LRFD Manual Update2007

LRFD Bridge
Design Manual
B R I D G E
O F F I C E
5-392
MANUAL
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Bridge Office
LRFD Bridge
Design Manual
Mn/DOT BRIDGE OFFICE
LRFD Bridge Design Manual
Minnesota Department of Transportation

3485 Hadley Avenue North Mail Stop 610
Oakdale, MN 55128-3307
Phone: 651/747-2100 Fax: 651/747-2108
JULY 2003
OCTOBER 2003
JANUARY 2004
APRIL 2004
OCTOBER 2004
DECEMBER 2004
FEBRUARY 2005
MARCH 2005
NOVEMBER 2005
MARCH 2006
APRIL 2006
MAY 2006
AUGUST 2006
OCTOBER 2006
FEBRUARY 2007
ii
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.
INTRODUCTION..................................................................................... 1-1
1.1
1.2
1.3
2.
Overview Of Manual 5-392 ............................................................... 1-1

1.1.1
Material Contained in Manual 5-392 .......................................... 1-1
1.1.2
Updates to Manual 5-392 ........................................................ 1-2
1.1.3
Format of Manual References................................................... 1-2
General Bridge Information .............................................................. 1-2

1.2.1
Bridge Office ......................................................................... 1-3
1.2.2
Highway Systems................................................................... 1-8
1.2.3
Bridge Numbers ..................................................................... 1-8
1.2.4
Limit States to Consider in Design .......................................... 1-11
Procedures................................................................................... 1-11
1.3.1
Checking of Mn/DOT Prepared Bridge Plans ............................. 1-11
1.3.2
Checking of Consultant Prepared Bridge Plans .......................... 1-12
1.3.3
Schedule for Processing Construction Lettings .......................... 1-16
1.3.4
Bridge Project Tracking System.............................................. 1-17
1.3.5
Approval Process for Standards .............................................. 1-21
GENERAL DESIGN AND LOCATION FEATURES........................................ 2-1

2.1
Geometrics .................................................................................... 2-1

2.1.1
Bridge Geometrics.................................................................. 2-1
2.1.2
Bridge Deck Requirements ...................................................... 2-2
2.1.3
Bridge Undercrossing Geometrics ............................................. 2-7
2.1.4
Geometric Details ................................................................ 2-15
2.1.5
Bridge Railings .................................................................... 2-28
2.2
Bridge Aesthetics .......................................................................... 2-28
2.3
Preliminary Bridge Plans ................................................................ 2-28

2.3.1
General .............................................................................. 2-28
2.3.2
Bridge Type Selection ........................................................... 2-38
FEBRUARY 2007
2.4
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Final Bridge Plans and Special Provisions .......................................... 2-43

2.4.1
Final Design Instructions ....................................................... 2-44
2.4.1.1
Superstructure ................................................................ 2-45
2.4.1.1.1
Framing Plan ..................................................... 2-45
2.4.1.1.2
Concrete Wearing Course .................................... 2-46
2.4.1.1.3
Diaphragms and Cross Frames ............................. 2-46
2.4.1.2
Pedestrian Bridges ........................................................... 2-47
2.4.1.3
Temporary Bridges and Widenings ..................................... 2-49
2.4.1.4
Bridge Approaches........................................................... 2-50
2.4.1.5
Survey ........................................................................... 2-50
2.4.1.6
Utilities .......................................................................... 2-50
2.4.1.7
Precedence of Construction Documents............................... 2-52
2.4.1.8
Design Calculation Requirements ....................................... 2-52
2.4.2
Final Plans .......................................................................... 2-52
2.4.2.1
Drafting Standards .......................................................... 2-53
2.4.2.2
Drafting Guidelines .......................................................... 2-53
2.4.2.3
General Plan and Elevation ............................................... 2-56
2.4.2.4
Bridge Layout and Staking Plan ......................................... 2-61
2.4.2.5
Standard Abbreviations .................................................... 2-64
2.4.2.6
Inclusion of Standard Bridge Details in Plan Sets.................. 2-64
2.4.2.7
Use of Bridge Standard Plans ............................................ 2-64
2.4.2.8
Standard Plan Notes ........................................................ 2-64
2.4.2.9
Quantity Notes and Pay Items ........................................... 2-65
2.4.3
2.5
ii
Revised Sheets .................................................................... 2-66
Reconstruction Guidelines and Details .............................................. 2-67

2.5.1
Superstructure .................................................................... 2-67
2.5.1.1
Railings .......................................................................... 2-67
2.5.1.2
Wearing Course............................................................... 2-69
2.5.1.3
Expansion/Fixed Joints ..................................................... 2-69
2.5.2
Substructure ....................................................................... 2-81
2.5.2.1
Abutments...................................................................... 2-81
2.5.2.2
Piers .............................................................................. 2-81
2.5.3
Pavement ........................................................................... 2-81
FEBRUARY 2007
2.6
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
iii
Construction Requirements............................................................. 2-87
APPENDIX 2-A: BRIDGE TYPE NUMBERS .................................................. 2-88

APPENDIX 2-B: SPECIAL PROVISIONS 2005 SPEC. BOOK ........................ 2-89
APPENDIX 2-C: STANDARD ABBREVIATIONS ............................................ 2-92
APPENDIX 2-D: BRIDGE DETAILS PART I (B-DETAILS) ............................... 2-95
APPENDIX 2-E: BRIDGE DETAILS PART II (STANDARD FIGURES)................. 2-97
APPENDIX 2-F: BRIDGE STANDARD PLANS: CULVERTS .............................. 2-99
APPENDIX 2-G: MN/DOT STANDARD PLANS: SPECIAL STRUCTURES .......... 2-100
APPENDIX 2-H: STANDARD PLAN NOTES................................................ 2-101
APPENDIX 2-I: STANDARD SUMMARY OF QUANTITIES NOTES................... 2-110
APPENDIX 2-J: BRIDGE PAY ITEMS........................................................ 2-112
APPENDIX 2-K: CONVERSION FROM INCHES TO DECIMALS OF A FOOT ...... 2-116
3.
LOAD AND LOAD FACTORS .................................................................... 3-1

3.1
Load Factors and Combinations......................................................... 3-1
3.2
Load Modifiers ................................................................................ 3-3
3.3
Permanent Loads (Dead and Earth) ................................................... 3-4
3.4
Live Loads ..................................................................................... 3-4

3.4.1
HL-93 Live Load, LL................................................................ 3-5
3.4.2
Multiple Presence Factor, MPF .................................................. 3-5
3.4.3
Dynamic Load Allowance, IM ................................................... 3-5
3.4.4
Pedestrian Live Load, PL ......................................................... 3-5
3.4.5
Braking Force, BR .................................................................. 3-5
3.4.6
Centrifugal Force, CE .............................................................. 3-6
3.4.7
Live Load Application to Buried Structures ................................. 3-6
3.4.8
Live Load Surcharge, LS.......................................................... 3-6
3.5
Water Loads, WA ............................................................................ 3-6
3.6
Wind Loads, WS.............................................................................. 3-7
3.7
Wind on Live Load, WL .................................................................... 3-7
3.8
Earthquake Effects, EQ .................................................................... 3-7
3.9
Ice Load, IC ................................................................................... 3-8
3.10
Earth Pressure, EV, EH, or ES ........................................................... 3-8
3.11
Temperature, Shrinkage, Creep, Settlement, TU, SH, CR, SE ................ 3-8
OCTOBER 2006
Temperature Effects ............................................................... 3-8
3.11.2
Shrinkage Effects ................................................................. 3-11
3.12
Pile Downdrag, DD ........................................................................ 3-11
3.13
Friction Forces, FR ........................................................................ 3-11
3.13.1
Sliding Bearings ................................................................... 3-11
3.13.2
Soil/Backwall Interface and Soil/Footing Interface .................... 3-11
Extreme Event.............................................................................. 3-12
3.14.1
Vehicle Collision, CT ............................................................. 3-12
3.14.2
Vessel Collision, CV .............................................................. 3-12
3.15
Uplift........................................................................................... 3-12
3.15.1
Deck Pours.......................................................................... 3-13
3.16
Construction Loads........................................................................ 3-13
3.17
Deflections................................................................................... 3-13
STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION ........................................... 4-1

4.1
Computer Programs ........................................................................ 4-1
4.2
Load Distribution ............................................................................ 4-2

4.2.1
Dead Load Distribution ........................................................... 4-2
4.2.2
Live Load Distribution ............................................................. 4-2
4.2.2.1
Steel and Prestressed Concrete Beams ................................. 4-3
4.2.2.2
Slab Spans and Timber Decks ............................................. 4-3
4.2.3
5.
iv
3.11.1
3.14
4.
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Sidewalk Pedestrian Live Load ................................................. 4-3
4.3
Load Rating.................................................................................... 4-4
4.4
Substructure Fixity .......................................................................... 4-7
4.5
Structural Models ............................................................................ 4-7
4.6
LRFD Exceptions ............................................................................. 4-7

4.6.1
Pedestrian Bridges ................................................................. 4-8
4.6.2
Rehabilitation Projects ............................................................ 4-8
4.6.3
Railroad Bridges and Bridges or Structures near Railroads ........... 4-8
CONCRETE STRUCTURES ....................................................................... 5-1

5.1
Materials ....................................................................................... 5-1

5.1.1
Concrete............................................................................... 5-1
OCTOBER 2004
5.2
5.3
5.4
5.5
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5.1.2
Reinforcing Steel.................................................................... 5-4
5.1.3
Reinforcement Bar Couplers .................................................... 5-4
5.1.4
Prestressing Steel .................................................................. 5-4
5.1.5
Post-tensioning Hardware ....................................................... 5-5
Reinforcement Details...................................................................... 5-5

5.2.1
Minimum Clear Cover and Clear Spacing ................................... 5-5
5.2.2
Reinforcing Bar Lists............................................................... 5-7
5.2.3
General Reinforcement Practices ............................................ 5-14
5.2.4
Reinforcement Bar Couplers .................................................. 5-14
5.2.5
Adhesive Anchors................................................................. 5-14
5.2.6
Shrinkage and Temperature Reinforcement ............................. 5-15
Concrete Slabs ............................................................................. 5-17

5.3.1
Geometry ........................................................................... 5-17
5.3.2
Design/Analysis ................................................................... 5-17
5.3.3
Exterior Strip....................................................................... 5-18
5.3.4
Reinforcement Layout........................................................... 5-18
5.3.5
Camber and Deflections ........................................................ 5-21
Pretensioned Concrete ................................................................... 5-21

5.4.1
Geometry ........................................................................... 5-22
5.4.2
Stress Limits ....................................................................... 5-24
5.4.3
Design/Analysis ................................................................... 5-24
5.4.4
Detailing/Reinforcement........................................................ 5-27
5.4.5
Camber and Deflection ......................................................... 5-27
5.4.6
Standard I-Beams ................................................................ 5-28
5.4.7
Rectangular Beams .............................................................. 5-28
5.4.8
Double-Tee Beams ............................................................... 5-31
Post-Tensioned Concrete................................................................ 5-36

5.5.1
PT Slab Bridges ................................................................... 5-36
5.5.2
PT I-Girders ........................................................................ 5-36
5.5.3
PT Precast or Cast-In-Place Box Girders .................................. 5-36
5.6
Concrete Finishes and Coatings ....................................................... 5-36
5.7
Design Examples .......................................................................... 5-37

5.7.1
Three-Span Haunched Reinforced Concrete Slab....................... 5-39
OCTOBER 2004
6.
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
vi
5.7.2
Prestressed I-Beam Design Example ....................................... 5-71
5.7.3
Three-Span Haunched Post-Tensioned Concrete Slab

Design Example ................................................................. 5-101
STEEL STRUCTURES............................................................................... 6-1

6.1
Materials ....................................................................................... 6-1
6.2
General Dimensions And Details........................................................ 6-3
6.3
General Design Philosophy ............................................................... 6-7

6.3.1
Shear Connectors .................................................................. 6-9
6.3.2
Fatigue ................................................................................. 6-9
6.3.3
Deflections ............................................................................ 6-9
6.3.4
Camber .............................................................................. 6-10
6.4
Rolled Beams ............................................................................... 6-13
6.5
Plate Girders ................................................................................ 6-13

6.5.1
High Performance Steel Girders.............................................. 6-14
6.6
Curved Girders ............................................................................. 6-14
6.7
Box Or Tub Girders ....................................................................... 6-15
6.8
Bolted Connections And Splices....................................................... 6-15
6.9
Two-Span Plate Girder Design Example ............................................ 6-16
7.
RESERVED
8.
WOOD STRUCTURES .............................................................................. 8-1

8.1
8.2
Materials ....................................................................................... 8-1

8.1.1
Wood Products ...................................................................... 8-1
8.1.2
Fasteners And Hardware ......................................................... 8-2
8.1.3
Wood Preservatives ................................................................ 8-2
Timber Bridge Decks ....................................................................... 8-3

8.2.1
General ................................................................................ 8-3
8.2.2
Geometry ............................................................................. 8-5
8.2.3
Design/Analysis ..................................................................... 8-5
8.2.4
Detailing ............................................................................... 8-6
8.2.5
Camber/Deflections ................................................................ 8-6
DECEMBER 2004
8.3
9.
vii
Timber Pile Caps ............................................................................. 8-6

8.3.1
Geometry ............................................................................. 8-7
8.3.2
Design/Analysis ..................................................................... 8-7
8.3.3
Detailing ............................................................................... 8-7
8.3.4
Camber/Deflections ................................................................ 8-7
8.4
Additional References ...................................................................... 8-7
8.5
Design Examples ............................................................................ 8-8

8.5.1
Longitudinally Laminated Timber Deck Design Example ............... 8-8
8.5.2
Design Example: Timber Pile Cap ........................................... 8-26
DECKS AND DECK SYSTEMS................................................................... 9-1

9.1
General ......................................................................................... 9-1

9.1.1
9.2
Deck Drainage ....................................................................... 9-2
Concrete Deck on Beams ................................................................. 9-2

9.2.1
9.3
10.
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Deck Design and Detailing....................................................... 9-4
Reinforced Concrete Deck Design Example ....................................... 9-17
FOUNDATIONS .................................................................................... 10-1

10.1
Determination of Foundation Type and Capacity ................................ 10-1
10.1.1
Foundation Report................................................................ 10-1
10.1.2
Foundation Recommendations ............................................... 10-1
10.2
Piles............................................................................................ 10-3
10.3
Drilled Shafts ............................................................................... 10-5
10.4
Footings ...................................................................................... 10-8
10.4.1
General .............................................................................. 10-8
10.4.2
Footing Supported on Piling or Drilled Shafts............................ 10-9
10.4.3
Spread Footings................................................................. 10-10
10.5
Pile Bent Piers and Abutments ...................................................... 10-11
10.6
Evaluation of Existing Pile Foundations when Exposed by Scour ......... 10-11
10.7
Structure Excavation and Backfill .................................................. 10-13
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
viii
Appendix 10-A: Sample Bridge Construction Unit Recommendations

(Future Content) .......................................................... 10-14
11.
ABUTMENTS, PIERS, AND WALLS ....................................................... 11-1

11.1
Abutments ................................................................................... 11-1
11.1.1
Integral or Contraction Abutments.......................................... 11-3
11.1.2
Parapet Abutments............................................................... 11-6
11.1.2.1 Low Abutments ............................................................... 11-9

11.1.2.2 High Abutments .............................................................. 11-9
11.1.3
Wingwalls ......................................................................... 11-12
11.1.4
Approach Panels ................................................................ 11-20
11.2
Piers ......................................................................................... 11-21
11.2.1
Geometrics ....................................................................... 11-21
11.2.2
Columns ........................................................................... 11-21
11.2.3
Cap.................................................................................. 11-21
11.2.4
Crash Walls ....................................................................... 11-22
11.2.5
Design and Reinforcement................................................... 11-23
11.2.6
Miscellaneous .................................................................... 11-24
11.2.6.1 Pile Bent ...................................................................... 11-25

11.3
Retaining Walls........................................................................... 11-25
11.3.1
Cantilever Retaining Walls ................................................... 11-25
11.3.2
Counterfort Retaining Walls ................................................. 11-25
11.3.3
Anchored Walls .................................................................. 11-26
11.3.4
Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls....................................... 11-26
11.3.5
Prefabricated Modular Walls................................................. 11-28
11.3.6
Timber Noise Walls on Retaining Walls .................................. 11-28
11.3.7
Cantilevered Sheet Pile Walls ............................................... 11-28
11.3.8
Design Charts of Cantilevered Sheet Pile Soil Retention

Walls for Temporary Applications.......................................... 11-29
11.4
Design Examples ........................................................................ 11-39
11.4.1
High Parapet Abutment Design Example................................ 11-39
11.4.2
Retaining Wall Design Example ............................................ 11-71
11.4.3
Three-Column Pier Design Example ...................................... 11-93
AUGUST 2006
12.
13.
ix
BURIED STRUCTURES .......................................................................... 12-1

12.1
Geotechnical Properties ................................................................. 12-1
12.2
Box Culverts ................................................................................ 12-2
12.2.1
Precast ............................................................................... 12-2
12.2.2
Cast-In-Place ...................................................................... 12-4
12.3
Design Guidance ........................................................................... 12-4
12.4
Arch Or 3-Sided Structure Design Data ............................................ 12-6
12.5
Design Criteria for Long-Span Corrugated Steel Structures ............... 12-14
12.6
10' x 10' Precast Concrete Box Culvert Design Example.................... 12-18
RAILINGS ........................................................................................... 13-1

13.1
Materials ..................................................................................... 13-1
13.2
Design Requirements..................................................................... 13-1
13.2.1
Traffic Railing ..................................................................... 13-9
13.2.2
Pedestrian/Bicycle Railing.................................................... 13-11
13.2.3
Combination Railing ........................................................... 13-11
13.2.4
Strength of Standard Concrete Barriers ................................. 13-12
13.2.5
Protective Screening........................................................... 13-15
13.2.6
Architectural/Ornamental Railings ........................................ 13-15
13.3
14.
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Design Examples ........................................................................ 13-16
13.3.1
Type F Barrier Design Example ........................................... 13-17
13.3.2
Adhesive Anchor Design Example ......................................... 13-31
JOINTS AND BEARINGS ...................................................................... 14-1

14.1
Bridge Movements and Fixity .......................................................... 14-1
14.2
Expansion Joints .......................................................................... 14-1
14.2.1
Thermal Movements ............................................................. 14-2
14.2.2
Strip Seal Expansion Joints.................................................... 14-2
14.2.3
Modular Expansion Joints ...................................................... 14-3
14.2.4
Expansion Joint Detailing ...................................................... 14-3
14.3
Bearings ...................................................................................... 14-4
14.3.1
Loads and Movements .......................................................... 14-5
14.3.2
Bearing Details .................................................................... 14-5
AUGUST 2006
14.3.3
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Elastomeric Bearings ............................................................ 14-6
14.3.3.1 Design ........................................................................... 14-6

14.3.3.1.1
Size and Stability ............................................... 14-7
14.3.3.2 Fixed Bearings ................................................................ 14-7

14.3.3.3 Expansion Bearings.......................................................... 14-8
14.3.3.3.1
A.
Minimum Compressive Load ................................ 14-8
14.3.4
Pot Bearings........................................................................ 14-9
14.3.5
Other Types of Bearings ..................................................... 14-10
14.4
Curved Plate Design .................................................................... 14-10
14.5
Bearing Plate Design ................................................................... 14-11
14.6
Sole Plate Design (Steel Beams) ................................................... 14-12
14.7
Tables ....................................................................................... 14-12
14.8
Design Examples ........................................................................ 14-20
14.8.1
Fixed Elastomeric Bearing Design Example ............................ 14-21
14.8.2
Expansion Elastomeric Bearing Design Example...................... 14-29
MEMOS
#2005-01
#2005-02
#2005-03
#2006-01
LRFD and Bridge Load Rating Issues ...................(dated February 14, 2005)
Discontinue Use of Cast Bearing Option ..............(dated November 9, 2005)
New MN45 and MN54 PCB .................................. (dated November 10, 2005)
New MN63 PCB............................................................. (dated May 31, 2006)
MARCH 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
1-1
1.
INTRODUCTION
This section contains general information about the manual along with a
general description of the Bridge Office and its procedures.
1.1 Overview of
Manual 5-392
This manual contains Mn/DOT Bridge Office policies and procedures for
the design, evaluation, and rehabilitation of bridges. Except where
noted, the design provisions herein employ the Load and Resistance
Factor Design (LRFD) methodology set forth by AASHTO.
Mn/DOT utilizes a decimal numbering system to classify documents. The
5 before the hyphen represents a publication related to engineering this
is a test functions. The 300 series of documents is assigned to the
Bridge Office; the 90 series indicates that this is a Manual. The last
digit 2 specifies that the subject matter of the document is Design.
The original bridge design manual, numbered 5-392, provided guidance
for the design of highway structures in Minnesota in accordance with
allowable stress design methods. Subsequently, it has received periodic
updates as design methods have changed. This version of the Bridge
Design Manual contains significant changes. It presents Mn/DOTs design
practices in conformance with a new design methodology, Load and
Resistance Factor Design (LRFD), and also contains fifteen
comprehensive design examples.
Use of this manual does not relieve the design engineer of responsibility
for the design of a bridge or structural component. Although Bridge
Office policy is presented here for numerous situations, content of the
manual is not intended to be exhaustive. Therefore, use of this manual
must be tempered with sound engineering judgement.
1.1.1 Material
Contained in
Manual 5-392
After the introductory material provided in this section, the manual

contains material arranged around the following section headings. To
simplify locating material, section numbers correspond to those used in
the LRFD specifications:
1) Introduction
2) General Design and Location Features
3) Loads and Load Factors
4) Structural Analysis and Evaluation
5) Concrete Structures
6) Steel Structures
7) Reserved
8) Wood Structures
9) Decks and Deck Systems
10) Foundations
MARCH 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN

11)
12)
13)
14)
1.1.2 Updates to
Manual 5-392
1.1.3 Format of
Manual References
1-2
Abutments, Piers, and Walls

Buried Structures
Railings
Joints and Bearings
Memos
This manual will be updated multiple times each year as procedures are
updated and new information becomes available. Current files for each
section of the manual are available on the Bridge Office Web site at:
http://www.dot.state.mn.us/bridge/ .
Each section of the manual contains general information at the start of
the section. Design examples (if appropriate) are located at the end of
each section. The general content is divided into subsections that are
identified with numerical section labels in the left margin. Labels for
design example subsections are identified with alphanumeric labels in the
left hand margin. The left hand margin also contains references to LRFD
Design Specification Articles, Equations, and Tables. These references
are enclosed in square brackets.
Within the body of the text, references to other sections of this manual
are directly cited (e.g. Section 10.1).
References to the LRFD
Specifications within the main body of the text contain a prefix of: LRFD.
1.2 General Bridge

Information
A bridge is defined under Minnesota Rule 8810.8000 as a structure

having an opening measured horizontally along the center of the roadway
of ten feet or more between undercopings of abutments, between spring
line of arches, or between extreme ends of openings for multiple boxes.
Bridge also includes multiple pipes where the clear distance between
openings is less than half of the smaller contiguous opening.
In accordance with Minnesota Statute 15.06 Subd. 6, the Commissioner
of Transportation has delegated approval authority for State Preliminary
Bridge Plans, and State, County and City Final Bridge Plans to the State
Bridge Engineer. Plans for all bridge construction or reconstruction
projects located on the Trunk Highway System, and plans on County or
City highways funded fully or in part by state funds shall be approved by
the State Bridge Engineer.
MARCH 2006
1.2.1 Bridge Office
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
1-3
The Bridge Office is responsible for conducting all bridge and structural
design activities and for providing direction, advice, and services for all
bridge construction and maintenance activities.
The responsibilities
include:
Providing overall administrative and technical direction for the office.
Reviewing and approving all preliminary and final bridge plans
prepared by the office and consultants.
Representing the Department in bridge design, construction and
maintenance matters with other agencies.
The Office is under the direction of the State Bridge Engineer. It is
composed of sections and units as shown on the organizational chart
(Figure 1.2.1.1). Each of these subdivisions with their principal functions
is listed as follows:
1) Bridge Design Section
Responsible for the design, plans, and special provisions activities for
bridges, and miscellaneous transportation structures.
a) Design Unit
i) Designs and drafts bridge plans.
ii) Reviews bridge plans prepared by consulting engineers.
iii) Prepares special provisions for bridge plans.
iv) Designs and drafts plans for miscellaneous highway structures.
v) Provides technical assistance, designs, and plans for special
bridge and structural problems.
b) Bridge Standards and Research Unit
i) Provides design aids and standards for the office and for
consultants, counties, and cities.
ii) Coordinates the development and users of computer
programs with data processing systems.
iii) Supports computer users throughout the office and manages
the local area network.
iv) Provides oversight for research projects, which involve the
Bridge Office.
c) Design/Build Unit
i) Provides oversight of design/build projects.
d) LRFD Implementation
i) Maintains LRFD Bridge Design Manual.
ii) Provides support to office and consulting engineers concerning
LRFD issues.
2) Bridge Planning Section
Responsible for program, cost estimates, preliminary bridge plan
activities for Trunk Highways and review of state aid bridges.
a) Bridge Agreements and Estimates Unit
MARCH 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN

i)
1-4
Selects and negotiates with consulting engineers and

administers engineering agreements for the preparation of
bridge plans.
ii) Provides liaison between the office and the consulting
engineer retained to prepare bridge plans.
iii) Coordinates public and private utility requirements for
bridges.
iv) Prepares preliminary, comparative and final cost estimates.
v) Maintains and provides current program and plan status
records.
b) Preliminary Plans
i) Conducts preliminary studies from layouts and develops
preliminary bridge plans.
ii) Provides liaison with district and central office road design
through the design stage.
iii) Obtains required permits from other agencies for bridges.
c) State Aid Bridge Unit
i) Reviews bridge plans and special provisions for county,
township, and municipal state aid projects.
ii) Provides technical assistance to counties and municipalities,
when requested, for nonparticipating projects.
3) Bridge Construction and Maintenance Section
Responsible for bridge construction and maintenance specifications,
and bridge construction and maintenance advisory service activities to
the office and to the job site.
a) Construction and Maintenance Unit; North, Metro and South
Regions
i) Provides construction and maintenance advisory service to
bridge construction and maintenance engineers in the field.
ii) Writes bridge construction and maintenance specifications,
manuals and bulletins.
iii) Writes and maintains the file of current special provisions for
bridge construction and maintenance.
iv) Performs preliminary, periodic and final review of bridge
construction
and
maintenance
projects
and
makes
recommendations.
v) Reviews bridge plans and special provisions prior to lettings
and makes recommendations.
vi) Aids municipal and county engineers with bridge construction
and maintenance problems, upon request.
vii) Provides foundation design including selection of pile type,
length, design load, and foundation preparation.
viii) Reviews bridge improvement projects and prepares
recommendations for scope of work.
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
1-5
b) Bridge Ratings Unit

i) Makes bridge ratings and load postings analysis for existing
bridges and maintains the records.
ii) Reviews and approves special load permit requests.
c) Structural Metals Inspection Unit
i) Provides inspection services for structural metals, fabrication
and assembly to ensure conformity with plans and
specifications.
d) Fabrication Methods Unit
i) Reviews and approves structural metals shop drawings
submitted by fabricators.
ii) Provides fabrication advisory service to designers, fabricators
and field construction and maintenance personnel.
iii) Provides overhead sign design services to the Office of Traffic
Engineering, including the design of bridge-mounted sign
trusses.
e) Bridge Management Unit
i) Maintains inventory and inspection data for the 19,600
bridges in Minnesota. Works with all agencies to make certain
appropriate data is collected.
ii) Responsible for implementing bridge management systems to
provide information on bridges for maintenance, repair,
rehabilitation and replacement.
f) Bridge Inspection Unit
i) Provides expert assistance to the Districts in organizing and
conducting inspections of complex bridges, special features,
and fracture critical bridges.
ii) Conducts quality assurance inspections of all agencies
responsible for bridge inspections in Minnesota.
iii) Reviews, recommends and provides bridge inspection training
for District, county, and municipal bridge inspectors.
4) Hydraulic Engineering Section
Responsible for providing statewide hydraulic engineering services
that include design, construction and maintenance activities.
In
addition, the section provides leadership in the development and
implementation of hydraulic automation technology, establishes policy
pertaining to hydrology and hydraulics, prepares design aids, provides
client training, participates in research projects, and represents the
department on state and national committees.
a) Bridge Design Hydraulics Unit
i) Provides bridge and culvert waterway designs for trunk
highway, county, city and township projects.
ii) Analyzes and evaluates inplace bridges for scour.
MARCH 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
1-6
iii) Provides technical assistance to counties and municipalities

upon request.
iv) Provides training in hydrology and hydraulics.
b) Road Design Hydraulics Unit
i) Evaluates and codes all bridges over water for scour.
ii) Provides technical assistance to Districts on all aspects of
drainage design.
iii) Reviews and cost prorates storm drains on the municipal and
county state aid system.
iv) Coordinates the review of new products and development of
specifications and policies pertaining to their use.
c) Hydraulics Automation Unit
i) Provides leadership and technical direction for managing the
statewide hydraulic automation effort.
ii) Develops and implements the means to integrate the
hydraulic design process with the road design process.
iii) Develops, implements, and supports a hydraulic information
system to facilitate the sharing of hydraulic data among all
users and stakeholders.
iv) Provides statewide training and support in the implementation
and use of hydraulic automation techniques.
For more information, visit the
http://www.dot.state.mn.us/bridge/.
Bridge
Office
Web
site
at:
MARCH 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 1.2.1.1
Mn/DOT Bridge Office Organization Chart
1-7
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
1-8
1.2.2 Highway
Systems
Highways throughout the nation are divided into systems. These system
designations are important to know because design standards can vary
between the systems.
The various highway systems are classified
according to the Agency that has responsibility for their improvement,
maintenance and traffic regulation enforcement. Listed below are the
jurisdictional divisions in Minnesota:
1) Trunk Highway System
The Trunk Highway System consists of all highways, including the
Interstate routes, under the jurisdiction of the State of Minnesota.
These routes generally are the most important in the state, carry the
greatest traffic volumes, and operate at the highest speeds.
2) County Highway System
The County Highway System is made up of those roads established
and designated under the authority of the county board. They
generally are the more important routes within a county that are not
on the Trunk Highway System.
3) Township Road System
The Township Road System is made up of the roads established under
the authority of the town board.
They generally are of local
importance.
4) Municipal Street System
The Municipal Street System is all roads within a municipality not
designated as a trunk highway or county road. They are generally
of local importance.
1.2.3 Bridge
Numbers
All publicly owned bridges either on or over a trunk highway and over
10 feet in length measured along the centerline of the highway are
assigned a number for identification and cost accounting purposes.
The numbering scheme followed in assigning bridge numbers depends on
the time of construction. With few exceptions, the numbering procedure
is as follows:
1) Prior to about 1950, all bridges were numbered consecutively from 1
to 9999 as they were constructed. The 8000 series was used for
culverts over 10 feet in length (measured along the centerline of the
highway). The 7000 series was reserved for county bridges at trunk
highway intersections. Five-digit bridge numbers beginning with L or
R designate bridges in local bridge systems.
2) Since about 1950, a five-digit number has been assigned to each
bridge as it was constructed. The first two digits coincide with the
county number (01-87) in which the bridge is located (99 refers to
temporary bridges). The last three digits are assigned consecutively
using the following guidelines:
MARCH 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
1-9
a. 001-499 are used for regular trunk highway bridges.

b. 500-699 are used for county bridges.
c. 700-999 are used for interstate bridges (any bridge on or over the
interstate system).
3) In 1991, additional numbers were required for bridges on the state
aid system in Hennepin County and for interstate bridges in Hennepin
County. To allocate more numbers for bridges on the local system an
alpha character is used as the third character of the bridge number.
For example, the next bridge number after Bridge No. 27699 will be
Bridge No. 27A00. Note that this happens only after 500 and 600
series have been exhausted.
To allocate more numbers on the Interstate road system, the 400
series of numbers will be used along with the 700, 800, 900's
presently used. For a bridge number XXYZZ, the following now
applies:
XX = County identification number (99 = Temporary Bridge)
Y = 0, 1, 2, 3, or R, T, U (for Trunk Highway Bridges)
Y = 4, 7, 8, 9, or V, or W (for Interstate Bridges)
Y = X and Y (Trunk Highway or Interstate Culverts)
Y = 5 or 6 or A through H (for non-trunk highway Bridges)
Y = J through N, and P, Q (for non-trunk highway Culverts)
ZZ = Sequence number (00 through 99)
4) In cases of twin bridges, a westbound or southbound lane bridge is
generally assigned a lower number than an eastbound or northbound
lane bridge.
All bridge numbers are assigned by the Bridge Office. A complete listing
of all numbered bridges is available in computer printout form entitled
Minnesota Trunk Highway Bridge Log- Statewide Listing.
See
Table 1.2.3.1 for a listing of the county identification numbers.
MARCH 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
1-10
Table 1.2.3.1 Minnesota County Identification Numbers

County No.
County Name
District
County No.
01
Aitkin
1&3
45
County Name
02
Anoka
Metro
46
Martin
03
Becker
47
Meeker
04
Beltrami
48
Mille Lacs
05
Benton
49
Morrison
06
Big Stone
50
Mower
07
Blue Earth
51
Murray
08
Brown
52
Nicollet
09
Carlton
53
Nobles
10
Carver
Metro
54
Norman
11
Cass
2&3
55
Olmsted
12
Chippewa
56
Otter Tail
13
Chisago
Metro
57
Pennington
14
Clay
58
Pine
15
Clearwater
59
Pipestone
16
Cook
60
Polk
17
Cottonwood
61
Pope
Marshall
District
2
18
Crow Wing
62
Ramsey
19
Dakota
Metro
63
Red Lake
Metro
2
20
Dodge
64
Redwood
21
Douglas
65
Renville
22
Faribault
66
Rice
23
Fillmore
67
Rock
24
Freeborn
68
Roseau
25
Goodhue
69
St. Louis
26
Grant
70
Scott
27
Hennepin
Metro
71
Sherburne
28
Houston
72
Sibley
29
Hubbard
73
Stearns
3
6
1
Metro
30
Isanti
74
Steele
31
Itasca
1, 2 & 3
75
Stevens
32
Jackson
76
Swift
33
Kanabec
77
Todd
34
Kandiyohi
78
Traverse
35
Kittson
79
Wabasha
36
Koochiching
1&2
80
Wadena
37
Lac Qui Parle
81
Waseca
38
Lake
82
Washington
39
Lake of the Woods
83
Watonwan
40
Le Sueur
84
Wilkin
41
Lincoln
85
Winona
42
Lyon
86
Wright
43
McLeod
87
Yellow Medicine
44
Mahnomen
Metro
MARCH 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
1-11
1.2.4 Limit States

to Consider in
Design
Bridge designs shall typically consider Strength, Service, Extreme Event,

and Fatigue limit states. The limit state checks will vary with the
component under consideration.
Not all elements will require
consideration of all limit states. For example, the fatigue limit state need
not be considered for fully prestressed pretensioned elements.
1.3 Procedures
This section covers the Bridge Office procedures for checking of bridge
plans, scheduling of projects, and revising or creating standards.
1.3.1 Checking of
Mn/DOT Prepared
Bridge Plans
The general practice of most engineering offices is to require that designs

they produce be checked before they are reviewed and certified by the
Engineer in Responsible Charge. Although this practice has always
been required for structures designed for Mn/DOT, it is recognized that
the quality of the checking process often varies according to time
restraints, confidence in the designer, and the instructions given to the
checker. Therefore, in order to maintain a consistent design checking
process the following guidance is given for routine bridge designs.
For more complex or unusual designs, the checker is advised to discuss
additional requirements with the design unit leader. Also, the checking
process described is not meant to apply to the check or review functions
required for Mn/DOT review of consultant plans (see Section 1.3.2.) or
for construction false work reviews.
(See the Bridge Construction
Manual.)
Three types of design checking will apply:
1) An independent analysis of the completed design.
2) A check of original design computations for mathematical accuracy,
application of code, and accepted engineering practice.
3) A review of drafted details for constructibility and accepted
engineering practice.
Generally, an independent analysis to
complete design is preferred. Significant
and resolved before the plan is certified.
should be included with the design file
design check.
confirm the adequacy of the

differences should be discussed
The separate set of calculations
as a record of the completed
When circumstances prevent a complete independent analysis, as a

minimum, an independent analysis shall be completed for the following:
1) Live and dead loads
2) Critical beam lines
3) A pier cap
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
1-12
4) A pier footing
5) Main reinforcement for high abutments
6) An abutment footing
However, for the elements not independently analyzed, the original
computations should be checked for mathematical accuracy of original
design computations, applications of code, and accepted engineering
practice. Checked computations should be initialed by the checker, and
the independent analysis should be included in the design file.
When doing a separate analysis, the checker may make simplifying
assumptions to streamline the checking process. However, when major
differences are found, results must be discussed and resolved with the
designer. For instance, for normal piers, piling might be analyzed for
dead and live loads only if lateral loads appear to have been reasonably
applied in the original computations or the AISC Beam Diagram and
Formula Tables may be used to approximate pier cap moment and
shear.
Whether the check is a completely independent analysis or a minimal
analysis combined with a computations check, some details, such as the
reinforcing details in a wall corner, also require review by the checker.
Often referencing old bridge plans with similar details allows the checker
to compare the current design to details that have performed well in the
past.
1.3.2 Checking of
Consultant
Prepared Bridge
Plans
Consultant prepared bridge plans are created by private engineering

firms through contracts with the Department. The finished plans are
complete to the extent that they can be used for construction.
Since these plans receive final approval of the State Bridge Engineer,
there must be assurance that the plans are geometrically accurate and
buildable; structural design is adequate and design codes have been
correctly applied; proper direction is given to the construction contractor;
and all construction costs are accounted for. Plan errors may cause
costly construction delays or safety may be compromised by an
inadequate design.
To keep consultant plan reviews consistent and timely, a procedure was
developed as a guide that assigns priority to specific items in the plans.
The overall review includes a Thorough Check and Cursory Review of
various items. The distinction between Thorough Check and Cursory
Review is as follows:
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
1-13
Thorough Check refers to performing complete mathematical

computations in order to identify discrepancies in the plans, or
conducting careful comparisons of known data and standards of the
Project with values given in the plan.
Cursory Review refers to a comparative analysis for agreement with
standard practice and consistency with similar structures, all with
application of engineering judgment.
Mathematical analysis is not
required, but may be deemed necessary to identify the extent of a
discrepancy.
The review procedure is listed on the CONSULTANT BRIDGE PLAN
REVIEW form following this section. Headings on this list are defined as
follows:
PARTIAL PLAN: In order to assure that the consultant is proceeding in
the right direction, an early submittal of the plan is required. This
submittal usually consists of the General Plan and Elevation sheet
showing the overall geometry of the structure and the proposed beam
type and spacing; the Bridge Layout Sheet; the Framing Plan sheet; and
the Bridge Survey sheets. Errors and inconsistencies found in this phase
can be corrected before the entire plan is completed. For example, a
framing plan, including the proposed beams, must be assured as
workable on the partial plan before the consultant gets deep into the
design of the remainder of the bridge.
FINAL PLAN: A final plan should be complete in all areas to the extent
that it can be certified by the designer, although a certification signature
is not required for this phase.
THOROUGH CHECK: Items indicated for checking on the consultants
partial plan must be correct. Given geometry must fit the roadway
layout. Most of this information can be checked using data from the
approved preliminary plan. Approval of the partial plan will indicate that
Mn/DOT is satisfied with the geometry and proposed structure, and the
consultant may proceed with further development of the plan. For the
final plan, obvious drafting and numerical errors should be marked to
point out the errors to the consultant, however, the reviewer should not
provide corrections to errors in the consultants numerical computations.
Checking on the final plan should be thorough to eliminate possible errors
that may occur, such as the pay items in the Schedule of Quantities.
Plan notes and pay items can be difficult for a consultant to anticipate
because of frequent changes by Mn/DOT. Pay items must be correct
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
1-14
because these are carried throughout the entire accounting system for
the Project. Plan (P) quantities must also be correctly indicated.
CURSORY REVIEW:
Normally, a cursory review would not require
numerical calculations. This type of review can be conducted by reading
and observing the contents of the plan in order to assure the
completeness of the work.
The reviewer should be observant to
recognize what looks right and what doesnt look right. Obvious errors or
inconsistencies on any parts of the plan should be marked for correction.
Although structural design is usually the major focus of any plan, most
consultants are well versed in design procedures and should need only
minimal assistance from our office. A comparison of the consultants
calculations with the plan details should be performed to assure that the
plans reflect their design and that the applicable codes are followed. An
independent design by our office is time consuming and is not
recommended unless there is a reasonable doubt as to the adequacy of
the consultants design.
NO REVIEW: A thorough review of these items would be time-consuming
and may not produce corrections that are vital to construction; therefore,
it is recommended that little or no time be spent on the listed items.
Numerous errors can occur in the Bills of Reinforcement and quantity
values. However, checking this information is also time-consuming,
hence the burden of providing correct data should be placed on the
consultant.
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
1-15
CONSULTANT BRIDGE PLAN REVIEW

Br. No. ________ RTE ____ DATE: PARTIAL PLAN REC'D. _____ DATE FINAL PLAN REC'D. ______
DESIGN GROUP _______________________ CONSULTANT ______________________________
No. OF SHEETS IN PLAN ______ DESCRIBE COMPLEXITY_________________________________
EST. REVIEW TIME BY DESIGN GROUP ________(hrs.) ACTUAL REVIEW TIME __________(hrs)
PARTIAL PLAN
THOROUGH CHECK
FINAL PLAN
THOROUGH CHECK
Horizontal and vertical clearances
Pay items and plan quantities
Stations and elevations on survey line
Project numbers
Deck and seat elevations at working points
Design data block & Rating on GP&E sheet
Deck cross-section dimensions
Job number
Working line location and data
Certification block
Coordinates at working points and key stations
Standard plan notes
Substructure locations by station
Concrete mix numbers
Framing Plan
Construction joint locations
Conformance to preliminary plan
Prestressed beam design if inadequate design is suspected
Design loads
Bridge seat elevations at working points

Utilities on bridge
Existing major utilities near bridge
CURSORY REVIEW
Steel beam splice locations and diaphragm spacing; flange

plate thickness increments (enough to save 800+ # of
steel)
Abutment and Pier design to be checked against
consultants calculations
Conformance to foundation recommendations.
Pile loads and earth pressures. Check against consultants
calculations.
CURSORY REVIEW
Rebar series increments (min. 3")
Proposed precast beams [per 5-393.509(2)]
Interior beam seat elevations
Precast conformance to industry standards
Bottom-of-footing elevations (for adequate cover)
Proposed steel beam sections
Railing lengths and metal post spacing (check for fit)

Use of B-details and standard plan sheets
Conformance to aesthetic requirements
Notes General, construction, reference, etc.
Quantity items on tabulations
Precast beam design (Check against consultants
calculations)
NO CHECK OR REVIEW REQUIRED

Diagonals on Layout sheet
Figures in Bills of Reinforcement
Bar shapes and dimensions
Rebar placement dimensions
Bar marks on details against listed bars
Quantity values (including total of tabulations)
JULY 2003
1.3.3 Schedule for
Processing
Construction
Lettings
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
1-16
To meet the Departments schedule requirements for construction

lettings, the following schedule for processing bridge plans, special
provisions and estimates must be followed. This schedule applies to all
projects:
Federal Aid, State Funds and Maintenance.
In general,
processing of bridge plans, special provisions and estimates for lettings
shall be given priority over all other work, and every effort must be made
to complete the processing in advance of the times shown, which are
deadlines.
Deadline Time Before Letting Date
Schedule and Remarks

Bridge plans complete to the extent that
processing can be completed on schedule.
Preliminary bridge pay items and quantities
for estimate (to Estimating Unit Design
Services)
Bridge plan and special provisions review
complete (by Bridge Construction Unit)
Federal Project
State Project
14 Weeks
12 Weeks
(Friday)
(Friday)
13 Weeks
11 Weeks
(Friday)
(Friday)
13 Weeks
11 Weeks
(Friday)
(Friday)
12 Weeks
10 Weeks
(Friday)
(Friday)
12 Weeks
10 Weeks
(Friday)
(Friday)
12 Weeks
10 Weeks
(Friday)
(Friday)
during 9th week
during 8th week
81/2 weeks
7 weeks
(Tuesday)
(Friday)
Bridge special provisions complete, other

information or material for inclusion in
Roadway Special Provisions complete (to
Special Provisions & Final Processing Unit
Design Services)
Bridge plans complete, approved and dated
(to Office Management Unit)
Final bridge pay items and quantities for
estimate (to estimating Unit Design
Services)
Final computer runs for bridge estimate
Office copy and final bridge plans (Bridge
plans to Special & Final Processing Unit
Design Services for submittal to FHWA)
Federal Project to FHWA
71/2 weeks (Tuesday)
Preliminary advertisement
61/2 weeks (Tuesday)
Final advertisement
Sale of plans and proposals
Last date for mailing letter addendums by
Special Provisions & Final Processing Unit
Design Services
7 weeks
(Friday)
6 weeks
(Friday)
5 /2 weeks (Tuesday)
5 weeks (Friday)
5 weeks (Friday)
5 weeks (Friday)
10 days
10 days
(Wednesday)
(Wednesday)
MARCH 2006
1.3.4 Bridge
Project Tracking
System
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
1-17
Completing a bridge design project for contract letting is a multiple step

process that involves input from a variety of work units and personnel.
Projects are tracked by Mn/DOT using the Program and Project
Management System (PPMS). Within PPMS, projects are divided into
activities and the activities are further divided into work tasks. For
example, Activity 1260 is Preliminary Structure Plans and Work Task 2
of Activity 1260 is Draft Preliminary Bridge Plan. Progress of the work
tasks on active bridge projects is updated monthly.
Following are tables that list work tasks for the major bridge activities
within PPMS. Table 1.3.4.1 contains a listing of the PPMS work tasks for
Activity 1260, Preliminary Structure Plans. Tables 1.3.4.2 and 1.3.4.3
contain listings of the PPMS work tasks for Activity 1270, Final Structure
Plans.
For more information on activities and work tasks within PPMS, refer to
the PPMS Activity Manual located on the Mn/DOT internal web site at
http://ihub.ots/projdev/pmu/ppms/ .
Table 1.3.4.1
PPMS Work Tasks for Mn/DOT or Consultant Prepared Preliminary
Bridge Plans (Activity 1260)
Percent of
Number
Work Task
Activity
Completed
Receive and review information (grades, alignment,

1
surveys, layout, Hydraulics report, Project Design
15%
Memo., Environmental report)

2
Draft Preliminary Bridge Plan
60%
Check Preliminary Bridge Plan
75%
Prepare Aesthetics Recommendation
80%
Receive and Plot Borings
85%
6
7
8
9
Receive Foundation Recommendations from

Regional Bridge Construction Engineer
Obtain State Bridge Engineers Signature
Distribute Signed Plans & Distribute responses on
need for Signs, Lighting, TMC
88%
90%
91%
Preliminary Estimate and District Letter
95%
10
Obtain FHWA Approval
99%
11
Turn over and meet with final Design
100%
MARCH 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
1-18
Table 1.3.4.2
PPMS Work Tasks for Mn/DOT Prepared Final
Percent of
Number
Work Task
Activity
Completed *
Receive Preliminary Bridge Plan, Final Repair

Recommendation, or Special Structure Request
5%
Receive District Design Information (Signal,

Lighting, Signing, TMS, etc.)
2
Receive Utility Information
10%
Receive Stage Construction Sheets

3
Establish Geometrics
20%
Conduct Analysis and Design, Including Check
45%
Draft and Check Plan Sheets
75%
Incorporate Standard Detail Sheets

6
Construction Unit Review
80%
Figure Quantities
85%
Send Informational Copies to FHWA and District
88%
Final Check of Plan Set by Unit Leader
90%
10
Frame Special Provisions
95%
11
Final Revisions and Check of Plan Set
99%
12
Obtain State Bridge Engineers Signature
100%
* May vary by job complexity.
Table 1.3.4.3
PPMS Work Tasks for Consultant Prepared Final
Percent of
Number
Work Task
Activity
Completed
Consultant kick-off meeting
25%
Partial Plan Delivery and Review
45%
Final Plan Delivery and Review
85%
Submit for Signature
100%
MARCH 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
1-19
A listing of the work type codes used in PPMS is given in Table 1.3.4.4.
Table 1.3.4.4
PPMS Bridge Work Type Codes
Work Type
Description
01
New Bridge
1A
New Bridge (Phase 1) (Early Steel or Stage Construction)
1B
New Bridge (Phase 2)
02
Culvert
2X
Culvert Extension
2B
Concrete Arch
03
Temporary Bridge
04
Pedestrian Bridge
05
Renovation
06
Widen w/Substructure Work
6A
Widen w/Substructure Work (Phase 1) (Early Steel or Stage
6B
Widen with Substructure Work (Phase 2)
6T
Temporary Widening
07
Widen without Substructure Work
08
Bridge Length/Short
09
Replace Deck
10
Deck Overlay
11
Replace Railing or Median Barrier
12
Bridge Painting
13
Substructure Repair
14
Remove Bridge
15
Miscellaneous
16
Raise Bridge
17
Replace Superstructure - No Preliminary Plan Req'd
18
Repair Railing or Median Barrier
19
Replace Joints
23
Widen without Substructure Work & Replace Deck
24
Widen without Substructure Work & Deck Overlay
25
Widen without Substructure Work, Deck Overlay & Paint
26
Widen without Substructure Work & Other Minor Work
27
Widen without Substructure Work & Paint
28
Replace Deck & Paint
29
Replace Deck & Other Minor Work
31
Deck Overlay & Replace Railing or Median Barrier
32
Deck Overlay, Replace Railing or Median Barrier & Paint
33
Deck Overlay & Other Minor Work
MARCH 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
1-20
Table 1.3.4.4
PPMS Bridge Work Type Codes (Continued)
Work Type
35
Description
Deck Overlay & Paint
37
Replace Railing or Median Barrier & Paint
38
Replace Railing or Median Barrier & Other Minor Work
39
Paint & Other Minor Work
40
Repair Railing or Median Barrier & Replace Joints
41
Widen without Substructure Work, Replace Deck & Paint
42
Replace Railing or Median Barrier & Replace Joints
44
Deck Repair & Replace Joints
45
Deck Overlay & Repair Railing or Median Barrier
46
Deck Overlay, Repair Railing or Median Barrier & Replace Joints
47
Deck Repair - Rail Rehab
48
Minor Work (Deck Repair, Paint, & Repair Railing or Median Barrier)
49
Deck Overlay, Paint & Repair Railing or Median Barrier
50
Retaining Wall
51
Parking Garage
52
Repair Concrete Arch
54
Riprap
58
Paint & Replace Joints
60
Widen with Substructure Work & Replace Deck
61
Widen with Substructure Work & Deck Overlay
62
Widen with Substructure Work, Deck Overlay & Paint
63
Widen with Substructure Work & Paint
64
Widen with Substructure Work, Replace Deck & Paint
66
Widen with Substructure Work & Replace Superstructure
68
Widen with Substructure Work & Replace Railing or Median Barrier
69
Miscellaneous Major
71
Deck Overlay & Replace Joints
91
Probably Bridge
92
Probably Culvert
98
Bridge Scoping
99
Bridge Study
MARCH 2006
1.3.5 Approval
Process for
Standards
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
1-21
FLOW CHART
FOR
REVISING BRIDGE STANDARDS
(Includes B-Details and Standards)
Request For New Standards
Or Revising Existing Standards
Bridge Standards Unit
Minor
Modific ation
To Existing
Standards
Yes
No
Solic it/Rec eive Com ments
Input from:
R & D Comm.
SSRC Comm
Other Bridge Offic e Engr./Staff
Other Mn/DOT Personnel
Consultants
Industry
Cities/Counties
FHWA
New Standard Created,

Existing Standards Revised
Show New
Revision
Date
Review By SSRC
Review By R & D
Modific ations
Needed?
Yes
No
Does
Revision
Affec t Others
Outside Of Bridge
Offic e?
Yes
No
Standard Signed By
State Bridge Engineer
Transmittal Mem o
To Manual Users
Publish On Web Site

BR3810.CDR
Make
Change
Yellow
Routing
Proc ess
FEBRUARY 2007
2. GENERAL
DESIGN AND
LOCATION
FEATURES
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
2-1
The design of a bridge typically takes place in two major phases of work:
preliminary design and final design. During preliminary design, the
structure type, the foundation type, the aesthetics, and the primary
geometry for the bridge are determined. During final design, specific
details for all of the elements of the bridge are developed and presented
in the plan set. These details include material descriptions, quantities,
and geometric information. Final plan sets are typically assembled in an
order that roughly follows the order of construction: from the ground up.
This section of the manual contains a large amount of information useful
for the preparation and assembly of plans for a project. To facilitate the
production of plans and standardize the content of bridge plan sets,
special provisions, B-Details, standard plans, standard plan notes, and
standard pay items have been prepared by the Bridge Office. Appendices
to Section 2 identify the material available.
As the name of the section implies, content for this section is general in
nature. Guidance for the design of specific structural elements (e.g.
decks, retaining walls, etc.) is provided elsewhere in the manual.
2.1 Geometrics
2.1.1 Bridge
Geometrics
Definitions
For discussion of bridge geometrics in this section, roadways are
classified as Mainline Highways, Ramps, Local Roads, and Local Streets.
Each of these four groups is further classified under either Urban or Rural
Design.
The following definitions apply:
Mainline Highways Roadways that carry through traffic lanes for
freeways, expressways, and primary and secondary highways.
Local Roads Rural roads off the trunk highway system.
Local Streets Urban roads off the state trunk highway system.
Ramps Segments of roadway connecting two or more legs at an
interchange.
Urban Design Roadways with curbs on the right and/or left sides.
Rural Design Roadways without curbs.
Median Width The distance between the edges of opposing through
traffic lanes.
Auxiliary Lane A lane adjoining a through traffic lane for a purpose
supplementary to through traffic movement such as truck climbing,
weaving, speed change or turning.
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
2-2
General Criteria
The width of the bridge deck and the typical section at the bridge
undercrossing are determined by the classification and geometrics of the
approaching roadway. The geometrics of the approaching roadway are to
be carried over and under the bridge to the maximum extent practicable.
Rural design is considered the desirable design and will be used in all
rural areas and in urban areas where sufficient right of way is available or
can be obtained. Urban design geometrics (curbed roadways) are slightly
more restrictive and are therefore used at locations where extensive
right-of-way cost or other unusual conditions are controlling factors.
The discussion of geometric details included in this section describes
bridge deck geometrics separately from bridge undercrossing geometrics.
For side clearances at certain undercrossing situations, both a desirable
and a minimum section are shown. Incorporation of the desirable
section at undercrossings is mandatory unless approved by the
Preliminary Bridge Plans Engineer.
Application of Standards
The geometrics shown apply specifically to new work. However, use of
these geometrics is also highly desirable when upgrading or widening
existing facilities and should be incorporated in these situations. Bridge
deck geometrics on the local road system must also comply with
State-Aid for Local Transportation Operations Rules, Chapter 8820.
Responsibility
The Preliminary Bridge Plans Engineer will be responsible for assuring
that the geometric standards in this section are followed. Where a
deviation from the standard is necessary, a written description of the
deviation shall be prepared by the Preliminary Bridge Plans Engineer and
submitted to the State Bridge Engineer when submitting the Preliminary
Bridge Plan for acceptance.
2.1.2 Bridge Deck

Requirements
Bridge Width Criteria

Roadway cross sections that approach bridges will normally provide a
clear zone recovery area beside the travel lane for the benefit of out-ofcontrol vehicles. It is not economical or practical to carry these full clear
zone widths across bridges. Standard widths for bridge shoulders have
been set to balance costs and safety. Since the railing is located within
the clear zone it is considered a hazard and guardrail protection is
required in the approach area.
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
2-3
Functions of the shoulder include:

Recovery area to regain control of a vehicle.
Emergency parking area for stalled vehicles and escape route for
stranded motorists.
Passageway for bicycles and occasional pedestrians.
Passageway for emergency vehicles.
Parking area for bridge maintenance and inspection vehicle (snooper).
Temporary traffic lane during deck repairs or overlay construction.
Area for deck drainage and snow storage.
Accommodates passing of wide oversize loads, especially farm
machinery.
On two-lane highways, the shoulders provide an escape area to avoid
a head-on collision with an oncoming passing vehicle.
The following shoulder widths for both rural and urban design apply to
trunk highway bridges. In addition, these standards apply to bridges on
local roads at a trunk highway freeway interchange. For local roads and
streets, the bridge roadway widths are given in the State Aid Manual,
Section 5-892.210 and the State Aid Operations Rules, Chapter 8820.
Exceptionally long bridges or bridges with a high cost per square foot
should be evaluated on an individual basis and modifications to these
standards are allowed based on judgment. In addition to these values,
the bridge roadway width shall meet the additional requirements for sight
distance and sharp curvature as specified in Part 4 below.
1) Rural Design
a) Two-Lane Rural Design
Shoulder widths are given in the table on Figure 2.1.4.1 and are
dependent on the functional classification of the roadway and
traffic volumes.
b) Four-Lane Rural Design
i) Right Shoulder 12'-0"
ii) Left Shoulder 6'-0"
c) Six- or Eight-Lane Rural Divided Highway
The full inside shoulder allows disabled vehicles in the left lane
to stop on the inside shoulder rather than try to cross two or
three lanes of traffic to get to the outside shoulder.
d) Mainline Rural Bridge with Auxiliary Lane
e) Mainline Rural Bridge with Entrance or Exit Ramps
f) Rural Bridges with Turn Lanes
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
2-4
i)
Right Turn Lane

(1) Right shoulder 6'-0"
ii) Left Turn Lanes
(1) Adjacent to a barrier railing: 4'-0" minimum shoulder, 6'-0"
desirable.
g) Rural Ramp Bridges (one 16'-0" lane, one-way)
On ramp bridges the dimension from edge of lane to gutter is
reduced to prevent the appearance of a two-lane bridge on a
one-lane ramp. The roadway width is 26'-0", which allows
traffic to pass a stalled vehicle. With a 16'-0" lane the outside
2'-0" could, in effect, be considered as part of the shoulder for
a 12'-0" lane.
2) Urban Design (Approach Curbs)
For urban designs the bridge gutter lines shall be aligned with the
curb line on the approaching roadway with the following exceptions:
a) On four-lane divided highways where there are no median curbs,
the left shoulder shall be 6'-0".
b) On six- and eight-lane divided highways where there are no
median curbs, the left shoulder shall be 10'-0" minimum.
c) On one-lane urban ramps (16'-0" approach roadway), both right
and left shoulders shall be 4'-0" (provides a 24'-0" roadway).
d) Where an auxiliary lane, ramp, or taper extends onto a mainline
bridge, the right shoulder shall be 6'-0".
e) The minimum distance to a barrier railing is 6'-0" desired, 4'-0"
minimum.
Urban shoulder widths will vary according to functional class, traffic
volumes, scope of work, and quality of pavement surface. Typical
values are shown in the Road Design Manual, Tables 4-4.01A,
4-4.01B, and 4-4.01C. Provide a 2'-0" reaction distance to a raised
island type median or sidewalk curb where vehicle speeds are 40 mph
and under. For design speeds 45 mph and higher, provide a 4'-0"
reaction distance.
3) Bus Shoulders
Where the right shoulder has been designated as a bus shoulder a
12'-0" width shall be provided across bridges. See Road Design
Manual 4-4.03 and Table 4-4.03A.
4) Additional Width Criteria
a) Where a ramp (loop) bridge is on a radius of 190'-0" or less, or
when the volume of trucks is 10% or greater, the effective traffic
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
2-5
lane is increased from 16'-0" to 18'-0" in width to accommodate

truck turning movements. Increase the width of the ramp bridge
accordingly.
b) For curved bridges longer than 100 feet, check the horizontal
stopping sight distance and increase the inside shoulder width up
to a maximum of 10'-0". See Road Design Manual, Chapter 3 for
calculation of this distance. The 2001 edition of the AASHTO
book, A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets,
changed the height of object from 6" (muffler) to 2'-0" (tail light).
Table 2.1.2.1 gives widths required for a continuously curving
bridge for various design speeds and curvature, and applies only
where the line of sight is blocked by the railing.
Table 2.1.2.1
Shoulder Width Requirements for Curved Bridges
DESIGN
SPEED
SHOULDER WIDTH FOR DEGREE OF

CURVATURE LISTED
6 FT.
8 FT.
10 FT.
70 mph
to 0o 45
> 0o 45 to 1o
> 1o
60 mph
to 1o 15
> 1o 15 to 2o
> 2o
50 mph
to 2o 30
> 2o 30 to 3o 15
> 3o 15
40 mph
to 5o 30
> 5o 30 to 7o
> 7o
c) For bridges on tapers, the taper should begin or end at a pier or

an abutment, or continue across the entire length of the bridge.
Extra width to eliminate or simplify a taper or curvature is
permissible where justified by simplified design and construction.
Cross Slopes on Bridges
1) The cross slope on bridge traffic lanes is the same as the approaching
roadway lanes, normally 0.02 ft./ft. The shoulder cross slope on the
bridge may continue at 0.02 ft./ft. or, if better drainage is desired,
may be 0.005 ft./ft. greater than the adjacent lane, with a maximum
cross slope of 0.04 ft./ft. When the bridge deck is superelevated, the
shoulders shall have the same slopes as the adjacent bridge traffic
lanes.
Keep superelevation transitions off bridges. In instances where they
are unavoidable, it is preferable for ease of deck pouring to maintain
a straight line across the deck at all locations (allows a straight screed
between paving rails placed at both sides of the deck.)
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
2-6
2) Ramp cross slopes shall be uniform between the bridge curbs with a
slope of 0.02 ft./ft. to the right unless superelevated.
Bridge Median
On divided highways with a separate bridge for each roadway, the
openings between bridges must be a minimum of 8'-0" wide if access for
bridge inspection vehicles (snoopers) is required.
Longitudinal joints along the median of bridges should be used only for
bridge roadways wider than about 100 feet or for other special cases. By
eliminating this joint on bridges with medians, simpler detailing and
simpler construction can be used.
Bridge Sidewalks and Bikeways
Bridge sidewalks of 6'-0" minimum widths are to be provided where
justified by pedestrian traffic. When bicycle traffic is expected, the width
should be 8'-0" minimum and 10'-0" desirable. Where an off road
bikeway is to be carried across a bridge, the full width of the approach
bikeway may be continued across the bridge up to a width of 12'-0",
which is considered the practical maximum width for a bikeway on a
bridge. When the shoulders of the bikeway cannot be carried over
bridges, provide lead-in guardrail.
The curb height for sidewalks adjacent to the roadway is 8". When the
design speed on the street is over 40 mph, a concrete barrier is required
between the roadway and the sidewalk (or bikeway). In addition, a
pedestrian (or bikeway) railing is required on the outside.
When a barrier is provided between the traffic lanes and the sidewalk,
use the bridge slab for the walkway (i.e., do not require an additional
pour for sidewalk). Advise the road plans designer to provide for any
necessary sidewalk ramping off the bridge.
Sidewalks and bikeways shall have a minimum cross slope of 0.01 ft./ft.
Protective Rails at Bridge Approaches
The ends of bridge railings must be protected from being impacted
(except on low speed roads such as city streets). For design speeds over
40 mph, a crash tested guardrail transition (normally plate beam
guardrail) is required.
Refer to State-Aid Operation
requirements on local bridges.
Rules,
Chapter
8820
for
guardrail
FEBRUARY 2007
2.1.3 Bridge
Undercrossing
Geometrics
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
2-7
General Criteria for Lateral Clearance

Bridge undercrossing geometrics must rationalize safety requirements
with costs and physical controls such as span length and permissible
depth of structure. The following guidelines apply in establishing these
geometrics:
1) Safety
Piers, abutments, side slopes and back slopes steeper than 1:3, and
guardrails can all be hazards to an out of control vehicle. It is
desirable at all bridge undercrossings to provide a clear zone recovery
area beside the roadway that is free from these hazards. This clear
zone is given in the Road Design Manual, Section 4-6.0 and is a
function of the roadway curvature, design speed, ADT, and ground
slope. For the area under bridges a practical maximum clear zone of
30 feet may be used as permitted in the 2002 AASHTO Roadside
Design Guide, Table 3.1 based on consistent use and satisfactory
performance. Eliminate side piers from the roadside area wherever
possible. The desirable bridge undercrossing will satisfy the above
safety criteria.
For those locations where it is totally impractical to provide a full clear
zone recovery area at an undercrossing (as at some railroad
underpasses and in certain urban situations), lesser side clearances
are permitted. Where the full recovery areas must be infringed upon,
the greatest side clearances that circumstances will permit shall be
used. A side clearance of 20 feet is not as desirable as 30 feet but is
still better than the absolute minimum clearance. Minimum lateral
clearances are specified under the section for Lateral Clearance for
Mainline Highways.
Where drainage must be carried along the roadway passing under a
bridge, either a culvert must be provided at the approach fill or the
ditch section must be carried through at the toe of the bridge
approach fill. The use of a culvert will often permit more desirable
bridge geometrics, but the culvert openings can also introduce a
roadside hazard.
A determination regarding drainage (need for
culverts, size of a culvert, and assessment of possible hazard) will be
a controlling factor in deciding geometrics of the bridge for the site.
2) Economics
Prestressed concrete beam spans (in length up to about 145 feet) are
normally the most economical type of construction for grade
separations. In addition, there will usually be greater economy in
constructing grade separations using two long spans rather than
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN

constructing four shorter
superstructure can be used.
spans,
2-8
provided
that
concrete
3) Aesthetics
The use of longer spans will necessitate a deeper superstructure and
higher approach fills. Consideration must be given to the effect of the
depth of structure on the overall appearance and design of the
undercrossing.
For rough calculations during preliminary planning, the depth of
highway bridge superstructures can be assumed to be about 1/20 of
the length of the longest span. (Depth of superstructure refers to the
dimension from top of slab to bottom of beam.)
Contact the
Preliminary Bridge Plans Engineer for the exact dimensions to be used
in final planning. Contact the Preliminary Bridge Plans Engineer for
depth of structure on railroad bridges.
Lateral Clearance for Mainline Highways
1) The desirable lateral clearance right and left from the edge of through
traffic lanes to any hazard (as described above) is the full clear zone.
30'-0" may be used as a practical maximum. Side piers shall be
eliminated entirely wherever feasible.
2) The details for rural design provide for selection of geometrics that
carry the ditch section through the bridge (Alternate B), and also
geometrics that have a filled ditch (Alternate A). (See Figures 2.1.4.1
and 2.1.4.3.) Alternate A permits a shorter bridge superstructure and
thereby improves the economics and the chance of eliminating side
piers and is used almost exclusively. However, Alternate A can only
be used where ditch culverts will be deleted or used without
introducing a significant safety hazard.
3) Where the roadway ditch section (rural design) is modified at the
bridge (Alternate A), a longitudinal transition from the ditch section to
the 0.04 ft./ft. side slope under the bridge must be provided. Use a
maximum longitudinal slope of 1:20.
4) For an auxiliary lane, the clear zone must be maintained from both
the through traffic lane and the auxiliary lane.
5) For ramps and tapers adjacent to the mainline highway, the clear
zone must be maintained from both the through lane and the taper.
A reduced design speed, usually 50 mph, is assumed for the taper.
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
2-9
6) Minimum Lateral Clearances

The following paragraphs list those instances where less than
desirable geometrics can be considered and describes the minimum
values that will apply. Where geometrics less than desirable are to be
used, approval of the State Bridge Engineer and State Design
Engineer must be obtained. For plate beam guardrail with standard
6'-3" post spacing, a minimum of 3'-0" is required between the face
of the guardrail and the face of the pier or abutment to allow room for
the guardrail to deflect. (See Road Design Manual 10-7.02.01.)
a) Through Traffic Lanes Right Side
For urban design, the lateral clearance on the right measured
from the edge of the through lane shall be not less than 10'-0"
width for an approaching shoulder plus the minimum width of
approaching berm. This will result in minimum dimension of
16'-0" from the edge of a lane to face of substructure unit.
For auxiliary lanes, tapers, and ramps along urban mainline
highways, the minimum lateral clearance from the edge of a lane
to face of pier or abutment on the right is 10'-0". This provides
room to construct the standard 6'-0" ramp shoulder plus providing
an additional 4'-0" of space for guardrail. However, in no event
shall the distance from the edge of a through lane to the face of a
pier be less than 16'-0".
For rural design, the lateral clearance on the right may be reduced
from the full clear zone distance at railroad overpasses. At these
locations the minimum clearance on the right shall be as described
above for urban designs.
b) Through Traffic Lanes Left Side of Divided Highways
i) Urban Highways with Continuous Median Barriers
The minimum clearances at continuous median barriers are
based on the use of a concrete barrier between the roadways.
(See Std. Plate 8322.)
For urban design, four-lane divided roadways, the minimum
clearance on the left will be based on providing an 8'-0" wide
shoulder from the edge of a through lane to median gutter line
away from the bridge.
The 8'-0" wide shoulder may be
infringed upon as necessary to carry the median barrier
around a bridge pier. At normal grade separations, using 3'-0"
thick piers, the 8'-0" shoulder may be reduced to 6'-2" at the
pier. (See Figure 2.1.4.12.)
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
2-10
For urban design, six- and eight-lane divided roadways, the

minimum clearance on the left is based on providing a
10'-0" minimum wide shoulder from the edge of a through
lane to median gutter line outside of the bridge. As described
above for four-lane divided roadways, this dimension may be
infringed upon as necessary to carry the median barrier
around a bridge pier. This may result in reducing the shoulder
width from 10'-0" to 8'-2" at normal grade separations
(assuming 3'-0" thick pier). (See Figure 2.1.4.12.)
ii) Urban Highways without Continuous Median Barriers
The warrant requiring a median barrier is based on the median
width and the ADT. (See Road Design Manual.) At those
locations where the clear distance to a center pier is less than
the clear zone distance from the edge of a lane, but where a
continuous barrier will not be provided, a plate beam barrier
will normally be required at the pier.
The pier with plate beam guardrail protection can be used only
in medians that are 18'-6" or wider for four-lane divided
highways, and 22'-6" or wider for six- and eight-lane divided
highways. (Dimensions are from the edge of lane to edge of
lane.) Piers on high speed roadways should not be placed in
medians narrower than 18'-6" (four- lane) or 22'-6" (six- or
eight-lane).
The face of the plate beam will be located 2'-0" from the face
of the pier. At normal grade separations (with 3'-0" pier
thickness) this will result in a dimension of 5'-6" from the edge
of lane to face of the guardrail on four-lane divided roads, and
a dimension of 7'-6" from the edge of lane to face of the
guardrail on six- and eight-lane divided roads.
iii) Rail Overpasses Using Rural Design
For rural design, the median width (edge of lane to edge of
lane) for roadways passing under railroads may be considered
for a reduction. Where a reduced width is used, the distance
from the edge of lane to face of pier should be not less than
20'-0".
Lateral Clearances for Ramps
When rural or urban ramps pass under a bridge independently, piers
should be eliminated and the approaching typical section should be
carried through the bridge. On extremely skewed bridges where piers
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
2-11
are necessary, place the face of pier 2'-0" further from roadway than toe
of back slope. (See Figure 2.1.4.8.)
Lateral Clearances for Local Roads
Lateral clearances for local roads are dependent on ADT. The applicable
values are shown on Figures 2.1.4.9 and 2.1.4.10.
Lateral Clearance for Local Streets
Locate the face of piers or abutments on or beyond the property line.
This will provide for the ultimate development of the section by local
authorities. A minimum distance of 6'-0" from the face of a curb to the
face of pier or abutment must be provided.
Lateral Clearance for Railroads
Lateral clearances at railroads are to be determined
1) The statutory clearances diagram shown
represents the absolute minimums that must
design, a minimum horizontal clearance of 9'-0"
is to be used (8'-6" legal).
as follows:
on Figure 2.1.4.11
be adhered to. For
to a pier or abutment
2) Side piers are placed 4'-0" in from the back slope control point (18'-0"
clear to the centerline of track for a cut section without a
maintenance road). This puts the face of pier 2'-0" outside the
bottom of a 3'-0" deep ditch with a 1:2 slope and allows the railroad
to periodically clean the ditch with track-mounted equipment.
3) Mn/DOT and FHWA have agreed to the horizontal clearances shown in
Figure 2.1.4.11 (25'-0" minimum clearance to pier, 30'-6" to back
slope control point) for mainline BNRR tracks at sites meeting the
following conditions:
a) When the standard will not increase the cost of the structure by
more than $50,000.
b) When sufficient vertical clearance exists between the tracks and
inplace or proposed roadway profile to accommodate the structure
depth necessary for the longer spans typically required by the
standard.
If these conditions cannot be met, submit a letter to the Railroad
Administration Section along with the signed Preliminary Bridge Plan
stating the reasons the standard cannot be met including an estimate
of the increased cost if applicable.
4) Back slopes shall be 1:2 and pass through the back slope control
point shown on Figure 2.1.4.11 for the applicable case.
The
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
2-12
dimension to the back slope control point indicates the maximum

extent of federal participation in the construction and must not be
exceeded.
5) The Preliminary Bridge Plans Engineer will contact the Railroad
Administration Section of the Office of Railroads and Waterways to
determine the need for provisions for a maintenance road for track
maintenance equipment.
If the Railroad Administration Section
determines that the need is justified, the dimension to the back slope
control point can be increased up to 8'-0".
Waterway Sections Under Bridge Crossing Streams
The Waterway Analysis (hydraulics report) gives information on the
required stream cross section under the bridge including waterway area
and low member elevation. Potential flood damage, both upstream and
downstream, and permitting agencies requirements must be considered.
Vertical Clearance for Underpasses
Table 2.1.3.1 lists the minimum vertical clearance requirements for trunk
highway underpasses.
Table 2.1.3.1
Vertical Clearance for Underpasses
TYPE OF STRUCTURE
DESIGN VERTICAL
CLEARANCES
Trunk Highway Under Roadway Bridge
16'-4"
Trunk Highway Under Railroad Bridge
16'-4"
Railroad Under Trunk Highway Bridge
23'-0" *
Trunk Highway Under Pedestrian Bridge
17'-4"
Trunk Highway Under Sign Bridge
17'-4"
Portal Clearances on Truss or Arch
20'-0"
Critical vertical clearance point offset 8'-6" from centerline of track, statutory
minimum vertical clearance is 22'-0".
For trunk highway bridges over local streets and roads, the minimum
vertical clearance is 16'-4" for rural-suburban designs and 14'-6" for
urban designs. For trunk highways crossing local roads or streets at a
freeway interchange, 16'-4" clearance is required. A complete list of
vertical clearances for local roads and streets is found in the
State-Aid Operations Rules, Chapter 8820.
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
2-13
The 2001 edition of the AASHTO book, A Policy on Geometric Design of

Highways and Streets, recommends 16'-0" of clearance for highway
bridges and 17'-0" for pedestrian bridges and sign bridges for freeways
and arterials, a minimum clearance of 1'-0" above the legal vehicle
height, and an allowance for future pavement resurfacing. (See pages
476, 511, and 767.) The legal height of a truck in Minnesota is 13'-6",
which, when the additional 1'-0" is added, gives 14'-6". A 4" allowance
for a future overlay added to the 16'-0" and 17'-0" clearances gives the
standard 16'-4" and 17'-4" dimensions. The Truck Permits Unit of
Mn/DOT reports 5 to 20 permit requests a day for load heights of 15'-0"
or greater and a few every day for load heights over 15'-6".
The clearance over highways applies to the traffic lanes and full usable
width of shoulders.
The additional foot of clearance under pedestrian and sign bridges is
provided because these bridges are much less substantial and could
collapse in the event of a hit.
Where bikeways pass under a bridge or through a tunnel, a vertical
clearance of 10'-0" is desirable for adequate vertical shy distance. (See
AASHTO Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities, August 1991,
page 25.) Where this is impractical to obtain, a lesser clearance down to
a minimum of 8'-0" is acceptable. Clearances below 10 feet on the local
road system will require a variance to the State-Aid Operations Rules,
Chapter 8.
The 23'-0" clearance over railroads allows for future ballast to be added
to the line. If this clearance cannot be met, the Railroad Administration
Section of the Office of Railroads and Waterways should be contacted. A
clearance between 22'-0" (legal minimum) and 23'-0" may be used with
approval of the railroad. For clearances below 22'-0", approval from the
Rail and Motor Carrier Procedures Unit of Mn/DOT is required and may be
granted in instances where clearance on the line is limited by other
bridges likely to remain in place for a substantial time.
Vertical Clearance over Waterways
1) Non-Navigable Waterways
A 3'-0" minimum clearance between the 50-year flood stage and low
point on the bridge superstructure is recommended. This amount of
clearance is desired to provide for larger floods and also for the
passage of ice and/or debris. If this amount of clearance is not
attainable due to constraints relating to structure depth, roadway
grades or other factors, reduced clearance may be allowed. The
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
2-14
Preliminary Bridge Plans Engineer, after consultation with the

Hydraulics Section and the Mn/DOT District Office, will determine the
required clearance.
2) Navigable Waterways
a) Waterways that require a construction permit from Coast Guard
(generally considered to be waterways for commercial shipping):
The Mississippi River downstream from I-694 in Fridley
The Minnesota River downstream from Chaska
The St. Croix River downstream from Taylors Falls
The St. Louis River downstream from Oliver, Wisconsin.
Guide vertical clearances published by the Coast Guard are:
Mississippi River:
52'-0" above 2% flowline or 60'-0" above normal pool,
whichever is greater, for the portion downstream of the
Burlington Northern Railroad Bridge near the University of
Minnesota (mile point 853.0).
4'-0" above river stage of 40,000 c.f.s. for the river portion
upstream (mile point 853.0 to 857.6).
Minnesota River:
55'-0" above normal pool from mouth to I-35W bridge
(mile point 10.8).
30.8 feet above 1881 high water from I-35W bridge to
Chaska.
St. Croix River:
52'-0" above 2% flowline or 60'-0" above normal pool from
mouth to Stillwater.
St. Louis River:
The Bong Bridge over the St. Louis River Bay in Duluth has
a vertical clearance of 120'-0".
The Preliminary Bridge Plans Engineer shall be consulted when
establishing navigation clearances.
b) All Other Navigable Waterways
Bridges that cross waterways in other portions of the state may be
required to provide for local pleasure boat traffic.
Vertical
clearance for these bridges will be determined on an individual
basis, based on local needs. The Mn/DOT District Office will make
this determination based on a survey of boats using the waterway.
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
2-15
Vertical and Horizontal Alignment

Information governing vertical curves, horizontal curves, and sight
distance may be found in the Road Design Manual and Technical Manual.
When preparing preliminary bridge plans for the local road system,
vertical and horizontal alignment charts from the State-Aid Manual shall
be employed.
2.1.4 Geometric
Details
Specific geometric details for bridge decks and undercrossings are shown
in the following figures:
Figure 2.1.4.1
2-Lane Highway (Rural)
Figure 2.1.4.2
2-Lane Highway (Urban)
Figure 2.1.4.3
4-Lane Divided Highway (Rural)
Figure 2.1.4.4
4-Lane Divided Highway (Urban)
Figure 2.1.4.5
Figure 2.1.4.6
Figure 2.1.4.7
6" Raised Island, Turn Lanes, and Sidewalk (Urban)
Figure 2.1.4.8
Ramps (Rural and Urban)
Figure 2.1.4.9
Local Roads (Rural)
Figure 2.1.4.10
Local Roads (Urban)
Figure 2.1.4.11
Railroad Clearances
Figure 2.1.4.12
Minimum Lateral Clearances (Urban)
The above figures for various roadway types show sections as viewed
assuming traffic flow from bottom to top of page. Starting at the bottom
of the sheet, the typical fill roadway section to a bridge approach is
shown. The fill slope transitions to a 1:3 slope at the bridge. The section
above it shows a section of this road on the bridge deck. The third
section from the bottom is a continuation of the roadway as it approaches
a crossing under a bridge; the back slope transitions to a 1:2 maximum
slope at the bridge. The top section shows this roadway at the point
where a bridge crosses this roadway.
Where a range of side slopes is shown on the approaching roadway
section, Road Design should determine the slope used.
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 2.1.4.1
Geometrics
2-Lane Highway (Rural)
2-16
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 2.1.4.2
Desirable Geometrics
2-Lane Highway (Urban)
2-17
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 2.1.4.3
2-18
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 2.1.4.4
2-19
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 2.1.4.5
2-20
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 2.1.4.6
(Details for 8-Lane Divided Highway Are Similar)
2-21
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 2.1.4.7
6" Raised Island, Turn Lanes, and Sidewalks (Urban)
2-22
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 2.1.4.8
Ramps (Rural and Urban)
2-23
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 2.1.4.9
Local Roads
(Rural)
2-24
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 2.1.4.10
Local Roads
(Urban)
2-25
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 2.1.4.11
Railroad Clearances
2-26
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 2.1.4.12
Minimum Lateral Clearances
2-27
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
2-28
2.1.5 Bridge
Railings
See Section 13 of this manual for the policy on design of bridge railings
for Mn/DOT projects.
2.2 Bridge
Aesthetics
The aesthetic design process is initiated early in a bridge projects life.

The Preliminary Bridge Plans Engineer will determine which of three
levels of aesthetic attention is appropriate for the bridge.
Level A is intended for bridges with major cultural or aesthetic
significance.
Level B is used for mid-level structures, including highway corridors.
Level C is used for routine bridges.
Maximum levels of Mn/DOT participation in aesthetic costs are given in
the Mn/DOT Policy Manual, Chapter 6, 6-41. For Level A the maximum is
15% but not to exceed $3 million per bridge; for Level B the maximum is
7% but not to exceed $300,000 per bridge; for Level C the maximum is
5% but not to exceed $200,000 per bridge.
The Preliminary Bridge Plans Engineer along with the District Project
Manager coordinates the implementation of the aesthetic design process
as it relates to bridges. Other people, offices, agencies, etc. may also be
involved. The extent of this involvement may vary depending on the
individual project and its aesthetics level. This process leads to the
development of an Aesthetic Plan for the bridge. Once the project
reaches the final stage, the Bridge Design Unit Leader directs the
implementation of the Aesthetic Plan to completion with assistance from
the Preliminary Bridge Architectural Specialist as needed.
Section 3 of the Aesthetic Guidelines for Bridge Design Manual describes
the process of aesthetic design in more detail.
2.3 Preliminary
Bridge Plans
2.3.1 General
Purpose
The Preliminary Bridge Plan serves to document the main features of the
bridge (type, size, location, aesthetics, etc.) and is used to obtain
approvals and coordination before final design begins. By doing this, the
time and expense of revising a completed plan will hopefully be avoided.
The plan coordinates the work between Road Design and the Bridge
Office and enables the cost and scope of the work to be estimated.
Specific users of the plan include:
Road Design to verify the grade, alignment and roadway widths and
to obtain the approximate limits of grading, paving and guardrail at
the bridge ends.
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
2-29
FHWA to review and approve projects.

Bridge Agreements and Permits Unit to select and negotiate contracts
with consultants.
Final Bridge Design Units and Consultants to prepare final plans.
Bridge Programs and Estimates Unit to prepare a preliminary estimate
of the bridge costs.
DNR, Coast Guard, Corps of Engineers and Watershed Districts to
review and issue required permits for stream crossings.
Cities, Planning Agencies, and citizen groups to review and approve
projects.
Site Development Unit to recommend aesthetic treatments.
Signing, Lighting, and TMC Units to convey their needs on the new
bridge.
Railroad Administration Section for use in negotiating railroad
agreements.
In preparing preliminary bridge plans, the plan users should always be

kept in mind, particularly those without bridge or technical experience.
Requirements for Preliminary Bridge Plans
Preliminary bridge plans are required for all new trunk highway bridges
(including Mn/DOT precast concrete arch structures) and all bridge
widenings where substructure widening is required.
In addition,
preliminary plans signed by the State Bridge Engineer are required for all
county and local bridges that cross a trunk highway. Preliminary bridge
plans are not required for culverts, overlays, deck replacements, and
other projects where substructures are not widened.
The Bridge Preliminary Unit normally prepares preliminary plans for new
trunk highway bridges, although consultants occasionally develop plans.
Preliminary plans for bridge widenings are normally prepared by the
Bridge Design Units since significant design work is required to evaluate
the existing structure and schemes for widening and handling traffic.
Preliminary plans prepared by Consultants or Design Units are submitted
to the Bridge Preliminary Unit for review, submittal to the State Bridge
Engineer for signature, and distribution of signed copies.
Contents
The Preliminary Bridge Plan consists of a general plan and elevation sheet
and survey sheet with borings. For the more complex urban structures
additional road design sheets giving alignment, superelevation diagrams,
utilities, contours, traffic staging or intersection layout may be included.
The Preliminary Bridge Plan contains: plan and elevation views, a cross
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
2-30
section, design data, data on the type of structure, foundation

requirements, and aesthetic treatment. When aesthetics are of special
importance, architectural type drawings showing the proposed treatment
or type of construction may also be included. For bridge widenings, the
survey sheet may be eliminated or a copy of the survey sheet from the
existing bridge may be included.
Preparation of Preliminary Bridge Plans
The steps involved in preparing a typical preliminary plan set for a new
trunk highway bridge by the Preliminary Unit are as follows:
1) Layouts are received from Pre-Design and bridge numbers are
assigned and listed in PPMS.
2) Bridge Survey sheets are received from the district surveys section.
Copies are sent to the Foundations Unit of the Office of Materials and
Research requesting soil borings. For stream crossings a copy is sent
to the Hydraulics Unit requesting a hydraulics analysis.
3) A depth of structure and span arrangement are determined using the
layout and Waterway Analysis and are given to Road Design. This
typically involves communication between the Bridge Office, Road
Design, and Hydraulics to arrive at a structure depth and span
arrangement that produces the best overall solution. If a railroad is
involved, negotiations are held with the railroad to determine what
features should be incorporated into the plan to satisfy the railroad's
needs and also meet Mn/DOT standards.
4) Final grades and alignment are received from Road Design.
5) Traffic data is requested and received from the district traffic office.
6) The Preliminary Bridge Plans Engineer, District Project Manager, and
Environmental Services Section determine the extent of aesthetic
treatment.
7) A CADD operator is assigned the project and drafting of the plan
begins.
Clearances are checked and more exact span lengths
determined.
8) Borings are received electronically from the Foundations Unit and
plotted on the survey sheets.
9) The Engineering Specialist in the Design Unit checks the completed
preliminary package, except the foundation type.
10) The preliminary package is given to the Regional Bridge Construction
Engineer along with the foundation report for determining pile type,
lengths, and bearing. When received, the pile information is added
to the preliminary plan.
11) The completed Preliminary Bridge Plan is reviewed with the Bridge
Planning and Hydraulics Engineer and taken to the State Bridge
Engineer for signature.
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
2-31
Time Schedule for Preliminary Plan Preparation

The time schedule for receiving information and completing preliminary
bridge plans for normal bridges, as given in PPMS, is shown in Table
2.3.1.1.
Table 2.3.1.1
Preliminary Plan Time Schedule
WORK ITEM
TIME PRIOR TO SCHEDULED

LETTING DATE
Bridge Survey
17 months
Hydraulics
14 months
Grades and Alignment
14 months
Foundations
13 months
Preliminary Plan Completed
12 months
Additional lead-time is required for major bridges, bridges involving agreements with
cities or railroads, and bridges with extensive aesthetic requirements.
Use of Preliminary Bridge Plans

The completed and signed Preliminary Bridge Plan becomes the
departments official proposal for that structure. The following steps are
then taken:
1) Unless cost estimates have been prepared to determine structure
type, the Program and Estimates Unit of the Bridge Office prepares an
estimated contract construction cost for the structure.
This is
generally based on an estimated cost per square foot.
2) Sets of prints of the Preliminary Bridge Plan are distributed to the
various offices of Mn/DOT and outside agencies for information,
review, and approval, as the case may be. (See Table 2.3.1.2.)
Approval by all concerned of the proposed structure dimensions, type
of construction, and geometrics before the start of final design is one
of the most important functions of the Preliminary Bridge Plan. This
is particularly true of stream crossings, railroad crossings (over and
under), and structures requiring special aesthetic treatment.
Table 2.3.1.2
1
4
(minimum)
Geotechnical Engineering
Section - Foundations
Freeway Operations Traffic

Management Center (TMC)
Technical Support
Utility Agreements and
Permits Unit (UAPU)
Freight and Commercial

Vehicle Operations
Four sets of
prints for each
railroad
involved.
Review with
affected
utilities.
(2)
(1)
REVIEW
TO:
INFO. &
TRANSMITTAL
(2)
Railroad crossings only.
Sent by Bridge Utilities Coordinator (BUC).
Reply to Bridge Office as to need for conduit, and

mounting devices for surveillance system.
Comments, if any, given to Bridge Office.
Reply to Bridge Office as to need for lights, signals, and

conduits bridge mounting signs.
Sent with estimate by Bridge Estimation Unit.

Foundations Report to be included with plan. Copy of
Bridge Office transmittal letter returned stamped
APPROVED or letter of reply with qualifications sent to
Commissioner.
Comments, if any, to Bridge Office.

For stream
crossings the District Hydraulics Engineer may include
plan with application for DNR, Army Corps of
Engineers, or watershed permits. Copies of permits
are to be filed with Central Office Right of Way.
Sent with cost estimate by Bridge Estimating Unit.

Comments, if any, given to Bridge Office.
REMARKS
Refer to 2.3.1 for plans that must be sent to FHWA for

approval.
APPROVAL
PURPOSE
(1) Unusual bridges and structures on the Interstate System are forwarded to
the FHWA Headquarters Division in Washington for approval.
The
Washington Office is available for technical assistance on other Federal-aid
and non-Federal-aid structures when requested.
Traffic, Security, and

Operations
(2)
District
Final Design Engineer
Federal Highway
Administration
- Bridge Engineer
NO. OF SETS
District Engineer
BRIDGE OFFICE TO:
FOR
NORMAL DISTRIBUTION OF PRELIMINARY BRIDGE PLANS
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
2-32
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
2-33
The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) is one of the outside

agencies that reviews bridge projects. The following categorizes
bridge projects according to the amount of FHWA oversight required
and also sets forth submittal requirements:
Bridge Projects that Require Full Oversight by FHWA

This category includes new or reconstruction (rehabilitation and
improvement) bridge projects on the Interstate System with total
project cost more than $1,000,000 (bridges that carry interstate
traffic and interchange bridges). It also includes other National
Highway System bridges in which the bridge structure estimated
cost is equal to or over $10 million. Preliminary bridge plans, if
prepared, as well as final plans, specifications and estimates
(PS&E) will be submitted to FHWA for approval. Final plans at
85% to 90% completion will also be submitted to FHWA for
concurrent review. Please note that preliminary plans are not
normally prepared for bridge improvement projects.
Bridge Projects that Require Partial Oversight by FHWA

This category includes new or reconstruction (rehabilitation and
improvement) bridge projects that carry traffic over the Interstate
Highway regardless of funding source. Preliminary bridge plans, if
prepared, will be submitted to FHWA for approval.
This
submission is only for the purpose of evaluating horizontal and
vertical clearances on the Interstate System.
Bridge Projects for which Mn/DOT Maintains Oversight

This category includes any bridge project not included in the
above full and partial oversight categories.
The following apply to Bridge Projects that Require Full Oversight by

FHWA, Bridge Projects that Require Partial Oversight by FHWA, and
Bridge Projects for which Mn/DOT Maintains Oversight:
The Preliminary Bridge Plan will be submitted to FHWA with a
transmittal letter. FHWA will not require a preliminary cost estimate
but will review the preliminary plan, elevation, and transverse
sections. It is very important that these plans be submitted to FHWA
as soon as they are developed and prior to proceeding with final
design.
Funding source does not change the above processes.
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
2-34
For Mn/DOT oversight projects, a courtesy copy of the letter

transmitting the Preliminary Bridge Plan for the proposed bridge
project will be sent to FHWA (without the plans) for informational
purposes.
FHWA Headquarters Bridge Division shall be responsible for the
approval of preliminary plans for unusual bridges and structures on
the Interstate System. FHWA Headquarters Bridge Division will be
available for technical assistance on other Federal-aid and nonFederal-aid highways when requested.
For the purpose of this guidance, unusual bridges are those bridges:
(1) that have difficult or unique foundation problems, (2) that have
new or complex designs with unique operational or design features,
(3) with exceptionally long spans, (4) being designed with procedures
that depart from currently recognized acceptable practices. Examples
of unusual bridges include cable-stayed, suspension, arch, segmental
concrete, movable, or truss bridges. Other examples are bridge types
that are not addressed by the AASHTO bridge design standards and
guide specifications, bridges requiring abnormal dynamic analysis for
seismic design, bridges with spans exceeding 500 feet, and bridges
with major supporting elements of ultra high strength concrete or
steel.
Unusual structures include tunnels, geotechnical structures featuring
new or complex wall systems or ground improvement systems, and
hydraulic structures that involve complex stream stability
countermeasures, or designs or design techniques that are atypical or
unique.
Preliminary documents submitted to FHWA Headquarters should
include the Preliminary Bridge Plan and supporting data along with
FHWA Divisions review comments and recommendations. Supporting
information should include bridge/structures related environmental
concerns and suggested mitigation measures, studies of bridge types
and span arrangements, approach bridge span layout plans and
profile sheets, controlling vertical and horizontal clearance
requirements, roadway geometry, design specifications used, special
design criteria, special provisions (if available), and cost estimates.
Hydraulic and scour design studies/reports should also be submitted
showing scour predictions and related mitigation measures.
Geotechnical studies/reports should be submitted along with
information on substructure and foundation types.
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
2-35
For these projects, the State Bridge Engineer will submit two copies of
the Preliminary Bridge Plan along with a transmittal letter requesting
approval directly to the Division Engineer of the Federal Highway
Administration. The transmittal letter also includes the estimated
contract construction cost of the structure. (See Figure 2.3.1.1 for a
sample transmittal letter). The FHWA is the only outside agency to
which the Bridge Office sends a direct request for approval. All other
outside agencies are contacted through other offices of Mn/DOT.
3) The Preliminary Bridge Plan is used as a basis for preparing permit
drawings to accompany applications to construct structures and
approaches over navigable waters of the United States within or
bordering our state. Such drawings are prepared in the Preliminary
Plans Unit in accordance with detailed instructions issued by the U.S.
Coast Guard. The Coast Guard is charged with the responsibility of
issuing permits for bridges over navigable waters of the United States
within or bordering our state.
This includes all bridge spans
(including land spans) from abutment to abutment. The Corps of
Engineers is responsible for issuing permits for any other
miscellaneous structures or work to be performed in navigable waters
of the United States.
There are two Coast Guard districts that have jurisdiction within the
State of Minnesota; the 9th Coast Guard District based in Cleveland
has jurisdiction over the Duluth harbor and navigable portion of the
St. Louis River, and the 8th Coast Guard District based in St. Louis has
jurisdiction over the navigable portions of the Mississippi, Minnesota,
and St. Croix Rivers.
After receiving a permit application, the Coast Guard issues a public
notice of application with prints of the permit drawings. These are
sent to shipping interests, other agencies, displayed in post offices,
etc. Generally, if no comments are received from others within
30 days of the notice of application, and if environmental statements
have been submitted and a certification given by the Minnesota
Pollution Control Agency, a permit will be issued.
Correspondence to the Coast Guard is generally prepared for the
signature of the State Bridge Engineer.
4) When all approvals have been obtained, the Preliminary Bridge Plan is
used as the basis for the bridge design and for the preparation of final
detailed plans. If the design is to be by a consulting engineer, the
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
2-36
Preliminary Bridge Plan is also used as the basis for negotiation of the
consultant fee.
Preliminary Plans for Local Bridges
Consult the State-Aid Bridge Web site at:
http://www.dot.state.mn.us/bridge/StateAidBridge/ for the submittal and
approval process of State-Aid Preliminary Bridge Plans.
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 2.3.1.1
2-37
FEBRUARY 2007
2.3.2 Bridge Type
Selection
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
2-38
General
The type of structure and span arrangement selected will depend on cost,
aesthetics, depth available, geometrics, and site conditions. For some
bridges this may be an obvious choice. For others it may involve a great
deal of study, especially if aesthetics is a main concern. The section that
follows gives some general guidelines on the selection process.
Aesthetic Design Process
See Section 2.2 of this manual for a discussion of the aesthetic design
process.
Structure Type
The most commonly used structure types and their characteristics are as
follows:
1) Prestressed Concrete Beam
This is the most common structure type in Minnesota. Advantages
include: low initial and future maintenance costs, high quality factory
produced product, a stiff deck, and simple spans that accommodate
tapers. Beams are limited to standard depths and straight segments,
and a maximum length of about 145 feet based on shipping
limitations.
2) Welded or Rolled Steel Beam
This type of structure is well suited to complex urban freeways with
limited depth, long spans, and complex geometrics. Steel beam
bridges are also well suited for areas with bad soils, such as the Red
River Valley, as steel allows the flexibility of modifying the bearing
location and adding or reducing span lengths to accommodate shifting
abutments and piers. Advantages include: a shallower depth of
structure than prestressed concrete, beams with the ability to be field
spliced to produce long span lengths, web plates that can be cut to
any depth or to a haunched shape, beams that can be curved
horizontally, and beams that can be painted a color which contrasts
with the slab to make the structure appear thinner. Disadvantages
include: a typically higher cost than other structure types, more
difficult fabrication and inspection, a longer fabrication time, the
possible need for painting and future maintenance painting,
weathering steel staining of supports, rusting of weathering steel
when under salt exposure, and required annual inspections.
3) Cast-In-Place Concrete Slab Span
This type of structure is used for shorter span bridges where depth is
a major consideration. For simple spans conventionally reinforced,
spans range up to 40 feet. Continuous spans are limited to about
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
2-39
60 feet. (See table in Section 5.3.1 of this manual for limits.)

