Literacy Piece

by Markita Ward

FILE

MARKIT A_WARD_ASSIGNMENT _2.DOCX (13.17K)

T IME SUBMIT T ED

28-OCT -2016 09:30AM

WORD COUNT

486

SUBMISSION ID

728226187

CHARACT ER COUNT

1986

Literacy Piece
GRADEMARK REPORT
FINAL GRADE

GENERAL COMMENTS

65

Instructor

PAGE 1
PAGE 2

T his earns a grade of 75, but drops to a 65 because

it was submitted late.
A voice comment was left for this paper.

/100

RUBRIC: WORKING DRAFT 1:LIT NARRATIVE

PROCESS

Lacking

PROCESS As a working draf t, piece shows:

EXEMPLARY

Process work is present and provides robust evidence that student has participated;
Clear evidence of strong idea development; Robust evidence of revision (changes in
draf ts) is clearly present

PROFICIENT

Process work is present and evidence of participation is clear; Evidence of idea

development is present; Evidence of ef f ective revision is clearly present

DEVELOPING

Some evidence of process work; Attempts at idea development, but ideas are lacking
in some way; Little evidence of revision is present

LACKING

Participation in process work, development of ideas, and/or evidence of revision is

incomplete or insuf f icient

RHET ORICAL

Lacking

RHET ORICAL KNOWLEDGE As a working draf t, piece shows:

EXEMPLARY

Writer has f ulf illed the assignment beyond expectations; Exceptionally clear purpose;
Excellent attention to audience through word choice and vivid details of ideas

PROFICIENT

Writer has clearly f ulf illed the assignment; Clear purpose; Good attention to audience
through word choice and vivid details of ideas

DEVELOPING

Writer has f ulf illed the assignment; Purpose is hard to decipher or not yet clear; Little
evidence of attention to audience due to too abstract or non-specif ic details

LACKING

T his aspect of the piece is incomplete/ insuf f icient. Work shows little to no evidence
of rhetorical knowledge

CRIT ICAL

Lacking

CRIT ICAL T HINKING AND WRIT ING GROWT H As a working draf t, piece shows:
EXEMPLARY

Exceptional use of tone and voice; Robust attempts to be appealing and interesting
according to audience and purpose; Writer clearly is taking risks; Ref lective letter is
included and clearly addresses these aspects of piece

PROFICIENT

Clear attempts to use tone and voice; Clear attempts to be appealing and interesting
according to audience and purpose; Writer is taking some risks; Ref lective letter is
included and suf f iciently addresses these aspects of piece

DEVELOPING

Writer is struggling to use/understand tone and voice, to create interesting writing,

and/or to take risks; Ref lective letter is missing or does not clearly addresses these
aspects of piece

LACKING

Write made little to no attempts to present critical thinking or writing growth; No

ref lective letter included

CONVENT IONS

Prof icient

KNOWLEDGE OF CONVENT IONS As a working draf t, piece shows:

EXEMPLARY

Exceptional and adept wording and phrasing; Little to no issues in readability; Writer
displays clear control over mechanics, grammar, and usage

PROFICIENT

Good wording and phrasing; Little to no issues in readability; Writer displays control
over mechanics, grammar, and usage

DEVELOPING

Some or repeated issues with awkward or inef f ective wording/phrasing; Writer

displays lack of control over mechanics, grammar, and usage, causing issues in
readability

LACKING

Glaring issues/errors in grammar, capitalization, punctuation, spelling, and other

conventions; Piece is dif f icult to read; Little to no attention has been given to
conventions of writing