Professional Documents
Culture Documents
www.elsevier.com/locate/compstruct
a,b,*
, Hong Yu Sheng
a
School of Civil Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
Institute of Civil Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, PR China
Abstract
The interlaminar stresses and displacements near the free-edges and ply cracks are investigated by using the state space equation
method for general cross-ply laminates subjected to extension and/or thermal loading. By this approach, a laminated plate may
be composed of an arbitrary number of orthotropic layers, each of which may have dierent material properties and thickness.
The method takes into account all independent material constants and guarantees continuous elds of all interlaminar stresses
across interfaces between material layers. Numerical solutions are compared with results obtained from other methods. It is found
that the theory provides a satisfactory approximation to the stress singularity occurring in the vicinity of the free-edges and ply
cracks.
2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Free-edge; Ply cracking; Laminate; State space; Interlaminar stress; Thermal loading
1. Introduction
It is a well-established fact that free-edge and internal
delaminations as well as transverse ply cracking in laminated composites are the most commonly observed
types of damage and that delaminations typically initiate from transverse matrix cracks [1]. This damage results from the interlaminar stresses at free-edge and
ply cracking due to the mismatch of material properties
between plies. Thus in these regions near free-edge and
ply cracking, it has been recognized that the stress state
is three-dimensional in nature and not predictable accurately by the classical lamination theory (CLT) [2,3]. In
the last few decades, numerous investigators have used a
variety of methods to attempt to calculate the interlaminar stresses in the vicinity of free-edge and ply cracks.
These include analytical, numerical, and semi-analytical
*
0263-8223/$ - see front matter 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.04.021
on equilibrated stress representations and used the principle of minimum complimentary energy to investigate
the interlaminar stresses near straight free-edges of
beam-type laminated composite structures under outof-plane shear/bending. Using the extended Kantorovich method by Kerr [25] and the complementary minimum energy principle to predict the stress functions, the
interlaminar stresses at the free-edges in composite laminates were estimated by Cho and Yoon [26]. Using the
full layerwise theory [27], Tahani and Nosier [2830]
investigated the interlaminar stresses near the free-edges
of general cross-ply composite laminates under uniform
axial extension, thermal loading, and bi-directional
bending. On the basis of the theory of three-dimensional
elasticity, Ye and Sheng [31] extended the state space
method, which has been successfully used in analyses
of laminates subjected to various load and boundary
conditions [3235], to solve free-edge stresses in crossply laminated cylinders subjected to axisymmetrically
distributed transverse loads.
Finite dierence methods and nite element analysis
are very popular numerical techniques. In 1970 Pipes
and Pagano [36] developed the rst complete 3D analysis of interlaminar stresses by applying nite dierence
techniques to the governing elasticity equation. Later
Salamon [37], Altus et al. [38] and Bhaskar et al. [39]
also employed this method to solve free-edge problems.
The nite dierence method was followed quickly by nite element solutions, utilized by Rybicki [40], Isakson
and Levy [41], Herakovich et al. [42], Wang and Crossman [43], Kim and Hong [44], Icardi and Bertetto [45],
Lessard et al. [46], Yi and Hilton [47], Gaudenzi et al.
[48], and Lindemann and Becker [49].
Although nite element method is probably one of
the most universal methods that can be applied to problems involving any cross section and lamination prole,
it is sometimes quite computational expensive and even
unreliable for free-edge analysis of multi-layered laminates [31]. Consequently, some semi-analytical approaches were proposed combining the traditional
nite element method with a certain analytical technique. Dong and Goetshel [50] used a semi-analytical
model, combining the nite element interpolations over
the thickness with exponential decay into the plates
interior, to investigate the behaviour of a laminate plate
composed of an arbitrary number of bonded, elastic,
anisotropic layers. A state space nite element method
that combines the traditional nite element approximation and the recursive formulation of state space equation [31,51] is proposed to solve the stress singularities
in the vicinity of free-edges or localized traction free surfaces by Ye et al. [52].
Relatively less attention has been addressed to the
analysis of interlaminar stresses in unsymmetric laminates. For most designs of composite laminates,
symmetric layup about the middle-plane are often
315
yy
L
h
z,w
y,v
x,u
yy
Fig. 1. Nomenclature of a single-layered plate.
316
ay
az
0 T ;
0;
5
>
ox
oy
oz
>
>
>
>
>
>
> orxz oryz orzz 0.