Advantages include: a minimum depth superstructure, ease of design
and detailing, pleasing aesthetics, and economy for short span
bridges. Disadvantages include: span lengths are limited, falsework
is required, concrete delivery rate requirements may be a problem, a
wearing course may be required to achieve a smooth ride, and the
maximum skew angle is 45.
4) Concrete Box Girder
Concrete box girders provide an attractive structure with high
torsional resistance making them especially well suited for curved
structures. The ability to accommodate an integral pier cap is an
advantage since horizontal clearance is only required to the column
top and not the cap top. Limitations and drawbacks include the need
for falsework, the inability to redeck or widen, and the higher
construction cost.
5) Timber
This bridge structure is used only on the local road system, for 1 or 3
spans with a maximum span length of about 25 feet. Advantages
include: timber has a natural and aesthetically pleasing appearance,
special equipment is not required for installation, and construction can
be done in virtually any weather conditions. Disadvantages include:
timber is not an economical structure type, it is limited to low-volume
roads (roads with an ADT under 750), and the asphalt wearing
surface tends to crack due to differential deck deflections.
6) Pre-cast Double Tee Beam Span
This bridge structure is used only on the local road system. The
maximum span length is 48 feet for 22" depth stem, and a span
length of 64 feet for 30" depth stem is typical. Advantages include:
reduced construction time, reduced inspection time, and an
economical pre-cast bridge in the 30 foot to 40 foot span range.
Disadvantages include:
not appropriate on steep grades, flared
bridges, curved bridges, and skewed bridges of higher ADT roadways
where salt is applied to the bridge.
7) Box Culvert
Box culverts provide a quickly constructed, and economical structure
for stream crossings. Precast concrete box culvert standards are
available for culverts up to 14 ft. x 14 ft. in size. Use of up to two
large barrel boxes will be economical compared with a bridge.
Advantages include:
quick installation and low maintenance.
Disadvantages include: span limitations, possible debris build-up
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
2-40
when multiple barrels are used, and lack of a natural stream for fish
unless the invert is lowered and riprapped.
8) Three-Sided Bridge Structure
Three-sided precast concrete structures offer an alternative for short
span structures up to 42 feet. Advantages include: quick installation,
and a natural stream bottom. Disadvantages include: a higher cost
than cast-in-place structures.
Abutment and Pier Locations
The following guidelines aid in setting abutment and pier locations:
1) Stream Crossings
For stream crossings the number of substructures in the stream
should be kept to the minimum practical. Piers in streams block the
natural flow of the waterway, trap ice and debris, impede navigation,
and are subject to scour. In addition, construction of a stream pier is
expensive (especially if cofferdams are needed), and environmentally
disturbs the stream bottom and water quality. Piers and abutments
should ideally be set on shore to minimize dewatering and allow easy
access for the Contractor. Substructures should also be set to avoid
interference with inplace substructures, including piling, wherever
practical. Setting spans and structure depth involves balancing the
hydraulic requirements of the low member elevation and waterway
area with the constraints of approach grades, structure depth, and
cost.
2) Grade Separations
For grade separations fewer piers are also desirable wherever
practical. Piers should be kept out of the clear zone unless absolutely
necessary. In locations where ramps enter or exit a highway under a
bridge, piers should be avoided between the mainline and ramp, if
possible, as they restrict visibility.
Abutment Types
Abutments can generally be classified as stub, semi-high or high
abutments.
A further breakdown of stub abutments can be made
according to the way expansion is handled integral (fixed) or parapet
type.
Stub abutments with a standard berm were used extensively on fourspan freeway overpass structures. Since the end spans are short there is
no problem providing additional length for the berms, which provides
extra protection for the abutment. The use of longer two-span structures
for overpasses has diminished its use, but this abutment type is still used
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
2-41
where depth and spans will permit. The extra protection provided by the
berm is especially important for stream crossings.
Semi-high abutments part way up the fill slope have become more
popular as two-span overpasses have come into use. A higher abutment
and elimination of the berm reduces the span length and depth of beam,
which makes the structure more economical.
From an aesthetic
standpoint an exposed face greater than the depth of the beam and less
than half the roadway clearance below the beams is desirable. Exposed
heights of abutment face should be limited to about 8 feet, if possible.
High abutments at the bottom of the fill slope are used primarily in
congested urban design where structure depth is critical. Their use is
discouraged since they are difficult to construct, expensive, and give a
closed-in feel to the highway.
Parallel wingwalls, parallel to the bridge roadway, are used most often for
aesthetic reasons. An angled wingwall, 45 degrees for bridges with no
skew, will give shorter wingwall lengths and less length of railing. These
are used on some stream crossings where the elevation view of the
bridge is not as prominent and the wingwalls help direct the stream flow
under the bridge. Straight wingwalls, an extension of the abutment
parapet, are the simplest to construct but are appropriate only for
shallow beams where aesthetics is not a concern.
Guidelines for the use of integral and parapet abutments are given in
Section 11 of this manual.
Pier Types
1) Stream Crossings
Pile bent piers, consisting of a row of piles with a concrete cap
encasing the pile tops, are the simplest and most economical type of
pier. They are used for stream crossings where the maximum height
from the top of pier to streambed is under 20'-0" and there is no ice
or debris problem. Spans must also be short enough to allow a single
row of piles to support the deck at reasonable spacing. The piles act
as columns, and bending strength to resist side impacts from ice or
debris is important. For cast-in-place piles (the most widely used) a
16" minimum diameter is required. If H-piles are used, the upper
portion is encased by a cast-in-place pile shell filled with concrete.
Timber piles are not permitted. Concerns with pile bent piers include
the potential to trap debris, and its appearance.
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
2-42
A wall type pier, consisting of a single row of piles (especially H-piles)

encased with concrete to form a wall, provides more resistance to ice
and debris and allows debris to pass through without becoming
entangled on the piles.
This type of pier is used where more
resistance to ice and debris than afforded by the pile bent is needed,
and yet the size and expense of a solid shaft pier can be avoided.
This type of pier can be constructed by driving the piling, supporting
the wall forms on the stream bed, placing a seal with a tremie,
dewatering, adding reinforcement, and pouring the wall.
A solid shaft pier is used for major stream crossings where heavy
loads, tall piers or sizable ice and debris loads may occur. This type
of pier has a separate footing located a minimum of 6'-0" below
streambed. Construction of this type of pier involves driving sheeting
to form a cofferdam, excavating inside the cofferdam, driving piles,
pouring a seal, dewatering, and concrete placement.
2) Grade Separations
Piers at grade separations are typically multiple column type with a
cap. Piers are visible to passing motorists and the emphasis on
aesthetics has led to more use of rectangular shaped column type
piers, often with form liner treatments or rustication grooves. For
narrow ramp bridges a single shaft pier may be considered. Where
aesthetics is not a concern, a round column pier will usually provide
the lowest cost.
For bridges over railroads, piers located within 25 feet of the
centerline of railroad tracks must either be of heavy construction
(refer to Section 11.2.4 for requirements) or have crash walls. Piers
located between 25 and 50 feet of the centerline of railroad tracks
must be designed to withstand a 400 kip load unless they are
protected as specified in LRFD 3.6.5.1.
For the majority of bridges over roadways, piers located within
30 feet of the roadway edge (defined as the edge of the lane nearest
to the pier) must be designed to withstand a 400 kip load unless they
are protected as specified in LRFD 3.6.5.1. See Section 11.2.4 of this
manual for complete pier protection policy and requirements.
FEBRUARY 2007
2.4 Final Bridge
Plans and Special
Provisions
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
2-43
The primary purpose for preparing the Final Bridge Plan and special
provisions is to communicate the geometric, material, and procedural
requirements for the construction of a bridge. Several audiences will use
the final design or contract documents during the life of the bridge.
Initially, contractors use the documents to prepare their bids. A clear,
accurate, and complete set of documents will result in competitive
bidding. Well-communicated information reduces contractor uncertainty
regarding what is required for different elements of construction.
During construction, many parties will use the contract documents. For
example, surveyors will locate and mark the position of working points,
fabricators and construction engineers will prepare shop drawings and
other submittals/drawings, inspectors and suppliers will use the
documents for their work, and the contractors forces will use the
documents.
After construction of the bridge the detailed plans will be referenced
when modifying the bridge (e.g., adding signage), performing load rating
of the bridge, or rehabilitating/replacing the bridge.
The Final Bridge Plan contains geometric information, a schedule of
quantities and pay items for the bridge, traffic phasing (if applicable),
limits of removal of existing structures and foundation items (if
applicable), foundation details, substructure details, superstructure
details, typical sections, utilities (if applicable), survey information, and
other miscellaneous items.
Specifications are also required for each project.
They describe
procedures for award and execution of the contract, how work will be
measured and paid, procedures to be followed during execution of the
work, and material and testing requirements for items incorporated into
the project.
Bridge projects use specifications from four different sources:
1) Most of the specifications used for a project are provided in Mn/DOTs
Standard Specifications for Construction.
They are necessarily
general in nature and are intended to cover all types of Mn/DOT
projects.
2) The Bridge Office has assembled additional specifications. Because
they are not included in the standard specifications they are called
special provisions. A list of available bridge special provisions is
provided in Appendix 2-B. Special provisions address a variety of
work items, ranging from concrete placement in District 8 to the
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
2-44
fabrication and installation of pot bearings. Not all of the special

provisions are intended to be used on every project; rather, designers
should use only those applicable to the project.
3) The State-Aid Unit has additional bridge special provisions that apply
to local road bridge projects.
4) Custom special provisions. If a work item is of such unique character
that the standard specifications and the bridge special provisions
dont describe or address the work, a custom special provision will
need to be prepared. Custom special provisions may be generated
for any number of items. Items may include schedules (e.g., dates
the contractor will have access to certain portions of the project) or
lists of required submittals, etc.
In general, information that is highly graphical or geometric in nature
should be presented on plan sheets. Large amounts of information
conveyed with text should be assembled in special provisions.
A specification or special provision usually contains the following five
sections:
1) A description
2) A list of the materials used (and their specifications)
3) Construction requirements for the work
4) A description of how the work will be measured
5) The basis of payment (pay item for the work)
Oversight by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) is required for
some bridge projects. See Section 2.3.1 of this manual under Use of
Preliminary Bridge Plans for FHWA degree of oversight categories and
plan submittal requirements.
2.4.1 Final Design

Instructions
Unless specified otherwise within this manual, all structures shall be

designed in accordance with the current AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design
Specifications. For those few cases where LRFD specifications have not
been created or adopted, the AASHTO Standard Specifications for
Highway Bridges shall be used.
These exceptions to the LRFD
specifications include: long span specialty bridges and sheet piling.
Discuss exceptions with the Bridge Design Engineer prior to beginning
final design.
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
2-45
Railroad bridges shall be designed according to the current AREMA

specifications for the live load specified by the railroad. Additional notes
concerning the design of railroad bridges:
1) Railroad bridges will usually be designed with simple spans to avoid
uplift from the live load.
2) Bridges for the Duluth Mesabe & Iron Range Railway require a special
live load.
Plans and documents prepared during the preliminary design phase
should be reviewed prior to beginning final design. These documents
include:
1) Preliminary Bridge Plan
2) Bridge Construction Unit Foundation Recommendation Report
3) Design Study Report
4) Letter File
When reviewing preliminary plans, pay particular attention to geometry
and utilities.
Check the layout.
This includes reviewing grades,
stationing, end slopes, beams, railings, roadways, shoulders, and the
median (if applicable).
2.4.1.1
Superstructure
Space beams so moments in fascia beams will not be larger than

moments in interior beams.
2.4.1.1.1 Framing
Plan
For steel beams and prestressed I-beams, deck projections beyond the
centerline of the fascia beam should generally not exceed the smaller of:
1) Depth of beam
2) 40% of the beam spacing
3) 2'-8" plus one-half the flange width
The minimum slab projection beyond the tip of the flange shall be
6 inches.
For rectangular prestressed beams, the overhang is a concern when the
location of a wheel line falls outside of the beam. Keep the maximum
overhang projection beyond the centerline of the fascia beam to
approximately 2'-8".
FEBRUARY 2007
2.4.1.1.2 Concrete
Wearing Course
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
2-46
For bridges with reinforced concrete decks, the deck may be cast in one
or two lifts. If two lifts are used, the second one is called the wearing
course and is placed during original construction of the bridge. Note that
the wearing course and the future wearing course are separate and
distinct items.
The wearing course shall be low slump concrete. Bridges meeting any of
the following criteria shall use a concrete wearing course:
1) All bridges carrying interstate traffic.
2) All interstate highway bridges at an interchange with access to the
interstate.
3) All bridges carrying trunk highway traffic in major metropolitan areas
and municipalities with populations of 5000 or greater.
4) All bridges on highways with 20-year projected ADT greater than
2,000.
The State Bridge Engineer shall determine the appropriate action on any
individual exceptions to this policy.
2.4.1.1.3
Diaphragms and
Cross Frames
In most bridges, the orientation of the primary superstructure elements

is parallel to the centerline of the bridge. Aside from slab bridges, most
bridges in Minnesota are supported on multiple beam lines. The beam
lines are typically spaced on 5 to 15 foot centers. These bridges usually
have diaphragms or cross frames. They serve a number of purposes:
1) They provide compression flange bracing during erection and
construction of the bridge.
2) They increase lateral load distribution (more beams or girders
participate in carrying live loads).
3) They provide a load path for lateral loads to be carried from the deck
to the bearings.
During final plan assembly, specify the type of diaphragm on the framing
plan, the deck cross section, and the longitudinal section.
For bridges with integral abutments, the end diaphragm also functions as
an abutment element. Provide a construction joint between the end
diaphragm and the approach panel to accommodate settlement under the
approach panel. To facilitate the transfer of axial load from the deck into
the end diaphragms, provide a concrete fillet as shown on Details B809
and B811.
FEBRUARY 2007
2.4.1.2 Pedestrian
Bridges
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
2-47
Pedestrian bridges shall be designed in accordance with the Guide

Specifications for Design of Pedestrian Bridges.
Several additional
constraints are placed on pedestrian bridges to ensure they are
accessible, safe, and durable:
1) The standard width for pedestrian bridges is 8'-0". This dimension is
from face of handrail to face of handrail. Bridges carrying bicycle
traffic shall be 2'-0" wider than the approaching bikeway width with a
maximum width of 12'-0".
2) The maximum grade permitted on a pedestrian bridge is 8.33%. A
grade flatter than the maximum is preferable. When the grade is
steeper than 5%, a 5'-0" platform shall be provided for each change
in elevation of 2'-6".
3) Protective screening, preferably a chain link fence system or a railing
system, must be placed on both sides of the bridge. The height of
the fence or railing must be 8'-0" above the top of the sidewalk. For
sites with special aesthetic treatments involving ornamental railings, a
minimum height of 6'-0" will be allowed.
4) A 6'-0" clear platform shall be provided at the bottom of each ramp.
5) A platform shall be provided at each abrupt change in a horizontal
direction. The minimum plan dimension of a platform is 5'-0" by
5'-0".
6) The profile grade should be laid out such that there are no abrupt
grade breaks at expansion devices.
7) Only in the rare case where handicap accessibility need not be
provided can stairs be incorporated into a design. When stairs are
provided, use the following guidelines:
a) Stairs shall have a 1'-0" tread and a 6" rise.
b) Adjust the sidewalk or superstructure elevations to make all risers
6" tall.
c) The preferred number of risers in a flight of stairs is 14 to 16. The
maximum number is 19.
8) The rails shall be detailed with regard to the following:
a) Pedestrian railings must be at least 3'-6" in height.
b) Bicycle railings must be at least 4'-6" in height.
c) For pedestrian bridges over roadways, the opening between
elements of a pedestrian railing shall not permit a 4" sphere to
pass through.
d) For pedestrian bridges that are not over roadways, the opening
between elements of a pedestrian railing shall not permit a 4"
sphere to pass through the lower 27" of the railing. A 6" sphere
shall not be able to pass through any opening above 27".
e) Handrails shall be placed 2'-8" above the top of the deck.
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
2-48
9) Provide an electrical ground for continuous chain link fences,

ornamental railings, and metal handrails. If appropriate, provide
bicycle ramps on pedestrian bridges that contain stairs.
Materials
The superstructure of a pedestrian bridge shall be steel, prestressed
concrete, reinforced concrete, or timber. Aluminum is not an acceptable
material for use in any portion of the superstructure.
The minimum structural steel thickness is 1/4 inch for pipe or tube
sections and 5/16 inch for all other sections. The minimum thickness
requirements do not apply to railings. Details associated with structural
tubing shall be watertight or designed such that moisture cannot be
trapped in or on the member to accelerate corrosion.
The concrete for the deck of a pedestrian bridge shall be Mn/DOT Mix
No. 3Y33 or 3Y33A.
The Brazilian hardwood known as IPE, though very durable, is not an
accepted decking material on state or federally funded projects. If the
use of IPE wood is desired by the owner, it shall be paid for by local
funds.
Bridge Substructure
The bridge substructure shall be reinforced concrete supported on piling
or spread footings as recommended in the Bridge Construction Unit
Foundation Recommendations report.
Incorporate drainage systems
(Details B910 or B911) into the abutments as needed.
Bridge Superstructure
Bearing assemblies shall be elastomeric pads or masonry plates.
other types will require approval by the Bridge Design Engineer.
All
To limit transverse deck cracking due to negative flexure, provide

additional longitudinal bars in the top of the deck over the piers. Stagger
the ends of the additional longitudinal bars to transition the capacity of
the section. (See Figure 9.2.3.5.)
Detail anchorages for the piers and abutments to resist uplift and
overturning forces associated with wind loads.
Provide a cover plate over all pedestrian bridge expansion joint openings
to protect pedestrians from a tripping hazard.
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
2-49
Type 5.0 strip seals with expansion joint openings up to 5.0 inches are
allowed on pedestrian bridges since the joint is concealed by a cover
plate.
Highway Geometrics
A pedestrian bridge over a roadway shall meet Mn/DOT design standards
for horizontal and vertical clearances.
2.4.1.3 Temporary
Bridges and
Widenings
Temporary Bridges
Temporary bridges are used to detour traffic while removal of an existing
bridge and construction of a new bridge occur on the mainline of the
roadway. The superstructure consists of a glue-laminated wood panel
deck on steel or prestressed beams. Substructures typically are pile bent
structures with steel pile caps.
Design temporary bridges in accordance with the LRFD Specifications
using the HL-93 live load with an associated load factor of 1.75.
The posted speed for work zones is 45 mph. Per LRFD 13.7.2, design the
railings, the railing/deck connection, and the deck overhang on
temporary bridges to meet railing Test Level 2.
Temporary Widenings
Temporary widening occurs when staging requires widening of an existing
bridge while construction of an adjacent new bridge occurs.
Design structural components of the temporary widening to meet or
exceed the capacity of the existing bridge components.
The deck
material of the widening shall match the deck material of the existing
bridge.
For temporary widenings, design the railings, the railing/deck connection,
and the deck overhang to meet the railing test level required for the
roadway.
FEBRUARY 2007
2.4.1.4 Bridge
Approaches
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
2-50
In most cases, the bridge approach panel will be included with the
roadway grading plans for a project. For situations where approach panel
details cant be wrapped into roadway plans, guidance for the treatment
and details of approach panels can be found in the following:
Bridge Approach Treatment
The approach treatment standard sheets describe the limits and
treatment of excavation and backfill near the abutments. These
sheets are found in the Mn/DOT Standard Plans Manual, Figures
5-297.233 and 5-297.234.
Bridge Approach Panel
The standard sheets covering bridge approach panels are found in the
Mn/DOT Standard Plans Manual, Figures 5-297.223 through
5-297.232.
These figures cover standard approach panels for
abutments with joints, abutments without joints, abutments with
different amounts of skew, different mainline pavement types, and
miscellaneous details.
A special design for approach panels is
required when a bridge has a skew angle equal to or greater than 45.
Specify a concrete wearing course on approach panels when the bridge
deck has a concrete wearing course.
The wearing course on the
approach panels will be placed at the same time as the wearing course on
the bridge. Include the approach panel wearing course quantity in the
summary of quantities for the superstructure. When using integral
abutments, provide approach panel detail to roadway design for inclusion
into the roadway plans.
2.4.1.5 Survey
When assembling the survey sheets for final plans, verify that the most
current grading plans are being used.
The final design survey sheets should contain the centerlines and object
lines for the abutment and pier footings.
All test piles should be
identified and located.
2.4.1.6 Utilities
The Utilities Unit determines if provision must be made for lighting

(roadway, navigation, inspection, etc.), signing, signals, utilities, etc.
If no current utilities are required to be carried on a bridge, provide
details in the abutments for a future conduit system for all Mn/DOT
bridges with beam superstructures. Provide a clear passageway to install
one future 4 inch diameter conduit on one side of the bridge between the
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
2-51
fascia and first interior beams. For twin bridges, allow for a conduit in
the outside bay of both bridges. The provisions for the future conduit
include a 6 inch diameter PVC pipe sleeve block-out with cap in the
parapet wall at each abutment. All other hardware such as hangers,
inserts, etc. will be the responsibility of the utility that utilizes the
block-outs.
The conduit for utilities is to be suspended below the deck on hanger
systems between the beams. Locate the entire conduit and hanger
system above the bottom of the beams and generally below the
diaphragms or in the lower openings of a cross frame diaphragm. To
minimize the impact to the structure in the future, avoid casting conduits
for utility companies in the deck, sidewalk, or rail.
Roadway lighting conduit (11/2 inch diameter maximum) will be allowed
in rails and sidewalks.
When conduit is embedded in concrete rail, deck, or sidewalk, use a
combination expansion/deflection fitting at the abutments. This will
accommodate horizontal movements (due to temperature change, creep,
shrinkage, etc.) and vertical movements (due to jacking operations for
bearing replacement, etc.).
For hanging systems, only an expansion fitting is required at the
abutments. Hangers and conduit can accommodate vertical deflection
(due to superstructure jacking) at the abutment. Lateral bracing of
conduit is needed only for fiberglass conduit.
The temperature
movements of rigid steel conduit approximate those of concrete.
Consequently, lateral bracing is not needed.
Choose a transverse
spacing for the conduits that permits proper placement of concrete
between embedded anchors.
To ensure the integrity of substructure units, the following restrictions
should be included in all permits to install utilities near bridge structures
supported on spread footings:
1) No soils shall be disturbed below a line extending from the bottom of
the footing horizontally for a distance of 3 feet from the edge of the
footing and then continuing downwards and outward on a 1:2 slope.
2) Any water, sanitary sewer, or storm lines that are within 50 feet of
the edge of any spread footings shall be cased unless the elevation of
the line is 15 feet or more above or 50 feet below the footing
elevation. Storm sewer lines that are impractical to case shall be
placed outside the 50 foot line.
FEBRUARY 2007
2.4.1.7 Precedence
of Construction
Documents
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
2-52
Designers, while striving to produce accurate error-free construction

documents, may at times end up with documents that have conflicting
content. A hierarchy has been established to determine which content is
governing for a project.
In general, the more project specific the
document, the higher the documents position in the hierarchy.
Section 1504 of the Standard Specifications for Construction describes
the precedence of construction documents for a project:
In case of discrepancy, calculated dimensions will govern over scaled
dimensions; Special Provisions will govern over Standard and
supplemental Specifications and Plans, Plans will govern over
Standard and supplemental Specifications, and supplemental
Specifications will govern over Standard Specifications.
2.4.1.8 Design
Calculation
Requirements
Office practice is to permit the limit states to be exceeded by a maximum

of 3%. However, caution should be exercised to ensure that a 3%
exceeded limit state at a particular location does not adversely affect the
structure load rating.
2.4.2 Final Plans
The plan order shall typically follow this list:

General Plan, Elevation, Cross section
Pay Items
Staging Plan
Working Point Layout
Removal Details
Abutment Details and Reinforcement
Pier Details and Reinforcement
Framing Plan
Beam Details
Superstructure Details and Reinforcement
Plan Details (Railing, Expansion Joint, Slope Paving, Conduit, etc.)
B-Details
As-Built Bridge Data
Surveys, etc.
When presenting geometric information, enough baseline information
needs to be provided to permit others to verify the information
presented. For example, the top of roadway elevations presented on a
bridge layout sheet can be confirmed by others using vertical curve
information on the general elevation and the cross slopes provided on the
typical transverse section.
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
2-53
In general, the same dimensions should not be presented several times.

Providing dimensions in multiple locations increases the chance that not
all dimensions will be updated as changes occur during the design
process.
The clarity of the details used in plan sets should be a primary concern of
designers. Only the simplest details should combine the presentation of
concrete geometry and reinforcement. In most cases there is less
confusion if two details are used, one to convey concrete geometry and a
second to identify and locate reinforcement.
All sheets (except survey sheets) shall show the initials of the individuals
responsible for the design, drafting, design check, and drafting check of
each sheet. Similarly, all sheets (except survey sheets) must be certified
by a Professional Engineer licensed in the State of Minnesota.
If plan sheets containing standards (Standard Bridge Details Part I and
Part II, or Bridge Standard Plans) are changed (other than simply filling
in blanks), place the word MODIFIED under the B-Detail or Figure
Number. Also add a box containing a note which states what was
modified to help plan readers quickly locate them.
In most cases, details are presented with stationing increasing as one
moves from the left side to the right side of the sheet. Always include a
north arrow on plan views. Plan views are typically oriented with north
arrows pointing toward the top or to the right of the sheet. Stationing
increases for northbound and eastbound traffic.
2.4.2.1 Drafting
Standards
The Bridge Office has adopted standards to be used when drafting plan
sheets. Download Summary of Recommended Drafting Standards from
the link (Mn/DOT CADD Requirements and CADD Resources) posted at:
http://www.dot.state.mn.us/bridge/.
2.4.2.2 Drafting
Guidelines
Sheet Layout and Continuity

Read plans from a contractors perspective to check that they contain all
information needed to build the bridge. Make sure enough dimensions
are given for constructibility. Use extra details for uncommon work. Use
perspective views when clarity is needed.
Use sheets efficiently. Balance the drawings on sheets to avoid one
sheet being empty while another is crowded. Use additional sheets, as
needed, to avoid crowding details on sheets. Make sure that details,
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
2-54
data, and other information given on more than one sheet agree between
sheets. Avoid unnecessary repetition of details and notes.
Large-scale corner details are required for all skewed bridges and for
other complex corners.
Round dimensions to the nearest 1/8 of an inch.
Note and dimension bar splices.
Cross-referencing sheets to details is recommended.
Use bill of reinforcement tables for all but very minor reinforced concrete
work. Do not enlarge details (such as rebar bends) just to fill up space.
Referencing bar bend details by letter to various generic shapes should
never be used.
Keep details together for abutments, piers, superstructure, etc.
For abutments, piers, and other complex drawings, use different views
and sections to separate dimensions and reinforcement.
Place pile design loads and notes pertaining to a particular substructure
on the sheet that contains the footing plan view.
For bridges with numerous footings and curved alignment, a separate
foundation layout drawing is recommended.
If the plan contains numerous variable dimensions and other data
(especially for framing plans and beams), make use of tables to keep this
data in order.
On the Framing Plan, show bearing type beside each bearing point
instead of lines and arrows, which tend to clutter the drawing.
For simple beam spans (prestressed beams, etc.), dimension beam
spacing at pier cap along centerline of the pier(s). Include supplemental
dimensions along centerline of bearing for curved and flared structures.
On jobs with staged construction, use enough drawings to clearly indicate
how the bridge construction is to be coordinated with the staging. Keep
structure units together. Reinforcement and quantity tabulations are to
be split between stages.
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
2-55
On rehabilitation jobs, clearly indicate cut lines and extent of all

removals. If there is a saw cut, be sure to use a straight line (WT=5). If
elevations are taken off original plans, note as such and require the
contractor to verify elevations in the field.
When it appears that plan notes, such as procedure descriptions,
specifications, etc., will become excessively wordy relegate these notes
to the special provisions.
List general notes first and specific numbered notes last. Specific detail
notes should be numbered with circles and referenced to the detail to
which they apply. Place all notes together on the right hand side of the
sheet.
Leave extra lines in the Summary of Quantities and Bill of Reinforcement
for additions. Also, leave extra space in the list of notes.
Use the words will and shall correctly. Will refers to the portion of
work to be performed by the owner (Mn/DOT). Shall refers to the
portion of work to be performed by the Contractor. Shall may also be
thought of as a directive to the Contractor.
Pay Quantities
Make computations neat and readable. Strive for continuity. These
computations may be needed for future reference and the reader must be
able to interpret them.
Box in or underline computation totals for quicker take off. Initial, date,
and put the bridge (or job) number on every computation sheet.
Two sets of independently worked quantity computations are required for
each pay item.
Arrange design and quantity computations into a neat and orderly
package.
FEBRUARY 2007
2.4.2.3 General
Plan and Elevation
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
2-56
The General Plan and Elevation sheet is intended to summarize the

primary features and horizontal geometry of the bridge. Figure 2.4.2.3.1
shows an example General Plan and Elevation sheet and Figure 2.4.2.3.2
shows a Typical Cross Section sheet with pay items.
Plan
On the plan view identify the following: working points, working line,
centerlines, bench mark disks, utilities, location of inplace bridges or
substructures, ditch drains, deck drains, lights, and name plate. Label
the following: span lengths, deck width, size of angles between the
working line and centerlines, horizontal curves, minimum horizontal
clearance to substructure units, point of minimum vertical clearance for
each roadway under the bridge, extent of slope protection, roadway
stationing and elevations, and distance between twin bridges. Provide a
north arrow.
Tie bridge dimensions to working points.
Show the
direction of traffic for each design lane.
Elevation
Present the primary vertical geometry of the bridge on the elevation
view. This consists of vertical curve data, end slopes, existing ground
lines, footing elevations, limits of excavation, grading notes, ditch clean
out along railroad tracks, and scale. Label bearings as fixed, expansion,
or integral. Also label piers, spans, abutments, and slope protection.
For bridges over waterways, hydraulic information must be provided.
Required information includes:
channel bottom width, low member
elevation, design high water elevation, and assumed flowline elevation.
For grade separation bridges, provide the minimum vertical and
horizontal clearances. In addition, provide the dimension from centerline
of pier to toe of slope protection. If there is no side pier, give the
dimension from toe of slope to centerline of roadway. Dimension the
pier, lane, and shoulder widths on the roadway under. Lane slopes on
the roadway under are typically omitted, but can be provided if space
permits.
When illustrating slope protection use a straight slope line; do not follow
the ditch radius curve. To reduce confusion concerning slopes, do not
show slopes as 1:2. Many individuals are unsure of whether the first or
second number is the horizontal part of the slope. Show the slopes
graphically. Where slopes need to be provided in text, explicitly call out
the slopes (e.g., 1 vertical to 2 horizontal).
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
2-57
Typical Cross Section

The typical cross section is the third general view of the structure.
Combined with the general plan and elevation views, the primary
geometry of the bridge should be conveyed. On the typical cross section
show transverse bridge dimensions, lane widths and slopes, beam depth
and spacing for all spans, roadway slab and concrete wearing course
thicknesses, type of railing, medians, sidewalks, profile grade location,
working line, and all centerlines.
For staged construction projects, include the inplace, interim, and final
cross sections with anchored safety barrier locations.
For complex projects, consider creating a separate plan sheet for pay
items and notes for clarity.
Utilities
Show all utilities that may affect bridge construction. Note what is to be
done with them (will they be moved, will they no longer be used or do
they need to be protected during construction).
Miscellaneous
Provide a Design Data block on the General Plan and Elevation Sheet of
the bridge plan set. The information given in the block provides a
summary of the primary parameters used for the design. Information in
the Design Data block includes: design specifications, design method,
design live load, design material strengths, future wearing course
assumed in the design, deck area, traffic data, and the operating rating
for the new structure.
Also on this sheet, identify the governing standard specifications for
construction. Show a north arrow on the plan view and include a block
for engineering certification. Present applicable project numbers on the
first sheet; project numbers depend on specific funding sources, so there
may be both state and federal project numbers.
Review the title block to ensure it accurately describes the bridge. Within
the title block provide span lengths to the nearest foot and the bridge
type identification number. The three-character identification number
should follow the numbering scheme provided in Appendix 2-A.
Include any additional standard construction notes and the sheet list for
the plan set on the first sheet of the plan set. Provide the schedule of
quantities for the entire bridge in tabular form on the second or third
sheet of the plan.
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
2-58
Standard practice for placement of bench marks and bridge nameplates is

as follows: Place a single nameplate on the southeast corner of the
bridge for a roadway running north and south. For a roadway running
east and west, provide the nameplate at the northeast corner. On twin
bridges place a nameplate on each right hand corner approaching bridge.
For railroad and pedestrian bridges, place the nameplate on a
substructure unit. On reconstructed bridges, install a new nameplate
with the original year completed and the year the bridge was renovated.
Place a bench mark disk on the southeast corner of each bridge. If the
bridge is over 250 feet in length, or if there is an elevation difference of
more than 10 feet, place a second bench mark disk on the bridge. Place
the second disk in the northeast corner for roadways running north and
south and in the southwest corners for roadways running east and west.
Check if ditch drainage pipe is necessary for the project. If drainage pipe
is necessary and the contract has multiple portions (grading, bridge,
etc.), identify which portion of the contract contains the pipe. Label ditch
drainage pipe on plan and elevation views.
Concrete or aggregate slope protection is used along a highway or
railway (grade separation structures). Aggregate slope protection is used
more frequently when pedestrian traffic below the bridge is limited.
Stream crossings use riprap slope protection supported on a granular or
geotextile filter. The Preliminary Bridge Plan will indicate the type of
slope protection to be used.
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 2.4.2.3.1
General Plan and Elevation
2-59
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 2.4.2.3.2
Typical Cross Section
2-60
FEBRUARY 2007
2.4.2.4 Bridge
Layout and Staking
Plan
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
2-61
The Bridge Layout Sheet is used by surveyors to locate the bridge in

space with its primary geometry. The primary geometry consists of
centerline of roadway(s) and centerline of substructure bearings.
Working points are located on substructure bearing centerlines where
they are intersected by fascia beam lines and working lines. By providing
stationing, X-coordinates, and Y-coordinates for each of the working
points, the position of the bridge can be fixed. Figure 2.4.2.4.1 contains
an example.
In Figure 2.4.2.4.1 the working line and its azimuth are labeled. Also
shown is the angle of intersection between the working line and each of
the substructure units and roadways under the bridge. As a primary
geometry line, the working line should be labeled throughout plan set.
Place the control point at the intersection of the survey line and
centerline of cross road, track etc. For river crossings, place the control
point at an abutment centerline of bearing. Label the control point with
its coordinates. Coordinates of the control point and the working points
should be given to three decimals of a foot. Tie the working point layout
to the control point. Present dimensions in feet (a note on the sheet
should say the same).
List the coordinates for all working points in a table labeled
DIMENSIONS BETWEEN WORKING POINTS. Stations and the distances
between working points should be presented to the nearest 0.01 foot.
Coordinates are assumed to be State Plane coordinates. If another
system is used, place a note on the sheet identifying the system used.
In addition to horizontal geometry, a limited amount of vertical geometry
is provided on the Bridge Layout Sheet. The vertical geometry consists
of elevations and drops. The elevation at the top of roadway and the
bridge seat is provided for all working points located on beam lines and is
appended to the DIMENSIONS BETWEEN WORKING POINTS table.
Drop or elevation difference information is provided for each substructure
unit. Drop information is summarized in the TOP OF ROADWAY TO
BRIDGE SEAT table. The table should contain the following items:
1) Deck Thickness
2) Stool Height
3) Beam Height
4) Bearing Height
5) Total Height
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
2-62
If the drop dimension is the same for all beam lines, provide a single
value for each substructure unit.
If the drop dimensions vary at
substructure locations, provide a value for each beam line. Total values
should be given in both inches and decimals of a foot to two places.
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 2.4.2.4.1
Bridge Layout
2-63
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
2-64
2.4.2.5 Standard
Abbreviations
Use standard abbreviations to clarify information on plan sets and reduce

the clutter on a crowded plan sheet. Appendix 2-C presents a list of
standard abbreviations that can be utilized in a plan.
Define
abbreviations used in a plan set on the sheet where they are used or as
part of a General Notes sheet.
2.4.2.6 Inclusion
of Standard Bridge
Details in Plan Sets
There are two parts to the Bridge Details: Part I and Part II. They have
been
published
on
the
Bridge
Office
Web
site
at:
http://www.dot.state.mn.us/bridge/ . Bridge details are intended, where
applicable, to be incorporated into a set of bridge plans. The Bridge
Details Part I is usually called B-Details. The details are presented in a
portrait orientation on an 8 1/2" x 11" sheet. Available B-Details are
listed in Appendix 2-D. The 100 series contains nameplate details, the
200 series has pile splices, the 300 series has bearing details, and the
400 series has a variety of steel superstructure/diaphragm/cross frame
details. A slab protection plate is provided in Detail B553. The 700
series contains floor drain details and the 800 series contains
joint/diaphragm/railing details. Miscellaneous details are collected in the
900 series.
Bridge Details Part II is listed in Appendix 2-E. These details occupy an
entire plan sheet. The majority of these details are for railings, parapets,
medians, and prestressed concrete beams.
2.4.2.7 Use of
Bridge Standard
Plans
Similar to Bridge Details Part II, Bridge Standard Plans are intended to be
incorporated into bridge plan sets and occupy an entire plan sheet. The
information presented may be much more in-depth as the information for
multiple designs is presented on a single sheet. An example is retaining
walls; designs for a number of retained earth heights are presented on a
single sheet.
Bridge Standard Plans consist of culverts and retaining walls. Appendix
2-F lists available culvert standards. Retaining wall standards are listed
in Appendix 2-G.
2.4.2.8 Standard
Plan Notes
Similar to other plan elements, standard plan notes have been prepared
to increase the consistency of information presented on final design
plans. Plan notes serve a variety of purposes; they communicate design
criteria, specific construction requirements, and a variety of notes
pertaining to the construction or fabrication of specific bridge elements.
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
2-65
Appendix 2-H contains the Standard Plan Notes. These notes have been
grouped into the following categories:
Design Data
Construction Notes
Drainage and Erosion Control
Excavation and Earthwork
Reinforcement
Piling and Footings
Materials, Fabrication and Erection
Concrete Pours
Welded Steel Bearing Assemblies
Cutting and Removal of Old Concrete
Joints and Joint Sealer
Timber Bridges
Miscellaneous
Designers unfamiliar with Mn/DOTs Standard Plan Notes should review
the list prior to beginning final design. Reviewing the notes prior to
design will familiarize designers with the material properties to be used,
and other constraints typically placed on construction. A second review
of the notes should be performed at the end of design to ensure that all
applicable notes were incorporated into the plan set.
2.4.2.9 Quantity
Notes and Pay
Items
Standard Summary of Quantities Notes

During construction, contractors are compensated according to the work
they complete. The value of the work completed is identified when the
contractor submits their bid. For each work item or pay item the
contractor must supply a price. The pay items are coordinated with
specifications and special provisions. To clarify what is included in a
specific pay item, the Bridge Office has assembled a Standard Summary
of Quantity Notes. Like other plan elements, these notes help ensure
uniformity across plan sets and permit Mn/DOT to generate a historical
price database that can be used to estimate the cost of future bridges.
The Standard Summary of Quantities Notes for bridge projects is listed in
Appendix 2-I.
Pay Items
A list of Standard Pay Items is provided in Appendix 2-J. Items for which
payment to the contractor will be based on plan quantities are identified
with a (P) as an appendix to the item label.
Miscellaneous
Round off quantities to the nearest pay item unit except for the following:
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
2-66
Earth excavation to nearest 10 cubic yards.

Reinforcement bars and structural metal to nearest 10 pounds.
Piling lengths to nearest 5 feet.
When computing small bituminous quantities use the following:

Wearing course = 110 pounds / square yard / inch thickness
Shoulder or Wearing Course 6.5%
0.065 (thickness in inches) (110 pounds) = ___ pounds / sq. yard
Tack Coat = 0.03 gallons / square yard
Binder or Base Course 5.3%
0.053 (thickness in inches) (110 pounds) = ____ pounds / sq. yard
Deck area shall be computed (rounded to the nearest square foot) by
multiplying the transverse out-to-out bridge width by the longitudinal
end-of-deck to end-of-deck distance. (Do not include bridge approach
panels or paving brackets.)
2.4.3 Revised
Sheets
Sometimes, revisions to the plan are required after the letting due to an
error found in the plan or other issues that arise during construction.
When this occurs, use the following procedure:
1) Make the necessary revisions to the sheet in the electronic file and
add a revision block that includes a description of the revision. (See
Figure 2.4.3.1.)
2) Plot and certify the revised sheet.
3) Draft a transmittal letter from the Bridge Design Engineer to the
Resident Engineer in the district construction office. Submit the letter
and the revised sheet to the Bridge Design Engineer for distribution.
Figure 2.4.3.1
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
2-67
2.5 Reconstruction
Guidelines and
Details
Typical details for the reconstruction of railings, superstructure joints,

and pavement joints are presented in this section.
2.5.1
Superstructure
[Future manual content]
2.5.1.1 Railings
The following figures show typical details for railing reconstruction:

Figure 2.5.1.1.1
One-Line Railing Reconstruction on Existing Deck
Figure 2.5.1.1.2
F-Railing Reconstruction on Existing Deck
Figure 2.5.1.1.1
Railings
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 2.5.1.1.2
Railings
2-68
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
2-69
2.5.1.2 Wearing
Course
2.5.1.3
Expansion/Fixed
Joints
The following figures show typical details for the reconstruction of

expansion joints and fixed joints:
Figure 2.5.1.3.1
Reconstruct Expansion Joint Type A
Figure 2.5.1.3.2
Reconstruct Expansion Joint Type B
Figure 2.5.1.3.3
Reconstruct Expansion Joint Type C
Figure 2.5.1.3.4
Reconstruct Expansion Joint Type D
Figure 2.5.1.3.5
Reconstruct Expansion Joint Type D
Figure 2.5.1.3.6
Reconstruct Expansion Joint Type E
Figure 2.5.1.3.7
Reconstruct Expansion Joint Type F
Figure 2.5.1.3.8
Reconstruct Expansion Joint Type X
Figure 2.5.1.3.9
Reconstruct Expansion Joint Type X
Figure 2.5.1.3.10 Reconstruct Fixed Joint Type A
Figure 2.5.1.3.11 Reconstruct Fixed Joint Type A
Expansion/Fixed Joint Reconstruction Pay Items
Item No. 2433.603 Reconstruct Expansion Joint, Type ____, Lin. Ft.
Type A Replace sliding plate or inplace waterproof device with
new waterproof joint.
Type B Slab over parapet and contraction type abutments
replace joint with waterproof joint at same location.
Type C Slab over parapet, replace joint with waterproof joint at
front of parapet.
Type D Replace cork joint at pier with waterproof joint.
Type E Replace joint at hinge with waterproof joint.
Type F Replace finger joints with waterproof joint or raise device
and place a waterproof trough.
Type X Evazote material joint.
Type Special None of the above or a combination of the above.
Item No. 2433.603 Reconstruct Fixed Joint, Type ____, Lin. Ft.
Type A Eliminate inplace joint
Type B Install waterstop
Type Special None of the above
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 2.5.1.3.1
Expansion Joints
2-70
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 2.5.1.3.2
Expansion Joints
2-71
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 2.5.1.3.3
Expansion Joints
2-72
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 2.5.1.3.4
Expansion Joints
2-73
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 2.5.1.3.5
Expansion Joints
2-74
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 2.5.1.3.6
Expansion Joints
2-75
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 2.5.1.3.7
Expansion Joints
2-76
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 2.5.1.3.8
Expansion Joints
2-77
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 2.5.1.3.9
Expansion Joints
2-78
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 2.5.1.3.10
Fixed Joints
2-79
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 2.5.1.3.11
Fixed Joints
2-80
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
2.5.2 Substructure
2.5.2.1 Abutments
2.5.2.2 Piers
2.5.3 Pavement
The following
reconstruction:
Figure 2.5.3.1
Figure 2.5.3.2
Figure 2.5.3.3
Figure 2.5.3.4
Figure 2.5.3.5
figures
show
Reconstruct
Reconstruct
Reconstruct
Reconstruct
Reconstruct
typical
Pavement
Pavement
Pavement
Pavement
Pavement
2-81
details
Joint
Joint
Joint
Joint
Joint
for
Type
Type
Type
Type
Type
pavement
joint
A
B
C
Special
Special
Pavement Joint Reconstruction Pay Items

Item No. 2433.603 Reconstruct Pavement Joint, Type ____, Lin. Ft.
Type A Approach panel or roadway, remove inplace protection
angles and compression seals and recast concrete. (Eliminate
Joint.)
Type B Approach panel, replace inplace joint or crack with
concrete sill and 4" relief joint.
Type C Remove protection angles and replace with roadway
joint.
Type Special None of the above or a combination of the above.
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 2.5.3.1
Pavement Joints
2-82
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 2.5.3.2
Pavement Joints
2-83
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 2.5.3.3
Pavement Joints
2-84
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 2.5.3.4
Pavement Joints
2-85
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 2.5.3.5
Pavement Joints
2-86
FEBRUARY 2007
2.6 Construction
Requirements
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
2-87
Mn/DOTs general practices and guidelines for the construction of bridges

are presented in Mn/DOTs Bridge Construction Manual. The manual
number is 5-393. It contains sections on:
.050
Preparation of Foundation and Backfill
.100
Pile Driving
.150
Falsework and Forms
.200
Metal Reinforcement
.250
Concrete Bridge Construction
.300
Timber Construction
.350
Steel Construction
.400
Surface Preparation and Painting Structural Steel
.650
Slope Protection
.700
Construction on Railroad Right-of-Way
The contract documents for the project shall explicitly state the required
submittals and the qualifications of the individuals responsible for the
preparation of falsework and other submittals.
Falsework and forms are to be designed in accordance with the AASHTO
Guide Design Specifications for Bridge Temporary Works. Falsework
submittals shall meet the requirements of Bridge Special Provision
No. BS2ME-2401.2.
Submittals describing proposed temporary shoring for works adjacent to
railroad tracks require approval by the railroad.
The details or specifics of a temporary shoring design are to be detailed
in the plans with consideration given to the domestic availability of the
materials used. Frequently, showing the location of the sheeting and the
minimum required section modulus is sufficient. However, designers
should satisfy themselves that adequate clearances have been provided
for at least one reasonable shoring scheme for staged construction
projects. If more complex details are required, they must be provided in
the plans. See Sections 11.3.7 and 11.3.8 for more guidance.
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
2-88
APPENDIX 2-A
BRIDGE TYPE NUMBERS
MINNESOTA BRIDGE TYPE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (3 characters)
First Digit
Second & Third Digits
(Material)
(Bridge Type)
Concrete
01
Beam Span
Concrete Continuous
02
Low Truss
Steel
03
High Truss
Steel Continuous
04
Deck Truss
Prestress
05
Thru Girder
Prestress Continuous
06
Deck Girder
Timber
07
Box Girder
Masonry
08
Rigid Frame
Wrought or Cast Iron
09
Slab Span
Other
10
Slab Span-Voided
Aluminum
11
Channel Span
Post Tensioned
12
Arch
13
Box Culvert
14
Pipe Culvert (Round)
15
Pipe Arch
16
Long Span
17
Tunnel
18
Movable
19
Other
20
Double Tee
21
Quad Tee
22
Bulb Tee
23
Suspension
24
Tied Arch
EXAMPLES
BRIDGE TYPE
ID NUMBER
Continuous Concrete Multiple Box Girders
207
Simple Span Concrete Slab
109
Tunnel in Rock
017
Prestressed Beam Span
501 approach span
Steel Continuous Beam Span
401 main span
Concrete Channel Span
111
Note: A bridge may have one identification number for main span
and another number for approach span.
span and approach span accordingly.
Identify main
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
2-89
APPENDIX 2-B *
SPECIAL PROVISIONS 2005 SPEC. BOOK
TABLE OF CONTENTS
NO.
TITLE
SB2005-1
INDEX (COMBINED)
SB2005-1
BRIDGE PLANS
SB2005-1508
(1508) CONSTRUCTION STAKES, LINES, AND GRADES
SB2005-1706
(1706) EMPLOYEE HEALTH AND WELFARE
SB2005-1707
(1707) CONST. OPERATIONS ADJACENT TO RDWYS.
SB2005-1709
(1709) NAVIGABLE WATERWAYS
SB2005-1717
(1717) AIR, LAND AND WATER POLLUTION
SB2005-1803
(1803) PROSECUTION OF WORK
SB2005-1807.1
(1807) FAILURE TO COMPLETE WORK ON TIME
SB2005-1807.2
(1807) FAILURE TO COMPLETE WORK ON TIME
SB2005-2104
(2104) REMOVAL OF REGULATED WASTE (BRIDGE)
SB2005-2105
BRIDGE ABUTMENT CONSTRUCTION
SB2005-2301
BRIDGE APPROACH PANELS
SB2005-2360
PLANT MIXED ASPHALT PAVEMENT
SB2005-2401
(2401) CONCRETE BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION
SB2005-2401.1
Concrete Aggregate for Bridges
SB2005-2401.2
Falsework and Forms and Bridge Slab Placement
SB2005-2401.3
Beam Tie Downs for Slab Construction
SB2005-2401.4
Bridge Slab
SB2005-2401.5
Placement of Concrete in High Abutments
SB2005-2401.6
Slipforming of Bridge Railing Prohibited
SB2005-2401.7
Placement of Concrete (District 8 only)
SB2005-2401.8
Bridge Slabs (not for Metro)
SB2005-2401.9
Joint Filler and Sealing
SB2005-2401.10
Architectural Concrete Texture
SB2005-2401.11
Finish of Concrete
SB2005-2401.12
Finish of Concrete
SB2005-2401.13
Finish of Inplace Concrete
SB2005-2401.14
BLANK
SB2005-2401.15
BLANK
SB2005-2401.16
BLANK
SB2005-2401.17
BLANK
SB2005-2401.18
Roadway Finish of Bridge Slabs
SB2005-2401.19
BLANK
SB2005-2401.20
Curing Bridge Deck Slabs
* Refer to http://www.dot.state.mn.us/bridge/ for current Bridge Special Provisions
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
2-90
APPENDIX 2-B * (Continued)

TABLE OF CONTENTS
NO.
TITLE
SB2005-2401.21
POST TENSIONING SYSTEM
SB2005-2401.22
Curing Bridge Structural Slab
SB2005-2401.23
Integral Concrete Diaphragms
SB2005-2402
(2402) STEEL BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION
SB2005-2402.1
BLANK
SB2005-2402.2
Dimensional Tolerances
SB2005-2402.3
Fracture Critical Steel Bridge Members
SB2005-2402.4
Expansion Joint Devices
SB2005-2402.5
Modular Bridge Joint System
SB2005-2402.6
Metal Railing
SB2005-2402.7
POT BEARING ASSEMBLIES
SB2005-2402.8
BLANK
SB2005-2402.9
Existing Cover Plate Weld Inspection
SB2005-2402.10
Bolted Connections
SB2005-2403
(2403) TIMBER BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION
SB2005-2404
(2404) CONCRETE WEARING COURSE FOR BRIDGES
SB2005-2404.1
Concrete Wearing Course 3U17A
SB2005-2404.2
Concrete Wearing Course 3U17A
SB2005-2404.3
Roadway Finish of Bridge Slabs
SB2005-2405
(2405) PRESTRESSED CONCRETE BEAMS
SB2005-2405.1
Prestressed Concrete Fabricator Certification
SB2005-2405.2
Steel Intermediate Diaphragms
SB2005-2405.3
Concrete Finish of Exterior Beams
SB2005-2405.4
Prestress Transfer
SB2005-2433
(2433) STRUCTURE RENOVATION
SB2005-2433.1
Structure Removals
SB2005-2433.2
Remove Concrete Bridge Deck
SB2005-2433.3
Anchorages
SB2005-2433.4
Grouted Anchorages
SB2005-2433.5
BRIDGE SURFACE SEALER
SB2005-2433.6
Removal of Existing Steel Members
SB2005-2442
(2442) REMOVAL OF EXISTING BRIDGES
SB2005-2451
(2451) STRUCTURE EXCAVATIONS AND BACKFILLS
SB2005-2451.1
Structure Excavation
SB2005-2451.2
Aggregate Backfill
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
2-91
APPENDIX 2-B * (Continued)

TABLE OF CONTENTS
NO.
TITLE
SB2005-2451.3
Foundation Backfill
SB2005-2451.4
Foundation Preparation (Pier Nos. __________)
SB2005-2451.5
Foundation Preparation (Pier Nos. __________)
SB2005-2451.6
Foundation Exploration
SB2005-2451.7
Foundation Preparation for Pile Bent Pier(s) -- Bridge No(s).___________
SB2005-2452
(2452) PILING
SB2005-2452.1
Pile Authorization
SB2005-2452.2
Equipment for Driving
SB2005-2452.3
Pile Tip Protection
SB2005-2452.4
Pile Points
SB2005-2452.5
BLANK
SB2005-2452.6
Pile Load Test
SB2005-2452.7
Dynamic Monitoring of Pile Driving
SB2005-2452.8
Substitution for Steel H-Piling
SB2005-2452.9
Substitution for Steel H-Piling Prohibited
SB2005-2452.10
BLANK
SB2005-2452.11
Extensions and Splices
SB2005-2453
(2453) DRILLED SHAFT CONSTRUCTION
SB2005-2461
(2461) STRUCTURAL CONCRETE
SB2005-2471
(2471) STRUCTURAL METALS
SB2005-2476.1
METHODS FOR PAINT REMOVAL AND WASTE DISPOSAL
SB2005-2476.2
CONTAINMENT AND DISPOSAL OF WASTE MATERIALS
SB2005-2478
(2478) ORGANIC ZINC-RICH PAINT SYSTEM
SB2005-2478.1
Removal of Soluble Salts
SB2005-2479
(2479) INORGANIC ZINC-RICH PAINT SYSTEM
SB2005-2514.1
FABRIC-FORMED SLOPE PAVING
SB2005-2514.2
(2514) SLOPE PAVING
SB2005-2545
CONDUIT SYSTEMS
SB2005-2557.1
(2557) FENCING
SB2005-2557.2
(2557) FENCING
SB2005-3371
(3371) STEEL SHELLS FOR CONCRETE PILING
SB2005-3372
(3372) STEEL PILING
SB2005-3391
(3391) FASTENERS
SB2005-3471
(3471) TIMBER PILING
SB2005-3741
(3741) ELASTOMERIC BEARING PADS
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
2-92
APPENDIX 2-C
STANDARD ABBREVIATIONS
A
AASHTO ......... American Association of State

Highway and Transportation Officials
ABT. .............................................. About
ABUT. ....................................... Abutment
ADT ............................ Average Daily Traffic
ADTT ................. Average Daily Truck Traffic
ALT. .......................................... Alternate
APPR. .........................................Approach
APPROX. .... Approximate (or Approximately)
ASSY. ....................................... Assembly
AZ. ............................................. Azimuth
@ ...................................................... At
D.C. ................................ Degree of Curve

DET. ...............................................Detail
D.H.V. ..................... Design Hourly Volume
D.H.W. .......................... Design High Water
DIA. .......................................... Diameter
DIAPH. .....................................Diaphragm
DL .......................................... Dead Load
DWL. ............................................. Dowel
B
B.F. ..........................................Back Face
BIT. ........................................ Bituminous
B.M. ...................................... Bench Mark
BM ..................................................Beam
BOT. ............................................ Bottom
BR. ................................................Bridge
BRG. ............................................ Bearing
BTWN. ........................................Between
C
C & G................................ Curb and Gutter
C-I-P .................................... Cast-In-Place
CL ........................................... Centerline
CL. (or CLR.)..................................... Clear
C.M.P. ...................... Corrugated Metal Pipe
COL. ............................................ Column
COMP. ...................................... Composite
CONC. ........................................ Concrete
CONST. ................................. Construction
CONT. ................ Continuous (or Continued)
C.S.A.H. ............. County State Aid Highway
CU. ................................................. Cubic
CULV. ...........................................Culvert
E
E. ...................................................East
E.B.L. ..........................East Bound Lane(s)
E.F. .......................................... Each Face
EA. .................................................. Each
ELEV. (or EL.) .............................. Elevation
EMBED. .................................. Embedment
ENGR. .........................................Engineer
EQ. ................................................. Equal
EXP. .........................................Expansion
F
F. .......................................... Fahrenheit
F.B.M. ......................... Foot Board Measure
F.F. ......................................... Front Face
F.L. .............................................Flowline
FIN. ............................................ Finished
FIX ................................................. Fixed
FT. ......................................Foot (or Feet)
FTG. ............................................ Footing
G
G1 .......................................... Grade One
G2 .......................................... Grade Two
GA. .................................................Gage
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
2-93
APPENDIX 2-C (Continued)

H
HCADT ...........................Heavy Commercial

Average Daily Traffic
H.W. ....................................... High Water
HORIZ. .....................................Horizontal
HWY. ..........................................Highway
N. (or NO.) ....................................... North

N.B.L. ........................ North Bound Lane(s)
NO. .............................................Number
O
INPL. ........................................... Inplace

I.D. .................................. Inside Diameter
P.C. ............................... Point of curvature

P.C.C. .................. Point of compound Curve
P.G. ...................................... Profile Grade
P.I. ............................. Point of Intersection
P.O.C. ................................ Point on Curve
P.O.T. ............................. Point on Tangent
P.S.I. .....................Pounds per Square Inch
P.T. ............................... Point of Tangency
PED. ........................................ Pedestrian
PL .................................................. Plate
PRESTR. ..................................Prestressed
PROJ. ...................... Project (or Projection)
PROV. ........................................ Provision
PT. ..................................................Point
J
JCT. ............................................ Junction
JT. ................................................... Joint
K
KWY. ........................................... Keyway
L
L. ................................... Length of Curve
LL ............................................ Live Load
L.W. ........................................ Low Water
LB. ................................................ Pound
LIN. ............................................... Linear
LT. ................................................... Left
LONG. (or LONGIT.) ..................Longitudinal
M
m ..................................................Meter
mm ........................................... Millimeter
M.B.M. ...................... Thousand Board Feet
M.L. .......................................... Main Line
M.O. ................................ Maximum Offset
MAX. ......................................... Maximum
MIN. .......................................... Minimum
MISC. ..................................Miscellaneous
O.D. ...............................Outside Diameter
R
R. ............................................... Radius
R.O.W. .................................. Right of Way
R.R. ............................................ Railroad
R.S.C. .......................... Rigid Steel Conduit
RDWY. ....................................... Roadway
REINF. ...... Reinforced (or Reinforcing/ment)
REQ'D......................................... Required
REV. ............................................ Revised
RT. ................................................. Right
S
S. (or SO.) .......................................South
S.B.L. ........................South Bound Lane(s)
SEC. ............................................ Section
SDWK. ....................................... Sidewalk
SHLDR. ...................................... Shoulder
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
2-94
APPENDIX 2-C (Continued)

S (cont.)
SHT. ...............................................Sheet
SP. (or SPS.) ..................................Spaces
SPA. ............................................ Spaced
SPEC. .................. Special (or Specification)
SPG. ............................................Spacing
SQ. ...............................................Square
STA. .............................................Station
STD. .......................................... Standard
STIFF. .........................................Stiffener
STL. ................................................Steel
STR. (or STRUC.) .........................Structure
SUBGR. ..................................... Subgrade
SUPER. .............................. Superelevation
SUPERST. ........................... Superstructure
SYM. ..................................... Symmetrical
YD. .................................................. Yard
T
T & B ................................ Top and Bottom
T.H. ................................... Trunk Highway
T.T.C. .............................Tangent to Curve
TAN. ........................................... Tangent
TWP. ..........................................Township
TYP. .............................................. Typical
V
V.C. .................................... Vertical Curve
V.P.C. ................ Vertical Point of Curvature
V.P.I. .............. Vertical Point of Intersection
V.P.T. .................Vertical Point of Tangency
VAR. .............................................. Varies
VERT. .......................................... Vertical
W
W. ...................................................West
W.B.L. ........................West Bound Lane(s)
W.C. .................................Wearing Course
W.P. ................................... Working Point
W.W. ......................................... Wingwall
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN

APPENDIX 2-D*
BRIDGE DETAILS PART I (B-DETAILS)
NAME
DESCRIPTION
B101
Bridge Nameplate (For New Bridges)
B102
Bridge Nameplate (For Bridge Reconstruction)
B201
Pile Splice (Cast-In-Place Concrete Piles)
B202
Pile Splice (Steel H Bearing Piles 10" To 14")
B303
Sole Plate (Prestressed Concrete Beams) (For Bearings With Pintles)
B304
Elastomeric Fixed Bearing Assembly (Prestressed Concrete Beams)
B305
Elastomeric Expansion Bearing Pad (Prestressed Concrete Beams)
B308
Elastomeric Bearing Assembly (22" And 30" Concrete Double Tee Beams)
B310
Curved Plate Bearing Assembly (Prestressed Concrete Beams) (Fixed)
B311
Curved Plate Bearing Assembly (Prestressed Concrete Beams) (Expansion)
B312
Pot Type Bearing Assembly (Prestressed Concrete Beams)
B313
Pot Type Bearing Assembly (Prestressed Concrete Beams)
B314
Pot Type Bearing Assembly (Steel Beams) (Guided Expansion)
B315
Pot Type Bearing Assembly (Steel Beams) (Non-Guided Expansion)
B316
Pot Type Bearing Assembly (Steel Beams) (Fixed)
B354
Curved Plate Bearing Assembly (Steel Beams) (Fixed)
B355
Curved Plate Bearing Assembly (Steel Beams) (Expansion)
B400
Splices For Steel Beams (3309 Steel)
B402
Bolted Diaphragms (For Steel Beams)
B403
Steel Intermediate Diaphragm
B406
Steel Intermediate Bolted Diaphragm
B407
Cross Frame Intermediate Diaphragm (For Steel Beams)
B408
Cross Frame Intermediate Diaphragm (For Curved Steel Beams)
B410
Bolted Flange To Stiffener Detail (For Straight Steel Beams Only)
B411
Stiffener Details (For Steel Beams)
B553
Protection Plate (For End Of Slab)
(For Replacement Of Inplace Bearings Only)

(For Replacement Of Inplace Bearings Only)
(Fixed and Expansion)
(Guided Expansion)
(Non-Guided Expansion)
(For 36M - 54M, MN45 - MN63 Prestressed Concrete Beams)

(For 63" 81" Prestressed Concrete Beams)
*Refer to http://www.dot.state.mn.us/bridge/ for current Bridge CADD Standards
2-95
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN

APPENDIX 2-D* (Continued)
BRIDGE DETAILS PART I (B-DETAILS)
NAME
DESCRIPTION
B701
Bridge Floor Drain (Welded Box)
B702
Bridge Floor Drain (Structural Tube)
B705
Bridge Offset Floor Drain (Welded Box)
B706
Bridge Offset Floor Drain (Structural Tube)
B710
Floor Drain For Tee Beams
B801
Contraction Joint
B807
Concrete End Diaphragm (For Double Tee Beam Spans With Pile Bent Abutment)
B809
Concrete End Diaphragm (For Steel Beams With Pile Bent Abutment)
B811
Concrete End Diaphragm
B812
B814
B816
B822
Concrete Pier Diaphragm (For Double Tee Beams)
B830
Concrete Railing (Type F) (Slipform Alternate)
B831
Concrete Parapet Railing (Slipform Alternate)
B850
Concrete Relief Joint Detail
B901
Median Sign Post Anchor
B905
Fence Post Anchorage
B910
Drainage System (For High Abutments)
B911
Drainage System (For Slab Over Parapet Abutments)
B920
Portable Precast Barrier Anchorage
B922
Portable Precast Barrier Anchorage (Temporary Usage On Roadways)
B935
Triple Beam Guardrail
B942
Inspection Door (In Vertical Or Horizontal Position)
B950
Anchor Bolt Cluster for Light Poles
(27M - 81M, MN45 - MN63 Prestressed Concrete Beams) (Contraction Abutment)

(63M 81M Prestressed Concrete Beams) (Parapet Abutment)
(27M - 54M, MN45 MN63 Prestressed Concrete Beams) (Parapet Abutment)
(14", 18" & 22" Rectangular Prestressed Concrete Beams) (Integral Abutment)
(Bridge Reconstruction On Trunk Highway Bridges)
(With No Approach Treatment)

(Temporary Usage In Limited Barrier Displacement Areas)
2-96
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN

APPENDIX 2-E *
BRIDGE DETAILS PART II (STANDARD FIGURES)
NAME
DESCRIPTION
Fig. 5-397.114
Concrete Barrier (Type F, TL-4) With Separate End Post
Fig. 5-397.115
Concrete Barrier (Type F, TL-4) With Integral End Post
Fig. 5-397.116
Concrete Barrier (Type F, TL-4) With Separate End Post
Fig. 5-397.117
Fig. 5-397.119
Wire Fence (Design W-1) And Concrete Parapet (Type P-1)
Fig. 5-397.120
Wire Fence (Design W-1) And Concrete Parapet (Type P-1)
Fig. 5-397.122
Fig. 5-397.124
Fig. 5-397.125
Concrete Barrier (Type F, TL-5) With Bridge Slab Sidewalk And Integral End Post
Fig. 5-397.126
Concrete Barrier (Type F, TL-5) With Bridge Slab Sidewalk And Integral End Post
Fig. 5-397.128
Concrete Barrier (Type F, TL-5) With Glare Screen and Integral End Post
Fig. 5-397.129
Concrete Barrier (Type F, TL-5) With Bikeway and Integral End Post
Fig. 5-397.130
Solid Median Barrier Type F (With Wearing Course)
Fig. 5-397.131
Split Median Barrier Type F (With Wearing Course)
Fig. 5-397.132
Solid Median Barrier And Glare Screen Type F (With Concrete Wearing Course)
Fig. 5-397.135
Split Median Barrier And Glare Screen Type F (Without Concrete Wearing Course)
Fig. 5-397.136
Split Median Barrier And Glare Screen Type F (With Concrete Wearing Course)
Fig. 5-397.137
Offset Split Median Barrier And Glare Screen Type F
Fig. 5-397.154
Metal Railing For Bikeways (Type M-1) And Concrete Parapet (Type P-1)
Fig. 5-397.157
Structural Tube Railing (Design T-1) And Concrete Parapet (Type P-2, TL-4)
Fig. 5-397.158
Structural Tube Railing (Design T-2) And Conc. Railing (Type F)
Fig. 5-397.173
Concrete Barrier (Type P-4, TL-4) Integral End Post (With Conc. Wearing Course)
Fig. 5-397.202
5 Ft. Wire Fence (Design W-1) For Pedestrian Bridges
(Without Concrete Wearing Course)

(Without Concrete Wearing Course)
(With Concrete Wearing Course)
(With Integral End Post)
(With Separate End Post)
(With Conc. Wearing Course)
(Without Conc. Wearing Course)
(Without Conc. Wearing Course)

Or Conc. Parapet (Type P-1)
2-97
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN

APPENDIX 2-E * (Continued)
BRIDGE DETAILS PART II (STANDARD FIGURES)
NAME
DESCRIPTION
Fig. 5-397.300
Grouted Injected Fabric Formed Slope Paving
Fig. 5-397.301
Concrete Slope Paving Under Bridges
Fig. 5-397.302
Stabilized Aggregate Slope Paving Under Bridges
Fig. 5-397.402
Conduit System For ______
Fig. 5-397.403
Conduit System (Lighting) Type F (Or Concrete Parapet and Fence Railing)
Fig. 5-397.504
27" Prestressed Concrete Beam (Pretensioned) 27M-_____
Fig. 5-397.505
Fig. 5-397.507
MN45" Prestressed Concrete Beam (Pretensioned) MN45-_____
Fig. 5-397.508
Fig. 5-397.509
Fig. 5-397.514
Fig. 5-397.515
Fig. 5-397.516
Fig. 5-397.517
Fig. 5-397.518
Fig. 5-397.525
22" Prestressed Concrete Double Tee Beam Type 22-___
Fig. 5-397.526
30" Prestressed Concrete Double Tee Beam Type 30-___
Fig. 5-397.550
14", 18" & 22" Rectangular Prestressed Concrete Beam
Fig. 5-397.627
Waterproof Expansion Device (With Type F Barrier)
Fig. 5-397.628
Waterproof Expansion Device Snow Plow Protection
Fig. 5-397.630
Waterproof Expansion Device (With Raised Median Or Sidewalk)
Fig. 5-397.900
As-Built Bridge Data
6' Or 8' Wide Tee Without Slab

6' Or 8' Wide Tee Without Slab
(Pretensioned) ___ RB-______
(Use On Skews Over 15 And Less Than 50)
2-98
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN

APPENDIX 2-F *
BRIDGE STANDARD PLANS: CULVERTS
NAME
DESCRIPTION
Fig. 5-395.100
Precast Concrete Box Culvert Tables
2 Sheets
Fig. 5-395.101(A)
Barrel Details
Fig. 5-395.101(B)
Barrel Details (Special Design)
Fig. 5-395.102
Precast Concrete End Section Type I Single Or Double Barrel
Fig. 5-395.104(A)
Precast Concrete End Section Type III Single Or Double Barrel
Fig. 5-395.104(B)
Fig. 5-395.110(A)
Fig. 5-395.110(B)
Fig. 5-395.111
Alternate Dropwalls For Box Culverts
Fig. 5-395.115
Embankment Protection For Box Culverts
For Skews Up To 71/2

For Skews 71/2 To 45
For Skews 71/2 To 45
2-99
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
2-100
APPENDIX 2-G
Mn/DOT STANDARD PLANS: SPECIAL STRUCTURES
NAME
DESCRIPTION
Fig. 5-297.620
Retaining Wall General Notes And Summary Of Quantities
Fig. 5-297.621
Retaining Wall Reinforcement Details (Short Walls)
Fig. 5-297.622
Retaining Wall Reinforcement Details (Medium Walls) (Panels __-__)
Fig. 5-297.623
Retaining Wall Reinforcement Details (Tall Walls) (Panels __-__)
Fig. 5-297.624
Retaining Wall Miscellaneous Details
Fig. 5-297.625
Retaining Wall Shear Key Details
Fig. 5-297.626
Retaining Wall Panel Tabulations (Level Fill)
Fig. 5-297.627
Retaining Wall Panel Tabulations (1:2 Sloped Fill)
Fig. 5-297.628
Retaining Wall Panel Tabulations (Live Load Surcharge)
Fig. 5-297.629
Retaining Wall Spread Footing Reinforcement Details
Fig. 5-297.630
Retaining Wall (Level Fill)
Fig. 5-297.631
Retaining Wall (1:2 Sloped Fill)
Fig. 5-297.632
Retaining Wall (Live Load Surcharge)
Fig. 5-297.633
Retaining Wall Concrete Parapet Barrier
Fig. 5-297.634
Retaining Wall Concrete Barrier (Type F, TL-4)
Fig. 5-297.635
Retaining Wall Light Standard Anchorage
3 Sheets
4 Sheets
4 Sheets
4 Sheets
4 Sheets
4 Sheets
4 Sheets
Refer to http://www.dot.state.mn.us/tecsup/splan/index.html
for current Retaining Wall Standards
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
2-101
APPENDIX 2-H
STANDARD PLAN NOTES
A. DESIGN DATA
2004 and Current Interim AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications
Load and Resistance Factor Design Method
HL 93 Live Load
Dead Load includes 20 pounds per square foot allowance for future wearing course
modifications
Material Design Properties:
Reinforced Concrete:
fc =
4 ksi n = 8
Fy =
60 ksi for reinforcement
Prestressed Concrete:
fc = ____ ksi n = 1 (Coordinate with beam detail sheet)
fpu =
270 ksi For " and 0.6" diameter low relaxation strands
Structural Steel:
Fy =
36 ksi Structural Steel Spec. 3306
Fy =
50 ksi Structural Steel Spec. 3309 or 3310
Fy =
70 ksi Structural Steel Spec. 3317
Cycles for Fatigue Design - _______________
Timber:
Fc =
1.20 ksi Pile Caps
Fb =
1.60 ksi Sawn Stringers and Timber Rails
Fb =
2.40 ksi Glued Laminated Timber Rails
Fb =
2.40 ksi Glued Laminated Stringers
Fb = ____ ksi
Fb =
1.75 ksi Rail Posts
Fb =
1.20 ksi All Other Timber
Deck Area = __________ square feet
[Coping to Coping and Out to Out of end blocks]
________________ (Projected, Current) ADT for year __________
________________ (Projected, Current) ADTT for year __________
Design Speed = __________ miles per hour
Bridge Operating Rating HS ________
B. CONSTRUCTION NOTES
The 2000 edition of the Minnesota Department of Transportation Standard
Specifications for Construction shall govern.
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
2-102
APPENDIX 2-H (Continued)

STANDARD PLAN NOTES
Bridge seat reinforcement shall be carefully placed to avoid interference with drilling
holes for anchor rods. The beams shall be erected in final position prior to drilling
holes for and placing anchor rods.
The first two digits of each bar mark indicate the bar size. Bars marked with the
suffix E shall be epoxy coated in accordance with Spec. 3301.
The pile loads shown in the plans and the corresponding nominal pile bearing
resistance (Rn) were computed using LRFD methodology. Pile bearing resistance
determined in the field shall incorporate the methods and/or formulas described in
the Special Provisions.
The subsurface utility information in this plan is utility quality level D. This utility
quality level was determined according to the guidelines of CI/ASCE 38-02, entitled
"Standard Guidelines for the Collection and Depiction of Existing Subsurface Utility
Data".
[Use on all plans involving excavation.]
[The signature title in the title block on the General Plan and Elevation sheet shall
be as follows:]
Approved _________________________________ Date ____________
C. DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL
3" diameter non-metallic drains.
[Use this note for weep holes in high wall abutments]
Restore side ditches after placement of slope paving to provide drainage as directed
by the Engineer. Restoration costs shall be included in price bid for Structure
Excavation.
[Use this note on railroad underpass.]
_______________ pipe to be placed under grading portion of contract.
[Use this note with combined Bridge and Roadway contracts only.
notes to suit job requirements.]
Modify the
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
2-103

STANDARD PLAN NOTES
D. EXCAVATION AND EARTHWORK
Quantity of Structure Excavation for payment is computed with the elevation shown
for each substructure unit as the upper limit. Excavation above these elevations will
be paid for under the grading portion of the contract.
[Specify an elevation for top of exposed or buried rock and add the note:
average elevations of top of rock are assumed for estimated plan quantities.
Use this note when rock and other type excavation will be encountered. Do not
use this note when lump sum payment for structure excavation is used.
The lower limits of structure excavation Class E shall be the same as the upper
limits of structure excavation Class WE except for rock excavations.
Construction of each abutment shall not be started until the approach fill at that
abutment has been constructed to the full height and cross section (and allowed to
settle for __________ days).
Roadway (or channel) excavation will be made by others in advance of bridge
construction.
[Not applicable on combined project.]
Footings shall be keyed into sound bedrock as directed by the Engineer.
footings shall have a minimum of 1'-0" cover.
Top of
Contractor shall dress slopes and place filter materials and riprap in approximate
areas as directed by the Engineer.
E. REINFORCEMENT
Spiral Data
Outside Diameter ______________________
Height _______________________________
Pitch ________________________________
Spiral Rod Size _______________________ Plain Round
Weight ______________________________ each
Outside diameter of dowel circle to be 21/4" less than inside diameter of spiral.
[Where No. 32E and larger sized column vertical bars are used, the 21/4"
dimension should be increased where required to provide for a proper fit.]
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
2-104

STANDARD PLAN NOTES
F. PILING AND FOOTINGS
ON SPREAD FOOTING
ON SPREAD FOOTING
__________ ABUTMENT
PIER _______
Spread Footing Load Data
Spread Footing Load Data
* Factored Design Bearing Pressure

Effective Width B'
__ tons/sq ft
__ ft
Factored Bearing Resistance bqn
__ tons/sq ft
* Based on __________ load combination.
* Factored Design Bearing Pressure

Effective Width B'
__ tons/sq ft
__ ft
(Perpendicular to Pier)
Effective Length L'
__ ft
(Parallel to Pier)
Factored Bearing Resistance bqn
__ tons/sq ft
WITH PILING
WITH PILING
__________ ABUTMENT
PIER _______
Computed Pile Load Tons/Pile
Factored Dead Load +
Factored Dead Load
Earth Pressure
Factored Live Load
Factored Live Load
Factored Overturning
* Factored Design Load
* Factored Design Load
__________ ABUTMENT
PIER _______
REQUIRED NOMINAL PILE BEARING
REQUIRED NOMINAL PILE BEARING
RESISTANCE Rn Tons/Pile
RESISTANCE Rn Tons/Pile
FIELD CONTROL METHOD
dyn
0.40
Mn/DOT Nominal Resistance

Formula
0.40
0.60
PDA
0.60
FIELD CONTROL METHOD
dyn
Mn/DOT Nominal Resistance

Formula
PDA
* Rn = (Factored Design Load) / dyn
* Rn
* Rn = (Factored Design Load) / dyn
* Rn
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
2-105

STANDARD PLAN NOTES
Pile Notes [substructure with Test Piles]
______
___*___ Test Piles _______ ft. long
______
___*___ Piles est. length _______ ft.
______
___*___ Piles reqd for __________
[ * Specify - treated timber, untreated timber, steel, or cast-in-place concrete.]
Pile Notes [substructure without Test Piles]
______
___*___ Piles _______ ft. long reqd for __________
[ * Specify - treated timber, untreated timber, steel, or cast-in-place concrete.]
Pile Notes [substructure with Special Pay items]
______
___*___ Piles est. length _______ ft. reqd for __________
[ * Specify - steel or cast-in-place.]
General Pile Notes
Pile spacing shown is at bottom of footing.
[Use for all piling.]
Piles marked thus (O-> , H-> ) to be battered ____ per ft. in direction shown.
[Use for all battered piling.]
All piles to be HP - ____.
[Use with all steel H piling.]
Piles to have a nominal diameter of __________.
[Use with all cast-in-place concrete piling.]
For pile splice details see B-Detail (B201 [CIP], B202 [steel]).
G. MATERIALS, FABRICATION AND ERECTION
(Use standard notes that are relevant to the project)
All structural steel shall conform to Spec. (3306, 3309, 3310, 3316, or 3317) unless
otherwise noted.
Shear studs on the top flange of the girder shall be installed in the field.
Chord line in camber diagram is a straight line from end to end of beam segment at
bottom of top flange.
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
2-106

STANDARD PLAN NOTES
The maximum residual camber in Span _________ is ___ inches at the ______
point of the span.
The maximum residual camber is ______". It is located at ____________.
Special assembly per Spec. 2471 will be required for the beam splices. The section
to be special assembled shall be from ________ to __________ .
[Check with the Structural Metals Unit; Abutment to abutment if < 300 ft. Three
adjacent points of support if > 300 ft.]
For welded flange splices, see Spec 2471.3F1a.
[Use drawings only if different than Bridge Welding Code 2002 Fig. 2.7 or 2.8]
Full assembly will be required per Spec. 2471.3H1b and 2471.3J2.
[The use of full assembly should be considered for extremely complicated
curved, superelevated structures (i.e. grid analysis used for design). Check with
the Structural Metals Unit and Fabrication Methods Unit.]
Web plates shall be furnished in available mill lengths and widths with a minimum
number of web splices. Location of splices shall be subject to the approval of the
Engineer and shall be a minimum of 1'-0" from stiffeners or flange splices.
Bearing stiffeners and ends of beams shall be perpendicular to flange.
[For rolled beams or grades 3%.]
Bearing stiffeners at abutments shall be vertical. Bearing stiffeners at piers shall be
perpendicular to flange. Ends of beams shall be vertical.
[For grades greater than 3% on plate girder bridges or skews greater than 20.
Check web crippling at pier if grade is greater than 3%.]
Rows of shear connectors shall be aligned parallel to the transverse slab
reinforcement bars.
[For bridge skews over 0 but less than 20.]
Shear connectors to project a minimum of 2" into deck structural slab. In no case
shall shear connectors project closer than 1" to top of deck structural slab.
Engineer to field verify beam elevation and authorize stud length.
Shear connectors to be included in weight of Structural Steel (3306, 3309, 3310)
and conform to Spec. 3391.
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
2-107

STANDARD PLAN NOTES
Flange plates for beams shall be cut to proper curvature.
[Check requirements of AASHTO Standard Specifications Section 10.15.2 to see
if heat curving is feasible.]
Camber diagram shown is for beams in unloaded position and provides for all dead
load deflections and residual camber.
All bolted connections shall be made with 7/8" diameter A325 bolts, except as noted.
Elevations given at field splices are taken at top of top flange splice plate.
Elevations shown at field splices are theoretical elevations furnished as a guide for
erection.
[Deflections from weight of beam and diaphragm are included.]
Deflections shown are for weight of slab, concrete overlay, railing, (median and
sidewalk). Negative sign indicates uplift.
[Do not include the weight of steel beams or future wearing course.]
H. CONCRETE PLACEMENTS
Cast counter weight at least 48 hours in advance of placing deck slab.
Make saw cut in structural slab (and concrete wearing course) over centerline of
piers as soon as the cutting can be done without raveling the concrete. Apply
polystyrene to tips of flanges that project past centerline of pier. Seal joint per
Spec. 3723.
[Use on prestressed concrete beam bridges with double diaphragms and slab
continuous over piers. Saw cut both structural slab and concrete wearing
course. See Figure 9.2.1.8 in this manual for detail.]
I. WELDED STEEL BEARING ASSEMBLIES
Structural steel shall conform to Spec. 3306 except as noted.
Shims to be included in price bid for bearing assemblies.
[Add to B Detail if shims are used.]
Pins and rollers shall conform to Spec. 2471.3D5.
Pins shall be cold finished alloy bar steel per Spec. 3314 Type II.
[For pins 5" or less where pin is not made from a larger diameter stock.]
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
2-108

STANDARD PLAN NOTES
Pins shall be hot rolled bar alloy bar steel per Spec. 3313 Type II.
[For pins over 5" where pin will be made from a larger diameter stock.]
Pintles shall conform to Spec. 3309 or 3310.
Lubricated bronze bushings shall conform to Spec. 3329.
All welded bearing assemblies shall be annealed after welding. Pin holes and top
and bottom plates shall be finished after annealing.
[For welded rockers and bolsters.]
Pins and pin holes shall be coated, in the shop, with a heavy protective grease.
Prior to erection, the pins and pin holes shall be cleaned and coated with an
approved grease.
The price bid for bearing assembly shall include all material (anchor rods, sheet
lead, bearing, and bolts for attaching bearing to beam) for each type as shown.
J. CUTTING AND REMOVAL OF OLD CONCRETE
Hatched areas indicate concrete to be removed.
No cutting will be permitted until the cutting limits have been outlined by the
Contractor and approved by the Engineer.
Removal and reconstruction shall
conform to Spec. 2433.
K. JOINTS AND JOINT SEALER
Finish top of all sidewalk and median joints with
1
edges with /2" V strips.
/4" radius edger, and vertical
Break bond at joint by approved method. No reinforcement through joint.

[Use for concrete sections less than 12" in height.]
Superstructure dimensions are based on the expansion joint dimension at 90 F.
[Use when superstructure details show more than one expansion joint dimension
for different temperatures.]
L. TIMBER BRIDGES
Construction requirements per Spec. 2403.3.
All timber piling to meet requirements of Spec. 3471.
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
2-109

STANDARD PLAN NOTES
All hardware to be galvanized per Spec. 3392.
All timber to be rough unless otherwise noted.
Top of wing pile which projects outside of wing cap shall be shaped to a 45 slope.
Treat tops of bearing and wing piles per Spec. 2452.3F.
preservation requirements.
See Spec. 3491 for
Fill in back of abutment is not to be placed until after superstructure has been
completed.
Fasten backing to abutment piles with two 60d nails at each intersection.
Bolt projections exceeding 1" shall be cut off. Repair end of bolt by painting with an
approved zinc-rich primer.
Drive all piles to a bearing of not less than __________ tons per pile. See Special
Provisions for wing wall pile driving requirements.
All timber shall be preservative treated in accordance with Spec. 3491.
M. MISCELLANEOUS
The Contractor shall make field measurements as necessary prior to fabrication of
the __________ to assure proper fit in the final work.
[Use when not otherwise referenced to Spec.2433.]
Beam length dimensions are slope lengths.
[Use where necessary for proper fit for prestressed beams.]
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
2-110
APPENDIX 2-I
STANDARD SUMMARY OF QUANTITIES NOTES
1.
State will furnish disk. Bend prongs outward to anchor disk in concrete. Bottom
of disk top to be placed flush with concrete. Payment for placing shall be
considered incidental to concrete pay items.
[When bench mark disk is required.]
2.
Payment shall be considered incidental to item _______________.

[For incidental quantities not listed as pay items (joint filler, waterproofing,
nameplate, etc.). Fill in blank with appropriate pay item (e.g. for three-ply joint
waterproofing:
Payment shall be considered incidental to item Structural
Concrete (3Y43)).]
3.
Included in weight of Structural Steel (33__ ).

[Miscellaneous steel quantities (protection angle, etc.).]
4.
Does not include test piles.

[When piling quantities are listed.]
5.
Includes slab (,end diaphragm, median barrier,

reinforcement.
[Add to epoxy coated reinforcement bar totals.]
6.
Bridge Slab Concrete (3Y3_ ) volume was computed using an average stool
height of ______ inches. Item includes approximately ______ cubic yards for
slab (and end blocks and approximately ______ cubic yards for end diaphragms).
[Use when the item as listed in the Summary of Quantities for Superstructure is
paid for on a square foot basis.]
7.
Concrete Wearing Course (3U17A) volume is approximately ______ cubic yards.

Item includes ______ square feet for bridge approach panels.
8.
Type ______ Railing Concrete (3Y46(A)) volume is approximately ______ cubic

yards.
paid for on a linear foot basis.]
9.
Sidewalk Concrete (3Y46(A)) volume is approximately ______ cubic yards.

[Use when the item as listed in the summary of Quantities for Superstructure is
sidewalk,)
and
railing
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
2-111
APPENDIX 2-I (Continued)

STANDARD SUMMARY OF QUANTITIES NOTES
10.
Median Barrier Concrete (3Y46(A)) volume is approximately _____ cubic yards.

paid for on a linear foot basis.]
11.
Raised Median Concrete (3Y46(A)) volume is approximately ______ cubic yards.

12.
Payment for bearings included in item Bearing Assembly per each.
13.
Quantities listed above are for informational purposes. Any additional minor
items and slight changes in quantities required shall be furnished by the
contractor with no additional compensation.
[Use with summaries of quantities for items paid for by lump sum. (e.g. conduit
systems).]
14.
Payment for anchorages included in item Anchorages Type Reinf. Bars per each.
15.
Payment for threaded couplers included in item Couplers (Reinforcement Bars)

T-_*_ per each.
[ * Specify metric bar size.]
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
2-112
APPENDIX 2-J *
BRIDGE PAY ITEMS
ITEM NO.
ITEM
UNIT
QUANTITY
2013.602
TCLP TEST
EACH
__________ (P)
2021.501
MOBILIZATION
LUMP SUM
__________
2031.501
FIELD OFFICE TYPE ______
EACH
__________
2031.503
FIELD LABORATORY TYPE ______
EACH
__________
2041.610
TRAINEES
HOUR
__________
2102.501
PAVEMENT MARKING REMOVAL
SQ. FT.
__________
2105.601
LUMP SUM
__________
2301.601
BRIDGE APPROACH PANELS
LUMP SUM
__________
2331.604
______ " THICK BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE
SQ. YD
__________ (P)3
2357.502
BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT
GALLON
__________
2401.501
STRUCTURAL CONCRETE ( ______ )
CU. YD.
__________ (P)3
2401.511
STRUCTURAL CONCRETE ( ______ )
SQ. FT.
__________ (P)3
______ LANE BYPASS (
______ LANE)
2401.512
BRIDGE SLAB CONCRETE ( __ ) [ 3Y33(A) or 3Y36(A)]
SQ. FT.
__________ (P)
2401.513
TYPE ______ RAILING CONCRETE (3Y46(A))
LIN. FT.
__________ (P)
2401.514
MEDIAN BARRIER CONCRETE (3Y46(A))
LIN. FT.
__________ (P)
2401.514
SPLIT MEDIAN BARRIER CONC (3Y46(A))
LIN. FT.
__________ (P)
2401.514
SPLIT MEDIAN BARRIER WITH GLARE SCREEN CONCRETE

LIN. FT.
__________ (P)
2401.515
SIDEWALK CONCRETE (3Y46(A))
SQ. FT.
__________ (P)
2401.516
RAISED MEDIAN CONCRETE (3Y46(A))
SQ. FT.
__________ (P)
2401.521
STRUCTURE EXCAVATION CLASS R
CU. YD.
__________
2401.541
REINFORCEMENT BARS
POUND
__________ (P)
2401.541
REINFORCEMENT BARS (EPOXY COATED)
POUND
__________ (P)
2401.543
SPIRAL REINFORCEMENT (EPOXY COATED)
POUND
__________ (P)
2401.601
FOUNDATION PREPARATION ______
LUMP SUM
__________
2401.601
STRUCTURE EXCAVATION
LUMP SUM
__________
2401.608
SHAFT REINFORCEMENT
POUND
__________
2411.618
REVERSE BATTEN SURFACE TREATMENT
SQ. FT.
__________ (P)
2401.618
SPECIAL SURFACE FINISH (INPLACE)
SQ. FT
__________
2402.521
STRUCTURAL STEEL ( __ ) [ 3306, 3309 or 3317]
POUND
__________ (P)
2402.546
FLOOR DRAIN TYPE ______
EACH
__________
2402.583
ORNAMENTAL METAL RAILING TYPE ______
LIN. FT.
__________ (P)
2402.583
STRUCTURAL TUBE RAILING DESIGN ______
LIN. FT.
__________ (P)
2402.583
METAL RAILING FOR BIKEWAYS TYPE M-1
LIN. FT.
__________ (P)
2402.583
METAL FISHING RAIL TYPE M-X
LIN. FT.
__________ (P)
2402.585
PIPE RAILING
LIN. FT.
__________ (P)
2402.590
ELASTOMERIC BEARING PAD TYPE ______
EACH
__________
(3Y46(A))
*Refer to http://bidlet.dot.state.mn.us/english2005.aspx for current Pay Items
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
2-113
APPENDIX 2-J * (Continued)

BRIDGE PAY ITEMS
ITEM NO.
ITEM
UNIT
QUANTITY
2402.591
EXPANSION JOINT DEVICES TYPE ______
LIN. FT.
__________ (P)
2402.595
BEARING ASSEMBLY
EACH
__________
2402.601
[ Use for Miscellaneous Items ]
LUMP SUM
__________
2402.601
DRAINAGE SYSTEM (ABUTMENTS)
LUMP SUM
__________
2402.602
EACH
__________
2402.603
STRUCTURAL TUBE RAILING WITH FENCE DES__________
LIN. FT.
__________ (P)
2402.603
LIN. FT.
__________ (P)3
2403.510
GLUED LAMINATED DECK PANELS TYPE ______
EACH
__________
2403.602
GLUED LAMINATED STRINGERS TYPE ______
EACH
__________
2403.602
PREFAB TIMBER PANELS TYPE ______
EACH
__________
2403.603
GLUED LAMINATED RAIL TYPE 1
LIN. FT.
__________ (P)
2403.603
TIMBER RAILING
LIN. FT.
__________ (P)
2404.501
CONCRETE WEARING COURSE (3U17A)
SQ. FT.
__________ (P)
2404.618
BLASTING (SPECIAL)
SQ. FT.
__________ (P)
2404.618
CONCRETE WEARING COURSE (3U17A) ______ "
SQ. FT.
__________ (P)
2405.502
PRESTRESSED CONCRETE BEAMS ______
LIN. FT
__________ (P)
2405.511
DIAPHRAGMS FOR TYPE ______ PRESTRESSED BEAMS
LIN. FT
__________ (P)
2405.603
PRESTRESSED CONC. DOUBLE TEE-BEAM TYPE ______ "
LIN. FT.
__________ (P)
2411.618
ARCHITECTURAL CONCRETE TEXTURE (ASHLAR STONE)
SQ. FT.
__________ (P)
2411.618
ARCHITECTURAL CONCRETE TEXTURE (CUT STONE)
SQ. FT.
__________ (P)
2411.618
ARCHITECTURAL CONCRETE TEXTURE (FIELDSTONE)
SQ. FT.
__________ (P)
2411.618
ARCHITECTURAL CONCRETE TEXTURE (FRACTURED FIN)
SQ. FT.
__________ (P)
2411.618
ARCHITECTURAL CONCRETE TEXTURE (FRACTURED GRANITE)
SQ. FT.
__________ (P)
2411.618
ARCHITECTURAL CONCRETE TEXTURE (RANDOM BATTEN)
SQ. FT.
__________ (P)
2411.618
ARCHITECTURAL SURFACE FINISH (SINGLE COLOR)
SQ. FT.
__________ (P)
2411.618
ARCHITECTURAL SURFACE FINISH (MULTI-COLOR)
SQ. FT.
__________ (P)
2411.618
ANTI-GRAFFITI COATING
SQ. FT.
__________ (P)
2412.511
______ PRECAST CONCRETE BOX CULVERT
LIN. FT.
__________ (P)
2412.512
______ PRECAST CONCRETE BOX CULVERT END SECTION
EACH
__________
2433.501
STRUCTURAL REMOVALS
LUMP SUM
__________
2433.502
REMOVE CONCRETE
CU. YD.
__________ (P)3
2433.503
REMOVE STRUCTURAL METALS
POUND
__________ (P)3
2433.505
REMOVE ______
SQ. FT.
__________ (P)3
2433.506
REMOVE ______
LIN. FT.
__________ (P)3
2433.507
REMOVE ______
LUMP SUM
__________
2433.512
PLACE USED TRUSS
LUMP SUM
__________
2433.516
ANCHORAGES TYPE ______
EACH
__________
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
2-114

BRIDGE PAY ITEMS
ITEM NO.
ITEM
UNIT
QUANTITY
2433.601
REPAIR ______
LUMP SUM
__________
2433.601
RECONSTRUCT ______
LUMP SUM
__________
2433.602
REPAIR ______
EACH
__________
2433.602
RECONSTRUCT ______
EACH
__________
2433.602
CLEAN ______
EACH
__________
2433.602
GREASE EXP BRG ASSEMBLIES TYPE ______
EACH
__________
2433.603
RECONSTRUCT ( __ ) JOINT TYPE ___ ( EXP., FIX, PAVEMENT)
LIN. FT.
__________ (P)
2433.603
REPAIR ______
LIN. FT.
__________
2433.603
RECONSTRUCT ______
LIN. FT.
__________
2433.607
CEMENT GROUT
CU. YD.
__________
2433.618
SCARIFY ______
SQ. FT.
__________
2433.618
BRIDGE SURFACE SEALER
SQ. FT.
__________
2442.501
REMOVE EXISTING BRIDGE ______
LUMP SUM
__________
2442.502
SALVAGE AND HAUL MATERIAL (BRIDGE)
LUMP SUM
__________
2451.503
GRANULAR BACKFILL ( __ ) [ CV OR LV]
CU. YD.
__________ (P)
2451.505
AGGREGATE BACKFILL ( __ ) [ CV OR LV]
CU. YD
__________ (P)
2452.503
TREATED TIMBER PILING DELIVERED
LIN. FT
__________
2452.504
TREATED TIMBER PILING DRIVEN
LIN. FT
__________
LIN. FT.
__________
LIN. FT
__________
LIN. FT
__________
LIN. FT
__________
EACH
__________
EACH
__________
2452.507
2452.508
C-I-P CONCRETE PILING DELIVERED

C-I-P CONCRETE PILING DRIVEN
5
______ "
______ "
______ "
2452.510
STEEL H-PILING DRIVEN
2452.511
STEEL H-PILING DELIVERED
2452.517
TREATED TIMBER TEST PILE 25' LONG
2452.519
______ "
C-I-P CONCRETE TEST PILE ______ FT LONG

5
______ "
2452.520
STEEL H-TEST PILE ______ FT LONG
EACH
__________
2452.526
PILE LOAD TEST TYPE ______
______ "
EACH
__________
2452.602
DRILLED SHAFT LOAD TEST TYPE ______
EACH
__________
2452.602
PILE ANALYSIS
EACH
__________
2452.602
PILE PLACEMENT
EACH
__________
2452.602
PILE POINTS ______ "
EACH
__________
2452.602
PILE REDRIVING
EACH
__________
2452.602
PILE TIP PROTECTION ______ "
EACH
__________
2452.602
STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY TEST
EACH
__________
2452.603
______ " STEEL PILE SHELLS
LIN. FT.
__________
2452.603
C-I-P CONCRETE PILING __" FLUTED FURNISH & DRIVEN
LIN. FT.
__________
2453.603
___" DIA CASING
LIN. FT.
__________
2453.603
___" DIA DRILLED SHAFT ( ______ )
LIN. FT.
__________
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
2-115

BRIDGE PAY ITEMS
ITEM NO.
ITEM
6
______
UNIT
QUANTITY
2472.602
COUPLERS (REINFORCEMENT BARS) T-
EACH
__________
2476.501
PAINTING METAL STRUCTURES
LUMP SUM
__________
2476.502
PAINTING METAL STRUCTURES
SQ. FT.
__________
2476.601
LEAD SUBSTANCES COLLECTION & DISPOSAL
LUMP SUM
__________ (P)
2476.601
WASTE COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL
LUMP SUM
__________ (P)
2478.502
EPOXY ZINC-RICH PAINT SYSTEM (SHOP)
SQ. FT.
__________
2478.503
EPOXY ZINC-RICH PAINT SYSTEM (FIELD)
LUMP SUM
__________
2478.506
EPOXY ZINC-RICH PAINT SYSTEM (OLD)
SQ. FT
__________ (P)
2478.618
EPOXY ZINC-RICH PAINT SYSTEM (NEW)
SQ. FT.
__________
2479.618
INORGANIC ZINC-RICH PAINT SYSTEM (FIELD)
SQ. FT.
__________ (P)
2479.618
SHOP APPLIED INORGANIC ZINC-RICH PRIMER
SQ. FT.
__________ (P)
2511.501
RANDOM RIPRAP CLASS ______
CU. YD.
__________ (P)
2511.507
GROUTED RIPRAP
CU. YD.
__________
2511.511
GRANULAR FILTER
CU. YD.
__________ (P)
2514.501
CONCRETE SLOPE PAVING
SQ. YD.
__________ (P)
2514.503
AGGREGATE SLOPE PAVING
SQ. YD
__________ (P)
2545.501
ELECTRIC LIGHT SYSTEM
LUMP SUM
__________
2545.509
CONDUIT SYSTEM ( __ ) [ LIGHTING, SIGNALS, TELEPHONE,

LUMP SUM
__________
2557.501
WIRE FENCE DESIGN ______
LIN. FT.
__________ (P)
2557.603
CHAIN LINK ENCLOSURE
LIN. FT
__________ (P)
2563.601
TRAFFIC CONTROL
LUMP SUM
__________
2563.613
[ Use for Traffic Control Devices ]
UNIT DAY
__________
2564.603
4" ______ LINE ______-POLY PREFORMED
LIN. FT.
__________
or POWER]
(P) Denotes plan quantity pay items as per Spec. 1901.

