Professional Documents
Culture Documents
$%!
(% ' &
3 3 2 01& ) ./ +,- )*
4 0
4 0 '*
0 (!
6% 5 3
2012-5
!
" " * "
)' ( ' " & #$ % ! %
\ %1 *2 /"
3
+$ ! +, " - . /0
%,31 *6 5 ! /3 " 5 /( %1 5
7
" 1 *7 8 & / 5 /$ 9,
" ;./ :& / 5 % #",
&
3
;
># #? /". = /1 %7$ 5
.
$ "!
&
-4
!7 05 (
", 2
!9
)
& & 8
2
) & : *

8;
<#
%* 3 *
%
-4
) & : *
03 : *
0 % : *
"
1A1
- 4A1
) ;
5A1
=, 8A 1
11
39
39
45
54
55
1A3
55
57
58
59
61
65
) ;
2A4
71
) 3 / 1A5
72
) 1 2A5
N3 : *
73
5 N3 .1
75
6&R : *
79
80
81
.
2 )W
/ (3) '* 6&

'*A01# '*
03 &
03
56
1- 3
59
2- 3
1- 4
/ *C
3 oracle ERP A
/&1 / 83 / 8
62
2- 4
/ *C
3 oracle ERP A
/&1 / 83 / 8
64
3- 4
/ *C
3 oracle ERP A
65
67
4- 4
5- 4
Q 91 7
3 A *$ . PC
6- 4
68
7- 4
69
Q 91
3 7
- !
8-1
1-2
#$%
%
7
-$
2 7 789 5
;< 34
37
= 5 9 ?>
* ) & :
5
=
/;0
79
= / V
80
(/
81
80 - /. 8E5 / 8F /5@ #A
+$ % *, %. / c" 8$ *; 2 '#
Oracle ERP % A
= E /1 /,
85 *, ! /1 %.1 %@F
/ 8
Oracle ERP% A
" / /"3 *7
*, ! % /00
Abstract
Prepared by:
Asma Marwan ALfaouri
Supervised by:
Dr.Mohammed AL-Shura
The study aimed at detecting the impact of Enterprise Resources Planning (ERP) systems
effectiveness on achieving the distinction of institutional performance in the Greater
Amman Municipality, through the study of the dimensions of the effectiveness of these
systems (Information quality, System quality, User satisfaction) as it considered as one of
the management information systems. This study was based on the reason that the
Greater Amman Municipality has applied ERP systems, which included most of sectors
and jobs and aiming to planning and optimum utilization of human and financial
resources. This project has cost the Greater Amman Municipality approximately 14
million Jordanian Dinars of its budget. In order to achieve the goal of the study, the
researcher designed questionnaire to collect preliminary data , consisting of (30)
paragraph and distributed to members of the study sample. The study's sample contains
the Department of Finance in the Greater Amman Municipality of ERP system users,
which only use the ERP system and the number of participants was (100) user. In the
light of this, data were collected, analyzed, test hypotheses were undertaken by using the
statistical package SPSS. Afterwards, descriptive analysis, variance and correlation
coefficient for the study hypotheses. One of the most significant findings of this study
illustrates that there is an existence of a relationship with statistical evidence between
effectiveness of ERP Systems (Information Quality, System Quality, User Satisfaction)
and their combined impact on institutional performance excellence .
After the emergence of the relationship between the variables of the study the researcher
introduced a number of recommendations that aim to benefit from the outputs of the
study such as the need to cover all the areas under the Greater Amman Municipality with
regards to applying ERP system in order for planning and optimum utilization of the
Greater Amman Municipality resources, the necessity to improve the capacity of users to
the system of the ERP by holding specialized training courses on an ongoing basis, and
the need to implement the principle of participation effectiveness of workers in decisionmaking through their use of the ERP system, as must be the necessity of activating the
system's ability to speed up the processing of complaints and suggestions of employees.
0 %0;
' 5 4
1-1
8 / 8A :& $ !/ /3
3 -7 8A D$
./3 . =
%,3 #3 8( 7
- " 8A
/A
- - g0 f !/A
3 f
%1 8" +$ . /3;
. (Ayyagari, 2010) -"
8A
3 # 9F
- -$ V"
&; 9#@ 8 * F /A1 :& %. ; 2
-$ /0 /" #3 /" !8" $
3 .
. ( Tsai, W., Chen, S., Hwang, E., & Hsu, J.2010 )
/3 * 77 2 '# /
/A 80 5
3 &3 /& /5 8" " /A * 9 %@ /A"
. (Kennerely & Neely, 2001) V 85
1 (ERP)
/A , Dh3 /"0
/ " .Q
/A /3 /"F *9; " /A1 :& .
. (Kennerely & Neely, 2001) % /A
8" /A ; 2 8 5 * 8 $
#& / 8F" /$ ( ERP ) /A
/A 8 *$
% 8$ /A /A
/A 2 !/ /3 / 7
, .C@ 85
3 8 2 %0 8 / " *5 /
) C7 85@ *2 !(SCM ) /"" *2 !/A
/A 8
Tsai; ) / *( /( 8 !(PLM ) P * * *2 !(CRM
/ 8" P /A
/A1 .(lin; Chen & Hung, 2007
" %0 /$( c
3 !/3 *7 " 8A *
% 5 ./$ " #5 / *7 !7 8$ 9,2 !/3 *7
/A
/A ; 2 (Tsai et al., 2007 ) i
!/A *9; +3 !8" * *3 " !7 /A"
* g /A
/A h3 !c 2 /3,2 ./ 8"
+ c - .Q !#5 #" *
/3 %1 8"
, "
. 8"
%0 '# /A
A ; 2 8A h3 !#
5 .(O' Mahony & Doran, 2008)
% *9; 7 % 2
8A " E
) /A1 :& %.
5 /$ #
+,
.(Hillegersberg, 2000
/A /"3 /& = ' " / :& 80 5
/3,( !
Q 91 " /A
/A /"3 . 2 * !/A
!
.8Q 9 " /A
/A ;
.i 2 * ( 2
" /A
/A
. & / :#
1 '# h3
2 ./A
/A /"3 > *;
Q 91
91 + %
3 !% F D "
/A /"3 + %
.+ F D "
Q
:
&$'() % 2-1
( M. Lynne Markus, Sheryl Axline, David Petrie, & Sheryl Cornelis Tanis,2000)
3 f / $
3 !
j
" = /
3 D %
7 " ( , !8" *$ !A *$) &? /A1 :& /"3 .