:
ox
oy
oz
ov
eyy oy
;
ezz ow
;
oz
ov
ov
; exz ou
ow
; exy ou
ox
.
eyz ow
oy
oz
oz
ox
oy
ov
e0 constant;
oy
exy
ou ov
0.
oy ox
eyz
ow ov
0;
oy oz
7
C 1 C 13 =C 33 ;
C 2 C 11 C 213 =C 33 ;
C 3 C 12 C 13 C 23 =C 33 ;
C 4 C 22 C 223 =C 33 ;
C 7 1=C 33 ;
C 5 C 23 =C 33 ;
C 8 1=C 55 .
8
From the third equation of Eqs. (4) and (6), the following relation is obtained:
ow
C 1 au C 7 rzz C 5 e0 C 1 ax C 5 ay az DT .
oz
9
Substituting Eq. (9) into the rst equation of Eq. (4)
yields:
rxx C 2 au C 1 rzz C 3 eo C 2 ax C 3 ay DT .
10
8
>
>
>
<
>
>
>
:
0
C 5 e0 C 1 ax C 5 ay az DT
0
0
9
>
>
>
=
>
>
>
;
11
where
ux; z and U(0)(z) are two unknown displacement
functions that can be determined by imposing traction
free conditions along free-edges and this will be discussed in the next section.
Introducing Eq. (12) into (11) yields
o
fFg GfFg fBg;
oz
13a
h
0
2
fBm zg mp
1 cos mp dU dz z
dU 0 z
2x
1
;C 5 e0 C 1 ax C 5 ay az DT
fBg
dz
L
T
2C 1 0
U z;0;0 ;
13b
L
T
13c
u w rxz rzz
fFg
and [G] is the 4 4 matrix shown in Eq. (11). For the
displacements and stresses in {F}, the following Fourier
series expansions are assumed:
9
8 9
8
u >
U m z sinnx >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
= X
=
< w >
< W m z cosnx >
1 >
;
14
>
> X m z sinnx >
rxz >
>
>
>
m0 >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
;
;
: >
:
rzz
Z m z cosnx
where n = mp/L, L is the length of the plate in the x
direction. In the case of a uniformly distributed extension and thermal loading, the axial displacement u is
zero at x = L/2. Hence, the integer m in Eq. (14) takes
only even numbers, i.e. m = 0, 2, 4, . . .
Substituting Eq. (14) into Eq. (13a) and expanding
also the x coordinate in vector {B} into a Fourier series,
as follows:
1
2L X
cos mp
mpx
x
sin
15
p m0 m
L
one has the following non-homogenous state space
equation for an arbitrary value of m
d
fFm zg GfFm zg fBm zg;
dz
W m z
C8
0
0
X m z Z m z
3
iT
;
16e
z 2 0; h.
17
In particular, at z = h,
fFm hg Dm hfFm 0g fHm hg;
18
where [Dm(h)] is called transfer matrix that can be calculated either analytically or numerically. The calculation
of the two constant matrices, [Dm(h)] and {Hm(h)}, in
Eq. (18) can be found from [35].
2.2. A cross-ply laminated composite plate
2.2.1. Description of the problem
Consider a simple composite plate of thickness h,
width L, innite length and number of plies n (Fig. 2).
Again the plate is subjected to a uniaxial tension by
application of a constant longitudinal strain, eyy, and a
uniform temperature variation, DT. The composite plate
is made up of 0 and 90 plies that are assumed to be
orthotropic and linearly elastic.
2.2.2. Formulation
For a thick homogeneous or laminated plate, we may
imagine that it is composed of N ctitious sub-layers,
each of which may have dierent thickness. However,
it is assumed that the thickness of all the ctitious sublayers approach zero uniformly as N approaches innity. Assuming, in addition, that dierent sub-layers
Interface
Free edge
16a
yy
L
7
C7 7
7
7;
C 1 n 7
5
16b
Free edge
Fiber
Orientation
0 or 90
z,w
16c
x,u
y,v
zz
yy
0
0 n
0
fB0 zg 0; C 5 e0 C 1 ax C 5 ay az DT :
2C 1 0
U z; 0; 0
L
m 2; 4; . . ..
where
m z
fFm zg U
2
0
n
6
6 C1n 0
6
G 6
6 C 2 n2 0
4
Dm zfFm 0g fHm zg
where
317
xz
yz
yy
xx
xy
T
;
16d
318
19
After repeating the above process for all individual sublayers and with appropriate continuity requirements imposed at all the real and ctitious interfaces, a solution
for the entire laminate can be formulated. Also, the solution can be found to the required accuracy by increasing
the total number of the thin layers, subjected to satisfy
boundary conditions.
