Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Experiments Title:
Prepared by:
Bi
l
Name
Matrix No
2015834488
2015217522
2015834486
2015875398
2015836814
Signature
Lecturers Name:
Date Performed
:__31/10/16___
Approved by : _____________________
Date Submitted
: _7/11/16_____
Received by : _____________________
*Please submit your report to the technician within 1 week after the experiment is
performed
TABLE OF CONTENT
NO.
CONTENTS
PAGE
Cover
Table of Contents
1.0 Overview
3-5
2.0 Objective
3.0 Theory
6-8
4.0 Apparatus
10
11 - 17
7.0 Discussion
18
10
8.0 Conclusion
19
11
9.0 References
20
1.0 OVERVIEW
This is your typical fan coil, the air blowing across this fan coil is
warm, and after blowing across the fan coil is cooled down significantly. As
the refrigerant crosses the evaporator coil, it evaporates from a low
temperature liquid to a low temperature gas. It is then transported back
out to the outdoor condensing unit where it is compressed again and the
cycle starts all over.
The first use of refrigeration system is in 1756 by William Cullen at
the University of Glasgow in Scotland, and when i widespread use in
commercial from 1870 till present. Refrigeration is used widely in various
applications from industrial to domestic situations, mainly for the storage
and transport of perishable foodstuffs and chemical substances. It has the
prime function to remove heat from low temperature region and it can
also be applied as a heat pump for supplying heat to a region of high
temperature.
2.0 OBJECTIVE
1.
compression
refrigeration system at different cooling load.
2. To determine the volumetric efficiency of the compressor used in refrigeration cycle.
3. To determine of the overall heat transfer coefficient in the condenser and the
evaporator.
3.0 THEORY
A refrigeration cycle works to lower and maintain the temperature of a controlled space by
heat transfer from a low to a high temperature region.
QH
Wnet
QL
Low Temperature Reservoir,
TL
Refrigeration duty is another term for the cooling effect of the refrigeration system, which is
the rate of heat being removed from the low temperature region with specified evaporation
and condensation temperatures. The unit for duty measurements is in Watts (for 1 ton of
Refrigeration = 3517W).
systems will have a receiver immediately after the condenser and before
the metering device, where the refrigerant is stored until it is needed for
heat removal in the evaporator.
4-1 Evaporating of the low pressure liquid during which heat is absorbed from the low
temperature source.
Energy Transfers Analysis
1) Compressor
q 1-2 = h2 - h1+w
if compression is adiabatic, q 1-2 = 0, and w =h1-h2
Power requirement, P =m(h1-h2), where m is flow rate of working fluid per unit time.
2) Condenser
q 2-3 =h3-h2+w
w=0, therefore q 2-3 =h3-h2 and rate of heat rejection Q2-3 =m(h3-h2)
3) Expansion Valve
q 3-4 =h4-h3+w
w=0, therefore q3-4 =h4-h3 and process is adiabatic,
therefore h4=h3
4) Evaporator
q 4-1 =h1-h4+w
w=0, therefore q 4-1 =h1-h4 and rate of heat absorbed Q4-1 =m(h1-h4)
h2-h1
4.0 APPARATUS
Condens
Evaporat
or
Expansion
Valve
Compress
10
5.0 PROCEDURES
5a) Condenser-water and evaporator-air
1. Air was selected as a heat source by opening valves AVS-3 and AVS-5. Start button
was clicked.
