Modern Planning in Pakistan and Abroad

Architecture & Town Planning (CE - 4702)
HAND OUT 5
MODERN PLANNING IN PAKISTAN AND ABROAD

Introduction:
Before beginning of description about, Modern Planning in Pakistan and Abroad it is important to
understand the term Modern and the phrase Modern Planning. The understanding of these two concepts
would lead us to make the beginning of this topic. Secondly it would be interesting to develop a historical
perspective of planning attempts made abroad in western world and then in Pakistan. Particularly; with
reference to Master Planning, development of planning institutions in Pakistan and development pattern of
settlements in major cities and towns of Pakistan would clearly spell out the theme of current lecture.
Modernity and Modern:
Modernity is a term that refers to the modern era. It is distinct from modernism, and, in different contexts,
refers to cultural and intellectual movements of the period c. 1630-1940. The term "modern" can refer to many
different things. Colloquially, it can refer in a general manner to the 20th century. For historians, the Early
Modern Period refers to the period roughly from 1500 to 1800, with the Modern era beginning sometime
during the 18th century. In this schema, industrialization during the 19th century marks the first phase of
modernity, while the 20th century marks the second. Some schools of thought hold that modernity ended in
the late 20th century, replaced by post-modernity, while others would extend modernity to cover the
developments denoted by post-modernity and into the present.[1]
Modernism and Modern Planning:
Modernism describes an array of cultural movements rooted in the changes in Western society in the late
nineteenth and early twentieth century. The term covers a series of reforming movements in art, architecture,
music, literature and the applied arts which emerged during this period. At its most basic level, Modernism
could be described as the experimentation and fragmentation of the human experience, characterized by
deviations from the norms of society.[2]
It wasn't until the 1920s that modernism began to surface. Based on the ideas of Le Corbusier and utilising
new skyscraper building techniques, the modernist city stood for the elimination of disorder, congestion and
the small scale, replacing them instead with preplanned and widely spaced freeways and tower blocks set
within gardens.
There were plans for large scale rebuilding of cities, such as the Plan Voisin (based on Le Corbusier's Ville
Contemporaine), which proposed clearing and rebuilding most of central Paris. No large-scale plans were
implemented until after World War II however. Throughout the late 1940s and 1950s, housing shortages
caused by war destruction led many cities around the world to build substantial amounts of governmentsubsidized housing blocks. Planners at the time used the opportunity to implement the modernist ideal of
towers surrounded by gardens. The most prominent example of an entire modernist city is Brasilia,
constructed between 1956 and 1960 in Brazil.
By the late 1960s and early 1970s, many planners were coming to realize that the imposition of modernist
clean lines and a lack of human scale also tended to sap vitality from the community. This was expressed in
high crime and social problems within many of these planned neighbourhoods. Modernism can be said to have
ended in the 1970s when the construction of the cheap, uniform tower blocks ended in many countries, such as
Britain and France. Since then many have been demolished and in their way more conventional housing has
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Lahore (UOL), Lahore, Pak
Course Coordinator: Asst. Prof. Rehan Masood
HAND OUT 5
been built. Rather than attempting to eliminate all disorder, planning now concentrates on individualism and
diversity in society and the economy. This is the post-modernist era.[3]
Modern Planning Abroad:
In order to understand the modern planning abroad one may refer to encyclopedia of urban planning by
Whittick Arnold and read the contemporary theories and practices in the western world. It narrates that since
16th century the mode of planning cities is divided in seven main categories.
i. The Authoritarian Planning
ii. The Utilitarian Planning
iii. The Romantic Planning
iv. The Utopian Planning
v. The Technocratic Utopia
vi. The Technocratic Planning
vii. The Organic Planning
Following is the detailed description of these planning types.
Authoritarian Planning:
It is basically a geometric planning which emerged in 16th century onwards under priestly dictators &
absolute monarchs who wanted to create an urban setting which can emphasize their power structure in
society. The principles of this kind of planning include a long street, uniform blank front and an open plaza for
a monument or obelisk. However, when same principles applied to city as a whole as a ideal geometric
plans for political capitals i.e. Washington, Brasilia, Islamabad the plan become truly functional setting only
for government. Such design of cities can only be maintained through legal regulations and in long run it must
be modified & rebuild. Because these plans are made by ignoring social & economic needs. The major fault in
authoritarian planning is not in its geometry but false assumptions of centralized power that ignores the
important functions of neighborhoods. Although the authoritarian planning neglects the essential functions of
city, however the gift that occurs through geometric scheme is of parks and open spaces; or a main boulevard
or some important roads. The most striking example of authoritarian planning is in Baroque, which is a star
like fortification which is the only and ephemeral contribution of geometric planning.
