• Know what a conference committee does – constant knowledge of updates
• Expert on domestic politics • Effective politics debates o Timely, coherent mechanism o Applies to virtually every case o NB to CPs o Large magnitude – myriad of impacts o Showcase your knowledge of politics o Be informed, be an expert, be a junkie = win • Politics research o Politico, Mike Allen Playbook – 7AM ET everyday (rundown of everything politics) o Ezra Klein Wonkbook – more policy focused politics journal o Nate Silver – 538.com Former debater – statistical analysis of politics o Politicalwire.com o The fix – non-partisan/generic o Partisan blogs Moveon.org o Realclearpolitics.com Good links o Twitter A more efficient google reader o Google news, Lexis, Twitter o Larry Sabato – Crystal Ball o Charlie Cook o CQ politics o Rothenberg • DA o Top of agenda – more truth value to priority (unq.) currently financial reform o economy impacts, etc. o impact flexibility magnitude, timeframe, probability make the DA your “aff” on the neg o Structuring Read best cards in 1NC – cx and block ext. Make links as specific as possible Decide how many impacts you want to read DA turns case arguments – 1NC • Debating the Impact(s) o Always do impact comparison – turns every adv. (try to have cards) o Debating impact – turns on pltx o 1NC impact – only read impacts you can defend against impact turns o Attack the impacts – fringe v. mainstream o Always emphasize the 1NC impacts o Read new impacts in 2NC – don’t be afraid of impact turns X impact solves turn • Econ reform = terrorism, 2NC reads heg adv. Which solves terrorism o Compare Don’t just read more cards – make meaningful comparisons • Debating uniqueness o Vital part of politics o Read ev, make meaningful comparisons Insert knowledge o Date sometimes relevant, other times not • only if some epic change occurs in the timeframe • make a point to say what their cards don’t account for because of unq. recent ev does not necessarily mean it’s better descriptive v. predictive evidence • predictive ev better than a snapshot – assumes final result o snapshot influences predictive results • if neg reads unq. cards not related to i/l – in 2AR advance unq. overwhelms the link o Evidence distinction Qualifications – FOXNews v. Washington Post • Partisan blogs, journals, etc – look at motivations • Look for solid, non-partisan, predictive evidence • Sift through the junk to get to the quality ev • Specific ev like vote counts – hard/solid number/chances o Objective unq. Arg – emphasize • Take at least a little time to highlight how inadequate their ev is • Lobbies paid to support things – not good ev • Issue-specific unq. o/w (what issues tradeoff) • Strength of your link – read another link in 2NC • Link unq. –ie withdraw now o Deny o Magnitude of the link arg o Issue-spec unq. o/w o Debating the link Winners win Plan popular Turn- bipartisanship • AT turn: n/u bipart high, turn - plan not bipartisan, bipart not key, turn – gop moderates support bill, turn – moderates hate plan, not key to vote, won’t switch, your link acess theirs – PC key to snowe/Collins • Magnitude of link • Ev comparison • Read new links o Midterms DA Senate • 57 to 41 D - R House • 235 to 178 D - R cotell args – obama will mirror pattern of other candidates • senate and house spots research history of handicappers define what matters AT: TURN – GOP MODERATES 1. N/U – snowe/Collins