Professional Documents
Culture Documents
UNIVERSITY OF GHANA
GRADUATE BUSINESS
SCHOOL
EXECUTIVE MASTERS OF
BUSINESS
ADMINISTRATION
MANAGERIAL ACCOUNTING
TERM PAPER
Table of Contents
BACKGROUND OF THE COMPANY ................................................................................... 2
ACCOUNTING POLICIES: ..................................................................................................... 2
Basis of Accounting ............................................................................................................... 2
Basis of Preparation: .............................................................................................................. 2
Basis of Depreciation: ............................................................................................................ 2
Inventories: ............................................................................................................................. 2
Receivables............................................................................................................................. 3
Stated Capital ......................................................................................................................... 3
ANALYSES OF COMPANY PERFORMANCE ..................................................................... 3
VERTICAL ANALYSIS ....................................................................................................... 3
Income Statement ............................................................................................................... 3
Balance sheet ...................................................................................................................... 5
TREND ANALYSES ............................................................................................................. 6
Income Statement ............................................................................................................... 6
Balance Sheet ..................................................................................................................... 8
RATIO ANALYSES OF COMPANY .................................................................................... 10
PROFITABILITY RATIO ................................................................................................... 11
LIQUIDITY RATIO ............................................................................................................ 11
ACTIVITY RATIO .............................................................................................................. 13
SOLVENCY RATIO ........................................................................................................... 14
INVESTMENT RATIO ....................................................................................................... 15
CONCLUSION ........................................................................................................................ 16
REFERENCE:.......................................................................................................................... 17
APPENDIX: ............................................................................................................................. 18
Page 1 of 22
25%
5%
Motor Vehicle
20%
Inventories:
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost and net realizable value and the first in first out
principle is used. Cost is made up of the purchase price plus all direct cost incurred in bringing
the item to its present location and condition.
Page 2 of 22
Receivables
Receivables are stated at their net realisable value after providing for known specific debt
considered to be doubtful.
Stated Capital
The stated capital consists of 50,000 shares of no par value issued at GH 50,000 cash. There
are no shares in treasury or unpaid on any call.
ANALYSES OF COMPANY PERFORMANCE
VERTICAL ANALYSIS
Income Statement
Table 1: Vertical Analysis on Income Statement
2013
2014
2015
100
100
100
Cost of Sales
95.18
95.55
96.00
Gross Profit
4.82
4.45
4.00
3.50
3.21
2.91
1.33
1.24
1.08
Finance Cost
0.75
0.65
0.97
0.58
0.60
0.11
Tax
0.16
0.15
0.03
Net Profit
0.42
0.45
0.08
Table 1 represents the relationship between sales (net revenue) and other variables in the
income statement with all the other variables represented as a percentage of the net revenue.
The vertical analysis considers the relationship between sales and other variables in the income
statement. The relationship of most of the variables in the income statement does not show an
impressive performance of the company judging from the figures from the table 1. Cost of sales
(which represents all the necessary cost incurred to bring the product to saleable points) as a
Page 3 of 22
percentage of sales has been on the high side at 95.18%, 95.55% and 96.00% in 2013, 2014
and 2015 respectively. This resorted in the low gross profit rate expressed as a percentage of
sales at 4.82%, 4.45%, and 4.00% in 2013, 2014, and 2015 respectively. Administration and
selling expenses fell throughout the three year period in terms of percentage to sales. Thus, it
only recorded 3.50% in 2013, 3.21% in 2014 and then 2.91% in 2015; this could not really
affect the operating profit (earnings before interest and tax) which also fell from 1.33% in 2013
to 1.08% in 2015 because of a corresponding increase in the percentage of cost of sales to the
sales. The unimpressive record resulted in a low record of net profit as a percentage to sales.
For this situation to change management must find measures to reduce the cost of sales of the
company. One way is to check the supply chain of the company and reduce any cumbersome
procedures adding unnecessary cost to the company. The suppliers could also be looked at, if
there is a sole supplier situation the company can find alternatives to save or reduce the cost of
the material in the situation. The company may need to improve on their negotiation abilities
or expertise aside looking at buying in bulk quantities from suppliers to potentially secure some
discounts.