1
Number of Lanes
Actual Lane Width
Plan quantity may or may not be used for payment
Diameter of Pile
Size and Weight
Metric Bar Size
FEBRUARY 2007
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
APPENDIX 2-K
CONVERSION FROM INCHES TO DECIMALS OF A FOOT
2-116
OCTOBER 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
3-1
3. LOAD AND
LOAD FACTORS
The loads section of the AASHTO LRFD Specifications is greatly expanded

over that found in the Standard Specifications. This section will present
applicable loads and provide guidance to Mn/DOTs practice for the
application of these loads.
3.1 Load Factors

and Combinations
[3.4.1]
The standard load combinations for LRFD design are presented in LRFD
Table 3.4.1-1. Mn/DOT regularly uses all load combinations except
Strength II and Extreme Event I. These are used only for specialized
structures or situations.
Several of the loads have variable load factors (e.g., P , TG , SE ). The
load factors for permanent loads ( P ) typically have two values, a
maximum value and a minimum value. When analyzing a structure it will
often be necessary to use both values. The objective is to envelope the
maximum load effects on various elements for design. A box culvert
structure illustrates the use of both values. When determining the
moment in the top slab of the culvert the maximum load factor is used
with vertical earth loads, while the minimum load factor is used on the
lateral or horizontal earth loads.
The situation reverses when
determining the moments in the wall of the culvert. A minimum load
factor is used on the vertical earth loads and a maximum value is used
on the horizontal earth loads.
When assembling load combinations do not use more than one load
factor for any load component. For example, when checking uplift, a load
factor of 0.90 or 1.25 should be used for the dead load on all spans.
Designers should not try to use 0.9 on the span adjacent to the uplift
point and 1.25 on the next span. There is one exception to this per
Mn/DOT policy.
When considering Strength IV for design of
substructures, apply the maximum 1.5 load factor to the superstructure
dead load (DC) only. For DC of the substructure element itself, apply a
maximum 1.25 load factor.
Designers must ensure the structure has been checked for adequacy in
carrying all appropriate load combinations at any possible construction
stage.
For example, a high abutment should be checked for any
permissible construction case in addition to the final condition. The
abutment may be completely constructed prior to placement of the
beams (a case which maximizes the horizontal earth pressure load with a
minimum of vertical load) or the abutment could be constructed such
that the superstructure is completed prior to backfilling. This latter case
would maximize vertical load without horizontal earth pressure load.
Designers should investigate both cases.
OCTOBER 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
3-2
Load Combinations
The load factors and the combination of different load components
presented in LRFD Table 3.4.1-1 have been calibrated to produce
structures with more uniform reliability than that offered with Standard
Specification designs.
In general, Mn/DOT recognizes all the load
combinations presented in the LRFD Specifications. The Strength II and
Extreme Event I load combinations will rarely control. In addition to the
standard load combinations, Mn/DOT designs shall consider a
construction load combination.
Strength I: Basic load combination used to determine the flexural and
shear demands without wind.
Strength II: Basic load combination used to determine the flexural and
shear demands of a structure subject to a permit vehicle or a special
design vehicle specified by the owner. (Mn/DOT does not use a special
vehicle for design.)
Strength III: Load combination used to determine flexural and shear
demands that include wind. (Winds over 55 mph.)
Strength IV: Load combination relating to very high dead load to live
load force effect ratios.
Consider the Strength IV load combination for substructure design only if
it governs the superstructure design. When Strength IV is considered,
use the 1.5 load factor for superstructure DC only. Use a 1.25 load factor
for substructure DC.
Strength V: Load combination corresponding to normal vehicular use of
the bridge concurrent with a wind of 55 mph.
Extreme Event I:
Load combination including earthquake effects.
Earthquake analysis is typically not performed.
Extreme Event II:
Load combination corresponding to ice loads,
collision loads, and certain hydraulic events with a reduced vehicular live
load. This combination is used for barrier and deck overhang designs.
Service I: Load combination used for the design of many elements. It
is used for service load stress checks (prestressed concrete), deflection
checks, crack control checks in reinforced concrete, etc.
OCTOBER 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
3-3
Service II: Load combination used to check yielding and connections in

steel structures.
Service III:
Load combination used to check nominal tension in
prestressed concrete structures.
Fatigue: Load combination used for the design of structures subject to
repetitive live load. This pertains primarily to steel structures and steel
reinforcement in concrete structures.
[3.4.2]
Construction:
A construction load case must be considered by
designers. Use a 1.5 load factor for construction live loads and a 1.25
load factor for dead loads (including formwork and falsework).
3.2 Load Modifiers

[1.3.3, 1.3.4, 1.3.5]
For most structures, each of the load modifiers will be 1.00. For a limited
number of bridges, load modifiers with values different from 1.00 need to
be used. Table 3.2.1 summarizes Mn/DOTs policy for load modifiers.
Table 3.2.1
Standard Mn/DOT Load Modifiers
Modifier
Ductility ( D )
Redundancy ( R ) *
Importance ( I ) **
Value
1.00
Condition
Steel structures, timber bridges,
ductile concrete structures
1.05
Non-ductile concrete structures
1.00
Redundant
1.05
Non-redundant
0.90
Temporary Bridges
0.95
ADT < 500
1.00
500 ADT 40,000
Major river crossing or

1.05
ADT > 40,000 or

Mainline interstate bridge
* Beam type superstructures with 4 or more beams per span are considered redundant
** Use Importance Factor for design of the superstructure only
Note that load modifiers apply only to the strength limit state.
other limit states, use a value of 1.00 for all load modifiers.
For all
OCTOBER 2006
3.3 Permanent
Loads (Dead and
Earth)
[3.5]
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
3-4
To reduce the number of load factors considered through the design

process, use a value of 0.020 ksf for the future wearing surface load and
combine with the other component dead loads (DC loads). Also, combine
the load due to a concrete wearing course with other DC loads.
Table 3.3.1 lists unit weights for a number of materials. Designers
should note that several of these items differ slightly from the values
contained in Section 3 of the LRFD Specifications.
Table 3.3.1
Mn/DOT Standard Unit Weights
3.4 Live Loads

[3.6]
Material
Unit Weight (kcf)
Bituminous Wearing Course
0.150
Cast-In-Place Concrete
0.150
Precast Concrete
0.155
Precast Box Culvert
0.150
Compacted Fill on Box Culverts
0.130
Standard Fill
0.120
Steel
0.490
Timber
0.050
Water
0.0624
HL-93 is the designation for the calibrated design live load provided in
the LRFD Specifications. It should be considered the normal design load
for Mn/DOT highway structures.
For pedestrian bridges, in addition to the pedestrian live load, design for
a maintenance vehicle live load equivalent to an H-5 truck for deck
widths from 6 to 10 feet, and an H-10 truck for wider decks. Use of the
dynamic load allowance is not required with the maintenance vehicle.
Where appropriate, additional live loads should be considered. Additional
live loads might include: snow removal equipment on sidewalks and
bridge inspection or snooper loads on bridges with large overhangs. If
construction equipment or maintenance equipment can or will operate
adjacent to retaining walls and abutments, a live load surcharge should
be incorporated into the design.
OCTOBER 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
3-5
3.4.1 HL-93 Live

Load, LL
[3.6.1.2]
Use the design truck, fatigue truck, design tandem, truck train and lane
loads described in the LRFD Specifications. The double tandem loading
described in the commentary to LRFD Article 3.6.1.3.1 will not be used.
Tables 3.4.1.1 and 3.4.1.2 at the end of this section list the unfactored
moments and shears for HL-93 loading on simple spans between 1 and
200 feet.
3.4.2 Multiple
Presence Factor,
MPF
[3.6.1.1.2]
When a structure is being evaluated for load cases involving more than
two lanes of traffic a reduction factor or multiplier can be used. This
factor recognizes the reduced probability that all lanes will be fully loaded
at the same time. Note that the LRFD Specifications require a 1.2 factor
to be used for the design of structures carrying a single lane of traffic.
Mn/DOT has one variance to the multiple presence factors listed in LRFD
Table 3.6.1.1.2-1.
When evaluating the live load deflections of a
structure, use a 0.85 multiple presence factor for load cases with more
than three lanes of traffic.
3.4.3 Dynamic
Load Allowance, IM
[3.6.2]
What was known as impact in the Standard Specifications is called

dynamic load allowance in the LRFD Specifications. The base dynamic
load allowance factors are presented in LRFD Table 3.6.2.1-1. Designers
should note that the base values are reduced for buried components and
for wood structures.
3.4.4 Pedestrian
Live Load, PL
[3.6.1.6]
Pedestrian live loads vary with the function of the bridge.

For
conventional highway bridges with sidewalks wider than two feet, use an
intensity of 0.075 ksf.
For pedestrian bridges, refer to the Guide Specifications for Design of
Pedestrian Bridges for the pedestrian live load to be used.
3.4.5 Braking
Force, BR
[3.6.4]
Use judgment when applying braking forces to a structure. For one-way

bridges, apply the braking force in all lanes. For two lane, two-way
bridges, apply the braking force in one direction in all lanes. For two-way
bridges with more than two traffic lanes, determine the traffic direction
with the greatest width and apply the braking force to the number of
lanes that fit within the width.
The dynamic load allowance factor is not applied to braking forces.
However, multiple presence factors are to be used.
OCTOBER 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
3-6
For pier design, braking forces are to be applied at a height 6 feet above
the roadway surface and in a longitudinal direction. In bridges where
there is not a moment connection between the superstructure and
substructure (i.e., beam bridges on bearings), the braking force can be
assumed to be applied to the pier at the bearings.
3.4.6 Centrifugal
Force, CE
[3.6.3]
Similar to braking forces, multiple presence factors are to be applied to

the centrifugal force, while the dynamic load allowance is not applied.
Apply the centrifugal force at a height of 6 feet above the top of the deck.
3.4.7 Live Load

Application to
Buried Structures
For buried structures, a lane plus a design truck or tandem is applied to

the roadway and distributed through the fill. If the fill is 2 feet or less,
the live load is applied as a footprint to the top of the structure. For fills
over 2 feet, the footprint load spreads out through the soil fill.
3.4.8 Live Load

Surcharge, LS
[3.11.6]
Retaining walls and abutments typically need to be designed for load

combinations with live load surcharge. The equivalent soil heights to be
used for different heights of abutments and retaining walls are provided
in LRFD Tables 3.11.6.4-1 and 3.11.6.4-2.
3.5 Water Loads,

WA
[3.7]
Some of the hydraulic event terminology used in the Mn/DOT hydraulic

report differs from that used in the AASHTO LRFD Specifications (LRFD):
The Mn/DOT design flood for a structure is based on the average
daily traffic that passes over the structure with the maximum design
flood being a 50-year flood. (Refer to Section 3.2 of the Mn/DOT
Drainage Manual for more information.) This is used as part of a
roadway and surrounding property risk assessment done by the
Hydraulics Section.
[2.6.4.4.2 and
3.7.5]
The LRFD design flood for a structure is the lesser of the

overtopping or 100-year flood. Use the LRFD design flood water
and scour elevations (the 100-year flood is called out as the basic
flood in the Mn/DOT hydraulic report) when analyzing piers for
stream pressure loads under the strength and service limit states.
The check flood for scour, as defined by LRFD, is the lesser of the
overtopping or 500-year flood. Use the LRFD check flood for scour
water and scour elevations when analyzing piers for stream pressure
loads under the extreme event limit state.
OCTOBER 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
3-7
Design structural elements for both the no scour condition and the
anticipated scour condition.
3.6 Wind Loads,

WS
[3.8.1.2, 3.8.2]
The design wind speed is 100 mph. For most structures the total height
will be below 30 feet and base wind pressures can be used for design.
For normal girder and slab bridges with spans up to 125 feet, the
following simplified wind loads may be applied simultaneously to the
superstructure instead of the varied angle wind loads given in LRFD
3.8.1.2.2:
WS = 0.050 ksf applied transverse to the bridge
WS = 0.012 ksf applied longitudinal to the bridge
The vertical overturning wind load described in LRFD Article 3.8.2 must
also be considered in design.
For determination of wind loads applied to ornamental metal railing or
chain link fence, designers may assume that 30% of the rail or fence area
is solid.
3.7 Wind on Live

Load, WL
[3.8.1.3]
The force effects of wind on live load shall be considered for the Strength
V and the Service I load combinations. The force components (parallel
and normal) for different wind skew angles are presented in LRFD Table
3.8.1.3-1.
For normal girder and slab bridges with spans up to 125 feet, the
following simplified wind loads may be applied simultaneously instead of
the varied angle wind loads given in LRFD 3.8.1.3:
WL = 0.100 klf applied transverse to the bridge
WL = 0.040 klf applied longitudinal to the bridge
Apply the wind on live load forces at a height 6 feet above the top of the
deck.
3.8 Earthquake
Effects, EQ
[3.10]
All of Minnesota is in Seismic Performance Zone 1 with acceleration

coefficients varying between 2 and 3 percent.
With very small
acceleration coefficients, earthquake forces will rarely govern the design
of Mn/DOT structures. However, the LRFD Specifications require that
Performance Zone 1 structures satisfy detailing requirements. These
requirements pertain to the length of bearing seats supporting
OCTOBER 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
3-8
superstructure elements and the capacity of a force path for

superstructure dead loads to be transferred to substructure elements.
In accordance with LRFD Article 3.10.9.2, the connection between
superstructure and substructure shall be capable of transferring 20% of
the vertical reaction due to permanent load and tributary live load. Fixed
bearing anchorages shall be capable of resisting a horizontal force equal
to 20% of the total vertical dead load.
3.9 Ice Loads, IC

[3.9]
The design ice load is 1.5 feet of ice with a crushing strength of 32.0 ksf.
Assume the ice load is applied at a height two-thirds of the distance from
the flowline elevation to the lesser of the 100-year flood or overtopping
flood high water elevation.
3.10 Earth
Pressure,
EV, EH or ES
[3.5.1, 3.5.2]
[3.11.5, 3.11.6]
For applications with level backfill, simplified equivalent fluid methods can
be used. For level backfill applications where the at-rest earth pressures
can be relieved by rotation (cantilevered walls with stem heights of 5 feet
or greater), design walls for an active earth pressure of 0.033 kcf
equivalent fluid weight.
For level backfill applications where at-rest earth pressures cannot be
relieved, design for an equivalent fluid weight of 0.060 kcf.
Assume that the horizontal resultant for lateral earth pressures acts at a
height of H / 3 .
Passive earth pressure loads are to be used for integral abutment
designs. See Article 11.1.1 of this manual for load application.
3.11 Temperature,
Shrinkage, Creep,
Settlement, TU, SH,
CR, SE [3.12]
Temperature, shrinkage, creep, and settlement produce several

structural effects. They generate internal forces, redistribute internal
forces, and produce movements.
3.11.1
Temperature
Effects
One of the most ambiguous tasks for bridge designers is the

determination of the appropriate temperature range and corresponding
deformations for use in calculating force effects on a structure. Past
Mn/DOT practice has been to design concrete frames for a 45F
temperature fall and a 35F temperature rise, a temperature range
smaller than what the bridge will actually experience during its service
life. This method dates back to the 1920s, and the reduced temperature
OCTOBER 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
3-9
range should be considered a rule of thumb that was applied to typical

bridges using simplified analysis methods of the time.
No notable
performance issues have been attributed to application of a lower thermal
temperature range when applied to pier frames or relatively short span
bridges. On complicated, longer span bridge frames, longitudinal thermal
effects become a larger issue that designers should not ignore.
Therefore, the following policy is to be used for application of thermal
loads on typical and non-typical bridges.
Typical Bridges
Generally, typical bridges include:
routine multiple span prestressed beam, steel beam, and slab
bridges
bridges with two or less fixed piers
bridges with piers less than 30 feet tall
[3.12.2.1]
For typical bridges, use LRFD Procedure A for internal pier frame forces
due to thermal expansion. For concrete frames, Procedure A allows for a
temperature range of 80F. Use a base construction temperature of 45F,
which corresponds to designing for thermal force effects due to a 45F
temperature fall and a 35F temperature rise. In addition, apply the
Strength Limit State load factor of 0.5 for calculation of thermal force
effects and use gross section properties in the analysis. The 0.5 load
factor accounts for the reduction in thermal forces due to cracking of the
concrete.
[3.12.2.2]
For longitudinal effects, use a temperature range of 150F (-30F to

120F), which is the approximate range given by LRFD Procedure B for
Minnesotas climate. Use a base construction temperature of 45F and
apply the Strength Limit State load factor of 0.5 for calculation of thermal
force effects while using gross section properties in the analysis. Also,
see Article 14.1 of this manual for guidance on fixity and thermal
movements.
Design joint openings for movements associated with a temperature
range of 150F (-30F to 120F). Use a load factor for movement of 1.0.
(Note that this value differs from the LRFD Specifications based on past
performance of joints in Minnesota.) See Article 14.2 of this manual for
guidance on expansion joints.
Design bearings for movements associated with a temperature range of
150F (-30F to 120F) and a base construction temperature of 45F. For
computation of movement for the elastomeric pad minimum compressive
stress check, use a load factor of 1.0. For computation of movement to
OCTOBER 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
3-10
determine minimum elastomer thickness, use a load factor of 1.3. (Note

that these load factors differ from the LRFD Specifications based on past
performance of elastomeric bearings in Minnesota.) For computation of
movement for design of pot bearings, use a load factor of 1.2.
Non-typical Bridges
Non-typical bridges are those with tall or slender piers or those with long
spans. For these bridges, the pier stiffness is critical in determining
movements and forces, and a refined analysis must be used to reduce
force effects due to thermal movements and other loads.
[3.12.2.2]
For non-typical bridges, use a temperature range of 150F (-30F to

120F) for longitudinal effects, which is the approximate range given by
LRFD Procedure B for Minnesotas climate. When analyzing bridges with
this larger thermal range, the designer must consider the following in the
analysis:
Pier stiffness Use refined method to determine the appropriate
percentage of gross stiffness along the height of the pier.
Bearing fixity and flexibility Account for the stiffness of
expansion bearings in determination of the overall bridge
movements.
Construction method, staging, temperature range at erection, and
its effect on the connectivity of the structural system.
Foundation stiffness Elastic shortening of the piles provides a
significant relaxation to forces applied to the pier. Also, horizontal
displacements of piling will provide moment reduction.
For joint and bearing sizing, use a 150F range at Service Limit
State conditions. Use a thermal movement load factor of 1.2.
Also use this movement to determine horizontal force
requirements for guided bearings.
For Strength Limit State, use a thermal load factor of 1.0 with the
150F range for longitudinal force effects. For transverse effects
within individual pier frames, an 80F range with a 45F base
construction temperature may be used.
A 3-D model of the bridge with appropriate elastic restraints at supports
may be required (especially for curved bridges) to determine the
direction of movement, magnitude of thermal forces, and interaction
between piers for determination of the appropriate cracked section
reduction in stiffness. The final solution may require several iterations
and may be bracketed using an upper-bound and lower-bound stiffness
matrix (i.e., - gross sections, partially cracked sections, etc.) so that the
final solution falls within an acceptable range for the particular structure.
OCTOBER 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
3-11
In cases where several piers are fixed to the superstructure,

consideration of ambient temperature at anticipated time of construction
(including adjustments for closure pours as necessary) should be
considered. Setting of bearings and joints within the structure may
require special provisions that call for contractor submittals which state
the intended method of bearing and joint installation to obtain a neutral
position at the mean temperature.
3.11.2 Shrinkage
Effects
Use a design
computations.
relative
humidity
to
73%
for
concrete
shrinkage
3.12 Pile
Downdrag, DD
For situations where long friction piles or end-bearing piles penetrate

through a soft, top layer of material, there may be settlement of the soft
layer. The settlement of this layer will add load to the pile through
friction. The foundation report will provide the amount of downdrag to be
considered.
3.13 Friction
Forces, FR
[3.13]
Friction forces are used in the design of several structural components.

For example, substructure units supporting bearings with sliding surfaces
should be designed to resist the friction force required to mobilize the
bearing.
3.13.1 Sliding
Bearings
LRFD Table 14.7.2.5-1 provides design coefficients of friction for PTFE

sliding surfaces.
3.13.2
Soil/Backwall
Interface and
Soil/Footing
Interface
Use LRFD Table 3.11.5.3-1 to obtain the coefficients of friction between

the backwall/footing and soil. When cohesionless backfill is used behind
a vertical or near vertical wall, the friction between the backwall and the
backfill can be ignored.
When evaluating the sliding resistance between a concrete and soil
interface a coefficient of 0.80 shall be used. For cases where a shear key
is utilized, the portion of the failure plane with soil on both sides should
be evaluated with a coefficient of friction of 1.00.
OCTOBER 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
3-12
3.14 Extreme
Event
The probability of extreme event loads occurring simultaneously is

extremely small and therefore, is not to be applied concurrently. In
some cases, extreme event loads are mutually exclusive. A vessel
collision load can not occur when the waterway is iced over.
3.14.1 Vehicle
Collision, CT
[3.6.5]
Designers need to be concerned with vehicle collision loads. Unprotected

structural elements that may be struck bluntly by a vehicle or train shall
be protected by a Test Level 5 barrier or be designed to resist the
collision force
Review the Preliminary Plans to determine what is
required. Also, see Section 11.2.4 of this manual for complete pier
protection policy and requirements.
A large number of safety barriers were tested as part of NCHRP Report
350. The performance of the barriers was classified with different test
levels ranging from TL-1 to TL-6.
Decks supporting safety barriers designed to contain errant vehicles on
bridges shall be designed for collision forces consistent with roadway
standards. In most cases, the minimum standard for safety barriers in
Minnesota is Test Level 4 (TL-4). Under certain circumstances, (timber
railings on secondary roads being an example) barriers may satisfy
reduced test level requirements. See the preliminary design section of
this manual for additional guidance.
3.14.2 Vessel
Collision, CV
[3.14]
Structures within reaches of the Mississippi, Minnesota, and St. Croix

rivers, and Lake Superior deemed navigable by the Corps of Engineers
shall be designed to resist vessel collision loads.
3.15 Uplift
For curved bridges with skews or continuous bridges with spans that vary
significantly, there is a possibility of uplift at the end supports. For
situations where a sidespan is less than 70% of the adjacent continuous
span, uplift should be considered. Uplift may occur during construction if
deck placement is not sequenced properly or during service due to the
application of live load if the spans are not balanced. If uplift occurs, the
performance of the bearings and expansion joints may be compromised.
When evaluating a structure for uplift the load factors for permanent load
should be reviewed. Minimum and maximum factors shall be combined
for different elements to generate the most conservative or largest uplift
force effect.
[Table 3.4.1-2]
OCTOBER 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
3-13
3.15.1 Deck Pours
The construction of a deck on beam bridge will require that a concrete

deck be placed on supporting elements. The deck placement sequence
and the time between steps in the sequence will typically have little
impact on the strength of composite sections. However, the service level
stresses locked into the structure will be impacted by the order and
timing of the placement of the deck. For guidance on deck placement
sequence, refer to Article 9.2.1 of this manual.
3.16 Construction
Loads
The designer must consider construction loads during design.

The
diaphragm spacing and top flange dimensions in the positive moment
region of the steel beam superstructures are based on the construction
load stage. Specialty structures such as segmental concrete bridges
have unique construction loads to consider during design that are
explicitly defined. Unless project specific information is available or
necessary, use the following loads:
Formwork
For conventional formwork (plywood, etc.) assume a uniform dead load
of 0.010 ksf. In addition to dead loads, design concrete formwork for a
construction live load of 0.050 ksf.
Structural Elements
Structural elements that support formwork are assumed to have a larger
tributary area and consequently are to be designed for a smaller
construction live load of 0.020 ksf.
Consider reconstruction loads when designing end diaphragms.
At
abutments, design end diaphragms to carry vertical jacking forces during
bearing replacement.
3.17 Deflections
[2.5.2.6.2]
Mn/DOTs maximum permitted live load deflection for highway bridges

without sidewalks is L / 800 . For highway bridges with sidewalks, the
limit is reduced to L / 1000 .
For deck-on-beam bridges, use the following load distribution when
computing deflections:
Live Load:
# Lanes
Live Load Distribution Factor = MPF
# Beams
Dead Load:
Total DC
Dead Load (per beam) =
# Beams
OCTOBER 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
3-14
Table 3.4.1.1
Maximum Unfactored HL-93 Live Load Moments, Shears, and Reactions
Simple Spans, One Lane, w/o Dynamic Load Allowance
Span
(ft)
Moments
Shears and End Reactions
Truck
Tandem
Lane
Span Pt.
Truck
Tandem
Lane
(kip-ft)
(kip-ft)
(kip-ft)
(%)
(kip)
(kip)
(kip)
8.0
6.3
0.1
0.50
32.0
25.0
0.3
16.0
12.5
0.3
0.50
32.0
25.0
0.6
24.0
18.8
0.7
0.50
32.0
25.0
1.0
32.0
25.0
1.3
0.50
32.0
25.0
1.3
40.0
31.3
2.0
0.50
32.0
30.0
1.6
48.0
37.5
2.9
0.50
32.0
33.3
1.9
56.0
43.8
3.9
0.50
32.0
35.7
2.2
64.0
50.0
5.1
0.50
32.0
37.5
2.6
72.0
62.5
6.5
0.50
32.0
38.9
2.9
10
80.0
75.0
8.0
0.50
32.0
40.0
3.2
11
84.5
92.0
9.3
0.40
32.0
40.9
3.5
12
92.2
104.0
11.1
0.40
32.0
41.7
3.8
13
103.0
115.9
13.4
0.45
32.0
52.3
4.2
14
110.9
128.3
15.5
0.45
32.0
52.9
4.5
15
118.8
140.6
17.8
0.45
34.1
43.3
4.8
16
126.7
153.0
20.3
0.45
36.0
43.8
5.1
17
134.6
165.4
22.9
0.45
37.6
44.1
5.4
18
142.6
177.8
25.7
0.45
39.1
44.4
5.8
19
150.5
190.1
28.6
0.45
40.4
44.7
6.1
20
158.4
202.5
31.7
0.45
41.6
45.0
6.4
21
166.3
214.9
34.9
0.45
42.7
45.2
6.7
22
174.2
227.3
38.3
0.45
43.6
45.5
7.0
23
182.2
239.6
41.9
0.45
44.5
45.7
7.4
24
190.1
252.0
45.6
0.45
45.3
45.8
7.7
25
198.0
264.4
49.5
0.45
46.1
46.0
8.0
26
210.2
276.8
53.5
0.45
46.8
46.2
8.3
27
226.1
289.1
57.7
0.45
47.4
46.3
8.6
28
241.9
301.5
62.1
0.45
48.0
46.4
9.0
29
257.8
313.9
66.6
0.45
48.8
46.6
9.3
30
273.6
326.3
71.3
0.45
49.6
46.7
9.6
31
289.4
338.6
76.1
0.45
50.3
46.8
9.9
32
307.0
351.0
81.1
0.45
51.0
46.9
10.2
33
324.9
363.4
86.2
0.45
51.6
47.0
10.6
34
332.0
375.0
92.5
0.50
52.2
47.1
10.9
35
350.0
387.5
98.0
0.50
52.8
47.1
11.2
36
368.0
400.0
103.7
0.50
53.3
47.2
11.5
37
386.0
412.5
109.5
0.50
53.8
47.3
11.8
38
404.0
425.0
115.5
0.50
54.3
47.4
12.2
39
422.0
437.5
121.7
0.50
54.8
47.4
12.5
40
440.0
450.0
128.0
0.50
55.2
47.5
12.8
OCTOBER 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
3-15
Table 3.4.1.2
Maximum Unfactored HL-93 Live Load Moments, Shears, and Reactions
Simple Spans, One Lane, w/o Dynamic Load Allowance
Span
Moments
Shears and End Reactions
Truck
Tandem
Lane
Span Pt.
Truck
Tandem
Lane
(kip-ft)
(kip-ft)
(kip-ft)
(%)
(kip)
(kip)
(kip)
42
485.2
474.8
139.7
0.45
56.0
47.6
13.4
44
520.9
499.5
153.3
0.45
56.7
47.7
14.1
46
556.5
524.3
167.6
0.45
57.4
47.8
14.7
48
592.2
549.0
182.5
0.45
58.0
47.9
15.4
50
627.8
573.8
198.0
0.45
58.6
48.0
16.0
52
663.4
598.5
214.2
0.45
59.1
48.1
16.6
54
699.1
623.3
230.9
0.45
59.6
48.1
17.3
56
734.7
648.0
248.4
0.45
60.0
48.2
17.9
58
770.4
672.8
266.4
0.45
60.4
48.3
18.6
60
806.0
697.5
285.1
0.45
60.8
48.3
19.2
62
841.6
722.3
304.4
0.45
61.2
48.4
19.8
64
877.3
747.0
324.4
0.45
61.5
48.4
20.5
66
912.9
771.8
345.0
0.45
61.8
48.5
21.1
68
948.6
796.5
366.2
0.45
62.1
48.5
21.8
70
984.2
821.3
388.1
0.45
62.4
48.6
22.4
75
1070.0
887.5
450.0
0.50
63.0
48.7
24.0
80
1160.0
950.0
512.0
0.50
63.6
48.8
25.6
85
1250.0
1012.5
578.0
0.50
64.1
48.8
27.2
90
1340.0
1075.0
648.0
0.50
64.5
48.9
28.8
95
1430.0
1137.5
722.0
0.50
64.9
48.9
30.4
100
1520.0
1200.0
800.0
0.50
65.3
49.0
32.0
110
1700.0
1325.0
968.0
0.50
65.9
49.1
35.2
120
1880.0
1450.0
1152.0
0.50
66.4
49.2
38.4
130
2060.0
1575.0
1352.0
0.50
66.8
49.2
41.6
140
2240.0
1700.0
1568.0
0.50
67.2
49.3
44.8
150
2420.0
1825.0
1800.0
0.50
67.5
49.3
48.0
160
2600.0
1950.0
2048.0
0.50
67.8
49.4
51.2
170
2780.0
2075.0
2312.0
0.50
68.0
49.4
54.4
180
2960.0
2200.0
2592.0
0.50
68.3
49.4
57.6
190
3140.0
2325.0
2888.0
0.50
68.5
49.5
60.8
200
3320.0
2450.0
3200.0
0.50
68.6
49.5
64.0
(ft)
OCTOBER 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
[ This Page Intentionally Left Blank ]
3-16
JULY 2003
4. STRUCTURAL
ANALYSIS AND
EVALUATION
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
4-1
The analysis of bridges and structures is a mixture of science and

engineering judgement. In most cases, simple models with conservative
assumptions can be used to arrive at the design forces for various
elements. For example, for straight beam bridges with small skews,
beam line models with approximate distribution factors can be used to
arrive at the design moments, shears and reactions. For more complex
structures or for situations where refinement offers significant benefits, a
more refined analysis (e.g., grid or 3-D) might be justified. Situations
where this might be appropriate include curved bridges, bridges with
large skews, or when evaluating the critical element of a bridge with
marginal live load capacity.
In all but the most complex bridges, time-dependent behavior will not be
modeled.
The impacts of creep, shrinkage, and relaxation will be
accounted for by using code prescribed equations for these effects. While
time-dependent material effects are not modeled, designers and
evaluators of continuous post-tensioned structures should include
secondary moments due to post-tensioning in their analysis.
Satisfying force equilibrium and identifying a load path to adequately
transfer the loads to the foundations is the primary analysis goal for
designers.
The remainder of this section contains guidance on a variety of topics.
Topics include computer programs, load distribution, load rating,
substructure fixity, and lastly, LRFD exceptions.
4.1 Computer
Programs
[4.4]
Engineering software and spreadsheets play a large role in the design of

bridges. The Bridge Office evaluates software and develops spreadsheets
to assist office personnel.
This process does not remove the
responsibility of the designer to verify (through hand calculations, other
programs, past experience, etc.) that results are accurate.
The
Automation Engineer maintains a list of spreadsheets and programs that
may be used by in-house designers.
Programs used by consultants must be able to replicate the results of the
design examples given in this manual to verify program compliance.
Portions of programs not giving similar results will require hand
computations to demonstrate conformance. Mn/DOT does not require
that the name, version, and release date of the software used for the
design be identified in the contract documents. However, as part of the
consultants QA/QC program, software must be verified per the above
requirements.
OCTOBER 2006
4.2 Load
Distribution
[4.6.2]
4.2.1 Dead Load

Distribution
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
4-2
The LRFD Specifications encourage the use of either refined or

approximate methods of analysis. An approximate method of analysis
can be utilized to determine the lateral live load distribution to individual
girders for typical highway bridges. Lateral live load distribution factors
are dependent on multiple characteristics of each bridge. There are
specific ranges of applicability for the use of approximate methods of
analysis. Extending the application of such approximate methods beyond
the limits requires sound and reasonable judgement. Otherwise refined
analytical methods should be used.
Deck, Wearing Course, Future Wearing Surface, Railing, Barriers,

and Medians
For beam bridges the dead load of the deck is distributed to the beams
based on their respective tributary widths. Superimposed dead loads
(wearing course, future wearing surface, railings, barriers, and medians),
with the exception of sidewalk loads, are to be distributed equally to all
beam lines.
For concrete slab bridges (reinforced or post-tensioned) the weight of the
barrier loads should be distributed to the edge strip. For design of the
interior strip, the weight of the barriers should be distributed across the
entire width of the slab and combined with other superimposed dead
loads.
Sidewalks
Distribute sidewalk loads to the beams by simple distribution except
when checking load case 2 as specified in Article 4.2.3 of this manual.
Miscellaneous Loads Conduits, Sign Structure, etc.
Conduit loads supported by hangers attached to the deck should be
distributed equally to all beams. Sign structures, architectural treatment
panels, and sound walls, whose load acts entirely outside the exterior
beam, should be assumed to be carried by the exterior beam.
4.2.2 Live Load

Distribution
Equations and tables for live load distribution factors are provided in the
LRFD Specifications. For typical beam bridges distribution factors are
provided for interior beam flexure (single lane, multiple lanes, and
fatigue), and interior beam shear (single lane, multiple lanes, and
fatigue). The lever rule and distribution formulas should be used to
determine the amount of live load carried by the exterior beam. LRFD
C4.6.2.2.2d provides a formula for computation of an additional
distribution factor for bridges that have diaphragms or cross frames. Use
OCTOBER 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
4-3
of the rigid cross section or pile equation distribution factor is not

required for design of exterior beams.
4.2.2.1 Steel and

Prestressed
Concrete Beams
Unlike the Standard Specifications, the live load distribution factors

(LLDF) for beam bridges are dependent on the stiffness of the
components that make up the cross section [LRFD Equation 4.6.2.2.1-1].
Theoretically, the distribution factor changes for each change in cross
section. However, this is more refinement than is necessary. For simple
span structures a single LLDF (computed at midspan) may be used. For
continuous structures, a single LLDF may be used for each positive
moment region and for each negative moment region, with the moment
regions defined by the dead load contraflexure points. For bridges with
consistent geometry (same number of beam lines in each span, etc.) the
largest positive moment LLDF may be used for all positive moment
locations. Similarly, the largest negative moment LLDF may be used for
all negative moment regions.
For skewed superstructures, use the LLDF for end shear throughout the
length of the girder.
4.2.2.2 Slab Spans

and Timber Decks
[4.6.2.3]
Design concrete slabs and timber decks using a one foot wide longitudinal
strip. The LRFD Specifications provide equations for live load distribution
factors (LLDF) that result in equivalent strip widths, E, that are assumed
to carry one lane of traffic. Convert the equivalent strip width to a live
load distribution factor for the unit strip by taking the reciprocal of the
width.
1
LLDF =
E
4.2.3 Sidewalk
Pedestrian Live
Load
[3.6.1.6]
Unlike the Standard Specifications, no reduction in sidewalk pedestrian

live load intensity based on span length and sidewalk width is provided in
the LRFD Specifications.
Consider two loading cases when designing a beam bridge with a
sidewalk:
1) Use a pedestrian live load on the sidewalk equal to 0.075 ksf and
apply it in conjunction with a vehicular live load in the traffic lanes
adjacent to the sidewalk. Use the lever rule to determine distribution
of sidewalk dead load, pedestrian live load, and vehicular live load to
outer beams.
OCTOBER 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
4-4
2) Place vehicular live load on the sidewalk and in adjacent traffic lanes
with no pedestrian live load on the sidewalk. For this load case,
assume dead load, including sidewalk, is carried equally by all beams.
4.3 Load Rating
The bridge load rating determines the safe load carrying capacity.
Ratings are calculated for a new bridge and are recalculated throughout
the bridges life as changes occur.
Unlike design where only one benchmark or level of safety is used, two
different levels have historically been used for load rating. These rating
levels are referred to as the inventory rating and operating rating.
The inventory rating corresponds to the factors of safety or levels of
reliability associated with new bridge designs. The operating rating
corresponds to slightly relaxed safety factors or reliability indices and is
used for infrequent, regulated loads. Calculations for overload permit
evaluations and for bridge weight postings are made at the operating
level.
Bridge Ratings are done according to the AASHTO Manual for Condition
Evaluation of Bridges. (Much of this document defers to the AASHTO
Standard Design Specifications for Highway Bridges.) New bridge ratings
are made using LFD methods.
The Design Data block on the front sheet of a set of bridge plans should
contain the HS Operating Rating for the bridge.
When the bridge plan is to the point where all the essential information
for the superstructure is shown, the plan should be sent to the Bridge
Rating Unit. They will calculate the operating rating for the bridge.
Bridges designed for the local road system are generally prepared by the
local agency and/or their consultants. It is the responsibility of the local
agency to assure that ratings are calculated and reported to the Bridge
Management Unit.
OCTOBER 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
4-5
The rating software in use by the Bridge Rating Unit does not rate the
following types of bridges:
post-tensioned continuous concrete, both segmental and
non-segmental
curved steel
arches
rigid frames
continuous trusses
suspension and cable stayed bridges
single point bridges.
For these bridges, the designer should compute the rating in accordance
with the following guidelines:
Do not include allowances for future dead loads, such as a future wearing
surface. Rate an interior beam under traffic. Use the same lateral dead
and live load distribution used for design. The Load Factor Method is
preferred.
In addition to rating, a provision is needed to evaluate trucks that apply
for overload permits. If the design software will accept custom truck
configurations, the Standard Mn/DOT Overload Permit Trucks should be
run. Attached are diagrams for these trucks. For this report the lowest
or critical rating factor should be reported for each truck as illustrated in
the attached example.
If custom trucks cannot be run, influence lines should be developed for
the critical locations of negative and positive moment (and shear if
critical). Additional information needed at each of these locations is the
moment (or shear) capacity, dead load effects, secondary prestress
effects, and the capacity remaining for live load and impact. These
should all be equated to the width of one beam spacing. State the load
factors, capacity reduction factors, and live load distribution that were
applied.
Bridge rating forms can be downloaded from the Mn/DOT Bridge Office
Completed reports
Web site (http://www.dot.state.mn.us/bridge/).
should be given to the Bridge Rating Engineer. The complete submittal
should include plan sheets necessary to convey the essential information
used in the rating including the general plan and elevation, the deck
cross section, the framing plan, and the beam elevation.
Any questions about this procedure should be directed to the Bridge
Rating Engineer.
OCTOBER 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
4-6
OCTOBER 2006
4.4 Substructure
Fixity
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
4-7
The overall fixity of the bridge should be examined in detail for bridges
on steep grades, moderate to severe curvature, or when the columns are
tall or slender. The following guidelines for providing fixity at bearings
should be followed.
For short bridges on steep grades, the down hill abutment should be
fixed. For longer bridges the flexibility of each pier and its bearings need
to be considered to determine the appropriate substructure units to fix.
If pier flexibility and geometry permit, a minimum of two fixed piers per
expansion unit should be used. For very flexible piers, such as pile bents
or slender columns, the expansion bearings may be redundant (the pier
may move before the bearings begin to slide).
For typical prestressed I-beam bridges with two sets of bearings on each
pier (per beam line), sufficient anchorage to the pier is provided by using
one line of bearings with anchor rods at a fixed pier. For river piers and
for spans over 145 feet designers should fix both sets of bearings.
See Section 14 of this manual for additional guidance.
4.5 Structural
Models
For redundant structures, the distribution of internal forces is dependent

on member stiffnesses. Engineering judgement needs to be exercised
when assigning member properties and boundary conditions to determine
the internal forces of members.
Often a simplified method can be used to arrive at a solution. For
example, instead of setting up a continuous beam model, design
moments in pile bent pier caps can be determined in the following
manner: Positive moment requirements can be determined by assuming
simple spans between the supporting piles.
The required negative
moment capacity can be computed assuming a propped cantilever for the
outside spans and fixed/fixed boundary conditions for the interior spans.
4.6 LRFD
Exceptions
The LRFD Specifications are comprehensive. In addition to an updated

design methodology, the new specifications also include information that
has not been included in the Standard Specifications. For example, the
LRFD Specifications contain guidance for vessel impact loads that
previously were contained in the Guide Specification and Commentary for
Vessel Collision Design of Highway Bridges. However, not all AASHTO
design guidance has been incorporated in the LRFD Specifications. A few
OCTOBER 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
4-8
special topics have not yet been incorporated into the new specification.
Information on these topics is given below.
4.6.1 Pedestrian
Bridges
Design pedestrian bridges in accordance with the Guide Specifications for

Design of Pedestrian Bridges. Although LRFD does specify pedestrian live
load, the guide specifications more fully address the design of pedestrian
bridges.
4.6.2
Rehabilitation
Projects
When rehabilitating older existing bridges, it is often not economically

feasible to design the rehabilitated structure to meet all current design
code requirements, including live load capacity.
To help establish
uniform procedures for use on bridge renovation projects, Mn/DOT
These
developed Bridge Improvement and Replacement Guidelines.
guidelines are updated at two year intervals and provide specific
information such as; minimum roadway widths, live load requirements,
minimum railing standards and other criteria that must be incorporated
into the design of a renovated structure. The designer should refer to the
guidelines for specific information regarding live load requirements.
The bridge designer will also receive a copy of a Bridge Repair
Recommendation for each bridge in a proposed renovation project. The
Mn/DOT Regional Bridge Construction Engineer prepares the
recommendation in accordance with the aforementioned guidelines, and
specifies all of the necessary modifications to be included in the bridge
repair project.
4.6.3 Railroad
Bridges and
Bridges or
Structures near
Railroads
Railroad bridges are to be designed in accordance with the most current

American Railway Engineering and Maintenance-of-Way Association
(AREMA) Specifications.
Designers should be aware that often times railroads have specific criteria
for structural design of items carrying their tracks or in the vicinity of
their tracks. The criteria varies from railroad to railroad. For example,
the Duluth Mesabe & Iron Range Railway has a special live load. Other
railroads have specific loading criteria and geometric limits for
excavations near their tracks.
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-1
5. CONCRETE
STRUCTURES
Reinforced and prestressed concrete are used extensively in bridge

projects. In addition to general design guidance and information on
detailing practices, this section contains three design examples: a threespan reinforced concrete slab superstructure, a 72 inch pretensioned
I-beam, and a three-span post-tensioned concrete slab superstructure.
5.1 Materials
For most projects, conventional materials should be specified. Standard

materials are described in two locations: Mn/DOTs Standard
Specifications for Construction (Mn/DOT Spec.) and Bridge Special
Provisions.
If multiple types of concrete or reinforcement are to be used in a project,
it is the designers responsibility to clearly show on the plans the amount
of each material to be provided and where it is to be placed.
5.1.1 Concrete
Mn/DOT Spec. 2461 identifies and describes concrete mix types. Based
on their strength, location of application, and durability properties,
different mixes are used for various structural concrete components.
Table 5.1.1.1 identifies the concrete mix types to be used in various
locations of the state for decks, slabs, railings, medians, and sidewalks.
The four or five characters used to identify a concrete mix provide
information on the properties of the mix. The first character designates
the type of concrete (with or without air entrainment requirements). The
second character identifies the grade of concrete.
Each letter is
associated with a different cement-void ratio. The third character in the
label is the upper limit for the slump in inches. The fourth character
identifies the coarse aggregate gradation. The fifth character, if present,
identifies the type of coarse aggregate to be used.
The various concrete types used throughout the state are a result of the
different aggregates that are available in the region (a consequence of
the regions geology).
Table 5.1.1.2 identifies the standard Mn/DOT concrete mixes to be used
for various bridge components. In general, the standard concrete design
strength is 4 ksi, and air entrained concretes are to be used for
components located above footings and pile caps to enhance durability.
MAY 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-2
Table 5.1.1.1
Deck, Slab, Railing, Median, and Sidewalk
Concrete Mixes
District
Element
District 4
Deck or Slab
(Without Wearing Course)
Deck or Slab
(With Wearing Course)
Railings, Medians, and
Sidewalks
District
1, 2, 3
6, 7
and Metro
and 8
3Y33
3Y33
3Y33A
3Y36
3Y36
3Y36A
3Y46A
3Y46
3Y46A
Table 5.1.1.2
Design Concrete Mix Summary
Design Compressive
Maximum Aggregate
Strength (ksi)
Size (in)
1X62
5.0
1C62
3.0
1X46
5.0
/4
1Y46
4.0
/4
1A43
4.0
1 1/2
3Y43
4.0
1 1/2
4.0
1 1/2 or
4.0
1 1/2
Location/Element
Mn/DOT Mix Designation
Cofferdam seals
Fill from top of rock to bottom of footing for
spread footings, and cast-in-place concrete
piles
Drilled shafts
Footings and pile caps
Abutment stem and wingwalls
Pier columns and caps
Integral abutment and
Same mix as used in
continuity pier diaphragms
deck
Other diaphragms
3Y43
Pretensioned superstructures
Cast-in-place box girders
1W36, 3W36,
5.0 9.0 at final
or special
4.5 7.5 at initial
3U36 modified
6.0
Deck, slabs, railings, medians,
3Y33, 3Y33A, 3Y36,
and sidewalks
3Y36A, 3Y46, or 3Y46A
Concrete wearing course
3U17A
4.0
Pedestrian bridge deck or slab
3Y33, 3Y33A
4.0
3W36
5.0 or higher
Precast box culverts, arches,

and 3-sided structures
4.0
/4
/4
1 1/2 or
5
/8
1 1/2
3
/4
/4
/4
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-3
Reinforced Concrete Sections

Base concrete modulus of elasticity computations on a unit weight of
0.145 kcf. Use a unit weight of 0.150 kcf for dead load calculations.
For structural modeling (determining design forces and deflections), use
gross section properties or effective section properties. If the structure is
redundant and contains nonprismatic members, the structural model
should be constructed with nonprismatic elements.
For concrete elements with compressive strengths less than or equal to
6.0 ksi, use:
E c = 33,000 w c1.5
fc
For checks based on strength (design of reinforcement, maximum

reinforcement), use conventional strength methods (reinforcement
yielding, Whitney equivalent stress block, etc.).
For checks based on service loads (fatigue, crack control, etc.), use
cracked sections with reinforcing steel transformed to an equivalent
amount of concrete.
Prestressed Concrete Beams
When computing section properties, use a modular ratio of 1 for the
prestressing strands.
For beams fabricated with high-strength concrete (greater than 6.0 ksi),
the modulus of elasticity is to be computed with an equation (ACI 363)
different from that found in LRFD Article 5.4.2.4:
Ec = 1265
fc + 1000
(where fc and E c are in ksi)
When computing dead loads, use a unit weight of 0.155 kcf.

Table 5.1.1.3 summarizes the concrete properties to use for analysis and
design:
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-4
Table 5.1.1.3
Concrete Properties
Parameter
Modulus of Elasticity
Equation/Value
Ec (ksi) = 33000 wc1.5 fc (ksi)
Ec (ksi) = 1265 fc (ksi) + 1000
Thermal Coefficient
Shrinkage Strain
Poisson's ratio
5.1.2 Reinforcing
Steel
when fc 6 ksi
when fc > 6 ksi
c = 6.0 10 6 = in /in/F
sh = 0.0002 in /in at 28 days
sh = 0.0005 in /in at 1 year
= 0.2
Reinforcing bars shall satisfy Mn/DOT Spec 3301. Grade 60 deformed

bars (black or epoxy coated) should be used in most circumstances. In
specialized situations and with the approval of the Bridge Design
Engineer, welding to reinforcement may be used. ASTM A706 bars must
be used for applications involving welding.
The modulus of elasticity for mild steel reinforcing (Es) is 29,000 ksi.
All reinforcement bars except those that are entirely embedded in
footings shall be epoxy coated.
5.1.3
Reinforcement Bar
Couplers
Contractors select reinforcement bar couplers that meet the requirements

stated in the special provisions. In general, the connectors need to:
Provide a capacity that is 125% of the nominal bar capacity.
Be epoxy coated.
Satisfy the fatigue testing requirements of NCHRP Project 10-35
(12 ksi)
5.1.4 Prestressing
Steel
Uncoated low-relaxation 7-wire strand or uncoated deformed, highstrength bars are acceptable prestressing steels. Strands shall conform
to ASTM A416. Bars shall conform to ASTM A722.
The modulus of elasticity for prestressing steels is:
Ep = 28,500 ksi for strands
Ep = 30,000 ksi for bars
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-5
Standard 7-wire prestressing strand areas are:

3
/8" diameter strand:
0.085 in 2 /strand
1
/2" diameter strand:
0.153 in 2 /strand
0.6" diameter strand:
0.217 in 2 /strand
5.1.5
Post-tensioning
Hardware
For post-tensioned concrete bridges, open ducts must be used for tendon
passageways through the superstructure. Longitudinal ducts are typically
made of galvanized steel tubing 3 to 4 inches in diameter and must be
sufficiently rigid to withstand the loads imposed upon them. Transverse
ducts may be made of corrugated plastic containing from 1 to 4 strands.
Because the transverse ducts are relatively close to the top of the deck
with heavy applications of corrosive de-icing chemicals, plastic ducts are
desirable.
Tendon anchorage devices are required at the ends of each duct.
Anchorages should be shown or indicated on the drawings. Detailing is
unnecessary because the post-tensioning supplier will provide these
details in the shop drawings for the post-tensioning system.
5.2 Reinforcement
Details
Practices for detailing a variety of reinforced concrete elements are

presented in this section. These include standard concrete cover and bar
spacing dimensions, plus a variety of specific design and detailing
instructions.
Reinforcing details are intended to provide a durable structure with
straightforward details. The details must be constructible, allowing steel
to be placed without undue effort and providing adequate space between
reinforcement to permit the placement of concrete.
5.2.1 Minimum
Clear Cover and
Clear Spacing
The minimum clear cover dimension to reinforcement varies with the

location in the bridge. It varies with how the component is constructed
(precast, cast in forms, cast against earth) and the exposure the element
has to de-icing salts. In general, minimum covers increase as control
over concrete placement decreases and as the anticipated exposure to
de-icing salts increases.
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-6
Foundations
Top Bars
Minimum clear cover is 3 inches.
Bottom Bars, Spread Footing
Minimum clear cover to the bottom concrete surface
5 inches.
Minimum clear cover to the side concrete surface is 3 inches.
Bottom Bars, Pile cap w/ pile embedded 1 foot
Rest directly on top of trimmed pile.
Bottom Bars, Pile cap w/ pile embedded more than 1 foot
Minimum clear cover is 3 inches.
is
Abutments and Piers

Standard minimum clear cover for all bars is 2 inches (vertical and
horizontal).
At rustications, the minimum horizontal clear cover varies with the
size of the recess. For recesses less than or equal to 1 inch in depth
and less than or equal to 1 inch in width, the minimum clear cover is
1.5 inches. For all other cases, the minimum clear cover is 2 inches.
Minimum clear distance between reinforcement and anchor rods is
2 inches.
Decks and Slabs
Top Bars, Roadway Bridge Deck or Slab
Minimum clear cover to the top concrete surface is 3 inches.
Minimum horizontal clear cover is 2 inches.
Top Bars, Pedestrian Bridge Deck
Minimum clear cover to the top concrete surface is 2 inches.
Bottom Bars, Deck
Minimum clear cover to the bottom concrete surface is 1 inch.
Minimum horizontal clear cover from the end of the bar to the face
of the concrete element is 4 inches.
Minimum horizontal clear cover from the side of a bar to the face
Bottom Bars, Slab
Minimum clear cover to the bottom concrete surface is 1.5 inches.
Minimum horizontal clear cover from the end of the bar to the face
Minimum horizontal clear cover from the side of a bar to the face
OCTOBER 2004
5.2.2 Reinforcing
Bar Lists
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-7
For numbering of reinforcing bars, the first character is a unique alpha

character for the given structural element. The first two digits of the bar
mark indicate the bar size. (These digits are based on metric bar sizes.
Reinforcing steel mills have converted their operations to stamp bars with
metric identifying marks. To simplify construction inspection procedures,
bar marks are based on metric bar sizes.) The last two digits are the
bars unique sequential number in the bar list for that substructure or
superstructure unit. A suffix E indicates the bar is epoxy coated.
For example, an A1903E bar could be decoded as follows:
A 19 03 E
Epoxy coated bar
Bar number 3 for this structural unit
Size of bar is #19
Abutment
The cross-sectional areas, diameters, and weights of standard reinforcing
bars are provided in Table 5.2.2.1.
Table 5.2.2.1
Reinforcing Steel Sizes and Properties
Area of Bar
(in 2 )
Diameter of Bar
Weight of Bar
Bar Size
(in)
(lb/ft)
#10
#3
0.11
0.375
0.376
#13
#4
0.20
0.500
0.668
#16
#5
0.31
0.625
1.043
#19
#6
0.44
0.750
1.502
#22
#7
0.60
0.875
2.044
#25
#8
0.79
1.000
2.670
#29
#9
1.00
1.128
3.400
#32
#10
1.27
1.270
4.303
#36
#11
1.56
1.410
5.313
#43
#14
2.25
1.693
7.65
#57
#18
4.00
2.257
13.60
Metric Bar Size
U.S. Customary
Table 5.2.2.2 lists the reinforcing steel area provided (per foot) for
different sized bars with different center to center bar spacings.
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-8
Spacing of Bars in Inches

(in)
Nominal
Diameter
Number
Bar Size
Table 5.2.2.2
Average Area per Foot Width Provided by Various Bar Spacings
(in 2 /ft)
3.5
4.5
5.5
10
11
12
10
0.375
0.44 0.38 0.33 0.29 0.26 0.24 0.22 0.19 0.17 0.15 0.13 0.12 0.11
13
0.500
0.80 0.69 0.60 0.53 0.48 0.44 0.40 0.34 0.30 0.27 0.24 0.22 0.20
16
0.625
1.24 1.06 0.93 0.83 0.74 0.68 0.62 0.53 0.47 0.41 0.37 0.34 0.31
19
0.750
1.76 1.51 1.32 1.17 1.06 0.96 0.88 0.75 0.66 0.59 0.53 0.48 0.44
22
0.875
2.40 2.06 1.80 1.60 1.44 1.31 1.20 1.03 0.90 0.80 0.72 0.65 0.60
25
1.000
3.16 2.71 2.37 2.11 1.90 1.72 1.58 1.35 1.19 1.05 0.95 0.86 0.79
29
1.128
4.00 3.43 3.00 2.67 2.40 2.18 2.00 1.71 1.50 1.33 1.20 1.09 1.00
32
1.270
---
36
1.410
---
**
4.35 3.81 3.39 3.05 2.77 2.54 2.18 1.91 1.69 1.52 1.39 1.27
---
4.68 4.16 3.74 3.40 3.12 2.67 2.34 2.08 1.87 1.70 1.56
Per LRFD 5.10.3.1.1, the minimum clear distance between

bars in a layer shall be the greatest of:
1) 1.5 times the nominal diameter of the bar
2) 1.5 times the maximum size of the coarse aggregate **
3) 1.5 inches
Per 2000 Mn/DOT Standard Specifications for Construction
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-9
The weight of spiral reinforcement on a per foot basis is provided in Table

5.2.2.3. The standard spiral reinforcement is 1/2 inch diameter with a
3 inch pitch. When selecting the size of round columns, use outside
dimensions that are consistent with cover requirements and standard
spiral outside diameters.
Figure 5.2.2.1 contains design tables that list assorted development
lengths for 60 ksi reinforcement in 4 ksi concrete.
Figure 5.2.2.2 contains tension lap splice design tables. Knowing the size
of bar, the location of the bar, and the class of splice, designers can
readily find the appropriate lap length. The tables are based on 60 ksi
epoxy coated reinforcement and 4 ksi concrete.
Figure 5.2.2.3 contains graphics that illustrate acceptable methods for
anchoring or lapping stirrup reinforcement. Open stirrups must have the
open end anchored in the compression side of the member. This
anchorage consists of development of the bar or hook prior to reaching a
depth of d/2 or placing the hooks around longitudinal reinforcement.
Detail closed double stirrups with a Class C lap.
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-10
Table 5.2.2.3
Weight of Spiral Reinforcement
WEIGHTS IN POUNDS PER FOOT OF HEIGHT
O.D.
SPIRAL
(in)
/8" DIA. ROD
/2" DIA. ROD
6" PITCH
3" PITCH
(lb/ft)
(lb)
(lb/ft)
(lb)
24
4.72
7.1
16.79
12.60
26
5.12
7.7
18.19
13.65
28
5.51
8.3
19.59
14.70
30
5.91
8.9
20.99
15.75
32
6.30
9.5
22.38
16.80
34
6.69
10.1
23.78
17.85
36
7.09
10.7
25.18
18.90
38
7.48
11.2
26.58
20.00
40
7.87
11.8
27.98
21.00
42
8.27
12.4
29.38
22.00
44
8.66
13.0
30.78
23.10
46
9.06
13.6
32.18
24.10
48
9.45
14.2
33.58
25.20
50
9.84
14.8
34.98
26.20
52
10.24
15.4
36.38
27.30
54
10.63
15.9
37.77
28.30
56
11.02
16.5
39.17
29.40
58
11.42
17.1
40.57
30.40
60
11.81
17.7
41.97
31.50
62
12.21
18.3
43.37
32.50
64
12.60
18.9
44.77
33.60
66
12.99
19.5
46.17
34.60
68
13.39
20.1
47.57
35.70
For more complete coverage, see CRSI Design Handbook.

Total weight = (wt. per ft x height) + F
F = weight to add for finishing
(this includes 11/2 turns at the top and 11/2 turns at the bottom of spiral)
For additional information see Mn/DOT 2472 and AASHTO LRFD 5.10.6.2
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 5.2.2.1
Reinforcement Data
5-11
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 5.2.2.2
Reinforcement Data
5-12
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 5.2.2.3
Reinforcement Data
5-13
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-14
5.2.3 General
Reinforcement
Practices
Reinforcement practices follow those shown by the Concrete Reinforcing

Steel Institute (C.R.S.I.) in the Manual of Standard Practice. These
practices include:
1) For bent bars, omit the last length dimension on reinforcement bar
details.
2) Use standard length bars for all but the last bar in long bar runs.
3) Use a maximum length of 60 feet for #13 deck or slab bars and
40 feet for other applications.
4) Use a maximum length of 60 feet for bars #16 and larger.
5) Recognize that bar cutting and bending tolerances are 1 inch for bars
and that this tolerance is important for long straight bars that do not
have lap splices to provide dimensional flexibility.
6) Reinforcement bars longer than 60 feet or larger than #36 are
available only on special order, and should be avoided. Designers
should check with the Bridge Design Engineer before using special
order sizes or lengths.
5.2.4
Reinforcement Bar
Couplers
Reinforcement bar couplers are expensive compared to conventional lap

splices. Where lap splices cannot be readily used (bridge widening
projects, for example), couplers should be considered. Where possible,
reinforcement bar couplers should be staggered to distribute the
additional stiffness of the couplers.
5.2.5 Adhesive
Anchors
Similar to bar couplers, adhesive anchors are expensive. Adhesive

anchors are typically used to attach secondary structural members to
new concrete or primary structural members to existing (old) concrete. A
typical use is to attach a metal rail to a concrete base.
OCTOBER 2004
5.2.6 Shrinkage
and Temperature
Reinforcement
[5.10.8]
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-15
Slabs and Decks

Curves illustrating the necessary reinforcing for slabs and decks to satisfy
LRFD 5.10.8.2 are provided in Figure 5.2.6.1.
Example
For a slab 24" thick: Use #16 bars @ 14" or use #13 bars @ 9" to
meet temperature and shrinkage requirements.
SHRINKAGE AND TEMPERATURE

REINFORCEMENT FOR SLABS AND DECKS
20.0
#13
#16
18.0
#19
MAXIMUM SPACING (inches)
16.0
14.0
12.0
10.0
8.0
6.0
4.0
2.0
6
12
18
24
30
MEMBER THICKNESS (inches)

PER AASHTO LRFD 5.10.8.2 CONCRETE
COMPONENTS LESS THAN 48 INCHES THICK
Figure 5.2.6.1
36
42
48
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-16
Members Other than Slabs and Decks

Curves illustrating the necessary reinforcing for members other than
slabs and decks to satisfy LRFD 5.10.8.2 are provided in Figure 5.2.6.2.
Example
For a wall 26" thick: Use #13 bars @ 10" to meet temperature and
shrinkage requirements.
SHRINKAGE AND TEMPERATURE REINFORCEMENT

FOR MEMBERS OTHER THAN SLABS AND DECKS
20.0
#13
#16
18.0
#19
MAXIMUM SPACING (inches)
16.0
14.0
12.0
10.0
8.0
6.0
4.0
2.0
6
12
18
24
30
36
42
48
MEMBER THICKNESS (inches)

PER AASHTO LRFD 5.10.8.2 CONCRETE
COMPONENTS LESS THAN 48 INCHES THICK
Figure 5.2.6.2
Mass Concrete
Note that the current LRFD 5.10.8.3 mass concrete provisions (for
members whose least dimension exceeds 48 inches) have been found to
be confusing. Therefore, in lieu of LRFD 5.10.8.3, use #19 bars spaced
at 12 inches for members over 48 inches thick.
NOVEMBER 2005
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-17
5.3 Concrete Slabs
In many bridge engineering documents the terms concrete slab and

concrete deck are used interchangeably. Within this manual, concrete
slab will refer to a superstructure type without supporting beam
elements. In most cases, the primary reinforcement for slabs is parallel
to the centerline of roadway. Likewise, within this manual concrete
decks will refer to the superstructure element placed on top of beams or
girders. In most cases, the primary reinforcement for a concrete deck is
transverse to the centerline of roadway. Practices for concrete decks are
described in Section 9 of this manual.
5.3.1 Geometry
The maximum span lengths for concrete slabs are as follows:

Number of Spans
Without Haunches
With Haunches
30 ft
40 ft
40 ft
50 ft
3 or 4
50 ft
60 ft
End spans should be approximately 80% of the center span length to

balance moments and prevent uplift.
LRFD Table 2.5.2.6.3-1 provides guidance for recommended minimum
structure depth as a function of span length for slab superstructures
without haunches.
When haunches are required, use linear haunches in accordance with the
following:
S + 10
Minimum slab depth at pier = 1.33
30
(includes wear course if present)
S + 10
Minimum slab depth in non-haunched area = 0.8
30
(includes wear course if present)
Minimum haunch length L = 0.15 S

(where S is the length of longest span)
5.3.2
Design/Analysis
Skew can be ignored for slab bridges with skew angles of 20 or less.
Place transverse reinforcement parallel to substructures.
For slab bridges with skew angles between 20 and 45
Perform a two-dimensional plate analysis.
Place transverse reinforcement normal to the bridge centerline.
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-18
Slab type bridges are not allowed for bridges with skew angles greater
than 45.
Slab bridges curved in plan may be designed as if straight. Designers
should consider and investigate the need for providing additional
reinforcement in the portion of the slab outside of chord lines connecting
substructure units.
Do not include the concrete wearing course in section properties when
performing strength and serviceability checks. This will ensure that the
slab has adequate capacity if traffic is carried on the bridge during
operations associated with milling off the old wearing course and the
placement of a new wearing course. An exception to this is when
checking the top reinforcement in the negative moment region for
flexural crack control.
Determine reinforcement bar cutoff points based
serviceability, and minimum reinforcement requirements.
on
strength,
Check one-way shear in slab bridges. Assume that the live load is
distributed over the entire width of the superstructure. Load all lanes
and use the appropriate multiple presence factor.
5.3.3 Exterior Strip

[LRFD 4.6.2.1.4b]
Outside edges of slab bridges contain the exterior strip or edge beam. At
a minimum, the exterior strip reinforcement must match that of the
interior portions of the bridge. Use an exterior strip width of 72 inches.
Special consideration for the design of edge beams is required for bridges
with sidewalks. Separately poured sidewalks may be considered to act
compositely with the slab when adequate means of shear transfer at the
interface is provided.
5.3.4
Reinforcement
Layout
Use the following guidelines for layout of reinforcement in a simple span

slab bridge (see example in Figure 5.3.4.1):
Interior strip reinforcement
Top longitudinal 1 spacing, 1 bar size
Bottom longitudinal 2 spacings, 1 bar size
Exterior strip reinforcement
Top longitudinal 1 spacing, 1 bar size
Transverse reinforcement 1 spacing, 1 bar size
NOVEMBER 2005
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-19
Use the following guidelines for layout of reinforcement in a continuous

slab bridge:
Option 1 (see example in Figure 5.3.4.2):
Top longitudinal 2 spacings, 1 bar size
Top longitudinal 2 spacings, 1 bar size
Option 2 (see example in Figure 5.3.4.3):
Top longitudinal 2 spacings, 2 bar sizes
Bottom longitudinal 2 spacings, 2 bar sizes
Top longitudinal 2 spacings, 2 bar sizes
Bottom longitudinal 2 spacings, 2 bar sizes
Figure 5.3.4.1
NOVEMBER 2005
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 5.3.4.2
Figure 5.3.4.3
5-20
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-21
To simplify placement, detail reinforcement such that top bars are

positioned over bottom bars where possible. For example, if the design
requires bottom longitudinal bars spaced on 10 inch centers, top
longitudinal bars might be spaced on 10 inch centers in positive moment
regions and 5 inch centers in negative moment regions.
Extend railing dowel bars to the bottom layer of slab reinforcement and
provide a horizontal leg for ease of placement.
5.3.5 Camber and

Deflections
[5.7.3.6.2]
In order to obtain the best rideability over the life of the structure,
camber concrete slab bridges for the immediate dead load deflection plus
one half of the long-term deflection. Use gross section properties for
dead load deflection calculations and a long-term creep multiplier of 4.0.
Railings, sidewalks, medians, and wearing courses are not placed while
the slab is supported on falsework. Assume that only the slab carries the
dead load of these elements.
Check live load deflections using the effective moment of inertia. The
effective moment of inertia may be approximated as one half of the gross
moment of inertia. The maximum live load deflection is L/800 for vehicular
bridges that do not carry pedestrians and L/1000 for vehicular bridges that
carry pedestrians.
Consider the concrete wearing course to be functioning compositely with
the slab for live load deflection. Assume the riding surface has lost
1
/2 inch of thickness due to wear.
Use a live load distribution factor equal to the number of lanes times the
multiple presence factor and divide by the width of the slab for the
deflection check.
5.4 Pretensioned
Concrete
The details of pretensioned concrete beams are presented on standard

Bridge Details Part II sheets incorporated into a set of plans. Prepare a
separate sheet for each type of beam in the project. Beams are identical
if they have the same cross-section, strand layout, concrete strengths,
and a similar length. To simplify fabrication and construction, try to
minimize the number of beam types incorporated into a project. Design
exterior beams with a strength equal to or greater than the interior
beams.
NOVEMBER 2005
5.4.1 Geometry
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-22
Provide a minimum stool along centerline of beam that is based on

For dead load
11/2 inches of minimum stool at edge of flange.
computations assume an average stool height equal to the minimum
stool height plus 1 inch. Deck cross slopes, horizontal curves, and
vertical curves all impact the stool height.
There are several Bridge Office practices regarding the type and location
of diaphragms or cross frames for prestressed beam bridges:
1) Design prestressed I-beam bridges without continuity over the piers,
except in the following situations:
a) Bridge is over water with pile bent piers supported by unstable
soils such as fat clay.
b) Bridge is over water with pile bent piers at risk for large ice or
debris loading and pier does not have an encasement wall.
2) Intermediate diaphragms are not required for 14RB, 18RB, 22RB, and
27M beams.
For all other beam sizes, the following applies.
Intermediate diaphragms are not required for single spans of 45'-0"
or less. Provide one intermediate diaphragm at the midspan for
spans between 45'-0" to 90'-0".
Provide two evenly spaced
intermediate diaphragms for spans greater than 90'-0". For spans
over traffic, place additional diaphragms in the fascia bay approached
by traffic to provide bracing against impact from over-height traffic
loads. For two-lane roadways, place one diaphragm approximately
over each shoulder.
For additional lanes, space additional
diaphragms at intervals of about 25'-0" over the roadway.
3) Figure 5.4.1.1 illustrates the typical layout of intermediate
diaphragms at piers for bridges without continuity over the piers.
Locate the centerline of bearing 71/2 inches from the end of the beam.
At piers, provide 2 inches of clearance between the ends of beams.
Provide 3 inches clearance for structures with three or more spans. Note
that the fabrication length tolerance for pretensioned I-beams is 1/8" per
10 feet of length. It may be necessary to cope beam flanges at piers for
bridges with tight horizontal curves or at skewed abutments.
For bridges on significant grades ( 3%) the sloped length of the beam
will be significantly longer than the horizontal length between
substructure units. If the sloped length is 1/2 inch or more than the
horizontal length, identify the sloped length dimension on the beam detail
plan sheets.
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 5.4.1.1
Typical Diaphragm Layout at Piers for Prestressed Concrete Beam Bridge
With Continuous Deck Over Piers
5-23
OCTOBER 2004
5.4.2 Stress Limits
[5.9.3] [5.9.4]
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-24
Similar to the Standard Specifications, the LRFD Specifications identify

service load stress limits for different elements and locations.
For typical prestressed beams, check tension and
load stresses at two stages. The first stage is when
transferred to the beams in the fabricators yard.
after all losses have occurred and the beam is in
bridge.
compression service
the prestress force is
The second stage is
the fully constructed
Design pretensioned beams with a maximum tension at transfer (after

initial losses) of:
0.0948
0.2 ksi
fci
is in ksi)
(where fci
Design pretensioned beams with a maximum tension after all losses of:
0.19
5.4.3
Design/Analysis
fc
(where fc is in ksi)
Use the detailed method provided in LRFD Article 5.9.5 to compute

prestress losses.
Design all pretensioned beams using uncoated low relaxation strands and
epoxy coated mild reinforcement. Both 1/2 inch ( A s = 0.153 in2 ) and
0.6 inch ( A s = 0.217 in2 ) diameter strands are acceptable sizes for use
in pretensioned beams. Fabricators prefer 1/2 inch strands, but use 0.6
inch diameter strands when a beam line can be eliminated.
At the time of prestress transfer (initial), the minimum required concrete
) is 4.5 ksi and the maximum is limited to 7.5 ksi. At the
strength ( fci
termination of the curing period (final), the minimum concrete strength
( fc ) is 5 ksi and the maximum strength is 9 ksi. Higher initial or final
strengths may be used with approval from the Bridge Design Engineer.
An initial concrete strength greater than 7 ksi may add cost to the beam.
The fabricator cannot remove the beam from the bed until a cylinder
break indicates the concrete has reached its specified initial strength.
With strengths higher than 7 ksi, the fabricator may have to leave the
beam in the bed longer than the normal 16-18 hours or add increased
amounts of superplastizer and cement, thereby increasing the cost of the
beam.
If possible, the initial concrete strength should be 0.5 to 1.0 ksi lower
than the final concrete strength. Since concrete naturally gains strength
with age, the final strength of the beam will be more efficiently utilized.
NOVEMBER 2005
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-25
If the calculated initial or final strengths differ by more than 0.3 ksi from
those used in the analysis, reanalyze the beam with the new values.
and
Reanalysis is needed because changes to the concrete strengths fci
fc affect the concrete modulus, which affects the prestress losses and the
composite beam section modulus.
Straight strands must be arranged in a 2 inch grid pattern. See standard
beam sheets for possible strand locations. Arrange draped strands in a
2 inch grid pattern independent of the straight strands. Use draped
at the end of the beam.
strands to reduce the initial required strength fci
Straight strands may be placed in the draped area at 2 inches from the
bottom of the beam. Draped strands must start at 3 inches minimum
from the bottom at the hold-downs and 3 inches minimum from the top
at the end of the beam. Straight strands should be used in place of
draped strands whenever possible.
The maximum number of draped strands allowed at each hold-down
point varies with the fabricator. Therefore, design and detail beams with
1 hold-down on each side of midspan, placed at 0.40L to 0.45L from the
centerline of bearing. The fabricator will provide additional hold-downs
as needed.
Ensure that adequate shear and bursting reinforcement is provided in the
ends of beams. The maximum size for stirrup bars is #16. Based on the
concrete mix used for prestressed beams, the minimum stirrup spacing is
21/2 inches. If the required amount of reinforcement cannot be provided
within h/4 of the end of the beam, provide the remainder at a 21/2 inch
spacing.
The following guidance is provided to designers to evaluate initial and
final stresses to optimize their designs:
Final Stresses
Midpoint Strength at Bottom of Beam
If tension stress is greater than 0.19 fc (0.569 ksi for 9 ksi
concrete), lower the stress by:
1) Add 2 strands to the bottom row of straight and move the
draped strands up 1 inch at midpoint (bottom row of draped at
4 inches).
2) Add 2 strands to the second row of straight and move the
draped strands up 2 inches at midpoint (bottom row of draped
at 6 inches) or add 2 draped strands (bottom row of draped at
4 inches).
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-26
3) Continue to add strands as stated above until 6 straight and 4

draped have been added. If the tension stress is still greater
than 0.569 ksi, consider adding another line of beams to the
bridge. If the tension stress is less than 0.569 ksi, two strands
(either straight or draped) may be removed and the beam
reanalyzed. If the stress becomes greater than 0.569 ksi,
return to the original number of strands.
Initial Stresses
Midpoint Strength at Bottom of Beam
If the required initial strength is greater than 7.5 ksi:
1) Move the center of gravity of the strands up at midpoint of the
beam until either the final concrete strength becomes 9.0 ksi
or the initial strength is 0.5 to 1.0 ksi lower than the final
strength.
2) Remove 2 strands (preferably draped) from the beam and
reanalyze. Keep in mind that changes will affect the required
final strength. If the removing of strands increases the final
concrete strength above 9.0 ksi, do not remove the strands
but consider other changes in the strand pattern.
End Strength at Bottom of Beam
If the required initial strength is greater than 7.5 ksi and greater
than that calculated at the midpoint:
1) Strands may be draped to decrease the required strength.
Keep in mind that changes to strand locations at the end of the
beam may affect the mid-beam stresses.
2) If the initial strength is lower than calculated at the midpoint,
draped strands may be placed straight thereby decreasing the
hold-down force and the number of draped strands required.
Keep in mind that changes may affect the mid-beam stresses.
End Strength at Top of Beam
If the required initial strength is greater than 7.5 ksi, raise the
center of gravity of the strands at the end of the beam. This can
be accomplished by draping strands that were previously straight
or increasing the height of the draped strands.
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-27
Midpoint Strength at Top of Beam

If the required initial strength is greater than calculated at the
bottom end or midpoint:
1) The center of gravity of the strands may be moved higher at
the center.
2) The number of strands may be reduced to decrease the
required strength.
5.4.4 Detailing/
Reinforcement
Identify the beam type on the beam sheet by depth in inches and length
rounded to the next highest foot. In the superstructure quantities list,
identify the beam type by depth. For example, a 45M beam, 72'-4" long
would be 45M-73 on the beam sheet and 45M in the quantities list.
Group beams of similar lengths with the same strand pattern into one
type on a beam sheet. The pay item quantity will be the total length of
beams (of each height) in feet.
On the framing plan, show the beam and diaphragm spacing, staging,
type of diaphragms, centerline of piers, centerline of abutment and pier
bearings, working points, beam marks (B1, B2 etc.), the X end of
beams, and the type and location of bearings. One end of each beam is
labeled the X end after fabrication. This is used during erection to
ensure that the beams are properly placed. Many times diaphragm
inserts are not symmetric and beams can only be placed one way.
5.4.5 Camber and

Deflection
The standard beam sheets contain a camber diagram where designers

are to provide camber information.
Knowing the deflection values
associated with prestressing and different dead load components, camber
values can be obtained. PCI multipliers are used to transfer the prestress
and selfweight deflections at transfer of prestress to the deflections at the
time of erection. A multiplier of 1.80 is used for the prestress deflection
component. A multiplier of 1.85 is used for the selfweight of the
member. No multiplier is used for diaphragm dead loads, deck and stool
dead loads or parapet and median dead loads.
The Initial Total Camber is the camber of the beam at the time of
erection after the diaphragms are in place.
The Est. Dead Load
Deflection is the sum of deflections associated with the placement of the
deck, railings, sidewalks, and stool. Do not include the weight of the
future wearing surface when computing the dead load deflection.
NOVEMBER 2005
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-28
5.4.6 Standard
I-Beams
I-beam sections available for use in Minnesota include the M series and
the MN series. The M series sections range in depth from 27 inches
to 81 inches and have identical top and bottom flange dimensions along
with a 6 inch thick web. The MN series sections range in depth from
45 inches to 54 inches. The MN series sections are more efficient than
the M series due to wider top and bottom flanges and a 61/2 inch thick
web.
Figures 5.4.6.1 and 5.4.6.2 contain section properties and
preliminary beam spacing vs. span length curves for all standard I-beam
shapes.
5.4.7 Rectangular
Beams
Solid rectangular prestressed beams may be used on short span bridges.

These units are most appropriate for short span structures requiring a
low profile or where construction of falsework for a slab structure would
be difficult or unwanted. Figure 5.4.6.1 and 5.4.6.2 contain section
properties and preliminary beam spacing vs. span length curves for the
standard rectangular beams.
MAY 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-29
DESIGN ASSUMPTIONS FOR PRESTRESSED CONCRETE BEAM CHART:

2004 AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, 3rd Edition.
HL-93 Live Load
Beam Concrete:
fc = 9.0 ksi
= 7.5 ksi
fci
wbm = 0.155 kips/ft
Ec = 1265 fc + 1000 ksi

Deck Concrete:
fc = 4.0 ksi
Ec = 3644 ksi
wc = 0.150 kips/ft
0.6" diameter low relaxation strands, Es = 28,500 ksi

fpu = 270 ksi with initial pull of 0.75 fpu
Simple supports with six beams and deck without wearing course.
Deck carries two F-Rails with no sidewalk or median, skew = 0 degrees.
Effective deck thickness is total deck thickness minus 1/2" of wear.
11/2" stool height used for composite beam section properties.
21/2" average stool height used for dead load calculations.
Rail dead load applied equally to all beams.
Dead load includes 0.020 ksf future wearing course.
Refined losses are used.
Service Concrete Tensile Stress Limits:
After Initial Losses:
0.2 ksi
0.094 fci
After All Losses:
0.19 fc
Beam Properties
BEAM
SHAPE
(in)
AREA
(in
(lb/ft)
(in)
(in )
SB
(in
Ac
(in
d
2
14RB
14
Rect.
364
392
7.00
5,945
849
312
18RB
18
Rect.
468
504
9.00
12,640
1,404
364
22RB
22
Rect.
572
616
11.00
23,070
2,097
416
27M
27
I-Beam
516
555
13.59
43,080
3,170
296
36M
36
I-Beam
570
614
17.96
93,530
5,208
323
45M
45
I-Beam
624
672
22.34
167,050
7,478
350
54M
54
I-Beam
678
730
26.75
265,830
9,938
377
63M
63
I-Beam
732
788
31.17
392,060
12,580
404
72M
72
I-Beam
786
846
35.60
547,920
15,390
431
81M
81
I-Beam
840
904
40.04
735,620
18,370
458
MN45
45
I-Beam
690
743
20.63
179,000
8,677
427
MN54
54
I-Beam
749
806
24.68
285,690
11,580
457
MN63
63
I-Beam
807
869
28.80
422,570
14,670
486
c Based on 155 pounds per cubic foot.

d Based on a 9" slab with 1/2" of wear and 11/2" stool.
Figure 5.4.6.1
Precast Prestressed Concrete Beam Data
S P A N L E N G T H (F E E T )
63M
72M
MN63 54@5.3
81M
Figure 5.4.6.2
44@5.3
14RB
18RB
22RB
27M
36M
20@4.2
26@5.6
28@6.6
34@5.1
38@5.1
45M
40@4.8
MN45 50@5.5
54M
44@5.1
44@5.1
44@5.1
42@4.9
44@5.1
44@5.1
20@4.2
26@5.6
28@6.6
32@4.9
34@4.2
40@5.6
50@5.5
50@4.9
54@5.3
44@5.1
40@4.6
44@5.1
44@5.1
BEAM SPACING (FEET)
20@4.4
26@5.6
28@6.6
32@5.7
34@4.9
36@4.2
46@4.7
50@4.9
54@5.3
44@5.1
10
40@5.1
44@6.0
44@5.1
44@5.1
11
20@4.4
26@5.6
28@6.6
30@5.1
34@5.6
36@4.5
46@5.4
48@4.7
54@5.3
VERIFY
SHIPPING
f 'ci = 7.5 ksi
12
48@5.0
52@7.0
13
20@4.4
26@5.6
28@6.6
30@5.5
32@4.8
36@5.3
38@4.8
42@4.1
42@5.2
44@5.1
44@5.1
NUMBERS ADJACENT TO POINTS ON THE

GRAPH REPRESENT AN APPROXIMATE DESIGN
NUMBER OF STRANDS AND CENTER OF
GRAVITY AT MIDSPAN.
DESIGN CRITERIA
HL-93 LOADING
f 'c = 9.0 ksi
0.6" STRANDS
14
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140 MN54 50@4.9
150
160
170
180
PRESTRESSED CONCRETE BEAM CHART

(Chart is for preliminary use only. See Figure 5.4.6.1 for design assumptions.)
MAY 2006
5-30
OCTOBER 2004
5.4.8
Double-Tee Beams
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-31
Pretensioned double-tees are used only on short span bridges on

state-aid projects. The primary advantage of a double-tee superstructure
is that formwork is not required. The sections are placed adjacent to
each other on the substructure units. A bituminous topping is typically
placed on top of the units to provide drainage and a smooth riding
surface. Shear transfer from one unit to an adjacent unit requires an
intermittently welded connection between the top flanges of the units.
Design Criteria
General
Dimensions and details are per Bridge Details Part II
Figures 5-397.525 and 5-397.526.
Maximum bridge width of 32 feet with 2 design lanes.
AASHTO LRFD superstructure type i.
Beams are assumed connected along the longitudinal joint to
prevent relative displacement.
Bearing width is 12 inches. Centerline of bearing is located
6 inches from the girder end.
Loading
Beams are designed for a 140 lb/ft 3 bituminous wearing surface,
3" for exterior girders and 5" for interior girders.
No provision is made for future overlay or additional superimposed
dead load.
Exterior girder is designed for full barrier load (Type-F rail,
440 lb/ft).
A midspan concrete diaphragm is included on girders 40' or
longer.
Materials
= 5 ksi
Maximum compressive strengths: fc = 7 ksi , fci
Unit weight of concrete = 0.150 kcf
Concrete elastic modulus = 33,000 (0.150)1.5
/2" diameter low relaxation strand, fpu = 270 ksi

fc
Rating
The operating rating factor is taken as:
0.7 M n M DL
( 1 + impact ) ( LL
distribution factor ) M LL
Live load distribution factors and impact are per AASHTO Standard
Specifications. Live load distribution is equivalent for interior and
exterior girders.
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-32
Prestressing
Initial camber is due to prestressing and selfweight of girder at
erection (1.5 multiplier included). DL deflection is due to barrier
and overlay loading.
Single-point draped strands are draped at the beam centerline.
Two-point draped strands are draped at 5 (1) feet each side of
beam centerline.
The hold-down force is limited to 25 kips, with a maximum of
12 strands at each hold-down point.
Standard Mn/DOT double-tees are available in 6 or 8 foot widths. Each
width is available in a 22 inch or 30 inch deep double-tee. Properties for
double-tees are presented in Figure 5.4.8.1.
Table 5.4.8.1 and Table 5.4.8.2 list the details for standard double-tee
designs for span lengths between 20 and 64 feet.
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 5.4.8.1
Prestressed Concrete Double-Tee Beams
5-33
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Table 5.4.8.1
22-6 and 22-8 Double-Tee Design Tables
5-34
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Table 5.4.8.2
30-6 and 30-8 Double-Tee Design Tables
5-35
NOVEMBER 2005
5.5
Post-Tensioned
Concrete
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-36
Post-tensioned (PT) concrete structures have their prestressing steel

stressed after the concrete has been placed and partially cured.
Post-tensioned concrete bridges are specialty structures. Poor detailing
and poor construction practices can greatly reduce the service life of
these structures.
Designers should follow current practices
recommended by the American Segmental Bridge Institute (ASBI) and
the Post-Tensioning Institute (PTI).
Design segmental box girders and post-tensioned concrete slab bridges
for zero tension under service loads.
5.5.1 PT Slab
Bridges
Post-tensioned concrete slab bridges are used for projects requiring

spans longer than those efficiently accommodated with conventionally
reinforced concrete slabs. The drawback to post-tensioned slabs is that
they are more complex to design and construct. Elastic shortening and
secondary bending moments due to post-tensioning are important design
parameters for post-tensioned slab bridges.
During construction a
number of additional components are involved. They include the
installation of post-tensioning ducts and anchorages, the pushing or
pulling of strands through the ducts, the jacking of tendons, and grouting
operations.
5.5.2
PT I-Girders
Post-tensioned I-girder bridges are rarely used in Minnesota.
5.5.3 PT Precast or
Cast-In-Place Box
Girders
The depth of box girders should preferably be a minimum of 1/18 of the

maximum span length.
Place vertical webs of box girders monolithic with the bottom slab.
5.6 Concrete
Finishes and
Coatings
The finish or coating to be used on concrete elements will usually be

determined when the Preliminary Bridge Plan is assembled. In general,
provide a finish or coating consistent with the guidance given in the
Aesthetic Guidelines for Bridge Design Manual.
A wide variety of surface finishes for concrete are used on bridge
projects. These range from plain concrete to rubbed concrete to painted
surfaces to form liners and stains. Plain concrete and rubbed concrete
finishes are described in the Mn/DOT Spec. 2401.
Painted and
architectural surfaces must be described in the special provisions.
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-37
Specify graffiti protection for concrete elements with a coating system

that has more than one color.
5.7 Design
Examples
Three design examples complete Section 5. The examples consist of a

three-span reinforced concrete slab superstructure, a prestressed I-beam
superstructure, and a three-span post-tensioned slab superstructure.
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-38
OCTOBER 2004
5.7.1 Three-Span
Haunched
Reinforced
Concrete Slab
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-39
This example illustrates the design of a haunched reinforced concrete

slab bridge. The three continuous spans are 44'-0", 55'-0", and 44'-0" in
length. The roadway width is 44'-0" with Mn/DOT Type F barrier railings
for a total out-to-out width of 47'-4". The bridge is skewed 10 degrees. A
plan view and typical sections of the bridge are shown in Figures 5.7.1.1
and 5.7.1.2.
After determining live load distribution factors, dead and live loads are
computed at span tenth points. Using Strength I, Service I, and Fatigue
design moments the flexural reinforcement is sized. This is accomplished
by:
Providing adequate steel for strength
Verifying that crack control checks are satisfied
Checking fatigue stresses in the reinforcement
Checking that the section isnt over-reinforced
Verifying that minimum reinforcement checks are satisfied
After the primary longitudinal reinforcement is designed, the shear
capacity of the section is checked. Lastly, distribution and shrinkage and
temperature reinforcement is sized.
Material and design parameters used in this example are:
Concrete Strength at 28 Days, fc = 4.0 ksi
Concrete Unit Weight, w c = 0.150 kcf (dead loads)
w c = 0.145 kcf (modulus)
Reinforcing Bars:
Yield Strength, fy = 60 ksi
Modulus of Elasticity, Es = 29,000 ksi
Weight of Future Wearing Surface = 20 psf
For simplicity, the wearing course is assumed to extend from out-to-out
of deck, and a 0.439 kip/ft barrier weight is used for the F rail.
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 5.7.1.1
5-40
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 5.7.1.2
5-41
OCTOBER 2004
A. Determine Slab
Depths
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-42
MnDOTs practice is to use linear haunches, with the haunch length equal
to 15 % of the longest span.
Haunch Length = 0.15 55 = 8.25 ft
Use 8.5 ft
The minimum slab depth at midspan ( hmin ) is also determined with the
length of the longest span (S):
0.80
(S + 10) = 0.80 (55 + 10) = 1.73

30
30
ft
Use hmin = 1.75 ft
The depth of the slab required at the pier ( hmax ) is determined with an
equation based on the length of the longest span:
1.33
(S + 10) = 1.33 (55 + 10) = 2.88

30
30
ft
Use hmax = 3.00 ft
The slab depth (h) includes the 2 inch wearing course.
B. Determine
Interior Live Load
Strip Width
[4.6.2.3]
[3.6.1.1.1]
The LRFD Specifications contain equations to determine the strip width

that carries a lane of live load. Slab designs are performed on a strip one
foot wide. The strip widths found with the LRFD equations are inverted
to arrive at the live load distribution factor for a 1 foot wide strip (LLDF).
For interior strips multiple equations are evaluated to determine whether
one or multiple live load lanes govern.
Flexure One Lane Loaded
Multiple Presence Factors have been
equations per LRFD C3.6.1.1.2.
[Eqn. 4.6.2.3-1]
Equivalent strip width (in), E = 10.0 + 5.0
incorporated into the LRFD
L 1 W1
Where:
L 1 is the modified span length.
It is equal to the span length, but can be no greater than 60.
W1 is the modified bridge width.
It is the minimum bridge width, but can be no greater than 30.
For the 44 ft side spans:
E = 10.0 + 5.0
44 30 = 191.7 in/lane
Therefore LLDFSL =
1
= 0.063 lanes/ft
191.7
12
Governs
NOVEMBER 2005
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-43
For the 55 ft center span:

E = 10.0 + 5.0
55 30 = 213.1 in/lane
Therefore LLDFSL =
1
= 0.056 lanes/ft
213.1
12
Flexure Fatigue Loading

Divide the one lane LLDF by 1.2 to remove the Multiple Presence Factor
0.063
LLDFFAT =
= 0.052 lanes/ft
Governs
1.2
0.056
= 0.047 lanes/ft
LLDFFAT =
1.2
Flexure Multiple Lanes Loaded
[Eqn. 4.6.2.3-2]
Equivalent strip width (in), E = 84.0 + 1.44
L 1 W1
12 W
NL
L 1 = 44 ft or 55 ft
W1 = 47.33 ft
W is the actual bridge width = 47.33 ft

NL =
44
= 3.7
12
Use 3
The upper limit on the equivalent strip width is:

12.0 W 12.0 47.33
=
= 189.3 in/lane
NL
3
E = 84.0 + 1.44
44 47.33 = 149.7 189.3 in/lane
Therefore the LLDFML =
1
= 0.080 lanes/ft
149.7
12
Governs
NOVEMBER 2005
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-44

E = 84.0 + 1.44
55 47.33 = 157.5 189.3 in/lane
Therefore the LLDFML =
1
= 0.076 lanes/ft
157.5
12
To simplify the process of arriving at design forces, the maximum

distribution factor (0.080 lanes/ft) will be used for all locations.
[2.5.2.6.2]
Shear and Deflection

All design lanes should be loaded and the entire slab assumed to resist
the loads.
NL = 3
m = 0.85
IM = 33%
Dynamic load allowance (IM) is applied only to the truck portion of the
live load. The distribution factor for the lane portion of the live load is
the same as that used for the shear checks:
LLDFs =
(# of lanes) (MPF ) = 3 0.85 = 0.054

(deck width)
47.33
lanes/ft
The distribution factor for the truck portion is:

LLDFs (1 + IM) = 0.054 (1 + 0.33) = 0.072 lanes/ft
[Eqn. 4.6.2.3-3]
C. Determine
Exterior Live Load
Strip Width
[4.6.2.1.4]
Reduction for Skew

r = 1.05 0.25 tan = 1.05 0.25 tan(10) = 1.006
No Reduction
The exterior strip is assumed to carry one wheel line and a tributary
portion of lane load.
Check if the equivalent strip is less than the maximum width of
72 inches.
smallest int. E
E = (Distance from edge to inside of barrier) + 12 +
149.7
= 20 + 12 +
= 106.9 > 72.0 in
Use 72.0 in
2
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-45
Compute the distribution factor associated with one truck wheel line:
LLDFEXTT =
(2
1 wheel line MPF

1 1.2
=
wheel lines/lane ) (E / 12) (2) (72 / 12)
= 0.100 lanes/ft
Compute the distribution factor associated with lane load on a 72 inch

wide exterior strip:
72 / 12 20 / 12
deck width loaded
1.2
MPF
10
10 ft load width
=
LLDFEXTL =
(exterior strip width)
(72 / 12)
= 0.087 lanes/ft
For simplicity, the larger value (0.100 lanes/ft) is used for both load
types when assembling design forces.
D. Resistance
Factors and Load
Modifiers
[5.5.4.2.1]
[1.3.3-1.3.5]
E. Select
Applicable Load
Combinations and
Load Factors
[3.4.1]
The following resistance factors will be used for this example:

= 0.90 for flexure and tension
= 0.90 for shear and torsion
The following load modifiers will be used for this example:
Strength
Service
Fatigue
Ductility
1.0
1.0
1.0
Redundancy
1.0
1.0
1.0
Importance
1.0
n/a
n/a
= D R I
1.0
1.0
1.0
Three load combinations will be considered for the design example.

STRENGTH I - Will be considered with a standard HL-93 loading.
U = 1.0 [1.25 (DC ) + 1.75 (LL + IM)]
SERVICE I - Will be used primarily for crack control checks.

U = 1.0 (DC) + 1.0 (LL + IM)
FATIGUE - Will be used to evaluate the reinforcing steel.

U = 0.75 (LL + IM)
OCTOBER 2004
F. Calculate Live
Load Force Effects
[3.6.1]
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-46
The LRFD Specifications contain several live load components that are
combined and scaled to generate design live loads. The components
include: HL-93 design truck, lane loading, tandem axles, a truck train,
and a fatigue truck with fixed axle spacings.
For this example the following combinations will be investigated:
Design Truck + Design Lane
Design Tandem + Design Lane
0.90 (Truck Train + Design Lane)
(Neg. Moment Regions)
Fatigue Truck
The dynamic load allowance (IM) has the following values:
IM = 15% when evaluating fatigue and fracture.
IM = 33% when evaluating all other limit states.
It is not applied to the lane live load.
G. Calculate Force
Effects from Other
Loads
The dead load from the barriers is conservatively assumed to be fully

carried by both interior and exterior strips. Since the slab thickness
varies, the load effect due to the slab is kept separate.
Interior Strip (1'-0" Wide)
Slab, wearing course, and barrier dead loads
2 (0.439)
WDC = (1.0 0.150 h) +
= 0.150 h + 0.019
47.33
(kip/ft)
Future wearing surface

WDW = (1.0 0.020) = 0.020
(kip/ft)
(included with DC loads in load tables)
Exterior Strip (1'-0" Wide)

Slab, wearing course, and barrier dead loads
0.439
WDC = (1.0 0.150 h) +
= 0.150 h 0.073
6
Future wearing surface
(6.0 1.67) 0.020
= 0.014
(kip/ft)
6.0
(included with DC loads in load tables)
WDW =
(kip/ft)
OCTOBER 2004
H. Summary of
Analysis Results
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-47
From this point forward, the design of an interior strip (subject to dead
and live loads) will be presented. The design procedure for the exterior
strip is similar. A computer analysis was performed with a three-span
continuous beam model. The model included the stiffening effect of the
haunches.
Bending moment summaries obtained at different span locations are
presented in Tables 5.7.1.1 through 5.7.1.4. These tables also contain
truck live load deflections and dead load deflections due to slab
selfweight, wearing course, and two barriers.
Shear information is
presented in Tables 5.7.1.5 through 5.7.1.7.
Loads and deflections that appear later in the example are identified with
bold numbers.
Table 5.7.1.1
Moment Summary One Lane
Span
Point
Lane
(kip-ft)
Truck
(kip-ft)
Tandem
(kip-ft)
Truck Tr
(kip-ft)
+ Fatigue
(kip-ft)
- Fatigue
(kip-ft)
1.0
1.1
50
194
178
140
-25
1.2
87
316
299
233
-49
1.3
112
373
368
285
-74
1.4
124
390
388
301
-98
1.5
124
374
374
285
-123
1.6
112
333
329
243
-147
1.7
-87
244/-254
-204
-253
187
-172
1.8
-104
-289
-233
-292
119
-196
1.9
-149
-325
-263
-337
63
-254
2.0
-221
-378
-292
-383
70
-382
2.1
-129
-267
-229
-284
44
-223
2.2
-75
157/-226
-193
-226
131
-145
2.3
78
284/-187
288
223
-118
2.4
107
360
350
275
-91
2.5
117
378
368
274
-64
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-48
Table 5.7.1.2
Moment Summary Interior Strip (per foot width)
* Tandem
+ Lane
(kip-ft)
* .9 (Truck Tr
+ Lane)
(kip-ft)
Span
Point
(kip-ft)
* Truck
+ Lane
(kip-ft)
1.0
1.1
17.2
25
23
1.2
28.9
41
39
MDC
1.3
34.3
49
48
1.4
34.3
51
51
1.5
28.9
50
50
1.6
17.1
44
44
1.7
-1.1
33/-34
34/-29
-31
1.8
-23.6
-39
-33
-35
1.9
-53.6
-47
-40
-43
2.0
-90.9
-58
-49
-53
2.1
-48.2
-39
-35
-37
2.2
-16.0
21/-30
24/-27
-27
2.3
7.5
37/-25
37/-22
2.4
20.4
47
46
2.5
25.7
50
49
* Includes Dynamic Load Allowance (IM) and 0.080 Distribution Factor.
Table 5.7.1.3
Moment Summary Exterior Strip (per foot width)
(kip-ft)
* Truck
+ Lane
(kip-ft)
* Tandem
+ Lane
(kip-ft)
* 0.9 (Truck Tr
+ Lane)
(kip-ft)
1.0
1.1
20.0
31
29
1.2
33.3
51
49
1.3
40.6
61
60
1.4
40.6
64
64
1.5
33.3
62
62
1.6
19.8
56
55
1.7
-1.0
42/-42
43/-36
-38
1.8
-28.1
-49
-41
-44
1.9
-62.5
-58
-50
-54
2.0
-105.1
-72
-61
-66
2.1
-55.2
-48
-43
-46
2.2
-18.7
27/-38
30/-33
-34
2.3
8.3
46
46
2.4
24.0
59
57
2.5
29.2
62
61
Span
Point
MDC
*Includes Dynamic Load Allowance (IM) and 0.100 Distribution Factor.
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-49
Table 5.7.1.4
Moment Load Combinations and Deflections
Service I
Span
Point
Strength I
*
Lane
LL
Deflection
(in)
*
Truck
LL
Deflection
(in)
**
Dead
Ld
Deflection
(in)
Interior
(kip-ft)/ft
Exterior
(kip-ft)/ft
Interior
(kip-ft)/ft
Exterior
(kip-ft)/ft
1.0
0.000
0.000
0.000
1.1
42
51
65
79
0.047
0.172
0.089
1.2
70
84
107
130
0.087
0.310
0.162
1.3
83
101
128
157
0.118
0.414
0.209
1.4
86
105
133
163
0.137
0.466
0.224
1.5
79
95
123
150
0.141
.0475
0.208
1.6
62
75
99
122
0.131
0.430
0.166
1.7
32/-35
42/-43
58/-61
74/-76
0.108
0.344
0.110
1.8
-63
-77
-98
-121
0.076
0.242
0.056
1.9
-100
-121
-148
-180
0.038
0.120
0.019
2.0
-149
-178
-215
-258
0.000
0.000
0.000
2.1
-87
-104
-128
-154
0.046
0.156
0.002
2.2
8/-46
11/-56
17/-73
29/-89
0.072
0.328
0.031
2.3
44/-18
54
74/-34
91
0.138
0.500
0.085
2.4
67
83
108
133
0.167
0.586
0.130
2.5
75
91
119
145
0.178
0.653
0.147
* Based on Ieffective = 1/2 Igross . Includes LL distribution factor.

**Includes selfweight, wearing course, and barriers.
Table 5.7.1.5
Shear Summary One Lane
Span
Point
Lane
(kips)
Truck
(kips)
Tandem
(kips)
1.0
12.7
52.8
47.0
1.1
10.3
44.1
40.4
1.2
7.8
35.8
34.0
1.3
5.9
28.2
27.8
1.4
5.8
21.1
22.8
1.5
7.3
27.6
28.5
1.6
9.2
34.9
33.9
1.7
11.4
42.3
38.6
1.8
13.9
49.3
42.6
1.9
16.4
55.6
46.0
2.0
19.9
61.2
48.8
2.1
16.6
54.4
45.0
2.2
13.4
46.9
40.4
2.3
10.6
38.8
35.0
2.4
8.2
30.5
29.0
2.5
6.2
22.4
22.7
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-50
Table 5.7.1.6
Shear Summary (per foot width)
VDC
(kips)
* Truck + Lane
(kips)
* Tandem + Lane
(kips)
4.6
4.5
4.1
1.1
3.3
3.7
3.5
1.2
2.0
3.0
2.9
1.3
0.7
2.3
2.3
1.4
0.7
1.8
2.0
1.5
2.0
2.4
2.4
1.6
3.3
3.0
2.9
1.7
4.7
3.7
3.4
1.8
6.0
4.3
3.8
1.9
7.5
4.9
4.2
2.0
9.5
5.5
4.6
2.1
6.7
4.8
4.1
2.2
5.0
4.1
3.6
2.3
3.3
3.4
3.1
2.4
1.7
2.6
2.5
2.5
0.0
1.9
2.0
Span
Point
1.0
* Includes Dynamic Load Allowance (IM) and 0.054 Distribution Factor.
Table 5.7.1.7
Shear Summary Load Combinations
Span
Point
SERVICE I
(kips)
STRENGTH I
(kips)
1.0
9.1
13.6
1.1
7.0
10.6
1.2
5.0
7.7
1.3
3.0
5.0
1.4
2.7
4.3
1.5
4.4
6.8
1.6
6.3
9.4
1.7
8.4
12.3
1.8
10.3
15.0
1.9
12.4
17.9
2.0
15.0
21.4
2.1
11.5
16.8
2.2
9.1
13.4
2.3
6.7
10.0
2.4
4.3
6.7
2.5
2.0
3.4
OCTOBER 2004
I. Live Load
Deflection
[2.5.2.6]
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
To prevent serviceability problems, a limit is placed on the maximum live

load deflections. The limit is:
Span
LL + I =
800
Spans 1 and 3 =
Span 2 =
[3.6.1.3.2]
5-51
44 12
= 0.66 in
800
55 12
= 0.83 in
800
Use the design truck alone or design lane load plus 25% of truck load.
Using the Table 5.7.1.1 live load deflection values, the following
maximum live load deflections were obtained:
Midspans 1 and 3
Truck:
0.475 in < 0.66 in
Lane + 25% Truck: 0.141 + 0.25 (0.475) = 0.260 in < 0.66 in
Midspan 2
Truck:
0.653 in < 0.83 in
Lane + 25% Truck: 0.178 + 0.25 (0.653) = 0.341 in < 0.66 in
J. Shear in Slab
[5.13.3.6]
Vr = Vn = 0.9 Vn
Check the one-way shear capacity of the slab.
[5.8.2.9]
Critical Section
Shear should be checked at all sections. In many cases the governing
location is at the abutment, a pier, or at the start of the haunch.
Calculations for the shear check at the start of the linear haunch for the
side span (Span Point 1.81) follow.
The effective shear depth dv is the distance between the internal tension
and compression force components to resist flexure, which is unkown at
this point in the design.
But the shear depth need not be less than
0.9 de = 0.9 (17.0) = 15.30 in
or
0.72 h = 0.72 (19.0) = 13.68 in
Use dv = 15.30 in
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-52
The shear loads at adjacent span points are interpolated to determine the
shear at Span Point 1.81:
1.81 1.8
VU = 15.0 kips +
(17.9 kips 15.0 kips) = 15.3 kips
1.9 1.8
[5.8.3.3]
Nominal Shear Resistance

The nominal shear resistance is the sum of the contributions from the
concrete and steel.
Vn = Vc + Vs
It can be no more than:

Vn 0.25 fc b v dv = 0.25 4.0 12 15.30 = 183.6 kips
To simplify the calculation for the concrete contribution, assume = 2.0 .