/;" -A ! (
Q " !/" 8" *9; ) :?
Q 91
.'CA -. % ; $ !/ j
-3
Q 91 7 "
/A
/"3 . " ' .3
. ,
: - 3A1
:5 -
% A no /( 8" A "
+, 1 / #?
.1
.2
.3
.ERP 2
<;34
Q 91
3
/A
.
3 (" ) 89$(
". 9i /3 / :& +
.4
7
3 /"
3 8Q # /
3
. #
Q
:
-
j, % / 9B 8" +$ ." A
2 .1
. D2 #$ D2 j$" f
/A /"3) j, & 8
/ 8 f /"5 .2
. /. " /A1 :& /. (/A
: ) ;
5A1
# j;
!/ /C /,; /l0 8 / /" 2 -
q: #@ 80 PC @ & $
/3 8,3 f@.
:: [;# HO
*$) 6 3 /A
/A
/"; /C02 / . $
7
3 ( 05.0) /&1 = ( , !A *$ !8"
: / 8,; # j; ! = E / =
Q 91
:
;# HO1
91 7 "
/A
/"; /C02 / . $
. ( 05.0) /&1 = A *$ > 3
Q
: ;# HO2
Q 91 7 "
/A
/"; /C02 / . $
. ( 05.0) /&1 = 8" *$ > 3
:5 ;# HO3
Q 91 7 "
/A
/"; /C02 / . $
. ( 05.0) /&1 = , > 3
* *C # 7 j3 = /
3 / *C .2
.#3
A %F
#
A: =,
8A1
8#'<
26 #:
A@)B D.1
.'<
.'F
#6<' $
A@)B
>
?.80$@
12(2) 103-113.
8
3. Alexander Cedric (2009). Case Study: Exploring the effectiveness
of ERP Integration towards managerial performance.(Doctoral
dissertation),Capella university.
Q 91 7 " A /"3 > / :& C@ 2
.
:.H:I
%'/ 9-1
: \? J] H"IH ^T9 [ 47
#" #3&
3 #$ " /A *5 D > Q : #
./"
$
'&1 " A *5 :System Effectiveness '
.A #"$
: (ERP) Enterprise Resource Planning System
'
3 / 8" !C7 85@ *2 !/ *2 !7
/7 :&
!/3 /A *5 77 '# /A
.= E / % +$
% / " % /# : System Quality '
(3
. D /$ *$ !/$" / /$ 85 A 0
!# V 85 !8$ /5 :Information Quality ) 5 (3
D? ) $ !-, #, + #
!# /# /5. /$
/ *$ A / *$ 8 #? 8" '0
. /0 /"o 8" 8 2 2
!A 8$ , : user satisfaction ;
8$ A
E" f !A % , !/ 8$
. D
/ %; :Organizational Performance Excellence
10
A3
JK
@ )
H26
MI
11
. ; l ( M. Lynne Markus, & Sheryl Cornelis Tanis,2000)
85
3 ; # %3 /2 8" A 8A c@ *, " #
#; %$ 1 #5 /( 8" A /"3 /0 " D;
f &
3 c 81 & /;" :? /( 8" A /"3
:/B 8; %
!
/A / A :-
!/"; #; : -.
!%; /( 8" A C0 :-..
/( 8" A /"3 >5 :-
8" *$
A *$
,
.%; /( 8" A /& :-
12
.Q /A /C
3
89$( +C5
& 8" /$ /A
3 /"
/, *3 @ 9 + 8" @.3 ! #3& &
3
/A
3 /C$2 8" #$ %. V +3 / / 8" 8
/A1 :& '# !#$ # /$ 8
V$ 8" :& f 3
/A
3 8" \ 89$( c" / / 2 %
8
3 g, &
" & %1
/A %" D"
%01 *2 ! *2 !8, !83) % / _4 (O'brien, 1991)
7 /"" ! ( /( 8; !
/7 , 1 *2 ! 8
+ (%01 /0 ! 7 *2
!8 !8 *2) %
% / ! ( ; *2 !+ *2 ! *2) %
!
) %
C$( +
+0 ! (
, V 8)
.(' , ! x
/A , x ERP /A
/A ? % c
2 .( / / ) *? 8" /$
3 #" (
) /$2 *? 8" 2 /; & *(
' 2 (Garg,2010) #$ :&7 & , 8 /#$
0" /"5 /5 /
8$ /7 #?
/A Kennerely
/"" * \9 /A
3 /C 'CA" /" %" , 85 >;
! " Q / / C7 85@ *2 7 /5 7
/A" /3 * 77 2 '# /
/A1 :& 8Eo0
13
85 8" c" 3! /& /5 %. / C0 8 8"
.(Kennerely&Neely,2001) 7 &l V
8"" 8Q %
5 P#
&
/A ? % /." c
*? *2 , 89$( c" ",; / D3 #0
. #$ &&7 & ,
14
V0 . V$ * /A &A *&A /";
8$ #? /"; Goyal 'Eo 2 !(Robbins, 1990) # #; " ;
/0 9 , @3 A $ V %.
A
i '
3 ! (Goyal,1998) 8$ *$ >
& /l PC
" A /"3 /$ h3 '&1 #
/$ #? /";"
. (OZ,2000) =1 A %,3 8$ D /$ '& D
: / ) 5 '
& /"; % " / *0 ( %@ #; 2 .
% " #, / * 0 # * 8; &; %$
.. " " B D,
8" A D # = " # " /( 8" A /"3 83 3
.( Hamilton & Chervaney, 1981 )" /A 8F '&1
3 /(
/( 8" A * >" #? -, /( 8" A /"3 83Eo
% +0 /# %#
3 #
/"
C0 8$ "
. (2005!
" ) 8$ :& ; ,
3 " /( 8" A /"3 '
3 Burns & Madey % ;
8" A /"3 h3 /A A /#$ 3 ;" / /A" / ##;
/#$ -" '"
3 #
+3 C 8"
0 %@ /(
C0 8" 3 " A c *5 # " # A 5 ; A
.( Burns & Madey,2001) %3
3 # /
15
j > /"; ' (Elliott & Straking, 1998)
D;
(
3
* , A #"$ $
/F Dl A '& D
#
8 A" /3, / A 9 % /& 2 #
3 V)
./( 8" A $ /# 8 Q ; /A % A
2 # Goyal ' & /( 8" A /"; 5
+1 '
A & /"; /.@. %@ /( 8" A /"3 #;
8$ j 2 " $ A *5 " 2 * ./; *
&
8$ + A 8$ / c " 8" 8" 'CA
8$ 85 /5 /F0
3 , * %. #"$ 8$
.(Goyal, 1998).A
" 8 ' c" ? 8$ #h3 /"; ' " /. j@
/.