120
VERTICAL ANALYSIS
120
100
100
2013
2014
2015
80
60
80
60
40
40
20
20
Page 4 of 22
Balance sheet
Table 2: Vertical analysis on Balance Sheet
2013
2014
2015
21.06
19.78
5.45
Inventories
65.81
62.26
70.80
Vat Accounts
4.35
3.06
5.98
Accounts Receivables
6.34
9.84
15.89
2.45
5.06
1.89
Accounts Payables
7.96
11.65
9.56
Taxation
0.80
1.73
0.48
Bank Overdraft
9.87
11.51
40.61
32.65
30.05
19.40
Directors Loan
31.75
26.48
17.09
Stated Capital
10.5
8.83
5.70
Income Surplus
6.39
9.74
7.17
The table 2 above shows a relationship between total assets and other components in the
balance sheet (statement of financial position) with all the other components represented as a
percentage of total assets. From the above table the non-current assets of the company have
been reducing from 21.06% in 2013, to 19.78% in 2014 then to 5.45% in 2015. This can be
due to depreciation of the non-current asset of the company or due to asset disposal by the
company.
It can also be seen from the table 2 that the company holds a lot of its assets in the form of
inventory in the three-year period from 2013 to 2015. The companys inventories as a
proportion of its total assets increased from 65.81% in 2013 to 62.26% in 2014 then to 70.80%
2015. The accounts receivables of the company also kept on increasing from 6.34%, to 9.84%
then to 15.89% of total assets in 2013, 2014 and 2015 respectively.
Page 5 of 22
Accounts payable of the company also increased from 7.96% in 2013 to 11.65% in 2014 but
fell to 9.56% in 2015. The increased in inventories and accounts receivables and the fall in the
accounts payable can account for the low percentage of the cash and bank balance position of
the company which increased from 2.45% in 2013 to 5.06% in 2014 but fell sharply to 1.89%
in 2015.
Figures in table 2 above also indicates that the company financed a greater percentage of its
total assets with debt, most of them being bank overdraft which increased from 9.87% to
11.51% then sharply to 40.61% of total asset in 2013, 2014 and 2015 respectively. Directors
current accounts declined from 32.65%, 30.05% to 19.40% in 2013, 2014, and 2015
respectively but still forms a greater percentage of the companys liabilities used to finance its
total assets. Directors loan which is the long-term liability of the company also reduced from
31.75% in 2013 to 17.09% in 2015. Equity form a lower percentage of the total assets financing
and even stated capital falling from 10.50% in 2013 to 5.70% in 2015. The income surplus of
the company increased from 6.39% in 2013 to 7.17% in 2015 but not enough to consolidate
the position of the companys equity.
TREND ANALYSES
Income Statement
Table 3: Trend analysis on Income Statement
2013
2014
2015
100
180.60
240.29
Cost of Sales
100
181.30
242.38
Gross Profit
100
166.62
199.04
100
165.59
200.28
100
169.33
195.77
Finance Cost
100
156.13
310.62
100
186.49
46.38
Tax
100
171.28
42.59
Net Profit
100
192.17
47.79
Page 6 of 22
The table 3 shows data that represents the growth in the companys operations over a threeyear period covering 2013 to 2015 with the performance in 2013 being the basis of
measurement. A careful investigation of the table 3 above indicates that the growth of the
company has been steadily over the three-year period under review.
throughout the three-year period, compared to the base year of 2013, it grew to 180.60% in
2014, thus showing 80.60% over that of 2013 then to 240.29% in 2015 which also shows over
140% of 2013. Cost of sales also grew to 181.30% in 2014 and then to 242.38% in 2015.
The administration and selling expenses of the company also followed the same pattern of the
net revenue and the cost of sales increasing to 165.59% in 2014 and then to 200.28% in 2015
with 2013 as the base year. From the table 3, though the net revenue increased over the period,
the increase in cost of sales and the administration and selling expenses caused the massive fall
in the profit. This resulted in profit recording only 192.17% in 2014 and a massive fall of profit
to only 47.79% compared to that of the base year.
350
Revenue ( Net
Revue)
300
Cost of Sales
250
percentage
Gross Profit
200
Administration and
Selling Expenses
Earnings before
Interest and Tax
150
Finance Cost
100
Profit/(Loss) after
Finance cost
50
Tax
Net Profit
2013
2008
2014
2009
2015
2010
years
2013
2014
2015
100.00
112.61
48.04
Inventories
100.00
113.43
199.86
Vat Accounts
100.00
84.23
255.07
Accounts Receivables
100.00
186.19
466.00
100.00
247.86
143.06
Accounts Payables
100.00
175.47
223.06
Taxation
100.00
258.47
110.39
Bank Overdraft
100.00
139.76
764.23
100.00
110.37
110.37
Directors Loan
100.00
100.00
100.00
Stated Capital
100.00
100.00
100.00
Income Surplus
100.00
182.86
208.57
The results from the above table 4 indicate that the company saw a marginal increase in noncurrent assets in 2014 to 112.61% but it declined massively in 2015 to 48.04%. This can be
due to disposal of the assets or the rates of depreciation on those assets are high. The account
receivables recorded the massive improvement in all the current assets which rose to 186.19%
in 2014 then to 466.00% in 2015. Inventories also recorded 113.43% in 2014 then to 199.86%
in 2015. Cash and bank balance rose to 247.86% in 2014 but fell to 143.06% in 2015. The
increase in the accounts receivables must be managed well to transform them to cash as quick
as possible to enhance the cash position of the company.