In order to nd the solution of the problem, we must
solve rst the unknown displacement function, U(0)(z),
appearing in Eq. (16). If the ctitious sub-layers of the
laminate are all suciently thin, it is reasonable to assume that the displacement U(0)(z) within the thin layer
is linearly distributed in the z direction, i.e.
0
U j z U
j 1
z
z
U
j
hj
hj
z 2 0; hj ;
j 1; 2; . . . ; N ;
20
0
where U
j and U j are the values of U j z at the upper
and bottom surfaces of the jth thin layer. Inserting Eq.
(20) into Eqs. (16d) and (16e), vector {Bm(z)}j in Eq.
(19) can be expressed as
fB0 zgj 0; C 5 e0 C 1 ax C 5 ay az DT
2C 1
L
T
z
z
U
;
0;
0
1
U
; z 2 0; hj ;
j
j
hj
hj
21
fBm zgj
4 U j U j
mp
hj
0 0 0
iT
; m 2; 4; .. ..
22
Fm hj
j
Dm hj j fFm 0gj Hm hj j .
where
m
D
!
1
Y
Dm hj j ;
jN
m
H
2
Y
!
Dm j fHm g1
jN
23
25b
3
Y
!
Dm j
jN
fH m g2 fH m gN .
25c
{Fm(hN)}N and {Fm(0)}1 are, respectively, the state vectors at the upper and bottom surfaces of the laminated
plate. Upon using the traction free conditions at the
upper and bottom surfaces, the following stress conditions are obtained:
X m hN ; Z m hN TN 0; 0T ; X m 0; Z m 0T1 0; 0T :
26
Substituting Eq. (26) into Eq. (25) yields the following linear algebra equation system:
m
32
U
D31 D
H m3
;
27
41 D
42
m4
D
H
Wm 1
m and
mi are the relevant elements in D
ij and H
where D
fHm g, respectively. Eq. (27) is a set of linear algebra
equations in terms of the two displacement components,
m and Wm, at the upper surface. The free terms of Eq.
U
m3 and H
m4 , contain 2 N unknown constants,
(27), H
U
and
U
j
1; 2; . . . ; N , introduced in Eq. (20).
j
j
These constants are determined by introducing boundary conditions along the edges of the laminate. In particular, Eq. (27) is satised automatically when m = 0.
and then using Eqs. (23) and (24) recursively, a relationship between the state vectors on the upper and bottom
surfaces of the plate is established as follows:
m fFm 0g H
m ;
25a
fFm hN gN D
1
N
28
2U 0
.
L
29
0
2C 2 0
U z .
C 3 e0 C 2 ax C 3 ay DT j
L
j
90
rxx C 2 a
u C 1 rzz C 3 e0 C 2 ax C 3 ay DT C 2
319
0
L
Crack
30
2C 2 0
U z 0.
L
j
Crack
surface
u0
u0
L
31
x
u0
u0
Due to symmetry, we only need to impose the condition at x = 0. Thus, from Eq. (30), we obtain the following condition:
X
m z C 1 Z m z C 3 e0 C 2 ax C 3 ay DT
C 2 nU
j
j
32
Fig. 4 shows the cross section of a representative element taken from Fig. 3. In order to use the recursive formulations the representative element is further divided
into N ctitious sub-layers. Again, each sub-layer may
have dierent thickness and dierent sub-layers may
be composed of dierent orthotropic materials. In Fig.
4 a global rectangular Cartesian coordinate system x
yz is chosen for the element.
For cracked layers at x = 0, L the crack surfaces in
the crack plane are traction free, i.e.
rxz rxy rxx 0.
33
ov
e0 0.
oy
34
2C 2 0
U z
a
0.
35
Due to the laminate is subjected to a uniform extension and thermal loading, for uncracked layers at x = 0,
L the longitude displacement of an arbitrary jth layer in
x direction remains constant, that is
uj u 0 .
36
320
37
4. Numerical examples and discussion
C 11 C 33 15300 N=mm2 ;
C 44 C 55 5900 N=mm2 ;
C 12 C 23 3900 N=mm2 ;
0.5
2500
zz / 0
1.5
2000
-400
n = 24
n = 32
-800
xz / 0
C 13 3300 N=mm2 .