A % ; /5 8$ *$ # %
./ %@
"0; % 1 :& 8
81 s
0 # / ) 5 '
?: 1
/$ 3 " D3&
3 /( 8" A $ 2
/0 8" 3 %@ D ; 8$ j D
C0
.-@3 -2 8" A D"$ . /"
- /. 8$ %; / 8" A C0
+ %@
2 V) s ?$ 3 !C0 c" #, # . %
3 #2
8" 8$ C0 %; /( 8" A C0
16
17
. V) A ; c /( 8" /A j ? /Q
/"3 > > 8$ *$ A !; /5 8F "
'@ " 8;0 C0 A 2 /3,( ! /( 8" A
; #"
(8") A 8$ /#
3 V0 ##$ #
8F /. /5 2 -/3,2 !#$ = " " 51 Dh3 .
1 :& " 8;
/ 8 " j@
/$ 8
/
./( 8" /A /"3 >
: 5# ) 5 ?: 1 ) 5 (3
8"
& 0 c" & ) 2 !* 0 8" A l "
3 5 & 8" 3 & A +, /F 1 c !A 8$ %.
#? (Eldon,1997)#3 8" !"#$C 1 " 2" % +
/
. i '
3 8, j,
&; C"
"# C@ V = % # 8 "
& 8" (Alter, 1999)
q :
" = /"; + c
. (Goyal 1998) '&1 A 8$ /"; " q1
/"3 *7 8" 3 /A
3 8" A '# q2
f h3 c (Gallier, 1999) 8
3 /A % *9;
/"3 >
3 #l /A % f V"
& /"; 7 8" A
. /A 8
" A
18
V"
c h3 !- ;0 % -Q; - 3 2 A " " q3
3 /# V$ ? A #$
8" C0 " '
. (Angell,1991) 8" A /"3 *9;
8" A * > " #? " /( 8" A /"3 83 q4
+0 /# %#
3 #
/"
C0 8$ " /(
. (Eldon,1997) " 8$ :& ; , %
> > 8" *$ " (Delon&Mclean,1992) ; q5
8" /A /"3
3 -$ #.
/A1 /"3
./(
` ?> IG -N 4L ( \ Wen-Hsien Tsai,2010) q6
.>$U 4 P8QH 2
L! ]9 7
V"
! - 3 2 8" A " ? % /."
/3
3 /# V$ ? A #$
) 5 ?: 1 " '
. /"
3 #"
A
8" 2 . s 3 8"
3 *$" 8 C0 c&
(Anthoney, Perrewe, Kacmar 1999) q:
" '0 *$
/5 #"$ /;" 8" /$ ?
/ s;
: /5
. #"
. # : / /&$
/" *0 9
2 + D"$ #$ V"
%$" #". # : /
. /"
19
'
(3
D3&1 D = /3 / 8" A > /"; 8
q: .(Atiyyah,1989)
" " A /"; /5@ /.
8" A
. % #, /( 8" A /"3 >5 /& .1
#
3 /( 8" A /"3 2 /(
20
A *$ " g, Q " %0" /# :&
7
. D :Q D5 /( 8"
" A *5 /"; Q 'A & /"; >5 g"
0 2 .2
A /"3 2 9,
3 % D" .( Goyal,1998) " D3&
" D3& " /( 8" A *5
& " /( 8"
/A /"3 > ? A *$ %2 D
3 ( Tsai,2010) .3
$ !A /$ 85 A /5) > "
. A *$ > (8@
8" A D # = " # " /( 8" A /"3 83 .4
#
/$ /A 8F '&1
3 /(
D " A /"3 /$ h3 '&1
8" A /"3 #; Goyal ' 2 A 2 ! (Oz,2000)'&
*
& A & /"; /.@. %@ D3 5 D =3 /(
8$ j 2 " $ A *5 " 2 * 2 ./;
+ A 8$ / c " 8" 8" 'CA
85 /5 /F0
3 , * %. #"$ 8$
8$
2 /" * 2 3 /; . A 8$
21
A c & %E; A ? x : " \9
'CA 8$ j 2 " -5 ! #"$ $ '# /F
/A #; V"0 " D
: > .#"$ o0
0
5 P#
" A &
A Dh3
" * c"
Dh3 8" c" ",; 8 D3 #0 /
3 (Tsai,2010) c 77 .'&1 8F 8" 'CA 8$ j 2
*$ > 2
/A /"3 >
3 f
D
. (Tsai,2010)
A /"3 > *? A
!/# %; / 8" A 7 (Palanisamy & Sushil, 2001)
% A % V #3 A ; " %#
&
/ , 7 ! D :$ '&1 . A" %.1
c V !%; /( 8" A
3 &3 V$ C0 & =2
/ 8" A /C # 7
/, / 8F
V$ !8 0 /$ /3
3 8." /$ /$ /"
! D"3 " /A3" /" 8 /C7$ * 8F 8@ 9$2 D
/" " A *5 2 /0 :& t3 ! / C0 c" 2 ',t
& 8$ 2 ; . /" *0 !D"
; 8$
! #? /"; 8 D /"
8# %1 2
3 A
. /"3
3 *.Q % & 85 % h3 C0 c" -/3,2
$ % ; :0 h3 V 85
3 2 3
? @3 #2 /$ /"
8" %0 "
22
23
/C
3 8F 3 " # A %
/$ # " 00 /;
.( Goyal, 1998) ;
; -
,
/A $ % ; /
% V" 2
/A $ = > /# > 8"
. (Harris & Weistroffer,2009); /
3 ? ; , /5
/
3 & /( 8" A $
3 $2 . ; / 2
.(Paulus, Kwok, & Hock, 2005).
; P
/A ; , >
#;
3 8. 8 l "
24
25
26
4
PI
8#'<
23 .2
&
'& 9; @3 /( 8" A /&
/"
8" /;" 8 /$ j 7
# 2 A
% D;A %@ %; / 8" A , /"
/"; *9;
.(Goyal,1998) / '& 2 #
/A
./, 8
3 /"
8" /A
3 +5 = % 7 .