2. Water flow rate at condenser was adjusted to 5 L/m and air flow of the evaporator was
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
11
6.0 RESULT
Table 1: Data Summary table
Evap - Air
Cond - Air
Time (s)
SC-2 = 5 L/m
Evap - Air
b
Evaporator heat
load
Condenser
cooling load
Cond - Water
a
ST-2
(oC)
ST-3
(oC)
ST-4
(oC)
SP-1
(bar)
SP-2
(bar)
SC-1
(L/h)
SW-1
(W)
180
41.3319
13.8802
19.7065
9.46003
1.96803
25.3534
464.532
360
41.5781
14.1563
19.9447
9.54755
2.00061
24.7791
466.441
540
41.7589
14.3137
20.1686
9.59654
2.00412
25.9932
466.789
720
41.8591
14.526
20.5431
9.6414
2.0364
25.5694
469.885
900
41.8914
14.1909
19.6247
9.61796
1.99818
25.4271
468.624
180
41.5038
15.2243
22.5426
9.62581
2.12847
26.7644
475.693
360
42.2773
16.6809
23.0527
9.89399
2.26116
27.9984
482.525
540
42.5165
16.9496
22.8681
9.96536
2.29221
27.8076
484.457
720
42.5347
16.8911
22.9183
9.95239
2.278
27.9223
488.285
900
42.611
17.0636
23.105
9.98166
2.30148
27.9099
480.465
180
41.9164
15.0739
20.4979
9.60197
2.05177
25.854
467.901
360
42.1971
15.7339
21.4005
9.78866
2.10322
26.5478
472.698
540
42.8197
16.0673
21.4318
9.98742
2.14298
26.2924
474.495
720
43.2936
16.2972
21.7661
10.1612
2.16561
26.8564
474.184
900
43.3553
16.5566
21.847
10.1752
2.20022
26.4382
478.949
180
43.8181
16.9267
23.6016
10.3624
2.2765
28.0296
482.595
360
44.8049
18.2299
23.9859
10.6773
2.3967
28.8083
490.1
540
44.8227
18.4104
23.8953
10.6946
2.41736
29.036
491.345
720
44.8099
18.2798
23.7414
10.6706
2.39286
28.7988
486.449
900
44.5708
18.1062
23.4942
10.5611
2.36061
28.3866
484.685
12
0.008036
h3,
(kJ.kg)
255
h4,
(kJ.kg)
420
Qevap
(W)
1.32592
2.854315
0.000877208
0.007847
260
420
1.255453
2.691558
7.22034E-06
0.000877804
0.008225
261
420
1.307848
2.801799
720
7.10261E-06
0.000878135
0.008088
261
421
1.294126
2.754133
900
7.06307E-06
0.000878242
0.008042
261
420
1.278723
2.728676
180
7.43456E-06
0.000876962
0.008478
261
430
1.432719
3.011857
360
7.77734E-06
0.000879543
0.008842
261
425
1.450166
3.005368
540
7.72433E-06
0.000880356
0.008774
262
425
1.430178
2.952124
720
7.75619E-06
0.000880418
0.00881
262
425
1.435976
2.940858
900
7.75274E-06
0.000880678
0.008803
262
425
1.434915
2.986512
180
7.18168E-06
0.000878324
0.008177
260
425
1.349134
2.883376
360
7.3744E-06
0.00087927
0.008387
260
425
1.383847
2.927553
540
7.30345E-06
0.000881387
0.008286
265
425
1.32581
2.794152
720
7.46011E-06
0.000882998
0.008449
265
430
1.394022
2.939835
900
7.34394E-06
0.000883208
0.008315
265
430
1.371987
2.864577
180
7.78599E-06
0.000884782
0.0088
270
431
1.416784
2.935766
360
8.00229E-06
0.000888217
0.009009
270
435
1.486549
3.033156
540
8.06554E-06
0.00088828
0.00908
270
435
1.498193
3.04917
720
7.99967E-06
0.000888235
0.009006
270
435
1.486032
3.054854
900
7.88518E-06
0.000887398
0.008886
265
431
1.475032
3.043281
Time
Vref( m3/s)
v2 (kg/s)
mref (kg/s)
180
7.04261E-06
0.000876395
360
6.88308E-06
540
COP
Working Fluid
ST-2,ave
(oC)
ST-3,ave
(oC)
ST-4,ave
(oC)
SP-1,ave
(bar)
SP-2,ave
(bar)
SC-1,ave
(L/h)
SW-1,ave
(W)
13
14.2134
1
19.9975
3
2.00146
9
2.00146
9
25.4244
3
467.2541
42.2886
5
16.5619
22.8973
3
9.88384
2
2.25226
2
27.6805
1
482.285
42.7163
9
15.9457
8
21.3886
4
9.94288
7
2.13276
26.3977
7
473.6452
Exp (b)
Cond-Air Evap-Air
SC-2 = 5 L/m
Exp (a)
Cond-Water Evap-Air
41.6838
9
44.5652
8
17.9906
23.7436
7
10.5931
