Test report
No. 161 22335/1.2.0 e
Date of report
Customer
Order
Specimen
Contents
Ulster Prot Dipl Ing dose Sch
‘Teodor Git Si, P5
tones Resenhe
Fenster
Tiren @
Fassaden
Werkstoffe
Zubehor
ROSENHEIM
15 december 1999
SCHUCO International KG
Karolinenstrae 1-15
D-33609 Bielefeld
Determination of the airborne sound insulation of a facade _
element with fixed glazing according to the German standard
DIN 52210 and DIN EN ISO 717-1
(Aptitude testing I for DIN 4109)
Facade element with fixed glazing
of the product designation FW 60™
1. Definition of task
2 Test specimen
3 Test procedure
4 Test results
5 Information for use of Lf.t. test reports —
Measurement sheet (1 page)
‘Annex (1 page)
‘Telefon (0 80 31) 261-0, ‘Sparkasse Rosenteim: ee
Teletar (08031) 261.200 fo 38 2 (82 111 50000)
‘mall Ino@itrocarnom do Pocscheckamt Munch:
Iitpaltwreaitosento se Kio, 2849 26-80" (BLZ 700100 60) DaP-F00808-0+97.00,Page 20f4 °
Test report 161 22335/1.2.0e of 15 december 1999
Company _ SCHUCO International KG, D-33609 Bielefeld
ROSENHEIM
1 Definition of task
The if. Rosenheim was charged by SCHUCO International KG, D-33609 Bielefeld, to
determine the airborne sound insulation according to DIN 52210 and DIN EN ISO 717-1 of
a facade element with fixed glazing of the product designation .FW 60™.
This test serves for the evidence of aptitude for the requirements stated in DIN 4109
(aptitude test 1)
2 Test specimen
Specimen Facade element
System name Fweo"
Frame material Aluminium profile with thermal break, untreated surface
Frame
Exterior dimensions 1230 mm x 1480 mm
Mullion cross-section 150,5mm x= 60mm
Transom cross-section 126,5mm x 60mm
Glazing Insulating glass unit
Designation / Type Phonstop 36/42
Visible pane dimensions 1110 mm x 1360 mm
Pane construction 42/20/4 (mm) Total thickness: 36 mm
Filling in pane space 47% Asgon, 12% SF, (according to if.t. analysis)
Glass sealing exterior and interior with sealing profiles
Vapour pressure balance __ by profiles in mullions
The facade element with fixed glazing can be seen in cross-section in the measurement
sheet and in the annex,
‘Specimen collection Production of the specimens by the customer regarding the
necessary dimensions.
Delivery of specimen 29 november 1999
Date of test 30 november 1999
3. Test procedure
The test specimen was mounted into the test opening of the partition wall of the window test
rig P-F according to DIN 52210-02:1984 using a mounting frame which was weighted with
lead. It was butt jointed as prescribed for installation type 2, it was wedged and secured and
was opened and closed several times. The connecting joints were completely stuffed with
plastic foam and sealed on both sides with plastic sealant of type Perennator 2001 S grey.Page 30f4 ®
Test report 161 22336/1.3.0e of 15 december 1999
Company _ SCHUCO International KG, D-33609 Bielefeld
ROSENHEIM
For measuring the airborne sound insulation a test noise was generated using a
dodecahedron loudspeaker in the source room. With a two-channel measurement system
for building acoustics the sound level difference between the sound level L, in the source
room and the sound level L, in the receiving room was measured at least at two positions of
the loudspeakers according to DIN 52210-1:1984-08. The microphones automatically
moved through the room on a circular path.
Two measurements of the reverberation were carried out in the receiving room using two
positions of loudspeaker and microphone each. The reverberation times T were achieved
by taking the arithmetic average. The equivalent area of absorption A is calculated using the
volume V of the receiving room as follows:
A=0,63 x m
From the measurement values and the test area S of the test specimen the sound reduction
index R is calculated following the function:
s
R=L,-L,+10-lg> dB
2 las
The measurement was carried out using the following equipment:
Apparatus Type Producer
Integrating measurement device Type Nortronic 840 —_Norsonic-Tippkemper
Microphone-preamplifier Type 1201 Norsonic-Tippkemper
Microphone Type 1220 Norsonic-Tippkemper
Pistonphone Type 4220 Briel & Kjeer
Loudspeaker dodecahedron Type 228,96 Ohm —_Norsonic-Tippkemper
Amplifier Type 235,100 W _Norsonic-Tippkemper
Rotating microphone Type 231-N-360 _Norsonic-Tippkemper
In three year intervals the i.f.1. attends to comparing measurements at the Physikalisch-
Technische Bundesanstalt (Federal institution for physical-technical affairs) at Braun-
schweig. The sound level meter of the acoustic measurement system is regularly calibrated
at the Eichamt (Office of weights and measures) at Dortmund. The complete measuring
arrangement is calibrated at the beginning of a sound level measurement.