The basic element in geometric planning is a square or rectangular blocks with streets and avenues composed
by assembling and extending such blocks. The major advantage of this grid iron plan is open spaces provided
as a setting for major public buildings. The disadvantage of this planning is the automatic extension by this
method that raise the cost by increasing the number and area for unnecessary streets & pavements whose
services crates a heavy burden on municipality, because they have to provide transportation facilities water,
sewerage, schools & health facilities for whole area.
The Utilitarian Planning:
With the continuation geometric planning there emerges the utilitarian planning which are basically the
repercussions of geometric extension of the town. It is also termed as commercial utilitarian planning because
its major objective is to maximize the returns from sale & rent. Since last three centuries large number of new
towns or town extensions developed on this theory that the ideal municipal facilities should be provided on
open land where the large population to be housed with maximum use of available space for built structures &
minimum space availability for parks, play ground & open public spaces. The other aspect of utilitarian
planning is the encouragement of private sector investments in the development. On paper the grid iron plan
HAND OUT 5
shows a strict order & harmony of built structures. However the three dimensional building structures when
emerged out of these plans it shows a monotonous & confusing pattern with too many similar open spaces,
streets & avenues.
The utilitarian planning has been carried out on day to day basis by the municipal engineer, the land
developer, the transportation expert, the commercial builder and real estate investor with no thought of public
welfare or municipal economy. Originally the utilitarian planning is the product of laissez faire economics
which assumes that order & purpose would emerge out of unrestricted private competition. The utilitarian
planning also concentrate on increasing the mechanical facilities to accommodate expanding population with
the sacrifice of other social functions. Therefore utilitarian planning lead to misuse of whole environment, i.e.
the sewerage & industrial waste poured into near by water channels which destroy a vital recreational space.
The utilitarian planning leads to the profit making process, and the result of utilitarian planning emerges in the
form of inefficient urban spaces, congestion, more built up areas then open spaces and lacking of domestic
amenities. Considering these repercussions of utilitarian planning it is quite vital that it should be regulated
and a coherent pattern should be superimposed upon its random structures. It requires a series of municipal
regulations to control the land uses through limitations of heights & density of buildings. Therefore zoning
regulations are quite vital to curb the utilitarian planning.
Romantic Planning:
When the utilitarian planning practice become supreme in cities, there occurred a revolt against it and a new
philosophy took shape in the form of a Romantic movement in city planning. The Romantic planning rejects
the concepts of life that makes a human being & its environment subservient to either political power structure
or mechanization in the development of a city. Positively the Romantic Movement in planning restored the
essential human values excluded from the industrial and autocratic complex. These human values were
associated with rural life with more open spaces, clean air sunlight, vegetation & other rural habitat which is
favorable for a child to grow in a healthy environment. Simultaneously the romanticism in planning restored
the historic continuity to urban forms and institutions which was destroyed for private profit.
The Romantic Movement restored the historic heritage through fresh appreciation of natural landscape which
was quite different from the formal geometric patterns. In Romantic planning they abandon the repetitive
blocks, unbroken street fronts and created for large units and designed such roads that confirm their width &
pavements, as per population and traffic density. They followed contours instead of grading the land. The
romantic planner reduced the cost of development and was able to afford more open space for gardens. In this
way he beats the utilitarian planner at his own financial game. The other innovation in urban design that was
derived from romantic planning movement is of a Super Block. It was spontaneously introduced in a Boston
area around the middle of 19th century. The super block is not merely a greatly enlarged dimension of usual
rectangular block but instead of placing houses only on perimeter it grouped them in cul-de-sacs & clusters.
The effect that emerged out of super block is reduction of needless traffic streets, increase in the area of
gardens & parks an assurance of greater privacy and quite environment. From historical point of view the
Romantic Movement was developed in a theory by Camillo Sitte in his work entitled, the art of building
cities. In his book Sitte examined that medieval and renaissance city and proved its aesthetic failure due to
more rigid kind of geometric planning, with overemphasis on symmetry, uniformity & centralization. Mr.