If shear reinforcement is found necessary, the designer should first try
thickening the slab to eliminate the need for shear reinforcement. If
shear reinforcement must be used, the appropriate and values
should be used for the shear design.
Vc = 0.0316 fc b v dv = 0.0316 2.0 4.0 12 15.30 = 23.2 kips
Without shear reinforcement:
Vs =
A v fy dv (cot + cot ) sin

s
=0
The nominal shear capacity of the slab is:

Vn = 23.2 + 0 = 23.2 kips < 183.6 kips
OK
Check if the shear resistance is greater than the shear demand:

Vr = Vn = 0.90 (23.2) = 20.9 kips > 15.3 kips
OK
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-53
K. Design Positive
Moment
Reinforcement
Determine the required area of flexural reinforcement to satisfy the

Strength I Load Combination.
[5.7.2.2]
[5.7.3.2]
Flexural Resistance
Assume a rectangular stress distribution and solve for the required area
of reinforcing based on Mu and d.
For fc = 4.0 ksi , 1 = 0.85

a
Mu = Mn = A s fy d
2
A s fy
a=
0.85 fc b
A s fy
Mu = A s fy d
1.7 fc b
A s 60 1
Mu = 0.90 A s (60) d
1
.
7 4 12 12
3.309 A s2 4.5 d A s + Mu = 0
As =
4.5 d
20.25 d2 13.236 Mu
6.618
The d value used in positive moment regions does not include the
2 inch wearing course.
d int = 21 2 1.5 0.5 (1.0) = 17.00 in
d ext = 21 2 1.5 0.5 (1.128) = 16.94 in
Trial reinforcement information for Span Points 1.4 and 2.5 are provided
in the following table. After evaluating the areas of steel required, a
layout based on a 5 inch base dimension was selected.
Trial Bottom Longitudinal Reinforcement
Interior Strip
Exterior Strip
Span
Point
As
Trial
As
(req)
Bars
(prov)
17.00
1.89
#25 @ 5
17.00
1.68
#25 @ 5
Mu
1.4
133
2.5
119
As
Trial
As
(req)
Bars
(prov)
16.94
2.38
#29 @ 5
2.40
16.94
2.09
#29 @ 5
2.40
Mu
1.90
163
1.90
145
OCTOBER 2004
[5.7.3.4]
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-54
Crack Control
To ensure that cracking is limited to small cracks that are well
distributed, a limit is placed on the service load stress in the reinforcing
steel. LRFD Equation 5.7.3.4-1 defines the maximum stress permitted:
z
fs fsa =
0.6 fy
3
dc A
At Span Point 1.4 the Service I positive moment is 86 kip-ft.

The stress in the reinforcement is found using a cracked section analysis
with the trial reinforcement. To simplify the calculations, the section is
assumed to be singly reinforced.
[5.4.2.4 & 5.7.1]
n=
Es
29,000
=
= 7.96
Ec
33,000 (0.145)1.5 4.0
Use n = 8
n A s = 8 (1.90) = 15.2 in2
Determine the location of the neutral axis:
bx
x
= n A s (d x )
2
(12) x2
2
= 15.2 (17.0 x )
solving, x = 5.42 in
Determine the lever arm between service load flexural force components.
5.42
x
j d = d = 17.0
= 15.2 in
3
3
Compute the stress in the reinforcement.
M
86 12
= 35.7 ksi
fs =
=
A s j d 1.90 (15.2)
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-55
For z = 130 kips/in, dc = 2.00 in (1.5 in + 1/2 of #25 bar) and #25 bars
spaced at 5 inches.
A=
2 dc b 2 2 5
=
= 2.0 in2
N
1
fsa =
z
3
dc A
130
3
2 20.0
= 38.0 ksi > 0.6 fy = 36 ksi > 35.7 ksi
OK
[5.5.3]
Fatigue
The stress range in the reinforcement is computed and compared against
code limits to ensure adequate fatigue resistance is provided.
[Table 3.4.1-1]
U = 0.75 (LL + IM)

IM = 15%
[3.6.2.1]
At Span Point 1.4 the one lane fatigue moments are:

Maximum positive moment = 301 kip-ft
Maximum negative moment = -98 kip-ft
Multiplying the one lane moments by the appropriate load factor,
dynamic load allowance, and distribution factor results in the following
fatigue moments:
Fatigue LL Mmax = 301 (0.75) 1.15 0.052 = 13.5 kip-ft
Fatigue LL Mmin = 98 (0.75) 1.15 0.052 = 4.4 kip-ft
The unfactored dead load moment at Span Point 1.4 is 34.3 kip-ft.
The moments on the cross section when fatigue loading is applied are:
Maximum moment = 34.3 + 13.5 = 47.8 kip-ft
Minimum moment = 34.3 4.4 = 29.9 kip-ft
Plugging these moments into the equation used to compute the stress in
the reinforcement for crack control results in:
For the maximum moment:
M
47.8 12
= 19.9 ksi
fs =
=
A s j d 1.90 (15.2)
For the minimum moment:
M
29.9 12
= 12.4 ksi
fs =
=
A s j d 1.90 (15.2)
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-56
The stress range in the reinforcement ( ff ) is the difference between the

two stresses
ff = (19.9 12.4) = 7.5 ksi
[5.5.3.2]
The maximum stress range permitted is based on the minimum stress in

the bar and the deformation pattern of the reinforcement.
r
ff (max) = 21 0.33 fmin + 8 = 21 033 (12.4) + 8 (0.3) = 19.3 ksi
h
OK
= 19.3 > 7.5 ksi
[5.7.3.3.1]
Check Maximum Reinforcement

To ensure the cross section isnt over-reinforced, the depth of the section
in compression is compared to the distance to the tension reinforcement.
If the ratio of these dimensions is less than 0.42 the check is satisfied.
The depth of the Whitney stress block is:

a=
A s fy
0.85 fc b
1.90 60
= 2.79 in
0.85 4.0 12
The depth of the section in compression is:

c=
a
2.79
=
= 3.28 in
1
0.85
c 3.28
=
= 0.19 < 0.42
d 17.0
[5.7.3.3.2]
OK
Check Minimum Reinforcement

To prevent a brittle failure, adequate flexural reinforcement needs to be
placed in the cross section. For this check, the thickness of the slab
including the wearing course is used to be conservative.
fr = 0.24
fc = 0.24
4 = 0.48 ksi
t = 21.0 in
Ig =
1
1
b t3 =
12 (21)3 = 9261 in 4
12
12
y t = 10.5 in
Mcr =
fr Ig 0.48 9261
= 35.3 kip-ft
=
10.5 (12)
t
1.2 Mcr = 42.4 kip-ft
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-57
Mr = A s fy d
2
2.79 1
Mr = 0.9 (1.90) (60) 17.0
2 12
Mr = 133.4 kip-ft > 1.2 Mcr = 42.4 kip-ft
OK
Use #25 bars at 5 inches at Span Point 1.4

[5.11.1.2.1]
[5.11.1.2.2]
Bar Cutoff Location

Determine the location where the 5 inch spacing can be increased to
10 inches. Assume that the bars will be dropped in non-haunched
regions of the span. The moment capacity of #25 bars at 10 inches
( A s = 0.95 in2 ) for positive flexure is:
a
Mr = A s fy d
2
1
0.95 (60)

Mr = 0.9 (0.95) (60) 17.0
= 69.7 kip-ft
(
)
(
)
(
)
2
0
.
85
4
12
12
For the interior strip, the positive bending moments are:

Span Point
MStrength I (kip-ft)/ft
MService I (kip-ft)/ft
1.6
99
62
1.7
58
32
2.2
17
2.3
74
44
Knowing that span points are 4.4 feet apart in Span 1 and 5.5 feet apart
in Span 2, the drop point locations which meet the positive Strength I
bending moment of 69.7 kip-ft can be found.
For Span 1, interpolate between Span Points 1.6 and 1.7:
99 69.7
1.6 +
0.1 = 1.67 or 14.5 ft from Pier 1 centerline.
99 58
69.7 17
2.2 +
74 17
The reinforcement must also meet the serviceability requirements at the
theoretical drop point. Determine the drip point location based on the
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-58
crack control requirements and compare with the drop points based on
strength to see which ones govern.
[5.7.3.4]
For #25 bars @ 10", ( A s = 0.95 in2 ), z = 130 kips/in, and dc = 2.00 in ,
compute the allowable stress:
A=
2 dc b 2 2.00 10
=
= 40.0 in2
N
1
fsa =
z
3
dc A
130
3
2.00 40.0
= 30.2 ksi
Next, determine neutral axis:

n A s = 8 0.95 = 7.60 in2
x
b x = n A s (d x )
2
12 x 2
= 7.60 (17.00 x )
2
Then j d = d
solving, x=4.05 in
4.05
x
= 17.00
= 15.65 in
3
3
Actual stress at drop point fs =
Mdrop
As j d
Set actual stress fs equal to the allowable stress fsa and solve for the
moment Mdrop at the drop point:
Mdrop
As j d
= fsa
Mdrop = fsa A s j d = 30.2 0.95 15.65
1
= 37.4 kip-ft
12
Interpolate to determine span point location of drop point:

For Span 1:
62 37.4
1.6 +
62 32
For Span 2:
37.4 8
2.2 +
44 8
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-59
Therefore, the drop point locations based on crack control govern the bar
cutoff locations.
By inspection, the fatigue stress range check and the minimum
reinforcement check are satisfied.
Due to the uncertainty associated with the design moments, the
reinforcement cannot be terminated at the theoretical drop point. It
must be carried beyond the theoretical point by the greater of: the depth
of the member, 15 times the nominal diameter of the bar, or 1/20 of the
clear span.
The required extension L ext1 for Span 1 is:
L ext1 = d = 17.0 in
or
L ext1 = 15 db = 15 1.00 = 15.0 in
or
L ext1 =
1
(44 12) = 26.4 in
20
GOVERNS

1
L ext2 =
(55 12) = 33.0 in
20
Adding the extension length to the theoretical distance from the pier at
which the bars can be dropped results in the following cutoff locations:
For Span 1: 14.1
26.4
= 11.9 ft
12
Use 11'-6"
For Span 2: 15.4
33.0
= 12.7 ft
12
Use 12'-6"
By continuing half of the reinforcement for the entire length of the

bridge, LRFD Article 5.11.1.2.2 is satisfied.
[5.8.3.5]
Check Longitudinal Reinforcement

Check the minimum longitudinal reinforcement requirements at the
abutments, assuming that a diagonal crack would start at the inside edge
of the bearing area.
The slab sits on a 2'-10" wide integral abutment.
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-60
For = 45 determine the length from the end of the slab, L crack , at
which a diagonal crack will intersect the bottom longitudinal
reinforcement (#25 bars @ 5"):
2.00
L crack = 2.83 +
cot(45) = 3.00 ft = 36.00 in
12
From Figure 5.2.2.2 of this manual, the development length for #25 bars
@ 5" with 1.5" cover is:
l d25 = 3'-9" = 45"
Then the tensile resistance of the longitudinal bars at the crack location
Tr = fy A s =
L c (end cover )
l d 25
36.0 (~ 3.5)
= 60 1.90
= 82.3 kips
45.0
The force to be resisted is:

V
T = u 0.5Vs Vp cot

13.6
=
0.5 0 0 cot 45
0.9
= 15.1 kips < 82.3 kips
OK
Note that LRFD C5.8.3.5 states that Vu may be taken at 0.5 dv cot or
dv away from the face of support. For simplicity, the value for Vu at the
abutment centerline of bearing was used in the equation above.
L. Design Negative
Moment
Reinforcement

Strength I Load Combination.
[5.7.2.2]
[5.7.3.2]
Flexural Resistance
of reinforcing based on Mu and d.
Use the same general equation developed for the positive moment
reinforcement.
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
As =
4.5 d
5-61
20.25 d2 13.23 Mu
6.618
dint = 36 3 0.5 (1.0) = 32.50 in

dext = 36 3 0.5 (1.128) = 32.44 in
The required area of steel and trial reinforcement is presented in the

following table.
Trial Top Longitudinal Reinforcement
Interior Strip
Span Point
Mu
2.0
[5.7.3.4]
-215 32.50
Exterior Strip
As
Trial
As
(req)
Bars
(prov)
1.52
#25 @ 5
1.90
Mu
-258 32.44
As
Trial
As
(req)
Bars
(prov)
1.84
#29 @ 5
2.40
Crack Control
At Span Point 2.0 the Service I moment is 149 kip-ft
Similar to the positive moment sections, the stress in the reinforcement

is found using a cracked section analysis with the trial reinforcement. For
this check, the section is assumed to be singly reinforced.
n A s = 8 (1.90) = 15.2 in2

x
b x = n A s (d x )
2
(12) x2
2
= 15.2 (32.5 x )
solving, x=7.90 in
7.90
x
j d = d = 32.5
= 29.9 in
3
3
M
149 12
= 31.5 ksi
fs =
=
A s j d 1.90 (29.9)
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-62
For z = 130 kips/in, dc = 2.50 in (2.0 in maximum + 1/2 of #25 bar) and
#25 bars spaced at 5 inches, compute the allowable stress:
As =
fsa =
2 dc b 2 2.5 5
=
= 25.0 in2
N
1
z
3
dc A
130
3
2.5 25.0
fsa = 32.8 > 31.5 ksi
= 32.8 ksi < 0.6 fy = 36 ksi
OK
[5.5.3]
Fatigue
code limits to ensure adequate fatigue resistance is provided.
[Table 3.4.1-1]
U = 0.75 (LL + IM)

IM = 15%
[3.6.2.1]
At Span Point 2.0 the one lane fatigue moments are:

Maximum positive moment = 70 kip-ft
Maximum negative moment = -382 kip-ft
Multiplying the one lane moments by the appropriate load factor,
dynamic load allowance, and distribution factor results in the following
fatigue moments:
Fatigue LL Mmax = 70 (0.75) 1.15 0.052 = 3.1 kip-ft
Fatigue LL Mmin = 382 (0.75) 1.15 0.052 = 17.1 kip-ft
The unfactored dead load moment at Span Point 2.0 is 90.9 kip-ft.
The moments on the cross section when fatigue loading is applied are:
Maximum moment = -90.9 + 3.1 = -87.8 kip-ft
Minimum moment = -90.9 17.1 = -108.0 kip-ft
M
87.8 12
= 18.6 ksi
fs =
=
A s j d 1.90 (29.9)
M
108.0 12
= 22.8 ksi
fs =
=
A s j d 1.90 (29.9)
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-63
The stress range in the reinforcement (ff ) is the difference between the
two stresses.
ff = (22.8 18.6 ) = 4.2 ksi
[5.5.3.2]

r
ff(max) = 21 0.33 fmin + 8 = 21 0.33 (18.6 ) + 8 (0.3)
h
= 17.3 ksi > 4.2 ksi
OK
[5.7.3.3.1]

a=
A s fy
1.90 60
=
= 2.79 in
0.85 fc b 0.85 4.0 12

c=
a
2.79
=
= 3.28 in
1
0.85
c 3.28
=
= 0.10 < 0.42
d 32.5
[5.7.3.3.2]
OK

To prevent a brittle failure, adequate flexural reinforcement needs to be
placed in the cross section.
fr = 0.48 ksi
Ig =
1
1
b t3 =
12 (36 )3 = 46,656 in 4
12
12
y t = 18.0 in
Mcr =
fr Ig
yt
0.48 46,656
= 103.7 kip-ft
18.0 (12)
1.2 Mcr = 124.4 kip-ft
Mr = A s fy d
2
2.79 1
Mr = 0.9 (1.90) (60) 32.5
2 12
= 265.9 kip-ft > 1.2 Mcr = 124.4 kip-ft
OK
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-64
Use #25 bars at 5 inches at Span Point 2.0

[5.11.1.2.1]
[5.11.1.2.3]
Bar Cutoff Location

Determine the location where the 5 inch spacing can be increased to
10 inches. Assume that the bars will be dropped in non-haunched
regions of the span. The moment capacity of #25 bars at 10 inches
A s = 0.95 in2 for negative flexure is:
Mr = A s fy d
2
1
0.95 (60)
= 0.9 (0.95) (60) 32.50
= 136.0 kip-ft
2 (0.85) (4) (12) 12
For the interior strip, the negative bending moments are:

Span Point
MStrength I (kip-ft)/ft
MService I (kip-ft)/ft
1.8
-98
-63
1.9
-148
-100
2.0
-215
-149
2.1
-128
-87
2.2
-73
-46
Knowing that span points are 4.4 feet apart in Span 1 and 5.5 feet apart
in Span 2, the drop point locations which meet the Strength I negative
bending moment of 136.0 kip-ft can be found.
136.0 98
1.8 +
148 98

215 136.0
2.0 +
215 128
The reinforcement must also meet the serviceability requirements at the

theoretical drop point. Determine the drip point location based on the
crack control requirements and compare with the drop points based on
strength to see which ones govern.
OCTOBER 2004
[5.7.3.4]
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-65
For #25 bars @ 10", ( A s = 0.95 in2 ), z = 130 kips/in, and dc = 2.50 in ,
compute the allowable stress:
A=
2 dc b 2 2.50 10
=
= 50.0 in2
N
1
fsa =
z
3
dc A
130
3
2.50 50.0
= 26.0 ksi
Next, determine neutral axis:

n A s = 8 0.95 = 7.60 in2
x
b x = n A s (d x )
2
12 x 2
= 7.60 (32.50 x )
2
Then j d = d
solving, x=5.81 in
x
5.81
= 32.50
= 30.56 in
3
3
Actual stress at drop point fs =
Mdrop
As j d
Set actual stress fs equal to the allowable stress fsa and solve for the
moment Mdrop at the drop point:
Mdrop
As j d
= fsa
Mdrop = fsa A s j d = 26.0 0.95 30.56
1
= 62.9 kip-ft
12
Interpolate to determine span point location of drop point:

For Span 1:
Mdrop = 62.9 kip-ft 63 kip-ft, which is at Span Point 1.8 or 8.8 ft
from Pier 1 centerline.
For Span 2:
87 62.9
2.1 +
87 46
Therefore, the drop point locations based on crack control govern the bar
cutoff locations.
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-66
By inspection, the fatigue stress range check and the minimum

reinforcement check are satisfied.
Due to the uncertainty associated with the design moments, the
reinforcement cannot be terminated at the theoretical drop point. It
must be carried beyond the theoretical point by the greater of: the depth
of the member, 15 times the nominal diameter of the bar, or 1/20 of the
clear span.
L ext1 = d = 21 3 0.5 (1.0) = 17.5 in
or
L ext1 = 15 db = 15 1.00 = 15.0 in
or
L ext1 =
1
(44 12) = 26.4 in
20
GOVERNS

1
(55 12) = 33.0 in
L ext2 =
20
Adding the extension length to the theoretical distance from the pier at
which the bars can be dropped results in the following cutoff locations:
For Span 1: 8.8 +
26.4
= 11.0 ft
12
Use 11'-0"
For Span 2: 8.8 +
33.0
= 11.55 ft
12
Use 12'-0"
By continuing half of the reinforcement for the entire length of the

bridge, LRFD Article 5.11.1.2.3 is satisfied.
M. Distribution
Reinforcement
[5.14.4.1]
The amount of transverse reinforcement may be taken as a percentage of

the main reinforcement required:
100
50%
L
100
44
= 15.1%
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-67
For the interior strip, the maximum reinforcement is #25 bars at 5 inches
(1.90 in 2 /ft). The required transverse reinforcement for load distribution
is:
0.151 (1.90) = 0.29 in2 /ft
Use #16 @ 12", A s = 0.31 in2 /ft for bottom transverse reinforcement.
N. Shrinkage and
Temperature
Reinforcement
[5.10.8]
Adequate reinforcement needs to be provided in the slab to ensure that

cracks from shrinkage and temperature changes are small and well
distributed.
Ag
(12) (21)
2
= 0.11
Temperature A s 0.11
= 0.46 in /ft
fy
60
(total in each direction, distributed to both faces)

For each face, Min A s =
1
(0.46 ) = 0.23 in2 /ft
2
Use #16 @ 12", A s = 0.31 in2 /ft for transverse reinforcement.
O. Dead Load
Camber
[5.7.3.6.2]
The total weight of the superstructure is used for dead load deflections.
The gross moment of inertia is used and a computer analysis is used to
obtain instantaneous deflections. A longtime deflection multiplier of 4.0
is used in conjunction with the gross moment of inertia. The slab is
cambered upward an amount equal to the immediate deflection + 1/2 of
the long-term deflection. A camber diagram for the interior strip is
shown below:
Instantaneous +
/2 Long-term Camber
P. Final
Reinforcement
Layout
Figure 5.7.1.3 contains a plan view and Figure 5.7.1.4 contains a cross
section that illustrates the reinforcement for the slab. As one would
expect, the figures show that the exterior strips contain more reinforcing
steel than the interior of the slab.
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 5.7.1.3
5-68
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 5.7.1.4
5-69
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-70
OCTOBER 2004
5.7.2 Prestressed
I-Beam Design
Example
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-71
This example illustrates the design of a pretensioned I-Beam for a two

span bridge without skew.
The 130'-0" spans are supported with
Mn/DOT 72" beams.
Mn/DOT standard details and drawings for
diaphragms (B406, B812), railings (Fig. 5-397.117), and beams (Fig. 5397.517) are to be used with this example. This example contains the
design of a typical interior beam at the critical sections in positive flexure,
shear, and deflection. The superstructure consists of six beams spaced
at 9'-0" centers. A typical transverse superstructure section is provided
in Figure 5.7.2.1. A framing plan is provided in Figure 5.7.2.2. The
roadway section is composed of two 12' traffic lanes and two 12'
shoulders. A Type F railing is provided on each side of the bridge and a
9" composite concrete deck is used. End diaphragms (B812) are used at
each end of the bridge and interior diaphragms (B406) are used at the
interior third points and at the pier.
Figure 5.7.2.1
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 5.7.2.2
5-72
OCTOBER 2004
A. Materials
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-73
The modulus of elasticity for high strength concrete suggested by ACI

Committee 363 is used for the beam concrete. The composite deck is
assumed to have a unit weight of 0.150 kcf for dead load computations
and 0.145 kcf for elastic modulus computations. The beam concrete is
assumed to have a unit weight of 0.155 kcf for dead load computations.
The material and geometric parameters used in the example are shown
in Table 5.7.2.1:
Table 5.7.2.1
Material Properties
Concrete
Material Parameter
Prestressed Beam
Deck
at transfer
fci
7 ksi
---
fc at 28 days
8.0 ksi
4 ksi
Eci at transfer
+ 1000
fci
---
= 4347 ksi
(1265 fc ) + 1000
33,000 (0.145)1.5 fc
= 4578 ksi
= 3644 ksi
fy for rebar
60 ksi
60 ksi
fpu for strand
270 ksi
---
Es for rebar
29,000 ksi
29,000 ksi
Ep for strand
28,500 ksi
---
Strand type
0.6 inch diameter

270 ksi, low relaxation
---
Ec at 28 days
Steel
(1265
B. Determine
Cross-Section
Properties for a
Typical Interior
Beam
The beams are designed to act compositely with the deck on simple
spans. The deck consists of a 7 inch thick concrete slab with a 2 inch
wearing course. For simplicity and in order to be conservative, the
beams are designed assuming the full 9 inches of thickness is placed in a
single pour. A 1/2 inch of wear is assumed. A thickness of 81/2 inches is
used for composite section properties. The haunch or stool is assumed to
have an average thickness of 21/2 inches for dead load computations and
11/2 inches for section property computations.
[4.6.2.6.1]
The effective flange width, b e , is the smallest of:

1
1) 1/4 x Effective Span Length = 130 12 = 390.0 in
4
2) 12 x Slab Thickness + 1/2 Top Flange Width
30
= 12 8.5 +
= 117.0 in
2
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-74
3) Average Beam Spacing = 108.0 in
GOVERNS
The modular ratio of the deck concrete to the beam concrete is:
n=
E cdeck
3644
=
= 0.796
E cbeam
4578
This results in a transformed effective flange width of:

b etrans = 0.796 (108.0) = 86.0 in
Properties for an interior beam are given in Table 5.7.2.2.

Table 5.7.2.2
Cross-Section Properties
C. Shear Forces
and Bending
Moments
Parameter
Non-composite Section
Composite Section
Height of section, h
72 in
82.0 in
Deck thickness
---
8.5 in
Average stool thickness
---
Effective flange width, be
---
Area, A
786 in 2
1553 in 2
Moment of inertia, I
547,920 in 4
1,235,000 in 4
Centroidal axis height, y
35.60 in
56.29 in
Bottom section modulus, Sb
15,390 in 3
21,940 in 3
Top section modulus, St
15,050 in 3
48,040 in 3 (beam concrete)

60,350 in 3 (deck concrete)
Top of prestressed beam
15,050 in 3
78,610 in 3
1.5 in (section properties)

2.5 in (dead load)
108.0 in (deck concrete)
86.0 in (beam concrete)
Three load combinations will be considered; Strength I, Service I, and

Service III. As a result of the simple span configuration, only maximum
p values need to be considered.
Load effects related to settlement, thermal effects, water load, or stream
pressure will not be considered.
Assume that traffic can be positioned anywhere between the barriers.
Number of design lanes =
distance between barriers 48

=
=4
design lane width
12
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-75
[3.6.2]
Dynamic load allowance IM = 33%
[4.6.2.2]
1. Determine Live Load Distribution Factors

Designers should note that the approximate distribution factor equations
include the multiple presence factors.
[4.6.2.2.2]
Distribution Factor for Moment Interior Beams

LRFD Table 4.6.2.2.1-1 lists the common deck superstructure types for
which approximate live load distribution equations have been assembled.
The cross section for this design example is Type (k). To ensure that the
approximate distribution equations can be used, several parameters need
to be checked.
1)
2)
3)
4)
3.5 ft beam spacing = 9.0 ft 16.0 ft

3.5 in slab thickness = 8.5 in 12.0 in
20 ft span length = 130 ft 240 ft
4 number of beams = 6
OK
OK
OK
OK
The distribution factor equations use a Kg factor that is defined in LRFD

Article 4.6.2.2.1.
=
Ec beam
Ec deck
4578
= 1.256
3644
e g = ( deck centroid ) ( beam centroid ) = 77.75 35.60 = 42.15 in
( )
K g = I + A e g 2 = 1.256 547,920 + 786 (42.15)2 = 2.442 x 10 6
One design lane loaded:

S
gM = 0.06 +
14
0.4
9.0
gM = 0.06 +
14
S

L
0.4
0.3
90
130
gM = 0.473 lanes/beam
3
12 L t
s
0.3
0.1
2.442 x 106
12 130 8.53
0.1
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-76
Two or more design lanes loaded:

S
gM = 0.075 +
9.5
9.0
gM = 0.075 +
9.5
0.6
0.6
S

L
0.2
90
130
Kg
12 L t 3
s
0.2
0.1
2.442 x 106
12 130 8.53
0.1
[4.6.2.2.2d]
Distribution Factor for Moment - Exterior Beams

LRFD Table 4.6.2.2.2d-1 contains the approximate distribution factor
equations for exterior beams. Type (k) cross-sections have a deck
dimension check to ensure that the approximate equations are valid.
The distance from the inside face of barrier to the centerline of the fascia
beam is defined as de . For the example this distance is:
de = 24 (2.5 9.0) = 1.50 ft
The check to use the approximate equations is:

1.0 ft de = 1.50 ft 5.5 ft
OK
Figure 5.7.2.3
NOVEMBER 2005
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-77
Use the lever rule to determine the live load distribution factor for one
lane.
The exterior beam live load distribution factor is found by determining the
exterior beam reaction:
W1 = W2 = 0.5 lanes
W L + W2 L 2
0.5 8.5 + 0.5 2.5
= 1.2
gM = 1.2 1 1
S
9.0

The distribution factor is equal to the factor e multiplied by the interior
girder distribution factor for two or more lanes
de = 24.0 22.5 = 1.5 ft
d
1.5
e = 0.77 + e = 0.77 +
= 0.935
9.1
9.1
gM = e gint = 0.935 0.698 = 0.653 lanes/beam
[4.6.2.2.2e]
Skew Factor
No correction is necessary for a skew angle of zero.
[4.6.2.2.3]
[4.6.2.2.3a]
Distribution Factor for Shear Interior Beams

LRFD Table 4.6.2.2.3a-1 can be used.

9.0
S
gV = 0.36 +
= 0.720 lanes/beam
= 0.36 +
25.0
25.0
S S
gV = 0.2 +
12 35
[4.6.2.2.3b]
9.0 9.0
= 0.2 +
12 35
= 0.884 lanes/beam
Distribution Factor for Shear Exterior Beams

One Design Lane Loaded:
Use the lever rule, which results in the same factor that was computed
for flexure and is equal to 0.733 lanes/beam

d
1.5
e = 0.6 + e = 0.6 +
= 0.750
10
10
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-78
The exterior beam shear distribution factor for two or more design lanes
is determined by modifying the interior distribution factor:
gV = e gint = 0.750 0.884 = 0.663 lanes/beam
[4.6.2.2.3c]
Skew Factor
No correction is necessary for a skew angle of zero.
[2.5.2.6.2]
[Table 3.6.1.1.2-1]
Distribution Factor for Deflection

The distribution factor for checking live load deflections assumes that the
entire cross section participates in resisting the live load. The minimum
Multiple Presence Factor (MPF) used by Mn/DOT when checking live load
deflection is 0.85. The deflection distribution factor is:
gD =
(# of lanes) (MPF ) =
(# of beam lines )
4 0.85
= 0.567 lanes/beam
6
Table 5.7.2.3 contains a summary of the live load distribution factors.

Table 5.7.2.3
Distribution Factor Summary (lanes per beam)
Exterior
Beam
Interior
Beam
Loading
[1.3.3 1.3.5]
Flexure
Shear
One Design Lane
0.473
0.720
Two or More Design Lanes
0.698
0.884
Deflection
0.567
One Design Lane
0.733
0.733
Two or More Design Lanes
0.653
0.663
Deflection
0.567
2. Load Modifiers
Strength
Service
Fatigue
Ductility
1.0
1.0
1.0
Redundancy
1.0
1.0
1.0
Importance
1.0
n/a
n/a
= D R I
1.0
1.0
1.0
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-79
3. Dead and Live Load Summary
Beam Selfweight = (786 / 144) 0.155 kip/ft 3 = 0.846 kip/ft
Stool Weight = (2.5 ft ) (0.208 ft ) 0.150 kip/ft 3 = 0.078 kip/ft
Deck Weight = (9.0 ft ) (0.75 ft ) 0.150 kip/ft 3 = 1.013 kip/ft
Future Wearing Surface = 0.020 kip/ft 2 (48 ft ) (1 / 6 ) = 0.160 kip/ft

Barrier Weight = 2 (0.439 kip/ft ) (1 / 6 ) = 0.146 kip/ft
Diaphragm Weight (9.0) [(2) (0.0103) + 0.0149]
17 0.5
+ 2 (4.17)
(0.490) = 0.561 kip
12 12
The bending moments and shears for the dead and live loads were
obtained with a line girder model of the bridge. They are summarized in
Tables 5.7.2.4 and 5.7.2.5.
Table 5.7.2.4
Shear Force Summary (kips/beam)
Trans
Brg
Brg
Load Type/Combination
Point
Face
CL
(0.0') (0.63') (2.38')
Live Loads
Dead Loads
Selfweight
55
54
53
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
Strand
0.1
Critical
Span
Span
Span
Span
Dev
Span
Shear
Point
Point
Point
Point
Point
Point
Point
(5.8') (13.0') (13.6') (26.0') (39.0') (52.0') (65.0')
50
44
44
33
22
11
Stool
Deck
66
65
63
60
53
52
40
26
13
FWS
10
10
10
Barrier
Diaphragms
Total
146
144
141
134
118
113
89
59
29
Uniform Lane
37
36
35
34
30
30
24
18
13
Truck with DLA
79
78
77
75
70
70
62
53
45
36
Total
116
114
112
109
100
100
86
71
58
45
386
380
372
358
323
316
262
198
138
79
262
258
253
243
218
213
175
130
87
45
239
235
231
221
198
193
158
116
75
36
Strength I Load Comb
(1.25 DL + 1.75 LL)

Service I Load Comb
(1.00 DL + 1.00 LL)
Service III Load Comb
(1.00 DL + 0.80 LL)
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-80
Table 5.7.2.5
Bending Moment Summary (kip-ft/beam)
Live Loads
Stool
12
28
59
62
105
138
158
165
Deck
41
154
365
770
802
1370
1798
2054
2140
Diaphragms
15
22
24
24
Total DC1
78
297
701
1479
1542
2634
3459
3952
4116
Barrier
22
53
111
116
197
259
296
308
FWS
24
58
122
127
216
284
324
338
Total DC2
13
46
111
233
243
413
543
620
646
Total (DC1+DC2)
91
343
812
1712
1785
3047
4002
4572
4762
Uniform Lane
18
68
161
340
354
604
793
906
944
Truck with DLA
39
145
343
719
749
1265
1638
1857
1912
Total
57
213
504
1059
1103
1869
2431
2763
2856
214
802
1897
3993
4162
7080
9257
148
556
1316
2771
2888
4916
6433
7335
7618
137
513
1215
2559
2667
4542
5947
6782
7047
DC1
Strength I - Load Comb
(1.25 DL + 1.75 LL)

Service I - Load Comb
(1.00 DL + 1.00 LL)
Service III Load Comb
(1.00 DL + 0.80 LL )
34
128
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
Strand
0.1
Critical
Span
Span
Span
Span
Dev
Span
Shear
Point
Point*
Point
Point
Point
Point
Point
(5.8') (13.0') (13.6') (26.0') (39.0') (52.0') (65.0')
Selfweight
DC2
Dead Loads
Load Type/Combination
Trans
Brg
Brg
Point
Face
CL
(0.0') (0.63') (2.38')
305
643
670
1144
1501
1716
1787
10,550 10,951
* Drape point for strands.
D. Design
Prestressing
Typically the tension at the bottom of the beam at midspan dictates the
required level of prestressing.
1. Estimate Required Prestress
Use the Service III load combination
Bottom of beam stress:

M
M
= DC1 + DC2
S gb S cb
MLL 0.8
S
cb
4116 12 646 12 2856 12 0.8

=
= 4.81 ksi
+
+
21,940
15,390 21,940
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-81
As a starting point, the total prestress losses will be assumed to be 30%.

This results in an effective prestress of
fpe = 0.75 fpu (1 0.30) = 0.75 270 0.70 = 141.8 ksi
Strands are typically placed on a 2" grid. The bottom flange of a 72"
beam can hold a maximum of 48 strands. The centroid of a 48 strand
pattern would be
(# of strands) ( of strands)
y str =
(total # of strands)
10 (2 + 4 + 6 ) + (4 8) + 2 (3 + 5 + 7 + 9 + 11 + 13 + 15)
=
= 5.79 in
48
Using the centroid of this group as an estimate of the strand pattern

eccentricity results in
e 48 = y g 5.79 = 35.60 5.79 = 29.81 in
The area of a 0.6" diameter 7-wire strand is 0.217 in2

The axial compression produced by the prestressing strands is
P = A s fpe = (# of strands) (0.217) (141.8)
The internal moment produced by the prestressing strands is

Mp / s = A s fpe e 48 = (# of strands) 0.217 141.8 29.81
The allowable tension after losses = 0.19
fc = 0.19 8 = 0.54 ksi
This moment and the axial compression from the prestress must reduce
the bottom flange tension from 4.81 ksi tension to a tension of 0.54 ksi
or
Required fpe = 4.81 0.54 = 4.27 ksi
Using the fact that fpe =
P M
+
A S
One can estimate the required number of strands:
NOVEMBER 2005
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
4.27
29.81
1
A + S
gb
g
=
(0.217 141.8)
5-82
4.27
29.81
1
786 + 15,390
= 43.2 strands
(0.217 141.8)
Try a strand pattern with 44 strands.

After reviewing Bridge Details Part II Figure 5-397.517, a 44 strand
draped strand pattern was selected. Also, the drape points were chosen
to be at 0.40L = 52.0 ft from the centerline of bearing locations. The
trial strand pattern is shown in Figure 5.7.2.4.
The properties of this strand pattern at midspan are:
10 (2 + 4 + 6 ) + 2 (3 + 5 + 7 + 8 + 9 + 11 + 13)
y strand =
= 5.27 in
44
e strand = y b y strand = 35.60 5.27 = 30.33 in
Section Modulus at the strand pattern centroid is

S gps =
Ig
e strand
547,920
= 18,065 in3
30.33
Figure 5.7.2.4
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
[5.9.5]
2. Prestress Losses
Prestress losses are computed using the refined method.
[5.9.5.4.4b]
Initial Relaxation Loss

Assume that the prestress is transferred 18 hours after stressing
t=
5-83
18
= 0.75 days
24
fpj = 0.75 fpu = 0.75 270 = 202.50 ksi
[5.9.5.2.3]
fpR1 =
log (24 t ) fpj
0.55 fpj
40
fp
fpR1 =
log (24 0.75) 202.50
0.55 202.50 = 1.80 ksi

40
0.9 270
Elastic Shortening Loss

Use the alternative equation presented in the LRFD C5.9.5.2.3a.
fpES =
A ps fpbt Ig + em2 A g em Mg A g
A ps Ig + em2 A g +
A g Ig Eci
Ep
A ps = (# of strands) (strand area) = 44 0.217 = 9.55 in2

fpbt = fpj fpR1 = 202.50 1.80 = 200.70 ksi
em = e strand = 30.33 in
A g Ig E ci
Ep
786 (547,920)(4347)
= 65,687,764 in6
28,500
A ps Ig + em2 A g = 9.55 [547,920 + (30.33)2 (786 )] = 12,137,748 in6

fpES =
[5.9.5.4.2]
200.70 (12,137,748) 30.33 (1787 ) (12) (786 )

= 24.73 ksi
12,137,748 + 65,687,764
Shrinkage Loss
Use an average humidity for Minnesota of 73%.
fpSR = 17.0 (0.150 H) = 17.0 (0.150 73) = 6.05 ksi
[5.9.5.4.3]
Creep Loss
Non-composite dead load moment excluding selfweight
MDC 1 SW = (4116 1787 ) = 2329 kip-ft
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-84
Composite dead load moment, MDC 2 = 646 kip-ft

y cg y g + e strand
e
fcdp = MDC 1 SW strand + MDC 2
Icg
Ig
30.33
56.29 35.60 + 30.33
= 2329.12
+ 646.12
547,920
1,235,000
= 1.87 ksi
fcgp =
P e
M
Pi
+ i strand sw
Ag
S gps
S gps
Pi = fpj fpR1 fpES A ps = (202.50 1.80 24.73) (9.55) = 1681 kips

fcgp =
1681 1681 (30.33) 1787 (12)

+
= 3.77 ksi
786
18,065
18065
fpCR = 12 fcgp 7 fcdp = (12 3.77) (7 1.87) = 32.15 ksi
[5.9.5.4.4c]
Relaxation Loss After Transfer
fpR2 = 0.30 20 0.4 fpES 0.2 fpSR + fpCR
)]
= 0.30 [20 0.4 24.73 0.2 (6.05 + 32.15)] = 0.74 ksi
[5.9.5.1]
Total Losses
TL = fpES + fpSR + fpCR + fpR2 = 24.73 + 6.05 + 32.15 + 0.74 = 63.67 ksi
fpe = fpj TL = 202.50 63.67 = 138.83 ksi
prestress loss percentage =
[5.9.4.1]
TL
63.67
100 =
100 = 31.4%
202.50
fpj
3. Stresses at Transfer (compression +, tension -)

Stress Limits for P/S Concrete at Release
Compression in the concrete is limited to:
= 0.60 7.0 = 4.20 ksi
0.60 fci
Tension in the concrete is limited to:

= 0.0948 7.0 = 0.25 ksi
The minimum of 0.0948 fci
or 0.20 ksi
Tension limit = -0.20 ksi
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-85
Check Release Stresses at Drape Point (0.40 Point of Span)

Pi e strand = 1681 30.33 = 50,985 kip-in
P P e
1681 50,985
Top stress due to P/S = i i strand =
Ag
786 15,050
S gt
= 1.25 ksi
P
1681 50,985
P e
Bottom Stress due to P/S = i + i strand =
+
Ag
786 15,390
S gb
= 5.45 ksi
Selfweight moment at drape point = Msw0.40 = 1716 kip-ft

M
Top stress due to selfweight = sw0.40
S gt
1716 12
=
= 1.37 ksi
15,050
M
1716 12
Bottom stress due to selfweight = sw0.40 =
= 1.34 ksi
S gb 15,390
Top stress at drape point = 1.25 + 1.37 = 0.12 ksi < 0.20 ksi
OK
Bottom stress at drape point = 5.45 1.34 = 4.11 ksi < 4.20 ksi
OK
Check Release Stresses at End of Beam

The strands need to be draped to raise the eccentricity of the prestress
force and limit the potential for cracking the top of the beams.
Centroid of strand pattern at the end of the beams:

10 (2 + 4 + 6 ) + 2 (8 + 57 + 59 + 61 + 63 + 65 + 67)
y strand =
= 20.0 in
44
The eccentricity of the strand pattern is:

e strand = y b y strand = 35.60 20.00 = 15.60 in
The internal prestress moment is:

Pi e strand = 1681 15.60 = 26,224 kip-in
P P e
1681 26,224
Top stress at end = i i strand =
Ag
786 15,050
S gt
= 0.40 ksi < 0.20 ksi
OK
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-86
P P e
1681 26,224
Bottom stress at end = i i strand =
Ag
786 15,390
Sgb
= 3.84 ksi < 4.20 ksi
OK
For simplicity, the stresses were checked at the end of the beam
assuming the full prestress force was effective. The check could have
been made at the transfer point (60 strand diameters away from the end
of the beam).
[5.9.4.2]
4. Stresses at Service Loads (compression +, tension -)

Stress Limits for P/S Concrete After All Losses
Compression in the concrete is limited to (Service I Load Combination):
0.45 fc = 0.45 8.0 = 3.60 ksi
(for prestress and permanent loads)

Check the bottom stress at end of beam and the top stress at
midspan against this limit.
0.40 fc = 0.40 8.0 = 3.20 ksi
(for live load and 1/2 of prestress and permanent loads)

Check the top stress at midspan against this limit.
0.60 Q w fc = 0.60 1.0 8.0 = 4.80 ksi
(for live load, prestress, permanent loads, and transient loads)

Check the top stress at midspan against this limit.
Tension in the concrete is limited to (Service III Load Combination):
0.19 fc = 0.19 8.0 = 0.54 ksi
Check the bottom stress at midspan against this limit.
Check Stresses at Midspan After Losses:
Let Pe = A ps fpe = 9.55 138.83 = 1326 kips
Bottom stress
MDC 1 MDC 2 MLL 0.8 Pe Pe e strand
+
=
S gb S cb S cb A g
S
gb
4116 12 646 12 2856 12 0.8 1326 1326 30.33

=
+
+

21,940
15,390 21,940
786 15,390
= 0.51 ksi < 0.54 ksi
OK
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-87
Top stress due to all loads

P P e
MDC 1 MDC 2 + MLL
+
= e e strand +
Ag
S gt
S gt
S gtc
1326 1326 30.33 4116 12 (646 + 2856 ) 12

=
+
+

78,610
786 15,050
15,050
= 2.83 ksi < 4.80 ksi
OK
By inspection, top stress due to prestress and permanent loads is less

than 3.60 ksi. Also by inspection, top stress due to live load plus
1
/2 prestress and permanent loads is less than 3.20 ksi.
Check the Compression Stresses at End of Beam After Losses
Bottom flange stress due to prestress and permanent loads
Pe
P e
1326 1326 15.60
+ e strand =
+
= 3.03 ksi < 3.60 ksi
Ag
S
786
15,390
[5.5.4]
OK
5. Flexure Strength Limit State

Resistance factors at the strength limit state are:
= 1.00 for flexure and tension
= 0.90 for shear and torsion
= 1.00 for tension in steel in anchorage zones
Strength I design moment is 10,951 kip-ft at midspan.

Check for rectangular beam behavior by comparing the tensile capacity of
the strands and the compression capacity of the deck.
Tensile strength of 44 strands is: 44 0.217 270 = 2578 kips
Maximum compressive force generated by the deck is
0.85 fc b t s = 0.85 4.0 108 8.5 = 3121 kips
The strands have less capacity than the deck, so assume a rectangular
cross section.
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-88
From previous calculations, distance to strand centroid from bottom of

the beam is:
y strand = 5.27 in
[5.7.3.1.1]
fpy
= 2 1.04 243 = 0.280
k = 2 1.04
270
f
pu
dp = ( beam height ) + stool + deck y strand

= 72 + 1.5 + 8.5 5.27 = 76.73 in
[5.7.3.1.1-4]
A ps fpu
c=
fpu

0.85 fc 1 b k A ps d
p

9
.
55
270
= 8.02 in
=
270
0.85 4.0 0.85 108 + 0.28 9.55

76.73
c
8.02
fps = fpu = 1 k
= 270 1 0.28
= 262.10 ksi
dp
76.73
a = 1 c = 0.85 8.02 = 6.82 in
Internal lever arm between compression and tension flexural force

components:
dp
a
6.82
= 76.73
= 73.32 in
2
2
Mn = A ps fps 73.32 = 9.55 262.10 73.32 = 18,524 kip-in

= 15,294 kip-ft
Mn = 1.0 15,294 = 15,294 kip-ft > Mu = 10,951 kip-ft
[5.7.3.3.1]
OK
6. Limits of Reinforcement
Maximum Reinforcement
The depth of the flexural compressive block is compared to the depth of
the steel centroid to verify adequate ductility.
c
8.02
=
= 0.10 < 0.42
dp
76.73
OK
OCTOBER 2004
[5.7.3.3.2]
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-89
Minimum Reinforcement
fr = 0.24
fpeb =
=
fc = 0.24 8.0 = 0.68 ksi
Pe
P e
+ e strand
Ag
S gb
1326 1326 30.33
+
= 4.30 ksi
786
15,390
S cgb
Mcr = fr + fpeb S cgb MDC 1

1
S gb
21,940
= (0.68 + 4.30) 21,940 (4116 12)

1 = 88,240 kip-in
15,390
= 7353 kip-ft
1.2 Mcr = 1.2 7353 = 8824 < 15,294 kip-ft provided
E. Design
Reinforcement for
Shear
[5.8]
OK
1. Vertical Shear Design

Determine d v and Critical Section for Shear
Begin by assuming a theta angle of 26 degrees. If the theta angle ends
up flatter, the critical section will move towards midspan and the shear
demand will reduce.
Begin by determining the effective shear depth dv at the critical section

for shear.
a
dv = dp
2
The effective shear depth is no less than:
dv 0.72 h = 0.72 (72 + 1.5 + 8.5) = 59.04 in
The internal face is assumed to be at the inside edge of the 15 inch sole
plate. The critical section will be at least 66.54 inches (59.04 + 15 / 2) or
5.55 feet away from the centerline of bearing. Find the centroid of the
prestressing strands at this location:
The centroid of the prestressing strands is at:
5.55 ft.
y end y drape
y str @ dv = y end
0.40 span
5.55
= 20
(20 5.27) = 18.43 in
0.40 130
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-90
With this approximation to the strand centroid, dp can be computed:

dp = h y str @ dv = (72 + 1.5 + 8.5) 18.43 = 63.57 in
From the flexural strength computations, a = 6.82 in

a
6.82
dv = dp = 63.57
= 60.16 in
2
2
But the effective shear depth dv need not be less than
dv 0.72 h = 59.04 in
or
dv 0.9 de = 0.9 dp = 0.9 (63.57) = 57.21 in
Therefore take dv = 60.16 in
Based on the assumed , the critical section location is:
dcritv = 7.5 + 0.5 dv cot () = 7.5 + 0.5 (60.16 ) cot (26 )
= 69.17 in = 5.8 ft
GOVERNS
or
dcritv = 7.5 + dv = 7.5 + 60.16 = 67.63 in
Determine Shear Stress
From Table 5.7.2.4 the Strength I design shear at 5.8 ft is
Vu = 358 kips
The amount of force carried by the draped strands at their effective

prestress level is:
P12d = 12 0.217 138.83 = 361.5 kips
The inclination of the draped strands is:

(62 8) / 12
= arctan
= 4.887 deg rees
52.63
The vertical prestress component is:

Vp = P12d sin () = 361.5 sin (4.887) = 30.8 kips
Compute maximum shear capacity of the section

Vn = 0.25 fc dv b v + Vp = 0.25 8.0 60.16 6.0 + 30.8 = 752.7 kips
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-91
The maximum design shear the section can have is:

v Vn = 0.90 752.7 = 677.4 kips >> 358 kips
Compute the shear stress on the section:

Vu v Vp
v =
v b v dv
358 0.90 30.8

=
0.90 6 60.16 = 1.017 ksi
The ratio of the shear stress to the compressive strength is:

v
1.017
=
= 0.127
fc
8.0
Determine Longitudinal Strain x

Assume that minimum transverse reinforcement will be provided in the
cross section.
First, determine A ps . Note that A ps computed here is different than the

A ps computed earlier.
This A ps includes only the area of prestressing
steel found on the flexural tension side of the member. Near the end of
the beam, A ps must also be reduced for development.
Development length l d is:
2
l d = K fps fpe db
3
= 1.6 262.10 (138.83) (0.6 ) = 162.8 in

3
Transfer length l tr is:

l tr = 60 db = 60 (0.6) = 36.0 in
At the critical section dcritv = 69.14 in from the beam end, the strand
development fraction
Fdev =
fpe
fpu
dcritv l tr
l d l tr
f
1 pe
fpu
138.83 69.14 36.0

138.83
+
1
= 0.641
270
162.8 36.0
270
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-92
The flexural tension side of the member is defined as:

hcomp
2
82.0
= 41.0 in
2
At dcritv none of the draped strands fall on the flexural tension side.
Therefore, A ps = (# straight str.)(strand area)( Fdev )
= (32)(0.217)(0.641) = 4.451 in2
[5.8.3.4.3]
Use equation 5.8.3.4.2-1 to compute the strain:
Mu
d + 0.5 Vu Vp cot () A ps fpo
= v
2 Ep A ps
1897.12
60.16 + 0.5 (358 30.8) cot (26 ) (4.451 0.70 270)
=
2 (28,500 4.451)
127.4
=
= 0.000502
253,707
Because the value is negative, equation three should be investigated with
the additional concrete term:
From Figure 5.4.6.1, A c = 431 in2
x
(
(
Mu
d + 0.5 Vu Vp cot () A ps fpo
= v
2 Ec Ac + Ep A ps
1897.12
60.16 + 0.5 (358 30.8) cot (26 ) (4.451 0.70 270)
=
2 (4578 431 + 28,500 4.451)
127.4
=
= 0.000030
4,199,943
With the strain and shear stress to fc ratio determined, interpolate to
find and in LRFD Table 5.8.3.4.2-1.
= 23.2 degrees
= 2.90
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-93
Since the original assumption for (26 degrees) does not match the
computed angle, do an iteration assuming = 23.2 degrees. Because
new angle is flatter than original assumption, do not revise location of
critical section for shear (conservative).
For = 23.2 degrees, x = 0.000019
Then with
v
= 0.126 and x = 0.000019 , interpolate to get:
fc
= 23.4 degrees (close enough to assumed angle)

= 2.89
Compute the concrete contribution:

Vc = 0.0316 fc b v dv = 0.0316 2.896 8 6 60.16 = 93.2 kips
The required steel contribution is:

Vs = Vn Vc Vp =
Vu
358
Vc Vp =
93.2 30.8 = 273.8 kips
v
0.90
Find the required spacing of double leg #13 stirrups:

s=
A v fy dv cot ()
Vs
2 0.20 60 60.16 cot (23.4)

= 12.2 in
273.8
Provide double leg stirrups at a 12 inch spacing at the end of the beam.
A v = 040 in2 / ft
Vs = 277.9 kips
Other sections are investigated similarly.

[5.8.4]
2. Interface Shear Transfer

Top flange width b v = 30 in
The Strength I vertical shear at the critical shear section due to all
superimposed loads is:
Vu = 1.25 (9 + 9) + 1.75 (109 ) = 213.3
Interface shear force is:

Vh =
Vu
=
de
Vu
dp
a
2
213.3
= 3.55 kip/in
60.16
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-94
Required nominal interface design shear is:

Vn =
Vh 3.55
=
= 3.94 kip/in
v
0.90
The interface area per 1 inch length of beam is:

A cv = 30 1 = 30.0 in2 /in
The upper limits on nominal interface shear are:

0.2 fc A cv = 0.2 4 30.0 = 24.0 kip/in > 3.94 kip/in
OK
and
0.8 A cv = 0.8 30.0 = 24.0 kip/in > 3.94 kip/in
OK
Determine the amount of interface shear carried by cohesion. A note on

the Bridge Details II Fig. 5-397.517 requires the top flanges of the beam
to be roughened. Consequently use a cohesion (c) of 0.100 ksi and a
friction factor ( ) of 1.0.
The nominal interface shear resistance is:
Vn = c A cv + (A vf f + Pc )
Pc = 0.0 kip
Substitute and solve for required interface shear steel:

A vf =
[Eng. 5.8.4.1-4]
V c A cv
3.94 0.1 (30.0)
=
= 0.016 in2 /in = 0.19 in2 /ft
fy
1.0 60
The minimum shear steel that needs to be provided is:

A vf min =
0.05 b v
0.05 30
=
= 0.025 in2 /in = 0.30 in2 /ft
fy
60
The minimum requirement controls.

Vertical shear reinforcement A v = 0.40 in2 /ft > 0.30 in2 /ft at the critical
section for shear. Therefore, no additional reinforcement is required for
interface shear.
Other sections are investigated similarly.
OCTOBER 2004
[5.8.3.5]
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-95
3. Minimum Longitudinal Reinforcement Requirement

Check a diagonal section with a crack starting at the inside edge of the
bearing sole plate.
Straight strands cross the crack at:

sole plate + y 32 cot () = 15 + 4.25 cot (23.4) = 24.82 in
The transfer length for 0.6" strands is:
60 ds = 60 0.6 = 36 in
Interpolate to find the tensile capacity of the straight strands at the

crack:
Tr = fpe A ps
length to crack
24.82
= 138.83 32 0.217
= 664.6 kips
transfer length
36
The force to carry is:
V
T = u 0.5 Vs Vp cot ()
v
358
=
0.5 277.9 30.8 cot (23.4)
0.90
= 526.9 kips < 664.6 kips
F. Design
Pretensioned
Anchorage Zone
Reinforcement
[5.10.10.1]
OK
Bursting Reinforcement
To prevent cracking in the beam end due to the transfer of the
prestressing force from the strands to the concrete, bursting steel needs
to be provided in the anchorage zone.
Use a load factor of 1.0 and lateral force component of 4% to determine

the required amount of steel.
The factored design bursting force is:
Pb = 1.0 0.04 Pi = 1.0 0.04 1681 = 67.2 kips
The amount of resisting reinforcement is determined using a steel stress

fs of 20 ksi:
As =
Pb
67.2
=
= 3.36 in2
fs
20
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-96
This steel should be located at the end of the beam within a distance of:
h 72
=
= 18.0 in
4
4
The number of #16 double legged stirrups necessary to provide this area
is:
As
3.36
=
= 5.4
2 Ab
2 0.31
The first set of stirrups is located 2 inches from the end of the beam.
Provide six sets of #16 stirrups spaced at 3 inch centers.
( 2 + 5 3 = 17 in < 18 in)
[5.10.10.2]
Confinement Reinforcement
Reinforcement is required at the ends of the beam to confine the
prestressing steel in the bottom flange. G1303E and G1607E bars (see
Figure 5.7.2.5) will be placed at a maximum spacing of 6 inches out to
1.5d from the ends of the beam. For simplicity in detailing and ease of
tying the reinforcement, space the vertical shear reinforcement with the
confinement reinforcement in this area.
1.5 d = 1.5 (72) = 108.0 in
G. Determine
Camber and
Deflection
[2.5.2.6.2]
[3.6.1.3.2]
[5.7.3.6.2]
Camber Due to Prestressing and Dead Load Deflection

Using the PCI handbook (Figure 4.10.13 of the 3rd Edition), the camber
due to prestress can be found. The centroid of the prestressing has an
eccentricity emid of 30.33 inches at midspan. At the end of the beams
the eccentricity e e is 15.60 inches. E is the initial concrete modulus
(4347 ksi), Po equals the prestress force just after transfer (1681 kips).
The drape points are at 0.4 of the span. The span length is 130.0 feet.
Using the equation for the two point depressed strand pattern:
e = emid e e = 30.33 15.60 = 14.73 in
ps =
Po e e L2 Po e L2 a2
8 EI
EI 8
6
1681(15.60)(130 12)2
1681(14.73) (130 12)2 (0.4 130 12)2
+
8 (4347)(547,920)
4347(547,920)
8
6
= 5.84 in
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-97
Downward deflection due to selfweight

0.846
(130 12)4
5
5 w L4
12
sw =
=
= 2.28 in
384 E I 384 4347 547,920
Camber at release rel = ps sw = 5.84 2.28 = 3.56 in
To estimate camber at the time of erection the deflection components are
multiplied by standard PCI handbook multipliers. (See Figure 4.6.3 of
the 3rd Edition.) They are:
Release to Erection Multipliers:
Prestress = 1.80
Selfweight = 1.85
Camber and selfweight deflection values at erection are:
1.80 5.84 = 10.51 in
Prestress:
1.85 ( 2.28) = 4.22 in
Selfweight:
0.03 in
Diaphragm DL:
2.84 in
Deck and stool DL:
0.17 in
Parapet:
The values to be placed in the camber diagram on the beam plan sheet
are arrived at by combining the values above.
Initial Total Camber
10.51 4.22 0.03 = 6.26 in
say 61/4 in
Est. Dead Load Deflection

2.84 + 0.17 = 3.01 in
say 3 in
Est. Residual Camber

61/4 3 = 31/4 in
Live Load Deflection
The deflection of the bridge is checked when subjected to live load and
compared against the limiting values of L/800 for vehicle only bridges and
L
/1000 for bridges with bicycle or pedestrian traffic.
Deflection due to lane load is:
lane
0.64
4
5 w L4 5 12 (130 12)
=
=
= 0.73 in
384 E I 384 4578 1,235,000
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-98
Deflection due to a truck with dynamic load allowance is found using

hand computations or computer tools to be:
truck = 1.46 in
Two deflections are computed and compared to the limiting values; that
of the truck alone and that of the lane load plus 25% of the truck. Both
deflections need to be adjusted with the distribution factor for deflection.
1 = DF truck = 0.567 1.46 = 0.83 in
2 = DF ( lane + 0.25 truck ) = 0.567 (0.73 + 0.25 1.46 ) = 0.62 in
There is no bicycle or pedestrian traffic on the bridge, the deflection limit

is:
L
130 12
OK
=
= 1.95 in >> than 1 or 2
800
800
H. Detailing Items
Approximate weight of each beam is:

L A y = 131.25 ft
786 in2
2
144 in /ft
0.155 kips
ft
1 ton
= 55.5 tons
2 kips
Initial prestress force at jacking is:

44 0.217 0.75 270 = 1933 kips
Figure 5.7.2.5 shows the detailed beam sheet for the bridge.
NOVEMBER 2005
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 5.7.2.5
5-99
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-100
OCTOBER 2004
5.7.3 Three-Span
Haunched PostTensioned Concrete
Slab Design
Example
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-101
This example illustrates the design of a haunched post-tensioned

concrete slab bridge. The three continuous spans are 55'-0", 70'-0", and
55'-0" in length. The roadway width is 44'-0" with Mn/DOT Type F
barrier railings for a total out-to-out width of 47'-4". A plan view and
typical sections of the bridge are shown in Figures 5.7.3.1 and 5.7.3.2.
After computing the dead and live loads, a preliminary tendon profile is
developed. Prestress losses for the preliminary layout are computed for
anchor set, friction, elastic shortening, creep, shrinkage, and relaxation.
Subsequently, the load combinations are assembled (with the secondary
post-tensioning force effects included). Flexural and shear strength
checks are performed, after which deflection and camber calculations are
assembled. Lastly, the design of the anchorage zone is performed.
Single ended jacking is assumed for the design.
The construction
documents will require that the jacked end and the dead ends alternate.
With the tendons stressed at alternating ends, the results for the friction
losses and anchor set losses for tendons stressed at opposite ends will be
averaged to obtain losses for a typical tendon.
A. Material and
Design Parameters
The following material and design parameters are used in this example:
Table 5.7.3.1
Design Parameters
Material
[5.4.3.2]
Steel Reinforcement
[5.4.4.2]
Rebar
[Table 5.4.4.1-1]
Prestressing
Concrete
[5.4.2.4]
Parameter
Value
Compressive Strength at Transfer, fci
4.5 ksi
Compressive Strength at 28 days, fc
5.0 ksi
Modulus of Elasticity at Transfer, Eci
3865 ksi
Modulus of Elasticity at 28 days, Ec
4074 ksi
7-wire Strand
0.60 in dia., low-lax
Area of one Strand
0.217 in 2
Tensile Strength, fpu
270.0 ksi
Yield Strength, fpy
243.0 ksi
Modulus of Elasticity, Ep
28,500 ksi
Yield Strength, Fy
60 ksi
Modulus of Elasticity, Es
29,000 ksi
Additional Dead Loads

Future Wearing Surface = 0.020 ksf
Type F Barriers, w = 0.439 kip/ft/barrier
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 5.7.3.1
Bridge Layout
5-102
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 5.7.3.2
Transverse and Longitudinal Sections
5-103
OCTOBER 2004
B. Haunch Length
and Minimum
Recommended Slab
Depth
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-104
MnDOTs standard design practice is to use linear haunches, with a

haunch length of 15% of the length of the longest span in the continuous
system.
Haunch Length:
0.15 70 = 10.5 ft
[2.5.2.6.3]
Use 10.5 ft
The depth of the slab at midspan can be estimated with:

0.95 (0.027 L ) = 0.95 (0.027 70) = 1.80 ft
Use 1.83 ft
A trial depth of the slab at the piers can be found with:

4
4
(midspan slab depth) = (1.80) = 2.39 ft
3
3
C. Live Load Strip

Widths and
Distribution Factors
[4.6.2.3]
[3.6.1.1.1]
Use 2.50 ft
The equations in the LRFD Specifications are arranged to determine the

width of slab that resists a particular live load. To simplify the design
process (which is based on a 1 foot wide design strip) the resultant
widths are rearranged to determine the fraction of lane load carried by a
1 foot wide strip of slab.
Distribution Factor for Flexure One Lane Loaded
The equation used to find the width of slab resisting one lane of live
loading is:
E = 10.0 + 5.0
L 1 W1
Where:
L 1 is the modified span length (the smaller of the actual span length
and 60 feet)
W1 is the modified bridge width (the smaller of the actual width and
30 feet)
Substituting in values for the side and main spans produces:

55 ft Spans:
Es = 10.0 + 5.0
55 30 = 213.1 in/lane
1
1 12
=
= 0.056 lanes/ft
Es 213.1 1
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-105
70 ft Span:
Es = 10.0 + 5.0
60 30 = 222.1 in/lane
1
1 12
=
= 0.054 lanes/ft
Es 222.1 1
Distribution Factor for Flexure Multiple Lanes Loaded
A similar procedure is used to determine the width of slab that carries
multiple lanes of live load. The general equation is:
E = 84.0 + 1.44
L 1 W1
12.0 W
NL
Where:
L 1 is the modified span length (smaller of the span length and
60 ft)
W1 is the modified bridge width (smaller of the bridge width and
60 ft)
W is the physical edge-to-edge width of the bridge (47.33 ft)
NL is the number of design lanes:
44
= 3.7
Use 3
NL =
12
Substituting values into the equations for the side and main spans
produces:
55 ft Spans:
12.0 47.33
= 189.3 in/lane
Em = 84.0 + 1.44 55 47.33 = 157.5
3
1
1 12
=
= 0.076 lanes/ft
Em 157.5 1
70 ft Span:
Em = 84.0 + 1.44
60 47.33 = 160.7
12.0 47.33
= 189.3 in/lane
3
1
1 12
=
= 0.075 lanes/ft
Em 160.7 1
Distribution Factor for Shear
The shear check is performed with a single distribution factor where all
design lanes are loaded and the entire slab is assumed to participate in
carrying the load.
MPF
0.85
E v = (# of lanes)
= 3
= 0.054 lanes/ft
deck width
47.33
OCTOBER 2004
[2.5.2.6.2]
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-106
Distribution Factor for Deflection

Deflection computations should be based on the same distribution factor
calculated for shear forces:
E = E v = 0.054 lanes/ft
D. Edge Beam
Width and
Distribution Factor
[4.6.2.1.4]
The exterior strip is assumed to carry one wheel line and a tributary
portion of lane live load.
Check if the equivalent strip is less than the maximum width of
72 inches.
(strip width)
E = (edge of slab to inside face of barrier ) + 12.0 +
2
E = 20 + 12 +
157.4
= 110.7 in > 72.0 in
2
Use 72.0 in
Compute the distribution factor associated with one truck wheel line:
1 wheel line ( MPF )

LLDFEXTT =
(
)
(
)
2
wheel
lines/lane
E
/
12
1 (1.2)
=
= 0.100 lanes/ft
2 (72 / 12)
Compute the distribution factor associated with lane load on a 72 inch
wide exterior strip. Subtract the gutter line to edge of deck distance to
obtain the deck width loaded:
LLDFEXTL
deck width loaded
MPF
10 ft. load width
=
(exterior strip width)
LLDFEXTL
72 / 12 20 / 12
1.2
10
lanes/ft
=
72 / 12
For simplicity, the larger value (0.100 lanes/ft) is used for both load
types when assembling design forces for the exterior strip.
Table 5.7.3.2 summarizes the distribution factors for the different force
components.
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-107
Table 5.7.3.2
Distribution Factor Summary
Force Component
Width
Type of Loading
One Lane
Flexure
Interior Strip
Multiple Lanes
Span
(ft)
Distribution Factor
(lanes/ft)
55
0.056
70
0.054
55
0.076
70
0.075
Exterior Strip
One Lane
55 & 70
0.100
Shear
Slab Width
Multiple Lanes
55 & 70
0.054
Deflections
Slab Width
Multiple Lanes
55 & 70
0.054
E. Load
Combinations, Load
Factors, and Load
Modifiers
[3.4.1]
[1.3.3-1.3.5]
Strength
Service
Fatigue
Ductility
1.0
1.0
1.0
Redundancy
1.0
1.0
1.0
Importance
1.0
n/a
n/a
= D R I
1.0
1.0
1.0
The load combinations considered for the design example are identified
below:
STRENGTH I Used to ensure adequate strength under normal vehicular
use.
U = 1.0 [1.25 DC + 1.25 DW + 1.75 (LL + IM)]
SERVICE I Used for compression checks in prestressed concrete.

U = 1.0 (DC + DW ) + 1.0 (LL + IM)
SERVICE III Used for tension checks in prestressed concrete for crack
control purposes.
U = 1.0 (DC + DW ) + 0.8 (LL + IM)
[5.5.3.1]
FATIGUE No fatigue check is necessary for fully prestressed sections.
OCTOBER 2004
F. Live Loads
[3.6.1]
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-108
The HL-93 live load components used for this example are:
Design Truck
Design Lane
Design Tandem
Truck Train
The live load components are combined in the following manner:
Design Truck + Design Lane
Design Tandem + Design Lane
0.90 (Truck Train + Design Lane)
(Neg. Moment Regions)
[3.6.2]
Dynamic Load Allowance

The dynamic load allowance, (IM) for truck and tandem live loads is
33% for all applicable limit states and load combinations.
G. Dead Loads
Interior Strip (1'-0" Width)

The 2 inch wearing course is included in the slab depth (h) used to
determine the dead loads (wDC ) . It is not considered part of the
structural section resisting loads.
2 wbarrier
wDC = (width) w c h +
deck width
2 0.439
= (1.0) 0.150 h +
= 0.150 h + 0.019 kip/ft
47.33
For design simplicity the dead load associated with the future wearing
surface (0.020 ksf) is combined with the other DC loads.
wDC = 0.150 h + 0.019 + 0.020 = 0.150 h + 0.039 kip/ft
Edge Strip (1'-0" Width)

For the design of the edge strip, it is conservatively assumed that the
dead load of one barrier is carried by each edge strip.
0.439
wDC = 0.150 h +
= 0.150 h + 0.073 kip/ft
6.0
The future wearing surface load is:
6.0 1.67
wDW = 0.120
= 0.014 kip/ft
6.0
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-109
The combined dead load is:

wDC = 0.150 h + 0.073 + wDW = 0.150 h + 0.087 kip/ft
H. Structural
Analysis Model and
Resultant Loads
The dead and live loads were applied to a continuous beam model with
gross section properties. Nonprismatic properties were used to account
for the presence of the linear haunches near the piers. The results of the
analysis are presented in Tables 5.7.3.3 and 5.7.3.4.
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-110
Table 5.7.3.3
Moment Load Components (kip-ft)
Dead Load (per ft)
Live Load (per lane)*
Span
Point
Interior Strip
Exterior Strip
MDC
MDC
Max.
Min.
Max.
Min.
Max.
Min.
Min.
1.0
Lane
Truck
Tandem
Truck Train
1.1
31
35
78
-20
263
-47
227
-36
1.2
51
59
136
-39
433
-94
384
-71
1.3
62
71
175
-59
519
-140
475
-107
1.4
62
71
195
-78
552
-187
507
-142
1.5
52
59
196
-98
534
-234
492
-178
1.6
31
36
177
-118
476
-281
437
-213
1.7
138
-137
359
-327
345
-249
-286
1.8
-40
-46
83
-159
204
-374
228
-284
-380
1.9
-92
-105
52
-225
116
-421
97
-320
-516
2.0
-155
-177
46
-335
129
-468
102
-355
-698
2.1
-78
-89
42
-190
77
-335
118
-265
-483
2.2
-20
-23
71
-109
246
-284
268
-224
-303
2.3
22
25
133
-93
416
-232
392
-183
2.4
47
53
181
-93
520
-180
472
-143
2.5
55
63
196
-93
545
-129
496
-102
* Values do not include dynamic load allowance.
Table 5.7.3.4
Shear Load Components (kips)
Span
Point
Dead Load
(per ft)
1.0
1.1
Live Load (per lane)*

Lane
Truck
Tandem
Max.
Min.
Max.
Min.
Max.
Min.
6.5
15.9
-3.6
56.7
-8.5
47.7
-6.5
4.7
12.6
-3.8
47.8
-8.5
41.2
-6.5
1.2
2.8
9.8
-4.5
39.4
-8.5
34.9
-10.5
1.3
0.9
7.4
-5.6
31.4
-14.1
28.8
-16.8
1.4
-0.9
5.4
-7.1
24.1
-22.0
23.0
-22.8
1.5
-2.8
3.8
-9.1
17.4
-29.6
17.7
-28.5
1.6
-4.6
2.6
-11.4
11.6
-37.6
12.8
-33.7
1.7
-6.5
1.8
-14.1
6.5
-45.2
8.5
-38.5
1.8
-8.3
1.2
-17.0
2.3
-52.1
4.9
-42.6
1.9
-10.4
0.9
-20.3
2.3
-58.2
1.9
-46.0
2.0
12.4
25.1
-2.7
64
-63.6
49
-49
2.1
9.6
20.7
-2.8
57.4
-7.4
45.2
-5.8
2.2
7.1
16.8
-3.3
49.9
-7.4
40.7
-6.6
2.3
4.7
13.2
-4.3
41.7
-10.2
35.3
-11.6
2.4
2.4
10.2
-5.7
33.3
-17.1
29.4
-17.2
2.5
0.0
7.7
-7.7
24.9
-24.9
23.3
-23.3
* Values do not include dynamic load allowance.
OCTOBER 2004
I. Develop
Preliminary Tendon
Profile
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-111
Begin by determining the eccentricity of the tendon at primary locations

and calculating the dead load and live load moments. Preliminary runs
with assumed prestress losses are used to determine an appropriate
tendon area or tendon force per foot. The prestress needs to provide
zero tension stress in the slab at the service limit state. For this
example, a 12 strand (0.6 inch diameter) tendon is found to be
appropriate when spaced at 2'-5".
A handful of suppliers provide post-tensioning products in the U.S.
Catalogs from the suppliers should be reviewed to ensure that standard
tendons and ducts are used. LRFD Article 5.4.6.2 places maximum and
minimum limits on the size of ducts based on the size of the tendon and
the least concrete dimension of the member.
The tendon low points for the side spans will be placed at Span Points 1.4
and 3.6 (22 ft away from the abutment end of the span). The tendon low
point for the center span will be placed at midspan (Span Point 2.5). The
tendon high points will be located over the piers at Span Points 2.0 and
3.0. The tendon will be at the centroid of the gross cross section at each
end of the structure (Span Points 1.0 and 4.0). See Figure 5.7.3.3 for a
sketch of the proposed tendon profile and tendon centroid locations at
high and low points of the tendon profile.
Critical points of the tendon geometry are calculated as:
dtop at Span Point 1.0 = 11.00 in
dtop at Span Points 1.4 and 2.5 = 22 - 1.5 - 0.625 - 2.25 = 17.63 in
dtop at Span Points 2.0 = 3 + 0.625 + 2.25 = 5.88 in
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 5.7.3.3
Tendon Profile and Centroid Locations
5-112
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-113
Tendon Equations
The tendon profile can be defined with a series of parabolas where for
each parabola:
y = a x2 + b x + c
With the section depth varying along the slab, use the top of the slab as
the datum for defining the parabolic curves. The tendon profile is
described with three parabolas; one describing the positive moment
region of the side spans, a second describing the negative moment
regions over the piers, and lastly a third parabola describing the positive
moment region of the center span. Using the constraints:
y= 11.00 inches at x = 0 feet
y = 17.63 inches at x = 22 feet
Slope = 0 at x = 22 feet
The equation for the parabola for the positive moment regions of the side
spans is found to be:
y = ( 0.01369 ) x 2 + (0.6023) x + 11.00
(x in feet, y in inches)
Knowing that the y-coordinate and the slope for the tendon profile needs
to be consistent at the location where parabolas meet, the second and
third parabolas can be found.
Set the origin for the second parabola to be at Span Point 2.0. The
following constraints can be used to determine the constants for the
parabola:
y at the end of the curve matches that of the 1st parabola
Slope at the end of the curve matches that of the 1st parabola
The location where the 1st and 2nd parabolas meet was found by changing
the length of the 2nd parabola until the y value and slope matched that of
the 1st parabola. The parabolas satisfy the criteria if they meet at a point
7.00 feet away from the pier (Span Point 1.873). The equation for the
2nd parabola is:
y = (0.05092 ) x 2 + (0) x + 5.875
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-114
With the 2nd parabola defined, the same procedure can be used to
determine the constants for the 3rd parabola. With x = 0 at Span Point
2.5, the constants are:
y at the end of the curve matches that of the 2nd parabola
Slope at the end of the curve matches that of the 2nd parabola
After iterating the length of the 3rd parabola, the location where the y
values and slopes match for the 2nd and 3rd parabolas is at a location
7.00 feet away from the pier (Span Point 2.1). The equation for the 2nd
parabola is:
y = ( 0.0118) x 2 + (0) x + 17.625
Tendon Geometry
The tendon profile information for different points along the bridge are
presented in Table 5.7.3.5. The equations presented above are in mixed
units with the y values in inches and the x values in feet. To arrive at the
tendon slopes in radians, the equation constants were divided by 12.
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-115
* Tendon Centroid (in)
22.00
11.00
11.00
0.00
+/- 0.050
0.000/180.094
0.000/0.559
1.1/3.9
22.00
11.00
13.90
-2.90
+/- 0.038
5.505/174.588
0.013/0.546
1.2/3.8
22.00
11.00
15.97
-4.97
+/- 0.025
11.008/169.086
0.025/0.534
1.3/3.7
22.00
11.00
17.21
-6.21
+/- 0.013
16.509/163.585
0.038/0.521
1.4/3.6
22.00
11.00
17.63
-6.63
0.000
22.009/158.084
0.050/0.508
1.5/3.5
22.00
11.00
17.21
-6.21
-/+ 0.013
27.509/152.584
0.063/0.496
1.6/3.4
22.00
11.00
15.97
-4.97
-/+ 0.025
33.010/147.083
0.075/0.483
1.7/3.3
22.00
11.00
13.90
-2.90
-/+ 0.038
38.513/141.581
0.088/0.471
1.8/3.2
22.96
11.48
11.00
0.48
-/+ 0.050
44.018/136.075
0.100/0.458
Cumulative Angle
Change (radians)
Section Centroid (in)
1.0/4.0
Cumulative Length of
Tendon (ft)
Depth of Section (in)
Tendon Slope (radians)
Span Point
Tendon Eccentricity (in)
Table 5.7.3.5
Tendon Geometry
1.873/3.127
25.52
12.76
8.37
4.39
-/+ 0.059
48.024/132.069
0.110/0.449
1.9/3.1
26.48
13.24
7.42
5.82
-/+ 0.047
49.527/130.567
0.122/0.436
2.0/3.0
30.00
15.00
5.88
9.13
0.000
55.029/125.065
0.169/0.390
2.1/2.9
25.52
12.76
8.37
4.39
+/- 0.059
62.033/118.061
0.224/0.334
2.2/2.8
22.00
11.00
12.42
-1.42
+/- 0.041
69.041/111.053
0.238/0.321
2.3/2.7
22.00
11.00
15.31
-4.31
+/- 0.028
76.045/104.049
0.252/0.307
2.4/2.6
22.00
11.00
17.05
-6.05
+/- 0.014
83.047/97.047
0.266/0.293
2.5
22.00
11.00
17.63
-6.63
0.000
90.047
0.279
* Measured from top of structural slab.
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-116
J. Initial Prestress
Losses
Calculate the prestress losses due to friction, anchor set, and elastic
shortening.
[5.9.5.2.2]
Friction Losses
An exponential equation is used to determine the friction losses at
different tendon locations.
fpF = fpj 1 e (K x + )
where:
fpj = stress in prestressing steel at jacking (ksi)
= length of prestressing tendon between any two points (ft)
= wobble coefficient from LRFD Table 5.9.5.2.2b-1
= coefficient of friction from LRFD Table 5.9.5.2.2b-1
Use 0.0002
Use 0.25
= absolute value of angular change of prestressing path

between two points (radians)
The friction coefficients assume that the strands are installed in rigid
galvanized ducts.
The ratio of the force in the tendon to the force at any location after
friction losses (Friction Factor) is summarized in Table 5.7.3.6.
[5.9.5.2.1]
Anchor Set Losses

The release of the tensioning jack from the PT tendon is accomplished by
engaging strand wedges in the permanent anchor plate.
A small
shortening displacement in the tendon is necessary to seat the wedges.
During construction, the tendon displacement is dependent on the jacking
equipment used (some jacks can power seat wedges, others cannot).
For design, a typical seating displacement is assumed (a standard value
is 0.375 inches). The effective tension in the post-tensioning tendons at
the jacking end is reduced due to the shortening of the tendon. This
localized loss in tendon stress is called anchor set. The effect of anchor
set is represented in Figure 5.7.3.4.
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-117
Figure 5.7.3.4
Assume the anchor set is 0.375 inches and use the friction losses at the
dead end of the tendon to compute d. Assume the tendons are
stressed to 80% of GUTS (Guaranteed Ultimate Tensile Strength):
f jack = 0.80 fpu = 0.80 270.0 = 216.0 ksi
The jacking stress at the dead end after friction losses is:
fL = f jack (friction factor ) = 216.0 0.839 = 181.2 ksi
d represents the friction loss between the two end points:

d = f jack fL = 216.0 181.2 = 34.8 ksi
With L and d determined, the slope of the friction loss line is known.
The increase in stress in the tendon as one moves away from the jacking
end is assumed to have the same slope. With that assumption, the
relationship between stress loss at the anchor and the location where the
anchor loss dissipates can be found:
X = f
2
L

d
The change in stress due to anchor set is found with Hookes law:
=
f
L
= E = E
2
12 X
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-118
Which can be substituted into the earlier equation:

L L

X = E
12
X d
Which leads to:

X2 =
E L L 28,500 0.375 180.094

= 4609
=
12 d
12 34.8
and
X = 67.9 ft
Which, when put into the Hookes law, determines the change in stress
due to anchor set:
E L E L
=
f = 2
12 X 6 X
28,500 0.375
=
= 26.2 ksi
6 67.9
The stress at the anchor is:

fanchor = f jack f = 216.0 26.2 = 189.8 ksi
The stress in the tendon between the anchor and point X can be found
with interpolation.
[5.9.5.2.3]
Elastic Shortening Losses

Elastic shortening losses for post-tensioned structures vary with the
number of tendons used and the jacking processes followed. The LRFD
Specifications provide a straightforward equation to estimate the
prestress losses associated with elastic shortening for design.
fpES = 0.25
Ep
Eci
fcgp
The concrete stress at the height of the tendon when the slab is
subjected to only dead load and prestress forces is computed for Span
Point 2.5 in Section N and found to be:
fcgp =
=
PT
A
PT e2
I
MDL e
I
211.1 211.1 6.632 (52 + 19.8) 12 6.63

+
= 1.1 ksi
264
10,650
10,650
fpES = 0.25
28,500
1.1 = 2.0 ksi
3865
NOVEMBER 2005
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-119
Table 5.7.3.6 summarizes the stresses in the tendon at tenth point span
point locations.
Losses associated with friction, anchor set, elastic
shortening, shrinkage, creep, and relaxation (see Part N of this example
for calculation of Shrinkage, Creep, and Relaxation losses) are presented.
Initial and final tendon stresses are also presented.
Span Point
Friction
Factor
Jacking
Stress
Anchor Set
Loss
Net Stress
Reversed Net
Stress
Average
Tendon
Stress
Elastic
Shortening
Loss
Initial
Tendon
Stress
Shrinkage
Loss
Creep Loss
Relaxation
Loss
Final Tendon
Stress
Table 5.7.3.6
Tendon Stresses (ksi)
1.0
1.000
216.0
26.2
189.8
181.2
185.5
2.0
183.5
4.5
13.0
4.7
161.3
1.1
0.996
215.1
24.1
191.0
182.0
186.5
2.0
184.5
4.5
13.0
4.7
162.3
1.2
0.992
214.2
22.0
192.2
182.7
187.5
2.0
185.5
4.5
13.0
4.7
163.3
1.3
0.987
213.3
19.8
193.4
183.5
188.5
2.0
186.5
4.5
13.0
4.7
164.3
1.4
0.983
212.4
17.7
194.7
184.3
189.5
2.0
187.5
4.5
13.0
4.7
165.3
1.5
0.979
211.5
15.6
195.9
185.1
190.5
2.0
188.5
4.5
13.0
4.7
166.3
1.6
0.975
210.6
13.5
197.1
185.9
191.5
2.0
189.5
4.5
13.0
4.7
167.3
1.7
0.971
209.7
11.3
198.3
186.7
192.5
2.0
190.5
4.5
13.0
4.7
168.3
1.8
0.967
208.8
9.2
199.6
187.5
193.5
2.0
191.5
4.5
13.0
4.7
169.3
1.9
0.960
207.4
7.1
200.3
188.7
194.5
2.0
192.5
4.5
13.0
4.7
170.3
2.0
0.948
204.8
5.0
199.8
191.1
195.5
2.0
193.5
4.5
13.0
4.7
171.3
2.1
0.934
201.7
2.3
199.4
194.0
196.7
2.0
194.7
4.5
13.0
4.7
172.5
2.2
0.929
200.7
0.0
200.7
195.0
197.9
2.0
195.9
4.5
13.0
4.7
173.7
2.3
0.925
199.8
0.0
199.8
195.9
197.8
2.0
195.8
4.5
13.0
4.7
173.6
2.4
0.920
198.8
0.0
198.8
196.9
197.8
2.0
195.8
4.5
13.0
4.7
173.6
2.5
0.916
197.8
0.0
197.8
197.8
197.8
2.0
195.8
4.5
13.0
4.7
173.6
2.6
0.911
196.9
0.0
196.9
198.8
197.8
2.0
195.8
4.5
13.0
4.7
173.6
2.7
0.907
195.9
0.0
195.9
199.8
197.8
2.0
195.8
4.5
13.0
4.7
173.6
2.8
0.903
195.0
0.0
195.0
200.7
197.9
2.0
195.9
4.5
13.0
4.7
173.7
2.9
0.898
194.0
0.0
194.0
199.4
196.7
2.0
194.7
4.5
13.0
4.7
172.5
3.0
0.885
191.1
0.0
191.1
199.8
195.5
2.0
193.5
4.5
13.0
4.7
171.3
3.1
0.874
188.7
0.0
188.7
200.3
194.5
2.0
192.5
4.5
13.0
4.7
170.3
3.2
0.868
187.4
0.0
187.4
199.6
193.5
2.0
191.5
4.5
13.0
4.7
169.3
3.3
0.864
186.7
0.0
186.7
198.3
192.5
2.0
190.5
4.5
13.0
4.7
168.3
3.4
0.860
185.9
0.0
185.9
197.1
191.5
2.0
189.5
4.5
13.0
4.7
167.3
3.5
0.857
185.1
0.0
185.1
195.9
190.5
2.0
188.5
4.5
13.0
4.7
166.3
3.6
0.853
184.3
0.0
184.3
194.7
189.5
2.0
187.5
4.5
13.0
4.7
165.3
3.7
0.850
183.5
0.0
183.5
193.4
188.5
2.0
186.5
4.5
13.0
4.7
164.3
3.8
0.846
182.7
0.0
182.7
192.2
187.5
2.0
185.5
4.5
13.0
4.7
163.3
3.9
0.842
182.0
0.0
182.0
191.0
186.5
2.0
184.5
4.5
13.0
4.7
162.3
4.0
0.839
181.2
0.0
181.2
189.8
185.5
2.0
183.5
4.5
13.0
4.7
161.3
NOVEMBER 2005
K. Check Stress
Limits on
Prestressing
Strands
[Table 5.9.3-1]
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-120
Stress Limits for Prestressing Strands:

Prior to seating
fs 0.90 fpy = 218.7 ksi
At anchorages after anchor set
fs 0.70 fpu = 189.0 ksi
End of seating zone after anchor set
fs 0.74 fpu = 199.8 ksi
At service limit after losses
fs 0.80 fpy = 194.4 ksi
A review of the values in Table 5.7.3.6 indicates that none of the stress
limits are exceeded.
L. Summary of
Analysis Results
From this point forward, the design of an interior strip at points of

maximum positive and negative moment subject to dead and live loads
will be presented. The design procedure for the edge strip is similar. A
summary of bending moments obtained at different locations along the
superstructure for a 1 foot wide design strip is presented in
Table 5.7.3.7. The analysis results are symmetric about midspan of the
center span.
Secondary Post-Tensioning Forces
The linear haunches complicate the analysis of the slab superstructure.
The nonprismatic section, combined with the parabolic tendon profiles
prevent an easy hand method from being used to determine the
secondary moments associated with post-tensioning a continuous
superstructure.
Therefore, a beam analysis program was used to
determine secondary post-tensioning forces.
The tensioning of the tendon redistributes the dead load reactions of the
superstructure.
For the design example the redistribution was an
increase in the abutment reaction of 0.87 kips and a corresponding
reduction in the pier reactions of 0.87 kips. This implies that the positive
moment regions of the tendon profile introduced slightly more curvature
into the superstructure than the negative moment regions.
The
secondary moments associated with the redistribution amount to a
linearly increasing positive moment in the side spans (0.0 kip-ft at the
abutments and 47.9 kip-ft at the piers). The secondary moment in the
center span is a constant positive value of 47.9 kip-ft.
NOVEMBER 2005
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-121
Table 5.7.3.7
Interior Strip Moment Summary (per foot)
Span
Point
MDC
(kip-ft)
PT Secondary
Moments
(kip-ft)
* Truck
+ Lane
(kip-ft)
Max.
Min.
* Tandem + Lane
(kip-ft)
Max.
Min.
* 0.9 (Truck Tr
+ Lane)
(kip-ft)
1.0
0.0
1.1
31
4.8
32.5
-6.3
28.9
-5.2
1.2
51
9.6
54.1
-12.5
49.2
-10.1
1.3
62
14.4
65.8
-18.6
61.3
-15.3
1.4
62
19.1
70.6
-24.8
66.1
-20.3
1.5
52
23.9
68.9
-31.1
64.6
-25.4
1.6
31
28.7
61.6
-37.4
57.6
-30.5
1.7
33.5
46.8
-43.5
45.4
-35.6
-35.4
1.8
-40
38.3
26.9
-49.9
29.4
-40.8
-45.4
1.9
-92
43.1
15.7
-59.7
13.8
-49.5
-62.3
2.0
-155
47.9
16.5
-72.8
13.8
-61.3
-86.4
2.1
-78
47.9
11.0
-48.3
15.1
-41.2
-56.9
2.2
-20
47.9
30.3
-37.0
32.5
-30.9
-35.0
2.3
22
47.9
52.2
-30.5
49.7
-25.6
2.4
47
47.9
66.3
-25.3
61.5
-21.5
2.5
55
47.9
70.0
-20.1
65.0
-17.4
* Includes dynamic load allowance.
OCTOBER 2004
M. Check Stress
Limits on Concrete
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
The service limit state stresses at each of the critical locations are
evaluated using the general equation (compression +, tension -):
f =
[5.9.4]
5-122
P MP MS
+
+
A
S
S
where MP is the total prestress moment and MS is the service moment.

