Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Secrtaires de la rdaction
2015
(172e volume)
A hoard of early Byzantine gold coins was found in 1994 at Gkler (Ktahya
district), in the ancient province of Phrygia. Although ancient remains have
been reported in the past, no systematic excavations have been conducted so far
at Gkler.1 The modern village is located ca. 10 km east of Gediz (ancient Kadoi)
off the main highway going east to Ktahya (ancient Kotyaeion), a town with
a rich history spanning several millennia. In the same region of Kotyaeion
an early Christian church and a Byzantine fortification are currently being
excavated at Aslanapa and Simav, respectively. In addition, some 50 km southwest of Ktahya excavations are being conducted at avdarhisar (ancient Aizanoi)
where the Late Antique layers have already yielded a significant number of coins.2
Aside from 14 sixth-century gold coins with unknown provenance, the collection
*Anadolu University, Art History Department, 26470 Yunusemre Campus, Eskiehir, Turkey.
Email: zdgokalp@anadolu.edu.tr.
**University of Alabama in Huntsville, History Department, Roberts Hall, Huntsville,
AL 35899, USA. Email: andrei.gandila@uah.edu.
1.Belke, Mersich 1990, p.261.
2.Kker 2013, p.133-151.
RN 2015, p. 317-335
318
of the Ktahya Museum includes no less than 1250 Byzantine bronze coins,
of which 296 are sixth-century issues, most of them found on the territory of
ancient Phrygia.3
The Gkler hoard was found in circumstances unfortunately all too common
in the last decades, by illegal prospections with the metal detector. Investigations conducted by the local authorities between 1994 and 1996 have revealed
the fact that an unknown number of coins, possibly belonging to the hoard, had
been smuggled abroad and sold to a German collector.4 Although the 59 coins
(247.7g total) now in the Ktahya Museum may represent an incomplete hoard,
the selection of pieces removed from the hoard seems to have been done randomly
by the two illegal metal detectorists, who clearly knew little to nothing about
Byzantine gold coins. This explains why the treasure hunters left untouched
the most valuable coins of the hoard, the two rare and highly collectible lightweight solidi of Maurice. Moreover, the age structure of the hoard is quite typical
for accumulations closed towards the end of the sixth century, which lends
some credibility to the statistical charts proposed below.
Many of the coins are uncirculated, some still retaining the original mint luster,
although quite a few are struck with worn or even cracked dies. The average
weight of the regular solidi is 4.47g, close to the 24-carat standard, with
the heaviest weighing 4.51g and the lightest 4.31g (figure 3).5 Several coins
of Maurice have test marks on the center, a practice known from other hoards
as well (nos. 30, 38 and 45).6 The hoard covers several decades, from Justinian
to Maurice, which is common for medium-sized hoards of this period. Due to
the broad dating of solidi of Justinian and Maurice, the emperors who enjoyed
the longest reigns of the sixth-century, we are unable to determine a more precise
chronology. The actual age span of the hoard can be as short as two decades
(c. 565-585) or as long as five (c. 542-592) (figure 1).
From a numismatic perspective the hoard found at Gkler presents a number
of interesting peculiarities. The most unusual feature is the presence of seven
die-linked solidi of Justinian in a hoard concealed as late as five decades later,
towards the end of the century. The obverse portrait corresponds to MIBE 75
and 76, which Wolfgang Hahn dates to the second half of the reign. Three obverse
dies and three reverse dies were used to strike the seven coins, all from officina .
3.The coins have been studied by Zeliha Demirel Gkalp in 2013 at the Ktahya Museum.
This study was carried out under the Project no. 1208E123 submitted to Anadolu University
Council of Scientific Research Projects.
4.The authors wish to thank Recep Karaca (Ktahya Museum) for information regarding
the investigation.
5.Elaborate metrological calculations do not seem warranted for our hoard, but they have been
done with important results for larger hoards published in the past, most of them seventh-century
accumulations, such as Nikertai, Beth Shean, Limassol, Rougga, and Aydin, to name only the
most significant.
6.See for example Ahipaz 2007, p.159.
RN 2015, p. 317-335
Emperor
Date
Solidus
23-sil. solidus
Semissis
Tremissis
319
Total
Justinian I
545-565
7/11.87%
Justin II
565-567
567-578
1
2
1
2
3/5.08%
Tiberius II
578-582
5/8.48%
582
582-583
583-602
1
8
27
1
8
36
45/76.27%
51
59
59/100%
Maurice
Total