Sitte; shown that irregularity in placing public movements increase its aesthetics where both aesthetically &
socially attractive than large avenues framed by uniform buildings designed to increase the speed of vehicles
& machine like precision. Mr. Camillo Sitte contributed the concept of diversified neighborhoods, markets,
squares & green open spaces rather than uniform avenues & block as the basic unit of planning. These
principles were further elaborated by Mr.: Robert Unwin in his book Town planning in practice in 1909 as
well as in his own planning.
HAND OUT 5
Utopian Planning:
The Utopian planning at first refers to the Thomas Moores classic work of Utopia in which he exhibits the
elements of all three types of Authoritarian, utilitarian and romantic planning. However as an expression his
work discussed about a centralized political authority & geometric formalism as well as his humane views on
city in which he describes a neighborhood unit as a center of domestic and civic life. A part from Thomas
Moore there is other Utopian planners who have given their concepts on utopian city or an ideal city both in
form and function. Such as Robert Owen given an ideal scheme of New Lanark, savannah, Georgia &
Melbourne with a large surrounding green belt. Then there is Mr. Walter Burley Griffin who planned the
capital of Australia, Canberra in which he suggested the generous scale of suburban planning to new
metropolitan. Then came; the Franck Lloyd Wrights scheme for Broad Acre city where each family gets 13
acres of land within a rigid Grid of lots & roads. The other characteristic of Utopian planning was evident
from the work of James silk Buckinghams concept of Victoria and Richardsons ideal town of Hygiene.
Thus the concept of ideal town Utopia was carried out to such extreme that it has ultimately became utopia or
no place.
The most successful example of utopia urban planning was that of Sir Ebenezer Howards project of Garden
city, in which the out line & intention was purely an urban life with its social and economic diversity. In
theory the Ebenezer Howard clearly spell out the limitations of authoritarian, utilitarian and utopian planning,
however his concepts were basically of an organic planning. His explanatory diagrams were not in any sense a
town plan but the later addition of shopping mall & neighborhood unit that developed until 1947 shown a
basis for new town design. Before going into details of his ideals of organic planning one must understand the
mechanical by-product of utopian theory i.e. the technocratic planning.
Technocratic Utopia:
The terms technocratic utopia was first brought into literature by Bowler Litton through his work The
Coming Race. The inhabitance of this utopia lived underground & utilizes nuclear energy for both work and
destruction. In this kind of utopia all human functions and activities was set up in a large mega structure where
every detail of life is subject to absolute autocratic control. The technocratic plan mainly centered on the
technological inventions in construction method & materials where as the organization of city will be on a
linear pattern along a spinal transportation artery which forms continuous horizontal zones on both sides. Or
the creation of simple vertical structure of hundred or two hundred stories high. The most popular and
influential form of technocratic ideal was of Le Corbusier in The City of the Future first published in 1924
as urbanism. In his conceptual proposal of Paris Le Corbusier formed a central core of office buildings 60
stories high, widely separated and served by multiple to similar apartment houses. Basically his concept
addressed the contemporary urban real estate speculation, autocratic as his city of future.
Technocratic Planning:
The technocratic planning describes a process which is going on from last one century; where mechanical
services are increasing with huge costs for providing water from distant sources, disposal system of sewerage
& garbage, paved streets, rapid transportation systems, tunnels, bridges, multilane highways & large parking
lots. The aim of technocratic planning & ideas is to make every urban activity, a function of a machine. In
theory technocratic planning assumes that all human problems are open to a technological solution and all
human needs can be met by invention of a mechanical or electronic device that can stimulate them & satisfy
them or divert them to other channels. The technocratic planning suggests the projects for great urban mega
structures, underwater, under ground or a mile high tower in the air with maximized totalitarian control.
Therefore if the technocratic planning would be widely adopted it would spell out the end of a city and
permanently banish the art of town planning.
HAND OUT 5
Organic Planning:
The concepts of organic planning sprung out from rich knowledge of urban past and better sociological
understanding of the nature of cities. These are not considered as a work of art but the focal point in
development and expression of a culture. The organic means well organized with a dynamic balance.