The stress limits are:
At Transfer
ft = 0 ksi
Tension
= 2.7 ksi
fc 0.60 fci
Compression
At Final
Tension
Compression
DC + PT + LL + IM
DC + PT
1
/2 ( DC + PT ) + LL + IM
ft = 0 ksi
fc 0.60 fc = 3.0 ksi
fc 0.45 fc = 2.25 ksi
fc 0.40 fc = 2.0 ksi
Check Location 1.0 (Interior Strip)

Unfactored DC and PT Secondary Moment = 0 kip-ft
Tendon stress at transfer = 183.5 ksi
Tendon stress at final = 183.5 0.11 (0.80 270) = 159.7 ksi
(assumes 11% long term losses)

12 (0.217)
= 1.078 in2 /ft
Area of strand per foot =
2.42
Prestress force at transfer: Pi = 183.5 1.078 = 197.8 kips
Prestress force at final: Pf = 159.7 1.078 = 172.2 kips
Prestress eccentricity: e = 0 in
Concrete area: A = 12 22 = 264 in2
12 222
Concrete section modulus: S =
= 968 in3
6
Check the stress in the concrete. Because the dead and live load
moment and the prestress eccentricity are all equal to zero, the top and
bottom fiber concrete stress is the same:
P
197.8
At transfer:
= 0.75 ksi < 2.7 ksi
OK
fb = ft = i =
A
264
At final:
fb = ft =
Pf
172.2
=
= 0.65 ksi < 2.0 ksi
A
264
OK
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-123

Unfactored DC and PT Secondary Moment:
MDC + PT = 62 + 19.1 = 81.1 kip-ft
Service I Moment: MSI = 62 + 19.1 + 70.6 = 151.7 kip-ft
Service III Moment: MSIII = 62 + 19.1 + 0.8 (70.6 ) = 137.6 kip-ft

12 (0.217)
= 1.078 in2 /ft
2.42
Prestress eccentricity: e = 6.63 in
12 222
= 968 in3
6
Check the bottom fiber stress at transfer:
fb =
Pi Pi e MDC + PT
202.1 202.1 6.63 81.1 12
+
=
+
A
S
S
264
968
968
= 1.14 ksi < 2.7 ksi
OK
Check the bottom fiber stress at final:

fb =
Pf Pf e MSIII 176.5 176.5 6.63 137.6 12

+
=
+
A
S
S
264
968
968
= 0.17 ksi > 0 ksi
OK
Check the top fiber stress at transfer:

ft =
Pi Pi e MDC + PT
202.1 202.1 6.63 81.1 12
+
=
+
A
S
S
264
968
968
= 0.39 ksi > 0 ksi
OK
Check the top fiber compressive stress at final:

For DC + PT + LL + IM,
ft =
Pf Pf e MSI 176.5 176.5 6.63 151.7 12

+
+
=
+
A
S
S
264
968
968
= 1.34 ksi < 3.0 ksi
OK
By inspection, the compressive stresses due to

1
/2 (DC + PT) + LL + IM are less than the allowables.
DC
PT
and
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-124

MDC + PT = 155 + 47.9 = 107.1 kip-ft
Service I Moment: MSI = 155 + 47.9 86.4 = 193.5 kip-ft
Service III Moment: MSIII = 155 + 47.9 + 0.8 ( 86.4) = 176.2 kip-ft

12 (0.217)
= 1.078 in2 /ft
2.42
12 302
= 1800 in3
6
ft =
Pi Pi e MDC + PT
208.6 208.6 9.13 107.1 12
+
=
+
A
S
S
360
1800
1800
= 0.92 ksi < 2.7 ksi
OK
Check the top fiber stress at final:

ft =
Pf Pf e MSIII 182.9 182.9 9.13 176.2 12

+
=
+
A
S
S
360
1800
1800
= 0.26 ksi > 0 ksi
OK

fb =
Pi Pi e MDC + PT
208.6 208.6 8.13 107.1 12
+
=
+
A
S
S
360
1800
1800
= 0.23 ksi > 0 ksi
OK
Check the bottom fiber compressive stress at final:

fb =
Pf Pf e MSI 182.9 182.9 9.13 193.5 12

+
+
=
+
A
S
S
360
1800
1800
= 0.87 ksi < 3.0 ksi
OK

1
DC
PT
and
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-125

MDC + PT = 55 + 47.9 = 102.9 kip-ft
Service I Moment: MSI = 55 + 47.9 + 70.0 = 172.9 kip-ft
Service III Moment: MSIII = 55 + 47.9 + 0.8 (70.0) = 158.9 kip-ft

12 (0.217)
= 1.078 in2 /ft
2.42
12 222
= 968 in3
6
fb =
Pi Pi e MDC + PT
211.1 211.1 6.63 102.9 12
+
=
+
A
S
S
264
968
968
= 0.97 ksi < 2.7 ksi
OK
Check the bottom fiber stress at final:

fb =
Pf Pf e MSIII 185.4 185.4 6.63 158.9 12

+
=
+
A
S
S
264
968
968
OK
= 0.002 ksi > 0 ksi

ft =
Pi Pi e MDC + PT
211.1 211.1 6.63 102.9 12
+
=
+
A
S
S
264
968
968
= 0.63 ksi > 0 ksi
OK
Check the top fiber compressive stress at final:

ft =
Pf Pf e MSI 185.4 185.4 6.63 172.9 12

+
+
=
+
A
S
S
264
968
968
= 1.58 ksi < 3.0 ksi
OK

1
DC
PT
and
OCTOBER 2004
N. TimeDependent Losses
(Refined Method)
[5.9.5.4]
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-126
Use Location 2.5 to calculate losses due to shrinkage, creep and

relaxation because the highest effective prestressing force occurs at this
location. This will result in conservative values for creep and relaxation
losses.
Shrinkage
[5.9.5.4.2]
fpSR = (13.5 0.125 H)

H = relative humidity (use 73%)
fpSR = [13.5 0.125 (73)] = 4.5 ksi
[5.9.5.4.3]
Creep
The moment associated with the wear course and barriers for a 1 foot
wide section of slab is 4 kip-ft.
fpCR = 12.0 fcgp 7.0 fcdp
fcgp = 1.1 ksi
fcdp =
(calculated earlier in Part J)
MDW e 4 (12) 6.63

=
= 0.030 ksi
I
10,650
fpCR = 12.0 (1.1) 7.0 (0.030) = 13.0 ksi
[5.9.5.4.4]
Relaxation
For low-relaxation strands:
0.30 fpR2 = 0.30 [20.0 0.3 fpF 0.4 fpES 0.2 fpSR + fpCR
)]
If the friction losses are such that the tendon stresses after jacking are
above 0.70 fpu , then fpF is assumed equal to zero.
= 0.30 [20.0 0.3 (0) 0.4 (2.0) 0.2 (4.5 + 13.0)]
= 4.7 ksi
Total Losses
Total time-dependent losses = 4.5 + 13.0 + 4.7 = 22.2 ksi
(10.3% of 0.80 fpu )
The computed losses of 10.3% are approximately the same as those

assumed in the stress checks (11%).
If the computed losses are
significantly different from the assumed, designers will need to
recalculate the stresses based on a new assumed loss and iterate until
the computed and assumed losses converge.
OCTOBER 2004
O. Investigate
Strength Limit
State Flexure
[5.7.3.3.2]
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-127
The flexural strength of the slab needs to be sufficient to carry factored

loads associated with the strength limit state and also satisfy the
maximum and minimum reinforcement checks.
Compute the Strength I design moment for a 1 foot wide strip of slab:
Mu = 1.0 [1.25 (62) + 1.00 (19.1) + 1.75 (70.6 )] = 220 kip-ft
Determine the theoretical cracking moment for the cross section ( Mcr ).
To compute the maximum cracking moment, use the prestress force at
transfer (202.1 kips).
Solve for the moment that produces fr at the bottom of the section:
Mcr = (fr + fPTS ) S
[5.4.2.6]
The assumed rupture or cracking stress for concrete is:

fr = 0.24 fc = 0.24 5.0 = 0.537 ksi
The stress due to prestressing (including secondary moments) is:

fPTS =
=
P P e Msec ondary
+
A
S
S
202.1 202.1 6.63 19.1 12
+
= 1.913 ksi
264
968
968
The cracking moment is:

Mcr = 2372 kip-in = 198 kip-ft
1.2 M cr = 238 kip-ft
[5.7.3.2]
[5.7.3.1.1]
Compute the capacity neglecting any benefit from mild steel.

equations for bonded tendons:
k = 0.28 (LRFD Table C5.7.3.1.1-1)
dp = 11.00 + 6.625 = 17.625 in
A ps fpu
c=
0.85 f b + k A fpu
c
1
ps
dp
Use the
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-128
10
.
78
270
= 6.41 in
=
270
0.85 5.0 0.80 12 + 0.28 1.078
17.625
6.41
c
= 270 1 0.28
fps = fpu 1 k
= 242.5 ksi
17
.625
d
a = 1 c = 0.80 6.41 = 5.13 in
The flexural resistance can be computed as:

a
5.13
Mn = A ps fps dp = 1.0 1.078 242.5 17.625
2
2
= 3937 kip-in = 328 kip-ft
which is greater than 1.2 Mcr (238 kip-ft) and Mu (220 kip-ft)
Using the moments given in Table 5.7.3.7:
Mu = 1.0 [1.25 (155) + 1.00 (47.9) + 1.75 (86.4)] = 393 kip-ft
fb = fr =
P P e Msec ondary Mcr

+
+
A
S
S
S
0.537 =
Mcr
208.6 208.6 9.13 47.9 12
+
+
360
1800
1800
1800

1.2 Mcr = 449 kip-ft
[5.7.3.2]

k = 0.28 (LRFD Table C5.7.3.1-1)
dp = 15.00 + 9.13 = 24.13 in
A ps fpu
c=
0.85 f b + k A fpu
c
1
ps
dp
1
.
078
270
= 6.59 in
=
270
0.85 5.0 0.80 12 + 0.28 1.078
24.13
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-129
6.59
c
= 270 1 0.28
fps = fpu 1 k
= 249.4 ksi
24.13
dp
a = 1 c = 0.80 6.59 = 5.27 in

a
5.27
Mn = A ps fps dp = 1.0 1.078 249.4 24.13
2
2
= 5779 kip-in = 482 kip-ft
which is greater than 1.2 Mcr (449 kip-ft) and Mu (393 kip-ft).
Using the moments given in Table 5.7.3.7:
Mu = 1.0 [1.25 (55) + 1.00 (47.9) + 1.75 (70)] = 239 kip-ft
fb = fr =
P P e Msec ondary Mcr

+
+
A
S
S
S
0.537 =
211.1 211.1 6.63 47.9 12 Mcr

+
+
264
968
968
968

1.2 Mcr = 212 kip-ft
[5.7.3.2]

k = 0.28 (LRFD Table C5.7.3.1-1)
dp = 11.00 + 6.625 = 17.625 in
A ps fpu
c=
0.85 f b + k A fpu
c
1
ps
dp
1
.
078
270
= 6.41 in
=
270
0.85 5.0 0.80 12 + 0.28 1.078
17.625
6.41
c
= 270 1 0.28
fps = fpu 1 k
= 242.5 ksi
17
.625
d
a = 1 c = 0.80 6.41 = 5.13 in
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-130

a
5.13
Mn = A ps fps dp = 1.0 1.078 242.5 17.625
2
2
= 3937 kip-in = 328 kip-ft
which is greater than Mu (239 kip-ft) and 1.2 Mcr (212 kip-ft).
Check Principal Stresses
[5.7.3.3.1]

The maximum amount of reinforcement permitted in a section is based
on the ratio of the depth of the section in compression compared to the
depth of the distance to the tension reinforcement from the compression
side of the section. The ratio can be no more than 0.42. When
calculating d, do not include the wearing course.
For Span Point 1.4:

c
6.41
=
= 0.36
d 17.625
OK
For Span Point 2.0:

c
6.59
=
= 0.27
d 24.13
OK
For Span Point 2.5:

c
6.41
=
= 0.36
d 17.625
OK
OCTOBER 2004
P. Shear
[5.13.3.6]
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-131
The shear force components for a typical 1 foot wide strip of slab are
summarized in Table 5.7.3.8.
Table 5.7.3.8
Shear Summary (per foot)
VDC
Span
Point
(kips)
PT Secondary Shear
(kips)
1.0
6.5
1.1
* Truck + Lane
(kips)
* Tandem + Lane
(kips)
Max
Min
Max
Min
0.87
4.9
-0.8
4.3
-0.7
4.7
0.87
4.1
-0.8
3.6
-0.7
1.2
2.8
0.87
3.4
-0.8
3.0
-1.0
1.3
0.9
0.87
2.7
-1.3
2.5
-1.5
1.4
-0.9
0.87
2.0
-2.0
1.9
-2.0
1.5
-2.8
0.87
1.5
-2.6
1.5
-2.5
1.6
-4.6
0.87
1.0
-3.3
1.1
-3.0
1.7
-6.5
0.87
0.6
-4.0
0.7
-3.5
1.8
-8.3
0.87
0.2
-4.7
0.4
-4.0
1.9
-10.4
0.87
0.2
-5.3
0.2
-4.4
2.0
12.4
0.0
6.0
-4.7
4.9
-3.7
2.1
9.6
0.0
5.2
-0.7
4.4
-0.6
2.2
7.1
0.0
4.5
-0.7
3.8
-0.7
2.3
4.7
0.0
3.7
-1.0
3.3
-1.1
2.4
2.4
0.0
2.9
-1.5
2.7
-1.5
2.5
0.0
0.0
2.2
-2.2
2.1
-2.1
* Includes dynamic load allowance.
The LRFD Specifications do not require that a shear check be performed,

however Mn/DOT design practice is to do so.
To minimize the effort associated with the shear check, conservatively
check the largest design shear force on a non-haunch portion of the slab.
If the check is satisfied, all sections of the slab can be considered
adequate.
If the check is not satisfied additional investigation is
necessary.
The Strength I design shear at Span Point 2.0 is:
Vu = 1.25 (12.4) + 1.00 (0.0) + 1.75 (6.0) = 26.0 kips
Investigate LRFD Equation 5.8.3.4.2-2. No axial load is applied. Neglect

any mild flexural reinforcement and any beneficial vertical prestressing
effect. As a starting point, assume is equal to 30 degrees.
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-132
Mu
d + 0.5 Nu + 0.5 Vu Vp cot A ps fpo
x = v
E s A s + Ep A ps
Use the Mu and dv from Span Point 1.4

220 12
+ 0.5 0 + 0.5 26 (cot 30) 1.078 0.7 270
x = 15.84
29,000 0 + 28,500 1.078
= 0.000244
Determine the crack spacing parameter next. Use dv for s x

[Eqn. 5.8.3.4.2-4]
s xe = s x
1.38
1.38
= 15.84
= 10.3
1.5 + 0.63
ag + 0.63
With the strain and crack parameters determined, refer to Table

5.8.3.4.2-2 to determine the appropriate and values for use in
computing the shear capacity of the concrete. Use the values in the cell
for s xe < 15 and x < 0.20 ( = 5.34 and = 29.5 ).
The required nominal shear capacity is:
Vn =
Vu 26.0
=
= 28.9 kips
v
0.9
The shear capacity of the concrete is:

Vc = 0.0316
fc b v dv = 0.0316 5.34
= 0.0316 5.34
Q. Minimum
Longitudinal
Reinforcement
[5.8.3.5]
5.0 12 15.84
5.0 12 15.84 = 71.7 >> 28.9 kips
OCTOBER 2004
R. Distribution
Reinforcement
[5.14.4.1]
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-133
The minimum amount of transverse reinforcement in a horizontal plane

shall be taken as a percentage of the main reinforcement:
100 fpe
50%
L 60
For Spans 1 and 3

100
170.3
= 38%
60
55
Interior Strip: Maximum positive moment

Positive moment prestressing = 1.078 in2 /ft
Transverse reinforcement = 0.38 (1.078) = 0.41 in2 /ft
Use #19 @ 12", A s = 0.44 in2 /ft
S. Shrinkage and
Temperature
Reinforcement
[5.10.8.2]
Using an average thickness of 26 inches, the required temperature steel

is:
Ag
12 26
A s 0.11
= 0.11
= 0.57 in2 /ft each direction, both faces
fy
60
Half should be placed in each face:

1
A s = (0.57) = 0.29 in2 /ft each direction
2
Use #16 @ 12", A s = 0.31 in2 /ft
T. Deformations
[2.5.2.6]
Dead Load Deflection Plus Prestress Camber

The total weight of the superstructure is used for dead load deflections.
The gross moment of inertias are used and a computer analysis is run to
obtain instantaneous deflections. The results of the computer analysis,
(dead load deflections and camber due to prestress) are presented below.
Using the long-term multipliers (from Section 4.6 of the PCI Handbook
with composite topping), the long-term deflections are calculated as:
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
at release
at release
(Spans 1 and 3)
(Span 2)
(in)
(in)
Prestress
+0.92
0.73
WDC
-0.46
-0.50
Total
0.46
0.23
5-134
final
final
(Spans 1 and 3)
(Span 2)
(in)
(in)
2.20
2.02
1.61
2.40
-1.10
-1.20
0.92
0.41
Multiplier
With a net upward deflection in all spans, the slab is cambered

downward. The camber is equal to the camber at release plus 1/2 of the
long-term camber.
Spans 1 and 3:
0.46 +
1
(0.92) = 0.92 in
2
Round down and use 7/8 in
1
(0.41) = 0.43 in
2
Round down and use 3/8 in
Span 2:
0.23 +
Total Camber
[2.5.2.6.2]
Live Load Deflections
Allowable LL + I =
[3.6.1.3.2]
Span
800
55 12
= 0.83 in (Span 1 and 3)
800
70 12
= 1.05 in (Span 2)
800
Two live load cases are evaluated as part of the live load deflection
check. One is the design truck alone. The other is lane load combined
with 25% of the truck load deflection.
A computer analysis (based on gross nonprismatic section properties)
had the following deflections for a full lane of live load:
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-135
Spans 1 and 3:
Truck deflection: 6.24 in/lane
Lane deflection: 2.59 in/lane
Truck check:
= (1 + IM) ( truck ) (distribution factor)
= 1.33 6.24 0.054 = 0.45 < 0.83 in
OK
Lane/truck check:
= 0.25 (1 + IM) ( truck + lane ) (distribution factor)
= 0.25 1.33 (6.24 + 2.59) (0.054) = 0.25 < 0.83 in
OK
Span 2:
Truck deflection: 8.83 in/lane
Lane deflection: 3.60 in/lane
Truck check:
= (1 + IM) ( truck ) (distribution factor)
= 1.33 8.83 0.054 = 0.63 < 1.05 in
Lane/truck check:
= 0.25 (1 + IM) ( truck + lane ) (distribution factor)
= 0.25 1.33 (8.83 + 3.60) (0.054) = 0.35 < 1.05 in
U. Anchorage Zone
[5.10.9]
OK
OK
Anchorages are designed at the strength limit state for the factored
jacking force.
Due to the simplicity of the geometry of the anchorage and the lack of
substantial deviation in the force flow path, the approximate procedure
described in LRFD Article 5.10.9.6 is used.
For a 12- 0.6" diameter strand tendon, use a square anchorage plate
with a side dimension of 12.875 inches (a and b). Assume a duct outer
diameter of 6.25 inches.
[5.10.9.6.2]
General Zone Compressive Stresses

Determine the allowable concrete compressive stress from:
fca =
0.6 Pu K
A b 1 + l c
1
1

t
b eff
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-136
Figure 5.7.3.5
Anchorage Dimensions
Determine the value for K based on the spacing of the tendons and the
size of the anchorage plate.
s = 29 > 2 a = 25.75
Use K = 1
The jacking force is:

Pjack = (jacking stress) (# of strands) A strand
= 216 12 0.217 = 562 kips
[3.4.3.2]
The factored tendon force for anchorage design is:

Pu = 1.2 (562) = 674.4 kips
b eff = 12.875 in
l c = 1.15 b eff = 1.15 (12.875) = 14.81 in
t = 22 in
A b = (a b eff )
fca =
[5.10.9.3.1]
D2
6.252
= (12.875)2
= 135.1 in2
4
4
0.6 674.4 1.0
1
1
135.1 1 + 14.81
12.875 22
= 2.03 ksi
The factored concrete compressive strength for the general zone shall not
.
exceed 0.7 fci
= 0.80 for compression in anchorage zones
= 0.7 (0.8) 4.5 = 2.52 ksi
fca 0.7 fci
Therefore, use fca = 2.03 ksi
Determine the compressive stress at a distance equal to the plates
smaller dimension. Assume the load distributes at an angle of 30.
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN

A e = (a + 2 tan 30 a)2
D2
4
= (12.875 + 2 0.577 12.875)2

fe =
[5.10.9.6.3]
5-137
6.252
= 739 in2
4
Pu
674.4
=
= 0.90 ksi < fca = 2.03 ksi
Ae
739
OK
General Zone Bursting Force

The tendon slope at the ends of the superstructure from Table 5.7.3.5 is
0.050 radians (3 degrees).
The bursting forces in the anchorage is calculated as:

a
Tburst = 0.25 Pu 1 + 0.5 Pu sin

h
12.875
= 0.25 (674.4) 1
+ 0.5 (674.4) 0.052 = 87.5 kips
22
dburst = 0.5 (h 2 e) + 5 e (sin )
(for this example, e = 0)
= 0.5 (22) = 11 in
Using
= 1.00
for
tension
f = 1.0 (60) = 60 ksi :

A s reqd =
in
steel
in
anchorage
zones,
then
87.5
= 1.46 in2 (spaced within 2.5 dburst = 27.5 in )
60
Use 4 - #16 closed stirrups spaced at 6 inches (refer to Figure 5.7.3.6).

A s = 4 (0.31) 2 legs/stirrup = 2.48 > 1.46 in2
Figure 5.7.3.6
Bursting Force Reinforcing
OK
OCTOBER 2004
[5.10.9.3.2]
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-138
General Zone Edge Tension Forces

Edge tension forces are the tensile forces in the anchorage zone acting
close to the transverse edge (spalling forces) and longitudinal edges
(longitudinal edge tension forces). For the case of a concentrically loaded
anchorage zone, the longitudinal edge tension forces are insignificant,
and the magnitude of the design spalling force may be taken as 2% of
the total post-tensioning force.
Spalling Force = 0.02 (674.4) = 13.5 kips

Using fy = 1.0 (60) = 60 ksi :
A s reqd =
13.5
= 0.22 in2
60
Use 2- #16 bars, A s = 0.62 in2
V. Summary of
Final Design
A summary of the primary reinforcement for the slab is provided in Figure

5.7.3.7. A typical transverse half section is illustrated for the midspan
section and for the section over the piers.
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 5.7.3.7
5-139
OCTOBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-140
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
6-1
6. STEEL
STRUCTURES
Structural steel, in the form of rolled steel beams or welded plate girders,
is used for bridge superstructures. In rare instances integral pier caps or
substructures will be designed using steel. This section is intended to
provide general design guidance and information on detailing practices.
In addition, a design example for a two-span plate girder superstructure
is included.
6.1 Materials
Structural Steels
Steel bridges are fabricated and constructed with steel elements that are
produced at two different types of steel mills; shape mills and plate mills.
In addition to different products, the grades of steel available from each
type of mill differ slightly.
Shape mills produce bars, angles, tubes, pipes, channels, W sections
(wide flange), S sections (American Standard), and piling that satisfy a
variety of material specifications. Standard mill lengths available for
these sections range from 30 to 60 feet. With sufficient quantities and
sufficient lead time, longer lengths may be available. AISCs Modern
Steel Construction yearly January issue provides information on different
shapes available domestically from various mills. The designer shall
check the availability of shapes before specifying their use in a structure.
Plate mills produce flat sections that are used to fabricate plate girders,
connections, gusset plates, etc. Plate steel is also produced in a number
of different material specifications. Larger plate mills have a width
limitation of 150 inches. The maximum available plate length varies by
mill and cross-sectional dimensions of the plate.
The LRFD Specifications identify a number of steels that can be
incorporated into bridge structures. They are identified in Tables 6.4.1-1
and 6.4.2-1 of the LRFD Specifications with both AASHTO and ASTM
designations. Weathering steels have a W appended to the grade
designation (e.g. 50W, 70W, 100W). Designers should note that the
AASHTO and ASTM designations are not identical.
The AASHTO Specifications require additional tests (Charpy testing) to
verify the toughness of the material. Mn/DOT Spec 3308 requires this
testing be conducted for steel incorporated into major structural
components. Mn/DOT Spec 2471.2 lists the specification numbers for
standard structural metals used in bridge projects. Structural steel of
primary members shall satisfy the toughness requirements for Zone 3.
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
6-2
Shape sections, other than pipe and tubing, are typically available in 36,
50, or 50W grades. Steel plate is available in 36, 50, and 50W grades.
High Performance Steel (HPS) is available in Grades HPS50W and
HPS70W. The typical steels for Mn/DOT bridge designs are Grade 50W
and HPS70W. Hybrid sections are often the most cost effective. The
bottom flange in positive moment regions and both flanges near piers
would utilize HPS70W, all other steel would be 50W.
Additional information regarding steel shapes and plates may be found in
Properties of Bridge Steels, Vol. I, Chapter 3, Highway Structures
Design Handbook, May 1994.
Bolts, Nuts, and Washers
For most steel bridge applications ASTM A325 high strength bolts per
Mn/DOT 3391.2B should be used. The LRFD specifications also include
ASTM A490 high strength bolts. Due to reduced availability and higher
cost, A490 bolts should not be used without first consulting the Bridge
Design Engineer. A490 bolts cannot be sold with plating, galvanizing, or
mechanical zinc coating, so their use as field bolts is problematic.
For applications where strength is not the primary design consideration,
ASTM A307 bolts per MnDOT Spec 3391.2A may be used. See Mn/DOT
Spec 3391 for additional information on fasteners.
Additional fastener information may be found in Mechanical Fasteners
for Steel Bridges, Vol. I, Chapter 4A, Highway Structures Design
Handbook, April 1996.
Dimensional and weight information for bolts, nuts, and washers is
provided in Appendix Figures 6.1 through 6.5.
Shear Connectors (Stud Welded Fasteners)
The material requirements for shear connectors are listed in Mn/DOT
Spec 3391. They shall satisfy ASTM material requirements, have a yield
strength of 50 ksi, and an ultimate tensile strength of 60 ksi.
Welds
A variety of welding processes and materials are available to fabricators
for different weld types. In most cases, designers need not concern
themselves with the welding process selected by the fabricator.
Typically, only fillet welds and full penetration welds are permitted.
Designs using partial penetration weld details should only be used with
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
6-3
approval from the Fabrication Methods Engineer. Weld designs should be

based on E70 filler material.
With the exception of pile splices, shear connectors, and railroad ballast
plate splices, field welding is not used or permitted.
Additional
information on welding can be obtained from the Structural Metals or
Fabrication Methods Units of the Bridge Office.
Additional references are the ANSI/AASHTO/AWS Bridge Welding Code D1.5, and Welding of Steel Bridges, Vol. I, Chap 15, Highway
Structures Design Handbook.
Appendix Figures 6.6 through 6.8 contain information on the proper
construction of weld symbols and the proper application of the symbols to
different types of details.
Bearings
Steel plates used in the fabrication of bearings shall be Grade 36 or 50W.
Bearings made from castings shall satisfy ASTM A148, GR. 80-40.
6.2 General
Dimensions and
Details
Designers should provide simple details that are easily fabricated and do
not sacrifice the integrity of the bridge. Details that trap water or
produce an environment that is conducive to corrosion should be
avoided. In addition, details with inadequate clearances are difficult to
fabricate and erect.
AISC LRFD 3rd

Edition, Table
7-3a]
The equipment used to weld and bolt steel pieces together requires room
to operate. The AISC Manual of Steel Construction contains tables with
minimum clearances for bolted connections.
Figure 6.2.1 describes
typical minimum clearances that should be provided for welded
components.
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
6-4
Figure 6.2.1
Structural steel plans and details should clearly describe the material to
be used for each structural steel component. Even for projects where
structural steel is paid for on a lump sum basis, informational quantities
should be provided in the plan set to quantify the amounts of different
steels incorporated into the project. This is particularly true for projects
with fracture critical members. Fracture critical members are fabricated
to a higher quality standard to reduce the potential for defects being
incorporated into the work and thus are more expensive. Designers
should not specify members as fracture critical unless necessary and
appropriate.
[2.5.2.6.3]
As a Rule-of-Thumb for the preliminary design of continuous structures,

try a steel section depth of 0.033L. In no case should the steel section
be less than 0.0285L. Typically a member taller than the minimum will
be the most efficient. The most efficient depth of girder will vary with
span and girder spacing. For large structures a web depth study should
be performed to arrive at the optimal girder height.
Plans should also show the type of weld to be used for each splice and
connection. The welding code (AWS-D1.5) specifies the minimum size of
fillet welds. In most cases, the minimum fillet weld size will have
adequate capacity for the application and no size needs to be provided
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
6-5
within the details. However, if the minimum weld size does not have
adequate capacity, the size of the weld should be identified in the details.
Welding is used in many locations during the fabrication of plate girders.
It is used to connect:
Web plates to flange plates
stiffeners and connection plates to web plates
stiffeners and connection plates to compression flanges and tab
plates
Figure 6.2.2 identifies the locations of these welds and the appropriate
fatigue category to be used for checking live load stress ranges.
Figure 6.2.2
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
6-6
Locate field splices at or near points of dead load contraflexure. Identify

Area A on the beam or girder plan sheets. Area A is the portion of
top flange that is in tension due to total dead load. Identifying the
tension flange is important for a number of reasons:
A bolted tab plate connection must be used to connect stiffeners
or connection plates to tension flanges. A fillet weld is normally
used for the connection to the compression flange. See Details
B402 (bolted diaphragms), B407 (cross frame diaphragms), B408
(cross frame diaphragms for curved bridge), and B410 (bolted
stiffener to flange connection).
During construction, the contractor may request that an item
(e.g., formwork, screed machine support) be attached to a girder.
Welding to the tension flange of primary members is not
permitted.
The LRFD Specifications do not explicitly give a maximum diaphragm
spacing as was previously given in the Standard Specifications. The
spacing of diaphragms used for bracing is used to determine allowable
compressive stresses.
In general the diaphragm spacing in the positive moment area should be
based on the maximum allowed for the bracing of the top compression
flange during the construction of the deck; typically 25 to 30 feet. In the
negative moment area, the allowable stress in the bottom compression
flange is based on the diaphragm spacing. The spacing in negative
moment regions is usually 15 to 20 feet.
All connection details for lateral wind bracing systems shall be bolted.
[C6.10.3.2.1]
Limit the segment length to top flange width ratio to 85 for stability
during shipping and erection.
Structural steel is to be protected by painting in the seven county metro
area and all grade separation structures over public roads on the trunk
highway system. All other steel bridges will be reviewed during the
preliminary design process to identify those that should be painted.
Preferred practice is to have the primer applied in the fabrication shop
and the intermediate and top or finish coat applied in the field.
For box pier caps and tub girders access holes and manholes through
diaphragms should be as large as possible and located for ease of
passage. The minimum opening is 2-0 x 2-6. Provide an access door
near each end of box piers for inspection purposes. Locate the door for
ladder access off the roadway, if possible, and hinge the door to swing
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
6-7
away from traffic. Access doors should be placed in the side of the box
where protected from runoff by the superstructure and in the bottom of
the box where exposed. Use Detail B942 for door. Door frames should
be bolted to box.
Where single conduits pass through steel diaphragms and require a
passage hole with a diameter greater than three inches, the opening
should be reinforced with a section of pipe or curved steel plate.
The framing plan for a steel superstructure should identify the following
items:
beam spacing
distance between diaphragms along each beam
type of diaphragms used in different locations
centerline of bearing at piers and abutments
working line and working points
beam marks (B1, B2, etc.)
type and location of bearings
optionally, the location of intermediate stiffeners can be presented
without dimensions.
The plate girder details should identify plate sizes, length of plate
segments, location of Area A, spacing of shear studs, sole plate size,
bearing and intermediate stiffener size, connection plate size, splice
location and type, a table showing top of field splice elevations, and all
pertinent notes. Standard notes are contained in an appendix to Section
2 (Appendix 2-H).
6.3 General
Design Philosophy
In general, structural steel superstructures are shallower and lighter than

concrete superstructures.
In addition to long span and specialty
structures, steel superstructures should be considered where foundations
are expensive or where a change in superstructure height has significant
cost implications on the approaches.
Girders should be designed to be composite with the concrete deck
throughout the entire girder length. Provide shear connectors, in the
form of shear studs, in both positive and negative moment areas and
over field splices.
Stools are used with steel superstructures to provide a construction
tolerance for the profile of the deck. The stool should have vertical edges
that are flush with the edges of the top flange. For plate girders the stool
is defined as the distance between the bottom of the deck and the top of
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
6-8
the web. For rolled beams the stool height is defined as the distance
between the bottom of the deck and the top of the top flange. The
minimum height or thickness for the concrete portion of the stool is 1
inches. The minimum should be provided at the edge of the flange
taking into account the cross slope of the deck. At field splices check
that the top plates do not penetrate the bottom of the deck. Figure 6.3.1
illustrates the definition of stool heights for rolled beams and plate
girders.
Figure 6.3.1
Structural steel quantities are computed by finding the weight of steel
beams or girders, diaphragms, cross frames, and all other plates (e.g.,
sole and gusset plates). When computing structural steel quantities
designers should increase the calculated weight by 1% to account for
the weight of steel for welds, and bolt stick-through.
Provide adequate spacing between butt and field splices and stiffener
connections. Typically 2-0 will provide adequate clearance.
During design, it may be assumed that the dead load of the steel beam
or girder is 15% larger than that computed using only the flanges and
web.
This is a reasonable estimate for the weight of stiffeners,
diaphragms or cross frames and connections.
When sizing stiffeners and connection plates, use a limited number of
thicknesses. To permit two lines of bolts, connection plates must be a
minimum of x 7.
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
6-9
Railroad bridges designed in accordance with the AREMA Specifications

may have slightly different criteria for high strength bolts, pin bolts, and
welding. Check with the railroad in question for specific criteria.
Provide bent plate diaphragms (detail B402) for the following cases:
rolled beam superstructures
plate girders with depths less than 40 inches
beam depth to lateral spacing ratio less than 0.40
In other cases cross-frame diaphragms (Detail B407) should be used.
6.3.1 Shear
Connectors
[6.10.7.4.1]
Provide 7/8 diameter stud connectors that extend above the bottom mat
of deck reinforcement. Studs must be applied in the field after girder
erection.
6.3.2 Fatigue
Fatigue cracks are generally classified as either load induced or

displacement induced. Load and stress limits are placed on members to
minimize load induced fatigue cracks from forming. Proper detailing
practices are used to prevent displacement induced fatigue cracks.
Designers should check connections for fatigue resistance.
For all Trunk Highway bridges, check details for an infinite fatigue life
level regardless of ADT level.
[6.10.8.1.1]
Detailing practices that prevent displacement induced fatigue cracks from

forming include coping stiffeners and terminating welds slightly before
reaching the end of an element. Top and bottom transverse stiffeners
are typically coped 1 inches from face of web and 2 inches from face
of flange (See Detail B411.).
6.3.3 Deflections
To ensure that bridges are constructed with a proper vertical profile, the
deflections associated with selfweight, deck placement, and composite
superstructure dead loads should be presented in the plan set. The dead
load deflection should be split into two categories: selfweight (including
diaphragms) and dead load due to deck and all superimposed loads
(excluding FWS). These deflections should be displayed in feet with a
precision of three decimal places.
Live load deflection shall be limited to L/800 for typical bridges and
L/1000 for bridges carrying pedestrians.
Calculate the live load
distribution for deflection by taking the number of lanes times the
multiple presence factor and divide by the number of beams. The
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
6-10
multiple presence factor used with this calculation should not be less than
0.85.
6.3.4 Camber
For most steel bridges camber will be fabricated into the beam to offset
the deflections due to applied dead loads. The cambered member is
fabricated with a profile opposite of that caused by dead load deflection.
For rolled beams introducing camber can be a relatively expensive
operation. It is usually accomplished with cold bending and/or with heat
straightening techniques. Rolled beams for bridges should be cambered
if the dead load deflection exceeds the maximum mill tolerance for
camber as stated in ASTM A6. If the deflection is less, state that the
beam should be placed natural camber up.
Plate girders shall always be cambered. This is accomplished without
mechanical means or heat straightening techniques. Vertical cambers
are introduced by cutting the web plates with the desired profile.
Horizontal curvature is introduced by cutting flange plates with the
proper horizontal shape. During fabrication, the web and flanges are
attached to each other to produce a member with the proper geometric
characteristics.
Girders should be cambered for anticipated dead load deflections, vertical
curve, and residual camber. Do not include the deflection due to future
wearing surface (FWS). Residual camber should be provided to eliminate
the appearance of a sag in a span. Only provide residual camber on
girders with straight grades and lengths in excess of 75 feet. Use
approximately 1 inches of residual camber for a 100 foot span.
Increase or decrease the residual camber by 1/8 inch for each 10 foot
change in span length. Use a maximum residual camber of 2 inches.
Reduce the residual camber by the amount that is required for crest
vertical curvature.
The stool height for girders should be constant throughout the length of
the girder for girders without residual camber. For girders where residual
camber needs to be used, the stool height will vary. For these situations,
the stool height will have its largest value at substructure locations and
smaller values near midspan. In no case can the thickness of concrete in
the stool be less than 1 inches.
Camber information should be included in the plans and presented in
fractions of an inch (1/8 inch precision). Use a table and schematic detail
to convey the information.
Within the schematic detail, label the
horizontal reference line, chord lines connecting field piece ends, and the
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
6-11
camber curve. Provide tabularized information at field splices, support

points, and at intermediate points along the length of field pieces. Each
field piece should be defined by at least five points that are uniformly
spaced at intervals less than or equal to 25 feet. Define points of
maximum camber. Figure 6.3.4.1 contains a sample camber diagram
and table.
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 6.3.4.1, Sample Camber Diagram and Table
6-12
JULY 2003
6.4 Rolled Beams
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
6-13
Rolled beams may be difficult to obtain in lengths over 90 feet. Check

with the Fabrication Methods Unit prior to incorporating beams with
lengths over 90 feet into a design.
Bridges that use rolled beams should use sections with a flange width of
at least 14 inches. This will allow 4 lines of bolts to be used in the design
of field splices.
6.5 Plate Girders
Select plate thicknesses in 1/16 inch increments for thicknesses up to 1

inch. For thicknesses between 1 and 3 inches use 1/8 inch increments.
For thicknesses between 3 and 4 inches use 1/4 inch increments.
In general, additional web thickness increases shear capacity.
An
increase in web height or flange area increases moment capacity and
reduces live load deflections.
In general, follow these guidelines in plate size selection for plate girders:
Flanges
For plate girder flanges, the minimum size is x 14. The 14-inch
flange permits 4 lines of bolts for field splices.
The width of the flange should not change at a butt splice. The change in
flange area at butt weld splices should not exceed 100%. In general it is
economical to provide a butt splice if 800 lbs. or more of steel can be
saved.
In negative moment areas, select equal top and bottom plate sizes.
Where practical, the bottom flange should be kept a constant width over
the entire girder length. Top flanges should be kept a constant width
within each field piece. If changing the top flange width at a field splice,
do not taper the flange width. Where flanges need to be tapered in width
use a 24-inch radius for the taper detail. When changing the flange
width and thickness at a butt splice, first taper the width and then taper
the thickness.
[6.13.6.1.5]
When thick fill plates are required, additional rows of bolts will be
required to transfer the force to the member.
Web
For web plates the minimum thickness is inch. The inch web reduces
the potential for warping during fabrication. Select maximum web height
while still meeting clearance requirements.
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
6-14
For continuous structures the web should be sized to be 1/16 th of an inch

thinner than a web which requires no stiffeners for shear. To eliminate
the need for thin filler plates in web field splices, constant thickness web
designs should be used.
Longitudinal stiffeners should only be considered for girders over 84
inches deep. The stiffeners should be terminated at a low stress point
with a fatigue resistant detail. Generally, longitudinal stiffeners should be
continuous through transverse and bearing stiffeners.
6.5.1 High
Performance Steel
Girders
Girders using High Performance Steel (HPS) (Fy = 70 ksi), can be an

economical alternate to girders using 50 ksi steel. Typically, a hybrid
design that utilizes HPS steel for the bottom flange in positive moment
areas and both flanges in negative moment areas is most economical.
6.6 Curved Girders
The LRFD Specifications do not cover the design of curved bridges.

Curved bridges should be designed in accordance with the 2003 AASHTO
Guide Specification for Horizontally Curved Steel Bridges.
Curved plate girder bridges usually have wider flanges and radial lines of
diaphragms. Generally, the radial lines of diaphragms extend across the
entire width of bridge. Occasionally, diaphragms may need to be
discontinued near the obtuse corner of skewed substructures.
For preliminary sizing and spacing of girders use a straight line girder
analysis and limit the maximum bending stress to 0.85 Fy. Using this
spacing, develop your framing plan, including location of all diaphragms.
Review the framing plan with the Design Unit Leader and the Bridge
Design Engineer before proceeding with analysis.
Hybrid girders are not allowed on curved structures.
Theoretically, flange and web sizes could be different for each girder.
The designer must consider economic benefits associated with grouping
plate sizes where applicable.
Diaphragms are considered primary structural members in curved
bridges. They are to be designed for the required forces and moments
determined by analysis. Intermediate diaphragms may be either cross
frame or bent plate type (Detail B408 or B402). The diaphragm to
stiffener to beam connections may be designed for the applied loads, not
the capacity of the member. Assume details for diaphragms are fatigue
Category B.
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
6-15
For shipping purposes, the length between field splices should be limited
to 100 feet when the offset from the chord connecting the ends is
between 3 and 6 feet. A shipping length of 145 feet can be used when
the offset is less than 3 feet. Check with the Fabrication Methods
Engineer for specific situations.
For unusual circumstances, consider requiring the contractor to use
erection shoring. Prior to using this design assumption, discuss the
project with the Bridge Design Engineer and the Regional Bridge
Construction Engineer.
6.7 Box or Tub

Girders
Box or tub girders are rarely used in Minnesota. They typically are
trapezoidal in shape. Usually they have two top flanges, two webs, and a
single, wide bottom flange. The top flanges have shear connectors
attached to them that are used to develop composite action with a castin-place deck. Once the deck is in place the closed shape of the cross
section is effective in carrying torsional loads in addition to flexural loads.
Ensure that the structure has adequate capacity prior to the development
of composite action with the deck. The lateral bracing system for the top
flanges must be considered during construction.
6.8 Bolted
Connections and
Splices
Bolted connections are used to attach different member segments

together at field splices. Welded shop splices are used to vary the
properties of a girder or to construct a field piece with a length greater
than that available with standard mill plate.
All connection details for lateral bracing systems, including gusset plate
connections to the web, should be bolted. Details should be checked to
ensure that there are no bolting access or assembly problems, including
fixed bearing anchor rods.
Most structural connections or splices should be detailed with 7/8 inch
diameter A325 bolts. The standard bolt pattern is a 3-inch grid with 1
1
/2 inch edge distances.
The detailed drawings should include the
standard plan note concerning field splice elevations.
The change in flange area at bolted splices should not exceed 100%. The
splice plates should be of the same steel as the elements being
connected. The minimum thickness of splice plates is 5/16 inches.
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
6-16
Bolted field splices should be designed as slip-critical connections.

Assume that the threads are included in the shear plane and that a Class
B surface coating or condition is available for slip resistance (Slip
Coefficient 0.50).
6.9 Two-Span
Plate Girder
Design Example
This example illustrates the design of a two-span welded plate girder

bridge with a 20 degree skew and is on a constant grade of 1.5%. The
304-0 long bridge has two equal spans of 152-0. Mn/DOT standard
details and drawings for diaphragms (B402 and B407) and railings (Fig.
5-397.117) should be referenced when reviewing this example.
Specifically, this example illustrates the detail design of a typical interior
girder at the critical sections in flexure (positive and negative) and shear
for AASHTO HL-93 loading. Design of the stiffeners, end diaphragm,
shear connectors, and field splice is included. Fatigue is also checked at
critical locations.
The superstructure consists of five girders spaced at 11-4 centers.
Girders are designed to act compositely with a 9 inch deck. A 1/2 inch
of wear is assumed and a deck thickness of 9 inches is used for
composite section properties. To simplify dead load computation the
wearing course is assumed to extend from outside of barrier to outside of
barrier.
The top flange thickness usually varies along the length of the girder. As
the top flange thickness varies along the girder line, the thickness of
concrete in the stool changes as well. For dead load purposes the
concrete portion of the stool is assumed to have a uniform thickness of
33/8 inches. This is arrived at by subtracting the thinnest top flange from
the thickest top flange and adding 1 inches. For section property
computations, a concrete stool thickness of 1 inches will be used. The
composite deck is assumed to have a unit weight of 0.150 kcf for dead
load computations and 0.145 kcf for elastic modulus computations.
A.1 Materials
The following material and geometric parameters are used in this

example:
Concrete (deck and overlay)
Dead load unit weight = wc = 0.150 kcf
Compressive strength = fc = 4 ksi
Elastic modulus = Ec = 3644 ksi
Steel
Dead load unit weight = wst = 0.490 kcf
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
6-17
Yield strength = Fy = 50 ksi

Tensile strength = Fu = 70 ksi
Elastic modulus = Es = 29,000 ksi
[6.10.3.1.1b]
Composite Section Properties

Short-term modular ratio = n = 8
Long-term modular ratio = 3n = 24
The geometry for the example is presented in Figures 6.9.1 through
6.9.4. Overall geometry (Figures 6.9.1 and 6.9.2) is presented in this
section. Girder geometry (Figures 6.9.3 and 6.9.4) is presented in the
next section where section properties are assembled.
A typical section for the bridge is shown in Figure 6.9.1. The deck is
supported on five lines of girders. The girders are spaced on 11-4
centers and the roadway is 48-0 wide (two 12-0 traffic lanes and two
12'-0" shoulders.) A Type F railing is provided on each side of the
bridge.
The framing of the superstructure is presented in Figure 6.9.2. The
structure has a 20 degree skew. Due to the span arrangement (2-span,
152-0/152-0), only a half-framing plan is provided. Rolled beam enddiaphragms are located at the abutments. Cross-frame diaphragms are
located at other locations.
Figure 6.9.1
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 6.9.2
6-18
JULY 2003
A.2 Determine
Cross-Section
Properties
[2.5.2.6.3]
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
6-19
The minimum depth of the steel girder is prescribed in LRFD Table

2.5.2.6.3-1
Traditional
Minimum
Depth
of
Constant
Depth
Superstructures.
For continuous span, steel I-beam structures the
depth of the I-beam or girder can be no less than 0.027 L. Mn/DOT uses
a preliminary depth of 0.033L.
Substituting 152 feet for L in the minimum depth ratios results in a
minimum girder height of 49 inches (LRFD) to 61 inches (Mn/DOT).
A member deeper than the minimum is usually the most economical.
Adequate clearance is assumed available for the example and a slightly
deeper section will be tried. Try a design with a 66 inch deep web.
Preliminary web and flange plate sizes for the girder are shown in Figure
6.9.3. The girder is symmetric about the pier with a 7/8 x 18 top
flange and a 7/8 x 20 bottom flange in the positive moment region. In
the negative moment region, both flanges are 13/8 x 20 near the field
splice and 23/4 x 20 over the pier. For the web, a 5/8 inch plate
thickness is used throughout.
The non-composite section properties of the girder are provided in Table
6.9.1.
Table 6.9.1 Non-Composite Section Properties
Parameter
Positive Section
*Negative
Section 1
**Negative
Section 2
d (in)
67.75
68.75
71.50
A (in2)
74.50
96.25
151.25
I (in4)
52,106
77,399
145,024
yt (in)
34.66
34.38
35.75
yb (in)
33.09
34.38
35.75
St (in3)
1503
2252
4057
Sb (in3)
1575
2252
4057
* Negative Section 1 is from the field splice to the shop splice.

** Negative Section 2 is the section over the pier.
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
6-20
Preliminary Beam Layout
JULY 2003
Figure 6.9.3
JULY 2003
[4.6.2.6]
[6.10.3.1.1b]
[6.10.3.1.1c]
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
6-21
Positive Moment Section Properties

The width of deck assumed to act compositely with the girder and resist
external loads is the smallest of three values: 1) of the effective span
length, 2) 12 times the deck thickness plus of the top flange width, or
3) the average spacing of adjacent beams.
For section property
computations the deck thickness is reduced by inch to account for
wear.
152 12
1)
0.7
= 319 in
4
1
1
18 = 117 in
2
2)
12 9 +
3)
11-4 = 136 in
For this example, the controlling value is 117 inches. Using the modular
ratios provided earlier (n=8, 3n=24) results in a transformed deck width
of 14.63 inches for transient, short-term loads (n=8) and 4.88 inches for
permanent, long-term loads (n=24). The concrete stool or haunch has
an assumed thickness of 1 inches for section property computations.
Section B of Figure 6.9.4 contains a girder cross section with the primary
dimensions for section property computations identified.
Negative Moment Section Properties
For negative moment regions, the section assumed effective in resisting
external loads is the steel girder section plus the reinforcement within an
effective width of the slab.
[6.10.3.7]
In negative moment regions, the longitudinal reinforcing steel in the deck

is approximately 1% of the area of the deck. Two thirds of this steel is to
be placed in the top mat of reinforcement. After referring to standard
Mn/DOT deck reinforcing details, a top mat with 20-#19 bars and a
bottom mat with 14-#16 bars is found to be satisfactory.
The top mat is located 3.63 inches from the top of the deck (based on 3
inches clear) and the bottom mat is located 1.94 inches from the bottom
(based on 1 inch clear). See Section C, Figure 6.9.4.
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
6-22
Figure 6.9.4
Table 6.9.2 contains composite girder section properties.

Table 6.9.2 Composite Section Properties
Parameter
Positive Section
N
3N
Positive
Section
for
Negative
Moment*
Negative
Section
1**
Negative
Section 2
****
Ac
(in2)
209.50
119.50
87.6
109.39
164.38
Ic
(in4)
131,943
98,515
70,371
96,048
165,867
Ycg (in)
19.04
29.90
39.10
40.06
42.93
Ytbeam
(in)
8.54
19.40
29.56
32.43
Ybbeam
(in)
59.21
48.35
39.19
39.07
Stbeam
(in3)
15,443
5079
3250
5114
Sbbeam
(in3)
2229
2037
2451
4246
28.60
39.15
2460
1798
* Positive Section for Negative Moment is used for splice design.

** Negative Section 1 is from the field splice to the flange butt splice.
*** Negative Section 2 is the section over the pier.
JULY 2003
B. Select Load
Modifiers
[1.3.3-1.3.5]
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
6-23
The following load multipliers will be used for this example.

D = 1.00
R = 1.00
I = 1.00
C. Select
Applicable Load
Combinations and
Load Factors
[3.4.1]
The load combinations which

example are identified below:
will
be
considered
for
the
design
STRENGTH I - Standard HL-93 loading will be used. Primary applications

include:
maximum bottom flange stress in positive moment location
maximum top and bottom flange stress in negative moment
locations
Mu = 1.25 DC + 1.75 LL
SERVICE II - Corresponds to the overload provisions in the AASHTO
Standard Specifications pertaining to yield control and to slip-critical
connections.
Mu = 1.0 (DC) + 1.3 LL
FATIGUE - .Checks to limit the potential for fatigue cracks to form in a
structure.
Mu = 0.75 LLrange
[3.4.2]
CONSTRUCTION LOAD COMBINATION

During erection, the girder will need to resist stresses associated with the
steel section alone. In addition, the need for diaphragms or cross-frames
will be determined at this stage.
Mu = 1.25 DCtemp + 1.5 LLtemp
Due to the continuous configuration, maximum and minimum ( p ) load
factor values will be used.
D. Calculate Live
Load Force Effects
[3.6.1] [3.6.2]
[4.6.2.2]
Assume that traffic can be positioned anywhere between the F rail

barriers.
48
Number of design lanes =
= 4 lanes
12
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
6-24
Dynamic Load
Allowance
IM = 15% when evaluating fatigue and fracture

IM = 33% when evaluating all other limit states
Distribution
Factors for
Moments
[4.6.2.2.2b]
a. Interior Beams with Concrete Decks

LRFD Table 4.6.2.2.1-1 lists common deck superstructure types that have
approximate live load distribution equations.
[C4.6.2.2.1-1]
A Type (a) superstructure describes the structural system used in this

example (cast-in-place concrete deck on steel beam supporting
components). Per LRFD Table 4.6.2.2.2b-1, the approximate distribution
equations can be used if a number of geometric parameters are within
the range of values used to arrive at the approximate equations. For a
Type (a) superstructure, the geometric constraints are:
Type (a) Cross Section Range of Applicability Limits for Flexure
[4.6.2.2.1]
Parameter
Design Example
Minimum
Maximum
Beam Spacing
(S)
11.33
3.5
16.0
Slab Thickness
(ts)
9.0
4.5
12
Number of
Beams (Nb)
Span Length (L)
152
20
240
In addition to S, ts, and L, the distribution equations for live load moment
area also based on Kg. Kg is a longitudinal stiffness parameter defined in
LRFD Equation 4.6.2.2.1-1.
K g = n (I + A e g2 )
where n is the modular ratio, I is the noncomposite girder moment of

inertia, A is the noncomposite area of the girder and eg is the distance
between the centers of gravity of the noncomposite girder and the deck.
a.1 Positive Moment Region
For the positive moment region
I = 52,106 in4
A = 74.50 in2
ts = 9.0 in
yt = 34.66 in
t
9.0
e g = concrete stool + s + y t = 1.50 +
+ 34.66 = 40.66 in
2
2
K g = 8 (52,106 + 74.50 40.66 2 ) = 1.402 x 106 in4
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
6-25

Distribution factor for moment
[Table
4.6.2.2.2b-1]
S
gM = 0.06 +
14
0.4
S

L
11.33
= 0.06 +
14
0.4
0.3
Kg
3
12 L (t )
s
11.33
152
0.1
0.3
6
1.402x10
12 152 (9)3
0.1
= 0.484 lanes/girder
[3.6.1.1.2]
[3.6.1.4]
Fatigue
The design fatigue truck is a single lane vehicle, that does not include the
multiple presence factor. The tabulated approximate distribution factor
equations for moment include the multiple presence factors.
Consequently, when a designer is considering fatigue, the distribution
factor determined with the approximate equation for a single lane should
be divided by 1.20.
Distribution factor for fatigue moments
0.484
gM f =
1.2
Two or more design lanes loaded
[Table
4.6.2.2.2b-1]
S
gM = 0.075 +
9.5
0.6
11.33
= 0.075 +
9.5
S

L
0.6
0.2
Kg
12 L (t )3
s
11.33
152
0.1
0.2
6
1.402x10
12 152 (9)3
0.1
a.2 Negative Moment Region
The noncomposite section properties vary along the girder. The differing
I, A, and yt values impact the Kg term.
For the negative moment section over the pier
I = 145,024 in4
A = 151.25 in2
ts = 9.0 in
yt = 35.75 in
e g = concrete stool +
ts
9.0
+ y t = 1.50 +
+ 35.75 = 41.75 in
2
2
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
6-26
K g = 8 (145,024 + 151.25 41.752 ) = 3.269 x 106 in4
One design lane loaded

[Table
4.6.2.2.2b-1]
S
gM = 0.06 +
14
0.4
S

L
11.33
= 0.06 +
14
0.4
0.3
Kg
12 L (t )3
s
11.33
152
0.1
0.3
6
3.269x10
12 152 (9)3
0.1
Fatigue
Distribution factor for fatigue moment
0.521
gMf =
1.2
[Table
4.6.2.2.2b-1]
S
gM = 0.075 +
9.5
0.6
11.33
= 0.075 +
9.5
S

L
0.6
0.2
12 L (t )3
s
11.33
152
Kg
0.2
0.1
6
3.269x10
12 152 (9)3
0.1
[4.6.2.2.2d]
b. Exterior Beams
Table 4.6.2.2.2d-1 contains the approximate distribution factor equations
for exterior beams.
Check the value of de to ensure that the
approximate distribution equations are valid.
de = distance from centerline of exterior girder to the gutterline
(see Figure 6.9.5)
de = 3.00 1.67 = 1.33 ft
which is greater than -1.0 and less than 5.5. The approximate equation
for two or more design lanes loaded can be used.
One design lane loaded
Use the lever rule and refer to Figure 6.9.5.
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN

Exterior beam reaction or distribution factor is:
0.5 [(11.33 0.67) + (11.33 6.67)]
gM =
1.2
11.33
Fatigue
Distribution factor for fatigue moment
0.811
gMf =
1.2
Figure 6.9.5
6-27
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
6-28

The distribution factor is equal to the factor "e" multiplied by the interior
girder distribution factor for two or more lanes loaded.
[Table
4.6.2.2.2d-1]
gM = e gMint erior
where
e = 0.77 +
de
1.33
= 0.77 +
= 0.916
9.1
9.1
which leads to:

gM = 0.916 0.740 = 0.678 lanes/girder for positive moment
gM = 0.916 0.799 = 0.732 lanes/girder for negative moment
Skewed Bridges
[4.6.2.2.2e]
The framing plan is skewed 20 degrees. There is no modification to the

moments for skew until the skew angle is 30 degrees or greater.
Distribution Factor
for Shear
a. Interior Beams
Similar to flexure, in order to use the simplified distribution equations for
shear, geometric values for the bridge need to be within specific limits.
[Table
4.6.2.2.3a-1]
Type (a) Cross Section Range of Applicability Limits for Shear

Parameter
Design Example
Minimum
Maximum
Beam Spacing (S)
11.33
3.5
16.0
Slab Thickness
(ts)
9.0
4.5
12
Number of Beams
(Nb)
Span Length (L)
152
20
240
Pos. Mom. Long.

Stiffness (Kg)
1.402x106
10,000
7.0x106
Neg. Mom. Long.

Stiffness (Kg)
3.269x106
10,000
7.0x106
[4.6.2.2.3a]
All parameters for the design example are within permissible limits. The
simplified equations for shear distribution can be used (Table 4.6.2.2.3a1 is used).
[Table
4.6.2.2.3a-1]
One Design Lane Loaded

S
11.33
gV = 0.36 +
= 0.36 +
25
25
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
6-29
Two or More Design Lanes Loaded

gV = 0.2 +
[4.6.2.2.3b]
S S
12 35
= 0.2 +
11.33 11.33
-
12
35
b. Exterior Beams
One Design Lane Loaded
Use the lever rule, which results in the same factor that was computed
for flexure.
gV = 0.811 lanes/girder
d
1.33
= 0.733
e = 0.6 + e = 0.6 +
10
10
The exterior shear distribution factor for multiple lanes loaded is the
product of e and the interior girder factor.
gV = e gVint erior = 0.733 1.039 = 0.762 lanes/girder
[4.6.2.2.3c]
[Table
4.6.2.2.3c-1]
c. Skewed Bridges
There is a modification to the shear at the obtuse corners for bridges with
skewed lines of support. This example has a skew angle of 20 degrees.
Type (a) Cross Sections
Range of Applicability Limits for Skew Correction (Shear)
Parameter
Design Example
Minimum
Maximum
Skew Angle ()
20 degrees
0 degrees
60 degrees
Beam Spacing
(S)
11.33
3.5
16.0
Number of
Beams (Nb)
Span Length (L)
152
20
240
0.3
12 L ts3
CF = 1.0 + 0.2
Kg
12 152 93
CF = 1.0 + 0.2
1.402x10 6
tan()
0.3
tan (20)
= 1.07 lanes/girder at the abutment
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN

12 152 93
CF = 1.0 + 0.2
3.269x10 6
6-30
0.3
tan (20)
= 1.06 lanes/girder at the pier

For simplicity, only the larger correction factor will be used to modify the
live load distribution factors for shear. The adjusted shear distribution
factors are:
Interior Girders
One design lane loaded =
0.813 x 1.07 = 0.870 lanes/girder
Two or more design lanes loaded =

1.039 x 1.07 = 1.112 lanes/girder
Exterior Girders
One design lane loaded =
0.811 x 1.07 = 0.868 lanes/girder
Two design lanes loaded

0.762 x 1.07 = 0.815 lanes/girder
Fatigue Shear
Interior Girder =
gVf =
0.870
1.2
Exterior Girder =
gVf =
0.868
1.2
JULY 2003
Summary of
Governing
Distribution
Factors
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN

Table 6.9.3 Distribution Factor Summary (lanes/girder)
One Lane
Multiple
Lane
Control
+ Moment
0.484
0.740
0.740
- Moment
0.521
0.799
0.799
Shear
0.870
1.112
1.112
+ Fatigue
Moment
0.403
0.403
-Fatigue
Moment
0.434
0.434
Fatigue Shear
0.725
0.725
+ Moment
0.811
0.678
0.811
- Moment
0.811
0.732
0.811
Shear
0.868
0.815
0.868
+ Fatigue
Moment
0.676
0.676
-Fatigue
Moment
0.676
0.676
Fatigue Shear
0.723
0.723
Girder/Force Component
Interior
Girder
Exterior
Girder
E. Calculate Force
Effects
6-31
Axial loads generated as a result of creep, shrinkage, and thermal

movements will not be considered for the design of the girders. These
loads are considered in the bearing and substructure design examples.
From this point forward only the design of an interior girder subject to
dead load and HL-93 live loads will be presented.
The unfactored bending moments and shear forces at different locations
along the girder are presented in Tables 6.9.5 through 6.9.12. Moments
and shears due to noncomposite loads (DC1 loads) are applied to a
continuous beam model with varying noncomposite section properties
(see Table 6.9.1). Moments and shears for DC2 loads are based on a
composite continuous beam model consisting of the steel girder plus the
concrete deck where a modular ratio of 3n is used for the section
properties. Moments and shears for live loads are based on a composite
continuous beam model consisting of the steel girder plus the concrete
deck with a modular ratio of n. Table 6.9.4 presents the areas and
moments of inertias for the negative moment regions. The n and 3n
composite section properties for the positive moment regions are
provided in Table 6.9.2.
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
6-32
Table 6.9.4 Properties for DC2 and LL Moment Determination
Parameter
DC2 Negative Section

(3n)
Field Splice
Pier
LL Negative Section (n)

Field Splice
Pier
Ac
(in2)
141.38
196.38
232.75
286.62
Ic
(in4)
127,450
205,514
169,431
259,858
DC1 consists of the following loads: girder selfweight, concrete deck and
form loads. A 15% detail factor (based on the self weight of the girder)
is used to account for the dead load of connection and cross frame
elements. A 0.10 ksf load is considered during construction to account
for the weight of deck formwork.
0.292 k/ft - positive section
A beam
w beam =
0.490 (1.15) = 0.377 k/ft - negative section
144
0.592 k/ft - over pier
deck =
[Area Deck + Area Stool] 0.150
(9.5) 3.375 18
0.15 = 1.41 k/ft

= 11.33
+
12
12 12
forms =
0.010 11.33 = 0.113 k/ft
A 0.20 ksf temporary construction live loading is also considered. It is

assumed to be acting full length on a single span concurrent with wet
concrete placement.
In Table 6.9.6, DCtemp consists of girder
selfweight, form load and one span of concrete
DC2 consists of long-term dead loads, barrier and future wearing surface
(FWS). The load factor for FWS would be 1.5 (DW in Table 3.4.1-1) and
for the barriers would be 1.25 (DC). Mn/DOT uses a FWS of 0.020 ksf
with a 1.25 load factor.
2 barriers
w barrier = 0.438 k/ft
= 0.175 k/ft
5 girders
w fws = 0.020 ksf 11.33 = 0.227 k/ft
The splice plate is located 108 feet from the abutment bearing,
approximately 0.71 of the span. This location was chosen as the nearest
even foot along the span to the dead load inflection point during the
initial sizing. During the design iteration, this dead load inflection point
moved to approximately 0.68 of the span. The splice location for the
example will remain at the assumed location of 0.71 of the span.
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
6-33
All of the DC1 loads presented in the example include the 0.010 ksf load
associated with the formwork. This increases the strength design loads
by 2% but greatly simplifies the calculations. The load is applied to the
noncomposite section but is removed from the composite section. The
actual stresses are also dependent on the pour sequence for the deck.
In the following tables, Girder Point 0.0 is the centerline of bearing at the
abutment. Girder Point 1.0 is centerline of bearing at the pier. Due to
the symmetry of the span arrangement, for most loads only data for
Girder Points 0.0 to 1.0 is provided. However, due to the unsymmetric
loading considered during construction, values are provided for both
spans in Table 6.9.6.
Table 6.9.5 Dead Load Bending Moments (unfactored)
DC1 Moment
Girder
Point
(K-FT)
DC2 Moment
(K-FT)
Girder
Slab
and
Stool
Forms
TOTAL
Barrier
FWS
TOTAL
0.1
198
954
77
1229
122
158
280
0.2
329
1582
127
2038
204
264
468
0.3
393
1884
151
2428
245
317
562
0.4
390
1860
150
2400
246
318
564
0.5
320
1511
121
1952
206
267
473
0.6
182
836
67
1085
125
163
288
0.7
-23
-165
-13
-201
11
0.71 *
-47
-283
-23
-353
-10
-12
-22
0.8
-303
-1492
-120
-1915
-157
-203
-360
0.882
**
-598
-2823
-227
-3648
-319
-413
-732
0.895**
*
-650
-3054
-245
-3949
-347
-450
-797
0.9
-671
-3144
-253
-4068
-358
-464
-822
1.0
-1159
-5122
-412
-6693
-600
-778
-1378
* Field Splice
** Flange Butt Splice
*** First cross-frame off pier
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
6-34
For this design example, the constructibility checks in LRFD Article

6.10.3.2 use the loads provided in the following table (Table 6.9.6).
Table 6.9.6 Construction Load Bending Moments (unfactored)
DCtemp Moment (K-FT)
Girder
Point
Girder
Slab and
Stool
Forms
Total
LLtemp
Moment
(K-FT)
0.1
198
1210
77
1485
194
0.2
329
2094
127
2550
337
0.3
393
2652
151
3196
426
0.4
390
2885
150
3425
464
0.5
320
2792
121
3233
449
0.6
182
2373
67
2622
381
0.7
-23
1628
-13
1592
262
0.8
-303
557
-120
134
90
0.9
-671
-839
-253
-1763
-135
1.0
-1159
-2561
-412
-4132
-412
1.1
-671
-2305
-253
-3229
-371
1.2
-303
-2049
-120
-2472
-329
1.3
-23
-1793
-13
-1829
-288
1.4
182
-1537
67
-1288
-247
1.5
320
-1281
121
-840
-206
1.6
390
-1024
150
-484
-165
1.7
393
-768
151
-224
-124
1.8
329
-512
127
-56
-82
1.9
198
-256
77
19
-41
The truck train generated the controlling negative bending moment over
the pier. The distance between trucks in the train is variable but can be
no less than 50 feet. The largest moment was obtained when the
distance between the last axle of the first truck and the first axle of the
second truck was 119 feet.
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
6-35
Table 6.9.7 contains positive and negative live load moments due to
truck, lane, and truck train loading.
Table 6.9.8 lists the extreme positive and negative bending moments at
various girder points when the fixed axle fatigue truck is run across the
structural model.
Table 6.9.7 Live Load Design Moments Per Lane (unfactored)
Girder
Point
Truck
Pos
Mom
(KFT)
Lane
Pos
Mom
(KFT)
Truck
Neg
Mom
(KFT)
Lane
Neg
Mom
(KFT)
0.1
867
558
-124
-109
Truck
Train
(KFT)
Positive*
Mom
(K-FT)
Negative**
Mom
(K-FT)
1711
-274
0.2
1457
967
-246
-218
2905
-545
0.3
1796
1228
-369
-326
3617
-817
0.4
1923
1340
-492
-435
3898
-1089
0.5
1863
1305
-615
-543
3783
-1361
0.6
1642
1123
-738
-652
3307
-1634
0.7
1278
792
-860
-761
-1199
2492
-2120
0.71
1234
749
-873
-772
-1217
2390
-2152
0.8
816
342
-983
-898
-1370
1427
-2448
-1534
638
-2966
0.882
396
111
-1083
1255
0.895
348
87
-1100
1335
-1626
550
-3148
0.9
329
78
-1106
1369
-1664
516
-3224
1.0
-1230
2174
-2459
-4900
*Positive Moment = [1.33 x Truck] + Lane

**Negative Moment = maximum of [1.33 x Truck]+Lane
or 0.9 x ([1.33 x Truck Train]+Lane)
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
6-36
Table 6.9.8 Live Load Fatigue Moments Per Lane (unfactored)

Girder Point
Truck Positive
Moment
(K-FT)
Truck Negative
Moment
(K-FT)
Fatigue Moment
Range
(K-FT)
0.1
788
-119
1043
0.2
1307
-236
1774
0.3
1625
-354
2276
0.4
1715
-472
2515
0.5
1654
-590
2581
0.6
1469
-708
2504
0.7
1126
-826
2245
0.71
1084
-838
2210
0.8
667
-943
1852
0.882
306
-1039
1547
0.895
268
-1055
1521
0.9
253
-1061
1511
1.0
-1180
1357
*Moment Range = 1.15 x [Positive Moment Negative Moment]

Table 6.9.9 presents the unfactored dead load shear forces at different
girder locations for different load components.
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
6-37
Table 6.9.9 Dead Load Shear (unfactored)

DC1 Shear
Girder
Point
(K)
DC2 Shear
(K)
Girder
Deck
and
Stool
Forms
TOTAL
Barrier
FWS
TOTAL
0.0
-15
-73
-6
-94
-9
-12
-21
0.1
-11
-52
-4
-67
-7
-9
-16
0.2
-6
-31
-2
-39
-4
-5
-9
0.3
-2
-9
-1
-12
-1
-2
-3
0.4
12
15
0.5
34
44
0.6
11
55
70
16
0.7
16
77
99
12
21
0.71 *
16
79
101
10
12
22
0.8
21
98
127
12
15
27
0.842*
*
25
110
144
14
17
31
0.895*
**
27
118
10
155
14
19
33
0.9
28
119
10
157
15
19
34
11
189
17
22
39
1.0
37
141
* Field Splice
** First transverse stiffener
*** First cross-frame
Table 6.9.10 contains the dead load reactions at Girder Points 0.0 and
1.0. The reactions at Girder Point 1.0 are larger than the shear at Girder
point 1.0 because the reaction includes the load from both spans.
Table 6.9.10 Dead Load Reactions (unfactored)
Girder Point
DC1 Reaction (KIPS)
DC2 Reaction (KIPS)
0.0
95
22
1.0
378
79
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
6-38
Table 6.9.11 contains the live load shear extremes for various live load
components: truck and lane. Per LRFD Article 3.6.1.3.1, truck train
loading is not to be used for shear.
Table 6.9.11 Live Load Shear Per Lane (unfactored)
Girder
Point
Truck
Positive
Shear
(K)
Lane
Positive
Shear
(K)
Truck
Negative
Shear
(K)
Lane
Negative
Shear
(K)
Positive*
Shear
(K)
Negative*
Shear (K)
0.0
66
42
-8
-7
130
-18
0.1
57
32
-8
-8
108
-19
0.2
48
25
-13
-10
89
-27
0.3
39
18
-22
-13
70
-42
0.4
31
13
-31
-17
54
-58
0.5
24
-39
-23
40
-75
0.6
17
-47
-29
28
-92
0.7
11
-54
-36
18
-108
0.71
10
-55
-37
15
-110
0.8
-60
-45
-125
0.842
-63
-50
-134
0.895
-65
-53
-139
0.9
-65
-54
-140
1.0
-70
-63
-156
* = [1.33 x Truck] + Lane

Table 6.9.12 presents the live load reactions at the abutment (Girder
Point 0.0) and the pier (Girder Point 1.0). Similar to the dead load
reactions presented in Table 6.9.10, at the pier one can not simply take
the shear values to arrive at the reactions. The adjacent span influences
the magnitude of the reaction. Per LRFD Article 3.6.1.3.1 the truck train
loading needs to be considered for reactions at interior supports.
Table 6.9.12 Live Load Reactions (unfactored)
Girder Point
HL-93 Truck + Lane

Reaction
(KIPS)
HL-93 Truck Train + Lane

Reaction
(KIPS)
0.0
130
1.0
221
273
The checks in this example begin with the strength checks on the
preliminary layout. Designers should be aware that deflections may
control the design. The deflection checks for this example are presented
in Section M.
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
6-39
F. I-Sections in
Flexure
Investigate The
Strength Limit
State
At the strength limit state the girder is designed to carry factored dead
and live loads. The resisting section in the positive moment regions is the
composite section.
In the negative moment regions, resistance is
provided by the girder plus deck reinforcement composite section.
G.1 Determine
Maximum Design
Moments
a. Maximum Positive Design Moment

At 0.4 (60.8) from each end, the maximum design positive flexure is:
Mu = 1.25(2400+564) + 1.75(3898) 0.740
= 3705 + 5048 = 8753 kip-ft
b. Maximum Negative Design Moment
At the pier, the maximum design negative flexure is:
Mu = 1.25(-6693-1378) + 1.75(-4900)0.799
= -10,089 6851 = -16,940 kip-ft
G.2 Code Checks
a. General Proportions
To ensure that the section functions as an I section, the LRFD
specifications contain requirements on the proportions of the web,
flanges, and overall cross section.
The general proportions check is the following:
Iyc
0.1
0.9
Iy
where Iyc is the moment of inertia of the compression flange about a
vertical axis, and Iy is the moment of inertia of the girder about a vertical
axis.
[6.10.2.1]
For the typical positive moment section this becomes:

1
I yc =
0.875 183 = 425.3 in4
12
Iy =
Iyc
Iy
1
1
1
0.875 183 +
66 0.6253 +
0.875 20 = 1009.9 in4
12
12
12
=
425.3
= 0.42 OK
1009.9
For the negative moment section over the pier this becomes:
1
I yc =
2.75 203 = 1833.3 in4
12
Iy =
1
1
1
2.75 203 +
66 0.6253 +
2.75 203 = 3668 in4
12
12
12
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN

I yc
Iy
6-40
1833.3
= 0.50 OK
3668
b. Web Slenderness
To ensure that lateral web deflections are not excessive, the following
check needs to be satisfied for webs without longitudinal stiffeners.
[6.10.2.2]
[C6.10.3.1.4a]
2 Dc
6.77
tw
E
200
fc
where, Dc is the depth of the web in compression in the elastic range, tw

is the thickness of the web, E is the modulus of the web steel and fc is
the stress in the compression flange due to the factored loading under
investigation.
fc
Dc =
d tf
fc + ft
Section properties are from Tables 6.9.1 and 6.9.2, the moments are
from Tables 6.9.5 and 6.9.7 for the 0.4 Girder Point and the LL
Distribution factor is from Table 6.9.3. Start with the sum of the
compression stresses:
1.25 2400 12
= 23.95 ksi
fDC1 =
1503
fDC2 =
1.25 564 12
= 1.67 ksi
5079
fLL + IM =
1.75 3898 0.74 12

= 3.92 ksi
15,443
Combining these terms produces:

fc = fDC1 + fDC2 + fLL + IM = 23.95 + 1.67 + 3.92 = 29.54 ksi
Next compute the sum of the tension flange stresses:
1.25 2400 12
fDC1 =
= 22.86 ksi
1575
fDC2 =
1.25 564 12
= 4.15 ksi
2037
fLL + IM =
1.75 3898 0.74 12

= 27.18 ksi
2229
Combining these terms produces:

ft = fDC1 + fDC2 + fLL + IM = 22.86 + 4.15 + 27.18 = 54.19 ksi
d = 0.875 + 66 + 0.875 = 67.75 in
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
6-41
tf = 0.875 in
Substituting back into the equation produces:
fc
29.54
Dc =
d tf =
67.75 0.875 = 23.02 in
29.54 + 54.19
fc + ft
The upper limit for the check is:
E
29,000
6.77
= 6.77
= 212.1 > 200, Use 200
fc
29.54
The web slenderness check with values inserted becomes:
2 Dc
2 23.02
=
= 73.7 200; OK
tw
0.625
Table 6.9.13A Web Slenderness Check Along the Girder Unfactored
Moments
Girder Point
Moments
DC1 (K-FT)
DC2 (K-FT)
LL+IM (K-FT)
0.1
1229
280
1711
0.2
2038
468
2905
0.3
2428
562
3617
0.4
2400
564
3898
0.5
1952
473
3783
0.6
1085
288
3307
0.7
-201
11
2492
0.8
-1915
-360
-2448
0.9
-4068
-822
-3224
1.0
-6693
-1378
-4900
Table 6.9.13B Web Slenderness Check Along the Girder Section

Properties
Girder
Point
Sc
(in3)
Sc3n
(in3)
Scn
(in3)
St
(in3)
St3n
(in3)
Stn
(in3)
tf (in)
0.1
1503
5079
15,443
1575
2037
2229
0.875
0.2
1503
5079
15,443
1575
2037
2229
0.875
0.3
1503
5079
15,443
1575
2037
2229
0.875
0.4
1503
5079
15,443
1575
2037
2229
0.875
0.5
1503
5079
15,443
1575
2037
2229
0.875
0.6
1503
5079
15,443
1575
2037
2229
0.875
0.7
1503
5079
15,443
1575
2037
2229
0.875
0.8
2252
2451
2451
2252
3250
3250
1.38
0.9
4057
4246
4246
4057
5114
5114
2.75
1.0
4057
4246
4246
4057
5114
5114
2.75
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
6-42
Table 6.9.13C Web Slenderness Check Along the Girder Results
[6.10.2.3]
[6.10.2.3-1]
Girder
Point
Dc
(IN)
2Dc/tw
0.1
23.89
76.46
0.2
23.76
0.3
Limit
Check is
299.4
200.0
OK
76.03
232.2
200.0
OK
23.51
75.24
212.2
200.0
OK
0.4
23.02
73.67
212.1
200.0
OK
0.5
21.98
70.35
232.1
200.0
OK
0.6
19.24
61.58
297.6
200.0
OK
0.7
1.37
4.40
1577.5
200.0
OK
0.8
34.48
110.3
208.8
200.0
OK
0.9
34.62
110.8
208.1
200.0
OK
1.0
34.57
110.6
164.7
164.7
OK
6 .77
fc
c. Flange Proportions
For the compression flange, a check is made to ensure that the web is
adequately restrained by the flange to control web bend buckling. The
width of the compression flange must be equal to at least 30 percent of
the depth of the web in compression.
b f 0.3 D c
where Dc is the same value computed in Table 6.9.13
Table 6.9.14 Compression Flange Proportion Check
Girder Point
Dc (IN)
0.3 x Dc
(IN)
bf (IN)
0.1*
23.89
7.17
18
OK
0.2
23.76
7.13
18
OK
0.3
23.51
7.05
18
OK
0.4
23.02
6.91
18
OK
0.5
21.98
6.60
18
OK
0.6
19.24
5.77
18
OK
0.7
1.37
0.41
18
OK
0.8
34.48
10.34
20
OK
0.9
34.62
10.39
20
OK
1.0**
34.57
10.37
* - controlling case for 18 flange
** - controlling case for 20 flange
20
OK
Check
For the tension flange, a simple check with flange width and flange
thickness is made to ensure that the flange will not distort excessively
during fabrication. The check also provides a measure of safety that the
flange has good proportions in the event of a stress reversal.
JULY 2003
[6.10.2.3-2]
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
6-43
bf
12.0
2 tf
where bf and tf of the tension flange are provided in Figure 6.9.3. Table
6.9.15 contains the results of the check for all of the Girder Points.
Table 6.9.15 Tension Flange Proportion Check
Check
Girder Point
bf (IN)
tf (IN)
bf/2tf
bf
2 tf
G.3 Strength Limit

State Flexural
Resistance
[6.10.4]
12
0.1
20
0.875
11.43
OK
0.2
20
0.875
11.43
OK
0.3
20
0.875
11.43
OK
0.4
20
0.875
11.43
OK
0.5
20
0.875
11.43
OK
0.6
20
0.875
11.43
OK
0.7
20
0.875
11.43
OK
0.8
20
1.375
7.27
OK
0.9
20
2.75
3.64
OK
1.0
20
2.75
3.64
OK
a. Categorization of Flexural Resistance

The procedure for evaluating the flexural strength of a girder in
accordance with the LRFD Specifications is quite involved. To clarify the
steps involved, a flow chart is included in the commentary to LRFD Article
6.10.4. Figure 6.9.6 contains a copy of the flow chart.
The girder cross section has a constant web height. It is considered a
constant depth section. It also utilizes Grade 50 steel, has no holes in
the tension flange, and the web does not contain longitudinal stiffeners.
Consequently we can enter the flow chart at the upper left box.
With the two-span continuous girder, the nominal flexural resistance for
the positive moment section is potentially impacted by the negative
moment section. Thus, determine first the compactness of the negative
section, then check what portion of 6.10.4.2.2 (if any) can be followed.
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 6.9.6
6-44
JULY 2003
[6.10.4.1.2]
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
6-45
b. Negative Moment Section Compact-Section Check

First check the following equation to determine if the web is compact:
2 Dcp
E
3.76
tw
Fy
Figure 6.9.7
Dcp is the depth of the web in compression at the plastic moment.

location of the plastic neutral axis (PNA) can be determined with
equations and figures contained in the Appendix to LRFD Section 6.
figure in the appendix for Negative Bending Sections is provided in
example as Figure 6.9.7.
Pt = Force in the top flange = 50202.75 = 2750 kips
The
the
The
this
Pw = Force in the web = 50660.625 = 2063 kips

Pc = Force in the bottom flange = 50202.75 = 2750 kips
From Figure 6.9.4, Art = 8.84 in2 and Arb = 4.30 in2
Prt = Force in the top mat of rebar = 608.84 = 530.2 kips
Prb = Force in the bottom mat of rebar = 604.30 = 257.7 kips
With the force components known, the location of the plastic neutral axis
can be checked to see if it is located in the web or top flange of the
section. If the combined force in the web and bottom flange is greater
than the sum of the remaining force components the plastic neutral axis
is located in the web.
Pw + Pc = 2063 + 2750 = 4813 kips
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
6-46
Pt + Prb + Prt = 2750 + 257.7 + 530.2 = 3538 kips

The plastic neutral axis is in the web.
[Table A6.1-2]
The location of the plastic neutral axis can be found with the equation in
the appendix for Case I.
D P Pt Prb Prt
+ 1
y = c
2
Pw
66 2750 2750 257.7 530.2
+ 1 = 20.40 in
2
2063
The depth of web in compression is the difference between D and y .

Dcp = D - y = 66.0 20.4 = 45.6 in
Returning to the web slenderness check in Article 6.10.4.1.2.
2 Dcp
2 (45.6)
=
= 145.9
tw
0.625
The maximum value for a compact web with 50 ksi steel is:
E
29,000
3.76
= 3.76
= 90.6 < 145.9
50
Fy
[Equation
6.10.4.1.4-1]
Therefore, the web is not compact.

Consequently, the section is
noncompact. Proceed down in the flow chart to the box with the heading
Article 6.10.4.1.4 and check the slenderness of the compression flange.
bf
12
2 tf
20
= 3.64 12
2 2.75
The compression flange slenderness check is satisfied. Proceed to the

right in the flow chart to the box with the heading Article 6.10.4.1.9 and
determine the required bracing spacing for the bottom flange near the
pier.
[Equation
6.10.4.1.9-1]
L b L p = 1.76 rt
E
Fy
Lb is the length between compression flange brace points. If the flange

is not adequately braced, it may not be able to reach yield stress. rt is
the radius of gyration of the compression flange plus one third of the web
in compression.
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN

Irt =
2.75 203 34.42 0.6253

+
12
12
3
A rt = 20 2.75 +
rt =
6-47
= 1834 in4
34.42
0.625 = 62 in2
3
1834
= 5.43 in
62
Substitute rt into the equation to arrive at the lateral bracing limit for
plastic bending.
Lp = 1.76 5.43
29,000
= 230 in
50
From the framing plan, cross frames are located 16 feet away from the
centerline of the pier.
L b = 16 ft = 192 in
This is less than Lp (230 inches), so adequate bracing is provided to
compute the flexural resistance of the section with the non-lateral
torsional buckling flexural resistance equations. Proceed to the right in
the flow chart to the box with the heading Article 6.10.4.2.4.
[6.10.4.2.4]
c. Negative Region Flexural Strength

Begin by checking the capacity of the compression flange.
Fn = R b R h Fcr
where Rb is the load shedding factor, Rh is the hybrid factor, and the
equation for Fcr is provided in LRFD Article 6.10.4.2.4.
[6.10.4.3.2]
If
2 Dc
E
then Rb is 1.0.
b
tw
fc
If the inequality is not satisfied a more refined equation must be used to

evaluate Rb. Within the inequality, Dc is the depth of the web in
compression in the elastic range and fc is the stress in the compression
flange due to factored loading.
Dc = 34.57 in (from Table 6.9.13C)
D 66
=
= 33 in
2
2
Dc >
D
therefore b = 4.64
2
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
6-48
Now plug values into the inequality. First the left side:
2 Dc
2 34.57
=
= 110.6
tw
0.625
Now compute fc
fc = 48.98
(Table 6.9.13C)
The right side of the inequality becomes

E
29,000
b
= 4.64
= 112.9 > 110.6
fc
48.98
Therefore, Rb = 1.0.
[6.10.4.3.1a]
The cross section uses 50 ksi steel throughout, therefore Rh = 1.0
[6.10.4.2.4a]
Now compute the maximum stress in the compression flange prior to

incorporating the Rb and Rh multipliers.
1.904 E
Fcr =
Fyc
2
b f 2 Dc
tw
2 tf
=
1.904 (29,000)
20
2
(2.75)
= 398.0 ksi which is > 50 ksi, Fcr = 50 ksi
110.1
The maximum stress permitted in the compression flange can now be

computed.
Fn= (1)(1)(50) = 50.0 ksi
The compressive stress in the flange under factored loads has been
computed earlier as fc.
Fu = fc = 48.98 < 50.0 ksi
Therefore, the compression flange is okay.
[6.10.4.2.4b]
Now check the tension flange.
[6.10.4.3.2.b]
The load shedding factor for the tension flange is:

Rb = 1.0
[6.10.4.3.1a]
The cross section uses 50 ksi steel throughout, therefore

Rh = 1.0
[6.10.4.2.4b]
The yield strength of the tension flange is 50 ksi (Fyt)

The maximum stress permitted in the tension flange is
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
6-49
Fn = (1)(1)(50) = 50 ksi
The tension stress in the top flange under factored loads is
1.25 (6693) 1.25 (1378) 1.75 (4900) (0.799)
ft =
+
+
12
3892
5114
5114
= 45.9 ksi
Fu = ft = 45.9
< 50.0 ksi
Therefore, the tension flange is okay.

The negative moment section has adequate flexural capacity.
[6.10.4.1.23]
d. Positive Moment Compact-Section Check

Now check the capacity of the positive moment section at the 0.4 Girder
Point. Return to the flow chart and enter it in the upper right hand
corner in the box with the heading Article 6.10.4.1.2. Check if the web is
compact. For the web to be compact the following inequality must be
satisfied:
2 Dcp
E
3.76
tw
Fy
To determine Dcp use Appendix A from Section 6. The figure for load
components for positive bending sections is presented in Figure 6.9.8.
Figure 6.9.8
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
6-50
To simplify computations neglect the Prt and Prb terms.

Pc = Force in the top flange = 500.87518 = 787.5 kips
Pw = Force in the web = 500.62566 = 2063 kips
Pt = Force in the bottom flange = 500.87520 = 875 kips
Ps = Force in the slab = 0.854(9117+1.518) = 3672 kips
Begin by checking Case I (PNA in the web of the girder).
Pt + Pw = 875 + 2063 = 2938 kips
Pc + Ps = 787.5 + 3672 = 4459.5 > 2938
Therefore the PNA is not in the web.

Try Case II (PNA in the top flange)
Pt + Pw + Pc = 875 + 2063 + 787.5 = 3725.5 kips
Ps = 3672 < 3725.5 kips
Therefore the PNA is in the top flange. Use the equation in the appendix
to locate the position of the PNA in the top flange.
0.875 2063 + 875 3672
t P + Pt Ps
y = c w
+ 1 =
+ 1 =0.03 in
2
P
2
787
.
5
With the PNA located in the top flange the entire web is in tension. This
in turn implies that Dcp is zero and the inequality in Article 6.10.4.1.2 is
satisfied. For the positive moment section the web is compact.
The note on the flow chart for the asterisk states that for composite
sections in positive flexure, certain Articles are considered automatically
satisfied. Proceeding to the right from the box in the upper left-hand
corner we arrive at three boxes with asterisks.
These boxes are
automatically satisfied. We proceed to the right and arrive at the box in
the upper right hand corner with the heading Article 6.10.4.2.1 or
6.10.4.2.2.
[6.10.4.2.2]
The span under consideration is continuous, with a negative flexural

region over the interior support that is noncompact.
The LRFD
Specifications recognize the reduced capacity for load redistribution in
spans with noncompact sections. The positive flexural section is typically
not permitted to reach the plastic moment capacity (Mp) in such cases.
JULY 2003
[Equation
6.10.4.2.2a-3]
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
6-51
Compute the capacity with the Approximate Method.

This method
requires the computation of My. The procedure for determining My is
presented in Appendix A6.2 of the LRFD Specifications.
M
M
M
Fy = DC1 + DC2 + AD
Snc
S3n
Sn
Rearrange and solve for MAD, the additional moment required to reach
yield in a flange.
M
M
M AD = Sn Fy DC1 DC2
Snc
S3n
The additional moment for the bottom flange is

1.25 2400 12 1.25 564 12
M AD = 2229 50
1575
2037
= 51,244 k-in = 4270 k-ft

And the additional moment for top flange is
1.25 2400 12 1.25 564 12
M AD = 15,443 50
1503
5079
= 376,534 k-in = 31,378 k-ft

A smaller additional moment is required to yield the bottom flange,
therefore MAD = 4270 k-ft
My = MDC1 + MDC2 + M AD = 1.25 2400 + 1.25 564 + 4270 = 7975 k-ft
The nominal flexural resistance based on LRFD Equation 6.10.4.2.2a-3
can now be computed.
Mn = 1.3 R h My = 1.3 1 7975 = 10,367 k-ft
The flexural resistance determined with Equation 3 can be no more than
the value computed for the case where the negative flexural section is
compact. The limiting value for this case is that computed with Equation
1 or 2. To determine which equation should be used, compute Dp and
D.
Dp = t s + t h + y = 9 + 1.5 + 0.03 = 10.53 in
[Equation
6.10.4.2.2b-2]
D' =
d + t s + th
67.75 + 9 + 1.5
= 0.7
= 7.3 in
7.5
7.5
Dp is greater than D and less than 5D, therefore Equation 2 is to be

used. Compute Mp using the Case II Equation in Appendix A6.1 Table
A6.1-1.
Pc
Mp =
y 2 + (t c y )2 + [Ps ds + Pw dw + Pt dt ]
2 tc
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
6-52
ds = y + t h +
ts
9
= 0.03 + 1.5 + = 6.03 in
2
2
dw = t c y +
66
D
= 0.875 0.03 +
= 33.85 in
2
2
t
0.875
dt = t + D + (tc y) =
+ 66 + (0.875 0.03) = 67.28 in
2
2
Substituting P, d, t, and y terms into the equation for Mp results in

787.5
Mp =
(0.03)2 + (0.875 0.03)2
2 0.875
+ [3672 6.03 + 2063 33.85 + 875 67.28]
= 151,166 k-in = 12,597 k-ft
Use LRFD Equation 6.10.4.2.2a-2 to compute the limiting flexural

resistance for the positive moment region.
5 Mp 0.85 My 0.85 My Mp Dp
+
Mn =
4
4
D'
5 12,597 0.85 7975 0.85 7975 12,597 10.53
+
4
4
7.30
= 11,954 k-ft
Mn =
The 11,954 k-ft value from equation 2 is more than the 10,367 k-ft value
obtained with Equation 3.
Therefore the flexural resistance of the
positive moment section is 10,367 k-ft.
Mu = 1.25 (2400) + 1.25 (564) + 1.75 3898 0.74
= 8753
< 10,367 k-ft
Therefore, the positive moment section has adequate flexural strength.
[6.10.3.2]
e. Constructibility
The capacity of the girders should be evaluated during construction, prior
to composite action carrying the loads. For this example, the check
consists of placing selfweight and formwork on both spans, while deck
dead loads and a 20 psf construction live load is placed on one span.
Load factors for this check are based on the values provided in LRFD
Article 3.4.2, where 1.25 is used on dead loads and 1.5 is used on live
loads.
The factored construction moment for the positive moment
section is:
Mu temp = 1.25 DC temp + 1.5 LL temp
Mu temp = 1.25 (3425) + 1.50 (464) = 4977 k-ft
JULY 2003
[6.10.3.2.2-1]
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
6-53
We return to the flow chart to evaluate the constructibility of the girder.

Enter the flow chart at the box in the lower left-hand column with the
heading Article 6.10.3.2.2.
The first check for constructibility is to ensure that the bending stress fcw
in the web is not too large.
0.9 E k
fcw
Fyw = 50 ksi
2
tw
fcw =
Mu temp
I
yt
- tf
4977 12
= 38.72 ksi
52,106
34.66 0.875
Without longitudinal stiffeners in the web, = 1.25

D
k = 9.0
Dc
66
= 9
34.66 - 0.875
= 34.35
Substituting values into Equation 6.10.3.2.2-1 results in
0.9 29,000 1.25 34.35

= 100.5 ksi 50 ksi , set the limit at 50 ksi
2
66
0.625
fcw = 38.72 Fyw = 50 ksi , so the bending in the web is satisfactory.
Proceed up in the flow chart to the box with the heading of Article
6.10.4.1.4.
The top flange satisfies the aspect ratio inequality in Article 6.10.4.1.4.
bf
18
=
= 10.29 12
2 tf
2 0.875
Proceed to the right in the flow chart to the box with the heading of
Article 6.10.4.1.9. Check if the bracing spacing is less than Lp. If so, the
non-lateral-torsional buckling equations are to be used to compute the
capacity of the section.
L p = 1.76 rt
Irt =
E
Fyc
0.875 183 34.66 - 0.875

+
12
3
0.6253
12
= 425.5 in4
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
A rt = 18 0.875 +
rt =
6-54
34.66 - 0.875
0.625 = 22.79 in2
3
425.5
= 4.32 in
22.79
Substituting values into the equation for Lp produces:

29,000
L p = 1.76 4.32
= 183 in
50
From the framing plan, cross frames are spaced at 30 feet in the positive
moment region (Lb = 360 inches). Lb is greater than Lp. Therefore the
flexural resistance of the section is less than My and the lateral-torsional
buckling equations are used. Proceed down and to the right in the flow
chart to the box with the heading Article 6.10.4.2.5 or 6.10.4.2.6. Begin
by checking the following inequality to see if Equation 1 can be used:
2 Dc
E
b
tw
Fy
[6.10.4.2.6]
The left side of the inequality is

2 Dc
2 (34.66 0.875)
=
= 108.1
tw
0.625
Over half the web is in compression (top flange smaller than bottom
flange), therefore b = 4.64. The right side of the inequality becomes:
E
29,000
= 4.64
= 111.7 > 108.1
Fy
50
Therefore, the inequality is satisfied and equation can be used:

J
I yc
Mn = 3.14 E Cb R h
0.772
L b
I yc
+ 9.87 d
L
R h My
J is the Saint Venant torsional constant and can be found with:

J=
=
D t w3 + b f t f 3 + b t t t 3
3
66 0.6253 + 20 0.8753 + 18 0.8753
= 13.86 in4
3
The weak axis moment of inertia of the top flange is:

I yc =
183 0.875
= 425 in 4
12
Rh = 1.0 and d = 67.75 in
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
6-55
Due to the uncertainties associated with the construction loads, use a

moment gradient correction factor (Cb) of 1.00.
Substituting values into the moment equation produces:
[Equation
6.10.4.2.6a-1]
425
13.86
67.75
Mn = 3.14 29,000 1.0 1.0
0.772
+ 9.87
360
425
360
= 65,810 kip-in = 5484 kip-ft
Compute the yield moment (My) and substitute in values to arrive at the
maximum flexural resistance.
R h My = R h Fy S xc = 1.0 50 1503 = 75,150 kip-in = 6262 k-ft
Use Mn = 5484 kip-ft
The flexural resistance of 5484 k-ft is greater than the factored moment
of 4977 k-ft. Use a cross frame spacing of 30 feet.
H. Investigate the
Service Limit State
Overload provisions in past AASHTO design specifications controlled the

amount of permanent deflection and the performance of slip-critical
connections. The Service II load combination is used in a similar fashion
for LRFD designs.
Service II = 1.00(DC+DW)+1.3LL
[6.10.5.1]
The narrative in LRFD Article 6.10.5.1 states that the web bending stress,
fcw, shall satisfy the LRFD Equation 6.10.3.2.2-1.
0.9 E k
fcw
Fyw = 50 ksi
2
D

tw
[6.10.3.2.2-1]
fcw =
(2400)
(564)
1.3 (3898) gM
+
+
Sweb (nc) Sweb (3n)
Sweb (n)
(2400)
(564)
1.30 (3898) 0.74
12
=
+
+
131,943
52,106
98,515
(34.66 - 0.875) (19.40 - 0.875)

(8.54 - 0.875)
= 22.6 ksi
There are no longitudinal stiffeners in the web, = 1.25 . To arrive at a
conservative k value use the Dc value of the noncomposite section
D
k = 9.0
Dc
66
= 9
34.66 - 0.875
= 34.35
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
6-56
Plug in the values to arrive at the limiting stress
0.9 29,000 1.25 34.35
= 100.5 ksi
2
66
0.625
The upper limit is capped by the material strength of 50 ksi

fcw = 22.6 ksi 50 ksi, so the web bending stress is satisfactory.
H.1 Flange Stress
Limitations
For composite sections the stress in the flanges, ff, when subjected to
Service II load combinations must be less than 95 percent of the yield
strength of the flange. The noncompact web section over the pier limits
the stress in the flanges to Fy when evaluating strength load
combinations. The sections should readily pass this check due to the
smaller load factors associated with the Service II load combination.
ff 0.95 Fy = 47.5 ksi
[6.10.5.2]
a. Positive Flexural Region

Top Flange
564
1.3 (3898) 0.74
2400
ff =
+
+
12 = 23.4 ksi 47.5 ksi
1503
5079
15,443
Bottom Flange
564
1.3 (3898) 0.74
2400
ff =
+
+
12 = 41.8 ksi 47.5 ksi
2229
1575 2037
b. Negative Flexural Region

Top Flange
6693 1378 1.3 (4900) 0.799
ff =
+
+
12 = 35.0 ksi 47.5 ksi
5114
4057 5114
Bottom Flange
6693 1378 1.3 (4900) 0.799
ff =
+
+
12 = 38.1 ksi 47.5 ksi
4246
4057 4246
I. Investigate the
Fatigue Limit State
[6.6.1.2.3]
Only details with fatigue resistance Category C or lower resistance need

to be evaluated during design. Details that are classified as Category B
and above no longer need to be checked.
To improve the fatigue resistance of steel superstructures, Mn/DOT
attaches cross frame connection plates and transverse stiffeners to the
tension flange with a bolted connection.
JULY 2003
I.1 Fatigue
Loading
[3.6.1.4]
[6.6.1.2.2]
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
6-57
The HL-93 truck is used to generate the fatigue loads that are used to
evaluate different components of a design. For fatigue, the HL-93 truck
has a fixed rear axle spacing of 30 feet. In addition, a load factor of 0.75
is applied to calibrate the stresses to those observed in field studies. The
dynamic load allowance for fatigue loading is 15 percent. Distribution for
fatigue is equal to the one design lane loaded distribution, with the
multiple presence factor removed (if approximate equations are used for
one lane loaded).
(f) (F)n
= load factor for fatigue = 0.75
(f) = Live Load stress range
(F)n = nominal fatigue resistance
I.2 Check Largest

Stress Range
Location
The unfactored fatigue moments in Table 6.9.8 are multiplied by the

fatigue load factor (0.75) and the appropriate distribution factor to arrive
at the design moment ranges for fatigue. In Table 6.9.16 the stresses at
the top of the top flange are computed by dividing the design moment
range by the composite (n) section modulus.
For this example, the details with fatigue resistances less than B that
should be investigated for fatigue are: the shear studs attached to the
top flange and the web to connection plate/stiffener welds. Details
subject to stress ranges less than the infinite life fatigue threshold are
assumed to have infinite life. The factor accounts for the probability
that some vehicles larger than the HL-93 fatigue truck will cross the
bridge.
Designers should note that the fatigue distribution factor for the exterior
girder is significantly larger (0.676 versus 0.434) than that of the interior
girders.
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
6-58
Table 6.9.16 Fatigue Range (Truck Moments and Moment Range from
Table 6.9.8)
Fatigue
Loads Per Lane
Design**
Moment
Range
(K-FT)
Top
Stress
(KSI)
Bottom
Stress
(KSI)
1043
315
0.24
1.70
-236
1774
536
0.42
2.89
1625
-354
2276
688
0.53
3.70
0.4
1715
-472
2515
760
0.59
4.09
0.5
1654
-590
2581
780
0.61
4.20
0.6
1469
-708
2504
757
0.59
4.08
0.7
1126
-826
2245
679
0.53
3.66
0.71
1084
-838
2210
668
0.52
3.60
0.8
667
-943
1852
603
2.23
2.95
0.842
306
-1039
1547
504
1.86
2.47
0.895
268
-1055
1521
495
1.16
1.40
0.9
253
-1061
1511
492
1.15
1.39
1.0
-1180
1357
442
1.04
1.25
Girder
Point
Truck
Positive
Moment
(K-FT)
Truck
Negative
Moment
(K-FT)
Moment*
Range
(K-FT)
0.1
788
-119
0.2
1307
0.3
* Includes 15% Dynamic Load Allowance

**Girder Point 0.1 0.7: (Moment Range) x 0.75 x 0.403
Girder Point 0.71 1.0: (Moment Range) x 0.75 x 0.434
I.3 Top Flange
With Shear Studs
[Table 6.6.1.2.3-1]
[Table 6.6.1.2.5-3]
I.4 Stiffener To
Web Weld
[Table 6.6.1.2.3-1]
[Table 6.6.1.2.5-3]
The top flange has welded shear studs that are a Category C detail.
Category C details have a constant amplitude fatigue threshold of 10.0
ksi. The shear connectors are attached to the top flange of the section.
From Table 6.9.16 the largest top flange stress range occurs at Girder
Point 0.71 (2.23 ksi). This value is below of the constant amplitude
fatigue threshold (5.0 ksi). Therefore, the shear studs are assumed to
have an infinite fatigue life.
Mn/DOT Detail B411 provides the cope detail for stiffeners and
connection plates. The connection to the tension flange is with a bolted
tab plate which is a Category B detail which need not be evaluated. The
stiffeners and connection plates are welded to the web of the girder. Per
Detail B411 this weld terminates approximately 3 inches above or below
the tension flange. The weld between the stiffener and web is classified
as a C fatigue detail that requires investigation.
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
6-59
The constant amplitude fatigue threshold for C details is 12.0 ksi and the
assumed infinite life fatigue threshold is 6.0 ksi. Reviewing Table 6.9.16
indicates that neither flange has a stress range over 4.20 ksi. The web
to stiffener welds are subject to a smaller stress range than the flanges.
By inspection, fatigue resistance is adequate.
Adequate resistance to load induced flexural fatigue is provided.
I.5 Fatigue
Requirements for
Web
[6.10.6.3]
[6.10.6.3-1]
To control out-of-plane flexing of the web under repeated live loading the
following constraints are placed on webs.
Flexure Check
The following check compares the flange stress to a maximum value.
This assumes that the stress in the web due to flexure is approximately
the same as that found in the flange.
If
k E
D
0.95
tw
Fyw
the maximum compression flange stress (fcf) is Fyw (50 ksi). Otherwise
a more involved equation needs to be used. The value for k has been
previously computed as 34.35.
D
66
=
= 105.6
tw
0.625
0.95
k E
34.35 29,000
= 0.95
= 134.1 > 105.6
Fyw
50
Therefore, fcf Fyw

[6.10.6.2]
The live load used for this check is twice that presented in Table 6.9.16.
In the positive moment region at the 0.4 Girder Point
2400
564
2 760
fcf =
+
+
12 = 21.7 ksi 50.0 ksi
1503 5079 15,443
In the negative moment region at the 1.0 Girder Point
6693 1378 2 442
f cf =
+
+
12 = 28.7 ksi 50 ksi
4246
4057 4246
[6.10.6.4]
[Equation
6.10.6.4-1]
Shear Check
The computations for the resistance of the web in shear is based on the
following equation:
v cf 0.58 (C) Fyw
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
6-60
Where vcf is the maximum elastic shear stress in the web due to
unfactored permanent load and fatigue loading. C is defined in LRFD
Article 6.10.7.3.3a. It is the ratio of shear buckling stress to shear yield
strength.
Assume an unstiffened web.
D
66
=
= 105.6
tw
0.625
k =5+
1.38
C=
5
do
D

=5+
66

=5
Ek
29,000 5.0
= 1.38
= 74.32
Fyw
50
E k
1.52
29,000 5.0
=
= 0.395
2
2
F
50
yw 66
D

0.625
tw
1.52
v cf 0.58 (C) Fyw = 0.58 0.395 50
v cf 11.5 ksi
Table 6.9.17 Shear Fatigue

Girder
Point
DC1
Shear
(K)
DC2
Shear
(K)
0.0
94
0.1
0.2
Fatigue
(per lane, no impact)
Vcf*
(K)
vcf**
(KSI)
Minimum
Shear (K)
Maximum
Shear (K)
21
-8
61
181
4.4
67
16
-8
52
140
3.4
39
-9
43
95
2.3
0.3
12
-17
35
53
1.3
0.4
-15
-3
-27
26
-47
-1.2
0.5
-44
-9
-34
20
-90
-2.2
0.6
-70
-16
-42
14
-132
-3.2
0.7
-99
-21
-50
-174
-4.2
0.711
-101
-22
-50
-177
-4.3
0.8
-127
-27
-56
-215
-5.2
0.842
-144
-31
-61
-241
-5.9
0.895
-155
-33
-62
-255
-6.2
0.9
-157
-34
-62
-258
-6.3
1.0
-189
-39
-67
-301
-7.3
* DC1+DC2+(Maximum Shear or Minimum Shear) x 0.725 x 0.75 x 2.0

** Vcf / (66 x 0.625)
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
6-61
Based on an unstiffened web, the shear stresses at all girder points are
well below the 11.5 ksi permitted. The web satisfies the shear fatigue
checks. If stiffeners are added later, the resistance of the web will
increase and the check will still be satisfied.
J. Strength Limit
State Shear
Resistance
[6.10.7]
Within the commentary to LRFD Article 6.10.7.1 a flow chart identifies

the steps for the shear design of I-sections. A copy of the flow chart is
provided below in Figure 6.9.9
Figure 6.9.9
[6.10.7.2-1]
The cross section is homogeneous or non-hybrid. Move down the flow

chart on the right hand side. Determine the maximum shear capacity of
the section with an unstiffened web and compare that to the required
shear resistance.
Vn = C Vp
Vp = 0.58 Fyw D t w = 0.58 50 66 0.625 = 1196 kips
C is dependent on the web depth to thickness ratio.
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
6-62
D
66
=
= 105.6
tw
0.625
[6.10.7.3.3a-7]
The appropriate equation for C is selected based on how slender the web
is:
Ek
29,000 5
1.38
= 1.38
= 74.3 < 105.6
Fyw
50
Therefore,
C=
1.52
D

tw
E k
1.52
=
Fyw [105.6]2
29,000 5
= 0.395
50
The capacity of the unstiffened web is:

Vn = 0.395 1196 = 473 kips
Vr = Vn = 473 kips
J.1 Pier Section
Assume the critical section for shear is at Girder Point 1.0. Based on
Tables 6.9.3, 6.9.9, and 6.9.11, the factored shear force over the pier is:
Vu = 1.25 (189 + 39) + 1.75 156 1.112 = 285 + 304 = 589 kips > Vn
The resistance of an unstiffened web is less than the demand of 589 kips;
therefore transverse stiffeners are required near the pier.
[6.10.7.3.2]
Check the handling requirements. The maximum D/tw ratio permitted is

150. The web for the design example has a D/tw ratio of 105.6;
Equation 1 is satisfied.
Investigate Equation 2.
The maximum
transverse stiffener spacing that satisfies the handling check is:
2
2
260
260
D
= 66
= 400 in
105.6
D/t w
To satisfy LRFD Article 6.10.7.1, the maximum spacing of transverse
stiffeners is three times the depth of the web:
3 D = 3 (66) = 198 in
Where required, transverse stiffeners can be spaced no further apart
than 198 inches.
Go to Article 6.10.7.3.3b to determine the required shear stiffener
spacing for a noncompact section.
Try a 8 foot spacing for transverse stiffeners (a cross frame is located at
16 foot and 32 foot distances from Girder Point 1.0).
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
6-63
Compute k for a stiffener spacing of 96 inches.

5
5
k =5+
=5+
= 7.36
2
2
96
do
D
66

1.38
C=
[6.10.7.3.3b-3]
1.52
D

tw
Ek
29,000 7.36
= 1.38
= 90.16 < 105.6
Fyw
50
E k
1.52
=
Fyw 66 2
0.625
29,000 7.36
= 0.582
50
For Girder Point 1.0, under factored loads, the compression flange has a
stress of 49.0 ksi, and a resistance of 50.0 ksi. Therefore, fu is greater
than 75 percent of Fy and LRFD Equation 6.10.7.3.3b-2 is used to arrive
at the resistance of the stiffened web. Begin by computing the R and
Vp parameters:

Fr fu
50 49
R = 0.6 + 0.4
= 0.6 + 0.4
= 0.632
50 37.5
Fr 0.75 f Fy
Vp = 0.58 Fyw D t w = 0.58 50 66 0.625 = 1196 kips
Substituting into Equation 2, one arrives at:
[6.10.7.3.3b-2]
0.87 (1 C)
0.87 (1 0.582)
= 0.632 1196 0.582 +
Vn = R Vp C +
2
2
d
96
1+
1+ o
66
= 595 kips
However, Vn should also be larger than CVp = 0.5821196 = 696 kips
The resistance of 696 kips is more than the demand of 589 kips. An 8
foot stiffener spacing works over the pier. Next, determine where
transverse stiffeners can be dropped.
At 24 feet away from the pier, the shear demand is:
Vu = 1.25(144+31) + 1.75(134)1.112 = 480 kips
Which is slightly greater than the 473 kip resistance of the unstiffened
web.
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
6-64
The second cross-frame from the pier is the 0.789 point in the span. At
the 0.8 location the shear demand is:
V0.8 = 1.25 (127 + 27) + 1.75 (125) 1.112 = 436 kips
Therefore, provide stiffeners or cross frame connection plates to at least
32 feet away from the pier.
J.2 Abutment
Section
[6.10.7.3.3c]
Begin by checking if the unstiffened web has adequate capacity.

