Pro

Project: Feasibility cum PDR for 4/6-laning of Ambala to Kaithal section of NH-65

Fina Final Feasibility cum Preliminary Design Report: Chapter-10

CHAPTER 10: CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

10.1

Background
National Highways Authority of India (NHAI), Government of India has decided to take up the development of various
NH Corridors where the intensity of traffic has increased significantly and there is requirement of augmentation of
capacity. NHAI has decided to implement some of the development project for these corridors through Public Private
Partnership (PPP) venture in a Design-Build-Finance-Operate format. For the purpose of project preparation the length
of various corridors has been divided into convenient sections, selected on the basis of traffic generation and attraction
potential, geographic location and other considerations. The above section is to be developed as a partially access
controlled toll highway. Bypasses wherever provided shall be fully access controlled. NHAI has assigned the
consultancy services for carrying out Feasibility cum Preliminary Design Report to M/s MEINHARDT SINGAPORE
PTE LIMITED, NOIDA.
The main objective of the Consultancy services is to establish the technical, economical and financial viability of the
project and prepare feasibility cum preliminary design reports for developing the existing 2-lane NH section to 4/6-lane
divided carriageway configuration. The highway section is to be developed as partially access controlled facility with
provision of service roads, bypasses, intersections, underpasses/flyovers/ROBs etc. as appropriate. The report will
include preliminary highway design, design of pavement and overlay, preliminary design of bridges and CD structures
and grade separated structures, design of service road, preliminary cost estimate etc.
The feasibility cum preliminary design report will also take into account economic and financial viability analyses,
environmental and social feasibility and action plan as appropriate. The consultant will also ensure enhanced safety of
traffic, road users and enhanced operational efficiency of the highway.

10.2

Project Development
The existing project road has capacity limitation and the traffic warrants improvements. These include the widening of
roads and structures, provision of bypass in congested locations, construction of new major bridge, minor bridges,
Flyover and underpasses.

10.2.1

Road Work
Widening of the project road to 4/6 lanes with the provision of median and shoulders, both as concentric and eccentric
widening, provision of service road in selected congested stretches as under:
For application to different situations, 8nos. of typical cross-sections have been designed for adoption in various
stretches and are listed in the following Table. It also indicates the situations for which these cross-sections are
applicable.

Type I

4-lane divided carriageway without service road (eccentric widening on left) [Fig 6.1]

Type II

4-lane divided carriageway without service road (eccentric widening on right) [Fig 6.2]

Type III

4-lane divided carriageway with service road (eccentric widening on left) [Fig 6.3]

Type IV

4-lane divided carriageway without service road on new alignment (bypass) [Fig. 6.4]

Type V

4-lane divided carriageway at raising location in Existing alignment [Fig 6.5]

Type VI

4-lane divided carriageway at Flyover/Underpass location (with service road) in new

alignment [Fig 6.6]

Type VII

4-lane divided carriageway at Flyover/Underpass location (with service road) in existing

alignment [Fig 6.7]

Document : 1058/RH/REP/FFR/403_1_R1

1 of 11

Pro

Project: Feasibility cum PDR for 4/6-laning of Ambala to Kaithal section of NH-65

Fina Final Feasibility cum Preliminary Design Report: Chapter-10

Chainage (Km)

10.2.2

The

Length
(Km)

