Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Cycle time for in-situ RC high-rise building using conventional FW: 13-16d
- For Factory: 4m
1/3 of a beam
Consider pre-stressed concrete length for work. The pour strip is a natural division.
Consider access when sequencing construction zones (not to block the access)
“Wet” first then “Dry”. That is to say, for a room or a confined space, start “wet” trades
(skim coat, plastering, floor screeding, tiling, marbling, etc.), then “dry” trades (partition,
carpentry work, steel work, etc.).
“Top” first then “down”. For several concurrently running “wet” trades or “dry” trades,
work starts from the ceiling, to the wall, to the kicker and floor. For example, normally, do
suspended ceiling first, then do floor marble and tiles. This is because the finishing sealant to
the ceiling panel is somehow a “wet” trade, and may drop down to the floor.
Two types of external finishes: “wet” and “dry”. “Wet” refers to the traditional painting,
and “dry” refer to the envelope type of curtain structure attached to the structure, such as
cladding stone, curtain wall, etc.
Vertically, for a high-rise building, it may divide the whole external wall into several
“zones” and separate them with temporary protection platform. Sequence is always from the
top to down.
7 General M&E Works Sequence
From the view of the system, the M&E works can be categorized as plumbing and sanitary
works, electrical works, mechanical ventilation and air-conditioning and fire protection
system.
From the view of the actual work, the M&E works can be sequenced as: sleeve penetration
and embedded components > metal work (tray, channel, etc.) and piping > cable pulling >
equipment installation.
Penetration and embedded components start with the structural works. Piping underneath
the ceiling and along the wall starts with the brickwork.
Note: the commencement of design may be earlier than the award of contract by 2m.
9 Standard Completion Stage
10 Standard Procedures for Material and Shop Drawing
Preparation, Submission and Approval for Architectural Works
11 Standard Procedures for Material and Shop Drawing
Preparation, Submission and Approval for M&E Works
How to Evaluate a Programme
INTRODUCTION
Working out a master programme is a challenge. More often than not, it is like the planner's
craftwork to satisfy all parties' requirements, be it contractual key dates, sequence of work, cost
and resource balance. When it comes to evaluate the programme, the planner must be able to
present his works in clear, concise and understandable terms to his bosses as well as co-workers.
Since programming is a highly specialized work, communication is important to get common
understanding among all team players. Though there is no such standard to evaluate a
programme, still there is some kind of normal practice around in this field. The followings are
the writer's views.
How many times have you seen the A1 sized bar chart pasted on the meeting room wall for
months, and in the end nobody bothers to look at it? To make the programme useful, the
management system shall be set up first. The programme fundamentally shall be from the guys
who will use the programme and who are to implement it. The planner is merely the "facilitator"
from this point of view. Since there are so many guys with different disciplines and background,
the planner shall be able to sort the thing out, organize the thing in logic order and present the
thing to get common understand. Also, before the programme is ready to go, all concerned
parties must sign off the programme to commit it. Proper documented procedures must be
established to make this happen.
-The programme shall be developed from the framework of the contractual key dates. If the
contractor's key dates are planned earlier than the contractual key dates, no critical path appears
(the critical path is on the contractual key dates which are assigned "finish no early than" and
"finish no later than" constraints).
-The programme shall be complete. From the view of the project life, it shall include submission
and approval (shop drawings, method statement, relevant approving authorities), procurement /
manufacturing / fabrication / delivery, mobilization, construction and installation, testing and
commissioning.
-Is critical path or near critical path make sense based on past experience, method statement and
common sense? Here the judgment plays a role because we know before programming that some
area of works falls on the critical path.
-Are there artificial leads or lags and constraints? User assigned lead / lag time and constraints
override the network logic in calculating early and late dates and float. Constraints are only used
when the contract specifies.
-Theoretically, there shall be no open activities except for the start and finish key dates. That is
to say, only one entrance and one exit to go through the programme. In other words, the very
start activity has no predecessor, and the last activity has no successor. All activities but the very
first and last shall have both predecessor and successor. In actual job, this rule is sometimes
difficult to follow unless the programme is pretty small. Early start constraint has to be assigned
to the "very hard to decide" activity where its predecessor is difficult to define.
-Most activities shall have only one predecessor and one successor, or in some cases, only have
soft (resource constraint) and hard (logic constraint) links. Too many predecessor and successor
tend to confuse the logic.
-Most activities relationship shall be in FS (the conventional way) and it depicts the sequence of
works in the network. The more detailed the programme is, the more activities use FS
relationship.
-Grouping under one activity code's value by summarizing (e.g. "Location" or "area") shall not
have unnecessary gap. This means, the work shall be carried on smoothly without interruption.
-Duration can not be too long or too short. This means that the programme shall have reasonable
degree of detail. Similarly to the resource and cost allocation.
-The resource envelope formed by planned early and late curve shall be typical, meaning, can not
be too "fat" or too "thin". This is controlled by duration and total float.
-Description shall be specific enough, that is, not relying on the activity code, one can understand
the scope of work.
-Use the milestone to transfer the interface key dates from one stage to another or for different
areas of work.
-Add log notes after description on the bar to explain the planner's intention.
All these criteria are guidelines only. Sometimes the planner must compromise one aspect of
criteria in order to meet the other. It is like artwork in this sense.
Resource under P3
Concept
Define Resource under Apply Resource to an
"Data" activity
Resource Unit Manhours or "Hrs" in short
Resource Production:
1) Rate: Unit per day (Hrs/d)
2) Budgeted Quantity Hrs
Resource Limit Hrs / d
Resource Price:
1) Rate: $ / Hrs
2) Budgeted Cost $
Example
Take sample file "APEX" for instance. Activity ID “AS310” and description “Site Preparation”.
Limit: 8 Hrs / d
Price: $17 / Hrs
OD: 10d
OD=10d
Pct=80%
To complete=BC-544=680-544=$136
To complete=BQ-32=40-32=8 Hrs
Schedulin
g
Resource
Cost
Resource Profile
Resource Usage
Resource Limit
Earn Value
• Earn value for resource: BQWP=Budgeted Quantity for Work Performed=Actual to date
(resource)
• Earn value for cost: BCWP=Budgeted Cost for Work Performed=Actual to date (cost)