For an unstiffened web the shear buckling coefficient (k) is equal to 5.
This leads to a C coefficient of 0.395 when using LRFD Equation
6.10.7.3.3a-7. Knowing Vp and C, the shear resistance for the end panel
can be computed.
Vn = CVp = 0.3951196 = 473 kips
At Girder Point 0.0 the shear demand is:
Vu = 1.25 (94 + 21) + 1.75 (130) (1.112) = 144 + 253 = 397 < 473 kips
The web has adequate capacity at the abutment without stiffeners.
J.3 Transverse
Stiffener Design
[6.10.8.1]
[6.7.3]
It will be shown that 3/8 x 5 stiffeners satisfy the code requirements for
transverse stiffeners, however, they are very thin. Ideally the size of the
stiffener should be coordinated with the cross frame connection plates.
Fabrication of the girder will be simplified if only one plate size and
thickness is welded to the web at non bearing locations. In addition,
transverse stiffeners and diaphragm connection plates should be detailed
with widths that are in quarter inch increments. This provides the
fabricator additional flexibility. They can either cut the stiffeners and
connection plates out of large mill plate or utilize standard flat bar stock.
Transverse stiffeners are required near the pier. Mn/DOTs Bridge Detail
B411 (Stiffener Details) address the constraints placed on stiffeners in
LRFD Article 6.10.8.1.1.
The dimensions of transverse stiffeners are required to fall within
geometric constraints based on section depth, flange width, and
projecting element thickness.
[6.10.8.1.2-1]
[6.10.8.1.2-2]
Begin with the projecting width constraint:

d
71.5
b t 2.0 +
= 2.0 +
= 4.38 inches
30
30
The constraint based on flange width is:
16.0 t p b t 0.25 b f = 0.25 20 = 5.0 inches
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
6-65
Try a pair of 5-inch stiffeners. Each must be at least 3/8-inch thick, per
Mn/DOT Detail B402 or B407.
In addition to good aspect ratios, the stiffeners must also have adequate
area and moment of inertia. Check the minimum required moment of
inertia to comply with LRFD Article 6.10.8.1.3.
2
D
66
J = 2.5 2.0 = 2.5 2.0 = 0.818 0.5
d
96
o
Therefore, J = 0.5.
The required stiffness of the stiffeners is:
Required I t do t w3 J = 96 0.6253 0.5 = 11.72 in4
The stiffeners inertia taken about the center of the web is:
1
0.375 10.6253 = 37.5 > 11.72 in4
Actual It =
12
Adequate stiffness is provided. Check to see if the area satisfies Article
6.10.8.1.4. Begin by determining Fcr.
0.311 E 0.311 29,000
Fcr =
=
= 50.73 50 ;
Fcr = 50 ksi
2
2
b t
5

0.375
t p
Fyw
V
D
(1 C) u 18
A s 0.15 B
t w2
t
V
F
w
r
cr
With B = 1.0 for stiffener pairs:
50
66
589
A s 0.15 1.0
0.6252 = 4.8
18
(1 0.582)
0
.
625
696
50
The web provides adequate resistance, consequently, the required area

of the stiffeners is negative.
J.4 Bearing
Stiffener Design
[6.10.8.2.1]
For welded plate girders, bearing stiffeners are needed at both the
abutments and piers.
Abutment Bearing
The reaction to be carried by the bearing stiffeners is:
Bu = 1.25 (94 + 21) + 1.75 (130) 1.112 = 397 kips
Similar to transverse stiffeners, there are constraints on the geometry of
bearing stiffeners.
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
6-66
For a first try, assume the resistance bearing stress is approximately 35

ksi for 50 ksi stiffeners. Approximately 11.3 square inches of bearing
stiffener is required. Assume half is placed on each side (5.65 square
inches). Further, assume that the bearing stiffeners extend almost to the
outside edges of the narrower flange, which is the top flange and 18
inches in width near the abutment. Try a x 8 (Area = 6 in2) bearing
stiffener on each side of the web.
[Equation
6.10.8.2.2-1]
[Equation
6.10.8.2.3-1]
Begin by checking the projecting width.

E
29,000
b t = 8.0 0.48 t p
= 0.48 0.75
= 8.67
Fys
50
OK
The bearing resistance check is based on the net area of steel in contact
with the flange. Assuming a 1 inch cope at the bottom of the stiffener
in accordance with the B411 detail.
Br = b A pn Fys = 1.0 (0.75 (8.0 1.5) 2) 50 = 488 > 397 kips OK
The axial resistance of the bearing stiffener is found using the methods of
Article 6.9.2.1. Where restraint against buckling is provided in the plane
of the web and the effective length of the column is 75 percent of the
height of the web.
[6.10.8.2.4b]
The stiffener will act like a column while supporting the bearing reaction.
The effective section consists of the stiffeners, plus 18(thickness of the
girder web) (see Figure 6.9.10).
The area for this column is:
A = 0.75 8.0 2 + 11.25 0.625 = 19.03 in2
The moment of inertia about the girder web is:
1
1
I=
10.5 0.6253 +
0.75 16.6253 = 287.4
12
12
The radius of gyration is:
I
287.4
r=
=
= 3.886
A
19.03
Check the width/thickness limits of Article 6.9.4.2
b
8.0
E
29,000
=
= 10.67 k
= 0.45
= 10.84
t
0.75
Fy
50
OK
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
6-67
Figure 6.9.10
Column for Bearing Stiffener at Abutment
[6.9.4.1-3]
The effective length (KL) of the column is 0.75D=0.7566 = 49.5 inches.

Substitute values into the equation for .
2
2
50
Kl Fy
49.5
=
3.886 29,000 = 0.0283

r
Use LRFD Equation 6.9.4.1-1 to arrive at the nominal compression

resistance.
Pn = 0.66 Fy A s = 0.66 0.0283 50 19.03 = 940 kips
Multiply the nominal resistance by the resistance factor to arrive at the

factored compression resistance.
Pr = c Pn = 0.90 940 = 846 kips
which is greater than the 397 kips required
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
6-68
Therefore, use a pair of x 8 bearing stiffeners at the abutments.

Using the same design procedure, a pair of 1 x 9 bearing stiffeners
are adequate to carry the factored pier reaction of 1103 kips.
K. Investigate the
Shear Connector
Design
LRFD Article 6.10.7.4.1 discusses the design of shear connectors.

Connectors are to be placed along the full length of the girder, including
negative moment regions, because the girder is designed as composite
for negative moment.
Shear connectors are designed to satisfy fatigue constraints after which a
strength check is performed. Assume that 7/8 inch diameter shear
connectors will be used.
The minimum transverse spacing for connectors is 4.0 stud diameters.
For 7/8 inch diameter studs, this translates into a minimum spacing of
31/2 inches. The minimum clear distance from a stud to the edge of a
flange is 1.0 inch. With a 18 inch top flange width, the maximum
number of stud spaces placed in a line across the flange is:
18 2 (1) 0.875
= 4.3 spaces
3.5
Five studs across the flange is permissible, but use 4 shear studs at each
location.
The pitch or longitudinal spacing of sets of 4 shear studs is dictated by
LRFD Equation 6.10.7.4.1b-1.
n Zr I
Max p
Vsr Q
where p is the pitch of the studs, n is the number of studs provided at a
location, Zr is the fatigue resistance of an individual connector, I is the
short-term moment of inertia, and Q is the first moment of the deck area
or the rebar area about the neutral axis of the short-term composite
section.
[6.10.7.4.2-1]
The shear fatigue resistance of an individual connector is based on the

number of fatigue cycles anticipated. The resistance of a connector is
also no less than 2.75d2. This lower value corresponds to the resistance
for a stud subjected to approximately 26,200,000 cycles. Assume that
the connectors on the center girder are being designed. Also assume
that both traffic lanes generate fatigue loadings in the center girder.
Using 1.5 cycles per truck passage and a 75-year design life, 26.2 million
cycles is achieved with only 320 trucks per day in each direction.
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
6-69
N = 1.5 2 365 320 75 = 26.28x106 cycles

= 34.5 4.28 log N = 2.744
Zr = d2 = 2.744 (0.875)2 = 2.10 kips
The inertia values are taken from Table 6.9.2. For the positive moment
region I = 131,943 in4 and for the negative moment region use an I of
96,048 in4 (value for the smaller negative moment section). Now
compute the Q values. For the positive moment region:
Q=
t 1
9
3
b t s y t + stool + s = 117 9 8.54 + 1.5 +
= 1914 in
n
2 8
2
And for the negative moment region.

8.84 5.37 + 4.30 1.94
dr _ avg =
= 4.248 in from bottom of deck
8.84 + 4.30
][
Q = Art + A
y t + stool + dr_avg = [8.84 + 4.30] [29.56 + 1.5 + 4.25]
rb
3
= 464 in
Knowing n, Zr, I, and Q leaves the pitch to be a function of the fatigue

shear force range. For the positive moment region
n Zr I 4 2.10 131,943 579.1
=
=
Max p
Vsr Q
Vsr 1914
Vsr
For the negative moment region the required pitch is
n Zr I 4 2.10 96,048 1739
Max p
=
=
Vsr Q
Vsr 464
Vsr
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
6-70
Table 6.9.18 Shear Connector Spacing Computations
Max P
(positive)
Max P
(negative)
Max
P
limit
(in)
l***
Girder
Point
Negative
Shear
(K)
Positive
Shear
(K)
Fatigue*
Shear
gVf.
LL
Shear**
Range
(K)
0.0
-8
61
0.725
43
13.4
24
0.1
-8
52
0.725
38
15.4
24
0.2
-9
43
0.725
33
17.8
24
0.3
-17
35
0.725
33
17.8
24
0.4
-27
26
0.725
33
17.5
24
0.5
-34
20
0.725
34
17.0
24
0.6
-42
14
0.725
35
16.5
24
0.7
-50
0.725
36
16.0
24
0.8
-56
0.725
38
46.4
24
0.9
-62
0.725
40
43.5
24
1.0
-67
0.725
42
41.5
24
* Interior Girder Distribution Factor

** [maximum-minimum]1.15 0.75 gVf
*** The maximum limit for spacing of shear connectors is 24 inches per
LRFD Article 6.10.7.4.1b
By inspection, the negative moment criteria is satisfied if sets of two
studs are placed on a 20 inch spacing.
K.1 Determine
Anchor Studs at
Contraflexure
Points [6.10.7.4.3]
To positively anchor the longitudinal reinforcment considered part of the

section in the negative moment region, additional studs need to be
placed in the vicinity of the dead load contraflexure points. The number
of additional studs, nac, required are:
A f
nac r sr
Zr
where Zr is the shear resistance of a single stud (2.10 kips), Ar is the
total area of longitudinal reinforcement within the effective flange width
in the negative moment area (13.14 in2) and fsr is the stress range in
the reinforcement. Using the composite section property information for
the smaller negative moment section contained in Table 6.9.2, the
section modulus for the rebar can be computed. The average height of
the rebar above the concrete stool is 4.25 inches.
96,048
Sr =
= 2720 in3
[29.56 + 1.5 + 4.25]
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
6-71
The fatigue moment range at Girder Point 0.71 can be found in Table
6.9.8. It is 2210 k-ft. Multiplying by the load factor (0.75) and the
interior girder distribution factor of 0.725 results in a moment of
M = 2210 12 0.75 0.725 = 14,420 k - in
The stress in the rebar is
M 14,420
=
= 5.30 ksi
fsr =
Sr
2720
Plugging values into the equation, results in
A f
13.14 5.30
nac = r sr =
= 33.2 studs
Zr
2.10
Use 9 sets of 4 studs
They need to be placed within a length equal to 1/3 of the effective width
of the deck on each side of the contraflexure point. The effective deck
width is 117 inches, two-thirds of which is 78 inches. Dividing this
dimension by 8 (for 9 sets of studs) results in a spacing of 93/4 inches.
Place 9 sets of 4 studs at 9 inch centers near the contraflexure point.
K.2 Strength Limit
State [6.10.7.4.4]
In addition to anchorage studs and fatigue studs, adequate studs need to

be provided to ensure that the cross sections can generate the flexural
resistance computed earlier.
For positive moment areas, the lesser of the capacity of the deck or the
capacity of the steel section need to be provided on each side of the point
of maximum positive moment. The capacity of the deck is
Vh = 0.85 f'c b t s = 0.85 4 117 9 = 3580 kips
The capacity of the steel section is
Vh = Fyw D t w + Fyt b t t t + Fyc b f t f
= 50 [66 0.625 + 20 0.875 + 18 0.875] = 3725 kips
Provide resistance for 3580 kips on each side of the positive moment
peak location. The nominal resistance of a shear connector is
[6.10.7.4.4c-1]
Qn = 0.5 A sc f'c Ec A sc Fu
= 0.5 0.60 4 3605 = 36.0 kips & Asc Fu = 0.60 60 = 36 kips
Use a resistance of 36 kips for each shear stud at the strength limit state.
Each side of the positive moment peak requires
3580 kips
= 99.4 shear studs, say 100 studs
36 kips/stud
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
6-72
For the negative moment region, each side of the pier must have
sufficient shear studs to develop the capacity of the longitudinal
reinforcement in the deck.
Vh = A r Fyr = 13.14 60 = 788 kips
788 kips
= 22 shear studs
36 kips/stud
The final details for the shear studs need to satisfy all three constraints:
fatigue design, anchorage of negative reinforcement, and strength
design. After reviewing the constraints, the layout provided in Figure
6.9.13 satisfies all three constraints.
L. Investigate
the Field Splice
Design
Several items need to be considered when locating and designing field

splices for steel girders. Typically, splices are located near inflection
points to minimize the flexural resistance required of the connection. In
addition, designers need to ensure that adequate clearance is provided to
transverse stiffeners, cross-frame connection plates, etc.
As a general rule, designers should limit the number of plate thicknesses
used in a splice. The splice used for this example has only three plate
thicknesses (3/8, 1/2, and 5/8) used for the web splice plates, the flange
splice plates, and the fill plates.
The number of limit states and loading conditions to consider in the
design of a splice is significant. Construction, Service II (permanent
deflection), Fatigue, and Strength limit states should all be evaluated. In
most cases, the Strength Limit state will dictate the plate sizes and the
number of bolts.
Fatigue will not be investigated.
The bolted
connections used in the splice are Category B details. Per LRFD Article
6.6.1.2.3, only details with resistances below Category B require
investigation. For this example, the Strength I limit state governs the
design and only calculations related to this limit state are shown.
Typically, three splice plates are used for each flange and two splice
plates are used for the web. This permits all of the bolts to function in
double shear and minimizes the number of bolts required.
As the size of splice plates are considered, it is prudent to look at the
change in plate sizes on both sides of the splice. The thickness of fill
plates can be determined prior to any design of the connection. For this
example, the top flange on the left is 7/8 x 18 and on the right is 13/8 x
20. The fill plate for the top flange splice will have a thickness of 1/2.
The web on both sides of the splice is 5/8. No fill plate will be necessary
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
6-73
for the web. The bottom flange on the left is 7/8 x 20. The bottom
flange on the right is 13/8 x 20. A 1/2 fill plate will be required for the
bottom flange splice. Using splice plates of a 1/2 thickness, the number
of plate thicknesses required for the splice will be minimized.
The loads at the location of the splice are as follows:
Table 6.9.19 - Loads at Girder Point 0.71 (without load factors)
Component
Moment (k-ft)
Shear (k)
Girder
-47
16
Deck and Stool
-306
79
Barrier and FWS
-22
22
Positive LL+I
0.744 2390 = 1769
1.112 15 = 16.7
Negative LL+I
0.799 (-2152) = 1719
1.112 (-110) = -123
Positive Fatigue
0.403 1.15 1084 =

502
0.725 1.15 8 = 6.7
Negative Fatigue
0.433 1.15 (-838) =

-417
0.725 1.15 (-50) = 41.7
The loads are applied to the noncomposite, short-term composite (n),

and long-term composite (3n) cross sections. To arrive at design
stresses for the splice plates, the loads are applied to the appropriate
section. The stresses from the load components are then factored to
arrive at design stresses.
Flange splices are based on mid-flange
stresses.
Web splices can conservatively be based on mid-flange
stresses or can use the stresses at the top and bottom of the web. The
strength of the splice is based on the capacity of the smaller girder
framing into the connection. For this example, the positive moment
section is the smaller capacity member.
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
6-74
Table 6.9.20 - Section Properties for Splice Design

Section
Parameter
Moment of Inertia
(in4)
Noncomposite
Long-term
Composite
(3n)
52,106
70,371
Short-term
Composite (n)
Neg
Pos
Moment
Moment
70,371
131,943
yt (in)
34.66
28.6
28.6
8.54
yb (in)
33.09
39.15
39.15
59.21
Top Flange Thickness

(in)
0.875
0.875
0.875
0.875
Bottom Flange
Thickness (in)
0.875
0.875
0.875
0.875
Smid top flange (in3)
1523
2499
2499
16,284
Stop web (in3)
1542
2538
2538
17,214
Sbottom web (in3)
1617
1839
1839
2262
Smid bottom flange

(in3)
1596
1818
1818
2245
The design will be based on the resistance of bolts when the threads are
not excluded from the shear planes.
Consequently, the assumed
capacity of the bolt to resist shear and slip are comparable. For 7/8
diameter A325 bolts the resistance to shear is 43.9 kips per bolt with two
shear planes (before fill plate reductions). The slip resistance required
for the Service II load combination, is 39.0 kips per bolt with two shear
planes.
Table 6.9.21 Flexural Stress Components (Negative LL+IM)
DC1
DC2
LL
Strength I
Top Flange
(ksi)
2.78
0.11
8.26
18.06
Top of Web
(ksi)
2.75
0.10
8.13
17.79
Bottom of
Web (ksi)
-2.62
-0.14
-11.22
-23.09
Bottom
Flange (ksi)
-2.65
-0.15
-11.35
-23.36
Splices should be capable of resisting both positive and negative moment

live load conditions. Only the computations for the negative moment
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
6-75
case will be presented in this example. Reasons for this include: the
dead loads produce negative moments at the splice location, the positive
live load moments are smaller than the negative moments, and a smaller
composite structural section resists negative loads compared to positive
loads.
Top Flange Splice
Flange splices shall be designed to provide a minimum resistance design
stress of either:
fcf
+ f Fyf
Rh
Fcf =
2
or
0.75 f Fyf
whichever is greater.
For Strength I loading, the top flange has a factored flange stress of
18.06 ksi.
18.06
+ 1 1 50
1
= 34.03 ksi
Fcf =
2
or
0.75 1 1 50 = 37.50 ksi
Controls
37.5 b t = 37.5 18 0.875 = 591 kips
In order to assume that the flange force is evenly distributed between

the outer and inner splice plates, the cross sectional areas of the plates
need to be approximately the same. In addition, the area of the outer
plate and the sum area of the inner plates each need to have a cross
sectional area which is approximately half that of the flange. Try an
outer splice plate that is 1/2 x 18 (area = 9 in2). Try inner splice plates
that are 5/8 x 71/2 (area = 4.69 in2).
Now compute the resistance of a 7/8 diameter A325 bolt. The fill plate
for the top flange is thicker than 1/4 inch. Consequently, the fillers need
to be extended or the capacity of the bolts reduced. For this example,
the capacity of the bolts will be reduced (using LRFD Equation
6.13.6.1.5-1). Assume the filler plate is as wide as the flange. Ap is the
smaller of:
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
6-76
18 [0.875] = 15.75 in2

1
5
[18] + 2 [7.5] = 18.38 in2
2
8
[6.13.6.1.5-1]
18 0.5
Af
=
= 0.57
Ap
15.75
(1 + ) (1 + 0.57)
R =
=
= 0.73
(1 + 2 ) (1 + 2 0.57)
The capacity of a 7/8 diameter A325 bolt with threads in the shear plane
is:
R n = 0.38 A b Fub Ns R = 0.38 0.601 120 2 0.73 = 40.2 kips
The number of bolts required on the fill plate side of the connection is:
591
591
=
= 18.4 bolts
s 40.2 0.80 40.2
Use five rows of four bolts on each side of the splice.
The top flange is a tension flange under negative moment live load.
Check yielding on the gross sections and fracture on the net sections.
The outer plate and the inner plates must each carry 295.5 kips (591/2).
[6.8.2.1-1]
[6.8.2.1-2]
[6.8.2.2]
Outer Splice Plate

Yielding on the gross section
y Fy b t = 0.95 50 18 0.5 = 427.5 295.5 kips
Fracture on the net section
u Fu t (b 4 1) U = 0.80 65 0.5 (18 4 1) 1
= 364 295.5 kips
Inner Splice Plates
y Fy 2 b t = 0.95 50 2 7.5 0.625 = 445.3 295.5 kips
Fracture on the net section
u Fu t 2 (b 2 1) = 0.80 65 0.625 2 (7.5 2 1)
= 357.8 295.5 kips
JULY 2003
[Equation
6.13.2.9-1]
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
6-77
Bolt Bearing
Check the bearing on the smaller flange plate (element carrying the
double shear load)
Rn = 2.4 d t Fu = 2.4 0.875 0.875 65 = 119.4 > 40.2 kips OK
Block Shear Check
Check block shear on a transverse section through the smaller flange
plate with the design force for the flange.
A tn = [18 4 0.9375] 0.875 = 12.47 in2
[Equation
6.13.4-1]
Rr = bs Fu A tn = 0.80 65 12.47 = 648.4 > 591 kips
OK
Bottom Flange Splice

The procedure for designing the splice of the bottom flange is the same
as the design of the top flange with one exception, its a compression
flange instead of tension flange. As a result, the sole check on the plates
is against yield of the gross area and c value of 0.90 is used as part of
the check.
Like the top flange, the splice plates for the bottom flange should be
balanced for the load to be shared equally between inner and outer
plates. Try an outer splice plate that is 1/2 x 20 (area = 10 in2). Try
inner splice plates that are 5/8 x 81/2 (area = 5.31 in2).
Under Strength I loading the bottom flange has a factored flange stress
of 23.36 ksi.
37.5 b t = 37.5 20 0.875 = 656 kips
The resistance of a 7/8 diameter A325 bolt in the bottom flange with a
1
/2 fill plate can now be determined. Again, assume the filler plate is as
wide as the flange.
A
20 0.5
= f =
= 0.57
Ap
20 0.875
(1 + ) (1 + 0.57)
R =
=
= 0.73
(1 + 2 ) (1 + 2 0.57)
The capacity of a 7/8 diameter A325 bolt with threads in the shear plane
is:
R n = 0.38 A b Fub Ns R = 0.38 0.601 120 2 0.73 = 40.2 kips
The number of bolts required on the fill plate side of the connection is:
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
6-78
656
656
=
= 20.4 bolts
s 40.2 0.80 40.2
Use 5 sets of four bolts on each side of the splice.

Check compression yielding on the gross sections. The outer plate and
the inner plates must each carry 328 kips (656/2).
Outer Splice Plate
c Fy b t = 0.90 50 20 0.5 = 450 328 kips
Inner Splice Plates
c Fy 2 b t = 0.90 50 2 8.5 0.625 = 478 328 kips
[Equation
6.13.2.9-1]
Bolt Bearing
Check the bearing on the smaller flange plate (element carrying the
double shear load)
Rn = 2.4 d t Fu = 2.4 0.875 0.875 65 = 119.4 > 40.2 kips OK
Block Shear Check
Check block shear on a transverse section through the smaller flange
plate with the design force for the flange.
A tn = [20 4 0.9375] 0.875 = 14.22 in2
[Equation
6.13.4-1]
Rr = bs Fu A tn = 0.80 65 14.22 = 739.4 > 656 kips
OK
Web Splice
The web is designed to carry the entire factored vertical shear force. In
addition it must carry the moment due to the eccentricity of the shear
force and the flexural moment which the web was assumed to carry. The
flexural stresses in the web are resolved into flexural and axial
(horizontal) components about mid-depth of the web. This allows the
bolt group on each side of the splice to be designed for the vertical shear,
the moment associated with the eccentricity of the vertical shear, the
web flexural moment, and the resultant horizontal force in the web.
The vertical shear force to be carried is:
Vu = 1.25 (117) + 1.75 (123) = 362 kips
The nominal shear resistance of the unstiffened web is 473 kips.
design shear force is the average of the resistance and Vu.
The
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN

Vuw =
6-79
(Vu + Vr ) (362 + 473)

=
= 417 kips
2
2
Assume a horizontal bolt pitch of 3 inches and two vertical rows of bolts
on each side of the splice. The eccentricity of the shear is the distance
from the center of the bolt pattern to the center of the splice:
3 3.5
+
= 3.25
2
2
The moment associated with the vertical shear is:
Mv = 3.25 421 = 1370 k - in
For factored loads the flexural stress at the top of the web is 17.8 ksi and
the stress at the bottom of the web is 23.1 ksi. Similar to the flanges,
the web is to be designed for a stress of 75 percent of yield or 37.5 ksi.
Assume that the Strength I loads are scaled up such that the bottom
stress becomes 37.5 ksi (scale factor of 1.624). Using the same scale
factor, the stress at the top of the web is 28.9 ksi.
28.9 ksi
33.2 ksi
-37.5 ksi
-4.3 ksi
-33.2 ksi
-4.3 ksi
The section modulus of the web is:

S=
I 1/12 (0.625) 663

=
= 454 in3
c
66/2
The flexural moment carried by the web with a stress of 33.2 ksi is:
M = S b = 454 33.2 = 15,080 k - in
The horizontal force generated in the web with an axial stress of 4.3 ksi
is:
H = H D t w = 4.3 66 0.625 = 178 kips
The design forces for the web splice are:
Vuw = 417 kips
Huw = 178 kips
Muw = 15,080 + 1370 = 16,450 k-in
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
6-80
The values for Muw and Huw can also be calculated using equations
C6.13.6.1.4b-1 & 2.
The vertical shear and the horizontal force are assumed to be resisted
equally by all bolts in the fastener group. The force carried by each of
the bolts to resist flexure is assumed to be proportional to its distance
from the center of the fastener group.
The force in each of the bolts can be found with the following equations
from Johnston, Lin, and Galambos Basic Steel Design text:
P
M yA
R xA = R xp + R xm = x
n
r2
R yA = R yp + R ym =
Py
n
M XA
2
ri
R A = R xA 2 + R yA 2
Assuming two vertical rows of bolts on each side of the splice and 21
bolts in each row. Try a horizontal pitch of 3 inches and a vertical pitch
of 3 inches. The bolts at the corners of the fastener group will be subject
to the largest forces. The coordinates at the corners are x= 11/2 inches
and y= 30 inches. Summing the square of lever arms to all of the bolts
results in a ri2 value of 13,955.
Substituting values in the above equations produces
H
M yA
178 16,450 (30)
R xA = uw
=
= 39.60 kips
2
n
42
13,955
r
R yA =
Py
n
M xA
ri2
421 16,450 (1.5)
= 11.86 kips
42
13,955
R A = R xA 2 + R yA 2 = 39.602 + 11.86 2 = 41.3 43.9 kips
No fill plates are used in the web splice, consequently the entire 43.9 kips
of capacity per bolt can be used.
The plates used in the web splice must have adequate resistance to carry
the vertical shear. Two 3/8 thick plates are being used for the splice.
Assume the plates are 63 inches tall (20 3 + 2 11/2)
Gross area of the plates:
A g = 63 2 0.375 = 47.25 in2
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
6-81
Assumed vertical shear resistance:

Vn = 0.58 Fy A g = 0.58 50 47.25 = 1370 421
[Equation
6.13.2.9-1]
Bolt Bearing
Check the bearing on the web plate
Rn = 2.4 d t Fu = 2.4 0.875 0.625 65 = 83.3 > 40.2 kips
OK
The stress in the web splice plates should be below yield when subjected
to Muw and Huw.
Section modulus of the web splice plates is:
S = 2
t w D sp3
t w D sp 2
1
0.375 632
=
=
= 496.1
12
D sp / 2
3
3
Knowing the section modulus and the area of the plates, the stress can
be computed:
H
M
178
16,450
= uw + uw =
+
= 37.0 50 ksi
Ag
S
47.25
496.1
The assumed web splice details have adequate capacity. The field splice
is detailed in Figure 6.9.11.
Figure 6.9.11
JULY 2003
M. Investigate
Deflection
[3.6.1.3.2]
[2.5.2.6.2]
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
6-82
Consider with the Service I load combination. No sidewalk or bicycle

path is provided on the bridge, in accordance with Mn/DOT policy, the
live load deflection limit is L/800. The maximum deflection permitted for
this example is:
L/800 = 152(12)/800 = 1.82 in
Two live loads are applied to the bridge and evaluated for the deflection
check. Take the larger of:
Design Truck alone
25% of Design Truck + Lane Loading
When computing deflections a separate distribution factor is used. It is
simply the number of design lanes divided by the number of girders.
Mn/DOT practice is to use a multiple presence factor for deflections of no
less than 0.75 (See Section 3.4.2). For this example, the distribution
factor is:
Number of Design Lanes
4
g =
MPF = 0.75 = 0.60
Number of Girders
5
The maximum deflections (like the moments) are based on the composite
section, including the deck in the negative regions.
Not including
dynamic load allowance, the maximum deflections for a full lane or truck
are:
truck = 1.56 inches and occurs at 0.46 of span
lane = 1.30 inches and occurs at 0.46 of span
Including the distribution factor and adding the dynamic load allowance
results in the following live load deflections:
Maximum truck deflection
= [1 + IM] g truck = 1.33 0.6 1.56 = 1.25 < 1.82 in,
OK
Maximum lane and truck deflection

= 0.25 1.25 + g lane = 0.25 1.25 + 0.60 1.30 = 1.09 < 1.82,
N. Camber
OK
To ensure that steel bridges have the proper profile after construction,
they are fabricated with camber. Camber is an adjustment to the vertical
profile of a bridge. As dead loads are applied to the bridge during
construction, the bridge deflects.
The girders for this example, when rotated from their sides to a vertical
position, would deflect 0.72 inches downward at the 0.4 span point.
When the other DC1 dead loads (deck, stool) are added to the bridge, an
additional 3.69 inches of downward deflection is estimated for the 0.4
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
6-83
span point. The addition of barriers would add an additional deflection of

0.25 inches downward at the same location. Summing these values
results in an anticipated deflection of 4.66 inches. Deflections at 10th
points along the span are provided for selfweight, other DC1 loads, and
DC2 loads in the top of Figure 6.9.12.
The bottom of Figure 6.9.12 contains the camber diagram. In addition to
the anticipated deflection, a residual camber is also provided. The
residual camber is provided to prevent the appearance of sag in the span.
The residual camber provided is based on the span length. Mn/DOTs
policy is to use 11/2 inches of residual camber for a span of 100 feet. For
each additional 10 feet of span add 1/8 inch of residual camber is added.
The camber for the 0.4 girder point is computed as:
Span 100 1
camber = [dead load deflection] +
8 + 1.5
10
[0.72 + 3.69 + .25] + 152 100 1 + 1.5 = 6.81 ,
10
Figure 6.9.12
say 7 inches
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
6-84
Figure 6.9.13 contains a half elevation of the girder that summarizes the
design.
Figure 6.9.13
JULY 2003
O. End
Diaphragm
Design
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
6-85
The end diaphragm is used to support the end of the deck and to transfer
wind load to the supports. It also is required to carry jacking loads if the
bearings are replaced. Relative to the jacking loads and the dead and
live loads the wind loads for this example are relatively modest. The end
diaphragm will be designed for two load combinations, Strength I where
dead and live loads are carried on a simple noncomposite span, and
Strength I where dead loads and jacking loads are carried on simple span
as well.
The design simple span length will be the distance between girders
increased for the skew. See Figure 6.9.14.
Figure 6.9.14
Length of End Diaphragm
Dead Loads
Assume that the end diaphragm carries its own self weight, the weight of
a two foot strip of deck, and the additional weight of the thickened deck
at the joint. For dead load purposes, assume the additional thickness is
4 inches and that it is 14 inches wide.
Assume 50 pounds per lineal foot for the weight of the beam and steel
connections.
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
6-86
The assumed dead load per foot is:

9.5 14 4
w d = 0.050 + 0.150 2
= 0.346 kips/ft
+
12 12 12
Dead load shear is:

w d L 0.346 12.06
=
= 2.09 kips
2
2
Dead load moment is
w d L2
0.346 12.06 2
=
= 6.29 kip-ft
8
8
Consider two live load cases, one where the lane of traffic is centered
between the girders, and a second one where one of the truck wheels is
placed at the center of the diaphragm. The two cases are presented in
Figure 6.9.15. For Case 1, the live load is centered between the girders
and the shear force is:
10
V = 21.3 + 0.064 2
= 21.9 kips
2
This assumes two feet of lane load and includes dynamic load allowance
on the wheel load. The moment for this case is:
M 21.3 2.67 +
0.064 2 12.06 2
= 59.2 k - ft
8
For Case 2, assume that the left wheel is just to the right of the interior
girder. This will produce a conservative design shear. The shear force
for this case is:
5.67
7.67
V = 21.3 +
21.3 +
[8 2 0.064] = 32.0 kips
12.06
12.06
The moment for this case is:
M
[3.4.3.1]
5.67
7.67
62
21.3 6 +
[0.064 2 8] 6 0.128
= 58.4 k - ft
12.06
12.06
2
The shear force in the end diaphragms during jacking can be estimated
from the abutment reactions for the DC1 and DC2 loads. Jacking forces
have a 1.3 load factor. Assume that two jacks are used to lift each
interior girder and that they placed two feet away from the center of the
girder to clear the bearings.
1.3 (DC1 + DC2) 1.3 (94 + 21)
Vjack =
=
= 74.8 kips
2
2
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
CASE 1:
CASE 2:
Figure 6.9.15
Live Load placement on End Diaphragm
6-87
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
6-88
With each jack positioned two feet from the girder the moment in the end
diaphragm is:
10.06
74.8 2 = 125 k - ft
M jack =
12.06
By inspection, the jacking operation governs the design of the end
diaphragm. Begin by sizing a rolled beam based on shear capacity.
Assume the rolled section will satisfy the slenderness ratio to permit Vp
or 58 percent of the yield stress to be used.
V jack + VDL
74.8 + 2.1
=
= 2.65 in2 web area required
0.58 Fy
0.58 50
For the moment, assume that the rolled beam can reach My.
required section modulus for the beam is:
MDL + M jack
[125 + 6.3] 12 = 31.5 in3
Srequired =
=
Fy
50
The
After reviewing section properties in the AISC Manual of Steel

Construction try a W12x30 section. It has the following dimensions:
Table 6.9.22 - W12 x 30 Properties
Area (in2)
8.79
Depth (in)
12.34
Web Thickness (in)
tw
0.26
Flange Width (in)
bf
6.52
Flange Thickness (in)
tf
0.440
Section Modulus (in3)
38.6
Radius of Gyration (in)
rt
1.73
Determine the nominal shear capacity with LRFD Article 6.10.7.2.

D
12.34 2 (0.440)
=
= 44.1
tw
0.26
1.1
Ek
29,000 5
= 1.1
= 59.2 > 44.1
Fy
50
Therefore, C = 1.0 and the shear capacity of the beam is:

Vn = C Vp = 1 0.58 50 [12.34 2 0.44] 0.26
= 86 > 74.8 kips required
The flow chart for I-Sections in flexure (LRFD Figure C6.10.4-1) is used
to determine the resistance of the section. The plastic capacity of the
section will not be used. Enter the flowchart at the box with the heading
Article 6.10.4.1.4 and check the flange slenderness ratio.
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
6-89
bf
6.52
=
= 7.4 12.0
2 tf
2 0.440
Move to the right in the flow chart to the box with the heading Article
6.10.4.1.9 and check bracing of the compression flange.
L p = 1.76 rt
E
29,000
= 1.76 1.73
= 73.3 in
Fyc
50
The distance between the gusset plates is approximately 60 inches which

is less than Lp. Use a flexural resistance of My.
My = Fy S = 50 38.6 = 1,930 k-in = 160.8 k-ft > 125 k-ft required
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 6.1
6-90
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 6.2
6-91
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 6.3
6-92
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 6.4
6-93
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 6.5
6-94
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 6.6
6-95
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 6.7
6-96
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 6.8
6-97
JULY 2003
8. WOOD
STRUCTURES
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
8-1
Timber is used for several bridge applications. It is used as a primary

structural material on secondary roads (E.g., timber decks, pile caps,
and piles) and is often used for formwork and falsework on bridges with
cast-in-place concrete elements. This section provides general design
and detailing guidance for the LRFD design of timber decks and pile
caps. It concludes with two design examples; a spike-laminated timber
deck and a timber pile cap. Information on timber piles is provided in
Section 10 Foundations. Design guidance for timber railings can be
found in Section 13. Information on timber incorporated into the design
of formwork and falsework can be found in the Mn/DOT Bridge
Construction Manual. The construction of timber bridges is governed by
Mn/DOT Spec. 2403, Timber Bridge Construction.
8.1 Materials
A variety of materials are incorporated into timber bridges, ranging from

treated solid and laminated wood members to steel fasteners and
hardware.
8.1.1 Wood
Products
Structural timbers shall be visually graded West Coast Douglas Fir or

Southern (Yellow) Pine satisfying Mn/DOT Spec. 3426. Designs should
be based on Douglas Fir-Larch resistance values.
The LRFD nominal resistance values assume wet-use conditions and
treatment with preservatives. Table 8.1.1.1 lists typical base resistance
values.
[Table 8.4.1.1.4-1]
Table 8.1.1.1 Base Resistance and Modulus of Elasticity Values

Visually-Graded Sawn Lumber
Structural Component
Member
Species/Grade
Size
Base Resistance (KSI)

Fbo
Fto
Fvo
Fcpo
Fco
Eo
3.20
2.30
0.30
1.10
2.95
1.60
Douglas Fir-Larch
No.1 & Better
b= 2-4 in
d 2 in
Select Structural
B&S*
4.50
2.80
0.25
1.10
2.40
1.60
Select Structural
P&T**
4.20
2.95
0.25
1.10
2.45
1.60
Beam and Stringer Sizes
**
Post and Timber Sizes
All timber members, that become part of the permanent bridge

structure, should be treated with a preservative. Preservatives protect
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN

the timber against decay, insects and fire.
weathering and checking.
8-2
Treatment also retards
For roughsawn, full-sawn, or special sizes, the actual dimensions and

moisture content used in the design should be indicated in the contract
documents.
The design unit weight of timber components is 0.050 kcf.
[9.9.3.4]
The coefficient of thermal expansion of wood parallel to its fibers is

0.000002 inch/inch/F. in LRFD Article 9.9.3.4.
8.1.2 Fasteners
and Hardware
Structural steel elements incorporated into timber bridges must satisfy

the strength and stability checks contained in Section 6 of the LRFD
Specifications. For durability, almost all steel elements incorporated into
timber bridges are galvanized.
8.1.3 Wood
Preservatives
Wood preservatives are broadly classified as oil-type or waterborne

preservatives.
Oil-Type Preservatives
The three oil-type preservatives used in bridge applications are creosote,
pentachlorophenol, and copper naphthenate. For bridge applications,
oil-type preservatives are used almost exclusively for treating structural
components. They provide good protection from decay. Because most
oil-type treatments can cause skin irritations, they should not be used
for applications that require repeated human or animal contact, such as
handrails.
Creosote
It is commonly used in bridge applications. The high level of
insoluables can result in excessive bleeding of the treatment from
the timber surface, which has raised environmental concerns. The
use of creosote is expected to decline because of the expense to
meet EPA requirements.
Pentachlorophenol
As a wood preservative penta is a highly effective biocide. Penta is
not paintable and should not be used in applications subject to
human or animal contact. Although penta is still widely used, the
presence of trace dioxins has led to increased pressure to ban this
preservative.
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
8-3
Copper Naphthenate
Its primary advantage is that it is considered an environmentally
safe preservative. The use of copper naphthenate has been limited
in the past because of its high cost.
Waterborne Preservatives
Waterborne preservatives are used most frequently for railings and
floors on pedestrian sidewalks or other areas that may receive human
contact. After drying, wood surfaces treated with these preservatives
can also be painted or stained.
Of the numerous waterborne
preservatives, CCA, ACA, and CA are most commonly used in bridge
applications. Each of these preservatives is strongly bound to the wood,
thereby reducing the risk of chemical leaching.
CCA (Chromated Copper Arsenate)
Generally used to treat Southern Pine, and other (easier to treat)
wood species. This product will eventually be phased out because of
the environmental concerns with arsenic.
ACA (Ammonialal Copper Arsenate)
Similar to CCA but used for refractory (difficult to treat) wood
species, such as Douglas Fir-Larch.
CA (Copper Azole)
This is a water based treatment without arsenic. Some timber
bridge suppliers are phasing out the use of CCA and ACA and using
CA waterborne preservatives.
8.2 Timber Bridge

Decks
Timber decks can be incorporated into a bridge in a number of different

ways. They can be the primary structural element that spans from
substructure unit to substructure unit or they can be secondary
members used to carry vehicle or pedestrian loads to other primary
members. The use of timber decks with other primary members is quite
limited but they may be used with timber trusses or with steel stringers.
8.2.1 General
Section 9 of the LRFD Specifications (Decks and Deck Systems) provides

information on the design and detailing of decks. Information specific to
wood decks is covered in Article 9.9.
Three types of timber decks are used in Minnesota; glulam panels,
stress-laminated decks, and nail or spike laminated decks. To prevent
movement of the deck panels in the completed structure, positive
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN

attachment is
component.
required
between
the
8-4
panels
and
the
supporting
Glue Laminated Decks

Glulam timber deck panels consist of a series of panels, prefabricated
with water-resistant adhesives, which are tightly abutted along their
edges. Spreader beams are used to ensure load distribution between
panels.
Stress Laminated Decks
Stress laminated decks consist of a series of wood laminations that are
placed edgewise and post-tensioned together, normal to the direction of
the lamination.
In stress laminated decks, with skew angles less than 25, stressing bars
should be detailed parallel to the skew. For skew angles between 25
and 45, the bars should be detailed perpendicular to the laminations,
and in the end zones, the transverse prestressing bars should be fanned
in plan or arranged in a step pattern. Stress laminated decks should not
be used for skew angles exceeding 45.
Nail or Spike Laminated Decks
Spike laminated decks consist of a series of lumber laminations that are
placed edgewise between supports and spiked together on their wide
face. The laminated deck is prefabricated at a plant and shipped to the
site. The connection between adjacent panels is a ship-lap joint. In
addition to ship-lap joints, spreader beams are used to ensure proper
load distribution between panels. Laminates are treated prior to panel
fabrication.
[9.9.4.3.1]
Spreader Beams
Spreader or transverse stiffener beams are attached to the underside of
glulam and spike laminated decks. This guidance is based on research
conducted by the University of Minnesota on The Effect of Transverse
Stiffener Beams. The distance between beams can not exceed 8.0 feet,
and the rigidity, EI, of each stiffener beam can not be less than 80,000
2
kipin . The spreader beams must be attached to each deck panel near
the panel edges and at intervals not exceeding 15.0 inches. Mn/DOTs
standard spreader beam is a 6x12 member.
Bituminous Wearing Surface
The bituminous wearing course should have a minimum compacted
depth of 4 inches. For proper drainage, a cross slope of at least
0.02 ft/ft should be detailed.
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
8-5
8.2.2 Geometry
Timber decks should be laid out with panel widths that are multiples of 4
inches (typical deck laminate plan dimension). To facilitate shipping,
deck panels should be detailed with plan widths less than 7-6.
8.2.3 Design /
Analysis
Designs should be based on wet use conditions (>16% moisture content

for glulam and >19% for other members).
[4.6.2.1.3]
The LRFD Specifications provide equations that define the width of deck
assumed to carry one lane of traffic (equivalent strip widths). Mn/DOT
designs are performed on a unit strip one foot wide. Manipulate the
code values (invert and multiply by 12) to determine distribution factors
on a per foot basis.
The span length is the clear distance between pile caps plus one-half the
width of one pile cap. The span length can not exceed the clear span
length plus the thickness of the deck.
The maximum span length for a given deck thickness is dependent on
several factors including: superstructure type, wood type, and live load
intensity. Table 8.2.3.1 provides typical deck thickness and span length
values for various superstructure configurations. Table 8.2.3.2 contains
typical span lengths for deck thicknesses ranging from 10 to 16 inches.
Table 8.2.3.1 Typical Spans for Different Timber Deck Systems

Deck
Span
Thickness (IN)
Length (FT)
Spike-Laminated
8-16
10-34
Stress-Laminated
8-16
10-34
Longitudinal Panel
8-16
12-38
Stress-Laminated
9-24
10-60
Superstructure Type
Sawn Lumber Deck Systems
Glulam Deck Systems
Table 8.2.3.2 Typical Span Lengths for Standard Deck

Thicknesses
Deck Thickness (IN)
Effective Span Length (FT)
10
L 17
12
17 < L 25
14
25 < L 30
16
30 < L 36
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
8-6
For stress-laminated and glulam decks made continuous over more than
150 feet, the effects of thermal expansion and contraction should be
investigated.
Shear effects can be neglected for the design of wood decks.
Load Distribution and Modeling
All spans are designed as simple spans. Check bending of deck using
size factor, if applicable. Also check horizontal shear and compression
perpendicular to the grain. Calculate the required spacing of drive
spikes at the ship-lap joint and check shear transfer between each
lamination.
Dead Load
The bituminous wearing surface dead load is assumed to have a unit
weight of 0.150 kcf. A 0.020 ksf dead load is to be included in all
designs in order to accommodate a possible future wearing surface.
Live Load
For timber structures with longitudinal flooring, the live load shall be
considered a point loading in the direction of the span. Normal to the
direction of the span, the wheel load shall be distributed over the width
of the tire plus twice the thickness of the floor. The width of the contact
area of a standard tire is defined in LRFD Article 3.6.1.2.5.
8.2.4 Detailing
Metal plate connectors are used to attach deck panels to pile caps.
Detail no less than two metal tie-down plates per panel. The spacing of
the tie-downs along each support shall not exceed 3.0 ft.
8.2.5 Camber /
Deflections
Mn/DOT does not require wood decks to be fabricated with specific

camber values. During construction, the natural camber of the deck is
placed up to reduce the appearance of sag in a span.
8.3 Timber Pile

Caps
Timber pile caps are used for timber deck bridges supported on cast-inplace piles or timber piles.
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
8-7
8.3.1 Geometry
The standard timber size for pile caps is 14x14. The largest pile cap
timbers available are 16x16. Designers should use a maximum length
of 25 feet for cap timbers. This constraint will often require a splice in
the pile cap. If a splice is necessary, it should be located over an
internal pile.
8.3.2 Design /
Analysis
Design for a wet use condition (moisture content 19%+).

For design of the cap, assume that the railing weight is uniformly
distributed across the cap.
Use a horizontal shear modification factor (Ch) equal to 1.33.
When analyzing pile caps use three different models. Use a:
1) a simply supported span in determining the positive bending
moment,
2) a fixed-fixed span in determining the negative bending moment,
3) a continuous beam (with a hinge to represent a splice) in
determining the shear forces and reactions.
The third model requires the live load to be placed at various locations
along the span to determine the critical member forces.
8.3.3 Detailing
To prevent uplift and movements, pile caps must have positive

attachment to the piles (steel or timber).
8.3.4 Camber /
Deflections
Timber pile caps are not cambered.
8.4 Additional
References
Additional design information is available in the following references:

1) National Design Specifications Wood Construction (NDS)
2) Timber Construction Manual (AITC)
3) Ritter, M.A., Timber Bridges, Design, Construction, Inspection
and Maintenance, EM7700-B. Forest Service, U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Washington, D.C., 1990
4) National Conference on Wood Transportation Structures (NCWTS)
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
8-8
8.5 Design
Examples
8.5.1
Longitudinally
Laminated Timber
Deck Design
Example
[Figure 8.3.1]
[8.4.1.1]
This example demonstrates the design of a longitudinally spikelaminated timber bridge deck. There are no longitudinal girders in the
bridge, and it is noted that these bridge decks are usually reserved for
secondary roads with low truck traffic volumes. The deck panel span
under investigation is an interior strip of an intermediate span, which
spans from one pile cap to another pile cap - refer to Figure 8.5.1.1 for
general dimensions. In addition, Example 8.5.2 of this manual contains
the design of the accompanying timber pile cap.
A. Material and Design Parameters
The dimension annotations used throughout this design example are as
follows. The vertical thickness, or length, of a member is considered its
depth. The transverse and longitudinal measurements of a member are
considered its width and length, respectively.
These dimension
annotations are not consistent with Figure 8.3.1 of the 2000 AASHTO
LRFD Bridge Design Specifications.
1. Pile Cap
Assumed width of pile cap member = bcap = 16 in
Assumed depth of pile cap member = dcap = 16 in
Mn/DOT uses these dimensions as actual, not nominal. The pile cap
dimension validity is checked in Example 8.2.3 of this manual.
[9.9.8]
[3.4.1]
2. Bituminous Wearing Course

Average depth of wearing course = davg = 4 in
Depth of wearing course = dws = (1.5 / 1.25) x davg = 4.8 in 5.0 in
(Use 5-inches.)
Notice that the wearing course depth has been factored such that it can
be considered a DC load, instead of DW.
3. Curb and Railing [Glulam Rail (Type 1)]
Assumed width of timber curb = bcurb = 12 in
Assumed depth of timber curb = dcurb = 12 in
Assumed width of timber rail post = bpost = 8 in
Assumed length of timber rail post = Lpost = 12 in
Assumed depth of timber rail post = dpost = 34 in
Assumed width of timber rail = brail = 12 in
Assumed depth of timber rail = drail = 10.5 in
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
8-9
Spacing between barrier posts = spost = 6 ft = 72 in (maximum)

The timber barrier design is not a part of this design example, but the
dimensions are used for weight considerations.
[8.4.1.1, 9.9.2]
[8.4.1.1.2]
4. Deck Laminates / Planks

Assumed depth of timber deck panel laminates = dplank = 12 in
Assumed width of timber deck panel laminates or planks = bplank = 4 in
The standard Mn/DOT dimensions for visually-graded deck panel lumber
is 4 in X 12 in. These dimensions are used for dead loads and section
properties.
5. Span Lengths
Actual longitudinal length of deck panels, which is also the distance
between the centerlines of adjacent pile caps = L = 24.0 ft
Clear span length between pile caps = Lclr
16
L clr = L b cap = 24.0
= 22.67 ft
12
Effective longitudinal span length of deck panels = Le
1
1 16
L e = L clr + b cap = 22.67 +
= 23.11 ft
2
2 12
Maximum effective longitudinal span length of deck panels = Lmax
12
L max = L clr + dplank = 22.67 +
= 23.67 ft
12
Le = 23.11 ft Lmax = 23.67 ft
[Table 8.4.1.1.4-1]
[8.4.1.1.3]
(OK)
6. Unit Weights and Moisture Content

Type of deck panel wood material = Douglas Fir-Larch (No.1 & Better)
Unit weight of soft-wood = DFL = 0.050 kcf
Unit weight of bituminous wearing course = ws = 0.150 kcf
Moisture content of timber = MC = 19.0%
Mn/DOT designs for wet-use only - typically with a MC of 19%.
7. Douglas Fir-Larch Deck (No.1 & Better) Strength Properties
Base resistance of wood in flexure = Fbo = 3.20 ksi
Base resistance in compression perpendicular to grain = Fcpo =1.10 ksi
Modulus of elasticity = Eo = 1600 ksi
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
8-10
Figure 8.5.1.1 Timber Deck Layout

For clarity, the timber curb/railing on the near side and the bituminous
wearing course have been excluded from Figure 8.5.1.1.
Select the Basic

Configuration
The bridge deck consists of 5 interconnected deck panels, which are

oriented parallel to traffic. The laminate planks of each panel will be
connected using horizontal spikes. The panels are attached to each other
using vertical spikes through ship lap joints and transverse stiffener
beams also called spreader beams. The deck panel depth and spreader
beam sizes are based on deflection limits as well as strength
considerations. The spreader beams enable the deck to act as a single
unit under deflection. In addition, each deck panel span is designed as a
simply supported unit.
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
8-11
1. Deck Panel Widths

The deck panel sizes are given to clarify the sketches contained
throughout this example.
Width of bridge deck panel #1
Overall width of bridge deck =
= b1 = 7.33 ft
= b2 = 6.33 ft
= b3 = 6.67 ft
= b4 = 6.33 ft
= b5 = 7.33 ft
bbridge = (b#) = 34.0 ft
Width of each timber barrier = bbarrier = 1 ft

Width of roadway = brd = bbridge 2 x bbarrier = 34.0 2 x 1 = 32.0 ft
[9.9.6.3]
2. Spreader Beam Dimensions

Assumed width of spreader beams = bspdr = 6 in
Assumed depth of spreader beams = dspdr = 12 in
[9.9.4.3.1]
The standard size of the visually-graded spreader beam dimension

lumber is 6 X 12, which gives the required rigidity. The spreader
beams will be investigated later in this example.
Determine Dead
and Live Load
Bending Moments
A. Dead Loads per Unit Strip (1 ft)

The units for the dead load results are given in kips per longitudinal foot
per foot transverse strip (klf/ft). These units could also be given as kips
per square foot.
Weight. of deck = wdeck = DFL dplank = 0.050 x 12/12 = 0.050 klf/ft
Weight of wearing course = wws = wsdws = 0.150x5/12 = 0.0625 klf/ft
2
Area of spreader beam = Aspdr = dspdr bspdr = (12 x 6/12)/144= 0.5 ft

Spreader beam load = Pspdr = DFLAspdr = 0.050x0.5 = 0.025 kips/ft
3
Volume of timber curb per foot of bridge length = curb = 1728 in /ft
Volume of rail post per foot of bridge length = post
post = [bpost x Lpost x dpost] / spost
3
post = [8 x 12 x 34] / 72 = 544 in /ft
3
Volume of timber rail per foot of bridge length = rail = 1512 in /ft
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
8-12
Volume of timber railing per longitudinal foot of bridge length = barrier

barrier = curb + post + rail
3
3
barrier = 1728 + 544 + 1512 = 3784 in /ft = 2.19 ft /ft
Linear weight of combined timber curbs/railings = wbarrier
2 DFL barrier
2 0.050 2.19
wbarrier =
=
= 0.00644 klf
bbridge
34
This linear weight result assumes that the curb/railing weight acts
uniformly over the entire deck.
[AISC 2
nd
4-190]
B. Dead Load Bending Moments per Unit Strip (1 ft)

Maximum bending moment due to deck weight = Mdeck
Mdeck =
w deck (L e )2
50 23.112
kip ft
=
= 3.34
8
8
ft
Maximum bending moment due to wearing surface weight = Mws

Mws =
w ws (L e )2
0.0625 23.112
kip ft
=
= 4.17
8
8
ft
Maximum bending moment due to spreader beam weight = Mspdr

Pspdr L e
25 23.11
kip ft
Mspdr =
=
= 0.20
3
3
ft
Maximum bending moment due to curb/railing weight = Mbarrier
Mbarrier =
wbarrier (L e )2
6.44 23.112
kip ft
=
= 0.43
8
8
ft
Maximum bending moment due to bridge component dead loads = Mdc

Mdc = Mdeck + Mws + Mspdr + Mbarrier = 8.14 kipft/ft
[3.6.1.2]
C. Live Load Moments per Lane (12 ft)

The live load bending moment will be calculated per lane (12 ft) and
later converted to a per unit strip (1 ft) format.
JULY 2003
[3.6.1.2.2]
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
8-13
1. Design Truck Axle Loads

Point load of design truck axle = Ptruck = 32 kips
Ptruck = 32 kips
Le
Le = 23.11 ft
R1
[AISC 2nd 4-192]
[3.6.1.2.3]
R2
Maximum bending moment due to design truck axle load = Mtruck

P
Le
32 23.11
kip ft
Mtruck = truck
=
= 184.9
4
4
lane
2. Design Tandem Axle Loads
Point load of design tandem axle = Ptandem = 25 kips
Ptandem
a = 9.56 ft
[AISC 2nd 4-192]
[3.6.1.2.4]
Ptandem
4 ft
b = 9.56 ft
Maximum bending moment due to design tandem axle loads = Mtandem

kip ft
Mtan dem = Ptan dem a = 25 9.56 = 239
ft
3. Design Lane Loads
Uniform design lane load = wlane = 0.64 klf
wlane = 0.64 klf
Le = 23.11 ft
R1
R2
Maximum bending moment due to design lane load = Mlane

Mlane =
wlane (L e )2
0.64 23.112
kip ft
=
= 42.8
8
8
ft
JULY 2003
[4.6.2.3]
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
8-14
D. Live Load Equivalent Lane Strip Width

The live load bending moments, calculated above, will now be
distributed over the transverse equivalent lane distance (Em or Es).
CL of Bridge
Lane 1 = 12 ft
4 ft
4 ft
Lane 2 = 12 ft
2 ft
6 ft
P
2 ft
4 ft
6 ft
P
4 ft
Em = equivalent strip
id hmultiple lanes
for
l d d
Es = equivalent strip width for single lane
Physical edge-to-edge bridge deck width = W = bbridge = 34.0 ft

Le = 23.11 ft 60 ft
Therefore, modified span length = L1 = Le = 23.11 ft
[3.6.1.1.1]
Number of traffic lanes on the deck = NL

brd
32
NL =
=
= 2.67 2 lanes
ft
12
12
lane
[4.6.2.3-1]
1. Single Lane Loaded

W = bbridge = 34.0 ft > 30 ft
Therefore, the modified edge-to-edge bridge width for single lane load
case = W1 = 30 ft
Equivalent lane strip width for single lane loaded = Es
[4.6.2.3-2]
E s = 10 + 5.0 W1 L 1 = 10 + 5 30 23.11 = 141.65
in
ft
= 11.80
lane
lane
2. Multiple Lanes Loaded

W = bbridge = 34.0 ft 60 ft
Therefore, the modified edge-to-edge bridge width for multiple lanes
loaded case = W1 = 34.0 ft
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
8-15
Equivalent lane strip width for multiple lanes loaded = Em = lesser of

W
34.0
in
ft
= 12
= 204.0
= 17
Em = 12
NL
2
lane
lane
OR
Em = 84 +1.44 W1 L 1 = 84 +1.44 34.023.11 = 124.4
in
ft
= 10.36
lane
lane
Use Em = 124.4 in/lane = 10.36 ft/lane
[3.6.1.1.2, 4.6.2.3]
E. Modification of Live Bending Moment and Reactions

1. Multiple Presence Factors
The multiple presence factors cannot be used in conjunction with the
equivalent lane strip widths of 4.6.2.3. The multiple presence factors
have already been included in these equations.
2. Convert Live Load Bending Moments to Per Unit Strip
a. Single Lane Loaded Case
Es = 11.80 ft/lane
Maximum moment from one lane of design truck loads = Mtruck(s)
1
1
kip ft
= 184.9
= 15.7
Mtruck(s) = Mtruck
Es
11.80
ft
Maximum moment from one lane of design tandem loads = Mtandem(s)
1
1
kip ft
= 239.0
= 20.25
Mtan dem(s) = Mtan dem
Es
11.80
ft
Maximum moment from one design lane load case = Mlane(s)
1
1
kip ft
= 42.8
= 3.63
Mlane(s) = Mlane
Es
11.80
ft
b. Multiple Lanes Loaded Case
Em = 10.36 ft/lane
Maximum moment from two lanes of design truck loads = Mtruck(m)
1
1
kip ft
= 184.9
= 17.85
Mtruck(m) = Mtruck
Em
10.36
ft
Maximum moment from two lanes of design tandem loads = Mtandem(m)
1
1
kip ft
= 239.0
= 23.1
Mtan dem(m) = Mtan dem
Em
10.36
ft
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
8-16
Maximum moment from two design lane loads = Mlane(m)

1
1
kip ft
= 42.8
= 4.13
Mlane(m) = Mlane
Em
10.36
ft
F. Summary of Unfactored Dead and Live Load Bending Moments

for a Unit Strip (1 ft) of Deck
Table 8.5.1.1 - Applied Bending Moments
Maximum Positive Bending Moment
Unfactored Load Case
(kipft/ft)
Dead Loads
Bridge Components (Mdc)
7.86
Live Loads (Single Lane Loaded)

Design Truck
15.67
Design Tandem
20.25
Design Lane
3.63
Live Loads (Two Lanes Loaded)

Design Truck
17.85
Design Tandem
23.07
Design Lane
4.13
[3.6.2.3]
[Table 3.6.2.1-1]
G. Load and Resistance Factors

1. Load Factors and Load Limit States
Impact factor for timber components (reduced due to wood damping
1
properties) = IM = ( /2) x 33% = 16.5% = 0.165
[1.3.2]
[4.6.2.3]
Importance, redundancy, and ductility factors = = 1.0

Skew factor (bridge is not skewed thus 1.0) = = 1.0
Use the Strength I Limit State to determine the required resistance for
the deck panels.
[8.5.2.2]
2. Resistance Factors
Flexural resistance factor = f = 0.85
Compression perpendicular to grain resistance factor = cperp = 0.90
Investigate
Flexural Strength
Requirements
[8.5.2]
A. Strength I Limit State Bending Moment per Unit Strip (1 ft)

The earlier analysis showed that the tandem axle load controls the
bending moment of the deck panels. Additionally, the previous results
indicate that the live loads per unit strip are largest for the two lanes
loaded case. Therefore, use the two lanes loaded case of the tandem
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
8-17
axle loads with the uniform lane load in determining the critical live load
bending moment acting on the deck panels.
[Table 3.4.1-1]
Factored bending moment for two lanes loaded case = Mu(m)

Mu(m) = [1.25 Mdc + 1.75 [Mtan dem(m) (1 + IM) + Mlane(m) ]]
Mu(m) = 1.0 [1.258.14 + 1.751.0[23.07(1.165) + 4.13]] = 64.4
[8.4.4.3]
[8.4.4.2]
[Table 8.4.4.2-1]
[8.4.4.4]
[Table 8.4.4.4-1]
[8.6.2]
B. Deck Modification Factors

Moisture content factor for mechanically laminated deck lumber = Cm
Cm = 1.0
Size effect factor for sawn dimension lumber in flexure (Fbo) = Cf
dplank = 12 in
bplank = 4 in
Cf = 1.10
Deck factor for a mechanically laminated deck in flexure (Fbo) = Cd
bplank = 4 in
Cd = 1.15
Stability factor for sawn dimension lumber in flexure = Cs
Laminated deck planks are fully braced. Cs = 1.0
[8.4.4.1-1]
kip ft
ft
Flexural deck resistance = Fb = Fbo Cm Cf Cd

Fb = 3.20 x 1.0 x 1.10 x 1.15 = 4.05 ksi = 583.2 ksf
C. Deck Flexural Resistance

Required deck flexural resistance = Mn(req)
Mu(m) 64.4
kip ft
Mn(req) =
=
= 75.8
f
0.85
ft
Required section modulus of one foot of deck width = Sreq
Required depth of deck laminates (planks) = dreq
Sreq =
1 ft dreq2
6
Mn(req) = Fb Sreq
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
8-18
Substituting terms gives

dreq =
6 Mn(req)
Fb
6 75.8
= 0.88 ft = 10.6 in 12.0 in (OK)
583.2
The required deck panel depth (10.6 inches) indicates that the originally
assumed deck depth (12 inches) can be used. However, it is not
uncommon that a deeper section will be required to satisfy the deflection
limit.
Investigate
Deflection
Requirements
[3.6.1.3.2]
[2.5.2.6.2]
A. Deck Deflection with Current Deck Parameters

The midspan deflections are estimated with the design truck or 25% of
the design truck applied in conjunction with the design lane load.
Design for deflections using a per foot width approach.
Deflections are to be calculated using Service I Limit State. The impact
factor is to be included in determining the design truck deflection.
1. Deck Strengths
Moment of inertia of one foot width of deck panels = Iprov
1
1
Iprov =
b dplank 3 =
12 (12)3 = 1728 in4
12
12
[8.4.4.1-2]
Deck Panel modulus of elasticity with moisture considerations = E

E= Eo x Cm E = 1600 ksi x 1.0 = 1600 ksi
2. Loads per Unit Strip Width (1 ft)
Design truck load used for deflection calculations = Ptruck
Ptruck = [2 lanes of load x (1 + IM)] / bbridge
Ptruck = [(2 x 32 kips) x 1.165] / 34.0 ft = 2.19 kips/ft
Design lane load used for deflection calculations = wlane
wlane = 2 lanes of load / bbridge = 2 x 0.64 klf / 34.0 ft
= 0.0376 klf/ft
[3.6.1.3.2]
[AISC 2nd 4-192]
3. Deflection Calculations
Deflection at deck midspan due to the design truck load = truck
truck =
Ptruck L e3
2.19 (23.11 12)3
= 0.35 in
=
48 E Iprov
48 1600 1728
Deflection at deck midspan due to the design lane load = lane

0.0376
4
4
5
(23.11 12)
5 wlane L e
12
=
lane =
= 0.087 in
384 E Iprov
384 1600 1728
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
8-19
Deflection at deck midspan due to a combination of truck (25%) and

design lane loads = combined
combined = 0.25 x truck + lane = 0.25 x (0.35) + 0.087
combined = 0.175 in truck = 0.35 in
Therefore, the maximum deflection between the combination load
deflection and the truck load deflection = = truck = 0.35 in
[2.5.2.6.2]
[9.9.3.3]
Live load deflection limit at deck midspan = max

max = Le / 425 = 23.11/ 425 = 0.0544 ft = 0.63 in
= 0.35 in max = 0.63 in
(OK)
Deflections are okay. Thus, the initial 12-inch deck panel depth and
grade are adequate for deflection
Investigate Shear
Resistance
Requirements
[8.7, 9.9.3.2]
Shear need not be considered in the design of wood decks.
Investigate
Spreader Beam
Requirements
[9.9.6.3]
A. Spreader Beam Parameters

Maximum spreader beam spacing = smax = 8.0 ft
[9.9.4]
Minimum allowable rigidity (EI) of the spreader beams = rmin
Actual longitudinal spreader beam spacing = sspdr = L / 3 = 24 / 3 = 8.0

ft
sspdr = 8 ft smax = 8 ft
(OK)
rmin= 80,000 kipin
The spreader beams shall be attached to each deck panel near the panel
edges at intervals less than or equal to 15 inches. The spreader beams
reduce the relative panel deflection, thus decreasing wearing surface
cracking.
Required moment of inertia of spreader beams to accommodate the
specified rigidity = Imin
rmin = E Imin
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN

Imin =
8-20
rmin
80000
=
= 50 in4
E
1600
Required depth of spreader beam = dmin

1
Imin =
b d3
12
dmin =
12 Imin
=
b spdr
12 50
= 4.64 in dspdr = 12 in
6
(OK)
Mn/DOT standard practice is to use 6 in X 12 in spreader beams.
[9.9.6.1]
B. Spike Lamination Deck Pattern

Spike-laminated decks shall consist of a series of lumber laminations
that are placed edgewise between supports and spiked together on their
wide face with deformed spikes of sufficient length to fully penetrate
four laminations. The spikes shall be placed in lead holes that are bored
through pairs of laminations at each end and at intervals not greater
than 12.0 inches in an alternating pattern near the top and bottom of
the laminations.
Laminations shall not be butt spliced within their unsupported length.
Figure 8.5.1.2 Timber Deck to Cap Connections
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
8-21
[9.9.6.2, 9.9.4.2]
C. Deck Tie-Downs
5
Typically, Mn/DOT uses /8-inch diameter spikes to attach the metal tie3
down plates (brackets) to the deck panels, and /4-inch diameter spikes
are used to connect the plates to the pile cap. The plates are typically
3
1
/16 inch thick by 2 /2 inches wide X 2-6 long. These plates are
spaced at 3 feet maximum intervals transversely over the pile cap or
two plates per deck panel -the latter being more typical of Mn/DOT
designs.
Investigate
Bearing Strength
Requirements
A. Maximum Support Reactions per Unit Strip (1 ft)

1. Live Load Reactions
The maximum live load reactions need to be calculated. The design
truck and tandem axle loads have been oriented to produce the greatest
reaction at the pile cap. The design truck, tandem and lane reactions
are assumed to be uniformly distributed over the equivalent live load
strip width (Es or Em).
a. Multiple Lanes Loaded
The calculations below only consider the multiple lanes loaded case.
Because the equivalent lane strip width for multiple lanes is less than
that for the single lane loaded case (Em<Es), there is more force per
transverse foot for the multiple lane load case.
Maximum pile cap reaction due to the design truck loads = Rtruck
Ptruck
Ptruck
14.0 ft
Le = 23.11 ft
Rtruck
(L 14) 1
R truck = Ptruck + Ptruck e
Le
Em
(23.11 14)
1
kips
R truck = 32 + 32
= 4.31
23.11
ft
10.36
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
8-22
Maximum pile cap reaction due to the design tandem loads = Rtandem
Ptandem
Ptandem
4.0 ft
Le = 23.11 ft
Rtandem
(L 4) 1
R tan dem = Ptan dem + Ptan dem e
L e Em
(23.11 4)
1
kips
R tan dem = 25 + 25
= 4.41
23.11 10.36
ft
Maximum pile cap reaction due to the design lane load = Rlane
wlane = 0.64 klf
Le = 23.11 ft
Rlane
Rlane
L 1
w
1
kips
0.64 23.11
R lane = lane e
=
10.36 = 0.71 ft
2
E
2
2. Dead Load Reactions

Maximum reaction on pile cap due to the deck weight = Rdeck
w
Le
0.050 23.11
kip
R deck = deck
=
= 0.578
2
2
ft
Maximum reaction on pile cap due to the wearing surface weight = Rws
w
L
0.0625 23.11
kips
R ws = ws e =
= 0.722
2
2
ft
Maximum pile cap reaction due to spreader beam = Rspdr
Rspdr= 0.025 kips/ft
Maximum reaction on pile cap due to the curb/railing weight = Rbarrier
w
L
0.00644 23.11
kips
R barrier = barrier e =
= 0.074
2
2
ft
Maximum reaction on pile cap due to the dead loads = Rdc
Rdc = Rdeck + Rws + Rspdr + Rbarrier = 1.40 kips/ft
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
8-23
B. Summary of Unfactored Support Reactions

Table 8.5.1.2 Support Reactions
Maximum Support Reaction
(kips/ft)
Dead Loads (total)
1.35
Deck Panel
0.578
Spreader Beams
0.025
Curb/Railing
0.074
Wearing Surface
0.675
Live Loads (multiple lanes loaded)
[3.4.1]
Design Tandem Loads
4.41*
Design Truck Loads
4.31*
Design Lane Load
0.71*
Kips per transverse foot of the equivalent lane strip (Em)
C. Strength I Limit State Reaction per Unit Strip (1 ft)

Table 8.2.2.2 shows that the design tandem for the two lanes loaded
case controls the reaction of the deck panels. Therefore, the design
truck will be neglected for bearing calculations.
Maximum factored reaction when multiple lanes are loaded = Ru(m)
R u(m) = [1.25 R dc + 1.75 [R tan dem(m) (1 + IM) + R lane(m) ]]
R u(m) = 1.0 [1.25 1.40 + 1.75 1.0 [4.41 (1.165) + 0.71]] = 12.0
[8.8.3]
[Table 8.8.3-1]
kips
ft
D. Deck Bearing Resistance

1. Bearing Dimensions
Width of bearing = bb = 1 ft = 12 in (for unit strip)
Length of bearing = Lb = x bcap = x 14 = 7 in
2
Provided bearing area = Ab = bb x Lb = 12 x 7 = 84 in
2. Deck Modification Factors
Bearing modification factor = Cb
Lb = 7 in 6 in
Cb = 1.0
[8.4.4.3]
Moisture content factor for mechanically laminated deck lumber = Cm

Cm = 1.0
[Table 8.4.4.2-1]
The size effect factor (Cf) for sawn dimension lumber is not considered
for bearing design (Fcpo).
JULY 2003
[8.4.4.4]
[8.4.4.1-1]
[8.8.3-1]
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
8-24
The deck factor (Cd) for mechanically laminated dimension lumber is not
considered for bearing design (Fcpo).
3. Deck Resistance Calculations
Nominal resistance in compression perpendicular to grain = Fcp
Fcp = Fcpo x Cm = 1.10 x 1.0 = 1.10 ksi
Nominal resistance of deck in compression perp. to the grain = Pn
Pn = Fcp x Ab x Cb = 1.10 x 84 in2 x 1.0 = 92.4 kips
Factored resistance of deck in compression perp. to the grain = Pn
Pn = cperp x Pn = 0.90 x 92.4 kips = 83.2 kips
Pn = 83.2 kips Ru(m) = 12.0 kips
(OK)
There is no need for a sill plate at the bearing because the given bearing
strength is more than adequate.
Summary of
Connection Design
Figure 8.5.1.3 below indicates the position of the spreader beam

connections, the ship lap joints (deck panel-to-deck panel connections),
and deck panel-to-pile cap tie-down plates. Use Mn/DOT standard
practices for the design of these connections.
[9.9.6.3]
[8.4.2.2.1]
[8.4.2.2.5]
The maximum spacing of the spreader beam connection spikes is 15

inches, and they shall be placed near the panel edges.
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 8.5.1.3 Timber Deck Partial Plan View
8-25
JULY 2003
8.5.2 Design
Example: Timber
Pile Cap
[Figure 8.3.1]
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
8-26
This example demonstrates the design of a typical spliced timber pile

cap, which accompanies the deck design of example 8.5.1. The bridge
contains no longitudinal girders; the dead and live loads are uniformly
spread along the pile cap. It shall be noted that these types of bridges
are usually reserved for secondary roads with low truck traffic volumes.
A. Material and Design Parameters
The dimension annotations used throughout this design example are as
follows. The vertical thickness of a member is considered its depth. The
transverse and longitudinal dimensions of a member are considered its
width and length, respectively. These dimension labels differ from the
2000 AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, which can be found in
Figure 8.3.1.
[8.4.1.1]
1. Pile Cap
Initial timber pile cap width = bcap = 16 in = 1.33 ft
Initial timber pile cap depth = dcap = 16 in = 1.33 ft
[8.4.1.1.2]
The largest available size for visually-graded beam lumber is 16 X 16,

for lengths up to 25 feet. Use these as actual dimensions, not nominal.
[9.9.8]
2. Wearing Course
Average depth of wearing course = davg = 4 in
Depth of wearing course = dws = (1.5 / 1.25) davg = 4.8 in 5.0 in
(Use 5-inches.)
Notice that the wearing course depth has been factored such that it can
be considered a DC load, instead of DW.
[Mn/DOT
5-397.146]
3. Curb and Railing [Glulam Rail (Type 1)]

Width of timber curb = bcurb = 12 in
Depth of timber curb = dcurb = 12 in
Width of timber rail post = bpost = 8 in
Thickness of timber rail post = tpost = 12 in
Depth (height) of timber rail post = dpost = 34 in
Width of timber rail = brail = 12 in
Thickness of timber rail = trail = 12 in
Depth (height) of timber rail = drail = 10.5 in
The timber barrier design is not a part of this design example, but the
dimensions are used for weight considerations. The maximum spacing
for the timber rail posts is 6.0 ft.
JULY 2003
[8.4.1.1]
[9.9.2]
[8.4.1.1.2]
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
8-27
4. Deck Planks
Depth of timber deck panel laminates or planks = dplank = 12 in = 1 ft
Width of timber deck panel laminates or planks = bplank = 4 in = 0.33 ft
The standard MNDOT dimensions for visually-graded deck panel lumber
are 4 X 12. These dimensions are used for dead loads and section
properties. The adequacy of the timber deck, for this example, has been
verified in example 8.5.1.
5. Piles
Diameter of circular timber piles = dpile = 12 in
Number of piles = npiles = 6
It is standard MNDOT practice to use equally spaced 12 in or 14 in
diameter piles.
6. Span Lengths
Overall transverse length of pile caps = Ltrans = 36 ft
Transverse combined width of deck panels = bbridge = 34.0 ft
Longitudinal distance between pile cap centerlines = L = 24 ft
Transverse distance between centerlines of piles = Lcap = 6.5 ft
Transverse clear distance between adjacent piles = Lclr = 5.5 ft
The pile cap is spliced over an interior pile. This is necessary because
the maximum available beam length is 25 feet.
[Table 8.4.1.1.4-1]
7. Unit Weights and Moisture Content

Type of pile cap wood material = Douglas Fir-Larch Beam and Stringer
(Dense Structural Select)
[3.5.1]
Unit weight of soft wood (Douglas Fir-Larch) = DFL = 0.050 kcf

Unit weight of bituminous wearing course = ws = 0.150 kcf
[8.4.1.1.3]
Moisture content of timber = MC = 19.0%

MNDOT designs for wet-use only typically with a MC of 19%.
8. Douglas Fir-Larch Beam & Stringer (Dense ) Strength

Properties
Base resistance of wood in flexure = Fbo = 5.3 ksi
Base resistance in horizontal shear = Fvo = 0.25 ksi
Base resistance in compression perpendicular to grain = Fcpo = 1.30 ksi
Modulus of elasticity = Eo = 1700 ksi
JULY 2003
Select the Basic
Configuration
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
8-28
The bridge deck will consist of 5 interconnected longitudinal deck panels.

The deck panels are supported by timber pile caps, which span the width
of the bridge. Each timber pile cap contains a splice located over an
interior pile support. See the timber deck example 8.5.1 for details
regarding the deck design and connection configurations.
Figure 8.5.2.1
Determine Dead
and Live Load
Reactions, Shear
Forces, and
Bending Moments
A. Determine Dead Loads

The dead load units are given in pounds per linear foot of pile cap
length.
Area of pile cap cross section = Acap
2
2
Acap= dcap bcap = 16 16 = 256 in = 1.78 ft
Linear weight of timber pile cap = wcap
wcap= DFL Acap = 0.050 1.78 = 89.0 lbs/ft
Linear weight of deck panels = wdeck
wdeck = DFL dplank L = 0.050 1.0 24 = 1.20 kips/ft
Linear weight of bituminous wearing course = wws
wws = ws dws L = 0.150 5.0 (1/12)24 = 1.50 kips/ft
Area of spreader beam = Aspdr
2
Aspdr= dspdr bspdr = 12 6 = 72 in2 = 0.5 ft
Linear weight of spreader beams = wspdr
wspdr = 2 Aspdr DFL = 2 0.5 0.050 = 0.050 kips/ft
JULY 2003
[Mn/DOT
5-397.146]
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
8-29
Volume of curb/railing per longitudinal foot of bridge length = barrier

3
barrier = 2.19 ft /ft
Weight of timber barrier per longitudinal foot of bridge length = wbarrier
(2 DFL barrier )
kips
(2 0.050 2.19
wbarrier =
L =
24 = 0.146 ft
L
36
.
0
trans
This linear load assumes that the barrier weight acts uniformly over the
entire pile cap length.
Linear dead load acting along the pile cap = wdc
w dc = w cap + w deck + w ws + w spdr + wbarrier
w dc = 0.089 + 1.20 + 1.50 + 0.050 + 0.146 = 2.99
kips
ft
B. Coordinates and Structural Analysis Models

1. Span Coordinate Numbering Method
The figure below illustrates the numbering of the "coordinates" for each
pile cap span. Pile cap span 1 starts at number 1.0 and runs to 2.0-.
The left digit (1) indicates the span number, and the right decimal digit
designates the tenth of the span. The positive or negative sign following
the tenths digit indicates the support side under analysis.
This
numbering technique is helpful in using influence line charts and
presenting where maximum member forces occur. The remainder of
this design utilizes this numbering technique to show the location of
critical shear forces and reactions.
LABELING OF SPAN TENTH POINTS
0.0 1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
-+
-+
- +
-+
- +
Pile Cap Splice
Pile Support
5.6
-+
6.0 7.0
-+
Pile Cap
Notice that the pile cap is spliced above an interior pile. This affects the
continuity of the pile cap. The pile cap is made up of a two and three
span continuous beam.
2. Analysis Models
In determining the maximum member forces, MNDOT uses a variation of
beam models as follows:
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
8-30
1) The maximum shear forces and reactions are determined by

modeling the pile cap as a spliced five span simply-supported
beam, such as the one shown above. Moving live loads are then
placed at various locations along the span, to produce the
maximum shear and reactions. This method of analysis allows
the effects of adjacent spans to be investigated.
2) The maximum positive bending moments (tension on pile cap
bottom) are determined by considering the pile cap as a single
simply-supported span.
3) The maximum negative bending moments (tension on pile cap
top) are determined by considering the pile cap as a single fixedfixed span.
The dead and live load shear, reaction and bending moment results can
be determined using a basic structural analysis computer program, or
using the standard beam formulas found in AISC 2nd Edition LRFD
Manual (4-188 to 4-206).
C. Dead Load Reaction, Shear, and Bending Moment Results
The dead load member end forces are determined using the models
shown below.
1. Maximum Reaction and Shear Force
Critical dead load shear acting on the pile cap = Vdc(5.0-) = 12.1 kips
Critical dead load reaction along the pie cap = Rdc(2.0) = 24.2 kips
Pile Cap
wdc
2. Maximum Positive Bending Moment

Critical positive dead load bending moment = Mdc(pos)
wdc
Mdc = wdc (Lcap)

8
Simple Pile Cap Span
Lcap = 6.5 ft
Mdc(pos) =
w dc (L cap )2
8
2.99 6.52
= 15.8 kip ft
8
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
8-31
3. Maximum Negative Bending Moment

Critical negative dead load bending moment = Mdc(neg)
wdc
Fixed-Fixed Pile Cap Span
Lcap = 6.5 ft
Mdc = wdc (Lcap)
12
Mdc(neg) =
w dc (L cap )2
12
2.99 6.52
= 10.5 kip ft
12
[3.6.1.2]
[4.6.2.3]
D. Live Load Shear, Reaction and Bending Moment Results

The multiple presence factors cannot be used in conjunction with the
equivalent lane strip widths (Es and Em) determined in example 8.5.1.
Assume the design truck, tandem, and lane loads are applied
transversely over these equivalent lane strip widths.
[Design Example
8.5.1]
Equivalent lane strip width for single lane loaded = Es = 11.86 ft

Equivalent lane strip width for multiple lanes loaded = Em = 10.38 ft
[3.6.1.2.2]
1. One Lane Loaded

a. Design Truck Axle Loads
Point load of design truck axle = Ptruck = 32 kips
Linear design truck load acting along pile cap for the single lane load
case (Es) = wtruck(s)
(L 14)
(24 14)
32 + 32
Ptruck + Ptruck
L
24
kips
=
w truck(s) =
= 3.82
Es
11.86
ft
Maximum design truck shear force = Vtruck(5.0-) = 15.9 kips
Maximum design truck reaction = Rtruck(2.0) = 30.3 kips
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
8-32
Maximum design truck positive bending moment = Mtruck(pos)

Mtruck(pos) =
w truck(s) (L cap )2
8
3.82 6.52
= 20.2 kip ft
8
Es
wtruck(s)
Pile Cap
Maximum design truck negative bending = Mtruck(neg)

Mtruck(neg) =
w truck(s) (L cap )2
12
3.82 6.52
= 13.45 kip ft
12
Maximum design truck (single lane load case) = Mtruck(s)

Mtruck(s)= Mtruck(pos) = 20.2 kipft
[3.6.1.2.3]
b. Design Tandem Axle Loads

Point load of design tandem axle = Ptandem = 25.0 kips
Linear design tandem load acting along pile
case (Es)= wtandem(s)
(L 4)
Ptan dem + Ptan dem L

=
w tan dem(s) =
Es
cap for the single lane load

(24 4)
25 + 25 24
= 3.86 kip
11.86
ft
Maximum design tandem shear force = Vtandem(5.0-) = 16.1 kips

Maximum design tandem reaction force = Rtandem(2.0) = 30.65 kips
Maximum design tandem positive bending moment = Mtandem(pos)
Mtan dem(pos) =
w tan dem(s) (L cap )2

8
3.86 6.52
= 20.4 kip ft
8
Maximum design tandem negative bending moment = Mtandem(neg)

Mtan dem(neg) =
w tan dem(s) (L cap )2

12
3.86 6.52
= 13.6 kip ft
12
Maximum design tandem (single lane load case) = Mtandem(s)

Mtandem(s)= Mtandem(pos) = 20.4 kipft
JULY 2003
[3.6.1.2.4]
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
8-33
c. Design Lane Load

Uniform design lane load = wlane = 0.64 klf
Linear design lane load acting along pile cap for the single lane load case
(Es) = wlane(s)
[wlane L ] = [0.64 24] = 1.3 kip
wlane(s) =
Es
11.86
ft
Maximum design lane shear force = Vlane(5.0-) = 5.42 kips
Maximum design lane reaction force = Rlane(2.0) = 10.32 kips
Maximum design lane positive bending moment = Mlane(pos)
Mlane(pos) =
wlane(s) (L cap )2
8
1.3 6.52
= 6.67 kip ft
8
Es
wlane(s)
Pile Cap
Maximum design lane negative bending moment= Mlane(neg)

Mlane(neg) =
wlane(s) (L cap )2
12
1.3 6.52
= 4.58 kip ft
12
Maximum design lane (single lane load case) = Mlane(s)

Mlane(s)= Mlane(pos) = 6.67 kipft
2. Multiple Lanes Loaded
Linear design truck load acting along pile cap for the multiple lane load
case (Em) = wtruck(m)
(24 24)
(L 14)
32 + 32
Ptruck + Ptruck
L
24
=
= 4.37 kip
w truck(m) =
Em
10.38
ft
Maximum design truck shear force = Vtruck(5.0-) = 20.35 kips
Maximum design truck reaction force = Rtruck(2.0) = 32.9 kips
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
8-34
Maximum design truck positive bending moment = Mtruck(pos)

Mtruck(pos) =
w truck(m) (L cap )2
8
4.37 6.52
= 23.1 kip ft
8
Em
wtruck(m)
Pile Cap
Maximum design truck negative bending moment = Mtruck(neg)

Mtruck(neg) =
w truck(m) (L cap )2
12
4.37 6.52
= 15.4 kip ft
12
Maximum design truck (multiple lane loaded case) = Mtruck(m)

Mtruck(m)= Mtruck(pos) = 23.1 kipft

Linear design tandem load acting along pile cap for the multiple lane
load case (Em) = wtandem(m)
(L 4)
(24 4)
Ptan dem +Ptan dem L 25+25 24

=
= 4.42 kip
w tan dem(m) =
Em
10.38
ft
Maximum design tandem shear force = Vtandem(5.0-) = 20.4 kips
Maximum design tandem reaction force = Rtandem(2.0) = 33.0 kips
Maximum design tandem positive bending moment = Mtandem(pos)
Mtan dem(pos) =
w tan dem(m) (L cap )2

8
4.42 6.52
= 23.3 kip ft
8
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
8-35
Es
w tru c k (s )
P ile C a p
Maximum design tandem negative bending moment = Mtandem(neg)

Mtan dem(neg) =
Wtan dem(m) (L cap )2

12
4.42 6.52
= 15.6 kip ft
12
Maximum design tandem (multiple lane load case) = Mtandem(m)

Mtandem(m)= Mtandem(pos) = 23.34 kipft
c. Design Lane Load

Linear design lane load acting along pile cap for the multiple lane load
case (Em) = wlane(m)
w
L (0.64) (24)
kips
wlane(m) = lane
=
= 1.48
Em
10.38
ft
Maximum design lane shear force = Vlane(5.0-) = 6.89 kips
Maximum design lane reaction force = Rlane(2.0) = 11.14 kips
Maximum design lane positive bending moment = Mlane(pos)
M lane (pos)=
w lane (m) (L cap )2

(1.48) (6.5)2
=
= 7.82 kip-ft
8
8
Maximum design lane negative bending moment = Mlane(neg)

M lane (neg)=
w lane (m) (L cap )2

(1.48) (6.5)2
=
= 5.21 kipft
12
12
Maximum design lane (multiple lane load case) = Mlane(m)

Mlane(m)= Mlane(pos) = 7.82 kipft
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
8-36
E.
Summary of Shear Force, Reaction and Bending Moment

Results
Table 8.5.2.1
Maximum
Maximum
Positive
Negative
Maximum
Maximum
Bending
Bending
Shear
Support
Moment
Moment
Force
Reaction
(kipft)
(kipft)
(kips)
(kips)
15.79
10.53
12.09
24.18
Design Truck
20.17
13.45
15.94
30.33
Design Tandem
20.39
13.59
16.11
30.65
6.67
4.58
5.42
10.32
Design Truck
23.08
15.39
20.35
32.90
Design Tandem
23.34
15.56
20.38
32.97
7.28
5.21
6.89
11.14
Dead Loads
Single Lane Loaded
Design Lane
Multiple Lanes Loaded
Design Lane
The live load member force results indicate that the flexural, shear, and
compression designs are controlled by the multiple lanes loaded with the
design tandem and lane loads. Hence, the remainder of this example
will deal exclusively with this load case.
[3.6.2.3]
[Table 3.6.2.1-1]
F. Load and Resistance Factors

1. Load Factors
Impact factor for timber components (reduced due to wood damping
1
properties) = IM = /2 33% = 16.5% = 0.165
[1.3.2]
[4.6.2.3-3]
Importance, redundancy, and ductility factors = = 1.0

Skew factor = = 1.0
a. Load Limit States
Use the Strength I Limit State to determine the required resistance of
the pile caps.
2. Resistance Factors
Flexural resistance factor = f = 0.85
Shear resistance factor = v = 0.75
Compression perpendicular to grain resistance factor = cperp = 0.90
JULY 2003
Investigate
Flexural Strength
Requirements
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
8-37
A. Factored Bending Moments Acting on Pile Cap

The previous results indicate that multiple lanes loaded with the design
tandem and lane loads control for flexure.
1. Strength I Limit State Positive Moment
Positive (tension on pile cap bottom) bending moment due to multiple
lanes load under ultimate strength loads = Mu(m)
Mu(m) = [1.25 Mdc + 1.75 [Mtandem(m) (1 + 1M) + Mlane(m) ]]
M
= 1.0 [1.25 (15.79) + 1.75 1.0 [(23.34) (1.165) + 7.28]]
u(m)
Mu(m) = 80.1 kip ft
2. Required Flexural Resistance of Pile Cap

Required pile cap flexural resistance = Mn(req)
Mu(m) 80.06
kip ft
=
= 94.2
Mn(req) =
f
0.85
ft
[8.4.4.3]
B. Determine Flexural Resistance of Pile Cap

1. Pile Cap Modification Factors
Moisture content factor for beam lumber = Cm
Cm = 1.0
[8.4.4.2]
Size effect factor for sawn beam lumber in flexure (Fbo) = Cf

dcap = 16 in 12.0 in
1/9
Cf = (12 / dcap)
= 0.97
[8.6.2]
Stability factor for sawn beam lumber in flexure (Fbo) = Cs

bcap = 16 in dcap = 16 in
Cs = 1.0
[8.4.4.1-1]
2. Nominal Flexural Resistance

Pile cap flexural resistance = Fb = Fbo Cm Cf Cs
Fb = 5.3 1.0 0.97 1.0 = 5.14 ksi
3. Provided Flexural Resistance
Provided pile cap section modulus = Sprov
1
2
1
3
Sprov = ( /6) [bcap (dcap) ] = ( /6) [16 (16)2] = 682.7 in
[8.6.2-1]
Provided pile cap flexural resistance = Mn(prov)

Mn(prov) = Fb Sprov = 5.14 682.67
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
8-38
= 3508.93 kipin = 292.4 kipft

Mn(req) 1 ft = (94.19) 1 = 94.2 kipft
Mn(prov) = 292.4 kipft Mn(req) = 94.2 kipft
(OK)
Additional calculations indicate that the minimum required pile cap depth
is 9.1 inches, for flexure. However, it is not uncommon that a deeper
section will be required to satisfy shear.
Investigate Shear
Resistance
Requirements
[8.7]
A. Critical Shear Force Location

For components other than decks, shear shall be investigated at a
distance away from the face of the support equal to the depth of the
component. When calculating the maximum design shear, the live load
shall be placed as to produce the maximum shear at a distance from the
support equal to the lessor of either three times the depth of the
component (dcap) or one-quarter of the span (Lcap). The placement of
the live load is more critical when it is applied as axle point loads, rather
than the uniform load used in this example and in typical Mn/DOT
designs.
Distance away from the support, where the live load is placed = dlive =
lesser of
3 dcap = 3 16 in = 48.0 in
OR
Lcap / 4 = 6.5 ft / 4 = 19.5 in
Therefore, dlive = 19.5 in = 1.625 ft
1
Position to check for shear = [dcap + /2 dpile]/ Lcap

1
= [1.33 ft + /2 1 ft] / 6.5 ft
Check for shear at 28% of span length away from the support
centerlines.
Horizontal shear must be checked for components other than decks.
The term "horizontal" shear is typically used in wood design, because a
shear failure initiates along the grain. This shear failure is typically
along the horizontal axis. The shear stress is equal in magnitude in the
vertical direction, but inherent resistance is greater, and is not of
concern.
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
8-39
Figure 8.5.2.2
B. Unfactored Shear Forces Acting on Pile Cap
These shear forces are less than those listed in the earlier table (page
13). The results given below are not the maximum shear forces.
Rather, they are the maximums taken at the appropriate distance "dcap"
from the critical support face. The following shear forces were taken at
span coordinate 4.72 (72% point of span number 4).
1. Dead Load Shear Force
Maximum dead load shear force at a distance "dcap" away from the
support face = Vdc(m) = 6.26 kips
2. Live Load Shear Forces (Multiple Lanes Loaded)
Only the design tandem and lane loads, for the multiple lanes loaded
case, are shown below. From the earlier results, this is the load case
that produces the maximum shear force.
Maximum design truck shear forces at a distance "dcap" away from the
support = Vtruck(m) = 11.15 kips
Maximum design tandem shear forces at a distance "dcap" away from
the support = Vtandem(m) = 11.17 kips
c. Design Lane Load
Maximum design lane shear force at a distance "dcap" from the support
= Vlane(m) = 3.78 kips
JULY 2003
[3.4.1]
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
8-40
C. Factored Shear Force Acting on Pile Cap

Strength I Limit State shear force for two lanes loaded case = Vu(m)
Vu(m) = [1.25 Vdc + 1.75 [Vtan dem(m) (1 + IM) + Vlane(m) ]]
Vu(m) = 1.0 [1.25 (6.26) + 1.75 1.0 [11.2 (1.165) + 3.78]] = 37.2 kips
Required pile cap shear resistance = Vn(req)

Vu(m)
37.2
Vn(req) =
=
= 49.6 kips
v
0.75
[8.4.4.3]
D. Determine Shear Resistance of Pile Cap

Horizontal shear factor = Ch = 1.33
(MNDOT Standard Practice)
Moisture content factor = Cm = 1.0
[Table 8.4.1.1.4-1]
2. Nominal Shear Resistance

Horizontal shear resistance (DFL Dense Select Struct.) = Fvo = 0.25 ksi
Specified resistance of wood in shear = Fv
Fv = Fvo Ch Cm Cf = 0.25 1.33 1.0 = 0.33 ksi
[8.7-2]
3. Provided Shear Resistance

Required factored shear resistance of pile cap cross-section = Vn(prov)
(Fv b cap dcap ) (0.33 16 16)
=
= 56.3 kips
Vn(prov) =
1.5
1.5
Vn(req) = 49.61 kips Vn(prov) = 56.32 kips
Investigate
Compression
Resistance
Requirements
[8.8.3]
(OK)
A. Unfactored Support Reactions Acting on the Pile Cap

The maximum support reactions are listed in the earlier table (page 13).
These reactions are taken from span coordinate 2.0.
1. Dead Load Reaction Force
Maximum dead load reaction force = Rdc(2.0) = 24.2 kips
2. Live Load Reaction Forces (Multiple Lanes Loaded)
Only the design tandem and lane load reactions, for the multiple lanes
loaded case, are shown below. From the earlier results, this is the load
case that produces the maximum reaction forces.
Maximum design truck reaction force = Rtruck(m) = 32.9 kips
JULY 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
8-41

Maximum design tandem reaction force = Rtandem(m) = 33.0 kips
c. Design Lane Load
Maximum design lane reaction force = Rlane(m) = 11.1 kips
[3.4.1]
B. Factored Support Reactions Acting on Pile Cap

Maximum factored reaction due to two lanes loaded case = Pu(m)
Pu(m) = [1.25 R dc + 1.75 [R tan dem(m) (1 + IM) + R lane(m) ]]
Pu(m) = 1.0 [1.25 (24.2) + 1.75 1.0 [33.0 (1.165) + 11.1]] = 116.9 kips
Required pile cap compression resistance = Pn(req)

Pu(m)
116.94
=
= 129.9 kips
Pn(req) =
cperp
0.90
C. Determine Compression Resistance of Pile Cap

1. Pile Cap Bearing Dimensions
Bearing length = Lb = dpile = 6 in
Bearing width = bb = dpile = 6 in
2
2
Bearing Area = Ab = [ (dpile) ] / 4 = [ (12) ] / 4 = 113 in2
[Tbl 8.8.3-1]
[8.4.4.3]
[Tbl 8.4.1.1.4-1]
[8.8.3-1]

Bearing modification factor = Cb
Lb = 6.0 in 6.0 in
Cb =1.0
Moisture content factor = Cm = 1.0
3. Nominal Bearing Resistance
Compression resistance parallel to grain = Fcpo =1.30 ksi
Specified resistance of wood in compression = Fcp
Fcp = Fcpo Cm Cf Cd Cb = 1.30 1.0 1.0 = 1.30 ksi
4. Provided Bearing Resistance
Provided compression resistance perpendicular to grain = Pn(prov)
Pn(prov) = Fcp Ab = 1.30 113 in2 = 146.9 kips
5. Bearing Resistance Check
Pn(req) = 129.9 kips Pn(prov) = 146.9 kips
(OK)
The provided bearing resistance is greater than the required strength.
DECEMBER 2004
9. DECKS AND
DECK SYSTEMS
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
9-1
Reinforced concrete decks on girders are the predominant type of deck

used on highway bridges in Minnesota. The deck is the structural
element that transfers vehicle and pedestrian loads to the girders. It is
analyzed as a continuous beam with the girders acting as supports. The
top and bottom primary moment resisting steel runs transversely in the
deck. The stool between the beam top flange and the deck bottom varies
to allow placement of the deck to the proper elevation.
Timber decks may be used on secondary roads and temporary bridges as
part of the superstructure. Guidance for the design of timber decks is
provided in Section 8.
Specialized deck systems are used for railroad bridges. A common
design is a thru-girder system with floor beams supporting a bent plate.
This channel shaped bent plate holds the ballast on which the rails are
supported. These specialized deck systems are not currently covered in
this manual.
9.1 General
Deck Protection Policy

The following practices are used to extend the service life of new
concrete bridge decks:
All reinforcement bars shall be epoxy coated. Also, use epoxy
coated reinforcement when widening a bridge or when adding a
new railing.
The top reinforcing bars shall have a total of 3 inches of cover.
Primary bridges shall be constructed with a 2 inch low slump
concrete wearing course.
Primary bridges are defined as:
All bridges carrying interstate traffic.
All interstate highway bridges at an interchange with access to the
interstate route.
All bridges carrying trunk highway traffic within major
metropolitan areas and municipalities with populations of 5,000 or
greater.
All bridges on highways with a 20 year projected ADT greater than
2,000.
The State Bridge Engineer shall determine the appropriate action on any
exceptions to this policy.
DECEMBER 2004
9.1.1 Deck
Drainage
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
9-2
Deck Drainage Considerations