# % D
3 / 8" " #"0 8" /;0 .V
. /.
.#; /# '0
8" 3 .8
.C@
8" 3 .f
.
3 (/.)/ 8" .x
.#"
8" 8 %" % .
. #
8
% *( .
4
PQ
8#'<
23 #5.3
%@ /A #" %0
/ %; /( 8" A C3
'&6 D D /
1 'CA A c 5 %3 8" A #@
"
/( 8" A C3 2 (Goyal,1998) 2 ;i 8
:
B
.g0 % " g0 85
3 /0 8" .1
8" 3
3 A .2
.#
5 /5
/& 72 :$ 8" ' .3
27
!7 /F c
!*( %$
3 " " 1 %1 %l & 7 l 3
28
$5
3 l 3 B '" & ( & D? 7 'E
.(
#$ *; /$ %@ /5 / #3
.
3 3 %,31 !/3 *7 c &
. ( ( / // /( / *$ / /;" )
$( 91
$ & 2 %0) " ! /)A *5 ! )A
" D -, '
.(2009!i *3 )
/1 1 s 3 D? V = c >;
3
". 31 V
: %. %1 8A
3 7 8 #
%
/C@ /A % ! /A
3 =$ .1 / 8$
" 7;
A %@ D "
.
" /A *5 D?
Q 91 (Peterson, et al, 2003) 'E 5
".# / #3& + /l 8$ x2 !*9; &
9,
3 /A % x /" /A D?" (2000!i ) D3
"./$ /" #C 0 + #";
29
#C + %;
3 /A *5 =
Q 91 ; ; @
/" #" *9; /;" & " #0 " 3 c !/$ /"
.+$ %5 /"
8$ x2
" #"5 %1 /A * -" D 91 ( Eccles, 1991)
91 2 (Robins & Wireman, 1995) % & + ; !#3&
h3 !'@ & l " . " 1 /"
#3& " /A *5 " D
.#3&
3 /A D $ %@ 91 . V"l
@ (
2004!
;5 ) 3 ! *
Q 91 #;
:
& 91 #; /.@. 2 (Venkatraman and Ramanjam, 1986)
/ %. / 8 Q " 7 !96 , #; & :
.
#3 c !
"F 91
91 & +$ : >%
. 8 " %0 '# / " %,3
3 *9; ',
*$ 8 *$ //$ P ! /5 /0 %. 8 Q " & 7
. /
= & !
Q 96 - .1 & :
#
.#3&1 /A
-. / & 8 $ . !8A
3 91 /& " %"
8A
!/0 *0 /( % / *0 *( % V %5
%$ &
3 D& !/$( *( 7 * /& 91 %1
( Empirical
30
!(Ginsberg & Venkatraman, 1985 ) # /$ 8" /;" 8$(
82 %5 7 &( $ %@ /, #A #h3 /( /&1
) 91 PC " - 8A :&
3 $
8 !D$C 91 8A
. ( Hofer, 1980
/ 8A@ 8" +$ * " D?
Q > (2002 !
) '
2 3 !\ \ 8 9 1 & ! D5 j,
5
3 ; 8" # P /A /" D? " ' ". /$ >
3 % ; $ = /3 2 /" '# ! / /5 " 02
? * '&1 ', *
c ! '&1
"./ *0
* +
"; 91 / '# 91 /" ? (2000!$)
*3
3 83@ 83 ' " !/Q /$2 /
3 -
./0 89$( g
+, +
/. h3 ! 91 7 #; 8; " \9
3 #$ = >5 " /A * D?
Q 91 7
C$( #;
.#3&
31
32
/ >" $ 5 2 \
./ -3& C
!/A" =
/A %. !
"
> & ! /A 9 /$2 *0 3
1 PC 2 2 ! /"F # /A /$2 $ > /0@ *
#$C
"
91 %. : ( 5) ^
$ / 8 Q 2 /3,(3 !8A
3 %1 91
/"
P / !*$ 8$ ! /5 /0 91
3 /"F 8 Q > "
=
> &l !/$( ! / /" /"3 !/ (/)
/;" *0 * #A /"F > 91 > , 2 ./A 8" 9
(VenKatraman & ) D ' / 8 Q +
96
.Ramanim,1986
33
91
3
3 / V " (Macmenamin,1999) =
>
3 V"1 & 77 V$ ! /A % /" l /Q
!D$ & , ./A
3 %3 91 >5 A 9 / l 9 >
. Dh3 !/A" %
" 91 & 2 D? (EIIsworth,1983)
(Kaplan & Norton,1992) -GI ./ /" 8& 7 $ %
( Balanced Scorecard) V ' %@
"
91 > %
c" /5
77 ! 91 PC g0;
/ > /5
:& ,
/
!/" 8" !9@ % /" > / 8 Q >
? $ ./A"
" 91 77 f /A
3 j(
7 >5 8F /A
3 j(
/" 8" > " 8 /.
. # +$
3
Q 91
91 % 1 +1 #; /A /"; %. :
#
(Cameron& = .
"
91 % > D
3 % %
/ D D&; & " V D Whetten,1993)
/A /$( *( f %$
3 /0 ! /( 8 $ '"
3 91
# /
'
1 8$ /A '&6 / /
D"
A /A
" % !/A
3 g0 V0 '& /A /";
F 2 !&
/E; /A1 /7 91 85
t . '
1 '" '&1 :& >5
Et
! (2009!
)
D E V
A 91 >5
3 /
. 8Q 9 >5
3 *$
34
" ) 7 91 /5
" /. 85 &
3
. = / /Q 9 7 > (/" 8" *9; !
Q
*
> C #. /$ % / ; A V0 2005 %"
. * 8C02 #Q 9 % /50 8 8" &7 /
8
%1 / ; %7
-Q
(Dilla & Steinbart,2002) . = ! 8
c" 9,
3
3 !91 >5 /$# " /&$ 8@ %2 *, (Kaplan&Norton,2001)
!/05 8 51 9
3 &1 0
& / 8 Q 8
. A 3 % , g0 *$ 8"
"# c2 7 +
.
