Professional Documents
Culture Documents
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Available online 12 June 2012
Keywords:
Photovoltaic
MPPT
PWM
Direct Torque Control
a b s t r a c t
We aim to nd a better control and optimization among the different functions of a solar pumping system. The photovoltaic panel can provide a maximum power only for dened output voltage and current.
In addition, the operation to get the maximum power depends on the terminals of load, mostly a nonlinear load like induction motor. In this work, we propose an intelligent control method for the maximum
power point tracking of a photovoltaic system under variable temperature and irradiance conditions. The
system was tested without maximum power point tracking, with the use of Scalar-Based control motor,
but we cannot maintain the speed optimal. Next, we developed several methods for the control. Finally,
we have chosen the Direct Torque Control.
2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
A photovoltaic (PV) panel is one of the cleanest and environment-friendly non-conventional energy sources. A PV panel directly converts solar energy into electrical energy. The electrical
energy produced by the PV panel can be extracted over time and
used in the form of electric power. This electric power can be used
to drive electric devices. Typically the power is extracted by using
DC/DC up/down converter circuits and/or DC/AC inverter circuit
[13]. Solar cell consists of a pn junction fabricated in a thin wafer
or layer of semiconductor. The output currentvoltage (IV) characteristic of a solar cell has an exponential characteristic similar
to that of a diode witch therefore set the open circuit voltage characteristics of the cell. Thus the simplest equivalent circuit of a solar
cell is a current source in parallel with a diode, as is illustrated in
Fig. 1.
A PV panel in a uniform and constant irradiation has IV characteristics, for irradiation there is only one operating point, known
as the Maximum Power Point (MPP). For the latter, the PV panel
operates at maximum efciency and produces a maximum of
power (Pmax). When we connect a load directly to a PV panel, the
operating point is not necessarily the MPP but it will be the intersection of the IV characteristics with the load line, as it is represented in Fig. 2. Generally the operating point is not a MPP of the
PV panel. Then in the direct coupling of the loads, the PV panels
are often oversized in order to ensure sufcient power to supply
the load and this leads to a system excessively expensive. To overcome this problem, the tracking module can be used to maintain
the operation of the PV panel at Pmax, this can be done by means
Corresponding author. Tel.: +213 771789668; fax: +213 45804236.
E-mail address: chergui_cum@yahoo.fr (C. Moulay-Idriss).
0196-8904/$ - see front matter 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2011.08.026
656
Nomenclature
ICELL (A)
VCELL (V)
Ics (A)
e
Rs (X)
Rsh (X)
ISAT (A)
n
is
is
is
is
is
is
is
is
the
the
the
the
the
the
the
the
current cell
voltage cell
short circuit current of cell
electronic charge (1.6021 1019 C)
resistance in series parameter of the array
resistance in shunt parameter of the array
saturation current
ideality factor
which did not allow the PVG to start the pumping operation.
Although the drive shaft is rotated, however, the pump could not
ow the water. The electromagnetic torque is too low with transient peaks. This is due to the low speed and power absorbed by
the motor. According to the simulation results presented, we can
claim that the responses of the system are long and the operating
systems have not been met. To remedy this situation, we are called
to use a tracking device at the PVG to extract maximum of available power, and to insert a regulator to run the motor with a constant voltage/frequency ratio (r).
Rt
gMPPT R t0
0
Pm t dt
Pmax t dt
dIMPP
IOP
dV MPP
V OP
Note that the left-hand side of Eq. (2) represents the opposite of the
PV arrays instantaneous conductance, while the right-hand side
represents its incremental conductance. Thus, at the Maximum
Power Point, these two quantities must be equal in magnitude,
but opposite in sign. If the operating point is off of the MPP, a set
of inequalities can be derived from Eq. (2) that indicates whether
the operating voltage is above or below the MPP voltage. These relationships are summarized as follow in Eqs. (3)(5).
dIMPP
IOP
dPPV
IF
0
dV MPP
V OP
dV PV
657
dIMPP
IOP
dP PV
<
IF
<0
dV MPP
V OP
dV PV
dIMPP
IOP
dP PV
>
IF
>0
dV MPP
V OP
dV PV
For convenience, Eq. (3) is similar to Eq. (2). In turn, Eqs. (4) and
(5) are used to determine the direction in which a perturbation
must occur to shift the operating point toward the MPP, and the
perturbation is repeated until Eq. (3) is satised. Once the MPP is
reached, the MPPT continues to operate at this point until a change
in current is measured which will correlate to a change in irradiance on the array. The relationship between voltage and current,
for the one-exponential model, is given by the following Eq. (6):
V CELL Rs ICELL
V CELL Rs ICELL
1
ICELL ISC ISAT exp
nV T
Rsh
For an optimal operating point, the PV array works at its maximum power and thus the derived power at this point is null. From
Eq. (6), it follows that the derivative of current can be expressed by
Eq. (7). During the accurate tracking cycle, the PVG terminal voltage is adjusted by comparing the values of the incremental conductance and instantaneous one [47].
!1
1 !
dICELL
qISAT
V CELL Rs ICELL
1
RS
exp
nV T
Rsh
dV
Nc aKT
658
(c) Electromagnetic and Resistant Torques (d) Power consumed by the Motor (KVA)
Fig. 5. Operation with INC-MPPT (test from 500 W/m2 to 800 W/m2).
one point, the pump will not be able to convey the water although
the PVG works with Pmax. The MPPT has been able to operate the
PVG at its Pmax, but despite that the pump could not supply the
water when the sunlight fell. We can overcome this situation by
introduce a new laws control of induction motor. Also the electro-
659
magnetic torque is very volatile, its caused by switching of inverter and the control law that imposes the switching time. To reduce
these, we use other technical of inverter control as calculated PWM
[3,811]. The results of this approach are illustrated by Fig. 6ad.