Type

Median
Width

ROW

0.300
1.250
2.050
2.450
9.833
1.427

IV
VI
IV
VI
IV
I

4.5
2.0
4.5
2.0
4.5
4.5

60
60
60
60
60
60

18.960

1.650

IV

4.5

60

18.960
22.580
23.320
24.260
26.960

22.580
23.320
24.260
26.960
27.860

3.620
0.740
0.940
2.700
0.900

II
VII
I
IV
II

4.5
2.0
4.5
4.5
4.5

60
60
60
60
60

27.860
28.160
28.560
29.160
34.660

28.160
28.560
29.160
34.660
34.800

0.300

4.5

60

0.400
0.600
5.500
0.140

III
II
V
IV

2.0
4.5
4.5
4.5

60
60
60
60

34.800
35.560

35.560
36.960

0.760

VI

2.0

60

1.400

IV

4.5

60

36.960
37.720
39.460

37.720
39.460
42.360

0.760

VI

2.0

60

1.740
2.900

IV
II

4.5
4.5

60
60

42.360
42.760
43.960
44.160
50.420
50.860

42.760
43.960
44.160
50.420
50.860
55.360

0.400

IV

4.5

60

Geometric
Improvement

1.200
0.200
6.260
0.440
4.500

III
I
V
II
IV

2.0
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5

60
60
60
60
60

Raising

55.360
56.120

56.120
58.040

0.760

VI

2.0

60

1.920

IV

4.5

60

Sl
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6

From
0.000
0.300
1.550
3.600
6.050
15.883

To
0.300
1.550
3.600
6.050
15.883
17.310

17.310

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31

Remarks

(m)
Ambala Bypass
ROB Approaches
Ambala Bypass
Flyover Approaches
Ambala Bypass

Pavement
design

Matheri Shekhan
Bypass
VUP
Realignment
Geometric
Improvement

Raising
Ismailabad Bypass
VUP in Ismailabad
Bypass
Ismailabad Bypass
VUP in Ismailabad
Bypass
Ismailabad Bypass

Pehowa Bypass
Flyover in Pehowa
Bypass
Pehowa Bypass
Flyover in Pehowa
Bypass
Pehowa Bypass

0.800
VI
2.0
60
58.040
58.840
32
0.720
IV
4.5
60
58.840
59.560
33
0.600
I
4.5
60
59.560
60.160
34
7.650
II
4.5
60
60.160
67.810
35
3.100
I
4.5
60
67.810
70.910
36
3.100
II
4.5
60
70.910
74.010
37
0.750
VII
2.0
60
VUP
74.010
74.760
38
0.550
I
4.5
60
74.760
75.310
39
1.350
II
4.5
60
75.310
76.660
40
0.300
I
4.5
60
76.660
76.960
41
18.423
IV
4.5
60
Kaithal Bypass
76.960
95.383
recommended overlay designs for general application for the different sections are also indicated in Table below.
Document : 1058/RH/REP/FFR/403_1_R1

2 of 11

Pro

Project: Feasibility cum PDR for 4/6-laning of Ambala to Kaithal section of NH-65

Fina Final Feasibility cum Preliminary Design Report: Chapter-10

Comparison of Overlay Designs by Different Methods

Chainage of
Homogeneous
Section
5.0 18.0
18.0 27.0
27.0 44.0
44.0 51.0
51.0 67.0
67.0 72.8

Thickness of BC+DBM

Recommended Design

By IRC:81

By Reverse CBR Method

BM

DBM

BC

140
120
150
120
150
120

125
155
120
150
165
210

50
50
50
-

50
50
50
50
50
50

40
40
40
40
40
40

Design of new flexible pavement applies to the new carriageway and widening of existing carriageway including paved
shoulders. The methodologies recommended in IRC: 37-2001 and AASHTO Design Guide (1993) have been adopted
and the final designs recommended are based on best engineering judgment.
Comparison of Design Thickness between IRC and AASHTO Procedures
Layer
BC
DBM
WMM
GSB
Total Thickness
SN

10.2.3

AASHTO
40
130
250
370
820
5.82

IRC
40
100
250
330
750
5.23

Recommended
40
100
250
330
750
5.23

Material
The material report has been prepared based on the field investigation carried out for:

Sources of borrow area soil and the laboratory tests on quality of the material and suitability as
embankment and sub-grade material
Sources of quarries and laboratory test results, quantity and suitability as pavement materials

Existing sub-soil evaluation results

Suitable borrow areas for construction of embankment and subgrade material have been identified. PWD approved
quarries at Kala Amba near Himachal Border are suitable both for pavement and concrete works. The yield of these
quarries is sufficient for the project works.

10.2.4

Bridges and Structures

The list of Bridges, Flyover, ROBs, Underpass and culverts their location and proposed span arrangement and
treatment is out lined in the tabular form on the subsequent pages:

Widening/Repair of Existing Major Bridges

Document : 1058/RH/REP/FFR/403_1_R1

3 of 11

Pro

Project: Feasibility cum PDR for 4/6-laning of Ambala to Kaithal section of NH-65

Fina Final Feasibility cum Preliminary Design Report: Chapter-10

Sl.
No.
1

Existing
Type of
Overall
Span
Bridge No.
Overall Width
Proposed Arrangem
Existing
Width
After
Superstruct
Chainage
ent
Substructure Foundation
Location
(M)
Widenin
ure
(C/C Exp.
g (M)
Gap) (M)
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
20+900

(Dangri
Bridge)
38+327
(Markanda
Bridge)

25+288

1x 30.3 +
4 X 35.8

RCC- T
beam

RCC, Circular RCC, Well

9.0

9.0

42+208

6x30.35

RCC- T
beam

RCC, wall type RCC, Well

8.5

8.5

Remarks

9
On Right c/w,
No widening
proposed as the
super-structure is
of T-beam type
On Left c/w,
No widening
proposed as the
super-structure is
of T-beam type

Widening/Repair of Existing Minor Bridges

Existing
Span
Arrangeme
Superstruct
nt
ure
(C/C Exp.
Gap) (M)
3
4

Type Of

Sl.
No.