+ /7 91 >5 /5
(Kaplan&Norton,2001) . s 5 !&
9@ % " = / V$ V$ 2 % 91 >5
2
. " 8""
" %F
91 > 05
3 @. /7 91 >5 /5
5 9 >C +3
( Hoque et al.,2001) ( Dater et al.,2001) . 5 /
(Norreklit,2000)
35
+ %" g"0 / /
0 %$1 " / > 2
/ / *$ % /" /$( 8" %&$ %
.% ,
f
l / PC > 91 > g, > 2 /$ 8A 8$
/
* / " 8 0 91 '& +,
3 D *;@
.'&1 /" P / / F ? "
% 8 8 f@. %
3 ! 1992
3 Kaplan & Norton % 5
( HBR) Harvard Business Review /"$
3 /7 91 >5 /5
j,
2 /$( /$ (BSC) Balanced Scorecard ) /7 91 >5 /5
%3
.( Kaplan&Norton ,1992 , 1993 , 1996a,1996b )
$ A " #? Balanced Scorecard /7 91 >5 /5
'
/5
D$ 91 / > "
, /$( / >
/" 8" 7 D$ % !
"
96 /7 91 >5
2 /A /$( /5 /$ g, %@ D$ "
. ( Kaplan , Norton ,1996) /" > '&
96 > % " #$2 /A / % /$ /
"
&
. ( Horngren, foster, Datar,2000)#$2 % 7
36
/Q
& ,
"3 % 2 /$( /$ " #; " #? '
> A
$" /$ % #$2 /A
. 8$@ / /$ 8 $
3 91 >5 '& +, "
* * % 7 " /; " /7 91 >5 /5
%
l / > %
0 = 7 %1 /$2 >
Kaplan )
$
" 91 V$ /$ / ( 8 Q /
>" A
3 8 ) 2 A
& /7 91 >5 /5
(&Norton,2001
/F 7 , % 2 #$ #$2 #Q g, 8A (
2 /3,2 /$ PC /" %1 8" % % /
$
2 c % 2 , /F" /C PC
$ 91
./A"
1 c :E
#? &A /#$ /7 91 >5 /5
' /. +
" \9
D$C +5 ; +5 % 2 /A" /$( /
/$ /A /
! /A # s 5
8 /#$ ; %@F C
.D +$
3 /A c" 91 = 9 +
#
)
& / / " /A A /#$ /5
" /1 *;
/"F /5
0 c ( " , /" 8" , C7 ,
.%1 /$2 = 0 =
3
./ %F 8" /$( Q
/7 91 >5 /5
?
37
<K
% VF ?8 3#$
.
/K
23 ?.P (1-2)!
.@.H
38
( C7 9,( - /" 8" 91
83 /$ "
Foster , Datar , Horngren , 2000 )
C / /2 '0 )
& /" 8" 9 /5 / > &
.( 8" A / , 7@ 85 % ! /"
j j %3 !# /" 8" 9 *9; /A *9; 2 %
!/ 8$ 2 8@ :& % 2 '# /" $ 8$ 8@
8$ 05? &; / 8" /&? /A " j5 @3
./"; *9;
3 /3 *7 /A
8
/$ /" 8" %.
"
*( &
/" 8" 2 2 (Kaplan&Atkinson, 1998 )
!:, " %0
% 2 / %02 1 c !>C % 9@
8;0 V / /"" / 2 x D A; DC
39
3 ( 91 = /( 8" /A *9; = C02 / /$2
.8$ :&
40
3 / *2 8$ /3 *9; " ' 2 / 83&
/
3 /". /1 /;0 8Q
(21) / +$ E 2 .
Q 91 #5@ " V " 9
#3 "
8Q
& /;0 8Q (4) # !/;0 /Q
..?3 @ (50)
/3 *9; /$2 /5@ $ 2 / PC 8
*9; /$2 /5@ $ !
Q #C /1 /;0 8Q
3 /
!
Q #C /1 /;0 8Q
3 " 9 8$ /3
#C " V 8$ /3 *9; /$2 /5@ $ 2 /3,(
.
Q
&
) 5 3
"
5 (2007 )
."
/Q 9 /"3
3 8" $ 2 / :& 83&
$ +5 " '5 %@ 2005q1996 *; %@ /1 *
!2005q1996 8 %@ #3 F *
/Q
3 / 8"
.91 *9; 8" $ /5@ /
'
41
3 /A *5 = D?
Q 91 / D %@ f '
*9; /;" & " #0 " 3 c !/$ /" #C + %;
.+$ %5 /"
8$ x2 /" #"
'
%5 D" * 8Q 9 ? f P
/ . 8 Q 2 j$ V"
c #$ /Q %
>5 8 Q /& -, P !/Q"
" 91 " #@
.
Q 91 > /;
( q q q q 'C# "
5 (2007 ) ( %
."' =,
7
3 '*!
91 #; V$ "52
3 * /3 /$ ' 2 / 83&
/ *
" %&Q >$ 8F /3 c" .? /$ !7
Q
9,
3 * cC 8$ 9,
3
x
. !% +5
/ (218) / / 8 5 ./. /( 8&$
8 (181) ! 3 51 9Q !( ;
.( 2006/2005)
" V$ "52
3 >
#; V$ "52
3 * /3 /$ 2 / PC 8
91 #; ? " 3 # /$ " !/ 8 7
Q 91
/$ 8 3 !
$
*2 8 7
Q
./3; /9 /( 8 " #
42
q )! 'q 9q 1q
"
5 (2008)
."5 5
'5
82 9 0 9
3 %. >C % 7$2 2 / 83&
Q 91 +5 " ' 2 / 8 !/"
3 " /
#" %
/C !/ / /"
3 " / 8(
5 !
""
;0 P# / sl1 .91 0
> /C& 9, !- (42) & " / / +$
5 .- - (14) & " / *7
C !-, (32) &
82 9 0 9
3 %. >C % 7$2 2 / 8"0
8 Q /; /C /$ " % /"
3 " /
./;
q
6 9 3
2 ( 05 3 6& " (2008 ) "
."
/A /A
/$ $ % 2 / 83&
g, /" 8 0 8
"F / " / :& 9$2 %@
. /A
/A
8 '" D$
/1 8
/ /$2 $ ) %. /A % % c& D 2 f P
*( 7 !F *2 5 ! ( ERP ) /A + *$ % 89$2
c&
!C# 9 !+ *2 5 !"
43
C /" $ %. /A x *.Q %
./A
/A 7
- C
5 (! ) *R5 "
5 (2008 ) (
."
5 '5 (
2
*7C$
3 8 /3 *2 8"
/5@ ' 2 / 83&
7
!/3 8$ ) /3;
Q 91 7
. c"
!7 ! ! ) /3 *2 8" !(/$ /" 8 0 !