39
x/h
C 22 140000 N=mm2 ;
( N / mm 2 )
n = 24
1500
n = 32
1000
n = 40
500
x/h
n = 40
0
( N / mm 2)
0.5
1.5
-500
-1200
x/h
2500
0
0
0.5
-200
2000
-400
m = 400
m = 600
-1400
m = 200
m = 400
m = 200
-800
-1200
( N / mm )
1500
-600
-1000
zz / 0
1.5
m = 600
1000
500
x/h
xz / 0
0
2
( N / mm )
0.5
-500
1.5
x/h
0
200
0.5
600
800
present
1000
Ye et al.
1400
1000
2000
3000
0.25
0.5
0.75
z/h
1
1000
zz / 0 ( N / mm 2 )
0.25
0.5
0.75
z/h
1
2500
zz / 0
1.5
( N / mm )
1500
present
1000
Ye et al.
Wang et al.
500
x/h
xz / 0
Wang et al.
0
0
( N / mm )
4000
zz / 0 (N / mm2 )
2000
400
1200
1000
0
321
0.5
1.5
500
Fig. 7. Distribution of interlaminar stresses at the 0/90 interface in [0/90]s laminate under uniform axial strain.
322
ET 14.48 GPa
mTT 0.21
1
z/h
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
zz T
0.2
0.1
aL 0.36 106 = C
( C N / mm2 )
0
-0.5
aT 28.8 106 = C.
40
The geometry of the laminate is assumed to have the
width L, and thickness h, with L = 4h. Also each of the
material layers is of equal thickness h/4 and idealized as
a homogeneous orthotropic material.
The variations of interlaminar stresses rxz and rzz at
the 90/0 interface of [90/0]s laminates are displayed
in Fig. 10. Except for the region very close to the freeedge, the present results of rxz agree well with those of
Tahani and Nosier [29]. It is to be noted that although
Tahani and Nosiers results may be improved by
increasing the number of sub-layers in each lamina,
the numerical value of rxz cannot satisfy the traction
free conditions along x = 0. The variation of interlaminar normal stress rzz through the thickness of 903 =0
laminate is shown in Fig. 11. It can be seen that the steep
gradients occur near the 90/0 interface and the value of
transverse normal stress rzz diminishes to zero at both
top and bottom surfaces of the laminate.
-0.4
-0.3
-0.2
-0.1
0.1
0.2
0.3
extension and thermal loading. A two-dimensional analytical mode has been established by McCartney and
Pierse [55] to calculate stress transfer in such a cracked
laminate. As a part of validation of the present method,
the interfacial shear and normal stresses at the interface
between 0 ply and 90 ply of a four ply ([0/90]s)
graphite/epoxy laminate are calculated and compared
with the results obtained using McCartney and Pierses
[55] solution. The laminate is subjected to a uniaxial
average stress of r = 0.2 GPa, and a uniform thermal
load of DT = 120. The material properties used in
the calculations for the graphite/epoxy laminates [56]
are as follows
EL 144.78 GPa
mLT 0.31
ET 9.58 GPa
mTT 0.55
aL 0.72 106 = C
aT 27 106 = C.
41
0
-0.02
0.1
0
0.5
x/h
xz T
1.5
0.08
( C. N / mm2 )
-0.04
0.06
present
-0.06
0.04
-0.08
-0.1
-0.12
present
-0.14
Tahani and Nosier
-0.16
xz T
-0.18
( C. N / mm2 )
-0.2
0.02
0
-0.02
-0.04
x/h
-0.06
0
0.5
1.5
Fig. 10. Distribution of interlaminar stresses at the 90/0 interface in a [90/0]s laminate due to a temperature change.
0.14
0
0.5
x/h
zz (GPa)
1.5
-0.01
323
0.12
0.1
present
-0.02
0.08
-0.03
0.06
present
0.04
-0.04
x/h
-0.05
0
xz (GPa)
-0.06
-0.02
0.5
1.5
Fig. 12. Distribution of interlaminar stresses at the 0/90 interface in [0/90]s laminate with ply cracking under uniform axial strain and thermal
loading.
2.5
u(10-3mm)
Present
McCartney
and Pierse
1.5
1
6. Concluding remarks
0.5
0
z/h
-0.5
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
xx (GPa)
0.7
Present
McCartney
and Pierse
0.5
0.3
0.1
z/h
-0.1
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
tal displacement u and axial stress rxx through the thickness at x = 0 in the x direction of the representative element, respectively. Due to symmetry, only the
distribution across top half of the element is plotted.
