Professional Documents
Culture Documents
I. INTRODUCTION
Concentration
(Wt Pct)
None
Stearic acid
Methanol
Milling Duration
(h)
2 to 16
2 to 64
2 to 34
whereas the iron powder was manufactured via a vaporphase chemical decomposition process, the chromium powder via electrolytic plating and milling, and the titanium
powder via the hydride technique followed by a dehydride
process. The MA was performed in a Spex 8000 (SPEX
CertiPrep, Inc., Metuchen, NJ) laboratory mill using a stainless steel vial and balls, with a ball-to-powder weight ratio
of 5:1. Two different sizes of steel balls (1.0 and 0.5 cm
in diameter) were used simultaneously to provide uniform
milling for different sizes of powder particles. The vial
loaded with powders of the desired average composition
was sealed in a glove box under an argon atmosphere, and
milling was conducted in the stationary argon atmosphere.
Two types of PCAs, stearic acid (CH3(CH2)16COOH) and
methanol (CH3OH), were investigated. A summary of various milling conditions that were studied is presented in Table
I. The alloy without a PCA was also investigated, to provide
a baseline for comparison. The milling duration ranged from
2 to 64 hours, depending on the milling conditions used. A
fan was used to cool the vial during milling, and at the end
of each milling process, all the powder was taken out for
analyses of microstructures and powder characteristics. For
the alloys without the addition of a PCA, both large (1 to
5 mm) and small (0.2 to 0.5 mm) Al alloy particles were
generated. However, only the results of small particles were
used to compare with those obtained from the alloys with
the addition of a PCA.
Powders before and after milling were analyzed using Xray diffraction (XRD) methods with Cu K radiation. In
addition to monitoring the evolution of the crystal structure,
XRD was also used to measure the crystallite size and internal strains. This was accomplished through the use of the
Win-Crysize software,[29] which is based on the Warren
Averbach theory[30] and includes the consideration of instrumental broadening. The specific surface area (SSA) of
powder particles was quantified using nitrogen adsorption
based on the BraunauerEmmettTeller theory.[31] The particle morphology, microstructures, and distribution of elements within the particle were examined using a scanning
electron microscope (SEM) equipped with energy-dispersive
spectrometry (EDS). Analyses of the grain size, crystal structure, and chemical composition within the microstructure
were also performed using a PHILIPS* CM200 field-emis*PHILIPS is a trademark of Philips Electronic Instruments Corp., Mahwah, NJ.
Fig. 2The radii of equivalent spherical particles computed from the SSA
data of the Al alloys with 1 and 2 wt pct stearic acid.
III. RESULTS
Shown in Figure 1 is the SSA of Al alloy powders with
1 wt pct stearic acid as a function of milling time. It can be
seen that the SSA decreases substantially during the initial
four hours of milling, indicating an increase in particle size
due to cold welding. After 4 hours of milling, however, the
SSA increases rapidly and appears to approach a dynamic
balance between cold welding and fracturing beyond 16
hours of milling. Assuming that the powder particles formed
during milling are spheres, the radii of these equivalent
spherical particles can be calculated from the SSA and are
presented in Figure 2. Included in the figure are also the
radii of equivalent spherical particles computed from the
SSA data of the Al alloy powder with 2 wt pct stearic acid.
As seen in the figure, the particle size varies substantially
for the alloy powder with 1 wt pct stearic acid. In contrast,
the particle size of the alloy powder with 2 wt pct stearic
acid is insensitive to the milling time, indicating that 2 wt
pct stearic acid could prevent excessive cold welding even
at the early stage of milling.
The SEM images of powder morphology for several MAprocessed powders are shown in Figures 3(a) through (d),
which correspond to the data points a through d marked
in Figure 2. Note that most of the powder particles with 4
METALLURGICAL AND MATERIALS TRANSACTIONS A
Fig. 3SEM images of the Al alloy milled with 1 wt pct stearic acid for (a) 4 h, (b) 8 h, (c) 16 h, and (d ) 64 h.
Fig. 4XRD patterns of the Al alloy with 1 wt pct stearic acid (SA) as
a function of milling time. For comparison, the XRD pattern of the starting
Al alloy powder (0 wt pct SA, 0 h) is also included.
some of their peaks overlap with Al peaks. Thus, the detection of the formation of Al-Fe-Cr-Ti alloys and other structural information could only rely on the measurement of
VOLUME 34A, JANUARY 2003161
Fig. 5XRD patterns of the Al alloys milled for 16 h but with different
amounts of PCA. Key: SAstearic acid; and MLmethanol.
Fig. 7The atomic level strain of fcc-Al in the Al alloy powder mixtures
without and with 1 wt pct stearic acid as a function of milling time.
Fig. 6Calculated crystallite sizes of fcc-Al in the Al alloy powder mixtures with and without stearic acid as a function of milling time.
Fig. 8The lattice parameter of fcc-Al in the Al alloy powder mixtures
without and with 1 wt pct stearic acid as a function of milling time.