Therefore organic planning seeks structural answer to every function of city which is expressed in both
surface plan & design of buildings with needs & ideals of a community. The organic planning conserves past
urban forms & prepares them to accommodate future needs. For example the garden city plan of Ebenezer
Howard is the first diagrammatic expression of organic form. The principles of organic planning never been
formulated completely. Because they embody such urban complexity which can not be expressed on a purely
two-dimensional plan; whereas even in three dimensional additions of building structures still the 4th
dimension of time remains ill accounted. The essential nature of the organic planning can be best revealed
through historic cities in which growth and development takes place throughout centuries with the 4th
dimension of time i.e. Venice, Rome, New Delhi & Mecca can be the best examples. Successive generations
starting city building from one point to another through gradual improvement & addition is the specialty of
organic planning in which the need plays an important role in the style of a particular era. Because no single
generation, no single mind, no single architect or planner could have forecast and designed the final result of
the city design. Finally one must not forget the work of Sir Patrick Geddes who was by profession a biologist
but made conscious efforts to develop theory of organic planning.
In his reports on Indian cities he showed how much richer the texture of city became when all its functions
like civic, religious, domestic & economic were tactfully embraced & integrated in city design He describes
that organic planning requires an intimate knowledge of urban culture, human needs, purposes & means with
cooperative participation & critical judgment by the community while new plans for city are under process. If
modern technology releases working time for such joint civic enterprises, the organic may replace utilitarian,
autocratic and technocratic planning as a new order of today.
Modern Planning in Pakistan:
The issue of modern planning in Pakistan is a little bit complex because there is no book available on this
issue till date that describes modern planning in Pakistan. There are different authors/ researchers of urban
planning in Pakistan who have generated different research papers that are not directly related to this topic but
contain some relevant data or allied information. In the following the description of such endeavors is outlined
in a logical manner so as the reader may understand the complexity of this issue.
Master Planning in Pakistan A Historical Perspective[4]

Legal Framework:
There has been no Town and Country Planning law at national level in Pakistan. In the beginning, the only
legislation with provision for the preparation of master plans by local councils was the Municipal
Administration Ordinance (MAO) 1960. However, this Ordinance did not say anything about plan sanctioning
and implementing authorities. Nor it contained any provisions requiring the revision of the plans as and when
needed. The MAO 1960 was replaced by Provincial Local Government Ordinance (PLGO) 1979. It simply
carried forward the provisions of MAO 1960 about master planning in almost the same words. Like the MAO
1960, only the urban local councils were required to prepare master plans for their jurisdiction under the
PLGO 1979 and it was also not mandatory to do so. Thus rural areas of the country received no planning
attention even under this Ordinance. However, it was in 1997 when the rural local councils were also given a
non mandatory task to prepare and implement master plans for areas under their jurisdiction. Unfortunately,
HAND OUT 5
none of the rural local councils could prepare any master plan due mainly to lack of interest of decision
makers, and weak institutional capacity.
Recently, the Local Government Ordinance 2001 has replaced the PLGO 1979 as part of the devolution plan
of the current military regime. Under the 2001 Ordinance, a new system of Local Government has been
established, creating three tiers of local government administration. Each province has been divided into
Districts by eliminating the previous rural-urban divide. Each district comprises a few Tehsils/Towns which
are again divided into areas of Union Councils. Staff at each administrative level has been appointed by
abolition and merger of different existing institutions functioning at provincial and local levels, for better
governance at the local level. Thus the Tehsil Municipal Administrations (TMA) has replaced the urban (e.g.
Municipal/Town Committees) and rural (e.g. Zila Councils) local councils. All the TMAs in a district are
administratively linked with District Government. However, in case of provincial capitals, a City District
Government (CDG) has been established by dividing the city into different Town Municipal Administrations.
Under the 2001 Ordinance, all the TMAs are required to prepare a master plan for their respective areas and
get it approved from their respective Councils. However, this Ordinance does not provide for spatial planning
at the district level.
Provisions for master planning can also be found as one of the function of various development authorities or
planning agencies in their respective Acts / Ordinances under which these authorities or agencies were created
primarily in large cities. For example, these include Karachi Development (KDA) Authority Order 1957,
Lahore Development Authority (LDA) Act 1975, and Quetta Development Authority Ordinance 1978. Until
recently these development authorities have been working in parallel with local government institutions often
with overlapping jurisdictions and duplication of planning powers. Since the reorganization of local
government in 2001, these development authorities have been made part of the District Government but as a
separate entity.