In Fig. 13 the horizontal displacement from the present
solution remains constant along the uncracked surface
(0 6 z/h 6 0.25), while the result obtained by McCartney and Pierse [55] varies slightly near the crack tip
324
model is valid for general unsymmetrical cross-ply laminates subjected to both mechanical loading and thermal
loading.
Acknowledgements
Financial support of this work from the ORS Awards
and the University of Leeds is gratefully acknowledged.
References
[1] Schoeppner GA, Pagano NJ. Stress elds and energy release rates
in cross-ply laminates. Int J Solids Struct 1998;35(11):102555.
[2] Dong SB, Pister KS, Taylor RL. On the theory of laminated
anisotropic shells and plates. J Aeronaut Sci 1962;29(8):96975.
[3] Reissner E, Stavsky Y. Bending and stretching of certain types of
heterogeneous allotropic elastic plates. ASME J Appl Mech
1961;28:4028.
[4] Herakovich CT. Free-edge eects in laminated composites. In:
Herakovich CT, Tarnopolskii YM, editors. Handbook of composites, structure and design, vol. 2. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1989.
[5] Pagano NJ, Schoeppner GA. Delamination of polymer matrix
composites: problems and assessment. In: Talreja RE, Manson J,
editors. Comprehensive composite materials, chapter 2.13.
[6] Kant T, Swaminathan K. Estimation of transverse interlaminar
stresses in laminated compositesa selective review and survey of
current developments. Compos Struct 2000;49:6575.
[7] Puppo AH, Evensen HA. Interlaminar shear in laminated
composite under generalized plane stress. J Compos Mater
1970;4:20420.
[8] Pagano NJ. On the calculation of interlaminar normal stress in
composite laminate. J Compos Mater 1974;8:6581.
[9] Hsu PW, Herakovich CT. Edge eects in angle-ply composite
laminates. J Compos Mater 1977;11:4228.
[10] Tang S. A boundary layer theory-Part 1: Laminated composites in
plane stress. J Compos Mater 1975;9:3341.
[11] Davet JL, Destuynder Ph. Free-edge stress concentration in
composite laminates: A boundary layer approach. Comput Meth
Appl Mech Eng 1986;59(2):12940.
[12] Ko C-C, Lin C-C. Method for calculating interlaminar stresses in
symmetric laminates containing a circular hole. AIAA J
1992;30(1):197204.
[13] Pipes RB, Pagano NJ. Interlaminar stresses in composite laminatesan approximate elastic solution. ASME J Appl Mech
1974;41:66872.
[14] Pagano NJ. Stress elds in composite laminates. Int J Solids
Struct 1978;14(4):385400.
[15] Lekhnitskii SG. Theory of elasticity of an anisotropic elastic
body. San Francisco: Holden Day; 1963.
[16] Wang SS, Choi I. Boundary-layer eects in composite laminates:
Part 1-Free-edge stress singularities. ASME J Appl Mech
1982;49:5418.
[17] Wang SS, Choi I. Boundary-layer eects in composite laminates:
Part 2-Free edge stress solutions and basic characteristics. ASME
J Appl Mech 1982;49:54960.
[18] Wang SS, Choi I. The interface crack between dissimilar anisotropic materials. ASME J Appl Mech 1983;50:16978.
[19] Wang SS, Choi I. The interface crack behaviour in dissimilar
anisotropic composite under mixed mode loading. ASME J Appl
Mech 1983;50:17983.
[20] Kassapoglou C, Lagace PA. An ecient method for the calculation of interlaminar stresses in composite materials. ASME J
Appl Mech 1986;53:74450.
325
[51] Fan JR, Ye JQ. An exact solution for the statics and dynamics of
laminated thick plates with orthotropic layers. Int J Solids Struct
1990;26(5/6):65562.
[52] Ye JQ, Sheng HY, Qin QH. A state space nite element for
laminated composites with free edges and subjected to transverse
and in-plane loads. Comput Struct 2004;82:113141.
[53] Herakovich CT. Mechanics of brous composites. New
York: Wiley; 1998.
[54] Wang YM, Tarn JQ, Hsu CK. State space approach for stress
decay in laminates. Int J Solids Struct 2000;37:353553.
[55] McCartney LN, Pierse C. Stress transfer mechanics for multiple
ply laminates for axial loading and bending. In: Proc. of the 11th
Int. Conf. on Composite Materials, Gold Cost, Australia, July
1418, 1997. p. 66271.
[56] Groves SE, Harris CE, Highsmith AL, Allen DH, Norvell RG.
An experimental and analytical treatment of matrix cracking in
cross-ply laminates. Exp Mech 1987;27:739.