The design of a deck requires:
Removing potential hydroplaning water from the driving surface
using a crown cross-section.
Channeling drainage water away from the bridge and features
below the bridge using road grades and end slopes respectively.
Superstructure Drains
Drain outlets shall be avoided over roadways, shoulders, sidewalks,
streams, railroad tracks, or end slopes. Drains placed over riprap will
require the area to be grouted, or a grouted flume section provided. At
down spouts or deck drains provide splash blocks.
Avoid drainage details that include flat elements (grades less than 5%).
Pipes and drainage elements with flat profiles tend to collect debris and
plug.
Drainage systems shall avoid direct runoff to waters of the State.
Bridges over lakes or streams, where bridge length is less than 500 feet,
shall be designed such that deck drains are not necessary. Narrow
bridges that are longer than 500 feet may have problems with deck
flooding in severe rainstorms. Discuss this issue with the Hydraulics Unit
prior to beginning final design.
Also note that special drainage requirements are necessary for bridges
where a Corps of Engineers 404 permit is required. The Hydraulics
Unit may also require the addition of containment and treatment features
to the project for bridges located in or near scenic waterways or near
public water supply sources.
The materials and gages for corrugated metal (C.M.) drains, and semicircle deck drains, such as those used on railroad bridges, are to be
provided in the plan details. Use 16 gage metal for other C.M. drains.
Drains shall extend a minimum of 1 inch below the bottom of
superstructure. See Standard Bridge Detail B701, B702, B705, or B706.
9.2 Concrete Deck

on Beams
Figure 9.2.1 illustrates the two most common concrete deck systems
used. The deck system selected is based on the protection policy. The
left side of the figure shows a deck constructed with a single concrete
pour. The right side illustrates a deck with a wearing course.
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
9-3
Figure 9.2.1
DECEMBER 2004
DECEMBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
9-4
The wearing course is less permeable and consequently reduces the rate
at which chlorides penetrate into the deck.
9.2.1 Deck Design

and Detailing
Design
The traditional approximate method of analysis shall be used in deck
design.
Do not use the empirical deck design method shown in
LRFD 9.7.2. The deck shall be treated as a continuous beam. Moments
as provided in LRFD Table A4.1-1 are to be applied at the design sections
shown in Figure 9.2.1. The use of LRFD Table A4.1-1 must be within the
assumptions and limitations listed at the beginning of the appendix.
Tables 9.2.1.1 and 9.2.1.2 provide minimum reinforcement requirements
based on the traditional deck design method for decks supported on
prestressed concrete beams and steel beams, respectively. The tables
may be used for all LRFD deck designs that fit the assumptions, as well
as for decks of bridges designed by the Load Factor method (curved steel
bridges or bridge widenings).
The transverse reinforcement given in Tables 9.2.1.1 and 9.2.1.2 is
adequate for deck overhangs (measured from centerline of beam to edge
of deck) up to 40% of the beam spacing when a Type F concrete barrier,
which meets Test Level 4 (Standard Details Part II Figures 5-397.114
through 5-397.117) is used.
[6.10.1.7]
The amount of longitudinal steel placed in decks is increased in the

negative moment regions over the piers. The amount of steel must be
consistent with the superstructure modeling assumptions. If precast
beams are made continuous over the piers an appropriate amount of
reinforcement must be included in the deck to provide adequate negative
moment capacity. Similarly for steel beams, the amount of longitudinal
reinforcement must be consistent with the design section property
assumptions.
For steel beam or girder superstructures, the LRFD
specifications require at least one percent reinforcing over the piers. See
Figure 9.2.1.7 for additional information.
The design of the distribution steel for the entire bridge shall be based on
the widest beam spacing found in any span.
The top longitudinal steel in non-pier areas shall satisfy the requirements
for shrinkage and temperature reinforcement.
For skews less than or equal to 20, detail deck reinforcement parallel to
the skew. Design the reinforcement taking into account the skew.
DECEMBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
9-5
For skews greater than 20, provide reinforcing at right angles to the
centerline of roadway.
Overhangs are to be designed to meet the strength requirements of
Section 13. LRFD A13.4.2 specifies that the vehicle collision force to be
used in deck overhang design is to be equal to the rail capacity R w . This
ensures that the deck will be stronger than the rail and that the yield line
failure mechanism will occur in the parapet. For example, the TL-4 F-rail
has a capacity R w = 128.0 kips (see Section 13.3.1), which is well above
the rail design collision force Ft = 54 kips for a Test Level 4 railing.
Because of the large difference between rail capacity and collision force,
Mn/DOT requires the deck overhang to carry the lesser of the rail
capacity R w or 4/3 x Ft .
Geometry
Figures 9.2.1.2 through 9.2.1.5 contain standard Mn/DOT deck details.
Typical deck reinforcement layouts at deck edges and medians are
illustrated in the figures.
Use a uniform deck thickness for all spans based on the minimum
thickness required for the widest beam spacing.
The main transverse reinforcement will vary with the beam spacing. For
skewed bridges, continue the reinforcement for the wider beam spacing
until the reinforcement is completely outside of the span with the wider
beam spacing.
The standard height of bridge sidewalks is 8 inches above the top of
roadway. Bridge medians shall match approach roadway median shape
and height.
Use a uniform thickness for the edge of deck in all spans. Use a 9 inch
minimum thickness on structures without a wearing course. Use an
8 inch minimum thickness on bridges with a wearing course or sidewalk.
Dimension the bottom of deck on the outside of the fascia beam at 1 inch
below the top of the beam for prestressed concrete beams. For steel
beams, detail the bottom of deck on the outside of the fascia beam to
meet the bottom of the top flange. See Figures 9.2.1.2 through 9.2.1.5.
Check the slope of the bottom of the deck on overhangs. The edge of the
deck should be higher than the location next to the beam top flange.
DECEMBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
9-6
Detailing
The main transverse deck reinforcement shall consist of straight bars
located in both the top and the bottom reinforcing mats.
For the acute corners of highly skewed bridges, detail the deck
reinforcement as follows: In addition to the 2-#16 bars that run parallel
to the expansion joint at the end of the deck, place 2 top mat #16 bars
that are 10 feet long and run parallel to the joint with a spacing of 5
inches. Also, run a series of radial transverse bars that shorten as they
progress into the corner. Finally, place a bent bar in the corner that ties
to the outside deck longitudinal bar and the end bar running parallel to
the joint. See Figure 9.2.1.1.
Figure 9.2.1.1
Add a longitudinal tie at the end of the deck if the deck projects past the
end of the diaphragm more than 1 foot.
DECEMBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
9-7
Several detailing practices are to be used near piers:

Detail longitudinal steel (temperature and distribution) as
continuous over piers.
Provide additional longitudinal steel to minimize transverse deck
cracking. See Figures 9.2.1.6 and 9.2.1.7.
For decks supported on non-continuous prestressed beams, detail
a partial depth sawcut in the deck over the pier backfilled with a
sealant. See Figure 9.2.1.8.
Place polystyrene on the corners of prestressed concrete beams
bridges with skews greater than 20 to reduce wandering of the
transverse deck crack at the centerline of pier.
See
Figure 9.2.1.8.
For bridges with transverse deck reinforcement parallel to the skew,
dimension transverse bar spacing along edge of deck.
Deck Placement Sequence
For bridges with wide decks and continuous bridges with long spans, a
deck placement sequence detailing locations of transverse construction
joints shall be shown in the plans. A deck placement sequence must be
provided on the following bridges:
Bridges with decks wider than 90 feet.
Continuous bridges with spans exceeding 150 feet.
Bridges where the concrete placement rate is not high enough to
cast 60% of the span length per hour.
Generally, for steel girder superstructures locate the first transverse
construction joint at the 0.6 point of the first span. The following pour
shall commence at the 0.6 point of the adjacent span and shall terminate
at the end of the previous pour. Continue this pattern for all interior
spans. Start the last pour at the end of the bridge and extend to the end
of the previous pour. A minimum of 72 hours is required between pours
in adjacent spans.
For unusual span length configurations, discuss location of transverse
construction joints with the Bridge Design Engineer and Regional
Construction Engineer.
Provide information on the location and pattern for the deck placement
on the superstructure details of the bridge plan.
DECEMBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
9-8
REINFORCEMENT FOR DECK ON PRESTRESSED CONCRETE BEAMS

(Negative Moment @ 10 inches from CL Beam)
Transverse Reinforcement
Maximum
Bottom
Beam
Top
Deck
Longitudinal
Longitudinal
Thickness
Reinforcement
Reinforcement
with Wearing
w/o Wearing
Course
Course
4'-9"
13 @ 7"
13 @ 8"
13 @ 8"
13 @ 10"
13 @ 1'-6"
6'-0"
13 @ 6"
13 @ 7"
13 @ 8"
13 @ 9"
13 @ 1'-6"
6'-6"
13 @ 6"
13 @ 7"
13 @ 7"
13 @ 9"
13 @ 1'-6"
7'-0"
13 @ 5"
13 @ 7"
13 @ 7"
13 @ 8"
13 @ 1'-6"
7'-6"
13 @ 5"
13 @ 6"
13 @ 7"
13 @ 8"
13 @ 1'-6"
8'-0"
13 @ 5"
13 @ 6"
13 @ 7"
13 @ 7"
13 @ 1'-6"
8'-6"
13 @ 5"
13 @ 6"
13 @ 6"
13 @ 7"
13 @ 1'-6"
9'-0"
16 @ 7"
13 @ 5"
13 @ 6"
16 @ 10"
13 @ 1'-6"
9'-6"
16 @ 6"
13 @ 5"
13 @ 6"
16 @ 10"
13 @ 1'-6"
10'-0"
16 @ 6"
13 @ 5"
13 @ 5"
16 @ 9"
13 @ 1'-6"
10'-6"
16 @ 6"
16 @ 7"
13 @ 5"
16 @ 9"
13 @ 1'-6"
11'-0"
16 @ 5"
16 @ 7"
16 @ 6"
16 @ 8"
13 @ 1'-6"
11'-6"
16 @ 5"
16 @ 6"
16 @ 6"
16 @ 8"
13 @ 1'-6"
12'-0"
19 @ 7"
16 @ 6"
16 @ 5"
16 @ 8"
13 @ 1'-6"
12'-6"
19 @ 7"
16 @ 6"
16 @ 5"
16 @ 8"
13 @ 1'-6"
13'-0"
19 @ 7"
16 @ 6"
16 @ 5"
16 @ 8"
13 @ 1'-6"
13'-6"
19 @ 7"
16 @ 6"
16 @ 5"
16 @ 8"
13 @ 1'-6"
14'-0"
19 @ 7"
16 @ 6"
16 @ 5"
10
16 @ 8"
13 @ 1'-6"
14'-6"
19 @ 7"
16 @ 6"
16 @ 5"
10
16 @ 9"
13 @ 1'-6"
15'-0"
19 @ 7"
16 @ 6"
16 @ 5"
10
16 @ 9"
13 @ 1'-6"
Spacing
(in)
Bottom
Top
* Reinforcement shown is for bridges where beams are not continuous at piers and expansion joints exist at abutments.
Note that additional reinforcement may be required when integral abutments are used or beams are continuous at piers.
See Figure 9.2.1.6 for additional top reinforcement required at piers when only deck is continuous.
Design Assumptions:
1.
Live load moments are from LRFD Table A4.1-1.
2.
The 2" wearing course is sacrificial and is not used in determining a structural depth d for bottom steel.
3.
The control of cracking by distribution of flexural reinforcement requirements have been met using a clear cover of 1"
for bottom steel and 2" for top steel with a Z=130 kips/inch.
4.
The LRFD code (under empirical design) states the ratio of the effective beam spacing to slab thickness should be less
than 18 (Ontario uses 15); this slab thickness increase fits these requirements and is similar to what we have used
successfully in the past.
5.
A future wearing course of 20 psf with a load factor of 1.25 has been used.
6.
Concrete strength of 4 ksi; reinforcing steel strength of 60 ksi.
Table 9.2.1.1
DECEMBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
9-9
REINFORCEMENT FOR DECK ON STEEL BEAMS

(Negative Moment @ 3 inches from CL Beam)
Transverse Reinforcement
Maximum
Bottom
Beam
Top
Deck
Longitudinal
Longitudinal
Thickness
Reinforcement
Reinforcement
with Wearing
w/o Wearing
Course
Course
4'-9"
13 @ 7"
13 @ 7"
13 @ 6"
13 @ 6"
13 @ 1'-6"
5'-6"
13 @ 7"
13 @ 7"
13 @ 6"
13 @ 6"
13 @ 1'-6"
6'-0"
13 @ 7"
13 @ 7"
13 @ 6"
13 @ 6"
13 @ 1'-6"
6'-6"
13 @ 6"
13 @ 7"
13 @ 6"
13 @ 6"
13 @ 1'-6"
7'-0"
13 @ 5"
13 @ 7"
13 @ 6"
13 @ 6"
13 @ 1'-6"
7'-6"
13 @ 5"
13 @ 6"
13 @ 5"
13 @ 6"
13 @ 1'-6"
8'-0"
13 @ 5"
13 @ 6"
13 @ 5"
13 @ 6"
13 @ 1'-6"
8'-6"
13 @ 5"
13 @ 6"
13 @ 5"
13 @ 6"
13 @ 1'-6"
9'-0"
16 @ 7"
13 @ 5"
16 @ 6"
13 @ 6"
13 @ 1'-6"
9'-6"
16 @ 6"
13 @ 5"
16 @ 6"
13 @ 6"
13 @ 1'-6"
10'-0"
16 @ 6"
13 @ 5"
16 @ 6"
13 @ 6"
13 @ 1'-6"
10'-6"
16 @ 6"
16 @ 7"
16 @ 5"
13 @ 6"
13 @ 1'-6"
11'-0"
16 @ 6"
16 @ 7"
16 @ 5"
13 @ 6"
13 @ 1'-6"
11'-6"
16 @ 6"
16 @ 7"
16 @ 5"
13 @ 6"
13 @ 1'-6"
12'-0"
16 @ 6"
16 @ 7"
16 @ 5"
13 @ 6"
13 @ 1'-6"
12'-6"
16 @ 6"
16 @ 7"
16 @ 5"
10
13 @ 6"
13 @ 1'-6"
13'-0"
16 @ 6"
16 @ 7"
16 @ 5"
10
13 @ 6"
13 @ 1'-6"
13'-6"
16 @ 6"
16 @ 6"
19 @ 6"
10
13 @ 6"
13 @ 1'-6"
14'-0"
16 @ 5"
16 @ 6"
19 @ 6"
10
13 @ 6"
13 @ 1'-6"
14'-6"
16 @ 5"
16 @ 6"
19 @ 6"
11
13 @ 6"
13 @ 1'-6"
15'-0"
16 @ 5"
16 @ 6"
19 @ 6"
11
13 @ 6"
13 @ 1'-6"
Spacing
(in)
Bottom
Top
* Requirements for positive moment area shown; See Figure 9.2.1.7 for reinforcing requirements over the pier. Also note
that additional reinforcement may be needed in deck at abutments when integral abutments are used.
Design Assumptions:
1.
Live load moments are from LRFD Table A4.1-1.
2.
The 2" wearing course is sacrificial and is not used in determining a structural depth d for bottom steel.
3.
The control of cracking by distribution of flexural reinforcement requirements have been met using a clear cover of 1"
for bottom steel and 2" for top steel with a Z=130 kips/inch.
4.
The LRFD code (under empirical design) states the ratio of the effective beam spacing to slab thickness should be less
than 18 (Ontario uses 15); this slab thickness increase fits these requirements and is similar to what we have used
successfully in the past.
5.
A future wearing course of 20 psf with a load factor of 1.25 has been used.
6.
Concrete strength of 4 ksi; reinforcing steel strength of 60 ksi.
Table 9.2.1.2
DECEMBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 9.2.1.2
9-10
DECEMBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 9.2.1.3
9-11
DECEMBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 9.2.1.4
9-12
DECEMBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 9.2.1.5
9-13
DECEMBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 9.2.1.6
9-14
DECEMBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 9.2.1.7
9-15
DECEMBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 9.2.1.8
9-16
DECEMBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
9-17
9.3 Reinforced
Concrete Deck
Design Example
This example demonstrates the design of a typical reinforced concrete

deck. The dimensions used are consistent with those of the prestressed
beam design example in Section 5.7.2. The first part describes the
design of the interior region of a reinforced concrete deck supported on
beam or stringer elements. The second part provides design procedures
for the deck overhang region.
[4.6.2.2.4]
The deck is assumed to carry traffic loads to the supporting members

(beams or girders) via one-way slab or beam action. The supporting
members for the deck are parallel to the direction of traffic. The
substructures are not skewed, so the primary reinforcement for the deck
is placed perpendicular to the supporting members. Distribution steel is
placed parallel to the beams.
The reinforced concrete deck section with wearing course is illustrated in
Figure 9.3.1.
A. Material and
Design Parameters
[9.7.1.1]
[9.7.1.3]
[9.7.1.4]
B. Structural
Analysis of
Interior Region
[9.6.1]
Deck
Unit weight of deck and wearing course, deck = 0.150 kcf
Skew angle of bridge, = 0 degrees
Out-to-out bridge deck transverse width, bdeck = 51.33 ft = 616 in
Modular ratio, n = Es / Ecs = 29000 ksi / 3644 ksi 8
Railing/Barrier
A stiffening element is required at the edge of decks for load distribution.
This requirement is satisfied with the continuous F-rail typically used on
Mn/DOT bridges. Refer to the barrier design example in Section 13.3 for
more details.
The deck is modeled as a continuous beam on pinned supports provided
at the centerline of the supporting beams. The beams are assumed to be
rigid, not permitting vertical movement. Recognizing that beams have
top flanges that provide support for the deck over a finite dimension, the
specifications permit designing negative moment reinforcement for
locations that are offset from the centerline of the beam.
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
9-18
Figure 9.3.1
DECEMBER 2004
DECEMBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
9-19
[4.6.2.1.6]
For prestressed beams, negative moments should be checked at the

design section located 1/3 of the flange width away from the beam
centerline. The offset can be no more than 15 inches. For the top flange
width of 30 inches, check negative moments at a location 10 inches away
from beam centerline. The design uses a unit strip one foot wide.
C. Live Loads
[Appendix A4]
The AASHTO LRFD Specifications contain tables listing the design live
load moments (positive and negative) for decks supported on different
beam spacings. The tabularized moments are for a one foot wide strip.
The limitations for use of the tables include a check on the overhang
dimension. A minimum of 1.75 feet from the centerline of the fascia
beam is permitted. The maximum overhang permitted is the lesser of
[6.0 feet or (0.625 x beam spacing)].
0.625 9.0 ft = 5.63 ft 6.0 ft
For this example the overhang is:
1
(51.33 45.0) = 3.17 ft
2
The overhang
parameters.
dimension
OK
1.75 ft < 3.17 ft < 5.63 ft
checks
are
satisfied,
as
are
the
other
Interpolate Design Live Load Moments

LRFD Table A4.1-1 lists the following design live load moments for a
beam spacing of 9.0 ft:
Positive moment
= 6.29 kip-ft
Negative moment (9 in)
= 4.28 kip-ft
Negative moment (12 in)
= 3.71 kip-ft
Interpolate to obtain a value at the design section (10 inches away from
the center of the supporting beam):
4.28 3.71
4.28 1
= 4.09 kip - ft/ft
3
The values in LRFD Table A4.1-1 include the multiple presence and
dynamic load allowance factors.
D. Dead Loads
The dead load moments are based on the self-weight of the 7 inch deck,
a 2 inch wearing course, and a 0.020 ksf future wearing surface.
Depth of concrete deck, ddeck = 7 in + 2 in = 9 in
DECEMBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
9-20
Dead loads will be computed for a strip of deck 1 foot wide. Mn/DOT
practice is to simplify the dead load bending moment calculations, by
computing both the positive and negative dead load bending moments
using:
W L2
MDC = DC
10
Deck and Wearing Course Load:
Wdeck = deck ddeck = (0.150) (9)
1
= 0.11 klf
2
Future Wearing Surface Load:
WWS = 0.02 klf

Combined Dead Load:
WDC = Wdeck + WWS = 0.11 + 0.02 = 0.13 klf

Dead Load Bending Moment:
0.13 (9)2
MDC =
= 1.05 kip-ft
10
E. Flexural Design
Moments
[1.3.3 1.3.5]
The load modifiers for the deck design are:
D = 1.00
R = 1.00
I = 1.00
Then cum = D R I = 1.00
[Table 3.4.1-1]
Use the load factors provided in LRFD Article 3.4.1 to generate the
Strength I and Service I design moments.
Strength I Limit State Loads
U1 = 1.00 [1.25 (DC) + 1.75 (LL )]

Negative Design Moment:
Mu(neg) = 1.00 1.25 (MDC ) + 1.75 MLL(neg)
)]
= 1.00 [1.25 (1.05) + 1.75 (4.09)] = 8.47 kip-ft
DECEMBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
9-21
Positive Design Moment:
Mu(pos) = 1.00 1.25 (MDC ) + 1.75 MLL(pos)
)]
= 1.00 [1.25 (1.05) + 1.75 (6.29)] = 12.32 kip-ft
Service I Limit State Loads
S1 = 1.00 [1.0 (DC) + 1.0 (LL )]

Negative Design Moment:
MS(neg) = 1.00 1.0 (MDC ) + 1.0 MLL(neg)
)]
= 1.00 [1.0 (1.05) + 1.0 (4.09 )] = 5.14 kip-ft
Positive Design Moment:
MS(pos) = 1.00 1.0 (MDC ) + 1.0 MLL(pos)
)]
= 1.00 [1.0 (1.05) + 1.0 (6.29)] = 7.34 kip-ft
F. Top Steel
(Negative
Moment)
[5.7.3]
[5.5.4.2]
Flexure Strength Check

The top reinforcement has a clear cover of 3 inches (which includes the
2 inch wearing course). Design the negative moment reinforcement
assuming a singly reinforced cross section and that #13 bars are used
( db = 0.50 inches ).
Flexural and tension resistance factor, = 0.90
Determine distance
reinforcement.
ds = ddeck cover -
from
extreme
compression
1
1
db = 9 3 0.5 = 5.75 in
2
2
Try #13 bars with a 6.5 inch center-to-center spacing.

Width of compression face of member, b = 12 in
fiber
to
tension
DECEMBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
9-22
Area of top steel provided per foot,

12
12
= 0.20
A s(top) = A b
= 0.37 in2
spacing
6
.
5
a = c1 =
A s(top) fy
0.85 fc b
0.37 60
= 0.54 in
0.85 4 12
a
0.54 1
Mn = A s(top) fy ds = 0.37 60 5.75
2
2 12
= 10 .14 kip-ft
Mn = 0.9 10.14 = 9.13 kip-ft > 8.47 kip-ft

[5.7.3.4]
OK
Crack Control Check

The design value for the crack width parameter (Z) for severe exposure
is 130 kip/in .
The thickness of clear cover used to compute dc shall not be taken
greater than 2.0 inches.
Assuming #13 bars are used,
dc = 2.0 + 0.5 db = 2.25 in .
The area of concrete A top assumed to participate with the primary
tensile reinforcement for this check is:
2 dc b 2 2.25 12
=
A top =
= 29.25 in2
12
Nbars
6.5
[5.7.3.4-1]
The maximum tensile stress permitted in the top mat at the Service I
limit state is:
Z
130
fsa(top) =
=
= 32.2 ksi 0.6 fy = 36 ksi
3
3d A
2.25 29.25
c
top
Compute the stress in the reinforcement using a cracked section analysis.
Begin by locating the neutral axis.
DECEMBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
bx
9-23
x
= n A s (ds x )
2
12 x 2
= 8 0.37 (5.75 x )
2
1.46
x
= 5.26 in
j ds = ds = 5.75
3
3
The stress in the reinforcement when subjected to the Service I moment
is:
Ms(neg)
5.14 12
OK
fs =
=
= 31.7 ksi 32.2 ksi
A s j ds
0.37 5.26
[5.7.3.3.1]
Maximum Reinforcement
The LRFD maximum reinforcement check is a limit on the neutral axis to
steel depth ratio. The c/d ratio must be less than 0.42.
[5.7.2.2]
For 4 ksi concrete, the depth of the section in compression can be found
with the a dimension determined in the strength equations and 1 . For
4 ksi concrete, 1 = 0.85 .
c=
a
0.54
=
= 0.64 in
1
0.85
c
c
0.64
=
=
= 0.11 < 0.42
de
ds
5.75
OK
DECEMBER 2004
[5.7.3.3.2]
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
9-24
Minimum Reinforcement
Reinforcement should be provided to carry the smaller of 1.2 times the
cracking moment ( Mcr ) or 1.33 times the Strength I bending moment
( M u ).
Conservatively assume a full 9 inch deep section for the minimum

reinforcement check.
S deck =
[5.4.2.6]
b (ddeck )2 12 (9)2
=
= 162 in3
6
6
The rupture stress ( fr ) of concrete is assumed to be:
fr = 0.24 fc = 0.24 4 = 0.48 ksi

Set the cracking moment ( Mcr ) equal to fr S :
1
1.2 Mcr = 1.2 (fr S) = 1.2 (0.48 162 )
= 7.78 kip-ft
12
GOVERNS
1.33 M u(neg) = 1.33 8.47 = 11.27 kip-ft
Use the 1.2 Mcr value to check minimum reinforcement.
Mn = 9.13 kip-ft > 7.78 kip-ft

G. Bottom Steel
(Positive Moment)
[5.7.3]
OK
Flexure Strength Check

The bottom reinforcement has a clear cover of one inch. Because the
wearing course may be removed in future milling operations, do not
include it in structural capacity computations. Size the positive moment
reinforcement assuming a singly reinforced cross section. Assume that
#16 bars are used.
Determine distance
reinforcement.
from
extreme
ds = ddeck cover wear course
compression
fiber
to
tension
1
1
db = 9 1 2 0.63 = 5.69 in
2
2
Try #16 bars with a 7 inch center-to-center spacing.

Area of steel per foot = A s(bot)
12
12
= 0.31
A s(bot) = A b
= 0.53 in2
spacing
7
A s(bot) fy
0.53 60
= 0.78 in
a = c1 =
=
0.85 fc b 0.85 4 12
DECEMBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
9-25
a
0.78 1
Mn = A s(bot) fy ds = 0.53 60 5.69
2
2 12
= 14 .05 kip-ft
Mn = 0.9 14.05 = 12.65 kip-ft > 12 .32 kip-ft

[5.7.3.4]
OK
Crack Control Check

Crack width parameter for severe exposure Z = 130 kip/in
Depth of concrete measured from extreme tension fiber to center of bar

located closest is dc :
dc = cover +
db
0.63
= 1.0 +
= 1.31 in
2
2
Area of concrete A bot assumed to participate with the reinforcement for

this check is:
2 dc b 2 1.31 12
= 18.41 in2
=
A bot =
12
Nbars
[5.7.3.4-1]
The maximum tensile stress in mild steel reinforcement at the Service I

limit state is:
fsa(bot) =
Z
3d
A bot
130
3
1.31 18.41
= 45.0 ksi > 36 ksi , Use 36 ksi
Compute the stress in the reinforcement using a cracked section analysis.

Begin by locating the neutral axis.
b x2
= n A s (ds x )
2
12 x 2
= 8 0.53 (5.69 x )
2
1.68
x
= 5.13 in
j ds = ds = 5.69
3
3
The stress in the reinforcement when subjected to the Service I design
moment is:
fs =
Ms (pos)
A s j ds
7.34 12
= 32.4 ksi 36.0 ksi
0.53 5.13
OK
DECEMBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
9-26
[5.7.3.3.1]
Maximum Reinforcement Check

The LRFD maximum reinforcement check is a limit on the neutral axis to
steel depth ratio. This c/d ratio must be less than 0.42.
[5.7.2.2]
Similar to the negative moment region use 1 = 0.85 and the a

dimension from the strength computations.
c
d
e
[5.7.3.3.2]
a
0.78
=
d = 0.85 5.69 = 0.16 < 0.42
1
s
OK
Minimum Reinforcement Check

Reinforcement should be provided to carry the smaller of 1.2 times the
cracking moment ( Mcr ) or 1.33 times the Strength I bending moment
( M u ).
1
1.2 Mcr = 1.2 (fr S ) = 1.2 (0.48 162 )
= 7.78 kip-ft
12
GOVERNS
1.33 M u(pos) = 1.33 12.32 = 16.39 kip-ft
Use the 1.2 Mcr value to check minimum reinforcement.
Mn = 12.65 kip-ft > 7.78 kip-ft

H. Bottom
Longitudinal
Reinforcement
[9.7.3.2]
As part of the Traditional Design Method an equivalent width method

for reinforced bridge deck designs is utilized.
The constraints for
reinforced concrete decks, designed in accordance with traditional
methods, are given in LRFD 9.7.3. To ensure proper load distribution,
reinforcement placed perpendicular to the primary reinforcement must be
placed in the bottom mat. This reinforcement is a fraction of the primary
steel required for the bottom of the section (positive moment). For decks
where the primary reinforcement is placed perpendicular to traffic, the
longitudinal reinforcement requirement in the bottom mat is:
220
67%
S
e
[9.7.2.3]
OK
where S e = effective span length in feet
The effective span length is a function of the beam or stringer spacing

and the type of beam or stringer. For prestressed concrete I-beam
sections, the effective span length is the distance between flange tips
plus the distance the flange overhangs the web on one side.
S e = beam spacing top flange width + flange overhang

= 9.0 ft 2.5 ft + 1.0 ft = 7.5 ft
220
= 80.3% 67%
7.5
Use 67%
DECEMBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
9-27
Use 67% of the primary steel in the bottom mat. The required area of
steel is:
A s(req) = 0.67 A s(bot) = 0.67 0.53 = 0.36 in2 /ft
Try #16 bars on 10 inch centers. Area of steel provided equals:

12
12
= 0.31
A s(prov) = A b
= 0.37 in2 /ft
10
spacing
= 0.37 in2 /ft 0.36 in2 /ft
I. Top Longitudinal
Reinforcement
OK
The top longitudinal bars must meet the shrinkage and temperature
reinforcement requirements.
Ag
= 0.11 12 9 = 0.20 in2 /ft
Temperature A s 0.11
fy
60
(total in each direction, distributed to both faces)

For each face, Min. temp. A s =
1
(0.20) = 0.10 in2 /ft
2
Use #13 bars spaced at 18 inches ( A s = 0.13 in2 /ft ) for top
longitudinal reinforcement.
Mn/DOT uses additional reinforcement over the piers for continuous
decks over piers where the beams are not continuous. The additional
reinforcing consists of two #19 bars placed on 6 inch centers between the
top mat #13 bars. Refer to Figure 9.2.1.6 for typical reinforcement
detailing.
Figure 9.3.2 illustrates the final reinforcement layout for the interior
region of the deck.
DECEMBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
9-28
Figure 9.3.2
J. Structural
Analysis of
Overhang Region
[A13.2-1]
Figure 9.3.3 illustrates the overhang region.

Four cases must be
considered for the overhang design:
Case 1:
Extreme Event II evaluated at the gutter line for the dead
load plus horizontal collision force.
Case 2:
Extreme Event II evaluated at the edge of the beam flange
for the dead load plus horizontal collision force plus live
load.
Case 3:
Strength I evaluated at the edge of the beam flange for the
dead load plus live load.
Case 4:
Extreme Event II evaluated at the edge of the beam flange
for the dead load plus vertical collision force plus live load.
For this example, the distance from the edge of flange to the gutter line
is small, so by inspection Case 2 and Case 3 will not govern. Case 4 will
never govern when the Mn/DOT overhang limitations are followed and a
Test Level 4 F-rail is used. Therefore, only Case 1 calculations are
included in this example.
DECEMBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
9-29
Figure 9.3.3
1. Geometry and Loads

Overhang = 3.17 ft
(calculated earlier)
Edge of deck to negative moment section location = 20 in

Deck thickness at gutter line (ignoring wearing course):
20
8 + (9.5 8)
= 9.30 in
23
Average deck thickness:
8 + 9.30
= 8.65 in
2
Deck Bending Moment (at Gutter Line)

1.67
8.65
Mdeck
= 0.15 kip-ft
0.150 1.67
2
12
Barrier Bending Moment

Barrier weight is 0.477 kips per foot.
11.04 inches outside of the gutter line.
The centroid of the barrier is
DECEMBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
9-30
11.04
M barrier = w barrier x cb = 0.477
= 0.44 kip-ft
12
[A13.2]
Collision Force Tension and Bending Moment

The F-rail with wearing course has a maximum capacity R w = 121.5 kips
(see Section 13.3.1E). The factored design force Ft = 54 kips for a Test
Level 4 railing.
Mn/DOT requires the deck to carry the lesser of the rail capacity R w or
4
/3 x Ft :
Fcollision = R w = 121.5 kips

or
Fcollision =
4
4
Ft = (54) = 72 kips
3
3
GOVERNS
The collision force is applied at a height of 34 inches above the top of the
structural deck. It generates a tension force and a bending moment in
the overhang portion of the deck. The moment arm to the center of the
deck cross-section at the gutter line is:
9.30
= 38.65 in = 3.22 ft
Moment arm = 34 +
2
(wearing course is ignored)
The collision force is applied to a length of barrier 3.5 feet long.
Computations for the standard F-rail design example (Section 13.3.1E)
indicate that 10.2 feet of barrier length ( L c ) is engaged in resisting the
collision force in the interior regions. Assume that a deck width of
10.2 feet plus two barrier heights (using a 45 degree distribution) resists
the tension force and overturning moment.
Fc(linear) = Fcollision / effective deck width
=
Fcollision
72
=
= 4.54 kips/ft
L c + L 45deg 10.2 + 2.83 2
Mc = Fc(linear) (moment arm) = 4.54 3.22 = 14.62 kip-ft/ft
Extreme Event II Limit State Bending Moment

Dead Load Moment:
M = (Mdeck + Mbarrier ) = (0.15 + 0.44) = 0.59 kip-ft/ft

Total Factored Moment:
M u = 1.00 Mc + 1.25 MDL = 1.00 14.62 + 1.25 0.59 = 15.36 kip-ft/ft
DECEMBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
9-31
Total Factored Axial Force:

Pu = Fc(linear) = 4.54 kips/ft
The eccentricity of Pu is:
eu =
Mu 15.36
=
= 3.38 ft = 40.56 in
Pu
4.54
2. Overhang Resistance
The overhang must resist both axial tension and bending moment. The
capacity of the overhang will be determined by considering the tension
side of the structural interaction diagram for a one foot wide portion of
the overhang. See Figure 9.3.4.
Figure 9.3.4
Check if the reinforcement chosen for the interior region will be adequate
for the overhang region. The interior region reinforcement is:
Top reinforcement #13 bars @ 61/2" ( A s = 0.37 in2 /ft )
Bottom reinforcement #16 bars @ 7" ( A s = 0.53 in2 /ft )
DECEMBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
9-32
Referring to Figure 9.3.5, determine the capacity of the overhang section

for the eccentricity eu equal to 40.56 inches.
Start by assuming that for both the top and bottom reinforcement,
s > y .
Next, check development of the top and bottom bars from the edge of
deck. From Figure 5.2.2.2 of this manual:
For #13 bars, l d = 12 in
For #16 bars, l d = 15 in
For #13 top bars, available l davail(13) = 18 in
100% developed
For #16 bottom bars, available l davail(16) = 16 in
100% developed
Figure 9.3.5
DECEMBER 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
9-33
Then:
A stopeff = 0.37 in2 /ft
A sboteff = 0.53 in2 /ft

Tstop = A stopeff fy = 0.37 60 = 22.20 kips
Tsbot = A sboteff fy = 0.53 60 = 31.80 kips
Tstot = 22.20 + 31.80 = 54.0 kips

The total compression force C is:
C = 0.85 fc b a = 0.85 4.0 12.0 0.85 c = 34.68 c

Find the distance from the bottom of the section to the neutral axis by
taking moments about Pn :
22.20 (40.56 3.40) + 31.80 (40.56 + 1.04)
0.85 c
34.68 c 40.56 + 4.65

=0
2
2147.83 1567.88 c + 14.74 c2 = 0

c = 1.39 in
Check if original assumption was correct that s > y .

y =
fy
Es
60
= 0.00207
29,000
0.003
stop = (4.65 + 3.40 1.39 )
= 0.0144 > 0.00207
1.39
0.003
sbot = (4.65 1.04 1.39 )
= 0.0048 > 0.00207
1.39
Therefore the assumption was correct.

Then,
C = 34.68 c = 34.68 1.39 = 48.21 kips

And,
Pn = Tstop + Tsbot C
= 22.20 + 31.80 48.21 = 5.79 kips
DECEMBER 2004
[1.3.2.1]
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
9-34
The resistance factor for Extreme Event II limit state is 1.0. Therefore,
Pn = Pn = 5.79 kips > 4.54 kips

Mn = Pn eu = 5.79 40.56
OK
1
= 19.57 kip-ft
12
= 19 .57 kip-ft > 15 .36 kip-ft
OK
Therefore, the interior region reinforcement is adequate for the overhang

region. Note that if the reinforcement was found inadequate, the barrier
bar that extends into the deck could also have been included as tension
reinforcement.
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
10-1
10.
FOUNDATIONS
Different types of foundations are used throughout the state due to the
variety of soil and rock conditions present.
This section provides
guidance on the design and detailing practices for spread footings, driven
piles, and drilled shaft foundations.
10.1
Determination of
Foundation Type
and Capacity
During preliminary design a number of activities take place to determine

the types of foundations to be used and the permitted capacities for
foundation components.
Prior to beginning final design on trunk highway projects, designers
should review the Foundation Engineers Memo and the Bridge
Construction Units Recommendations.
For bridges on the local road system, the local agency or their consultant
will retain a private geotechnical engineering firm to prepare a foundation
recommendations report. The report will summarize the geotechnical
conditions, the proposed bridge structure, and recommend a foundation
type.
10.1.1 Foundation
Report
After conducting an exploration program, Mn/DOTs Foundation Engineer

summarizes the geotechnical conditions at the site in a memo. The
Regional Bridge Engineer reviews the Foundation Engineers Memo and
the preliminary plans for the project and prepares the final
recommendations concerning the foundations for the project. A sample
Bridge Construction Unit Foundation Recommendation is provided in
Appendix 10-A.
10.1.2 Foundation
Recommendations
Type and Size

Based on geotechnical information and the anticipated type of structure,
a foundation type will be recommended. In most cases pile supported
footings will be recommended. The piling may be timber, cast-in-place
concrete, H-pile, or pipe pile.
Where scour is not a concern and soil or
rock with adequate bearing capacity is found near the surface, spread
footings may be recommended. Occasionally, a footing supported on
drilled shafts will be recommended.
Load Capacity
The bearing resistance for the material below spread footings or the axial
load capacity for piles or shafts will be provided in the foundation
recommendations.
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
10-2
Settlement/Downdrag
Recommendations may specify that a waiting period be provided after
the placement of an embankment in order to allow settlement to occur
before starting construction of a substructure.
In some cases, a
surcharge embankment, to be removed after the waiting period, may
also be recommended as a means of accelerating the rate of
consolidation.
If long term settlement is expected, pile downdrag will be considered.
Unless piles are isolated from the settling material (with a bituminous
coating), settlement will introduce downdrag in the piling or shafts due to
side friction. The amount of downdrag to consider will be specified in the
Foundation Recommendations.
Method of Construction Control
To ensure that foundations will have the capacities anticipated during
design, testing or observations are made during construction. These
construction controls consist of compaction testing for spread footings,
Mn/DOT pile driving formula, Pile Driving Analyzer (PDA) testing, or
physical load tests for piling and Cross-hole Sonic Logging (CSL) for
drilled shafts.
The Foundation Recommendations will identify the
construction controls to be used for the project.
Estimated Pile Length
The soil exploration program will not completely describe the
geotechnical conditions at the site.
To account for this variability,
estimated pile lengths are used in computing bid quantities. Test pile
lengths 10 feet longer than anticipated pile lengths are specified in the
recommendations. If during construction, the test piles indicate that a
longer or shorter length is justified, the production piling quantities and
payments are adjusted accordingly.
Estimated Bottom of Footing Elevation
To minimize the potential for scour, settlement, or frost heave problems
a recommended bottom of footing elevation will be presented for each
substructure location.
Other General Information needed for Plan Preparation
Check pile layouts for interference with in-place utilities (including
overhead power lines), drains and existing piles/foundations.
Unique projects may have limits placed on the amount of noise and
vibration that can be generated during construction.
JANUARY 2004
10.2 Piles
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
10-3
Several types of piling are available (treated or untreated timber, steel H

and pipe piles, and cast-in-place concrete piles). The Regional Bridge
Engineer may recommend that more than one type or size be used for a
project.
Steel H-piles are steel H-shaped sections that are usually fitted with
manufactured points and driven to a minimum bearing capacity. In some
cases, high strength, small diameter, thick-walled pipe are permitted as a
substitute for H-piles.
If permitted, this will be indicated in the
Foundation Recommendations.
Cast-in-place (CIP) piles are steel pipe shells with a plate welded to the
bottom that are driven to a minimum bearing capacity or to an estimated
tip elevation. After driving, the inside of the shell is filled with concrete.
Reinforcement may be needed if the pile is subjected to tension or
flexure.
The pay item Pile Tip Protection refers to manufactured points for Hpiling. The pay item Pile Points refers to manufactured points that are
used to protect the shells of cast-in-place piles during driving operations.
The Regional Bridge Engineers recommendations will identify whether or
not tips or points should be used.
Quantities to be included in a final plan set for structures supported on
piling are: 1) length of piling delivered, 2) length of piling driven, 3)
number and length of test piles, and 4) pile tip protection or pile points.
Standard Details B201 and B202 contain the standard splices for cast-inplace pile shells and H-piling.
Designers can typically assume that steel H and CIP piles can resist a
factored horizontal load of 18 kips per pile (without consideration of the
batter). Larger horizontal capacities need to be calculated (based on the
geotechnical properties of the material at the site.)
When horizontal forces control the design, a more in-depth consideration
of horizontal loads and resistances should be made before adding
additional piles.
Pile and drilled shaft foundation plans should be dimensioned from
working points.
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
10-4
Pile Load Table For Plan

Current practice for construction of pile foundations is to drive piling to
refusal or to drive piling to the required design service load indicated in
the plan. The service load resistance is monitored in the field using the
Mn/DOT pile driving formula or by using Pile Driving Analyzer (PDA)
testing. The resistance factors found in the LRFD Specifications for pile
foundations have been found to be inadequate for use in design. Until
appropriate resistance factors are determined, continue to report
maximum service pile loads in the plans using one of the Standard Plan
Note tables shown in Appendix 2-H, Section F. To fill out the table, first
determine the maximum factored pile load from the critical load
combination. Report this value in the Factored Total Load block of the
table. Also, split up the load as required and fill in the other factored
load blocks in the table. Next, determine the corresponding service pile
load, which will be placed in the Design Load block of the table. Finally,
compute the average load factor, which is:
Average Load Factor = (Factored Total Load) / (Design Load)
See Section 11.4.1G and 11.4.3F for example calculations.
Test Piles
Each bridge substructure utilizing a pile-type foundation will typically
require one or two test piles. Separate the test piles (use a maximum
spacing of about 40 feet) within a foundation unit to facilitate a more
accurate assessment by the Field Engineer of the in-situ soil
characteristics. The Foundation Recommendation prepared by the Bridge
Construction Unit will specify the number of test piles for each
substructure unit. For abutments with all battered piles, place a test pile
in the front and in the back row. For pier footings, place test piles near
the center of the pile group. If possible, use vertical test piles. Number
and locate test piles on the Bridge Survey Plan and Profile sheets.
Test piles are used to establish the length for the pier and abutment
foundation piles. Based on the number of blows per foot at the end of
driving, the size of the pile driving equipment, and the length of the pile
being driven, estimated bearing capacity can be arrived at with different
formulas. The procedure used to determine pile bearing capacity is
described in Mn/DOT Spec. 2452.3, Section E2.
On large projects when specified, foundation test piles are evaluated with
electronic equipment attached to the pile during the driving process. This
equipment, called a Pile Driving Analyzer or PDA, provides more specific
information concerning the capacity of the pile. A pay item for pile
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
10-5
analysis must be included in the plan when the PDA is performed by the
contractor.
Pile redriving is specified in the Foundation Recommendation when the
soils are of a type that additional bearing capacity can be gained after the
pile has set for 24 hours or more. For this situation, include an item for
pile redriving to compensate the contractor for redriving the pile(s) after
the required setup time.
[10.7.1.5]
Clear Spacing and Minimum Concrete Cover

The minimum concrete cover for piles is 9 inches. To facilitate piledriving operations the minimum pile spacing is 2-6 with 3-0 minimum
preferred.
It may be necessary to increase the plan dimensions of a footing or pile
cap when using battered piles to provide the minimum concrete cover of
9 inches.
The standard embedment into a pier or high abutment footing for a
driven pile is one foot and should be dimensioned in the plans. Assume
the piles are pinned supports.
Battered Piles
The standard pile batter for pier footings is 6 vertical on 1 horizontal. For
abutments, the standard batter is 4 vertical on 1 horizontal.
Pile layouts for foundations that include battered piles should be
dimensioned at the bottom of the footing.
10.3 Drilled Shafts
Drilled shafts are large-diameter reinforced concrete piles constructed by

boring a hole into earth and/or rock, inserting a reinforcing cage and
filling the cavity with concrete. Drilled shafts may also be called caissons
or drilled piers. Because of the high cost of construction, drilled shafts
are normally used only when the foundation characteristics of the site,
such as bedrock, may cause driven piling to attain bearing capacity at ten
feet or less below the footing, when piling cannot be embedded below the
computed scour elevation of a streambed, and for other reasons
applicable to a particular project. Drilled shafts may also be used to
enhance the stability of piers adjacent to a navigation channel.
Information used for the design of drilled shafts is determined by the
Mn/DOT Foundations Unit. This information includes depth (length) of
the earth and rock portions of the shaft, and maximum load capacity for
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
10-6
a given diameter. Load capacity of drilled shafts is provided by end

bearing on rock (minimum embedment five feet), or by sidewall friction
in soil or rock.
Drilled shafts are designed as columns subjected to axial and lateral
loads. Lateral loads may or may not be resisted by passive soil pressure,
i.e., scour depth below the streambed (flowline) should not be considered
as providing lateral support.
If shafts are placed in a group, the
minimum center-to-center spacing is three times the diameter (D) of the
shaft and appropriate group reduction factors must be applied. When the
spacing is greater than 8D the shafts can be designed as individual units.
Shaft diameter is determined by the required loading, standard industry
drilling equipment, casing size, and other factors unique to the project.
Normally, shaft diameters are in the range of 3 to 5 feet. Smaller shafts
may be used to replace driven piles in a group, such as, that of a pier
footing. Larger shafts may be appropriate when a single shaft is used to
support a single pier column, or to minimize the number of shafts in a
group when deep shafts are required. For a combined earth and rock
shaft, the earth portion should be of a diameter that is 6 inches larger
than the rock shaft in order to allow passage of special rock drilling tools.
If a shaft terminates in rock, the design diameter for the full depth of the
shaft should be the same diameter as that of the rock portion.
Detailing of drilled shafts in the plans should consider location,
construction methods, foundation conditions, contract administration by
district construction personnel, structural integrity of finished shafts, etc.
Many details are job specific; therefore, much of this information should
be compiled before detailing is started.
Because most of the depth of a shaft is formed by the excavated
borehole, it will be necessary to determine if casings, either permanent
or temporary, will be used.
Permanent casings must be specified
whenever shafts are constructed in water, even if the work is contained
within a cofferdam and the final cut-off elevation is below the streambed
because dewatering cannot take place before the shafts are constructed.
Some contractors prefer that permanent casings be used through all soil
to the top of bedrock in case any of the soil is capable of caving.
Permanent casings should not be used in the sidewall friction area of soil
or rock. Temporary casings are provided by the contractor for the
convenience of construction operations and are removed at the
completion of the work. Most casings are provided in diameters of 6-inch
increments and should be specified as such. For metric plans, the
diameter must be soft-converted to metric units and not rounded off.
Otherwise, the contractor may provide custom-made casings at a higher
price.
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
10-7
Drilled shafts are reinforced in the same manner as round columns.

Cover on the bars should be three inches on the sides and six inches
from the bottom of the shaft. If the shaft design requires a reinforced
connection between the top of the shaft and the structure above and
hooked bars are intended, the hooks projecting beyond the side of the
shaft may prevent subsequent removal of temporary casings. Hooks
may be turned inward to avoid this interference, however, possible
interference with placement of footing reinforcement should then be
checked.
Uncoated reinforcement bars should be used unless the top portion of a
shaft will be permanently exposed, or if the bars will be extended into an
exposed portion of the structure. In this case, use coated bars only at
the top of the shaft unless it is more practical to use coated bars
throughout.
When specifying concrete for the shafts, the mix normally used is No.
'
1X46 ( fc = 5.0 ksi ) if the concrete will be placed in a wet (water-filled)
'
hole, and No. 1Y46 ( fc = 4.0 ksi ) if the concrete will be placed in a dry
hole. The first digit should be 3 for air-entrained concrete if the top
portion of the shaft will be exposed in the final construction. Aggregate
should be no larger than to provide for a positive flow around the
reinforcement since vibration of the concrete in the greater part of the
shaft is not practical.
Payment for the drilled shafts should always include separate items for
earth and rock shafts due to the large disparity in the cost of drilling. If
it appears to be unlikely that the shaft depth will change during
construction, payment for concrete, reinforcement, and permanent
casings (if used) can be included in the pay item for the shafts.
However, foundation conditions are rarely known with a high degree of
accuracy and changes in the shaft quantities may occur. For such
situations, separate items for the materials are recommended. In either
case, the plans and special provisions must clearly state how payment
will be made.
When boulders can be anticipated during drilling, include a pay item for
obstruction removal.
Because it is not possible to visually inspect the unexposed portion of a
finished shaft, other means of inspection and structural integrity testing
have been devised. One such test is Cross-hole Sonic Logging (CSL).
This test and other tests should be used only if recommended by the
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
10-8
Regional Bridge Engineer since these tests and the preparation of the
shafts for the tests can be very costly.
The resistance factors found in the LRFD Specifications for bearing
capacity for drilled shaft foundations have been found to be inadequate
for use in design. Until appropriate resistance factors are determined,
continue to report maximum service pressures in the plans using one of
the Standard Plan Note tables shown in Appendix 2-H, Section F. To fill
out the table, first determine the maximum factored bearing pressure
from the critical load combination. Report this value in the Factored
Total Load block of the table. Also, split up the load as required and fill
in the other factored load blocks in the table. Next, determine the
corresponding service pressure, which will be placed in the Design Load
block of the table. Finally, compute the average load factor, which is
equal to:
10.4 Footings
10.4.1 General
Any footings or foundations with a thickness of five feet or greater should

be treated as mass concrete. This may require the contractor to modify
the concrete mix and/or to instrument the concrete member and take
action to ensure that the temperature differential between the inside and
outside of the member is small enough to minimize the potential for
cracking.
Minimum Soil Cover
The minimum cover (soil, earth, or slope paving) on top of a footing is 12
inches. For a pier footing which extends under a roadway, the minimum
cover is 2 feet.
Bottom of Footing
To minimize the potential for frost movements impacting the structure,
the bottom of footings should be placed at least 4-6 below grade. When
feasible, the bottom of footings (or seals if they are used) should be
placed below the estimated scour elevation. In many cases this is not
economically practical and the bottom of footing elevation should be
evaluated using Section 10.6 as a minimum criteria.
Scour
Scour depth is based on the 500-year flood event.
For bridges over a river or stream, spread footings are not allowed due to
the potential for scour.
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
10-9
When designing footings in areas of potential scour assume no beneficial

ground support for the piling or drilled shafts from the flowline to the
predicted total scour elevation during the extreme event load case.
Footing Plan Dimensions/Formwork
Footing plan dimensions should be laid out in a manner that will allow
support of the formwork used to construct the substructure elements
above it. This is accomplished by extending the footing at least six
inches beyond the vertical face of the wall or stem.
Footing Thickness/Shear
The footing thickness should be sized such that shear reinforcement is
not required.
Footing Flexure Steel and d dimensions
For footings with a pile embedment of one foot or less, place flexural
reinforcement on top of the cut off piles. For pile footings with an
embedment greater than one foot, place reinforcement between the
piles.
Dowel Detailing
Dowels connecting the footing to the substructure unit shall be detailed
and dimensioned from working points. This reduces the chance of
construction tolerances for pile driving and concrete placement impacting
the final location of substructure components.
10.4.2 Footing
Supported on
Piling or Drilled
Shafts
Dimension length of pile embedment into the footing in the plans.

Identify battered piles with a symbol that differs from vertically driven
piles.
Seal Design
A seal is a mat of unreinforced concrete poured under water inside the
sheet piling of a cofferdam. It is designed to withstand the hydrostatic
pressure on its bottom when the water above is removed. Dewatering
the cofferdam allows cutting of piles, placement of reinforcing steel, and
pouring of the footing in a dry environment.
The hydrostatic pressure under the seal is resisted by the weight of the
seal, the friction between the seal perimeter and walls of the cofferdam,
and friction between the seal and foundation. The friction values used for
seal design are working stresses.
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
10-10
Bond on piles = 0.010 ksi

Bond on sheet piling = 0.002 ksi on seal depth less 2 feet
Lateral forces from stream flow pressure are resisted by penetration of
the sheet piling below the streambed elevation and by the bracing inside
the cofferdam.
The cofferdam design is the responsibility of the
contractor.
Design the seal to resist a depth of water H, defined as the distance from
the bottom of the seal to the elevation indicated in the Foundation
Recommendations.
A rule of thumb for the seal thickness to begin with during design is
0.25 H for pile footings. Use a minimum seal thickness equal to 3 feet.
In plan, the minimum seal size is 1-6 larger than the footing size on all
sides, but it must be large enough to avoid interference between sheeting
and battered piles.
10.4.3 Spread
Footings
Abutment spread footings supported on rock shall be keyed into rock a

minimum of six inches. Shear keys should be added to spread footings
when needed. Typical shear keys are 12x12 or 18x18.
To ensure proper bearing capacity below spread footings, a layer of
aggregate with 100% compaction may be specified under spread
footings. Refer to the Foundation Recommendations.
The resistance factors found in the LRFD Specifications for bearing
capacity for spread footing foundations have been found to be inadequate
for use in design. Until appropriate resistance factors are determined,
continue to report maximum service pressures in the plans using one of
the Standard Plan Note tables shown in Appendix 2-H, Section F. To fill
out the table, first determine the maximum factored bearing pressure
from the critical load combination. Report this value in the Factored
Total Load block of the table. Also, split up the load as required and fill
in the other factored load blocks in the table. Next, determine the
corresponding service pressure, which will be placed in the Design Load
block of the table. Finally, compute the average load factor, which is
equal to:
JANUARY 2004
10.5 Pile Bent
Piers and
Abutments
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
10-11
For pile bent piers, the pile tips should be driven a minimum of 10 feet
below the scour elevation. The capacity of piling needs to be checked for
the condition where the predicted scour event has occurred. When debris
loading can be excessive, encasing the piles with a concrete wall will be
specified.
For integral abutments, orient H-piles for weak axis bending in the
direction of movement and inform the Road Design group of the
appropriate approach panel detail to include in the roadway plans.
For pile bent piers, provide 2-0 of embedment into the cap. A larger
pile embedment equal to 2-6 is used for integral abutments. Use an
embedment of 2-4 for low parapet abutments.
10.6 Evaluation of
Existing Pile
Foundations when
Exposed by Scour
The following guidelines may be used with discretion by registered

engineers for determination of the stability of existing bridge
substructure units supported by pile foundations (see Figure 10.6.1) if
estimated scour depths are sufficient to expose piling. Estimated scour
depths to be used are those furnished by the Hydraulics Engineer for the
lesser of overtopping or a 500 year flood event.
(1)
(2)
For pile bent piers or abutments and for piers or abutments on

footings supported by friction piling, the substructure unit is
classified as stable with respect to scour if scour depth will not
expose more than 50% of the embedded piling, and the
unsupported pile length is not more than 24 times the
diameter of cast-in-place pile, 24 times the nominal section
depth of an H-pile, or 16 times the average diameter of a
timber pile.
For pile bent piers or abutments or for piers or abutments on
footings supported by end bearing piling, the substructure unit
is classified as stable with respect to scour if at least 5 feet of
the pile will remain embedded in dense material and the
unsupported pile length meets the criteria in (1) above.
The substructure unit shall be considered stable if the foundation satisfies

one of the above criteria. These guidelines are based on the concept that
countermeasures will be taken where inspection reveals scour holes in
the vicinity of pile bents or below the bottom of concrete footings. Pile
exposures without lateral support will therefore be of relatively short
duration.
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
10-12
Figure 10.6.1
JANUARY 2004
JANUARY 2004
10.7 Structure
Excavation and
Backfill
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
10-13
For state aid projects, bridge designers need to coordinate their

excavation and fill quantities with roadway designers. This is particularly
true for projects where grading is let as part of a separate contract.
Designers should note the limits of excavation and fill noted in the
standard bridge approach treatments (MN/DOT Standard Plans 5297.233 and 5-297.234).
The cost associated with excavating material, in and around foundations,
depends on several items. These items include: access to the site, the
amount of material that needs to be removed, the type of material to be
removed (sand, silt, clay, rock, etc.), and the location of the water table.
Mn/DOTs Spec. 2451 identifies and describes the standard classes (U, E,
R, WE, WR) of excavation by the cubic yard.
Where no rock is present, use a lump sum pay item for structure
excavation. The special provisions detail the percentage of excavation
paid for at each substructure unit.
Where rock is likely to be
encountered, pay for the rock excavation as Class R (or WR for rock
below water) by the cubic yard. Excavation above the rock is to be paid
for as a lump sum. Refer to the Foundation Recommendations.
When aggregate backfill is used under spread footings, the additional
excavation below the bottom of footing elevation is considered incidental
to placing the backfill material.
Class R excavation may be used by itself, in which case it would cover all
conditions of rock removal. When used in conjunction with WR, the lower
limits of the Class R should be noted in the Plans as being the same as
the upper limits of the WR (the lower water elevation shown in the
Plans).
Because rock excavation is expensive, adequate boring or
sounding information is essential to determine the elevation of the rock
surface. If the information furnished is insufficient to determine the
elevation of rock, additional data shall be requested from the District.
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
10-14
[Appendix 10-A: Sample Bridge Construction Unit Recommendations]

(FUTURE CONTENT)
JANUARY 2004
11. ABUTMENTS,
PIERS, AND
WALLS
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-1
This section contains guidance for the design and detailing of abutments,
piers, retaining walls, and sheet pile walls. Abutments and piers are used
to support bridge superstructures, whereas walls primarily function as
earth retaining structures. In most cases, abutments, piers, and walls
are reinforced concrete elements.
The preferred details for connecting the superstructure to the
substructure are dependent on the geometry and type of bridge. For
example, flexible substructure units supported by a single line of piles
may be constructed integral with the superstructure. Conversely, short
stiff substructure units are detailed with expansion bearings between the
superstructure and substructure to reduce the design loads in the
substructure units.
11.1 Abutments
General
Abutments function as both earth retaining structures and as vertical load
carrying components. Parapet abutments are detailed to accommodate
thermal movements with strip seal expansion devices between the
concrete deck and the abutment end block. Integral abutments are
designed to accommodate movements at the roadway end of the
approach panel. Based on the following parameters, select the type of
abutment for a project:
Integral abutments should be used on bridges less than 300 feet long
with skews less than or equal to 20. See Section 11.1.1 for more
details. Parapet abutments should be used in all other cases.
Extend architectural rustications 2 feet below the top of finished ground.
Railroad underpass abutments shall be designed according to AREMA
Specifications for the live load specified by the railroad. The Duluth
Mesabe & Iron Range Railway requires a special live load. Construction
will be in accordance with Mn/DOT Construction Specifications. The live
load surcharge is found by taking the axle load and distributing it over an
area equal to axle spacing multiplied by the track spacing, generally 70
square feet. Do not reduce the surcharge loading for skew.
Detailing/Reinforcement
Bridges with mask walls can develop a horizontal crack at the top of the
bridge seat that extends horizontally into the wingwall. To prevent such
cracks from occurring, detail the abutment/wingwall construction joint
through the thickness of the abutment in a plane coincident with the back
face of the wingwall.
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-2
For bridges without mask walls, place a 1-6 corner fillet at the back face
wingwall/abutment connection.
Detail a construction joint for the
wingwall/abutment connection at the end of the corner fillet and running
vertically through the wingwall thickness. Show 3-ply joint waterproofing
along the inside face of the joint.
Detail sidewalk paving brackets with the same width and elevation as the
roadway paving bracket. Sidewalks are to be supported on abutment
backwalls and detailed to float along adjacent wingwalls.
Avoid projections on the back of abutments that are less than 4-6 below
grade. If shallower projections are necessary, slope the bottom to
minimize frost upheaval effects.
Tie abutment and wingwall dimensions to the working points.
The gutter line, the edge of deck and the centerline of the fascia beam
should be illustrated and labeled in the corner details.
Provide the dimensions from working points to the intersection point of
the centerline of bearing and the inside face of wingwall.
To facilitate plan reading, label the ends of the abutments in the details
(South end, North end, etc.).
Label all construction joints and identify the nominal size of keyways.
Where conduit extends through an abutment, provide horizontal
dimensions from a working point to the location where the conduit
penetrates the front face of the abutment or the outside face of the
wingwall. The elevation at mid-height of the conduit should also be
provided.
For presentation clarity, detail abutments with complicated layouts on
separate sheets.
Identical abutments (except for minor elevation
differences) should be detailed on common sheets.
On footing details, specify the lap splice length for bent dowels and the
dowel projection for straight dowels.
If the railing contains a separate end post (supported on the abutment),
show the end post anchorage reinforcement in the abutment details.
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-3
Joint waterproofing (per Spec. 2481) shall be provided for construction

joints, doweled cork joints, Detail B801 joints, and on wall joints below
ground. Waterproofing is not required at the top of parapet expansion
block joint.
All reinforcement, except those completely in the footing, shall be epoxy
coated. The minimum size of longitudinal reinforcement in abutment and
wingwall footings is No. 19 bars.
Provide shrinkage and temperature reinforcement per Section 5.2.6. For
sections over 48 inches thick provide a minimum of No. 19 bars at 1-0.
Temporary construction loads may require additional reinforcement.
For bearing pedestals over 2 inches tall provide No. 13 or No.16
reinforcing tie bars at 6 inch to 8 inch centers in both directions under the
bearings. For pedestals with a height of 2 inches, only the transverse
reinforcement is required. Horizontal steel in pedestals should have 2
inches of clear cover to bridge seat. Provide a minimum of 2 inches of
clear distance between anchor rods and reinforcing tie bars.
Voided or hollow type abutments shall have access doors.
B942.
11.1.1 Integral
or Contraction
Abutments
See Detail
Integral abutments are the preferred type of abutment when length and
skew limitations are met as described in Section 11.1.
An integral abutment consists of an abutment wall or pile cap supported
by a single line of piles. The superstructure beams or slab bear on the
pile cap. An end diaphragm is cast which encases the beams and is
attached to the pier cap, making the superstructure integral with the
abutment. See Figure 11.1.1.1 for a typical integral abutment detail.
Verify that the roadway designer has included approach panel details for
a jointless abutment in the grading plan when an integral abutment is
used.
Geometry
Use a thickness of 3 feet for the abutment wall. Set the minimum
abutment depth below grade at 3 feet and use a minimum freeboard of 2
feet.
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 11.1.1.1
11-4
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-5
Cast-in-place piling is limited to bridges 150 feet or less in length. Orient

H-piling such that weak axis bending occurs under longitudinal bridge
movements. Minimum pile penetration into abutment wall is 2-6. The
preferred wingwall configuration is parallel to the centerline of the bridge.
If required, flare wingwalls to minimize length. Limit the length of the
wingwall cantilever to 12 feet.
For detailing purposes provide a
horizontal construction joint at the elevation of the concrete pile cap.
The upper portion of the wingwall is cast with the diaphragm and deck.
Tie the approach to the bridge with dowel bars that extend at a 45
degree angle out of the end diaphragm through the paving bracket seat
and bend horizontally 4 inches below the top of the approach panel.
Design/Analysis
Design piling for axial loads only. Assume that one half of the approach
panel load is carried by the abutment. Distribute live load over the entire
length of abutment. Apply the number of lanes that will fit on the
superstructure adjusted by the multiple presence factor.
Research indicates that the longitudinal moment at the abutment/slab
connection is approximately 1/3 the computed fixed-end moment. Design
the longitudinal deck reinforcement at the abutment for of the fixed
end moment due to live load only.
Design the abutment back face vertical bars for the following load cases:
Case 1 Design vertical bars for the maximum factored shear. Apply
the simple span girder reaction to the abutment wall. Consider the
wall to act as a continuous beam between pile supports.
Case 2 - Design vertical bars for of the fixed end moment due to
live load only.
Case 3 - Design vertical bars for the passive soil pressure which
results when the bridge expands. Assume the abutment wall acts as
a cantilever fixed at the bottom of the superstructure and free at the
bottom of the wall. Referring to Figure 11.1.1.2, determine the
passive pressure pp at the elevation of the bottom of superstructure
and apply as a uniform pressure on the cantilever:
p p = k p soil hsoil
2
k p = tan
45 +
2
= angle of internal friction of the backfill material (use 30 degrees)
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-6
Then design for a moment Mup equal to:

Mup
pp h2abut
= EH
A load factor for passive earth pressure is not specified in the LRFD
specifications. Use the maximum load factor for active earth pressure,
EH = 1.50.
Figure 11.1.1.2
Design front and back face horizontal bars for the passive soil pressure,
which results when the bridge expands. Consider the wall to be a
continuous beam with piles as supports and design for a moment of:
up
w L2
p
=
EH
10
wp = passive pressure calculated at the elevation of the bottom of

superstructure and applied as a uniform pressure on the wall
= pp habut
L = pile spacing
11.1.2 Parapet
Abutments
Design abutment wall top and bottom horizontal bars for vertical loads.
Consider the wall to be a continuous beam with piles as supports.
Parapet abutments have backwall or parapet elements that are separate
from the end diaphragms in the superstructure. Low parapet abutments
have total heights (including footing) of less than 15 feet. High parapet
abutments have total heights greater than 15 feet. If the total height of
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-7
the abutment is more than 40 feet, counterforts should be considered.

Figure 11.1.2.1 illustrates minimum cover and clearance dimensions for
parapet abutments. Typical rip rap details are presented in Figure
11.1.2.2.
Geometry
For parapet abutments, include pedestals under bearings and slope the
bridge seat between pedestals to provide drainage away from the
parapet wall and bearings. A standard seat slope provides one inch of
fall from the back of the seat to the front of the seat. In no case should
the slope be less than 2 percent.
Limit the maximum pedestal height to about 9 inches. The minimum
pedestal height is 2 inches (at the front of the pedestal). Set back
1
pedestals a minimum of 1 /2 inches from the front face of the abutment.
Design/Analysis
For design of piling or footing bearing pressures, as a minimum consider
the following load cases:
Construction Case 1 Strength I (0.90DC+1.00EV+1.5EH+1.75LS)
Abutment has been constructed and backfilled, but the superstructure
and approach panel are not in place. Use minimum load factors for
vertical loads and maximum load factors for horizontal loads. Assume
live load surcharge is acting.
Construction Case 2 Strength I (1.25DC)
Abutment has been constructed, but not backfilled. The superstructure
has been erected, but approach panel is not in place. Use maximum load
factor for dead load.
Final Case 1 Strength I (1.25DC+1.35EV+0.90EH+1.75LL)
Bridge is complete and approach panel is in place. Use maximum load
factors for vertical loads and minimum load factor applied to the
horizontal earth pressure (EH).
Final Case 2 Strength I (1.25DC+1.35EV+1.50EH+1.75LL)
Bridge is complete and approach panel is in place. Use maximum load
factor all loads.
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 11.1.2.1
Figure 11.1.2.2
11-8
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-9
Design abutments for active pressure using an equivalent fluid weight of

0.033 kcf. A higher pressure may be required based on soil conditions.
Neglect passive earth pressure in front of abutments.
Use LRFD Table 3.11.6.4-1 for determination of live load surcharge
equivalent soil heights. Apply live load surcharge only when there is no
approach panel.
Assume that one half of the approach panel load is carried by the
abutment.
Distribute superstructure loads (dead load and live load) over the entire
length of abutment. For live load, apply the number of lanes that will fit
on the superstructure adjusted by the multiple presence factor.
For resistance to lateral loads, assume piles can resist 18 kips per pile
(factored horizontal load) in addition to load taken by battering, unless
shown otherwise by analysis.
Design footing thickness such that no shear reinforcement is required.
Performance of the Service I crack control check per LRFD 5.7.3.4 is not
required for abutment footings.
Design abutment stem and backwall for horizontal earth pressure and live
load surcharge loads. For stem and backwall crack control check, use z =
170 kips/in.
11.1.2.1 Low
Abutments
Low abutments shall have vertical contraction joints at about a 32 foot

spacing. (See Detail B801.) A drainage system behind the stem need
not be provided for low abutments. Figure 11.1.2.1.1 contains typical
dimensions and reinforcing for low parapet abutments.
11.1.2.2 High
Abutments
High abutments shall have vertical construction joints (with keyways) at

about a 32 foot spacing.
Detail high abutments with granular backfill and drainage systems (Detail
B910). Outlet the 4 inch drains through wingwalls and backslopes.
Granular backfills at railroad bridge abutments typically includes
perforated pipe drains.
Figure 11.1.2.2.1 illustrates typical high
abutment dimensions and reinforcing.
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 11.1.2.1.1
11-10
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 11.1.2.2.1
11-11
JANUARY 2004
11.1.3 Wingwalls
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-12
The intended layout for the wingwalls will be provided in the preliminary
plans.
Where wingwalls are oriented parallel to the centerline of the roadway,
sidewalk and curb transitions should generally not be located adjacent to
wingwalls.
The maximum cantilever beyond the edge of footing for wingwalls is 12
feet. For cantilevers up to 8 feet, no design is required if the following
guidelines are used:
wingwall thickness = 1-6

maximum rustication depth = 2
horizontal bars are located inside or outside of the vertical bars
maximum height of cantilever = 13-6
horizontal back face reinforcement consists of #16 bars at 12
inches maximum spacing
For cantilevers greater than 8 feet in length, a design must be completed.

Avoid steep vertical offsets between wingwall footings by separating
footings with a 1:1 soil slope or by using a single footing to support the
entire wingwall.
With wingwalls over 20 feet long, separate footings with different
elevations may be required. Assume soil pressures between abutment
and wingwall footing are equally distributed to both footings. With
spread footings, limit the bottom of footing elevation difference to 5 feet.
With pile foundations, the distance between footing segments should be
greater than 1.5 times the elevation difference between footings. Limit
the cantilever (beyond the end of the footing) of wingwalls to 6 feet with
separate wingwall footings.
Vertical construction joints shall be provided on wingwalls over 32 feet
long.
Avoid horizontal wingwall construction joints unless hidden by other
horizontal details. Joints between the barrier and wingwall tend to
become visible over time due to water being carried through the
construction joint by capillary action.
Provide reinforcement through the construction joint at the intersection of
the wing and abutment wall to transfer wingwall loads to the abutment.
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-13
Within the plan set provide wingwall pile loads if they are less than 80%
of the loads in the main portion of the abutment. When listing the total
length of piling for an abutment and a separate wingwall, check if the
wingwall pile needs to be longer than the abutment piles.
Figures 11.1.3.1 through 11.1.3.5 contain details and tables that can be
used to determine the length of straight and 45 wingwalls. Guidance is
provided for parapet and pile bent abutments.
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 11.1.3.1
11-14
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 11.1.3.2
11-15
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 11.1.3.3
11-16
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 11.1.3.4
11-17
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 11.1.3.5
11-18
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 11.1.3.6
11-19
JANUARY 2004
11.1.4 Approach
Panels
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-20
In most cases approach panels are a roadway pay item. Inform the
roadway designers of the appropriate approach panel detail to include in
the roadway plans (for a jointless bridge or for a bridge with expansion
joints).
Also coordinate curb and median transitions with roadway
designers.
Provide 8 inches of width for the abutment blockout or paving bracket,
which supports the approach panel. Place the paving bracket not less
than 1-3 below the top of roadway surface. The reinforcement in the
end block or paving block is shown in Figure 11.1.4.1.
Figure 11.1.4.1
Bridge Approach Treatment
For Mn/DOT repair projects and other projects where no separate grading
plans are prepared, make sure that bridge approach treatments are
consistent with roadway Standard Plan 5-297.233.
Bridge Approach Panel
Details for bridge approach panels for concrete and bituminous roadways
are provided on the roadway Standard Plans 5-297.223 5-297.232.
Use a concrete wearing course on approach panels when the bridge deck
has a concrete wearing course. The wearing course will be placed on the
bridge superstructure and the approach panels at the same time. Include
the wearing course quantity for the approach panels in the superstructure
summary of quantities.
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-21
11.2 Piers
A wide variety of pier types are used in bridge construction. The simplest
may be pile bent piers where a reinforced concrete cap is placed on
piling. A more typical pier type is a cap and column pier. Columns
supported on individual footings support a common cap. The spacing of
columns depends on the superstructure type, the superstructure beam
spacing, and the size of the columns. A typical cap and column pier for a
roadway may have from three to five columns. At times wall piers may
be used to support superstructures. Where extremely tall piers are
required, hollow piers may be considered. Specialty bridges such as
segmental concrete bridges may use double-legged piers to reduce tie
down reactions during segmental construction.
11.2.1 Geometrics
To facilitate the use of standard forms, detail round and rectangular pier
columns and pier caps with outside dimensions that are multiples of 2
inches. As a guide, consider using 2-6 columns for beams 3-0 or less
in depth, 2-8 columns for beams 3-1 to 4-0, 2-10 columns for
beams 4-1 to 5-0, and 3-0 columns for beams over 5-0 unless
larger columns are necessary (for strength or for adequate bearing area).
When laying out piers, consider the economy to be gained from reusing
forms (both standard and non-standard) on different piers constructed as
part of a single contract.
Dimension piles, footing dimensions, and center of columns to working
points.
For pier caps (with cantilevers) supported on multiple columns, space the
columns to balance the dead load moments in the cap.
Label the ends of piers (South end, North end, etc.).
11.2.2 Columns
The minimum column diameter or side of rectangular column is 2-6.
11.2.3 Cap
Slope pier caps in a straight line and utilize concrete pedestal beam seats
1
when possible. Pedestals shall be set back at least 1 /2 inches from the
edge of cap and be no taller than 9 inches. Consider omitting pedestals if
their height is less than 1 inch.
Choose a pier cap width and length that is sufficient to support bearings
and provide adequate edge distances. As a guide, choose a pier cap
depth equal to 1.4 to 1.5 times the width.
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-22
The bottom of the pier cap should be approximately parallel to the top.
1
Taper cantilever ends about /3 of the depth of the cap. When round pier
columns are required, use rounded pier cap ends as well. The ends of
pier caps for other types of pier columns should be flat. Detail solid shaft
(wall) piers with rounded ends for both the cap and shaft.
Integral Steel Box Beam Pier Caps
Avoid the use of steel box beam pier caps whenever possible.
Conventional concrete pier caps or open plate girder pier caps are
preferred.
To ensure that components are constructible, review the design details of
box beam pier caps with the Fabrication Methods Unit and the Structural
Metals Inspection Unit early in the plan development process.
The minimum dimensions of a box pier cap are 3-0 wide by 4-6 high.
Make access openings within the box as large as possible and located to
facilitate use by inspection personnel. The minimum size of access
openings in a box pier cap is 18 x 27 (with radius corners.).
Provide access doors near each end. If possible, locate the door for
ladder access off of the roadway. Orient the hinge for the access doors
such that doors swing away from traffic. Access doors can be placed on
the side of box pier caps if they are protected from superstructure runoff.
If not, locate in the bottom of the cap. Bolt the frame for the door to the
cap in accordance with Bridge Detail Part I B942.
Bolted internal connections are preferred to welded connections.
welds are preferred to full penetration welds.
Fillet
Avoid details that may be difficult to fabricate due to clearance problems.

Assume that welders need an access angle of at least 45 degrees and
require 18 inches of clear working distance to weld a joint. The AISC
Manual of Steel Construction contains tables with entering and tightening
clearance dimensions for bolted connections.
Paint the interior of boxes for inspection visibility and for corrosion
protection. Provide drainage holes with rodent screens at the low points
of the box.
11.2.4 Crash
Walls [3.6.5]
Piers Adjacent to Railways

Piers located within 50 feet of the centerline of railroad tracks are
required to have crash walls incorporated into their design unless they
are protected as specified in LRFD 3.6.5.1.
JANUARY 2004
[AREMA 2.1.5.1
and C-2.1.5.1]
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-23
Piers located within 25 feet of the centerline of railroad tracks must

either be of heavy construction or have crash walls.
A pier is considered to be of heavy construction when it meets all of
the following:
The cross-sectional area of each column is a minimum of 30
square feet.
Each column has a minimum dimension of 2.5 feet.
The larger dimension of all columns is parallel to the railroad
track.
Crash walls must meet the following geometric requirements:
Top of crash wall shall extend a minimum of:
6 feet above top of railroad track when pier is between
12 feet and 25 feet from centerline of tracks.
12 feet above top of railroad track when pier is 12 feet or
less from centerline of tracks.
Bottom of crash wall shall extend a minimum of 4 feet below
ground line.
Crash wall shall extend one foot beyond outermost columns and
be supported on footing.
Face of crash wall shall be located a minimum of 6 inches outside
the face of pier column or wall on railroad side of pier.
Minimum width of crash wall is 2.5 feet.
Minimum length of crash wall is 12 feet.
Piers of heavy construction and crash walls adjacent to railroad tracks
shall be designed for a minimum load of 400 kips.
Piers Adjacent to Roadways
Piers located within 30 feet of the edge of roadway are required to have
crash walls incorporated into their design unless they are protected as
specified in LRFD 3.6.5.1.
Crash walls adjacent to roadways shall be designed for a minimum load
of 400 kips.
11.2.5 Design and

Reinforcement
Include a standard hook at each end of all footing longitudinal and

transverse reinforcement.
Use 90 degree standard hooks to anchor the dowel bars in the
footing/column connection. Show the lap splice length for bent dowels
and check development length of hooked end of dowel bar at
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-24
footing/column interface. Size dowel bars one size larger than column
vertical reinforcement when the dowel bar is detailed to the inside of the
column vertical.
`
Provide the dimensions between the center of column dowel patterns and
the nearest working points.
To simplify construction, detail vertical column reinforcement to rest on
top of the footing.
Columns with a diameter less than or equal to 42 inches shall use spiral
reinforcement. The spiral shall have a 3-inch pitch and be No. 13E.
Extend spirals no less than 2 inches into the pier cap. Use Table 5.2.2.3
to compute the weight of column spiral reinforcement.
Round columns over 42 inches in diameter and square or rectangular
columns shall be designed with tied reinforcement. Ties no smaller than
No. 10E shall be used when the column vertical bars are No. 32E or
smaller. No. 13E or larger ties shall be used for No. 36E, No. 43E, No.
57E, and bundled column vertical bars. The maximum spacing for ties is
12 inches. Place the first tie 6 inches from the face of the footing, crash
wall, or pier cap.
Use standard hooks to develop the top longitudinal reinforcement at the
ends of pier caps.
Provide 2 inches minimum clear distance between anchor rods and
longitudinal reinforcement bars. For piers without anchor rods, provide a
single 6-inch minimum opening between longitudinal reinforcement bars
to facilitate concrete placement.
The maximum size of pier cap stirrups is No. 16E. Use open stirrups
unless torsion loads are large enough to require closed stirrups. If
necessary, use double stirrups to avoid stirrup spacing of less than 4
inches.
Provide No. 13E or No. 16E ties in both directions under bearing
assemblies (6-inch to 8-inch spacing). The clear distance from the top of
reinforcement to the top of the pier cap shall be no less than 2 inches.
Detail ties to clear bearing anchor rods by a minimum of 2 inches.
11.2.6
Miscellaneous
Show an optional construction joint at the top of columns.

All
construction joints should be labeled and the size of keyways identified.
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-25
Detail a /4 inch V-strip on the bottom of pier cap ends to prevent water
from migrating on to substructure components.
Provide a vertical open joint in pier caps that have a total length
exceeding 100 feet. The design may dictate that additional pier cap
joints are necessary to relieve internal forces.
11.2.6.1 Pile Bent
Single line pile bent piers shall be constructed with piles no smaller than
16-inch diameter CIP piles. Refer to Section 10.6 and Figure 10.6.1 for
discussion of the unsupported pile length for pile bent piers.
The preliminary plan may specify
encases the piles from the bottom
provides stability and protects the
piles or CIP piles less than 16
specified.
that a wall is to be provided which

of the cap to the flowline. The wall
piling from debris. In this case, Hinches in diameter are sometimes
11.3 Retaining
Walls
Retaining wall designs need to consider several parameters. These

parameters include:
Height of the wall
Geometry of the wall (curved or straight)
Type of material retained
Geometry of the backfill (level or sloped)
Magnitude of live load surcharge
Whether or not traffic barriers will be incorporated into the top of
the wall (vehicle collision loads)
Whether or not noise walls will be supported on the wall
Location of the water table
Quality of subgrade material (supported on spread footings or pile
foundations).
11.3.1 Cantilever
Retaining Walls
In many cases a conventional reinforced concrete retaining wall is

appropriate solution for a project. For wall heights up to 29 feet,
standard details. Mn/DOT standard cantilever retaining wall designs
details (Bridge Standard Plans Fig. 5-395.200 through 5-395.212)
available for download from the Bridge Office web site.
11.3.2 Counterfort
Retaining Walls
Counterforted retaining walls are economical for wall heights over 40

feet. Counterforted walls are designed to carry loads in two directions.
Earth pressures are carried laterally with horizontal reinforcing to
the
use
and
are
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-26
thickened portions of the wall. The thickened portion of the wall contains
the counterfort, which is designed to contain vertical reinforcement that
carries the overturning loads to the foundation.
11.3.3 Anchored
Walls
General
Anchored walls are used when the height of the earth to be retained by
the wall is considerable and when all other types of retaining walls prove
to be uneconomical. In order to reduce the section of the stem, an
anchoring system is provided at the back of the wall. Anchoring is
typically accomplished by embedding a concrete block dead man in
earth fill and connecting it to the stem of the wall with anchor rods.
Alternatively, the anchors may be incorporated into soil nails or rock
bolts. The feasibility of using anchored walls should be evaluated on a
case-by-case basis after all other types of retaining walls have been ruled
out as an option.
Design and Construction Requirements
The design shall meet the current safety and movement requirements of
Section 11.9 of AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications.
Construction shall be in accordance with Section 7 of AASHTO LRFD
Bridge Construction Specifications, AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design
Specifications and the Mn/DOT Standard Specifications for Construction.
11.3.4
Mechanically
Stabilized Earth
Walls
General
Mechanically stabilized earth walls are reinforced soil retaining wall
systems that consist of vertical or near vertical facing panels, metallic or
polymeric tensile soil reinforcement, and granular backfill. The strength
and stability of mechanically stabilized earth walls derives from the
composite response due to the frictional interaction between the
reinforcement and the granular fill. Mechanically stabilized earth systems
can be classified according to the reinforcement geometry, stress transfer
mechanism, reinforcement material, extensibility of the reinforcement
material, and the type of facing. The AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design
Specifications list three major types of mechanically stabilized earth walls
according to facing type. They are:
1. Precast concrete panel (MSE) walls. An MSE wall, in Mn/DOT
terminology, refers to the precast concrete panel walls. Technical
Memorandum No. 03-16-MRR-06 shall be used for design and
construction of these walls. An approved list of MSE wall systems
is available from the Bridge Office website.
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-27
MSE walls may be used in lieu of conventional gravity, cantilever,

or counterfort retaining walls. MSE walls offer some advantages
when settlement or uplift is anticipated. In some cases MSE walls
offer cost advantages at sites with poor foundation conditions.
This is primarily due to the costs associated with foundation
improvements such as piles and pile caps that may be required to
support conventional wall systems.
In general, MSE walls shall not be used where:

Two walls meet at an angle less than 70.
There is scour or erosion potential that may undermine the
reinforced fill zone or any supporting footing.
Walls have high curvature (radius less than 15 meters (50 feet)).
Soil is contaminated by corrosive material such as acid mine
drainage, other industrial pollutants, or any other condition which
increases corrosion rate such as the presence of stray electrical
currents.
Sites where extensive excavation is required or sites that lack
granular soils and the cost of importing suitable fill material may
render the system uneconomical.
Walls are along shorelines.
Retaining walls support roadways unless an impervious layer is
placed below the roadway surface to drain any surface water away
from the reinforcement.
There is potential for placing buried utilities within the reinforced
zone.
The design of precast panel MSE walls shall meet all the
requirements of the MSE Wall Technical Memorandum.
2. Modular Block Wall (MBW). The facing for this wall is made of
small, rectangular concrete units that have been specially
designed and manufactured for retaining wall applications. MBW
designs shall meet the design requirements of the related Mn/DOT
Technical Memorandum and the Standard sheets (5-297.640, 641,
643, 644, 645).
3. Cast-in-place (CIP) concrete facing with Reinforced Soil Slopes
(RSS). The facing for this wall is cast-in-place concrete. This type
of wall is not approved for use in Mn/DOT projects.
JANUARY 2004
11.3.5
Prefabricated
Modular Walls
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-28
General
Prefabricated modular walls are gravity walls made of interlocking soilfilled concrete or steel modules or bins, rock filled gabion baskets,
precast concrete units or modular block units (without soil
reinforcement).
Prefabricated modular walls shall not be used under the following
conditions:
On curves with radius of less than 800 ft, unless the curve could
be substituted by a series of chords
Steel modular systems shall not be used where the ground water
or surface runoff is acid contaminated or where deicing spray is
anticipated.
Heights greater than 8 feet.
Design and Construction Requirements
The design shall meet the current safety and movement requirements of
Section 11.11 of AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications.
The construction shall be in accordance with Section 7 of AASHTO LRFD
Bridge Construction Specifications, AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design
Specifications and the Mn/DOT Standard Specifications for Construction.
11.3.6 Timber
Noise Walls on
Retaining Walls
11.3.7
Cantilevered Sheet
Pile Walls
Cantilever sheet piling is used in many ways on bridge projects. Most

often it is used to contain fill on a temporary basis for phased
construction activities, as when existing embankments need protection or
new embankments need to be separated from existing facilities during
construction. Sheet piling is also used in the construction of cofferdams.
Most often hot rolled steel sheet piling is used for cantilevered sheet pile
walls.
Hot rolled sections are available from domestic and foreign
sources. Domestically, only PZ22 and PZ27 sections are being rolled.
Securing new domestic material may have a significant lead time. For
many temporary applications, new material is not required and the
contractor may have a supply of used sections.
For applications that are insensitive to water filtration through the
interlocks, cold formed sections may be used. For railway applications,
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-29
check with the railroad as cold formed sections are not allowed by some
railroads.
If temporary sheeting is anticipated for a project the following guidelines
should be followed:
When significant quantities of sheet piling are anticipated, or when an
anchored wall design is required, the wall shall be designed and detailed
in the bridge plans, including the required section modulus and tie back
forces. Also provide an informational schedule of quantities. Payment
for the sheet pile wall shall be made as a stand alone pay item on a lump
sum basis.
For most other instances, the amount and design of sheet pile used will
often depend on the contractors operations. When it is anticipated that
sheet pile will likely be used, show the approximate location of the sheet
pile wall in the plan along with a construction note stating: Payment for
sheet piling shall be considered incidental to other work.
Payment for sheet piling used for typical foundation excavations is
described in the standard special provisions developed for Structure
Excavation and Foundation Preparation and need not be shown in the
plans.
11.3.8 Design
Charts of
Cantilevered Sheet
Pile Soil Retention
Walls for
Temporary
Applications
Design charts suitable for use in preliminary design tasks and

approximating depths for contractor designed sheeting have been
assembled in this section.
The charts are based on a number of
assumptions and contain several limitations. Refer to Figure 11.3.8.1,
Figure 11.3.8.2, and Tables 11.3.8.1 through 11.3.8.4.
DESIGN CHART ASSUMPTIONS
1. A level ground surface has been assumed in front of and behind the
sheet piling.
2. A moist soil unit weight of 120 pounds per cubic foot has been used
through the retained height.
3. The unit weights used below the excavation depth were determined
using the S.P.T. Nvalue vs. unit weight correlation given on the
attached sheet. In the Cohesive Material Case, the average cohesion
value I was divided by 100 to obtain an equivalent S.P.T. N-value and
the correlation between S.P.T. Nvalue and unit weight was used.
4. A uniform vertical surcharge of 240 pounds per square foot has been
used to account for the traffic live load.
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-30
5. In addition to the traffic surcharge load (which results in a uniform

lateral distributed pressure of 80 pounds per square foot), an
equivalent fluid pressure of 40 pounds per cubic foot has been used
throughout the retained height.
6. Coulombs earth pressure theory has been used in the development of
1
the Granular Material Case, assuming a wall friction angle of /3 phi.
The friction angles used were determined using the S.P.T N-value vs.
friction angle correlation given on the attached sheet.
7. A minimum active earth pressure coefficient of 0.25 has been used
below the retained height.
8. The factor of safety for embedment was obtained by reducing the
calculated passive pressure diagram by 33%, which resulted in an
increase in embedment ranging from 26% to 35% for the granular
case and 43% to 80% for the cohesive case. To avoid over-reliance
on the strength of only a few samples, the minimum embedment
used in the charts was limited to no less than 75% of the retained
height.
9. The required section modulus has been computed using 33%
reduction on passive soil pressures and the relationship
fb = 0.66 fy,
where the sheet piling yield stress (fy) is 38,500 pounds per square
inch.
HOW TO USE THE DESIGN CHARTS
Cohesive Material Case
The average Cohesion Value I, to be used in the design chart shall be
taken as the lower of the following:
i)
The average of the C values, within the required embedment
depth indicated on the nearest structure boring log(s).
ii)
The average of the C values in the upper 50% of the required
embedment depth.
In calculating the above averages, an embedment depth (typically equal
to the exposed height) must first be assumed.
If the resulting
embedment depth obtained from the chart is different than that first
assumed, re-calculate the average Cohesion Value using an adjusted
embedment depth. Continue this process until the assumed embedment
depth used in calculating the average Cohesion Value equals the resulting
embedment depth from the chart to within one foot.
To enter the section modulus chart, use the average Cohesion values in
1
the upper /3 of the required embedment.
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-31
Granular Material Case

The average Standard Penetration Blow Count (N), to be used in the
design chart for embedment in the Granular Material Case, shall be taken
as the lower of the following:
i)
The average of the N-values, within the required embedment
depth, indicated on the nearest structure boring log(s).
ii)
The average of the N-values in the upper 50% of the required
embedment depth.
In calculating the above averages, an embedment depth (typically equal
to the exposed height) must first be assumed.
If the resulting
embedment depth obtained from the chart is different than the first
assumed, re-calculate the average Standard Penetration Blow Count
using an adjusted embedment depth. Continue this process until the
assumed embedment used in calculating the average Standard
Penetration Blow Count equals the resulting embedment depth from the
chart to within one foot.
To enter the section modulus chart, use the average N-values in the
1
upper /3 of the required embedment calculated above.
Combined Material Case
If the soil profile within the calculated embedment depth is a combination
of granular and cohesive, divide the Cohesion values of each sample by
100 to determine the embedment using the granular material design
chart.
LIMITATIONS OF DESIGN CHARTS
1. Any sheets not reaching their required embedment due to existing
closed abutment footing must be restrained by developing an
attachment to the existing abutment walls subject to the approval of
the Engineer.
This condition may sometimes also require wale
support. For a maximum retained height of 12 feet and footing heel
width less than or equal to 4 feet, these charts may be used provided
the sheet adjacent to the existing abutment wall is connected to the
abutment wall throughout the retained height.
2. The Design Charts are not applicable if the calculated sheet piling tip
elevation falls in material with a Cohesive Value larger than 4500
pounds per square foot, an N-value larger than 45 blows, or rock,
since the sheet piling may not get the necessary embedment to work
as a cantilever.
3. If upon calculating the average soil strength for cohesive soils in the
1
1
upper /3 of the embedment, the lower soil strength in that /3 is
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-32
1
larger than 2 times the upper soil strength in the same /3 of

embedment, the section modulus in the chart should be amplified
according to the following schedule:
Lower Soil/Upper Soil Strength Ratio
Section Modulus Amplification Factor
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
Soil Strength Ratios should be rounded to the nearest whole number.