The account payables also followed a similar fashion of trend as those in the current assets. Its
recorded an increase to 175.47% in 2014 over that of the 2013 (ie. about 75.47% above that of
2013) and also to 233.06% in 2015. Even though the companys tax liability increased to
Page 8 of 22
258.47% in 2014, it fell to 110.39% in 2015. The bank overdraft increased to 139.76% in 2014
then increased as high as 764.23% in 2015 over that of 2013; indicating the companies over
reliance on liabilities for its operations.
A careful investigation of the results from the table 4 reveals that the company experienced
stagnant growth in both shareholders deposit and stated capital which registered a record of
100% throughout the period. The companys income surplus increased to 182.86% in 2014 and
then to 208.57% in 2015. The growth in income surplus of the company can be attributed to
the fact that for the three-year period there have always been 100% plough back in the
company.
Page 9 of 22
2014
2015
PROFITABILITY RATIO
0.42
0.45
0.08
4.82
4.45
4.00
Return on Assets
3.43
5.51
0.88
Return on Equity
20.00
30.00
7.00
LIQUIDITY RATIO
2013
2014
2015
Current Ratio
1.54:1
1.46:1
1.35:1
0.26:1
0.33:1
0.34:1
Cash Ratio
0.05:1
0.09:1
0.03:1
ACTIVITY RATIO
2013
2014
2015
28.96 days
18.19 days
24.09 days
Inventory Turnover
12.43
19.79
14.94
2.79 days
2.87 days
5.41 days
3.68 days
3.56 days
3.39 days
8.18 times
12.32 times
10.58 times
2013
2014
2015
83.00
81.00
87.00
Gearing ratio
187.10
142.62
132.83
Interest Cover
1.77
1.92
1.11
INVESTOR RATIO
2013
2014
2015
0.32
0.62
0.16
Page 10 of 22
PROFITABILITY RATIO
Measures of profitability indicate the capacity of an entity to make reasonable gains out of its
activities. Profitability ratios try to explain a companys ability to make the needed returns
given its shareholders equity, total assets and the relationship between returns and sales. The
profitability ratios from the table 5 above do not show a great performance of the company.
Even though the company recorded an increase in net profit margin from 0.42% in 2013 to
0.45% in 2014 this was still not good for the company to experience strong growth. In 2015
the net profit margin fell hugely to 0.08%. This can be attributed to the cost of sales recorded
by the company which on the average stood at about 95% (vertical analysis-income statement)
of net revenue of the period under review.
The unimpressive record of net profits recorded by the company over the three year period
translated into a low record of return on assets. Return on assets increased from 3.43% in 2013
to 5.51% in 2014 but fell to 0.88% in 2015. Return on equity gives an indication of the returns
enjoyed by shareholders on their investment over the period. This measure of the company
increased from 20.00% in 2013 to 30.00 in 2014 indicating a positive performance but the trend
of the other profitability ratios fell greatly in 2015 to 7%. Though the 2013 and 2014 return on
equity was good, that of 2015 was not impressive; recording only 7% in 2015. Management
should put measures in place to check on the profitability performance of the company. The
profitability performance of the company is shown in the chart 3 below.
35
30
Gross
Profit
Margin
Net Profit
Margin
percentage
25
20
15
Return on
Assets
10
5
Return on
Equity
2013
2008
2014
2009
Years
Page 11 of 22
2015
2010
LIQUIDITY RATIO
Liquidity is a measure of the ability of an organization to meet its current liabilities as and when
they fall due with its current assets base. Thus, the ratio depicts the firms ability to meet its
current liabilities without posing any threat to its current assets base. The liquidity position of
the company does not indicate a remarkable performance over the period under review. Current
ratio decreased from 1.54: 1, to 1.46:1 and then to 1.35:1 in 2013, 2014 and 2015 respectively.
Like the current ratio, the quick ratio even though increased from 0.26:1 in 2013 to 0.34:1 in
2015, it could not meet half of the current liabilities of the company. The quick ratio of the
company shows that the company could barely meet 40% of its current liabilities when they
fall due with its current assets components without its inventories.