3
!/1
" *7
3
Q 91 7 " /5@ :& . (
!+7
/ sl1 .> % f
Q 91
3 f
3 83&
2 / 80" 5 .'A (300) & " ;A / " / +7
7 /3 *2 8" /3 *2 8"
/C02 / 8 /5@ $
.
Q 91
q '
6 9 3
[3& 05 "
5 (2010) &
." Baan LN '
)
1 ) % 2
#
/ 8
3 * % & 2 / :& 83&
* /5; / :& 8"
,.ERP %
% 3 $
3 .1
.A &
% 3 $ % / /$ 8"
A
+3
8" +$ /
3 8 " /. A /#$ +3 83
% / /5
!/7 8" * #
A
3 /
.A &
8" %
:
3 0 #? A
83
44
./ /;"q1
.%90 " 7 / % ; /q2
% /5@ $ T-test % PC %" / 8"0 5
%@ $ .A
$ / /A j !/
.&1
& /A % x
q
q- q4 ) q*R "
5 (2010 )
1 3
"
& !f@. #" *( 85@
% 2 ' 2 / 83&
% :& /5@ !/. /" !/" /" !/" %5 /"
/ (36) 8 / " / 8$ f .
Q 91 " &.
./ 6
"3
3 /$ / /& 8
*( 85@ /C02 / 8 /5@ $ 2 / PC 8 5
/ 8 /5 /5@ $ 2 8
3 !
Q 91 /" /" %5
.
Q 91 /. *( 85@ /C02
q: 5 2 (]%
6 P * "
5 (2011) )
1q ) % 2 A5
1 ) %
/ 2
."5 1
3
) 8Q
/A
= . 2 / 83&
/ /& /0 8 = . " C " (ERP
87 / 0 /Q
/A
= > !/
/7@ 8 8$ !/ /0
3 ## /$ /0 8 "
45
$ / 8 .(2010) 8 :& * / 8
" C " /$ /1 D /Q
/A
= .
.
/ /$ /0 8
3 .
.6: )
2-2-2
85
8 " / #@ #5 #77 !/A
46
PC
" / :& 77 5 ./A
/A
" / 8$ ./A
A / .B 8
8
A
3 /@ 8F 2 PC 8 !
3 / (247) 8 /
$ " .Q
; ,5 %
3 *
3 /A
8A
*7 *, 2 PC ./A
A
c 2 !#3 8" 9 /"3 " &. /A
/A /&?
.&F / '&1 5
3 /A
3
Q 91 " /A
A . ' 2 / 83&
:& " %1 8" " /"0 8F . 2 /3,( !/; 8
$ /
/3 8
3 /" (14) %@ / 8$ ./A1
9 " &.? /A1 :& 7 >5 '# /A
/A
./A
/A + 7; /; /5@ " ? 2 / 80"
8A * + :& /$ /5 7" ' /A
/A
A
, *, " / 8 !/A
A
./A
A ;
8A 7 +3
3 &.? *7 '#
47
48
j
8 / (79) /. /$ 8
3 !/A
./A
/A E
91
3 / 8 3 $ 2 / PC 8 5
8# .#
49
. f
3 8"$ 5 8" /A
3 8F 2 / 80"
" *5 " A /"3 * 8# /C
"
#3 = +3 2 / 80" .'A , + ## 9
: DC 'A 9 " &. /A1
A /"; #2
.,
"Measuring the Impact of Enterprise
5 (Morris, 2009 )
Resource Planning (ERP) Systems Through the Prism of Accounting
Theory"
A %@ /A
A /"3 . >5 2 / 83&
V " /A
A . ' 2 /3,( !/ /A
/ " / 8$ ./ 8" " /"
, !/& /5 !/(
/A
A ; " % /0 (33) %. / (147) 8
.(2003 q1994)
V " .? c" /A
A 2 / 80"
8" /0 /"
, " $2 . c"
3 /& /5 /(
8" /A? /"0 8 8 f
3 # PC :& ? 2 ./
A ; 'A /&1 c2 7 !/
.8Q :& 9 /"3 " &. #Q
3 /A
"Interdependence and
50
% $ " /A
A /"3 . 2 / 83&
'" /"# / x 77 2 / 8 . j
/C
3
A
/ :& 83# 2 ./A
A ; /$ 7
+7 2 !* 1
3 C A
3 /A
./ / " '1 V
% . 8
/ 8 /5@ $ 2 / 80" 5
83@ / 8
3 !/A
; /$ /$(
g, /& .1 % / 2 / PC 8 ./" % .
./A
; % 3 $
3 /& %
"Evaluating User Participation And
5 (Gibbs, 2010 )
User Influence in An Enterprise System"
. ! / % /" /5@ ' 2 / 83&
./A
A
3 / 8 + 8" , !
./ j, /"0 8 8 c
"" P# / 8
./A
/ 'A (20) 8 / " / 8$ 5
A * /A
/A 2 / 80" 5
!8 /3 9
3 * / / D3 " !
" =7F
$ 2 / PC 8 5 . #
8 #
F
2 /$ c& 2 !8"
, *7 /5@
./A
/A j
/$ / , 7@ #$ %
51
52
3
3 # /A
A ; 2 / 80"
8$ /" 85 %" 2 /3,( ! +
" !/;" s; !8"
% " 8 /A
A 3 2 PC 8 .c"#
8
" ,; .? c" # 2 !8" 2 %0
3 / !8"
./. /
"Impact of Enterprise Resource q
q
5 (Garg,
on
Organizational
Productivity
in
an
2010 ) q
q
Information
Planning
."Technology Organization
/ $ 8 " ' D /" / :& 8"
/1 % f 5 *9; /$( c /A1
%# !*( :%. /A
A
/
3 &3
, j 2 !89$( !/A /3. !8" c !/A"
A
.C7 ;A
5 /A
/A1 g0
; / :&
3 PC 8#A
7 D .A :& %.
3 8.
8A /$2 85 87
#h3 / :& " /
3 * % f &
/$2 77
91 V C7 ;A /A" /$2 *7
.% 8$ /" 51 %@ #" 8A
"A Study of the Impact of Business q
5 (Tsai et al., 2010) q
."Process on the ERP System Effectiveness
53
.