660
661
Fig. 11. Simulation results of the PV pumping system with the DTC control.
a vector PWM) and a reduction of stator ux ripples. The simulation result of the PV pumping system with the DTC control is illustrated in Fig. 11ac and e.
With the use of the DTC control, the problems of hardiness and
the requirement to use the MPPT are truly overcome and
eliminated.
7. Conclusion
To improve the efciency of PV systems, under different temperature and irradiance conditions, intelligent control for the
tracking of the maximum power point and different control method for the induction motor were applied in this paper. First, the design and simulation of a based MPPT controller was proposed.
Compared to the system without MPPT or with P&O-MPPT controller, the INC-MPPT has improved the transitional state and reduced
the uctuations in the steady state. It has characterized by relatively higher efcacy of other algorithms. Second, we have used
several methods to control the induction motor either in its scalar
or vectorial based forms with different techniques of PWM. We
opted for a voltage control to optimize the ux of induction motor.
In this case, the voltage/frequency ratio will be maintained constant by the integration of regulation based on a classic correction.
It controls the voltage of the PVG to the optimal issued by the
MPPT. After integration of MPPT, it has been noticed that the
PVG operates at its Pmax the tracking acts as an adaptor of the load.
The pump could supply the water since the requested regime has
been achieved, but we cannot conrm that this speed is optimal
because the law control of induction motor was too simplistic.
Thereafter, we carried out a test of hardiness where we found that
whatever the situation, the MPPT is able to help the PVG to run at
its maximum power. And we have overcome the problems and disadvantages of the scalar-based using different technical of PWM
control and using the different techniques of the DTC.
The introductions of DTC in PV systems are very promising.
They achieved great performances, fast responses with no over-
shoot and less uctuations in the steady state, for rapid irradiance
and/or temperature variations. This means that these controllers
are able to maintain very rapidly the operating point of the PV systems at the PPM hence improving the amount of energy effectively
extracted from the PVG, i.e. increasing the efciency of the PV system. Through this presentation, this method allows reducing ripple
of the electromagnetic torque and the stator ux, it improves the
stator current signal, but its drawback is a small ripple in the ow
due to the use of a comparator with hysteresis to two levels. It is
therefore interesting to develop and optimize a new control algorithm based on the DTC.
References
[1] Parida B, Iniyan S, Goic R. A review of solar photovoltaic technologies. Renew
Sust Energy Rev 2011;15(3):162536.
[2] Photovoltaics and the clean energy race, Photovoltaic, Bull 2002; 2002(4): 8
11.
[3] Suroso, Noguchi T. A new three-level current-source PWM inverter and its
application for grid connected power conditioner. Energy Convers Manage
2010;51(7):14919.
[4] Hohm DP, Ropp ME. Comparative study of maximum power point tracking
algorithms. Prog Photovoltaic, Res Appl 2003;11(1):4762.
[5] Yu GJ, Jung YS, Choi JY, Choy I, Song JH, Kim GS. A novel two-mode MPPT
control algorithm based on comparative study of existing algorithms. Solar
Energy 2004;76(4):45563.
[6] Hua C, Lin J. A modied tracking algorithm for maximum power tracking of
solar array. Energy Convers Manage 2004;45(6):91125.
[7] Enrique JM, Duran E, Sidrach-de-Cardona M, Andujar JM. Theoretical
assessment of the maximum power point tracking efciency of photovoltaic
facilities with different converter topologies. Solar Energy 2007;81:318.
[8] Mokeddem A, Midoun A, Kadri D, Hiadsi S, Raja Iftikhar A. Performance of a
directly-coupled PV water pumping system. Energy Convers Manage
2011;52(10):308995.
[9] Ilango GS, Rajasekar N. An improved energy saving v/f control technique for
solar powered single-phase induction motor. Energy Convers Manage
2009;50(12):29138.
[10] Ustun SV, Demirtas M. Modeling and control of v/f controlled induction motor
using genetic-ANFIS algorithm. Energy Convers Manage 2009;50(3):78691.
[11] Kojabadi HM. A comparative analysis of different pulse width modulation
methods for low cost induction motor drives. Energy Convers Manage
2011;52(1):13646.
662
[12] Ray RN, Chatterjee D, Goswami SK. An application of PSO technique for
harmonic elimination in a PWM inverter. Appl Soft Comput
2009;9(4):131520.
[13] Prasad D, Panigrahi BP, SenGupta S. Digital simulation and hardware
implementation of a simple scheme for direct torque control of induction
motor. Energy Convers Manage 2008;49(4):68797.
[14] Bouaa A, Gaubert JP, Krim F. Design and implementation of predictive current
control of three phase PWM rectier using space vector modulation (SVM).
Energy Convers Manage 2010;51(12):247381.
[15] Habetler TG, Profumo F, Pastorelli M, Tolbert LM. Direct torque control of
induction machines using space vector modulation. Trans Ind Appl IEEE
1992;28(5):104552.
[16] Kennel R, El-kholy EE, Mahmoud S, El-refaei A, Elkady F. Improved direct
control for induction motor drives with rapid prototyping system. Energy
Convers Manage 2006;47(13):19992010.