The if. Rosenheim is included as no. “BAY 18" into the “list of bodies for testing,
surveillance and certification according to the land’s building directive” issued by the DIBt.
4 Test results
4.1. Tested and calculated values
The values of the measured airborne sound reduction index of the tested facade element
with fixed glazing are drawn-up in the diagram of the annexed data sheet as a function of
the frequency and are given in the following table:
xmaurirrsRovexTevonzzies@23361306 dorPage ofa e
Test report 161 22335/1.20e of 15 december 1999
Company _ SCHUCO Intemational KG, D-33609 Bielefeld
OO ROSENHEIM
finkz | 50 63 80 | 100 125 160 | 200 250 315 | 400 500 _630
RindB | 37,1 31,8 326| 27,1 293 22,4 | 256 297 345] 379 41,2 41,2
finHz | 800 1000 1250 | 1600 2000 2500 | 3150 4000 _5000
RindB | 401 409 419/458 481 480| 456 47.3 506
From that the weighted sound reduction index Ry according to DIN EN ISO 717-1: 1997-01
can be calculated for the frequency range from 100 Hz to 3150 and the spectrum adaption
terms C and Cy:
Ry (CiC,) = 44 (-2;-6) dB
According to DIN EN ISO 717-1:1997-01 further spectrum adaptation terms result from that
Ceosiso -2 dB Creo.s000. -1 dB Ceosooo = -1 dB
6 0B Cysoos00 = -6 dB Crsosoo = -6 dB
Cy soaso
For the evidence of aptitude according to DIN 4109 is valid:
Tested value Rw,
41dB and _— calculated value Ry, =39dB
The characteristic values Ry» and Ry» as well as the required margin between laboratory
measurements and in-situ measurements (2 dB) correspond to DIN 4109 : 1989-11.
42 Vali
ity of test results
The values given in this test report are only valid for the specimen described in item 2.
General conclusions for the construction and other functional details may not be drawn from
this test report.
5 Information for use of i.f.t. test reports
Regulations for the use of test reports are given in the enclosed information sheet
Conditions and information for use of if. test reports for publication and commercial
purposes"
i.f.t, Rosgfieim
15 dece¢nbgr 1999
(9.
Dept. Sound insulation
Dr. Rolf SchumacherSound insulation index acc. to DIN 52210 - 3
Customer: SCHUCO International KG, D-33609 Bielefeld
Aptitude testing I
for DIN 4109
Test ace. to DIN §2210-03-E1-L-P.F-2
Date of test 30 november 1999
Areaoftest —1,25mx 1,50 m= 1,88 m2
Laboratory _Tworleaf conerete wall,
partion wall DIN §2210-2: 1984
Testnoise Pink noise
Volumes of Vs = 109,93
testrooms — Ve= 101,33
Max possible Rwmax = 62.48
sound reduction (related to test area)
Mounting Window builtin butt jointed to test-
conditions opening and secured with wedges,
Connecting joints completely stuffed
with plastic foam and sealed with
plastic seatants on both sides.
Rua = Rye — 2 dB
Weighted sound reduction indices Ry,
Tested value Rup
1 dB
(according to if.t. analysis)
gram Rif)
Calculated value Rye = 3948
Specimen Facade element with fixed glazing
Frame material Aluminium profile for facades
Window system FW 60"
Dimensions 1230 mm x 1480 mm
Glazing Insulating glass unit
Phonstop 36/42
Pane construction 12/20/4 (mm)
Filling in space 47% Argon, 12% SF
curve of reference
—— measurement curve
60
50
ing sound index R in 4B
40
30
20
10
125250
500
1000 2000
Frequency f in Hz
Test report No.: 161 22335/1.2.0 6
i.f.t, Rosenheim, 15 december 1999
fad of testing Wha
Dr. Rolf Schumacher
ROSENHEIM,‘Annex Page 1 of 1 @
Test report 161 22335/1.2.0e of 16 december 1999
Company _ SCHUCO international KG, D-33609 Bielefeld
ROSENHEIM
Soe}
Note
‘This annex was composed using documents of the customer.
There was no complete examination for technical conectness.
usaurnnrsenovexrenstcznszzsastae doc