Bridge No.
Existing
Location

35+577

39+513

3x4.50

RCC Solid
slab

Brick Masonry,
Wall type

35+860

39+798

3x4.50

RCC Solid
slab

Brick Masonry,
Wall type

36+128

40+058

3x4.50

RCC Solid
slab

Brick Masonry,
Wall type

36+310

40+238

3x4.50

RCC Solid
slab

Brick Masonry,
Wall type

36+580

40+508

3x4.50

RCC Solid
slab

Brick Masonry,
Wall type

36+920

40+848

3x4.50

RCC Solid
slab

Brick Masonry,
Wall type

37+137

41+058

3x4.50

RCC Solid
slab

Brick Masonry,
Wall type

40+880

44+788

3x8.40

RCC Solid
slab

Brick Masonry,
Wall type

58+320

62+988

2x9.5

RCC Solid
slab

Brick Masonry,
Wall type

10

71+290

75+928

2x13

RCC box
structure

RCC Wall type

Proposed
Chainage

Substructure
5

Overall
Overall Width
After
Foundati Width
(M)
Widening
on
(M)
6
Brick
Masonry,
Open
Brick
Masonry,
Open
Brick
Masonry,
Open
Brick
Masonry,
Open
Brick
Masonry,
Open
Brick
Masonry,
Open
Brick
Masonry,
Open
Brick
Masonry,
Open
Brick
Masonry,
Open
RCC raft

8.5

12.5

Remarks

12.5
8.5
12.5
8.5
12.5
8.5
12.5
8.5
12.5
8.5
12.5
8.5
12.5
7.2
12.5
7.4
19.5

19.5

On left c/w,
No action
proposed

Details of Proposed New Major Bridge

Document : 1058/RH/REP/FFR/403_1_R1

4 of 11

Pro

Project: Feasibility cum PDR for 4/6-laning of Ambala to Kaithal section of NH-65

Fina Final Feasibility cum Preliminary Design Report: Chapter-10

Sl. No.

Span
Type Of
Overall
Proposed Arrangement
Width
Chainage (C/C Exp. Gap) Superstructure Substructure Foundation
(M)
(M)

25+288

1x 30.3 + 4 X
35.8

25+728

5x24.0 + 3
x20.0

PSC T-beam

RCC wall type

42+208

6x30.35

RCC- T beam

RCC, wall type RCC, Well

54+059

3 x20.9

PSC T-Beam

RCC Wall type

RCC- T beam

RCC, Circular

RCC Pile

RCC Pile

RCC Pile

Remarks
New Dangari river
bridge on Left
carriageway

12.5

Bridge over Satlij

Yamuna Branch Canal
2 x12.5
& Narayana Branch
Canal in realignment
12.5

New Markanda bridge

on Right carriageway

2 x12.5

In Pehowa Bypass

Details of Proposed New Minor Bridge

Span
Type Of
Arrangeme
Sl. Proposed
Overall
nt
Superstruct
No. Chainage
Width (M)
Substructure
Foundation
(C/C Exp.
ure
Gap) (M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
RCC Solid
Open
1
RCC wall Type
2 x 12.5
1x15
slab
Foundation
4157
2
3
4

4740
6745
7159

Remarks
8
In Ambala Bypass

1x10

RCC Solid
slab

RCC wall Type

2 x 12.5
Open
Foundation

In Ambala Bypass

1x15

RCC Solid
slab

RCC wall Type

2 x 12.5
Open
Foundation

In Ambala Bypass

1x15

RCC Solid
slab

RCC wall Type

2 x 12.5
Open
Foundation

In Ambala Bypass

2 x 12.5
RCC solid
Open
RCC wall Type
slab
Foundation

24808

2 x 6.55 +1
x 7.1

36288

3x13.5

RCC TBeam

RCC Wall type

38658

2x6.5

RCC Box

RCC wall type

Raft

39008

2x6.5

RCC Box

RCC wall type

Raft

39208

1x13.5

RCC TBeam

RCC Wall type

2 x 12.5
Open
Foundation

In Ismailabad Bypass

10

39513

1x13.5

RCC TBeam

RCC Wall type

Open
Foundation

1 x 12.5

On right carriageway

11

39798

1x13.5

RCC TBeam

RCC Wall type

Open
Foundation

1 x 12.5

On right carriageway

Document : 1058/RH/REP/FFR/403_1_R1

2 x 12.5
Open
Foundation
2 x 12.5
2 x 12.5

On realignment portion
In Ismailabad Bypass
In Ismailabad Bypass
In Ismailabad Bypass