7
2.36880
6
28.6118
4
487.0345
Condenser cooling
load
Working Fluid
Vref( m3/s)
v2 (kg/s)
mref
(kg/s)
h3,
(kJ.kg)
h4,
(kJ.kg)
Qevap
(W)
COP
14
7.06234E-06
0.000879591
7.68903E-06
0.000881037
7.33272E-06
Exp (b)
Cond-Air Evap-Air
SC-2 = 5 L/m
Exp (a)
Cond-Water Evap-Air
0.000877557
0.000887382
7.94773E-06
0.00804
8
0.00874
1
0.00832
3
0.00895
6
259.6
420.2
261.6
426
263
427
269
433.4
1.29241
2.76609
1.43679
2.97934
1.36496
2.88189
9
1.47251
3.02324
15
Sample Calculation:
Experiment a
For the experiment a and experiment b, volume flow rate of the refrigerant, vref can be
calculate the value by convert the unit from the value of SC-1 (L/h) as shown below:
When SC-1 = 25.3534 L/h,
1 hr
1 m3
Thus V ref =25.3534 3600 s 1000 L
7.04261 106 m3 / s
The specific volume of the working fluid which is refrigerant, v2 is taken by refer to
appendix of Table A-11 for saturated refrigerant-134a by using ST-2 = 41.33192 C and
vf
below:
Example of interpolation to get the v2 value:
Saturated fluid, vf (m3/kg)
0.000872
v2
Temperature (C)
40
0.0008786
42
41.33192
v 20.000872
41.3319240
=
4240
0.00087860.000872
0.000876395 m3 /kg
To find mass flow rate of the refrigerant R-134:
mref =
v ref
v2
16
7.04261 10
/ 0.000876395
= 0.008035877 kg / s.
To find rate of heat Q evap:
Qevap =
mref (h4-h3)
= 0.008035877(420-255)
= 1.325919786 W
The coefficient of performance can be calculated by using formula below:
COPref = Qevap / (SW-1/1000)
= 1.325919786 / (464.5317/1000)
= 2.854314972
Experiment b :Volume flow rate of the refrigerant, vref can be calculate by converting the unit from the
value of SC-1 (L/h) as shown below:
When SC-1 = 25.85404 L/h,
Thus,
vref = 25.85404 x
1 hr
1 m3
x
3600 s 1000 L
= 7.18168 10
m3 / s.
The specific volume of the working fluid which is condensate water, v 2 is taken by
referring to the Table A-11 for saturated refrigerant-134a by using ST-2 = 41.91636 C
and referring to the saturated fluid, vf. The interpolation method is shown below:
Example of interpolation to get the v2 value:
17
Temperature(C)
40
0.0008720
41.91636
v2
42
0.0008786
41.9163640
4240
v 20.0008720
= 0.00087860.0008720
V2 = 0.000878324 m3 / kg
To find mass flow rate of the refrigeration of the working fluid:
mref = vref / v2
= (7.18168 x 10-6 / 0.000878324)
= 0.00817657 kg / s.
To find rate of heat Q evap:
Qevap =
mref (h4-h3)
= 0.00817657 (425-260)
= 1.349134089 W.
The average coefficient of performance can be calculated by using formula below:
COPref = Qevap / (SW-1/1000)
= 1.349134089 / (467.9009/1000)
= 2.883375708
*The value for enthalpy (h), for both experiment (a) and (b), is taken from the graph figure
4.1.2. Enthalpic diagram of the refrigerant R-134a. The graph can be referred from appendix
and the value of h in table 2.
18
7.0 DISCUSSION
One of our discussions will cover what is the effect on the coefficient of performance
(COPref) as the evaporator heat load is increased. As our tabulated result, we can find that the
COPref will increasing when the pressure also being increases. First, the formula to calculate
COPref is equal to Qevap / (SW-1/1000). Therefore, to get SW-1 is influence by the pressure. If
low pressure are applied toward the experiment, so that value of SW-1 will be small and
when Qevap as nominator divided by small denominator can produce larger COPref..