Fig. 11SEM backscatter electron images of the microstructure of Al alloys with 1 wt pct stearic acid milled for (a) 2 h, (b) 8 h, (c) 16 h, and (d ) 64 h.
The letters in the micrographs indicate the major composition of that particular location detected using EDS. The text provides more details.
Table II. The Size of Most of the Cr-, Ti-, and Fe-Rich
Particles within the Al Matrix
Milling Time
(h)
Size of Cr
Particles (m)
Size of Ti
Particles (m)
Size of Fe
Particles (m)
8
16
64
10
4
0.55
4
3
0.25*
1
0.25*
0.25*
the alloy with 1 wt pct stearic acid has the lowest number.
Since the formation of solid solutions requires dissolution
of fine particles, these results suggest that the higher the
PCA concentration, the smaller the formation rate of solid
solutions. Furthermore, 1 wt pct methanol decreases the
solid-solution formation rate more than 1 wt pct stearic acid.
This result is in accordance with the effect of stearic acid
and methanol on the reduction in the lattice parameter and
crystallite size of fcc-Al (Figures 9 and 10).
To confirm the formation of nanosized grains and Albased solid solutions, TEM analyses coupled with SAD,
CBED, and EDS have been performed on Al alloys milled
for 16 hours without a PCA. The results are shown in Figures
164VOLUME 34A, JANUARY 2003
13 and 14. Figure 13(a) and (b) show the typical morphology
of nanosized Al grains and the associated SAD pattern,
which corresponds to fcc Al, respectively. Most of the grains
are elongated, reflecting the severe plastic deformation
which occurred during MA. The grain size ranges from
10 to 100 nm, depending on the location. The comparison
between the XRD and TEM analyses indicates that the grain
size estimated by XRD is at the lower end of the TEM
result. Figures 13(c) and (d) present a large polycrystalline
Cr particle embedded in the Al matrix and its associated
SAD pattern, respectively. The size of this elongated Cr
particle is 0.5 1.5 m. In general, Cr particles are relatively
large and easy to find in the TEM analysis. However, both
Ti and Fe particles are difficult to find. Shown in Figures
13(e) and (f) are an Fe particle embedded in the Al matrix
and its associated CBED pattern, respectively. The size of
this particle is 50 120 nm. Thus, the findings using the
TEM are consistent with those obtained from the SEM, that
is, Cr-rich particles are the largest in size and Fe-rich particles are the smallest. Using EDS, it is further found that all
the Cr, Fe, and Ti particles contain some Al elements (to be
discussed more in the following text).
The EDS analysis of TEM thin foils indicates that the
composition of the Al powder particle is nonuniform. The
nonuniformity manifests itself in two ways. One is the presMETALLURGICAL AND MATERIALS TRANSACTIONS A
IV. DISCUSSION
Fig. 13TEM bright-field images and the associated diffraction patterns of Al alloys milled for 16 h with no PCA. (a) The bright-field image of typical
Al nanograins, (b) the associated SAD pattern of image (a), (c) one large polycrystalline Cr-rich particle embedded in the Al matrix, (d ) the associated
SAD pattern from the Cr-rich particle in image (c), (e) one small Fe-rich particle embedded in the Al matrix, ( f ) the associated CBED pattern from the
Fe-rich particle in image (e) with the zone axis of [111].
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
Fig. 14EDS spectra from TEM analyses. (a) An EDS spectrum taken from an elongated Al grain, (b) an EDS spectrum taken from another elongated
Al grain at a different location, (c) an EDS spectrum taken from an elongated Al grain at the location different from (a) and (b), (d ) the EDS spectrum
taken from the center of the Cr-rich particle shown in Fig. 13(c), and (e) the EDS spectrum acquired from the center of the Fe-rich particle shown in Fig. 13(e).
Fig. 15Schematic of one of the possible adsorption models for (a) methanol and (b) stearic acid on the Al alloy surface. It is assumed that hydrogen
elements have been dissociated from the -OH and -COOH groups in methanol and stearic acid, respectively, in the adsorption process, because the
chemical analysis of the gas phase during ball milling indicates that the
gas phase is mainly composed of hydrogen for these two types of PCA.[27]
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The first author (LS) is grateful to the University of Connecticut for granting a sabbatical leave to conduct research
at the Air Force Research Laboratory. The second author
(MZ) thanks the Academy of Scientific Research and Technology, Egypt for providing a fellowship for him to conduct
this research at the University of Connecticut. The partial
support from the Laboratory Directors Fund of the Air Force
Research Laboratory and the University of Connecticut
METALLURGICAL AND MATERIALS TRANSACTIONS A
REFERENCES
1. Y. He, S.J. Poon, and G.J. Shiflet: Science, 1988, vol. 241, pp. 1640-42.
2. A. Inoue, K. Ohtera, A.-P. Tsai, and T. Masumoto: Jpn. J. Appl. Phys.,
1988, vol. 27 (3), pp. L280-L282.
3. A. Inoue, K. Ohtera, and T. Masumoto: Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 1988,
vol. 27 (5), pp. L736-L739.