Preparation and Implementation of Master Plans
Recognizing the need to arrest the ugliness and haphazard growth of big cities of Pakistan and to guide the
future development in a planned manner, the Government of Pakistan envisaged in the second five year plan
(1960-65) the need of preparation of master plans for eleven major cities in the then West Pakistan. Lahore
being the provincial metropolis of the biggest province topped the list of selected cities. Hence, the
preparation of Master Plan for Greater Lahore marked the beginning of master planning in Pakistan in 1961.
The second Master plan was prepared for Karachi during 1970 to 1974.[5] Afterwards a number of master
plans have also been produced for various cities of the country including, for instance, Quetta, Peshawar,
Rawalpindi, Faisalabad and Multan. A brief review of some of these master plans suggests that these have
adopted the most conventional notion of planning process by Patrick Geddes,[6]that is:
Conduct a SURVEY, Do an ANALYSIS and then Make a PLAN

Most of these plans were prepared with foreign assistance. Besides, a large number of what may be termed as
mini master plans have also been prepared under the name of Outline Development Plan (ODP) using local
technical and financial resources. For instance, in case of Punjab province, the defunct Housing and Physical
Planning Department (Recently reorganized as Punjab Housing and Town Planning Agency (PHATA) at the
provincial level) has prepared around 125 ODPs for various towns of the Punjab. Similarly, the Project
Management Unit (PMU) of Housing and Physical Planning Department undertook `Feasibility Studies and
HAND OUT 5
Urban Master Planning of Ten Cities of Punjab Project during 1993-94 through a consortium of foreign and
local consultants under World Bank funded Third Urban Development Project.[7] More recently, a new
master plan for Lahore titled Integrated Master Plan for Lahore 2021 (IMPL) has been approved.
Whatever the institutional set up and plan preparation approach have been, the dilemma is that all these types
of plans could not be and still are not being fully implemented.[8] Hence, billions of rupees, time and human
resources are wasted on this master plan making exercises in the country. And there seems to be no end to it.
For instance, various sections of the Provincial Local Government Ordinances promulgated in 2001 provide
for preparation of master plans for areas under every Tehsil/Town Municipal Administration (TMA) in all the
provinces. This is encouraging and does point towards intention of the Government to manage and guide the
growth of urban and rural settlements in a planned manner. But lack of implementation of the earlier plans
really poses a challenge for all the stakeholders particularly for the concerned government agencies and the
professionals involved in the plan making process to avoid failures of implementation with the new plans. A
thorough investigation aimed at determining the root causes of implementation failure and pre-conditions for
the successful implementation of master plans is need of the hour and can be helpful for improving master
planning in Pakistan in the years to come.
References:
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modernity
[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modernism
Gates, Henry Louis 2004. The Norton Anthology of African American Literature. W.W. Norton & Company, Inc.
[3] For details please log on to the website:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urban_planning
[4] Rizwan Hameed and Obaidullah Nadeem (2006) Challenges of Implementing Urban Master Plans: The Lahore Experience Published in
PROCEEDINGS OF WORLD ACADEMY OF SCIENCE, ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY VOLUME 17 DECEMBER 2006 ISSN 13076884 PWASET VOLUME 17 DECEMBER 2006 ISSN 1307-6884 336 2006www.waset.org From: http://www.waset.org/pwaset/v17/v17-65.pdf
[5] M. I. Mirza, A Review of the Master Plan for Karachi Metropolitan Region, in Proc. National Seminar on Planning for Urban Development in the
Developing Countries with Special Reference to Pakistan, Lahore, 1978
[6] B. Philip, The Worlds of Patrick Geddes: Biologist, Town Planner, Re-educator, Peace-warrior, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd. 1978
[7] HP & EPD., Feasibility Studies and Urban Master Planning of Ten Cities of Punjab, Lahore, Housing and Physical Planning Department,
Government of the Punjab, 1994
[8] W. A. Butt, An Evaluation of Outline Development Plan with Special Reference to Gujranwala Division, M.Sc. Thesis, Dept. of City & Regional
Planning, University of Engineering & Technology, Lahore, Pakistan, 1991

Modern Planning in Pakistan and Abroad

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Modern Planning in Pakistan and Abroad

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Architecture & Town Planning (CE - 4702)