LIQUIDITY RATIO
1.8
1.6
2013
2014
2015
1.4
1.2
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
Current Ratio
Cash Ratio
Page 12 of 22
The liquidity chart 4 above indicates that over the years current ratio declined but quick ratio
increased marginally.
ACTIVITY RATIO
Activity ratios are the category of ratios that seeks to assess the effectiveness and efficiency of
the firm taking into consideration how it uses its resources to generate revenue or sales. Thus,
measures of activity give an indication of how efficient the management of a company is in
utilizing its resources towards achieving the value maximization the companys goals.
Receivable collection period increased from 2.79 days in 2013 to 3.56 days in 2014 and further
increased to 5.41 days in 2015. Though the receivable collection period of the company are not
too bad but as compared to the creditors payment period the company should do well to reduce
it to enhance the cash flow of the company. The creditors payment period of the company
recorded a decrease from 3.68days in 2013 to 3.56 days in 2014 and also to 3.39 days. If the
reduction in the creditors payment period are due to discounts for early payments then that
should be encouraged but if not the company should check it.
The inventory holding period of the company was not impressive even though fell from 28.96
days in 2013 to 18.19 days in 2014 it increased again to 24.09 days. The inventory turnover
ratio increased from 12.43 times in 2013 which to 19.79 times in 2014. This reduced to 14.94
times in 2015 but was still better than that of the 2013. From the above its clear that converting
companys inventories into sales have been unstable. This development has the possibility to
affect the cash cycle period of the company and this might have resulted in the unimpressive
cash level record by the company.
The asset turnover record recorded by the company was better since its managed to use assets
to generate 8.18 times of sales in 2013, increased it to 12.32 times in 2014 but fell to 10.58 in
2015. This was still on a better side in terms of the company using its total assets to generate
sales. The situation of the activity ratio is indicated in the chart below.
Page 13 of 22
ACTIVITY RATIO
25
40
35
20
30
25
15
20
10
15
10
5
5
0
2013
2014
2015
Inventory Turnover
meet some debt payments. The chart below indicate that as the gearing ratio and debt to total
assets increases times interest earned decreases, this situation if continues will worsen the
riskiness of the firms.
SOLVENCY RATIO
200
2.5
2
150
1.5
100
1
50
0
0.5
2013
2014
Debt to Total Assets
Gearing ratio
2015
Interest Cover
INVESTMENT RATIO
0.62
0.32
0.16
2013
2008
2014
2009
Page 15 of 22
2015
2010
CONCLUSION
Checklulu Company Limited seems to have somewhat a good liquidity position but the
company may have some operational difficulties or challenges to deal with. The activity ratios
show poor or low efficiencies. High cost of sales coupled with corresponding low sales year
on year greatly affects the profitability of the company. The ability of the company to source
for long term finance is in doubt since the company already is highly geared.
Management is entreated to as mater of necessity and for ensuring the company continue in
business, to put in place measures to reduce high cost of sales while they work more efficiently
to improve sales volumes in subsequent years.
With an increase in revenue and a significant reduction in cost of goods (cost of sales) through
prudent, transparent and accountable supply and procurement processes, control of stock levels
and improved negotiation skills and closing good deals on cost of goods from suppliers, the
Checklulu Company Limited could surmount their financial and operational challenges and be
more profitable and appropriate value and sustain the business.
With a sum of 200 million based on the analysis and the proposed mitigation strategy for the
company, I would invest in Checklulu Company Limited with it current financial and
operational difficulties. There are still potential opportunities for Checklulu to grow given a
diligent, effective and efficient management review.