Next of our discussions is the effect of cooling medium on the average refrigeration
COP. From the experiment, we experience of fully water cooling system and also fully air
cooling system. The tabulated data shows that the fully water cooling system carry out
COPaverage is almost same with fully air cooling system at same evaporator heat load. At 50%
fan power evaporator, COPwater = 2.766096; COPair = 2.881899 and at 100% fan power
evaporator, COPwater = 2.979344; COPair = 3.023245. Theoretically, the value of COP water must
more high than COPair. This is because water is more efficient compare to air for cooling
system. In the experiment, at 50% fan power evaporator, Q evap carry out from air is higher if
we compare with Qevap carry out from water as a medium (Q evap,air = 1.36496 ; Qevap,water =
1.292414) while at 100% fan power evaporator Qevap carry out from water is higher than Qevap
carry out from air (Qevap,air = 1.472518 ; Qevap,water = 1.436791).
There also another factor that can influence the outcome of COP average. The volume
flow rate at 50% fan power evaporator for water shows data of 7.06234 x 10 -6 m3/s while
volume flow rate for air is 7.33272 x 10-6 m3/s and at 100% fan power evaporator for water
shows data of 7.68903 x 10-6 m3/s while volume flow rate for air is 7.94773 x 10-6 m3/s so that
we can say that the low volume flow rate will increase the COPaverage .
What we can understand about the term of load in refrigerant after go through the
experiment procedure, we can sure the load is more focused to heat load. Even the main
19
refrigerant function in absorb and remove the heat from one medium to another medium. For
example domestic fridge is to maintain the temperature in chill condition continuously if that
fridge we still use. Therefore, the temperature in fridge will be maintained to keep the food or
even making ice tube. Other side of actual loads in refrigeration practice in a room which is
air cond, is more to control the temperature to comfort level. So the heat load also present in
this practice. In factory also need a suitable temperature to optimize the machinery operation.
8.0 CONCLUSION
Therefore, we can conclude that this experiment expose us more detail of refrigeration
system, where we can know on how COP effect if the pressure are increases. Besides that we
can learn and know the effect of cooling medium on the average refrigerant COP. Lastly we
exactly know what type of load are present in this system.
From the refrigeration laboratory, the pressure, enthalpy, and temperature were
calculated at the four state points of the vapour compression refrigeration cycle (VCRC).
With the state point properties and the power drawn by the compressor the COP can be
determined. However the COP can be determined from the work input to the compressor, or
as the work applied to the working fluid.
In comparison with the ideal VCRC, data obtained and calculated from the laboratory
(actual results) differed from those of the ideal cycle. The differences are a result of the
assumptions made when working with the ideal cycle to simplify the calculations. The
assumption that the compressor is isentropic shows the greatest impact on the variation of the
ideal and the actual cycle.
A relevant source of error involves the accuracy of the measuring equipment and of
the methods used in obtaining the measured values.
approximate that of the ideal cycle if the assumptions could be reached, such as constant
pressure heat transfer across heat exchangers, and the reduction of heat transfer to and from
the environment due to insinuated devices.
20
9.0 REFERENCES
1. Coefficient of Performance,
http://www.industrialheatpumps.nl/en/how_it_works/cop_heat_pump/ (retrieved on
October 23rd, 2014)
2. Basic Refrigeration Cycle,
https://www.swtc.edu/ag_power/air_conditioning/lecture/basic_cycle.htm (Retrieved
on October 23rd, 2014)
3. Refrigeration Cycle, http://www.air-conditioning-and-refrigerationguide.com/refrigeration-cycle.html (Retrieved on October 24th, 2014)
4. Thermodynamic Analysis,
http://www.academia.edu/1396534/THERMODYNAMIC_ANALYSIS_OF_R134A_
DMAC_VAPOR_ABSORPTION_REFRIGERATION_VAR_SYSTEM (Retrieved on
October 24th, 2014)
5. How Refrigerators Work, http://home.howstuffworks.com/refrigerator4.htm
(Retrieved on October 26th, 2014)