanding
Undertaken, initiated and/or participated in 5 or more projects/ events/ Fundraised Php 4,001 and more
activities within the rating period
4 - Very Satisfactory
4 - Very Satisfactory
4 - Very Satisfactory
3 - Satisfactory
3 - Satisfactory
3 - Satisfactory
2 - Unsatisfactory
2 - Unsatisfactory
2 - Unsatisfactory
1 - Poor
1 - Poor
1 - Poor
5% 5 - Outstanding
5% 5 - Outstanding
5 - Outstanding
5 - Outstanding
4 - Very Satisfactory
4 - Very Satisfactory
4 - Very Satisfactory
Attended 4 seminars/trainings/workshops
3 - Satisfactory
3 - Satisfactory
3 - Satisfactory
Attended 3 seminars/trainings/workshops
2 - Unsatisfactory
2 - Unsatisfactory
2 - Unsatisfactory
1 - Poor
1 - Poor
1 - Poor
5% 5 - Outstanding
5 - Outstanding
5 - Outstanding
Organized/Initiated/Served as Facilitator/Resource
Person/Coordinator/Chairman
Report of participation was submitted to the school head within 5 working days
from the date of the project/event/activity
4 - Very Satisfactory
4 - Very Satisfactory
4 - Very Satisfactory
Report of participation was submitted to the school head within 10 working days
from the date of the project/event/activity
3 - Satisfactory
3 - Satisfactory
3 - Satisfactory
Served as staff
Report of participation was submitted to the school head within 15 working days
from the date of the project/event/activity
2 - Unsatisfactory
2 - Unsatisfactory
2 - Unsatisfactory
Attended/Participated
Report of participation was submitted to the school head within 20 working days
from the date of the project/event/activity
1 - Poor
1 - Poor
1 - Poor
5% 5 - Outstanding
5 - Outstanding
4 - Very Satisfactory
4 - Very Satisfactory
Coached pupils/ athletes. Participants in the district level.
3 - Satisfactory
2 - Unsatisfactory
2 - Unsatisfactory
#RSH#
5 - Outstanding
Never attended/initiated/ participated in co-curricular/ school activities Did not attend/initiate/ participate in co-curricular/ school activities
Timeliness
1 - Poor
1 - Poor
Report of participation was submitted to the school head within 25 working days
or later from the date of the project/event/activity
ACTUAL
RESULTS
RATING
SCORE*
Q
Ave.
MFOs
KRAs
OBJECTIVES
TIME LINE
Weight
per KRA
PERFROMANCE INDICATORS
Quality
Efficiency
ACTUAL
RESULTS
Timeliness
RATING
SCORE*
Q
Ave.
0.80
Ratee:
Rater:
CHOKEY SORIANO
Teacher
#RSH#
Approving Officer:
HELEN P. MABINI
Elem. School Principal -I
COMPETENCIES
CORE BEHAVIORAL COMPETENCIES
Self-Management
1
Undertakes personal actions and behaviors that are clear and purposive and takes into
account personal goals and values congruent to that of the organization.
3.6
Teamwork
1
2
Displays emotional maturity and enthusiasm for and is challenged by higher goals
Prioritize work tasks and schedules (through gantt charts, checklists, etc.) to achieve
goals.
Sets high quality, challenging, realistic goals for self and others
Demonstrates the values and behavior enshrined in the Norms of Conduct and Ethical
Standards for public officials and employee (RA 6713).
Service Orientation
Practices ethical and professional behavior and conduct taking into account the impact of
his/her actions and decisions.
Acts with a sense pf urgency and responsibility to meet the organization's needs,
improves systems and help others improve their effectiveness.
3.6
2
3
4
5
Result Focus
Innovation
Achieves results with optimal use of time and resources most of the time.
Avoids rework, mistakes and wastage through effective work methods by placing
organizational needs before personal needs.
Expresses a desire to do better and may express frustration at waste or inefficiency. May
focus on new or more precise ways of meeting goals set.
4.2
4
5 - Role Model; 4 - Consistently demonstrates; 3 - Most of the time demonstrates; 2 - Sometimes demonstrates;
1 - Rare
CORE SKILLS
Oral Communication
1
1 Follows instructions accurately.
4.2
2
4
5
Written Communication
1
Knows the different written business communication formats used in the DepEd.
Writes routine correspondence/communications, narrative and descriptive report based
on ready available information data with minimal spelling or grammatical error/s (e.g.
Memos, minutes, etc.)
4
4.2
4
5 - Role Model; 4 - Consistently demonstrates; 3 - Most of the time demonstrates; 2 - Sometimes demonstrates;
Note: These ratings can be used for the developmental plans of the employee.
1 - Rare
improve performance. Examples may include doing something better, faster, at alower cost, more
efficiently; or improving quality, costumer satisfaction, morale, without setting any specific goal.
eamwork
Willingly does his/her share of responsibilty.
Promotes collaboration and removes barriers to teamwork and goal accomplishment across the
organization
5
4
Works constructively and collaboratively with others and across organizations to accomplish
organizational goals and objectives.
4.2
ervice Orientation
Can explain and articulate organizational directions, issues and problems.
Takes personal responsibilty for dealing with and/or correcting costumer service issues and
concerns
Initiates activities that promotes advocacy for men and women empowerment.
Participates in updating of office vision, mission, mandates & strategies based on DepEd
strategies and directions.
Develops and adopts service improvement programs through simplified procedures that will
further enhance service delivery.
4.2
nnovation
Examines the root cause of problems and suggests effective solutions. Fosters new ideas,
processes, and suggests bettter ways to do things (cost and/or operational efficiency).
Demonstrates an ability to think "beyond the box". Continuously focuses on improving personal
productivity to create higher value and results.
3
5
3.6
Promotes a creative climate and inspires co-workers to develop original ideas or solutions.
3
Translates creative thinking into tangible changes and solutions that improve the work unit and
organization.
Uses ingenious methods to accomplish responsibilties. Demonstrates resourcefulness and the
ability to succeed with minimal resources.
monstrates;
3
4
1 - Rarely demonstrates
Identifies different computer parts, turns the computer on/off, and work on a given task with
acceptable speed and accuracy and connects computer peripherals ( e.g., printers, modems,
multi-media projectors, etc.)
4.09
CORE SKILLS
OVERALL RATING
monstrates;
4.09
1 - Rarely demonstrates
Employee-Superior Agreement
The signatures below confirm that the employee and his/her superior have agreed to the contents of the performance as captured in this form.
CHOKEY SORIANO
Name of Employee:
Name of Superior:
Signature:
Signature:
Date:
Date:
Development Needs
(Recommended
Developmental Intervention)
* Needs to write full descriptions on the Procedure part of the lesson * Enough time and lesser extra-classroom works to have more
focus on teaching and classroom management
plans
Action Plan
CHOKEY SORIANO
Ratee
HELEN P. MABINI
Rater
SCUSSION
Rating
0.80
HELEN P. MABINI
S
Timeline
Resources Needed
* Stakeholders
* Donations
* Sponsors
* Interviews
* Internet
* Resource Persons
HELEN P. MABINI
Rater