3 #" 8
/A
/A /3 > /
. 9, !8" !A *$ :
B 0
"The Impact of ERP Implementation
5 (Huang, 2011 )
on Organizational Capabilities and Firm Performance"
/$ " /A
/A ; . ' 2 / 83&
./A"
Q 91 & 77
/A 8 " /A
3 %1
; /5@ " /A 8 %1 /$ . 2 /
8 / " / 8$ 2 .
Q 91 /A
/A
.# /. 8 +$ / (400)
$2 . c" /A
/A ; 2 / 80"
54
, " 3 %
*9; + * *$ 8$ 9 " % !P 0 , 2 /;"
.%01 " C 77 /7@ /;
55
K 01#
3C
1A3
;A /3 9i #" %0 8" / /
5@
3 / *C
3 /A
ORACLE ERP suite A
(2) 5 " g, & 'A 100 & 7 j3 = /
56
:#
>
63.5
61
,
36.5
35
2
100
96
83
56.3
54
35A26
30.2
29
45 A36
13.5
13
]
46
100
96
83
29.2
28
'
64.6
62
5 3
6.3
)
100
96
83
3.1
96.9
93
$
&
P 3
5
5
57
100
96
83
3.1
1 0*
92.7
89
) 3A1
2.1
N 05 )
) 5A4
2.1
) 5
Oracle '
ERP
100
96
83
%5 /
Q 91 7 F 2 /3,( Wiese, J.E(1999))
/C 97$ /.@.
3 / 0 5 .( (2007, /) (Ababneh,R.A(2008);
:
"
! 83 (5) %@ /3F C0 " 8F %1 % ( )
+ % 8 !
;A +5 !
" = ! ! >$) /,
. ( Oracle ERP % A
58
3
3
* 3
8$ (2)
8$ (3)
8$ (4)
8$ (5)
59
>; + F 7 (V) % F 7 2
$
"
$
3 (1q)
% /5 8 2 /
F s; 2 Q ' (V) % F 7 2 ,F
. g0 > +
. one sample T- test. .5
: C ( 61 5A3
( "- 61
" / s /. 85 / *
3 &A 0 >5 sF
$ %$
3 > /C& 9, 0 /$
8 /" /&; /F" 8A@ /$ 2 !(1") 8"
.
( )
#@0 ?" / 1 (Cornobach Alpha) % V
( Alpha 0.60 ) ; / f >"
(2q3) %$ ! /( /( " /" 8
3 /
/
:/ 1 ; 5
5 # )R 5 '* (2A3) 03
# 0 5
)#
5
0.74
8" *$
0.81
A *$
0.78
,
0.85
15
Q 91 7
0.79
25
60
(%70) / 8; ; % 5
(2q3) %$ f
. (%79) " f.
61
N 01#
) ;# : 1&4 0& %*
: 1A4
#2 %0
C0( %" PC s 2
C % %0; & '#
. (SPSS) /$ "" /C0( 7 P %@
O:
< 2A4
:
# 5 O:
<
%1 >C / %Q
*$) f = /
3
/A /"3 .? =
m
Q 91 7 " ( , !A *$ !8"
.) 5 (3 5 6
) 2 65 A
= *; /& / 83 / 8
% /. 8
.(1q4) %$ g,
&
C0( %" 8" *$ o 8;
*$ 8; = /&1 / 83 / 8
(1q4)%$
/ *C
3 oracle ERP A
8$( -3 8"
(1A4)03
) 5 (3 .1
'
t 5
$& 4
-
" 5
&
( 5
N#
121.680
0.32
4.021
N#
87.431
0.45
4.00
N#
106.265
0.37
4.01
) 5
C 01& ) 5
C# ERP0 '
ERP 0 '
)/5
&
ERP0 '
) 5 >
05
# ) ;
0
1
2
3
62
4.01
A
8$2 V 8" *$ 83 %" 2 (1q4)%$
+ / (4.021q4.0) # / 8
8 f / *C
) 5 " )
* 89$ 2 (4.01) #
= *; /& / 83 / 8
% /. 8
.(2q4) %$ g,
&
C0( %" A *$ o 8;
*$ 8; = /&1 / 83 / 8
(2q4)%$
/ *C
3 oracle ERP A
8$( -3 A
(2A4)03
'
(3 .2
'
N#
t
5
68.041
71.656
$& 4
-
" 5
&
( 5
0.55951
3.8854
0.53270
3.8958
N#
) 5
*; ERP% A 8"
/;" 8
0
1
%1 /
, V
N#
62.978
0.59152
3.8021
63
/;" " 8$ /"
N#
N#
65.785
0.58180
90.456
0.44117
3.9063
4.0729
3.9125
(
4
5
*C A
8$2 V A *$ 83 %" 2 (2q4)%$
+ / (4.0729q3.8021) # / 8
8 2 /
ERP% A 7 ) * 89$ 2 (3.9125) #
'h (4.0729)
1 /&1 ( ( /#
7) * 8"
3 .(3.9125)
+ / (0.441170)
*1 /&1 \ ( /;" " 8$ /" " D ERP% A
/
(0.591520)
'
(3.8021)
+$ / 8
" = h3 % A *$ (3.9125)
.-; 8;
. ; 5 6
) 2 65 A=
= *; /& / 83 / 8
% /. 8
.(3q4) %$ g,
&
C0( %" , o 8;
64
, 8; = /&1 / 83 / 8
(3q4)%$
/ *C
3 oracle ERP A
8$( -3
(3A4)03
; .3
'
t 5
$& 4
-
" 5
&
( 5
) 5
0
8" $ *
N#
40.100
0.85
3.46
ERP % A
8
/,( s
N#
52.303
0.76
4.1
3 8# #
ERP% A
3.76
A
8$2 V , 83 %" 2 (3q4)%$
+ / (4.1q3.46) # / 8
8 2 / *C
/,( s) * 89$ 2 (3.76) #
65
) ;
3A4
%@ !/ 8,3 " V$ &
3 /. 8"
" 8")t
!/ 8F /" 8F .1 $(
:
" c ! #? / /" >
: [;#
\) 5 (3) 5t
# : 1&! / , 3 /
u
6&
53 (' ; \'
(3
.(0 .05 ) /
1 % .1 " %" /,; :&
( , !A *$ !8" *$) &? /A
/A /"3
PC (4q4)%$ = / =
Q 91 7
3 /$
.%"
/A /"3 .1 %" PC (4q4)%$
' (3
) 5 (3
0.28
0.53
0.1
5
(BETA)*
66
3 F P
Q 91
3 7
3 8F (0.60) D5
. 8$ 8F" ! = /
3 /A
/A /"3
67
*$ . 2 ' %$
%" 2 /,; :&
" x *5 2 '" ( R2) 5
Q 91 7
3 8"
PC (5q4) %$ ! # -3 + F % F .1 ;