Page 16 of 22
Reference:
Annual Reports of CHECKLULU COMPANY LIMITED for 2015
Annual Reports of CHECKLULU COMPANY LIMITED for 2014
Annual Reports of CHECKLULU COMPANY LIMITED for 2013
Page 17 of 22
Appendix:
2013
2014
2015
GH
GH
GH
3864091
3677720
186371
6978406
6667874
310532
9284931
8913975
370956
135072
51299
29002
22297
6069
16228
223669
86863
45282
41581
10395
31186
270528
100428
90087
10341
2585
7756
99482
112023
47792
310896
20560
29932
11574
372962
472444
352638
17317
55730
28687
454372
566395
621351
52442
139483
16558
829834
877626
50000
30172
80172
50000
55174
105174
50000
62930
112930
37610
3800
46632
154230
242272
150000
392272
472444
65994
9826
65171
170230
311221
150000
461221
566395
83893
4195
356378
170230
614696
150000
764696
877626
Page 18 of 22
Income Statement
Vertical Analysis
Trend Analysis
2013
2014
2015
2013
2014
2015
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
180.60
240.29
95.18
95.55
96.00
100.00
181.30
242.38
Gross Profit
4.82
4.45
4.00
100.00
166.62
199.04
3.50
3.21
2.91
100.00
165.59
200.28
EBIT
1.33
1.24
1.08
100.00
169.33
195.77
Finance Cost
0.75
0.65
0.97
100.00
156.13
310.62
Profit/Loss
0.58
0.60
0.11
100.00
186.49
46.38
Tax
0.16
0.15
0.03
100.00
171.28
42.59
Net Profit/Loss
0.42
0.45
0.08
100.00
192.17
47.79
21.06
19.78
5.45
100.00
112.61
48.04
Inventories
65.81
62.26
70.80
100.00
113.43
199.86
Vat Account
4.35
3.06
5.98
100.00
84.23
255.07
Accounts Receivables
6.34
9.84
15.89
100.00
186.19
466.00
2.45
5.06
1.89
100.00
247.86
143.06
78.94
80.22
94.55
100.00
121.83
222.50
Total Assets
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
119.89
185.76
Stated Capital
10.58
8.83
5.70
100.00
100.00
100.00
Income Surplus
6.39
9.74
7.17
100.00
182.86
208.57
Total Equity
16.97
18.57
12.87
100.00
131.19
140.86
Accounts Payable
7.96
11.65
9.56
100.00
175.47
223.06
Taxation
0.80
1.73
0.48
100.00
258.58
110.39
Bank Overdraft
9.87
11.51
40.61
100.00
139.76
764.23
32.65
30.05
19.40
100.00
110.37
110.37
51.28
54.95
70.04
100.00
128.46
253.72
Directors Loan
31.75
26.48
17.09
100.00
100.00
100.00
Total Liabilities
83.03
81.43
87.13
100.00
117.58
194.94
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
119.89
185.76
Liabilities
Page 19 of 22
LIQUIDITY RATIO
2013
2014
2015
Current Asset
372,962
454,372
829,834
Current Liability
242,272
311,221
614,696
1.54:1
1.46:1
1.35:1
62,066
101,734
208,483
Current Liability
242,272
311,221
614,696
0.26:1
0.33:1
0.34:1
11,574
28,687
16,558
Current Liabilities
242,272
311,221
614,696
0.05:1
0.09:1
0.03:1
310,896 * 360
352,638 * 360
621,351*360
Sales
3,864,091
6,978,406
9,284,931
Current Ratio
Cash Ratio
ACTIVITY RATIO
Inventory Holding Period
28.96
18.19
24.09
Inventory Turnover
Sales
3,864,091
6,978,406
9,284,931
Inventory
310,896
352,638
621,351
12.43
19.79
14.94
29,932 * 360
55,730 * 360
139,483 *360
Sales
3,864,091
6,978,406
9,284,931
2.79
2.87
5.41
37,610 *360
65,994 *360
83,893 *360
Cost of Sales
3,677,720
6,667,874
8,913,975
3.68
3.56
3.39
Sales
3,864,091
6,978,406
9,284,931
Total Asset
472,444
566,395
877,626
8.18 times
12.32 times
10.58 times
Page 20 of 22
SOLVENCY
Debt to Total Assets
Total Debt * 100
392,272 *100
461,221 *100
764,696 *100
Total Assets
472,444
566,395
877,626
83%
81%
87%
Gearing ratio
Long term Debt * 100
150,000 *100
150,000 *100
150,000 *100
Total Equity
80,172
105,174
112,930
187.10%
142.62%
132.83%
Interest Cover
EBIT
51,299
Int. Payment
29,002
86,863
100,428
45,282
90,087
1.77 times
1.92 times
1.11 times
16,228 *100
31,186 *100
7,756*100
Sales
3,864,091
6,978,406
9,284,931
PROFITABILITY RATIO
Net profit margin
0.42%
0.45%
0.08%
186,371 *100
310,532 *100
370,956 *100
Sales
3,864,091
6,978,406
9,284,931
4.82%
4.45%
4.00%
Return on Assets
Net profit * 100
16,228 *100
31,186*100
7,756*100
Total Assets
472,444
566,395
877,626
3.43%
5.51%
0.88%
Return on Equity
Net profit * 100
16,228*100
31,186 *100
7,756*100
Total Equity
80,172
105,174
112,930
20.00%
Page 21 of 22
30.00%
7.00%
INVESTMENT RATIO
Earnings per Share
Net Profit
16,228
31,186
7,756
50,000
50,000
50,000
0.32
0.62
Page 22 of 22
0.16