5 of 11

Pro

Project: Feasibility cum PDR for 4/6-laning of Ambala to Kaithal section of NH-65

Fina Final Feasibility cum Preliminary Design Report: Chapter-10

Span
Type Of
Sl. Proposed Arrangeme
Overall
Superstruct
No. Chainage
Substructure Foundation Width (M)
nt
ure
(C/C3Exp.
1
2
4
5
6
7

Remarks
8

12

40058

1x13.5

RCC TBeam

RCC Wall type

Open
Foundation

1 x 12.5

On right carriageway

13

40238

1x13.5

RCC TBeam

RCC Wall type

Open
Foundation

1 x 12.5

On right carriageway

14

40508

1x13.5

RCC TBeam

RCC Wall type

Open
Foundation

1 x 12.5

On right carriageway

15

40848

1x13.5

RCC TBeam

RCC Wall type

Open
Foundation

1 x 12.5

On right carriageway

16

41058

1x13.5

RCC TBeam

RCC Wall type

Open
Foundation

1 x 12.5

On right carriageway

17

44788

3x8.40

RCC Solid
Open
RCC Wall type
slab
Foundation

1 x 12.5

On left carriageway

18

54758

2x12.5

RCC Solid
Open
RCC wall Type
slab
Foundation

2 x 12.5

In Pehowa Bypass

19

62988

2x9.5

RCC Solid
Open
RCC wall Type
slab
Foundation

1 x 12.5

On right carriageway

20

75928

2x13

1 x 12.5

On right carriageway

21

77508

1x11.0

RCC Solid
Open
RCC wall Type
slab
Foundation

2 x 12.5

In Kaithal Bypass

22

79118

1x6.0

RCC Solid
Open
RCC wall Type
slab
Foundation

2 x 12.5

In Kaithal Bypass on Kaithal

Major Distributory

23

84084

1x8.0

RCC Solid
Open
RCC wall Type
slab
Foundation

2 x 12.5

In Kaithal Bypass on Shergarh

Minor (Kaithal branch)

24

86897

2x10.0

RCC Solid
Open
RCC wall Type
slab
Foundation

2 x 12.5

In Kaithal Bypass on Amin

Drain

25

87812

1x7.0

RCC Solid
Open
RCC wall Type
slab
Foundation

2 x 12.5

In Kaithal Bypass on Sirsa

Branch

26

87866

1x25.0

2 x 12.5

In Kaithal Bypass on Sirsa

Branch

RCC box
structure

RCC TBeam

RCC Wall type

RCC Wall type

RCC raft

Open
Foundation

Design of Underpass, Flyover & ROB

Three Flyovers & Six underpasses have been proposed. Flyovers are proposed at NH-1, SH-6 & SH-9 crossings on
Pehowa Bypass and Underpasses are proposed at bituminous road crossings on all bypasses & at some selected
road junctions on existing highway.
A minimum vertical clearance of 5.5m has been provided. Flyovers are proposed with PSC-T-Beam & slab type
structure for a width of 12 m for each carriageway with clear median opening in between. Underpass are proposed
with RCC box type structure for a width of 12 m for each carriageway with clear median opening in between

Proposed New Underpasses:

The details of proposed underpasses are as given in Tables below.