4. G.J. Shiflet, Y. He, and S.J. Poon: J. Appl. Phys., 1988, vol. 64 (12),
pp. 6863-65.
5. A. Inoue and H. Kimura: Mater. Sci. Eng., 2000, vol. A286 (1), pp.
1-10.
6. A. Inoue and T. Masumoto: Mater. Sci. Eng., 1991, vol. A133, pp. 6-9.
7. H. Chen, Y. He, G. Shiflet, and S.J. Poon: Scripta Metall. Mater.,
1991, vol. 25, pp. 1421-24.
8. A. Inoue: Mater. Sci. Eng., 1994, vols. A179A180, pp. 57-61.
9. Z.C. Zhong, X.Y. Jiang, and A.L. Greer: Mater. Sci. Eng., 1997, vols.
A226A228, pp. 531-35.
10. J.Q. Guo and K. Ohtera: Acta Mater., 1998, vol. 46 (11), pp. 3829-38.
11. A. Inoue: Mater. Sci. Forum, 1997, vols. 235238, pp. 873-80.
12. A. Inoue, H.M. Kimura, K. Sasamori, and T. Masumoto: Mater. Trans.,
JIM, 1995, vol. 36 (1), pp. 6-15.
13. A. Inoue, H. Kimura, K. Sasamori, and T. Masumoto: Mater. Trans.,
JIM, 1996, vol. 37 (6), pp. 1287-92.
14. D.L. Erich: Development of A Mechanically Alloyed Aluminum
Alloy for 450650 F Service, AFML-TR-79-4210, US Dept. of
Commerce, National Technical Information Service (NTIS), Springfield, VA, 1980.
15. M. Zawrah and L. Shaw: Mater. Sci. Eng., 2002, in press.
16. J.S. Benjamin and M.J. Bomford: Metall. Trans. A, 1977, vol. 8A,
pp. 1301-05.
17. R.F. Singer, W.C. Oliver, and W.D. Nix: Metall. Trans. A, 1980, vol.
11A, pp. 1895-1901.
18. P.S. Gilman and W.D. Nix: Metall. Trans. A, 1981, vol. 12A, pp.
813-24.
19. J. Eckert, J.C. Holzer, C.E. Krill, and W.L. Johnson: J. Mater. Res.,
1992, vol. 7 (7), pp. 1751-61.
20. S. Srinivasan, S.R. Chen, and R.B. Schwarz: Mater. Sci. Eng., 1992,
vol. A153, pp. 691-95.
21. S. Srinivasan, P.B. Desch, and R.B. Schwarz: Scripta Metall. Mater.,
1991, vol. 25, pp. 2513-16.
22. Z. Peng, C. Suryanarayana, and F.H. Froes: Scripta Metall. Mater.,
1992, vol. 27, pp. 475-80.
23. W.E. Frazier and M.J. Koczak: Scripta Metall., 1987, vol. 21, pp.
129-34.
24. L. Lu and M.O. Lai: Mechanical Alloying, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA, 1998.
25. S. Enzo, R. Frattini, G. Mulas, and F. Delogu: Mater. Sci. Forum,
1998, vols. 269272, pp. 391-96.
26. A.P. Radlinski, A. Calka, B.W. Ninham, and W.A. Kaczmarek: Mater.
Sci. Eng., 1991, vol. A134, pp. 1346-49.
27. A. Arias: Chemical Reactions of Metal Powders with Organic and
Inorganic Liquids during Ball Milling, NASA TN D-8015, US
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Technical
Information Service (NTIS), Springfield, VA, 1975.
28. A.M. Harris, G.B. Schaffer, and N.W. Page: in Mechanical Alloying for
Structural Applications, J.J. deBarbadillo, F.H. Froes, and R. Schwarz,
eds., ASM INTERNATIONAL, Materials Park, OH, 1993, pp. 15-19.
29. WIN-CRYSIZE software, version 3.05, Sigma-C Corp., Munich,
Germany.
30. B.E. Warren: Progress in Metal Physics, Pergamon Press, London,
1957, vol. 8.
31. S. Brunauer, P.H. Emmett, and E. Teller: J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1938,
vol. 60, p. 309.
32. P. Haasen: Physical Metallurgy, 3rd Ed., Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge, Great Britain, 1996, p. 142.
33. J.S. Benjamin and T.E. Volin: Metall. Trans., 1974, vol. 5, pp. 1929-34.
34. H.J. Fecht, E. Hellstern, Z. Fu, and W.L. Johnson: Metall. Trans. A,
1990, vol. 21A, pp. 2333-37.
35. H.J. McQueen and J.J. Jonas: in Treatise on Materials Science and
VOLUME 34A, JANUARY 2003169
38. R.M. Davis, B. McDermott, and C.C. Koch: Metall. Trans. A, 1988,
vol. 19A, pp. 2867-74.
39. R.B. Schwarz and C.C. Koch: Appl. Phys. Lett., 1986, vol. 49 (3),
pp. 146-48.
40. Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, D.R. Lide, ed., CRC Press, Boca
Raton, FL, 1990.