.%"
91 7
3 8" *$ . /3
%" PC (5q4)%$
Q
Sig
(DF)
()
) 3
0 5
/
&
& 4
(F)
&
(R2)
(R)
0 5
0 5
&
4
1
.000
90
91
) 5 (3
0.57
44.1
0.33
0.57
6&
3 7
3 8" *$ /C02 / . $
C0( %" PC
% . ( .05 ) = (0.57)R
% " 2
Q 91
Q 91 7
3 8F (0.33) D5 ,(0.33) | 3 (R2)
8F" ! = /
3
A 8" *$
3 F P
8" *$
3 * /$ & *7
& (0.57) .? /$
/5 .1 & / Q (0.57) /
Q 91
3 7
3 *7 2 Q
. (44.1) 8F"
/ F
: "
/" /,; %5 1 /; /,; %5 /0 Q &
68
6&
) 5 (3 : 1& / ", 3
.( .05 )
/
.( .05 ) /
A *$ . 2 ' %$
%" /,; :&
#3
Q 91
3 7 = E /
3 /A
A
.%" PC g, (6q4)%$
(DF)
()
#$@8
8
<8
Q
PH%
%3I
(F)
(R2)
(R)
8
<8
8
<8
P%$
1I
0.50
0.70
1
.000
90
91
0.7
86.1
6&
'
(3
69
.( .05 ) /
. /5@ 2 ' %$ %" /,; :&
Q
Sig
(DF)
#$@8
Q
PH%
8
<8
()
%3I
(F)
(R2)
(R)
8
<8
8
<8
P%$
1I
0.26
0.51
1
.000
90
91
0.51
31.25
6&
' ;
70
,
3 * /$ *7
&,(0.51) .? /$ /5 8F" ! =
.1 & / Q ,(0.51) /
Q 91 7
3 *7 2 Q
.(31.25) 8F"
/ F /5
D "
/" /,; %5 , /.. /; /,; s3 Q &
/
6&
' ; : 1&! / , 3
.( .05 )
71
P 01#
) 1 O:
%*
) 3
/ 1A5
.? /
8" 8,3 -, 85 8 Q *
2 / 83&
/$( / /" %
3 8# PC * 2 8"0 !/ 8F
PC 8 f 8$ :& 7 2 * ( & /. % . #,3 # Q
%5 (ERP ) /A
A 8" *$ .? = %"
1 V 1 / (4.01) "
% .? D A
% A
3 A / 8" *$ /& " % & /
%5 A *$ .? = %" PC 8#A D
3 A
1 V /. / (3.91) "
.? D A
(ERP)
A , .? %" PC 8 /
1 V /.. / (4.02) "
Q 91 7 " .? D
./& D /& 1 %5 & /
A /"; /C02 / -. c& 8#A / h3 /$
3 /$ ( , ! A *$ ! 8" *$) 6 3 /A
/"; /C02 / . $ ( .05 ) D =
Q 91 7
( , ! A *$ ! 8" *$) 6 3 /A
A
. ( .05 ) D =
Q 91
3 7
3 : %
72
) 1:(2A5)
/" A
( # %0
,/ :& /0" PC %@
%0 8"
C0( %" +5 #" %0
PC c
:/ 80
:&
3 #
/A /"3 1 *, .1
. A & =0 *C; # /
Oracle % A
= E /1 /,
+$ % *, .2
%.1 %@F & #& A & *$ '&1 c ERP
./Q
/ 8
ERP% A 85 *, .3
% D
A C; #3 ! % /00
. / %#
%@ 8 /0
3 " / /"3 *7
*, .4
.Oracle ERP % A #
. " 8 = /$ + " A * %; *, .5
%" 3 = E /
3 8" $ * 7 *, .6
. Oracle ERP% A
D$ 5
% " /
/A /"; " 3 8 7 % /.
0 .7
. :; $ / /7 /1 ')" 5 A & /A
/A /"; *$ ? -, *$ 8 % /.
0 .8
. q = E / /A 9 " &. /
73
1 : *
5 N3
" C " *?
. >5 .(2011) !8 .1
/0 8 " /
/ q/ /0 8
3 .
8A
3 ; % > %
" !q/ /0
3 /$
./. 805
3 / %1
!
Q 91
3 &. /( 85@1 .(2010 ) !0 83 !$ .2
.>" !/
$ /$ !/. /5
!/Q
A
$
3 /$ % .(2010) = ! .3
." 8"
1 /$ !* l $ /
/ *2 /$ /"3 *9; >5 .( 2006 ) !80 .4
74
.10
8$
3 /( 8 5 9Q A /#$ ( 91
." 8" / /$ !* l : /
!/ /1
!
Q 91 /"3
3 8" $ (2007)
;0 !/
.11
.12
.13
.14
.+7 "
+$ / . E.
.(2009) %$ Vl !0 %$ V !0 % !
.15
75
1.
Tsai, W., Chen, S., Hwang, E., & Hsu, J.. (2010). A Study of the
Impact
of
Business
Process
Effectiveness. International
on
the
Journal
of
ERP
System
Business
and
for
the
defendant
variable.
Information
system
research,V.3,N.1, P 60-95 .
6. Garg, M.A.(2010). Impact of
Organizational
Productivity
Organization,(Unpublished
an
Information
Doctoral
Technology
dissertation),
Walden
University.USA.
7. Kennerely, M.I. & Neely, A.N (2001). Enterprise Resource Planning:
analyzing the Impact of Integrated Manufacturing Systems,12(2).
8. Alexander Cedric (2009). Case Study: Exploring the effectiveness of
ERP
Integration
towards
managerial
performance.(Doctoral
76
9. Atiyyah,Hamid
S.(1989).Determinants
of
computer
system
Karin,(1992).Construct
measurement
in
management
Ramaraj.,
&Sushil.(2001).Empirically
testing
the
77
BOOKS
27.Goyal, D.P.(1998). Management information systems: Coceptand
application , Deep& Deep publications. New Delhi.
Business information
78
79
(1) 6&
' &
3
0//$
/ $ .
+ .
80
81
82
83
84