Document : 1058/RH/REP/FFR/403_1_R1

6 of 11

Pro

Project: Feasibility cum PDR for 4/6-laning of Ambala to Kaithal section of NH-65

Fina Final Feasibility cum Preliminary Design Report: Chapter-10

Proposed Underpass

Design Chainage
Proposed Structural
Name of Intersecting Roads
(Km)
Type

0+750

1
2

4+600

22+938

35+185

37+393

74+398

Sudpur Village
Nizampur to Ambala
Road
Nagal village road
crossing close to
School/ Hospital
Sabad village road
crossing
Across Ismailabad
Bypass
On Patiyala road
crossing

Proposed Span
Arrangement

Total Width
of
Clear Height (m)
Structure
(m)

RCC Box

1 x 10.5m

2 x 12.5 m

5.5m

RCC Box

1 x 10.5m

2 x 12.5 m

5.5m

RCC Box

1 x 10.5m

2 x 12.5 m

5.5m

RCC Box

1 x 10.5m

2 x 12.5 m

5.5m

RCC Box

1 x 10.5m

2 x 12.5 m

5.5m

RCC Box

1 x 10.5m

2 x 12.5 m

5.5m

Proposed New Fly Over:

The details of proposed flyover are as given in Tables below.
Proposed Fly over
Design
Sl. No.Chainage (Km)
1
2
3

Name of
Intersecting Roads

4+248

On Ambala Bypass

55+718
58+458

Span
arrangement
(m
1x58

Length (m)

1 x 25

25

1 x 25

25

SH6 in Pehowa
Bypass
SH9 in Pehowa
Bypass

58

Over all
width (m)
2 x 12.5 m
2 x 12.5 m
2 x 12.5 m

Remarks
4 Lane
4 Lane
4 Lane

Proposed New ROB:

The details of proposed ROB are as given in Tables below.
Proposed ROB
S No.

Location

On Ambala Bypass

Design
Chainage

Proposed span
arrangement (m)

Proposed
Structure
type

Total width
of the
structure (m)

1x30

PSC Girder &

Slab

2 x 12.5 m

1x30

PSC Girder &

Slab

2 x 12.5 m

1x30

PSC Girder &

Slab

2 x 12.5 m

0+849
2

On Ambala Bypass

5+164
3

On Kaithal Bypass

80+986

Summary of Proposed Culverts

Document : 1058/RH/REP/FFR/403_1_R1

7 of 11

Pro

Project: Feasibility cum PDR for 4/6-laning of Ambala to Kaithal section of NH-65

Fina Final Feasibility cum Preliminary Design Report: Chapter-10

Type of Culvert
Culverts to be widened
Pipe Type
Slab type
Culverts to be Replaced / New construction
New Single Pipe
New Single box
New Slab
Total

Document : 1058/RH/REP/FFR/403_1_R1

Nos.
1
20
62
45
12
140

8 of 11

Pro

Project: Feasibility cum PDR for 4/6-laning of Ambala to Kaithal section of NH-65

Fina Final Feasibility cum Preliminary Design Report: Chapter-10

10.2.5

Miscellaneous Facilities
Toll Plazas
The project road is proposed to be developed as Tolled Road. The project road being only 95.383km long, only two toll
plaza will be feasible to be provided. During site reconnaissance it was observed that free space is available near km
24+000 & km 64+000 suitable for development of Toll Plaza System. Same is already discussed with NHAI officials
during site visit.
Rest Area
Highway users who travel long distances upto a few hundred kilometers a day during a single journey need amenities
along the highway. This section of project road has several eating places at the built-up areas. Moreover, this section
connects directly Kaithal headquarters of Kaithal District with Ambala. Thus amenities are available at these two
locations separated by only 72.74 km. Further provision of a Rest Area will require additional acquisition of land along
with provision of infrastructures in it. Keeping this in view no additional Rest Area is contemplated and thus not
provided in this section. However, this requires concurrence of NHAI

Bus-bays
21 nos. Bus Bays with Passenger Shelters on each side of the road along the project highway have been proposed.

S. No.

Design Chainage (Km)

Location

0.000

NH22 Junction with Ambala Bypass

1+800

Dadiana

5+900

Nizampur

8+700

Jameetgarh

10+000

Losimbly

15.883

NH65 Junction with Ambala By[ass

17.285

Matheri Shekhan

22.110

Naggal

27.660

End of Re-alignment

10

33.310

Babukpur village

11

41.300

Jawera village

12

43.360

S.M.Polytechnic

13

50.760

Start of Pehowa Bypass

14

55.460

SH-6

15

58.460

SH-9

16

60.360

End of Pehowa Bypass

17

74.510

Brought Dhand

18

76.560

Start of Kaithal Bypass

19

80.160

MDR-119

20

85.660

SH-8

21

94.860

End of Kaithal Bypass

Document : 1058/RH/REP/FFR/403_1_R1

9 of 11

Pro

Project: Feasibility cum PDR for 4/6-laning of Ambala to Kaithal section of NH-65

Fina Final Feasibility cum Preliminary Design Report: Chapter-10

Truck Lay-byes
During site reconnaissance it was observed that there are several roadside dhabas, where trucks park their vehicle for
eating, resting or even minor maintenance of vehicles. Depending upon the site conditions the locations of truck lay
byes proposed on each side of the roads are as follows:

Location

Chainage (Km) - LHS

Near Thol

31+115

31+535

Near Pehowa

58+885

59+335

Chainage (Km) - RHS

Service Road
The concept of service road is being conceived at built-up area and grade separated intersections (Flyover &
Underpass locations) which will come along the proposed alignment. The typical cross-section under this scenario is
also indicated in Fig. 6.3, Fig 6.6 & Fig 6.7. The list of proposed service road stretches are as follows

0+300 to 1+550
3+600 to 6+050
22+580 to 23+320
28+160 to 28+560
34+800 to 35+560
36+960 to 37+720
42+760 to 43+960
55+360 to 56+120
58+040 to 58+840
74+010 to 74+760

Improvement of Junctions / Intersections

Following major junctions needing improvement have been identified along the project road and shown below.
Details of major Junctions
Sl.
No.

Km

0+000

4+232

4+292

15+883

4 Legged (+ Type)

End of Ambala Bypass

NH-65

30+090

4 Legged (+ Type)

Junction with SH-4

SH-4

Type
3 Legged (T Type)
3 Legged (T Type)
3 Legged (T Type)

Place

Joining road

Start of Ambala Bypass

NH-22

Junction with NH-1 Service

road
Junction with NH-1 Service
road

Ambala
Bypass
Ambala
Bypass

34+660

3 Legged (Y Type)

Start of Ismailabad Bypass

NH-65

39+460

3 Legged (Y Type)

End of Ismailabad Bypass

NH-65

50+860

3 Legged (Y Type)

Start of Pehowa Bypass

NH-65

55+720

4 Legged (+ Type)

In Pehowa Bypass

SH-6

10

58+460

4 Legged (+ Type)

In Pehowa Bypass

SH-9

11

59+560

3 Legged ( Y Type)

End of Pehowa Bypass

NH-65

Document : 1058/RH/REP/FFR/403_1_R1

10 of 11

Pro

Project: Feasibility cum PDR for 4/6-laning of Ambala to Kaithal section of NH-65

Fina Final Feasibility cum Preliminary Design Report: Chapter-10

10.3

Sl.
No.

Km

Type

Place

Joining road

12

76+960

3 Legged ( Y Type)

NH-65

13

80+670

4 Legged (+ Type)

14

85+705

4 Legged (+ Type)

15

95+383

4 Legged (+ Type)

Start of Kaithal Bypass

With MDR-119 in Kaithal
Bypass
With SH-8 in Kaithal Bypass
Titram More (end of Kaithal
Bypass)

MDR-119
SH-8
SH-11 & Kaithal
Bypass

Project Cost
Package-I
Civil Cost = Rs. 483.140 Cr.
Total Project Cost = Rs. 602.958Cr.
Package-II
Civil Cost = Rs. 460.165 Cr.
Total Project Cost = Rs. 574.286Cr.
Total project cost would include the following:
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)

Total cost of civil works

Contingencies
IC charges
Financial charges
Escalation during construction period
Interest on debt during construction period

Additional cost borne by NHAI will be for the following items:

a)
b)
c)
d)
10.4

Environmental Mitigation Cost

Land Acquisition Cost
R & R Cost
Utility Shifting Charges

Economic & Financial Analysis

Results from Economic and Financial analysis for the project are indicated as under. Traffic growth rate considered in
Financial Analysis is 5% per anum.
Since the investment proposal without any government proposal does not yield any result, a 40% grant is considered
in the analysis. The entire grant amount is proposed during the construction phase.
EIRR (Post tax)
NPV
PIRR (Post tax)
VGF
Concession period

15.00%
Rs 139.95 Million with 12% discounting
10.76%
36.69%
30 Years

10.6Recommendations

As per economic analysis the project is found viable. Mobilization of funds should be made available through
budgetary resources.
As per Guide Lines of Model concession agreement (MCA) the project is found viable on BOT basis with 40%
grant. The Project is to be executed on EPC mode

Since the project is generating Considerable economic benefit to the economy it is recommended that the project
should be implemented with budgetary resources.
Document : 1058/RH/REP/FFR/403_1_R1

11 of 11