4. The charts attempt to provide a simple procedure to yield a quick
design with adequate safety factor.
Considering the extreme
variability in soil conditions and in boring data interpretation, it is
conceivable that the use of the charts can yield erroneous results.
The engineer must always use good judgment in soil data
interpretation and the use of the charts.
If the chart design
procedure results in a blank location on the chart, a cantilever design
may still be possible with more rigorous analysis.
5. If any of the site conditions do not meet or are not consistent with the
Design Chart Assumptions, the design charts are no longer
applicable and should not be used.
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-33
Figure 11.3.8.1 ASSUMED RELATIONSHIP OF BLOW COUNT AND FRICTION ANGLE,

MOIST & SATURATED UNIT WEIGHT
BLOW COUNT VS FRICTION ANGLE ""
FRICTION ANGLE"" (DEGREES)
38.0
36.0
34.0
32.0
2
=21[e(Ln(N)+4) /100]
30.0
28.0
26.0
0
2.5
7.5
10
12.5
15
17.5
20
22.5
25
27.5
30
32.5
BLOW COUNT "N" (BLOWS/FT)
BLOW COUNT VS UNIT WEIGHT

MOIST & SATURATED
140
UNIT WEIGHT "" (POUND/FT3)
135
Saturated Unit Weight = 105 (N)
130
0.07
125
120
Moist Unit Weight = 95 (N)
115
0.095
110
105
100
0
2.5
7.5
10
12.5
15
17.5
20
22.5
25
BLOW COUNT "N" (BLOWS/FT)
27.5
30
32.5
35
35
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 11.3.8.2 - Typical Sheet Pile Configuration
JANUARY 2004
11-34
AVERAGE COHESION C (PSF)
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
1300
1400
1500
1600
1700
1800
1900
2000
2100
2200
2300
2400
2500
1.1
900
1200
1.1
800
1.0
1.1
700
1100
1.2
600
1.0
1.3
500
1000
1.4
400
1.5
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.4
2.4
2.4
2.5
2.5
2.6
2.7
2.8
3.0
3.3
4.7
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.4
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
3.8
3.9
4.1
4.5
5.1
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.4
4.4
4.4
4.5
4.5
4.6
4.7
4.7
4.8
4.9
5.1
5.3
5.5
5.9
6.4
8.3
5.7
5.7
5.7
5.8
5.8
5.8
5.9
5.9
6.0
6.1
6.2
6.3
6.4
6.5
6.7
6.9
7.2
7.5
8.1
9.0
10
7.3
7.4
7.4
7.5
7.5
7.6
7.7
7.7
7.8
7.9
8.1
8.2
8.4
8.6
8.8
9.1
9.5
10.1
10.9
13.5
11
9.4
9.4
9.5
9.5
9.6
9.7
9.8
9.9
10.0
10.2
10.3
10.5
10.8
11.0
11.4
11.8
12.4
13.2
14.8
12
11.7
11.8
11.9
12.0
12.1
12.2
12.3
12.5
12.6
12.8
13.0
13.3
13.6
14.0
14.5
15.1
15.9
17.0
20.5
13
14.4
14.5
14.6
14.8
14.9
15.1
15.2
15.4
15.7
15.9
16.2
16.6
17.0
17.5
18.2
19.0
20.1
22.3
14
17.6
17.7
17.9
18.0
18.2
18.4
18.6
18.9
19.2
19.5
19.9
20.4
21.0
21.6
22.5
23.6
25.2
29.6
15
21.2
21.3
21.5
21.7
22.0
22.2
22.5
22.8
23.2
23.7
24.2
24.8
25.5
26.4
27.6
29.0
31.9
42.8
16
25.2
25.5
25.7
26.0
26.3
26.6
27.0
27.4
27.9
28.4
29.1
29.9
30.8
32.0
33.5
35.1
41.1
17
29.8
30.1
30.4
30.7
31.1
31.5
32.0
32.5
33.2
33.9
34.7
35.7
36.9
38.4
40.3
44.5
55.2
18
35.0
35.3
35.7
36.1
36.6
37.1
37.7
38.4
39.1
40.0
41.1
42.3
43.9
45.7
49.0
55.4
19
40.8
41.2
41.6
42.2
42.7
43.4
44.1
44.9
45.9
47.0
48.3
49.8
51.7
54.1
59.3
20
47.2
47.7
48.3
48.9
49.6
50.3
51.2
52.2
53.4
54.8
56.4
58.3
60.6
21
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.7
1.7
1.8
1.8
2.0
2.1
2.4
RETAINED HEIGHT (FEET)
REQUIRED SECTION MODULUS (in.3/ft.)
Table 11.3.8.1 TEMPORARY SHEET PILING DESIGN CHART GRANULAR MATERIAL CASE
JANUARY 2004
11-35
AVERAGE STANDARD PENETRATION RESISTANCE N-VALUE (BLOW COUNT PER FOOT)
9.7
9.4
9.1
8.8
8.6
8.3
8.1
8.0
7.8
7.7
7.5
7.4
7.3
7.1
7.0
7.0
6.9
6.8
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
10.7
6
10.2
11.3
5
7
12.1
7.8
8.9
9.0
9.1
9.2
9.3
9.5
9.6
9.8
10.0
10.2
10.4
10.6
10.9
11.2
11.5
11.8
12.2
12.7
13.2
13.8
14.6
15.7
9.9
10.0
10.1
10.3
10.4
10.6
10.7
10.9
11.1
11.3
11.6
11.8
12.1
12.4
12.8
13.2
13.6
14.1
14.7
15.4
16.3
17.5
10.9
11.0
11.2
11.3
11.5
11.7
11.8
12.1
12.3
12.5
12.8
13.1
13.4
13.7
14.1
14.5
15.0
15.6
16.2
17.0
18.0
19.3
11.9
12.1
12.2
12.4
12.5
12.7
13.0
13.2
13.4
13.7
14.0
14.3
14.6
15.0
15.4
15.9
16.4
17.0
17.7
18.6
19.7
21.0
10
13.0
13.1
13.3
13.5
13.6
13.9
14.1
14.3
14.6
14.9
15.2
15.5
15.9
16.3
16.8
17.3
17.8
18.5
19.3
20.2
21.4
22.9
11
14.0
14.2
14.3
14.5
14.7
14.9
15.2
15.5
15.7
16.0
16.4
16.7
17.1
17.6
18.1
18.6
19.2
19.9
20.8
21.8
23.0
24.6
12
15.0
15.2
15.4
15.6
15.8
16.0
16.3
16.6
16.9
17.2
17.6
18.0
18.4
18.8
19.4
20.0
20.6
21.4
22.3
23.4
24.7
26.4
13
16.0
16.2
16.4
16.6
16.8
17.1
17.4
17.7
18.0
18.4
18.8
19.2
19.6
20.1
20.7
21.3
22.0
22.8
23.8
24.9
26.3
28.2
14
17.1
17.2
17.4
17.7
17.9
18.2
18.5
18.8
19.2
19.5
19.9
20.4
20.9
21.4
22.0
22.6
23.4
24.3
25.3
26.5
28.0
30.0
15
18.1
18.3
18.5
18.7
19.0
19.3
19.6
19.9
20.3
20.7
21.1
21.6
22.1
22.7
23.3
24.0
24.8
25.7
26.8
28.1
29.7
31.7
16
19.1
19.3
19.5
19.8
20.0
20.4
20.7
21.1
21.4
21.9
22.3
22.8
23.3
23.9
24.6
25.3
26.2
27.1
28.3
29.6
31.3
17
20.1
20.3
20.6
20.8
21.1
21.5
21.8
22.2
22.6
23.0
23.5
24.0
24.6
25.2
25.9
26.7
18
21.1
21.4
21.6
21.9
22.2
22.5
22.9
23.3
23.7
19
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
7.9
8.0
8.1
8.2
8.4
8.5
8.7
8.8
9.0
9.2
9.4
9.6
9.9
10.1
10.4
10.8
11.2
11.7
12.3
13.0
13.9
REQUIRED EMBEDMENT DEPTH (FEET)
Table 11.3.8.2 TEMPORARY SHEET PILING DESIGN CHART GRANULAR MATERIAL CASE
JANUARY 2004
11-36
AVERAGE STANDARD PENETRATION RESISTANCE N-VALUE (BLOW COUNT PER FOOT)

IN UPPER 1/3 OF REQUIRED EMBEDMENT
3.1
2.9
2.8
2.7
2.7
2.6
2.5
2.5
2.4
2.4
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.1
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
3.4
6
3.2
3.7
5
7
4.0
3.3
4.8
4.9
4.9
5.0
5.0
5.1
5.2
5.3
5.4
5.5
5.6
5.7
5.8
6.0
6.2
6.4
6.6
6.9
7.2
7.6
8.2
8.9
6.7
6.8
6.9
6.9
7.0
7.1
7.2
7.3
7.5
7.6
7.8
7.9
8.1
8.4
8.6
8.9
9.2
9.6
10.1
10.6
11.4
12.4
9.1
9.2
9.3
9.3
9.5
9.6
9.7
9.9
10.1
10.3
10.5
10.7
11.0
11.2
11.6
11.9
12.4
12.9
13.5
14.3
15.3
16.7
11.9
12.0
12.1
12.3
12.4
12.6
12.8
13.0
13.2
13.5
13.7
14.0
14.4
14.7
15.2
15.6
16.2
16.9
17.7
18.7
20.0
21.8
10
15.3
15.4
15.6
15.7
15.9
16.1
16.4
16.6
16.9
17.2
17.6
18.0
18.4
18.9
19.4
20.0
20.8
21.6
22.6
23.9
25.6
27.9
11
19.2
19.4
19.5
19.7
20.0
20.2
20.6
20.9
21.3
21.6
22.1
22.6
23.1
23.7
24.4
25.2
26.1
27.1
28.4
30.0
32.1
35.0
12
23.7
23.9
24.2
24.4
24.7
25.0
25.4
25.8
26.3
26.8
27.3
27.9
28.5
29.3
30.1
31.1
32.2
33.5
35.1
37.1
39.7
43.2
13
28.9
29.2
29.4
29.7
30.1
30.5
31.0
31.5
32.0
32.6
33.2
34.0
34.8
35.7
36.7
37.8
39.2
40.8
42.8
45.2
48.3
52.5
14
34.8
35.1
35.4
35.8
36.2
36.7
37.3
37.9
38.5
39.2
40.0
40.9
41.8
42.9
44.1
45.5
47.2
49.1
51.4
54.3
58.1
15
41.4
41.8
42.2
42.6
43.1
43.7
44.3
45.1
45.8
46.7
47.6
48.6
49.8
51.1
52.5
54.2
56.1
58.4
16
48.8
49.3
49.7
50.2
50.8
51.5
52.3
53.1
54.0
55.0
56.1
57.3
58.7
60.2
17
57.1
57.6
58.1
58.7
59.3
50.2
18
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
3.3
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.6
3.7
3.7
3.8
3.9
4.0
4.1
4.2
4.4
4.5
4.7
5.0
5.3
5.6
6.1
REQUIRED SECTION MODULUS (in.3/ft.)
Table 11.3.8.3 TEMPORARY SHEET PILING DESIGN CHART COHESIVE MATERIAL CASE
JANUARY 2004
11-37
AVERAGE COHESION C (PSF)
3.8
3.8
3.8
3.8
3.8
3.8
3.8
3.8
3.8
3.8
3.8
3.8
3.8
3.8
1300
1400
1500
1600
1700
1800
1900
2000
2100
2200
2300
2400
2500
3.8
900
1200
3.8
800
3.8
3.8
700
1100
4.3
600
3.8
5.1
500
1000
6.5
400
4.5
5.3
5.3
5.3
5.3
5.3
5.3
5.3
5.3
5.3
5.3
5.3
5.3
5.3
5.3
5.3
5.3
5.3
5.5
6.2
7.2
9.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.1
6.8
7.7
9.1
13.1
6.8
6.8
6.8
6.8
6.8
6.8
6.8
6.8
6.8
6.8
6.8
6.8
6.8
6.8
6.8
6.8
7.4
8.3
9.4
11.6
7.5
7.5
7.5
7.5
7.5
7.5
7.5
7.5
7.5
7.5
7.5
7.5
7.5
7.5
7.5
8.0
8.8
9.9
11.4
16.1
10
8.3
8.3
8.3
8.3
8.3
8.3
8.3
8.3
8.3
8.3
8.3
8.3
8.3
8.3
8.5
9.3
10.3
11.6
14.2
11
9.0
9.0
9.0
9.0
9.0
9.0
9.0
9.0
9.0
9.0
9.0
9.0
9.0
9.1
9.9
10.8
12.0
13.9
19.1
12
9.8
9.8
9.8
9.8
9.8
9.8
9.8
9.8
9.8
9.8
9.8
9.8
9.8
10.4
11.3
12.4
13.9
16.7
13
10.5
10.5
10.5
10.5
10.5
10.5
10.5
10.5
10.5
10.5
10.5
10.5
11.0
11.8
12.9
14.2
16.3
22.1
14
13.8
15.0
16.4
18.8
25.2
16
11.3
11.3
11.3
11.3
11.3
11.3
11.3
11.3
11.3
11.3
11.3
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.1
11.5 12.9
12.4
13.4
14.5
16.3
19.5
15
12.8
12.8
12.8
12.8
12.8
12.8
12.8
12.8
12.8
12.8
13.5
14.4
15.4
16.7
18.7
22.3
17
13.5
13.5
13.5
13.5
13.5
13.5
13.5
13.5
13.5
14.0
14.9
15.9
17.1
18.7
21.3
28.2
18
14.3
14.3
14.3
14.3
14.3
14.3
14.3
14.3
14.6
15.4
16.4
17.5
18.9
21.1
25.2
19
15.0
15.0
15.0
15.0
15.0
15.0
15.0
15.1
15.9
16.9
17.9
19.2
21.1
23.7
31.3
20
15.8
15.8
15.8
15.8
15.8
15.8
15.8
16.5
17.4
18.4
19.6
21.2
23.5
28.1
21
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.9
5.7
6.8
10.0
REQUIRED EMBEDMENT DEPTH (FEET)
Table 11.3.8.4 TEMPORARY SHEET PILING DESIGN CHART COHESIVE MATERIAL CASE
JANUARY 2004
11-38
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-39
11.4 Design
Examples
Section 11 concludes with three design examples. The examples are a high
parapet abutment supported on piling, a retaining wall supported on a spread
footing, and a three column pier.
11.4.1
High Parapet
Abutment
Design Example
This example illustrates the design of a high parapet abutment. After

determination of dead, earth, and live load components, five load
combinations are assembled (two strength load cases during
construction, two strength load cases for the completed abutment, and a
service load case for the completed abutment.) After which, the capacity
of an assumed pile group is evaluated. Subsequently, the flexural design
of the footing, stem, and backwall is presented. The shear capacity of
the footing is also checked. A typical cross-section for the abutment is
provided in Figure 11.4.1.1.
Figure 11.4.1.1
JANUARY 2004
[Mn/DOT LRFD
Design Manual
6.9, 14.8.2]
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-40
The design parameters for the example are:

1) This example is a continuation of the plate girder and expansion
1
bearing design examples. The superstructure consists of a 9 /2
deck on 5 steel girders with a beam spacing of 11-4 and a skew
of 20. The height of the backwall is 6-9.
2) The abutment is supported on cast-in-place piling (12-inch
diameter).
3) The abutment supports a 20-foot long, 1-foot thick approach
panel that is partially supported by the top of the backwall and
partially supported by subgrade material.
Material and design parameters used in this example are presented in
Table 11.4.1.1.
Table 11.4.1.1
Unit Weights
Concrete
Reinforcement
A. Evaluate Pile
Bearing Capacity
Soil
0.120 kcf
Reinforced Concrete
0.150 kcf
Compressive Strength, fc
4.0 ksi
Crack Control, Z
170 kip/in
29,000 ksi
Yield Strength, Fy
60 ksi
The Bridge Construction Units Recommendations for the foundations are

referenced at the start of final design. The recommendations identify the
appropriate design capacity and resistance factor to be used.
Nominal Capacity, Q n
225 tons/pile
Resistance Factor, = 0.45

Bearing Resistance, Q r = Q n = 0.45 225
=
=
101 tons/pile
202 kips/pile
Figure 11.4.1.2 shows a plan view of the abutment and includes an

assumed pile layout for the example. Pile Rows I and II contain eight
piles, while Row III contains seven piles. Avoid pile layouts that permit
individual piles to go into tension.
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 11.4.1.2
11-41
JANUARY 2004
B. Permanent
Loads (DC & EV)
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-42
Calculate the dead loads:

Backwall:
Pbw = 0.150 1.50 6.75 54.27 = 82.4 kips
Stem:
Pst = 0.150 4.5 15.25 54.27 = 558.6 kips
Footing (to simplify load calculations, weight of step is included in stem):

Pf = 0.150 (4 11.0 + 4.25 4) 55.33 = 506.3 kips
Approach Panel (Assume half carried by the abutment):

20
48
Pap = 0.150 1
o = 76.6 kips
2 cos 20
Expansion Joint Block:
Pejb = 0.150 1.25 1.33
51.33
cos 20
13.6 kips
Superstructure Dead Load (DC1 + DC2 reactions from the Plate Girder
Example):
Psuper = (95 + 22 ) (5 girders ) = 585.0 kips
Wingwall DL (Assume 5 feet of the wing walls beyond the footing are
carried by the abutment. Also assume the corner fillet weight is balanced
by the taper in the wing wall.):
6.5
Pwing = 0.150 2 1.50

+ 5 (15.25 + 6.75 + 1.25)
cos 20
= 124.7 kips
Railing DL:
Prail = 0.439 2 5 +
6.5 + 0.67 + 1.33

cos 20
= 12.3 kips
Summing the dead loads,

PDC = 82.4 + 558.6 + 506.3 + 76.6 + 13.6 + 585.0 + 124.7 + 12.3
= 1959.5 kips
Calculate vertical earth pressure (EV) of fill above the footing:
On the Heel:
48.0
PEV = 0.120 (15.25 + 6.75) 6.5
o = 876.5 kips
cos 20
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-43
On the Toe:
3.75 + 1.75
4 55.33 = 73.0 kips
2
PEV = 0.120
Figure 11.4.1.3 summarizes the permanent loads and includes moment

arms measured from the toe of the footing.
Figure 11.4.1.3
C. Earth Pressure
(EH)
[3.11.5]
The active earth pressure values used for the equivalent fluid method
(described in LRFD Article 3.11.5.5) range from 0.030 kcf to 0.035 kcf.
Assuming a level backfill, Mn/DOT practice is to use:
eq = 0.033 kcf
The respective horizontal active earth pressures at the top and bottom of
the abutment are:
ptop = 0 ksf
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-44
pbottom = eq h = 0.033 26.25 = 0.866 ksf
48
= 580.6 kips
cos 20
PEH = 0.5 0.866 26.25
The force acts at a location of /3 times the height of the load:

0.33 26.25 = 8.66 ft
Passive earth pressure in front of the abutment is neglected in the
design. Figure 11.4.1.3 illustrates the horizontal earth pressure loading.
D. Live Load
Surcharge (LS)
[3.11.6]
The live load surcharge is applied to the abutment during construction. It

represents construction activity on the fill behind the abutment prior to
construction of the approach panel.
P = eq heq
From Table 3.11.6.4-1, use a surcharge height of 2.0 feet.
2
P = 0.033 2.0 = 0.066 kips/ft
Horizontal Resultant of LS is:

48
PLS = 0.066 26.25
= 88.5 kips
cos 20o
Figure 11.4.1.3 illustrates the horizontal pressure loading associated with
the live load surcharge.
E. Live Load (LL)
From the Plate Girder Design Example (Table 6.9.11) the maximum live
load reaction without dynamic load allowance at the abutment is:
RLL = 66 + 42 = 108 kips/lane
Coincident with live load on the superstructure, lane loading is applied to
the approach panel. Use the same distribution that was used for dead
load (assume that one half of the total load is carried by the abutment
and the other half is carried in direct bearing to the subgrade away from
the abutment):
1
0.64 20 = 6.4 kips/lane
2
[Table 3.6.1.1.2-1]
For maximum loading, four lanes of traffic are placed on the

superstructure and approach panel. The multiple presence factor for
more than 3 design lanes is 0.65. For simplicity, add the live load from
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-45
the approach panel to the live load from the superstructure and apply the
total at the centerline of bearing:
PLL = (108 + 6.4 ) 4 0.65 = 297.4 kips
Table 11.4.1.2 Vertical Load Components and Moments about
Toe of Footing
Load
DC
EV
LL
Label
P
(kips)
Distance To
Moment
Toe
About Toe
(ft)
(kip-ft)
Backwall
Pbw
82.4
-7.75
-638.6
Stem
Pst
558.6
-6.25
-3491.3
Footing
Pf
506.3
-7.41
-3751.7
Approach Panel
Pap.
76.6
-8.17
-625.8
Expansion Joint Block
Pejb
13.6
-7.17
-97.5
Superstructure DL
Psuper
585.0
-5.50
-3217.5
Railing
Prail
12.3
-13.25
-163.0
Wingwall
Pwing
124.7
-14.10
-1758.3
Total
1959.5
Backfill on Heel
PEV(HEEL)
876.5
-11.75
-10298.9
Fill on Toe
PEV(TOE)
73.0
-2.24
-163.5
Total
949.5
PLL
297.4
Live Load
-13743.7
-10462.4
-5.50
-1635.7
Table 11.4.1.3 Horizontal Load Components and Moments about

Bottom of Footing
Load
F. Select
Applicable Load
Combinations and
Factors For Pile
Design
[3.4.1]
Distance to
Moment
Toe
About Toe
Type
Description
Label
(kips)
(ft)
(kip-ft)
EH
Horizontal Earth Load
PEH
580.6
8.66
5028.0
LS
Live Load Surcharge
PLS
88.5
13.13
1162.0
Assemble the appropriate load factor values to be used for each of the
load combinations. Load combinations for the Strength I Limit State are
used. The load cases considered for the design example are:
All load modifiers = 1.0.
Strength I: Construction Case 1
0.90 DC + 1.00 EV + 1.5 EH + 1.75 LS
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-46
For this construction case, DC does not contain any superstructure or

approach panel dead loads. It also assumes that the abutment is
backfilled prior to superstructure erection.
1.25 DC
For this construction case, DC includes the superstructure but does
not include the approach panel. It assumes the superstructure is
erected prior to the abutment being backfilled.
Strength I: Final Case 1
1.25 DC + 1.35 EV + 0.90 EH + 1.75 LL
This load case represents the completed structure with the minimum
load factor for the horizontal earth pressure load.
1.25 DC + 1.35 EV + 1.50 EH + 1.75 LL
This load case represents the completed structure with the maximum
load factor for the horizontal earth pressure load.
Table 11.4.1.4 contains the load factors that are used for each load
component for each load case.
Table 11.4.1.4 Load Factors
DC
Final 2
Strength I:
Final 1
Strength I:
Constr. 2
Strength I:
Constr. I
Strength I:
Component
Load
Load Combination
Load
JANUARY 2004
Pbw
0.90
1.25
1.25
1.25
Pst
0.90
1.25
1.25
1.25
Pf
0.90
1.25
1.25
1.25
Pap
1.25
1.25
Pejb
0.90
1.25
1.25
1.25
Psuper
1.25
1.25
1.25
Prail
0.90
1.25
1.25
1.25
Pwing
0.90
1.25
1.25
1.25
PEV(heel)
1.00
1.35
1.35
PEV(toe)
1.00
1.35
1.35
EH
PEH
1.5
0.90
1.50
LS
PLS
1.75
LL
PLL
1.75
1.75
EV
JANUARY 2004
G. Design Piles
[10.7.1.5]
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-47
Table 11.4.1.5 lists the net vertical, horizontal, and moment forces that
are applied to the pile group for each of the four load combinations.
Table 11.4.1.5 Force Resultants
Vertical
Horizontal
Moment about
Load P
Load H
Toe Mtoe
(kips)
(kips)
(kip-ft)
2118
1026
-9797
2354
-16,397
4252
523
-29,641
4252
871
-26,624
Check Vertical Capacity of Pile Group

Determine the properties of the pile group. These properties include the
number of piles, the location of the centroid or neutral axis with respect
to the toe, and the moment of inertia of each pile row.
Table 11.4.1.6 Pile Group Properties
Pile Group Properties
Piles Per Row (N)
Row Number
I
II
III
Distance to Toe (dtoe)
1.25
6.0
13.75
Ndtoe
10.00
48.00
96.25
Neutral Axis of Pile Group to
(Ndtoe)/ N
Toe (XNA)
Distance from Neutral Axis
to Pile Row (d)
2
I = Nd
Sum
23
154.25
6.71
5.46
0.71
-7.04
238.5
4.0
346.9
589.4
Using solid mechanics equations adapted for discrete elements, the

forces in the pile rows for different load combinations are determined.
The force in each pile row is found using:
P M
Pile load = + NA
N
I
First, the moment about the toe must be translated to get the moment
about the neutral axis of the pile group. For Strength I: Construction
Case I, the eccentricity about the toe is
M toe
9797
e toe =
=
= 4.63 ft
P
2118
Then the eccentricity about the neutral axis of the pile group is
eNA = x NA + e toe = 6.71 4.63 = 2.08 ft
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-48
The moment about the neutral axis of the pile group becomes
MNA = P eNA = 2118 (2.08) = 4405 kip ft
Then Pile LoadRowI =
Pile Load
RowII
Pile Load
23
2118
23
2118
4405(5.46)
589.4
4405(0.71)
589.4
= 132.9 kips/pile
= 97.4 kips/pile
4405(-7.04 )
= 39.5 kips/pile
23
589.4
The same calculations were carried out for the other load cases.
RowIII
2118
A summary of MNA and the pile loads are provided in Table 11.4.1.7.
Table 11.4.1.7 Pile Reactions
Moment
Pile Loads (kips/pile)
Load Combination
about N.A. of
pile group
Row I
Row II
Row III
MNA
(kip-ft)
132.9
97.4
39.5
4405
96.7
101.6
109.7
-612
174.6
183.5
198.1
-1106
202.6
187.2
162.0
1913
The largest pile load is 202.6 kips/pile (101.3 tons/pile), which is only
0.3% greater than the bearing resistance of 202 kips. Therefore, the pile
layout is considered satisfactory for bearing.
Check Lateral Capacity of Pile Group
The maximum factored horizontal load from Table 11.4.1.5 is
H = 1026 kips
From Section 10.2, assume a lateral resistance of 18 kips/pile plus the

resistance due to the two rows of battered piles.
3
= 1198 kips > 1026 kips
OK
R H = 23 (18) + 16 (202)
2
2
3 + 12
Pile Load Table for Plan
Piling are driven until dynamic equation measurements indicate the pile
has reached refusal or the required design load indicated in the plan. The
service load resistance is monitored in the field using the Mn/DOT
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-49
modified ENR formula given in Section 2452.3E of the Mn/DOT Standard

Specifications For Construction, 2000 Edition. Designers must calculate
the service pile load for the worst load case (Strength I: Final Case 2)
and show in the plan, using the Standard Plan Note table for abutments
with piling (see Appendix 2-H).
For Strength I: Final Case 2,
Pserv = 1959.5 + 949.5 + 297.4 = 3206 kips
Mserv toe = -13743.7 - 10462.4 - 1635.7 + 5028.0 = -20,814 kip - ft
e serv toe =
Mserv toe
Pserv
20,814
3206
= -6.49 ft
eserv NA = xNA + e serv toe = 6.71 - 6.49 = 0.22 ft

Mserv NA = Pserv e serv NA = 3206 (0.22 ) = 705 kip - ft
Service Pile LoadRow I =
3206
23
705 (5.46 )
589.4
= 145.9 kips/pile = 73.0 tons/pile
Also, compute average load factor:

101.3
Avg. Load Factor =
= 1.388
73.0
For load table, separate pile load due to factored live load from other
factored loads:
Factored PLL = 1.75 (297.4 ) = 521 kips
Factored MLL NA = 521 (6.71 - 5.50 ) = 630 kip - ft
Factored Pile LoadLLRow I =
521
23
630 (5.46 )
589.4
= 28.5 kips/pile = 14.3 tons/pile
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-50
The final results to be shown in the plan are:

ABUTMENT
BOTH ABUTMENTS
Factored Dead load + Earth Pressure
101.3
1.388
87.0
Factored Live Load
14.3
Factored Total Load
101.3
* Design Load
73.0
= 73.0 tons/pile
1.388 is Average Load Factor for Strength I Load Combination
H. Check Shear in
Footing
[5.8.2.9]
General practice is to size the thickness of footings such that shear steel
is not required. Try a 48 inch thick footing with a 3 inch step at the toe.
Determine dv
Based on past design experience assume the bottom mat of steel is #29
2
bars spaced at 12 inches (As = 1.0 in /ft). The effective shear depth of
the section (dv) is computed to determine the shear capacity of the
footing. The location of the flexural reinforcement is used to determine
dv. The piling has an embedment depth of one foot. Mn/DOT practice is
to place the bottom mat of reinforcement directly on top of piling
embedded one foot or less. Consequently the cover on the bottom
reinforcement is much greater than that on the top mat and will control
the computations for dv. The greater of two equations is used to
compute the dv value. Note that the 0.72h criterion is not used in this
case because the flexural reinforcement location is so high above the
bottom of the footing.
Begin by determining the depth of flexural reinforcement:

d
toe
dv
= 51 12 1.128 = 38.44 in.
2
2

= (thickness) (pile embedment)
dheel = 48 12
1.128
2
= 35.44 in
The depth of the compression block is:

A s fy
1.00 60
a=
=
= 1.47 in
'
0.85 f b 0.85 4 12
c
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-51
The effective shear depth is:

a
1.47
d vtoe = d = 38.44
= 37.71 in
2
2
dvheel = 35.44
1.47
2
= 34.71 in
It need be no less than 0.9de :

For toe, 0.9 de = 0.9 d toe = 0.9 38.44 = 34.90 in
For heel, 0.9 de = 0.9 d
heel
= 0.9 35.44 = 31.90 in
Use dvtoe = 37.71 in and dvheel = 34.71 in
[5.13.3.6.1]
[5.8.3.2]
Check One-Way Shear in Footing

The critical section is located dv from the face of the abutment. The
center line of the Row III piles is 63 inches from the back face of
abutment. Therefore, the entire load from the Row III piles contributes
to shear on the critical section. Ignore the beneficial effects of the
vertical earth loads and footing self weight:
Pile Reaction 198.1
VuRow III =
=
= 22.6 kips/ft width
Pile Spacing
8.75
The center line of the Row I piles is 33 inches from the front face of
abutment. Therefore, only a portion of the load from the Row I piles
contributes to shear on the critical section. See Figure 11.4.1.4.
Figure 11.4.1.4 Partial Footing Plan
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-52
Pile Reaction
VuRow I = (Pile Fraction Outside Critical Section)

Pile Spacing
1.29 202.6
= 2.9 kips/ft width

12 7.50
VuRow I =
The shear due to the Row III piles governs.

[5.8.3.3]
There is no shear reinforcement, so the nominal shear capacity of the

footing is:
Vn = Vc
An upper limit is placed on the maximum nominal shear capacity a
section can carry. The maximum design shear for the footing heel is:
Vn = 0.25 f'c b v dv = 0.25 4.0 12.0 34.71 = 416.5 kips
The concrete shear capacity of a section is:
Vc = 0.0316 f' c b v d v
In order to determine , start by calculating the strain . For sections
x
without shear reinforcement,
Mu
+ 0.5 Nu + 0.5 (Vu Vp ) cot A ps fpo
d
= v
x
E s A s + Ep A ps
The critical section for moment is the face of the abutment, so

Mu = Vu (Moment Arm) = 22.6 (5.25) = 118.7 kip - ft/ft
Nu = Vp = A ps = fpo = Ep = A ps = 0
Assume = 53.0 degrees

Then
118.7 (12 )
34.71 + 0.5 (22.6 )(cot 53.0 )

3
=
= 1.71 10
x
29,000 1.00
Next, determine crack spacing parameter s xe

ag = 1.5 inches
sx = dv = 34.71 inches
Then
s xe = s x
1.38
a + 0.63 = 34.71 1.50 + 0.63 = 22.49 in < 80 in

g
1.38
OK
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-53
With
and s xe determined, interpolate to find and in LRFD
x
Table 5.8.3.4.2 2.
= 53.3 degrees, which is close to the assumed angle
= 1.38
For a 1 ft. wide section, substituting values into Vc equation produces:
Vc = 0.0316 1.38 4 12 34.71 = 36.3 kips
This results in:
Vn = Vc = 36.3 kips < 416.5 kips
OK
Including the shear resistance factor, the shear capacity is found to be:
Vr = Vn = 0.90 36.3 = 32.7 kips > 22.6 kips
OK
[5.13.3.6.1]
Check Two-Way Shear in Footing

Punching of an individual pile through the abutment footing is checked
next. The critical section for two-way shear is located at 0.5 dv from the
perimeter of the pile. The Row I pile at the acute corner is governing
case because it has the shortest length of critical section. See Figure
11.4.1.5.
Figure 11.4.1.5 Partial Footing Plan
Measured from a CADD drawing, the length of the critical section

b o = 61.4 in
[5.13.3.6.3]
( )
Vn = 0.126 f' c b o d v = (0.90 )(0.126 ) 4 (61.4 )(34.71) = 483.4 kips

Vu = Row I Factored Pile Load = 202.6 kips < 483.4 kips
OK
JANUARY 2004
I. Design Footing
Reinforcement
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-54
The critical section for flexure in the footing is located at the face of the
stem for both the top and bottom transverse reinforcement.
1. Top Transverse Reinforcement
Design For Strength Limit State
The design moment for the top transverse bars is found by assuming the
heel acts as a cantilever supporting its self weight and the weight of the
earth resting on it. In cases where the required reinforcement to resist
these loads seems excessive, the moment due to the minimum back pile
reaction may be included to decrease the top mat design moment. Use
the maximum load factors for DC and EV.
The distributed load associated with the self weight of the footing heel is:
w ftg = (thickness ) (width) = 0.150 4.0 1.0 = 0.60 kips/ft
A heel length of 6.5 feet produces a moment of:

MDC = w ftg L
L
2
= 0.60
6.5
= 12.7 kip - ft
The distributed load associated with fill on top of the footing heel is:
wEV = 0.120 (15.25 + 6.75) 1.0 = 3.64 kips/ft
The associated moment in the footing at the stem is:
MEV = 2.64
6.52
= 55.8 kip - ft
2
Combining loads to determine the design moment produces:

Mu = 1.25 MDC + 1.35 MEV = 1.25 12.7 + 1.35 55.8 = 91.2 kip - ft
Determining the depth of the flexural reinforcement:
d
d = (thickness ) (cover) b
2
[5.7.3.2]
1.128
= 48 3
= 44.44 in.
2
Solve for the required area of reinforcing steel:
Mr = Mn = A s fy d
Mu
2 0.85 f' c b
A s fy
Then for fc = 4.0 ksi and = 0.90,

A s 60 1
Mu = 0.90 A s 60 d
1
.
7 4 12 12
which can be rearranged to:

2
3.309 A s 4.5 d A s + Mu = 0
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-55
The required area of steel can be found by solving for the smaller root in
the quadratic equation.
As =
4.5 d 20.25 d2 13.236 Mu

6.618
2
The required area of steel is 0.46 in /ft.

2
(As = 0.60 in /ft).
[5.7.3.3.1]
Try #22 bars at 12 inches

No more than 42 percent of the flexural cross section can be in
compression at the strength limit state.
0.875
= 44.56 in.
For #22 bars, d = 48 3
2
c=
A s fy
0.85 f' c 1 b
0.60 60
0.85 4 0.85 12
= 1.04 in.
The fraction of the section in compression is:

c
1.04
=
= 0.023 < 0.42
de
44.56
[5.7.3.3.2]
OK

The minimum reinforcement check has two parts.
The flexural
reinforcement needs to be able to carry a moment 20 percent larger than
the cracking moment of the cross section. If this criteria is not satisfied,
the amount of reinforcement needs to be increased to carry the lesser of
1.20 times the cracking moment or 1.33 times the original design
moment.
The rupture stress of concrete in flexure is:

[5.4.2.6]
fr = 0.24 f ' c = 0.24 4 = 0.48 ksi

The gross moment of inertia is:
1
1
4
b t3 =
12 (48)3 = 110,600 in
Ig =
12
12
The distance from the centroidal axis to the tension face is:
yt = 24.00 in
Combining these parameters leads to a cracking moment of:
fr Ig
0.48 110,600
Mcr =
=
= 184.3 kip - ft
yt
24.00 (12)
With a 20 percent increase, the required capacity is:
1.2 Mcr = 221.2 kip - ft
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-56
The capacity of the #22 bars at a 12 inch spacing is:

a
Mr = A s fy d
2
Mr = 0.9 0.60 60 44.56
1.04 0.85
2
1
= 119.1 kip - ft
12
Which is less than the 221.2 kip - ft capacity required.

The strength design moment of 91.2 kip-ft is less than half of the 1.2Mcr
moment. Provide reinforcement capable of resisting:
1.33 Mu = 1.33 91.2 = 121.8 kip - ft
The #22 bars at 12 inches, with a capacity of 119.1 kip ft, are within
3% of the required capacity. Consider the design adequate.
2. Bottom Transverse Reinforcement
Although the toe has a greater thickness than the heel, for simplicity
assume a constant thickness of 48 inches. Then the design moment for
the bottom mat is the largest of the moments due to the maximum pile
reactions for the Row I or Row III piles.
For the Row I piles:

Pile Reaction
(Moment Arm)
MuRowI =
Pile Spacing
202.6
=
(4.00 - 1.25) = 74.3 kip ft/ft width
7.5
For the Row III piles, subtract off the moment due to earth on the heel
when calculating the factored moment:
Pile Reaction
(Moment Arm) Mev
MuRowIII =
Pile Spacing
198.1
=
(6.50 - 1.25) 0.90 (55.8) = 68.6 kip ft/ft width
8.75
The Row I moment governs. Mudes = 74.3 kip - ft/ft width

Assuming #29 bars, the depth of the bottom flexural reinforcement is:
d
d = (thickness) (pile embedment) b
2
1.128
= 48 12
= 35.44 in.
2
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-57
Solve once again with:

As =
4.5 d 20.25 d2 13.236 Mu

6.618
2
The required area of steel is 0.47 in /ft. Try #22 bars at 12 inches with
2
standard hooks (As = 0.60 in /ft).
[5.7.3.3.2]
[5.7.3.3.2]

The minimum reinforcement check for the bottom of the footing has the
same steps as the other elements.

1
1
4
b t3 =
12 (48)3 = 110,600 in
Ig =
12
12
yt = 24.00 in
Combining these parameters and using the rupture stress computed
earlier leads to a cracking moment of:
fr Ig
0.48 110,600
Mcr =
=
= 184.3 ft - kip
yt
24.00 (12)
1.2 Mcr = 221.2 kip - ft
For #22 bars, d = 48 12
0.875
2
= 35.56 in

a
Mr = A s fy d
2
Mr = 0.9 0.60 60 35.56
1.04 1.85 1

2
12
NO GOOD
= 94.8 kip - ft < 221.2 kip - ft
Therefore, we must provide reinforcement capable of resisting:
1.33 Mu = 1.33 74.3
NO GOOD
= 98.4 kip - ft > 94.8 kip - ft by 4.2%
2
Revise reinforcement to #25 bars at 12 inches (As = 0.79 in /ft). Then

Mr = 124.1 kip - ft > = 98.8 kip - ft
OK
JANUARY 2004
[5.7.3.3.1]
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-58

1.00
For #25 bars, d = 48 12
= 35.50 in
2
c=
A s fy
0.85 f' c 1 b
0.79 60
0.85 4 0.85 12
= 1.37 in

c
1.37
=
= 0.039 < 0.42
de 35.50
OK
Provide #25 bars at 12 inches (As = 0.79 in /ft).

3. Longitudinal Reinforcement
For longitudinal bars, design for uniform load due to all vertical loads
spread equally over the length of the footing. Assume the footing acts as
a continuous beam over pile supports. Use the longest pile spacing for
design span.
Then based on the maximum vertical load from Table 11.4.1.5:

w =
u
4252
55.33
= 76.8 kips/ft
Mu =
wuL
10
76.8 (8.75)
= 588.0 kip - ft
10
Assume #19 bars, which is the smallest size used by Mn/DOT in footings:
d = 48 12 1.00
0.75
= 34.63 in
Solve for required area of reinforcement:
A s fy
Mr = Mn = A s fy d
'
2 0.85 fc
Then 588.0 = 0.90 A s 60 34.63
Mu
b
2 0.85 4 180 12
A s 60
Rearrange and get 0.2206 A s 155.84 A s + 588.0 = 0

2
Solving, minimum As = 3.79 in
Try 15-#19 bars at a 12 inch spacing. (As = 6.60 in )
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-59

By inspection, Mr > 1.33 Mu
OK

c=
A s fy
6.60 60
'
0.85 fc 1 b 0.85 4 0.85 180
c
0.76
=
= 0.0219 < 0.42
d 34.63
= 0.76 in
OK
2
Provide 15-#19 bars at 12 inches (As = 6.60 in ) for the footing

longitudinal reinforcement.
J. Flexural Design
of the Stem
The moments associated with the eccentricity of vertical loads are

minimal and are therefore ignored. Use a one-foot wide design strip.
The stem design is governed by the horizontal earth pressure and live
load surcharge loading during construction.
[3.11.5.5]
Horizontal Earth Pressure

ptop = 0.0 ksf
pbottom = 0.033 22.25 = 0.734 ksf
The resultant force applied to the stem is:

PEH = 0.5 (0.734) (22.25) (1.00) = 8.17 kips
The height of the resultant above the footing is:
x EH = 0.33 22.25 = 7.34 ft
The moment at the base of the stem is:
MEH = PEH x EH = 8.17 7.34 = 60.0 kp - ft
[Table 3.11.6.4-1]
Live Load Surcharge

For walls over 20 feet in height, heq is 2 feet.
The resultant force applied to the stem is:

PLS = 0.033 (2.00) (22.25) (1.00) = 1.47 kips
The height of the resultant force above the footing is:
22.25
xLS =
= 11.13 ft
2
The moment at the base of the stem is:
MLS = PLS X LS = 1.47 11.13 = 16.4 kip - ft
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-60
Design Moments
The design factored moment is:
Mu = 1.5 MEH + 1.75 MLS = 1.50 60.0 + 1.75 16.4 = 118.7 kip - ft
The design service moment is:
Mservice = 1.0 MEH + 1.0 MLS = 1.0 60.0 + 1.0 16.4 = 76.4 kip - ft
Horizontal
Load
xh
Figure 11.4.1.4 - Load Diagram for Stem Design

[5.7.2.2]
[5.7.3.2]
Investigate the Strength Limit State

Determine the area of back-face flexural reinforcement necessary to
satisfy the design moment.
MU = 118.7 kip - ft
Initially, assume that #19 bars are used for flexural reinforcement to
compute the d dimension:
db
0.75
= 51.63 in
= 54 2
2
2
d = (thickness ) (cover)
Using
As =
4.5 d 20.25 d2 13.236 Mu

6.618
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-61
2
The required area of steel is 0.51 in /ft.

2
(As=0.62 in /ft, d=51.69 in).
[5.7.3.4]
Try #16 bars at 6 inches
Crack Control
Check crack control equations to ensure that the primary reinforcement is
well distributed.
The transformed area of the reinforcement is:

2
n A s = 8 0.62 = 4.96 in
12
fc
N.A.
d = 51.69
nAs
ds - x
fs/n
Figure 11.4.1.5

1
2
bx = n As (d - x)
2
1
2
solving, x = 6.14 inches
( 12) x = 4.96 (51.69 - x)
2
6.14
x
jd = d
= 51.69
= 49.64 in
3
3
76.4 12
M
= 29.8 ksi
=
Actual fs =
As j d
0.62 (49.64)
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-62
For z = 170 kips/in, dc = 2.313 inches, #16 bars at 6 inches;

A=
2 (dc ) b 2 (2.313) 12
= 27.8 in2
=
N
2
z
170
=
Permitted f s = 3
3 2.313 27.8
dc A
= 42.4 > 0.6fy = 36 ksi
Actual f s = 29.8 ksi < Permitted fs = 36.0 ksi
[5.7.3.3.1]

2
compression at the strength limit state. With As = 0.62 in /ft and d =
51.69 inches, the depth of the section in compression is:
c=
A s fy
0.85 f' c 1 b
0.62 60
0.85 4 0.85 12
= 1.07 in

c
1.07
=
= 0.021 < 0.42
d 51.69
[5.7.3.3.2]
OK
OK

1
1
4
Ig =
b t3 =
12 (54)3 = 157,500 in
12
12
yt = 27.00 in
Combining these parameters and using the rupture stress computed
earlier leads to a cracking moment of:
fr I g
0.48 157,500
=
= 233.3 kip-ft
Mcr =
yt
27.00 (12)
1.2 Mcr = 280.0 kip - ft
a
Mr = A s fy d
2
Mr = 0.9 0.62 60 51.69
1.07 1.85 1
= 142.9 kip - ft
2
12
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-63
OK
142.9 kip - ft < 280.0 kip - ft
The strength design moment of 118.7 kip-ft is less than half of the
1.2Mcr moment. Provide reinforcement capable of resisting:
1.33 Mu = 1.33 118.7 = 157.9 kip - ft
2
With #19 bars (d = 51.63) the required area of steel is 0.69 in /ft.
2
Provide #19 bars at 6 inches (As = 0.88 in /ft) for vertical back face
reinforcement.
Shrinkage and Temperature Reinforcement
Mn/DOT practice for members over 48 inches thick is to use #19 bars
spaced at 12 inches.
2
Use #19 bars at 12 inches (As = 0.44 in /ft) on each face, for horizontal
reinforcement and #19 bars at 12 inches for vertical front face
reinforcement.
K. Splice Length
[5.11.5.3]
[5.11.2]
Calculate the tension lap length for the stem reinforcing. For epoxy
coated #19 bars the basic development length l db is the greater of:
1.25 A b fy 1.25 0.44 60
l db =
=
= 16.5 in.
f' c
4.0
or
l db
= 0.4 db fy = 0.4 0.75 60 = 18.0 in.
GOVERNS
The modification factors to the development length are:
1.5 for epoxy coated bars with cover less than three bar
diameters (2.25 in).
0.8 for bars with spacing 6 inches and cover 3 inches in

direction of spacing. (Note that cover for the end bars is < 3
inches, but the wall is long, so cover will have negligible effect.)
Then the development length l d is:
l d = 18.0 1.5 0.8 = 21.6 in.
Referring to LRFD Table 5.11.5.3.1-1, with 100 percent of the steel
spliced and less than twice the necessary amount of steel provided, a
Class C splice should be provided.
[5.11.5.3.1]
The required lap length
spl
is:
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
spl
11-64
= 1.70 l d = 1.70 21.6 = 36.7 in
Use a tension lap length of 37 inches.
L. Flexural Design
of the Backwall
(parapet)
The required vertical reinforcement in the backwall (parapet) is sized to

carry the moment at the bottom of the backwall.
The design is
performed on a one-foot wide strip of wall. The backwall design is
governed by the horizontal earth pressure and live load surcharge loading
during construction.
Horizontal Earth Pressure
ptop = 0.0 ksf
pbottom = 0.033 6.75 = 0.223 ksf
The resultant force applied to the backwall is:

PEH = 0.5 (0.223) (6.75) (1.00) = 0.75 kips
The height of the resultant above the bottom of the backwall is:
x EH = 0.33 (6.75) = 2.25 ft
The moment at the bottom of the backwall is:
MEH = PEH x EH = 0.75 2.25 = 1.69 kip - ft
[Table 3.11.6.4-1]
Live Load Surcharge

Interpolate between the values provided in the table to arrive at the
required equivalent height of surcharge to use for the design of the
backwall.
6.75 5
(3 4) + 4 = 3.65 ft
10.0 5
heq =
The resultant force applied to the backwall is:

PLS = 0.033 (3.65) (6.75) (1.00) = 0.81 kips
The height of the resultant force above the bottom of the backwall is:
6.75
x LS =
= 3.38 ft
2
Moment at the bottom of the backwall is:
MLS = PLS x LS = 0.81 3.38 = 2.74 kip - ft
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-65
Horizontal
Load
x
M
Figure 11.4.1.6 - Load Diagram for Backwall Design

Design Moments
Combining the load factors for the EH and LS load components with the
flexural design forces at the bottom of the backwall produces the
following design forces.
MU = 1.5MEH + 1.75MLS = 1.5(1.69) + 1.75(2.74) = 7.33 kip - ft
MSERVICE = MEH + MLS = 1.69 + 2.74 = 4.43 kip - ft
[5.7.2.2]
[5.7.3.2]
Investigate the Strength Limit State

satisfy the design moment.
Once again, use

As =
4.5 d 20.25 d2 13.236 Mu

6.618
Initially, assume that #19 bars are used for flexural reinforcement to
compute the d dimension:
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-66
d
0.75
d = (thickness ) (clear cover ) b = 18 2
= 15.63 in
2
2
2
Solving the equation, the required area of steel is 0.10 in /ft.

In no case should reinforcement be less than #16 bars at a 12 inch
2
spacing. The area of steel for #16 bars at 12 inches is 0.31 in /ft.
Continue the backwall flexural checks using #16 bars at 12 inches. The
actual d for this reinforcement layout is:
0.625
d = 18 2
= 15.69 in.
2
[5.7.3.4]
Check Crack Control

Check crack control equations to ensure that the primary reinforcement is
well distributed. Design for a z value of 170 kip/in.
To check if steel stresses are acceptable, determine the cracked section

properties with the trial reinforcement.
Compute the modular ratio for 4.0 ksi concrete:
E
29,000
n= s =
= 7.96
1.5
Ec
33,000 (0.145) 4
The transformed area of the reinforcement is:
2
n As = 8 0.31 = 2.48 in
1
2
bx = n As (ds - x)
2
1
2
= 2.48 (15.69 - x)
( 12) x
jd = d
2.35
x
= 15.69
= 14.91 in
3
3
Actual fs =
4.43 12
M
= 11.5 ksi
=
As j d
0.31 (14.91)
For z = 170 kips/in, dc = 2.31 inches, #16 bars at 12 inches;

2 (dc ) b 2 (2.31) 12
= 55.4 in2
A=
=
N
1
Use 8
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN

z
170
Permitted f s =
=
3 2.31 55.4
3d A
c
11-67
= 33.7 ksi < 0.6fy = 36.0 ksi
Actual f s = 11.5 ksi < Permitted fs = 33.7 ksi

[5.7.3.3.1]

2
compression at the strength limit state. With As = 0.31 in /ft and d =
15.69 inches, the depth of the section in compression is:
A s fy
0.31 60
c=
=
= 0.54 in.
0.85 f'c 1 b 0.85 4 0.85 12

c
0.54
=
= 0.034 < 0.42
d 15.69
[5.7.3.3.2]
OK
OK

1
1
4
b t3 =
12 (18)3 = 5,832 in
Ig =
12
12
yt = 9.00 in
Combining these parameters leads to a cracking moment of:
fr I g
0.48 5,832
=
= 25.9 kip-ft
Mcr =
yt
9.00 (12)
And with the 20 percent increase, the required capacity is:
1.2 Mcr = 31.1 kip-ft
Mr = A s fy d
Mr = 0.9 0.31 60 15.69
0.54 0.85 1
= 21.6 < 31.1 kip - ft
2
12
2
The required steel area due to flexure is 0.10 in /ft. The minimum steel
2
permitted (#16 bars at 12 inches) has an area of 0.31 in /ft.
Consequently, the minimum steel provides more than 1.33 of the
required steel.
Use #16 bars at 12 inches for vertical back face reinforcement.
JANUARY 2004
[5.10.8]
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-68
Shrinkage and Temperature Reinforcement

To distribute and limit the size of cracks associated with concrete
shrinkage and with temperature changes, a modest amount of
reinforcement is provided transverse to the primary reinforcement.
The total area of required transverse reinforcement to be distributed to

both faces is:
Ag
= 0.11 18 12 = 0.40 in2/ft
f
60
y
A s 0.11
Provide horizontal #16 bars at 12 inches to both faces, As = 0.31 in /ft
The final reinforcing layout, is presented in Figure 11.4.1.7.
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 11.4.1.7
11-69
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
[ This page intentionally left blank ]
11-70
JANUARY 2004
11.4.2 Retaining
Wall Design
Example
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-71
This design example illustrates the design of a cantilever retaining wall

supported on a spread footing. The wall supports 13-0 of fill, an F
rail, and has no counterforts. After assembling the load components and
design loads, the global behavior of the retaining wall is evaluated. This
includes: an eccentricity or overturning check, a bearing stress check,
and a sliding check, after which, the wall section is designed. The design
example concludes with shear and flexural checks of the footing.
A preliminary cross-section of the wall is shown in Figure 11.4.2.1.
Choose a footing width between 70 and 75 percent of the stem height
and a footing thickness between 10 and 15 percent of the stem height.
Choose a toe projection equal to approximately 30 percent of the footing
width.
Figure 11.4.2.1
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-72
Material and design parameters used in this example are:

Soil:
The soil is noncohesive.
Unit Weight of fill, ws = 0.120 kcf
Ultimate Soil Capacity, qn = 4.5 tsf
Internal friction angle of foundation soil, f = 30
Concrete:
Strength at 28 Days, fc = 4.0 ksi
Unit Weight, wc = 0.150 kcf
Reinforcement:
Yield Strength, fy = 60 ksi
Modulus of Elasticity, Es = 29,000 ksi
Barrier (F rail) Weight = 0.439 k/ft
A. Bearing
Resistance
[10.6.3.1]
[Table 10.5.5-1]
The qn values are provided to designers in the foundation

recommendation report. The report is based on standard penetration
test (SPT) data.
= 0.45 for soil resistance
qr = qn = 0.45 (4.5) = 2.03 tsf
B. Permanent
Loads (DC and EV)
[3.5.1]
The design of the retaining wall is performed on a strip 1-0 wide.

Figure 11.4.2.2 shows a section of the retaining wall. Soil and concrete
elements are broken into rectangles or triangles. Each rectangle or
triangle is labeled with two numbers. The first number is the unfactored
weight of the region and the second number (the number in parenthesis)
is the horizontal distance x from the toe of the footing to the center of
the region.
C. Earth Pressure
(EH)
[3.11.5]
For level fill applications, the equivalent-fluid method of LRFD Section

3.11.5.5 can be used to determine the magnitude of active earth
pressure. For dense sand backfills equivalent fluids with a unit weight
between 0.030 and 0.035 kcf are appropriate. Mn/DOT practice is to use
0.033 kcf.
eq = 0.033 kcf
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-73
For a 1 foot wide design strip, the horizontal earth pressure is:
PEHtop = (0.033) (0) (1) = 0 kips/ft
PEHbottom = (0.033) (14.50) (1) = 0.479 kips/ft
PEH =
1
(0.479) (14.50) = 3.47 kips
2
The earth pressure resultant is applied at:

yEH = S / 3 = (14.50) / 3 = 4.83 ft above bottom of footing
See Figure 11.3.2.2 for application of the earth pressure load.
D. Live Load
Surcharge (LS)
[3.11.6.4]
The horizontal pressure pLS due to live load surchange is:

p LS
= eq heq
From Table 3.11.6.4-2, use heq = 2.0 ft based on a distance from wall
backface to edge of traffic 1 ft.
pLS = (0.033) (2.0) = 0.066 ksf
Horizontal Component of LS:

PLS = (0.066) (14.50) = 0.96 kips
The live load surcharge resultant is applied at:
y LS =
S
2
14.50
2
= 7.25 ft above bottom of footing
See Figure 11.4.2.2 for application of the live load surcharge.
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-74
Figure 11.4.2.2
E. Barrier Loading
(CT)
[A13.2]
The vehicle collision load and Extreme Event II limit state will be
considered only when checking overturning, bearing, and sliding of the
wall. A yield line analysis shows that the F-rail reinforcement is adequate
to resist the vehicle collision load. (See F-Rail Design Example in Section
13.3.1 of this manual.) The retaining wall reinforcement will be the same
or greater than the F-rail reinforcement. Therefore, by inspection, it will
also be adequate to resist the collision load.
From Section 13.3.1E, the length of the end region Lce for barrier load
distribution is:
Lce = 5.0 ft (for F-rail)
Assume that the load distributes within the wall with a 45 slope and that
one end of the retaining wall is vertical (next to the end of the wall or
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-75
adjacent to a vertical joint in the wall.) The elevation view presented in

Figure 11.4.2.3 shows the assumed effective length of the retaining wall.
Figure 11.4.2.3
The horizontal vehicle collision force applied to the barrier is 54 kips.

@ bottom of footing, PCT =
54
5.0 + 2.67 + 13 + 1.50
= 2.44 kip/ft width
PCT is applied at a height:

yCT = 2.67 = 13.0 = 1.50 = 17.17 ft above bottom of footing
Per LRFD Article 13.6.2, this loading is already factored and is to be
considered at the extreme event limit state.
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-76
F. Select Load
Modifiers
[1.3.3-1.3.5]
For typical retaining walls use:

D = 1 , R = 1 , I = 1
G. Select
Applicable Load
Combinations and
Factors
[3.4.1]
Table 11.4.2.1 summarizes the load combinations used for design of the
wall. Strength Ia and Extreme Event IIa, both used to check sliding and
overturning, have minimum load factors for the vertical loads and
maximum load factors for the horizontal loads. Strength Ib and Extreme
Event IIb are used to check bearing and have maximum load factors for
both vertical and horizontal loads. Note that live load surcharge (LS) and
horizontal earth (EH) are not included in Extreme Event IIa or IIb. The
vehicle collision load (CT) is an instantaneous load applied in the same
direction as LS and EH. Because of its instantaneous nature, it has the
effect of unloading LS and EH. Therefore, the three loads are not
additive and only CT is included in the Extreme Event load combinations.
The service limit state is used for the crack control check.
Table 11.4.2.1 - Load Combinations Considered for Example
H. Tabulate Loads
and Moments For
Footing Design
Load Comb.
DC
EV
LS
Strength Ia
0.90
1.00
1.75
EH
1.50
CT
-
Application
Sliding,
Overturning
Bearing, Wall
Strength Ib
1.25
1.35
1.75
1.50
Extreme IIa
0.90
1.00
1.00
Extreme IIb
1.25
1.35
1.00
Bearing
Service I
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Wall Crack Control
Strength
Sliding,
Overturning
The vertical loads and lever arms to the toe of the footing for the earth
and concrete dead loads in Figure 11.4.2.2 are summarized in Table
11.4.2.2. Also presented are the corresponding moments about the toe.
Ps pertains to the stem and barrier. Pf pertains to the footing, and EV
summarizes the vertical earth loads on both the toe and heel.
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-77
Table 11.4.2.2
Unfactored Vertical Loads and Moments about Toe
Moment Arm
Vertical Load
About Toe x
Moment About Toe
(kips)
(ft)
(kip-ft)
Ps1 (barrier)
0.44
3.32
1.46
Ps2 (rectangle)
2.93
3.50
10.26
Ps3 (triangle)
0.53
4.43
2.35
Ps (resultant)
3.90
3.61
14.07
Pf1 (1-7/2 thick)
074
1.52
1.12
Pf2 (1-6 thick)
1.40
6.15
8.61
Pf (resultant)
2.14
4.55
9.73
EV1 (toe)
0.95
1.38
1.31
EV2(rectangle)
6.96
7.02
48.86
EV3 (triangle)
0.42
4.61
1.94
EV (resultant)
8.33
6.26
52.11
Table 11.4.2.3 contains similar data for the horizontal loads presented in
Figures 11.4.2.2 and 11.4.2.3.
Table 11.4.2.3
Unfactored Horizontal Loads and Overturning Moments
Moment Arm To
Horizontal Load
Bottom of Footing
Moment
(kip)
(kip-ft)
(feet)
PEH
3.47
4.83
16.76
PLS
0.96
7.25
6.96
PCT
2.44
17.17
41.89
Calculate loads and moments acting on the retaining wall for the different
load combinations. An example calculation for the Strength Ia load
combination is shown below. Results for other load combinations are
shown in Table 11.4.2.4.
Strength Ia: D R I (0.90 DC + 1.0 EV + 1.75 LS +1.50 EH)
V = 1.0 [0.90 (3.90+2.14)+1.0 (8.33)]
= 13.77 kips
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-78
MV =1.0 [0.90(14.07 + 9.73) = 1.0(52.11)]

= 73.53 kip-ft
H = 1.0 (1.75 0.96 + 1.50 3.47) = 6.89 kips
MH = 1.0 (1.75 6.96 + 1.50 16.76) = 37.32 kip ft
Table 11.4.2.4 - Factored Loads and Moments
Vertical Load
Moment
Horizontal
Moment
MV
Load H
MH
(kips)
(kip-ft)
(kips)
(kip-ft)
Load Combination
I. Check
Overturning
[11.6.3.3]
[10.6.3.1.5]
Strength Ia
13.77
73.53
6.89
37.32
Strength Ib
18.80
100.10
6.89
37.32
Extreme Ev. IIa
13.77
73.53
2.44
41.89
Extreme Ev. IIb
18.80
100.10
2.44
41.89
Service I
14.37
75.91
4.43
23.72
The width of footing dimension is designated as d in the Bridge

Standard Plans for retaining walls. The LRFD Specifications designate the
width of the footing as B. For this example, the foundation rests on soil.
emax =
d
9.25
B
=
=
= 2.31 ft
4
4
4
Using the following relationships, compare the actual eccentricity e to

emax:
xr =
Mv Mh
,
V
Actual e =
- xr
2
where xr = location of resultant from the toe
For Strength Ia:
73.53 37.32
= 2.63 ft
xr =
13.77
Actual e =
9.25
2
2.63 = 2.00 ft < 2.31 ft
OK
For Extreme Event IIa:

xr =
73.53 41.89
Actual e =
13.77
9.25
2
= 2.30 ft
2.30 = 2.33 ft > 2.31 ft by 0.87%
SAY OK
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-79
The footing size is satisfactory for overturning.

J. Check Bearing
[11.6.3.2]
Determine if the bearing resistance (qr = 2.03 tsf) is adequate for the
calculated bearing pressure V .
V
V =
(d 2e)
where V = summation of vertical forces per unit length of wall

For Strength Ib:
M v Mh
xr =
e=
d
2
V =
xr =
100.10 37.32
9.25
2
18.80
= 3.34 ft
3.34 = 1.29 ft
1 = 1.41 tsf < 2.03 tsf
9.25 - 2 (1.29) 2
18.80
OK
For Extreme Event IIb:

100.10 41.89
xr =
e=
18.80
9.25
2
V =
= 3.10 ft
3.10 = 1.53 ft
1 = 1.52 tsf < 2.03 tsf
9.25 - 2 (1.53) 2
18.80
OK
The footing size is satisfactory for bearing.
K. Check Sliding
[10.6.3.3]
[Table 3.11.5.3.1]
The factored horizontal force is checked against the friction resistance

between the footing and the soil. If adequate resistance is not provided
by the footing, a shear key must be added.
QR = Qn = QT + EP QEP
From LRFD Table 10.5.5-1, T = 0.80
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN

QT = V tan
[10.6.3.3]
11-80
(for cohesionless soils)
with tan = tan f
(for CIP footing)
For Strength Ia:

QT = 13.77 (tan 30 ) = 7.95 kips
Qep = 0.0 (No shear key)
QR = 0.80 (7.95) + (0.0) = 6.36kips < 6.89 kips
NO GOOD
A shear key must be added.

Similar to the retaining wall details in the Bridge Standard Plans, use a 1
foot by 1 foot shear key placed such that the back wall reinforcement will
extend into the shear key. Consider only the passive resistance of soil in
front of the shear key. Ignore the passive resistance of soil in front of
the wall and toe. Refer to Figure 11.4.2.4.
Passive Resistance Due to Shear Key

Figure 11.4.2.4
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-81
For horizontal fill and a shear key with a vertical face,

2
k p = tan

30
45 + f = tan2 45 + = 3.0
2
2
Then:
p ep1 = k p w s y1 = 3.0 0.120 4.50 = 1.62 ksf
p ep2 = k p w s y 2 = 3.0 0.120 5.50 = 1.98 ksf
p ep2 + p ep1
(y 2 y1 )
QEP =
1.98 + 1.62
(5.50 4.50)
2
= 1.80 k
Referring again to LRFD Table 10.5.5-1:
T = 1.00 (Soil on soil to be used only in area in front of shear key)
ep = 0.50
For Strength Ia with shear key added:
4.25
5.00
7.95 + 0.80
7.95 + 0.50 1.80
9.25
9.25
QR = 1.00
= 7.99 kips > 6.89 kips
OK
By inspection, sliding resistance is adequate for Extreme Event IIa.

L. Design Footing
for Shear
[5.13.3.6]
Design footings to have adequate shear capacity without transverse

reinforcement.
Determine dv
2
As a starting point, assume #22 bars @ 12 (As = 0.60 in /ft) for the top
2
transverse bars in the heel and #16 bars @ 12 (As = 0.31 in /ft) for the
bottom transverse bars in the toe. Cover is 3 inches for the top
reinforcement and 5 inches for the bottom reinforcement.
Then for the heel:

0.875
= 14.56 in
dsheel = 18-32
aheel =
A s fy
'
0.85 fc
0.60 60
0.85 4 12
= 0.88 in
JANUARY 2004
[5.8.2.9]
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
dvheel = dsheel
= 14.56
0.88
2
11-82
GOVERNS
= 14.12 in
or dvheel = 0.9 de = 0.9 dsheel = 0.90 14.56 = 13.10 in

or dvheel = 0.72 h = 0.72 18.00 = 12.96 in
For the toe:
dstoe = 19.5 5
atoe =
0.625
2
0.31 60
0.85 4 12
dvtoe = 14.19
= 14.19 in
= 0.46 in
0.46
2
= 13.96 in
or dvtoe = 0.9 14.19 = 12.77 in

or dvtoe = 0.72 19.50 = 14.04 in
GOVERNS
Check Heel for Shear

The critical shear section for the heel of the footing is located at the back
face of the wall. The heel of the footing is assumed to carry its selfweight
and the rectangular soil block above it. This neglects the benefit of any
upward soil pressure below the footing.
Vu = ( EV w h + DC w c)(d b a)
s
Vu = 1.35 0.120 13 + 1.25 0.150 1.50) (9.25 2.75 2.04)

=
[5.8.3.3]
[5.8.3.4]
[5.8.2.9]
10.65 kips
Using = 2.0 and assuming #22 bars in the top mat:

'
Vc = 0.0316 f b v d v
c
Vc = 0.90 0.0316 2 4 12 14.12
= 19.28 k > 10.65 k
OK
Check Toe for Shear

The peak factored bearing stress is 1.52 tsf for the Extreme Event IIb
load case. The critical section for the toe of the footing is at dv from the
front face of the wall. For a quick simplified check, try applying the peak
bearing stress over the entire length of the toe (dimension b = 2-9).
Vu = v b = 1.52 2.75 2 = 8.36 k/ft
JANUARY 2004
M. Design Footing
Reinforcement
[5.13.3.4]
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-83
By inspection the toe has adequate shear capacity.

Each mat of reinforcement is checked to ensure that it has adequate
capacity and that maximum and minimum reinforcement checks are
satisfied.
The critical section for flexure in the footing is at the face of the wall.
Top Transverse Reinforcement
From the shear check of the heel, Vu = 10.65 kips.
Then:
Mu = Vu (moment arm)
9.25 2.75 2.04

= 23.75 kip ft
2
= 10.65
Set up the equation to solve for required steel area:

a
Mu = Mn = A s fy ds
2
= A s fy ds
A s fy
'
1.7 fc b
Mu = 0.90 A s 60 ds
1

1.7 4 12 12
A s 60
3.309 A s 4.5 ds A s + Mu = 0
For 3 clear cover and #22 bars, ds = 14.56 in
Substituting and solving for As, we get:
2
Required As = 0.37 in /ft
Try #19 bars @ 12,
[5.7.3.3.2]
As = 0.44 in /ft

Determine the cracking moment:
fr = 0.24 f 'c = 0.24 4 = 0.48 ksi

Ig =
yt =
1
12
1
2
bc
c =
1
2
1
12
12 (18)
18 = 9 in
= 5832 in
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN

Mcr =
11-84
fr I g
0.48 5832
=
= 25.9 kip-ft
yt
9 (12)
The capacity of the section must be the smaller of:

1.2 Mcr = 31.1 kip-ft
GOVERNS
4
4
Mu = 23.75 = 31.7 kip ft
or
3
3
The capacity of the top mat of reinforcement is:
Mr = As fy (ds a/2)
For #19 bars, ds = 14.63 in
Mr = 0.9 (0.44) (60) 14.63
2 (0.85) (4) (12) 12

0.44 (60)
Mr = 28.3 kip-ft < 31.1 kip-ft
NO GOOD
2
Revise reinforcement to #22 bars @12, As = 0.60 in /ft

Mr = 38.1 kip-ft > 31.1 kip-ft
[5.7.3.3.1]
OK

c=
c
de
A s fy
0.60 (60)
=
= 1.04 in
0.85 f'c 1 b
0.85 (4) (0.85) (12)
=
c
ds
1.04
14.56
= 0.071 < 0.42
OK
Use #22 bars @12 (As = 0.60 in /ft) for top transverse reinforcement in
the footing
Bottom Transverse Reinforcement
From shear check for the toe, Vu = 8.36 kips
2.75
= 11.50 kip-ft
2
Mu = Vu (moment arm) = 8.36
For 5 clear cover and #16 bars, ds = 14.19 in

2
Again use: 3.309 A s 4.5 ds A s + Mu = 0
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-85
Substituting and solving for As, we get:

2
Required As = 0.18 in /ft

2
Try #16 bars @12, As = 0.31 in /ft

[5.7.3.3.1]

Compute the compression block depth:
A s fy
0.31 (60)
=
= 0.54 in
0.85 f'c 1 b
0.85 (4) (0.85) (12)
c=
c
de
[5.7.3.3.2]
c
ds
0.54
14.19
= 0.038 < 0.42
OK

1
1
4
3
3
Ig =
bc =
12 (19.50) = 7415 in
12
12
yt =
1
2
Mcr =
c =
1
2
19.50 = 9.75 in
fr I g
0.48 7415
=
= 30.4 kip-ft
yt
9.75 (12)

1.2 Mcr = 1.230.4 = 36.5 kip-ft
or
4
3
Mu =
4
3
GOVERNS
11.50 = 15.3 kip ft
Compute the capacity of the provided steel:

Mr = As fy (ds a/2)
Mr = 0.9 (0.31) (60) 14.19
0.31 (60 )
1

2 (0.85) (4 ) (12 ) 12
Mr = 19.48 ft-kips > 15.3 kip-ft
OK
2
Use #16 bars @ 12 (As = 0.31 in /ft) for bottom transverse

reinforcement in the footing.
JANUARY 2004
[5.10.8]
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-86
Longitudinal Reinforcement
Provide longitudinal reinforcement in the footing based on shrinkage and
temperature requirements.
For footings, shrinkage reinforcement need not exceed 0.0015Ag

2
A s = 0.0015 (19.50) (12) = 0.35 in /ft
total in each direction
Half is required in each face,
1
2
(0.35) = 0.18 in /ft
Min As =
2
2
Use #16 bars @ 12" (As = 0.31 in /ft) for top and bottom longitudinal
reinforcement in the footing.
N. Determine
Loads For Wall
Stem Design
The loads on the stem at the top of the footing can now be determined to
arrive at the design forces for the wall.
Earth Pressure:
PEHtop = 0 kips/ft
PEHbottom = 0.033 (13.0) (1) = 0.429 kips/ft
1
PEH = (0.429) (13.0) = 2.79 kips
2
yEH =
13
= 4.33 ft
3
MEH = PEH y LS = 2.79 4.33 = 12.08 kip ft
Live Load Surcharge:

PLS = (0.066) (13) = 0.86 kips
13
= 6.50 ft
2
M = P y LS = 0.86 6.50 = 5.59 kip ft
LS
LS
yLS =
Using the Strength I load combination, the factored design forces for the
wall stem are:
Hu = 1.50 PEH + 1.75 PLS
= 1.50 2.79 + 1.75 0.86
= 5.69 kips
Mu = 1.50 MEH + 1.75 MLS
= 1.50 12.08 + 1.75 5.59
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-87
= 27.90 kip-ft
The service design forces for the wall stem are:
Hserv = 1.00 PEH + 1.00 PLS
= 1.00 2.79 + 1.00 0.86
= 3.65 kips
Mserv = 1.00 MEH + 1.00 MLS
= 1.00 12.08 + 1.00 5.59
= 17.67 kip-ft
O. Wall Stem
Design
Investigate Shear
Shear typically does not govern the design of retaining walls. If shear
does become an issue, the thickness of the stem should be increased
such that transverse reinforcement is not required.
Ignoring the benefits of the shear key and axial compression, the shear
capacity of the stem can be shown to be greater than that required.
[5.8.3.3-1]
Vn = Vc + Vs + Vp
Recognizing that Vs and Vp are zero

Vn = Vc
[5.8.3.3-3]
Vc = 0.0316 f' c b v d v
Use dv = 0.90 d and assume #25 bars

s
Then dv = 0.90 (24.50 2.00 0.50) = 19.80 in

Using = 0.62 (smallest value in LRFD Table 5.8.3.4.2-2)
Vc = 0.0316 0.62 4 12 19.8 = 9.31 kips
Vc = 0.90 9.31 = 8.38 > 5.69 kips
P. Wall Stem
Design
Investigate
Strength Limit
State
OK

satisfy the design moment:
MU = 27.90 kip-ft
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-88
Again use the equation:

2
3.309 As 4.5 dsAs + MU = 0

For 2 inch clear cover and #25 bars, ds = 22.00 in
Substitute and solve for As:

Required As = 0.28 in2/ft
Try #16 bars @12 (As = 0.31 in2/ft.)
Q. Wall Design
Investigate
Service Limit State
[5.7.3.4]
Check the crack control equations to ensure that the primary flexural
reinforcement is well distributed. Design for a z value of 170 kip/in. The
service load bending moment is 17.67 kip-ft.
For #16 bars @ 12, As = 0.31 in2/ft:
ds = 24.50 2.00
dc = 2.00 +
A=
0.625
2
2 (dc ) b
N
0.625
2
= 22.19 in
= 2.31 in
2 (2.31) 12
1
= 55.44 in2
The allowable stress, fsa is:

fsa =
z
3d
c A
170
3
2.31 55.44
= 33.7 ksi
or fsa = 0.6 fy = 0.6 60 = 36.0 ksi

[5.4.2.4]
[5.7.1]
The transformed area of reinforcement is:

2
n As = 8(0.31) = 2.48 in
GOVERNS
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-89
Determine location of the neutral axis:

12
fc
N.A.
ds = 22.19
ds - x
nAs
fs/n
Figure 11.4.2.5
1
2
1
2
bx
= n As (ds - x)
( 12) x
= 2.48 (22.19 - x)
Then:
jds = ds
2.83
x
= 22.19
= 21.25 in
3
3
Actual fs =
17.67 12
M
=
A s j ds
0.31 (21.25)
= 32.2 ksi < 33.7 ksi
R. Check
Reinforcement
Limits
[5.7.3.3.2]
[5.4.2.6]
OK

Minimum reinforcement is required to ensure that ductile behavior occurs
at ultimate load. The flexural reinforcement needs to be able to carry the
lesser of 1.20 times the cracking moment or 1.33 times the original
design moment.
fr = 0.24 f ' c = 0.24 4 = 0.48 ksi

Ig =
1
12
ba
1
12
12 (24.5)
= 14,706 in
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN

yt =
1
2
Mcr =
a =
1
2
fr I g
yt
11-90
24.50 = 12.25 in
0.48 14,706
= 48.0 kip-ft
12.25 (12)

1.2 Mcr = 57.6 kip-ft
or
4
3
Mu =
4
3
GOVERNS
27.90 = 37.2 kip ft
Mr = As fy (ds a/2) / 12
Mr = 0.9 (0.31) (60) 22.19
2 (0.85) (4) (12) 12

0.31 (60)
Mr = 30.6 kip-ft < 37.2 kip-ft
NO GOOD
2
Revise reinforcement to #19 bars @ 12, As = 0.44 in /ft

ds = 22.13 in
Mr = 43.2 kip-ft > 37.2 kip-ft
OK

To reduce the likelihood of a brittle failure mode a limit is placed on the
maximum flexural reinforcement allowed in the cross section.
[5.7.3.3.1]
c=
A s fy
0.44 (60)
=
= 0.76 in
0.85 f'c 1 b
0.85 (4) (0.85) (12)
de = ds = 22.13 inches
c
de
0.76
22.13
= 0.034 < 0.42
OK
2
Use #19 bars @ 12 (As = 0.44 in /ft) for stem wall back face vertical
bars.
S. Design Stem
Wall Shrinkage
and Temperature
Reinforcement
[5.10.8]
To ensure good performance, a minimum amount of reinforcement needs

to be placed near each face of concrete elements. This reinforcement
limits the size of cracks associated with concrete shrinkage and
temperature changes.
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-91
Ag
24.5 (12)
2
Min. Total Temp. A s 0.11
= 0.11
= 0.54 in /ft
f
60
For walls, temperature As need not exceed 0.0015 Ag:

2
Min. Total Temp. As 0.0015(24.5)(12)= 0.44 in /ft
GOVERNS
This is the total area in each direction. It is distributed to both faces of

the element.
Based on half placed in each face, the required steel for each face is:
1
2
(0.44) = 0.22 in /ft each direction
Required Temp. As =
2
2
Use #16 @ 12" (As = 0.31 in /ft) for stem wall front face bars and back
face horizontal bars.
T. Summary
The wall section shown in Figure 11.4.2.6 summarizes the design of the
retaining wall. Note that the spacing of the longitudinal footing bars is
revised slightly from previous calculations for detailing purposes.
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 11.4.2.6
11-92
JANUARY 2004
11.4.3 ThreeColumn Pier
Design Example
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-93
This example illustrates the design of a reinforced concrete three-column

pier. The pier supports a prestressed beam superstructure. The design of
the beams is presented in Section 5.7.2. The bearings are designed in
Section 14.8.1. The superstructure has two equal spans of 130 feet and
is part of a grade-separation structure. The superstructure is considered
translationally fixed at the pier. An end view of the pier is presented in
Figure 11.4.3.1. Two sets of bearings rest on the pier cap, one set for
the beams of each span. To simplify design, only one reaction is used
per beam line, acting at the centerline of pier.
3-Column Pier End View

Figure 11.4.3.1
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-94
The pier cap is supported by three columns. The columns are supported
by separate pile foundations. An elevation view of the pier is presented
in Figure 11.4.3.2.
3-Column Pier - Elevation

Figure 11.4.3.2
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-95
Pier design is accomplished with a top down approach. The design

parameters and loads are determined first - followed by the pier cap,
column, and footing designs.
The following terms are used to describe the orientation of the structural
components and loads. The terms longitudinal and transverse are
used to describe global orientation relative to the superstructure and
roadway. The terms parallel and perpendicular are used to define the
orientations relative to the pier. The parallel dimension is the long
direction of the structural component and the perpendicular dimension is
90 to the parallel dimension and is in the direction of the short side.
The distinction becomes clear in describing the load path for lateral forces
applied to bridges with substructures skewed to the superstructure.
Forces parallel and perpendicular to the pier arise from combining the
component forces applied transversely and longitudinally to the
superstructure. The pier for this example is not skewed, consequently
transverse forces are equivalent to parallel pier forces. However, to
ensure the clarity of future designs, the parallel and perpendicular
nomenclature will be used.
A. Material and
Design Parameters
Pier Cap
The cap must have sufficient length to support all of the beam lines and
their bearings. It also must have sufficient width to support two lines of
bearings and provide adequate edge distances for the bearings.
Pedestals are constructed on the pier cap to accommodate the different
heights at which the prestressed beams are supported due to the cross
slope of the deck. When beginning a design, first determine the required
width and then try a cap depth equal to 1.4 to 1.5 times the width.
Table 11.4.3.1 Pier Cap Parameters
Parameter
Label
Value
Width of Pier Cap
bcap
40 in
Length of Pier Cap
Lcap
51 ft = 612 in
Depth of Pier Cap at Center
dmid
56 in
Depth of Pier Cap at Ends
dend
36 in
Columns
In order to avoid interference between the column vertical bars and pier
cap reinforcement, choose columns with a diameter slightly smaller than
the width of the pier cap. Columns should also be proportioned relative
to the depth of the superstructure. For 72 prestressed beams a column
diameter of at least 36 inches should be used. (See Section 11.1.2.)
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-96
Table 11.4.3.2 Column Parameters

Parameter
Label
Value
Column Diameter
dcol
36 in
Number of Columns
Ncol
Column Cross-Sectional Area
Column Moment of Inertia
36
Ag
2
2
= 1018 in
36
Ig
64
82,450 in
Footing and Piles

A rectangular footing with the following properties will be tried initially:
Table 11.4.3.3 Foundation Parameters
Parameter
Label
Value
Pile Type
Cast-In-Place
Pile Diameter
dpile
12 in
Depth of Footing
dfoot
3.75 ft
Width of Footing Parallel to Pier
bfoot
9.0 ft
Length of Footing Perpendicular to Pier
Lfoot
12.0 ft
The Bridge Construction Units Foundation Recommendations must be

referenced at the beginning of final design.
The recommendations
identify the pile design capacity Qn and resistance factor to be used:
Nominal Capacity Qn = 180 tons/pile
Resistance Factor = 0.45
Bearing Resistance Qr = Qn = 0.45 180 = 81 tons/pile = 162 kips/pile
Location of Columns
The outside columns should be positioned to minimize dead load
moments in the columns and also balance the negative moments in the
pier cap over the columns. A rule of thumb is to use an overhang
dimension (measured from edge of outside column to centerline of
1
exterior beam) equal to /5 of the column spacing. After trying several
layouts, outside columns located 18.75 feet from the center of the bridge
were found to minimize design forces.
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-97
The following material weights and strengths are used in this example:
Table 11.4.3.4 Unit Weights and Strengths
B. Determine
Design Loads
Parameter
Label
Unit Weight of Concrete
Concrete Compressive Strength
fc
Value
0.145 kcf (strength)

0.150 kcf (loads)
4 ksi
33,000 0.145
1.5
Modulus of Elasticity, Concrete
Ec
Yield Strength of Reinforcement
fy
60 ksi
Modulus of Elasticity, Reinforcement
Es
29,000 ksi
= 3644 ksi
Modular Ratio
Soil Unit Weight
soil
0.120 kcf
The loads applied to the three-column pier include dead load, live load,
braking force, wind on structure, wind on live load, and uniform
temperature change. The pier is assumed to be protected by one of the
means identified in LRFD Article 3.6.5.1. Vehicular collision forces will
not be considered.
Application of Loads to the Structural Model
Aside from wind on substructure and internal temperature change forces,
the loads applied to the pier are transferred from the superstructure to
the pier cap via the bearings. Figure 11.4.3.3 illustrates the load
components that are transferred from the bearings to the pier cap. At
each girder location three load components are possible, a parallel force,
a perpendicular force, and a vertical force. In the following load tables,
vertical force components are identified as V1 to V6. Parallel forces have
labels of LPar1 to LPar6, and perpendicular forces are identified as LPerp1 to
LPerp6.
For several loads applied to the pier, the concrete deck was assumed to
be a rigid diaphragm. A rigid deck assumption combined with the
presence of diaphragms at the pier permits one to assume that the
parallel and perpendicular wind loads can be evenly distributed among
the bearings. Varying vertical reactions resist lateral and vertical loads
that produce an overturning moment.
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-98
Loads Applied to the Pier

Figure 11.4.3.3
The superstructure dead loads applied to the pier consist of the following:
the design shear in the prestressed beam at the centerline of bearing, the
beam ends (portion of the beams beyond centerline of bearing), the
portion of deck, stool, barrier, and future wearing course between
centerline of bearings, the cross-frames at the pier, two sets of bearings
per beam line, and the pedestals.
The additional dead load is
approximately 5 kips for the fascia beams and 6 kips for the interior
beams.
Table 11.4.3.5 - Superstructure Dead Loads (kips)
Load/Location
V1
V2
V3
V4
V5
V6
Superstructure/Bearings/Pedestals
284
298
298
298
298
284
JANUARY 2004
[3.6.1]
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-99
Live Load
First, the maximum reaction at the pier due to a single lane of HL-93 live
load must be determined.
After comparing results from several
configurations, the double truck with lane load shown in Figure 11.4.3.4
was found to produce the largest reaction.
Live Load Configuration For Maximum Pier Reaction

Figure 11.4.3.4
Table 11.4.3.6 lists the live load reactions at the pier for different
numbers of lanes loaded. It also includes the maximum reaction for
fatigue, which occurs when the center axle of the fatigue truck is directly
over the pier.
[3.6.1.3.1]
[3.6.1.4.1]
Table 11.4.3.6 Live Load Reactions on Pier (per lane)
Loading
Truck Load
Product of
Reaction with
Multiple
Total
Uniform
Presence
Reaction
Load w
Factor and
= R/10
Dynamic Load
Lane Load
Allowance
Reaction
Double Truck
(kips)
(kips)
Load Factors
(kips)
(kips/ft)
1 Lane
134.1 - Double Truck
83.2
1.200.90=1.08
234.7
23.5
2 Lanes
134.1 Double Truck
83.2
1.000.90=0.90
195.6
19.6
3 Lanes
83.2
0.850.90=0.765
166.2
16.6
4 Lanes
83.2
0.650.90=0.585
127.1
12.7
Fatigue
73.3 Fatigue Truck
0.0
1.00
73.3
7.3
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-100
The next step is to determine the live load cases that will produce the
maximum force effects in the cap, columns, and foundation of the pier.
This is done by positioning the single lane reactions in lanes across the
transverse bridge cross-section to get the desired effect.
For instance, to obtain the maximum positive moment in the pier cap,
place one or two live load lane reactions on the deck such that the beams
located between the columns receive the maximum load. Figure 11.4.3.5
illustrates the live load cases used in the example. Table 11.4.3.7
contains beam reactions for each of the load cases. Load distribution for
determination of values in the table is based on assuming simple
supports at each beam.
For example, for Live Load Case 2:
w = 23.5 kips/ft
V1 = V6 = 0
V2 = V5 = 23.5
(9 8.50)
V = V = 23.5 9
3
1
= 0.3 kips
9
1
1
+ 23.5 0.5 8.75 = 117.2 kips
2
9
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 11.4.3.5
11-101
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-102
Table 11.4.3.7 - Superstructure Live Load Beam Reactions (kips)

(includes dynamic load allowance)
Live
Load
Location
V1
V2
V3
V4
V5
V6
One Lane Positive Cap Moment
1.0
125.4
One Lane Over Center Column
0.0
0.3
108.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
117.2
117.2
0.3
0.0
One Lane At Gutter Line
143.1
94.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Two Lanes Positive Cap Moment
37.6
165.8
160.0
28.5
0.0
0.0
Two Lanes Over Center Column
0.0
32.9
163.1
163.1
32.9
0.0
Three Lanes Over Center Column
5.8
108.6
134.6
134.6
108.6
5.8
Four Lanes
51.0
95.8
107.2
107.2
95.8
51.0
Fatigue-One Lane Positive Cap Moment
0.3
39.0
33.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
FatigueOne Lane Over Center Column
0.0
0.1
36.4
36.4
0.1
0.0
10
Fatigue One lane At Gutter Line
44.6
29.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Case
Braking Force
For this example, braking forces due to four lanes of traffic are assumed
to transmit a longitudinal (perpendicular to the pier) force that is evenly
distributed to the three columns.
[3.6.4]
Begin by determining if a truck by itself or if truck plus lane loading

governs the braking force.
Truck alone:
0.25 (8 + 32 + 32) = 18.0 kips
Controls
Truck plus lane:
0.05 [8 + 32 + 32 + (2 130 0.64)] = 11.9 kips
Then the design force is:
BR = 18.0 (# of lanes) (multiple presence factor)
= 18.0 4 0.65 = 46.8 kips
Although the lateral braking force is to be applied 6 feet above the top of
deck, it gets transferred to the pier through the bearings. In order to
satisfy statics and make the two load systems equivalent, transfer of the
lateral force down to the bearing level requires the addition of a moment
couple equal to:
L BR [6 ft + (distance from top of deck to bearings)]
Figure 11.4.3.6 illustrates this. The moment couple consists of vertical

forces at the abutments.
Because the distance from abutment to
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-103
abutment is very large relative to the transfer height, the vertical forces
are negligible and will be ignored. Therefore, we can conclude that for
pier analysis, the braking force can be applied at the top of the pier.
Equivalent Load Systems

Figure 11.4.3.6
Height of load application yBR above the top of footing is:

yBR = 26.00 3.75 = 22.25 ft
The moment at the base of the columns is:
1
= 341.1 kip ft/column
3
MperpBR = 46.8 22.25
[3.8.1.2.2]
Wind on Superstructure
For the wind load on the superstructure, the deck functions as a
horizontal 2-span continuous beam with wind pressure acting on the
exposed edge area of the superstructure. The reaction at the fixed end
5
for a propped cantilever beam is /8 of the uniformly applied load. Then
5
for a 2-span continous beam, /8 of wind from both spans is carried by
the pier and the tributary area for superstructure wind is:
5
2
130 9.75 = 1584 ft
8

A wsup = 2
The wind on superstructure load WSsup is:

WS sup = PB A wsup
where PB = base wind pressure from LRFD Table 3.8.1.2.2-1 for

various attack angles.
For example, for a wind attack angle skewed 30 degrees to the
superstructure:
PBtransv = PBpar = 0.041 ksf
PBlong = PBperp = 0.012 ksf
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-104
WS suppar = 0.041 1584 = 64.9 kips

L par1 = L par2 = L par3 = L par4 = L par5 = L par6 =
64.9
6
= 10.8 kips
WSsupperp = 0.012 1584 = 19.0 kips
Similar to the braking force, the longitudinal wind component on the

superstructure can be applied at the top of the pier for analysis. The
height of application yperp above the top of footing is:
yperp = 26.00 3.75 = 22.25 ft
Then, for a wind attack angle skewed 30 degrees to the superstructure,
the moment at the base of the columns is:
1
3
Mwsupperp = 19.0 22.25
For the analysis model, the transverse wind component will be applied at
the centroid of the pier cap. Transfer of the transverse wind component
from the centroid of the exposed superstructure area to the centroid of
the pier cap requires the addition of vertical loads at the bearings
equivalent to the reduction in moment Mred. For a wind attack angle
skewed 30 degrees:
Mred = WS suppar (dist. from superstr. centroid to pier cap centroid)
9.75 4.67
+
= 467.9 kip ft
2
2
= 64.9
The additional vertical loads are calculated assuming the moment is

applied at the center of the bridge and the deck is rigid. The I of the
beams is determined and vertical loads V are based on the formula:
M
x
V = red beam
Ibeams
where xbeam = distance from center of bridge to centerline of beam
2
and Ibeams = xbeam

Then for Beam 1 (left fascia beam with vertical load V1) and a wind
attack angle skewed 30 degrees:
x beam1 = 22.5 ft
2
Ibeams = x = (22.5) + (13.5) + (4.5) + (4.5) + (13.5) + (22.5)
=1417.5 ft2
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN

V1 =
467.9(22.5 )
1417.5
11-105
= 7.4 kips
The wind on superstructure loads applied to the pier are summarized in

Table 11.4.3.8.
Table 11.4.3.8 Wind on Superstructure Loads
Wind Attack
Angle
0 Degree Skew
15 Degree Skew
30 Degree Skew
Lpar1
Lpar2
Lpar3
Lpar4
Lpar5
V1
V2
V3
V4
V5
V6
(kips)
(kips)
(kips)
(kips)
(kips)
(kips)
13.2
13.2
13.2
13.2
13.2
13.2
9.1
5.4
1.8
-1.8
-5.4
-9.1
11.6
11.6
11.6
11.6
11.6
11.6
8.0
4.8
1.6
-1.6
-4.8
-8.0
10.8
10.8
10.8
10.8
10.8
10.8
7.4
4.5
1.5
-1.5
-4.5
-7.4
8.7
8.7
8.7
1.2
-1.2
-3.6
4.5
4.5
-0.6
-1.8
8.7
45 Degree Skew
6.0
4.5
60 Degree Skew
[3.8.2]
3.1
8.7
3.6
4.5
4.5
1.8
0.6
Lpar6
8.7
-6.0
4.5
-3.1
Mwsupperp
(kip-ft/col)
0.0
70.5
140.9
187.6
223.2
An additional wind on superstructure load is considered for the case

where there is no live load and the wind is oriented at 0 degrees. The
load represents uplift on the bottom of the deck and is called the vertical
wind on superstructure load. The deck was assumed hinged over the pier
for this load case. A tributary length of 130 feet (265 feet) was used
with the deck width of 51.33 feet. A 0.020 ksf pressure produces a
vertical force of:
Vertical force:
WSv = 51.33 0.020 130 = 133.5 kips
Eccentricity of Vertical force:
51.33
= 12.83 ft
e wsv =
4
Overturning Moment:
Mwsv = 133.5 12.83 = 1713 k-ft
The vertical force applied to the pier at each bearing location can be
calculated using the formula:
V=
WS v
N
Mwsv x beam
Ibeams
where N = number of beams
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-106
For example, at the bearing location for Beam 1 (left fascia beam with
vertical load V1):
- 133.5 1713(22.5)
V =
+
= 4.9 kips
1
6
1417.5
Table 11.4.3.9 summarizes the vertical wind on superstructure loads.
Table 11.4.3.9 Vertical Wind on Superstructure Loads (kips)
[3.8.1.2.3]
Wind Attack Angle
V1
V2
V3
V4
V5
V6
0 Degree Skew
4.9
-5.9
-16.8
-27.7
-38.6
-49.4
Wind on Substructure
A wind load with a base wind pressure PB of 0.040 ksf, resolved into
components for wind attack angles that are skewed, is applied directly to
the pier. See Table 11.4.3.10. This wind load was applied as line loads
to the pier cap and column members in the structural analysis model.
Assuming 1 foot of cover over the tops of the footings, the projected area
2
of the perpendicular face is 65.3 ft . The parallel face has an area of
2
2
229.4 ft for the pier cap and 149.2 ft for the columns.
Table 11.4.3.10 Wind on Substructure (ksf)
Pressure on
Pressure on
Perpendicular Face
Parallel Face
0 Degree Skew
0.040
0.000
15 Degree Skew
0.039
0.010
30 Degree Skew
0.035
0.020
45 Degree Skew
0.028
0.028
60 Degree Skew
0.020
0.035
Wind Attack Angle
[3.8.1.3]
Wind on Live Load

The wind on live load was assumed to have the same tributary length as
the wind on superstructure load. It is applied at 6 feet above the top of
the deck.
Tributary length for wind on live load:

5
= 2 130 = 162.5 ft
L
trib
8
The wind on live load WL is:
WL = PB L trib
where PB = base wind pressure from LRFD Table 3.8.1.3-1 for various
wind attack angles.
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN

For example, for
superstructure:
wind
attack
11-107
angle
skewed 30
degrees
to
the
PBtransv = Pspar = 0.082 klf

PBlong = PBperp = 0.024 klf
WL par = 0.082 162.5 = 13.3 kips
Then the lateral load L applied to the pier cap at each beam location
is:
13.3
= 2.2 kips
L par1 = L par2 = L par3 = L par4 = L par5 = L par6 =
6
WL
perp
= 0.024 162.5 = 3.9 kips
Similar to the wind on superstructure load, the longitudinal wind on live load
component can be applied at the top of the pier for analysis. The height of
application yperp above the top of footing is:
yperp = 26.00 3.75 = 22.25 ft
Then for a wind attack angle skewed 30 degrees to the superstructure, the
moment at the base of the columns is:
1
3
MWLperp = 3.9 22.25
Again, similar to the wind on superstructure load, the transverse wind on live
load component will be applied at the centroid of the pier cap. This will
require the addition of vertical loads at the bearings equivalent to the
reduction in moment. For a wind attack angle skewed 30 degrees:
Mred = WL par (6 ft + dist. from top of deck to pier cap centroid)
= 13.3 6.00 + (9.75 2.67) +
4.67
2
= 205.0 kip ft
Then for Beam 1 (left fascia beam with vertical load V1) and a wind attack
angle skewed 30 degrees:
V =
1
Mred x beam
Ibeams
205.0 (22.5)
1417.5
= 3.3 kips
The wind on live load values are summarized in Table 11.4.3.11.
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-108
Table 11.4.3.11 Wind on Live Load

Wind Attack
Angle
0 Degree Skew
15 Degree Skew
30 Degree Skew
45 Degree Skew
60 Degree Skew
Lpar1
Lpar2
Lpar3
Lpar4
Lpar5
Lpar6
V1
V2
V3
V4
V5
V6
(kips)
(kips)
(kips)
(kips)
(kips)
(kips)
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
4.0
2.4
0.8
-0.8
-2.4
-4.0
2.4
2.4
2.4
2.4
2.4
2.4
3.5
2.1
0.7
-0.7
-2.1
-3.5
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
3.3
2.0
0.7
-0.7
-2.0
-3.3
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
2.6
1.6
0.5
-0.5
-1.6
-2.6
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
1.3
0.8
0.3
-0.3
-0.8
1.3
MWLperp
(kip-ft/col)
0.0
14.8
28.9
38.6
46.0
C. Structural
Analysis
To determine the design forces in different portions of the pier a

structural analysis was performed with a matrix analysis program. Gross
section properties were used for all members. Fixed supports were
provided at the top of each footing.
D. Design of the
Pier Cap
1. Design Loads
The pier cap is designed for dead and live loads. Wind and truck braking
loads are assumed not to contribute to maximum vertical load effects for
the design of the pier cap.
Four load combinations are examined
(Strength I, Strength IV, Service I, and Fatigue). Strength I and IV are
used to determine basic flexural and shear demands:
U1 = 1.25 DC + 1.75 (LL + IM)
U2 = 1.5 DC
Service I is used to check the distribution of flexural reinforcement (crack

control):
S1 = 1.00 DC + 1.00 (LL + IM)
The Fatigue limit state is used to ensure that adequate fatigue resistance
is provided.
F = 0.75 (LL + IM)
The pier cap design forces are listed in Tables 11.4.3.12 and 11.4.3.13.
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-109
For simplicity, negative bending moments are given at the column

centerline. Another reasonable approach would be to use the average of
the moments at the column centerline and the column face for the design
negative moment.
Again for simplicity, pier cap shears at the columns are given at the
column centerline. For pier configurations where beam reactions are
located over a column, the design shear should be taken at the column
face.
Table 11.4.3.12 Pier Cap Design Moments
Positive Bending Moment
Negative Bending Moment
(located at CL Beam 2)
(located at CL Column 1)
(kipft)
(kipft)
Strength I
1563 (LL Case 4)
2337 (LL Case 3)
Strength IV
689
1691
Service I
1025 (LL Case 4)
1655 (LL Case 3)
Fatigue (max)
113 (LL Case 8)
125 (LL Case 10)
Fatigue (min)
-4 (LL Case 10)
459
1118
Load Combination
Permanent Loads
(unfactored)
Table 11.4.3.13 Pier Cap Design Shears (kips)

Load
Location Along Pier Cap
Combination
CL Beam 1
CL Column 1
CL Beam 2
CL Beam 3
CL Column 2
Strength I
614 (LL Case 3)
648 (LL Case 4)
633 (LL Case 4)
709 (LL Case 4)
722 (LL Case 4)
Strength IV
437
463
444
481
497
291
308
296
321
331
Permanent Loads
(unfactored)
2. Design Positive Moment Reinforcement

The flexural design of the cap is accomplished with five checks: flexural
strength, crack control, fatigue, maximum reinforcement and minimum
reinforcement. An appropriate level of reinforcement to satisfy the
flexural force demand is computed first.
[5.7.2.2]
[5.7.3.2]
Flexural Resistance
of reinforcing based on Mu and d. For an fc of 4.0 ksi and a 1 of 0.85
the equation for the required area of steel reduces to:
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-110
Mu = Mn = As fy d
2
A s fy
a=
0.85 f 'c b
A s fy
Mu = A s f y d
1.7 f 'c b
A s 60 1
Mu = 0.90 A s (60) d
1.7 4 40 12
0.993 A s 4.5 d A s + Mu = 0
2
As =
[5.10.3.1.3]
4.5 d 20.25 d 3.972 Mu

1.986
Compute d values for both a single layer of reinforcement and a double

layer of reinforcement. Assume the stirrups are #16 bars, that the
primary steel is #32 bars, and that the clear dimension between layers is
1.5 inches. The d for a single layer of reinforcement is:
1.27
d = 56 2 0.625
= 52.74 in
2
The assumed d for two layers of reinforcement is:
1.5
d = 56 2 0.625 1.27
= 51.36 in
2
Using the Strength I design forces and assuming one layer of
reinforcement for the positive moment steel and two layers of
reinforcement for the negative steel, the required areas of steel can be
found. They are presented in Table 11.4.3.14.
Table 11.4.3.14 Trial Longitudinal Reinforcement
Location
Positive
Moment
Negative
Moment
[5.7.3.4]
Mu(kip-ft)
As(req)
Trial Bars
As(prov)
1563
52.74
6.78
6-#32
7.62
2337
51.36
10.59
12-#29
12.00
Crack Control
To ensure that cracking is limited to small cracks that are well
distributed, a limit is placed on the service load stress in the reinforcing
steel. LRFD Equation 5.7.3.4-1 defines the maximum stress permitted:
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN

fs fsa =
z
3d
11-111
0.6 fy

with the trial reinforcement. To simplify the calculations, the section is
assumed to be singly reinforced.
n=
[5.4.2.4 & 5.7.1]
Es
29,000
=
= 7.96
Ec
33,000 (0.145)1.5 4.0
Use n=8
n A s = 8(7.62) = 60.96 in

b
fc
N.A.
d
d-x
nAs
fs/n
Cracked Section Diagram
Figure 11.4.3.7
bx
x
= n A s (d x)
2
(40) x 2
2
= 60.96 (52.74 x)
solving, x
11.25 in
x
11.25
j d = d = 52.74
= 48.99 in
3
3
M
1025 12
=
= 32.9 ksi
Actual fs =
A s j d 7.62 (48.99)
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-112
For z = 130 kips/in and dC = 2.64 in (2.0 in + of #32 bar), the area of
concrete assumed to participate with the reinforcement is:
2 dc b 2 2.64 40
2
A=
=
= 35.20 in
N
6
z
Allowable fs =
Allowable fs
3d
130
3
2.64 35.20
= 28.7 ksi < 0.6 fy = 36 ksi
28.7 ksi < 32.9 ksi
NO GOOD
Increase the amount of steel provided by the ratio of stresses:

32.9
2
As =
7.62 = 8.74 in
28.7
2
Try 7-#32 bars (As = 8.89 in )

Then:
2
n A s = 71.12 in
d = 52.74 in
x = 12.03 in
jd = 48.73 in
Actual fs =
1025(12)
8.89(48.73)
= 28.4 ksi
dc = 2.64 in
2
A = 30.17 in
Allowable
[5.5.3]
fs
130
3
2.64 30.17
= 30.2 ksi > 28.4 ksi
OK
Fatigue
limits to ensure that adequate fatigue resistance is provided.
The unfactored dead load moment in the positive moment region is 459
kip-ft.
The extreme moments on the cross section when fatigue loading is
applied are:
Maximum moment = 459 + 113 = 572 k-ft
Minimum moment = 459 + (-4) = 455 k-ft
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-113

M
572 12
fmax =
=
= 15.8 ksi
A s j d 8.89 (48.73)
M
455 12
fmin =
=
= 12.6 ksi
A s j d 8.89 (48.73)
The stress range in the reinforcement (ff) is the difference between the
two stresses
ff = (15.8 12.6) = 3.2 ksi
[5.5.3.2]

r
ff(max) = 21 0.33 fmin + 8 = 21 0.33 (12.6) + 8 (0.3)
h
OK
ff(max) = 19.2 > 3.2 ksi
[5.7.3.3.1]

To ensure that the cross section is not over-reinforced, the depth of the
section in compression is compared to the distance to the tension
reinforcement.

A s fy
8.89 60
a=
=
= 3.92 in
0.85 f' c b 0.85 4.0 40
a
3.92
c=
=
= 4.61 in
1 0.85
c
de
[5.7.3.3.2]
4.61
52.74
= 0.087 < 0.42
OK

To prevent a brittle failure mode, adequate flexural reinforcement needs
to be placed in the cross section. The assumed cracking stress of
concrete is:
fr = 0.24 f ' c = 0.24 4 = 0.48 ksi

1
1
4
b t3 =
40 (56)3 = 585,400 in
Ig =
12
12
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-114
The distance from the centroid to the tension face is:

yt = 28.0 in
Combining these terms to determine the cracking moment produces:
fr I g
0.48 585,400
=
= 836 kip-ft
Mcr =
yt
28.0 (12)
To ensure ductility after cracking moment is reached, the force is
increased by 20 percent:
1.2Mcr = 1003 kip-ft
The capacity of the steel provided is:
Mr = As fy (d a/2)
Which after substituting values becomes:
Mr = 0.9 (8.89) (60) 52.74
3.92
2 12
= 2031 kip-ft > 1003 kip-ft
OK
Provide 1 layer of 7 - #32 bars for positive reinforcement.

3. Design Negative Moment Reinforcement
The service, and fatigue checks for the negative moment steel are
performed next.
Flexural Resistance
The required area of steel to satisfy the strength check was presented in
2
Table 11.4.3.14. Try 2 layers of 6-#29 bars (As = 12.00 in ) with a clear
spacing between layers equal to 1.5 inches.
d = 56 2 0.625 1.128
[5.7.3.4]
1.5
2
= 51.50 in
Crack Control
with the trial reinforcement.
The transformed area of steel is:

2
n A s = 8(12.00) = 96.0 in
The location of the neutral axis satisfies:
(40) x
2
= 96.0 (51.50 x) solving, x = 13.50 in
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-115
The lever arm between service load flexural force components is:
x
13.50
j d = d = 51.50
= 47.00 in
3
3
And the stress in the reinforcement is:
M
1655 12
Actual fs =
=
= 35.2 ksi
A s j d 12.00 (47.00)
For a z of 130 kips/in and dC = 2.56 in (2.0 in + of #29 bar),

A=
2 2 + 1.128 + 0.75 b
N
2 3.878 40
12
= 25.85 in
The permitted stress in the reinforcement is:

z
130
=
= 32.1 ksi < 0.6 fy = 36 ksi
Allowable fs =
3
3d A
2.56 25.85
c
Allowable fs = 32.1 ksi < 35.2 ksi
NO GOOD
The actual stress is larger than the permitted. Increase the amount of
reinforcement by the ratio of the stresses:
35.2
2
As =
12.00 = 13.16 in
32.1
2
Try 2 layers of 6-#32 bars (As = 15.24 in )

2
n A s = 121.92 in
d = 15.36 in
x = 14.91 in
jd = 46.39 in
Actual fs =
1655 12
15.24 46.39
= 28.1 ksi
dc = 2.64
2
A = 26.8 in
Allowable fs =
[5.5.3]
130
3
2.64 26.8
= 31.4 ksi > 28.1 ksi
OK
Fatigue
The moments on the negative moment section when fatigue loading is
applied vary from:
Maximum moment = 1118 + 125 = 1243 k-ft
Minimum moment = 1118 + 0 = 1118 k-ft
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-116
M
1243 12
fmax =
=
= 21.1 ksi
A s j d 15.24 (46.39)
M
1118 12
fmin =
=
= 19.0 ksi
A s j d 15.24 (46.39)
The stress range in the reinforcement (ff) is the difference between the
two stresses
ff = (21.1 19.0) = 2.1 ksi
[5.5.3.2]

r
ff(max) = 21 0.33 fmin + 8 = 21 0.33 (19.0) + 8 (0.3) = 17.1 ksi
h
OK
ff(max) = 17.1 > 2.1 ksi
[5.7.3.3.1]

A s fy
15.24 60
a=
= 6.72 in
=
0.85 f 'c b 0.85 4.0 40
a
6.72
=
= 7.91 in
c=
1 0.85
c
d
[5.7.3.3.2]
7.91
51.36
OK
= 0.15 < 0.42

1.2Mcr = 1003 kip-ft
The moment capacity provided is:
Mr = As fy (d a/2)
=
0.9 (15.24) (60) 51.36
3292 kip-ft > 1003 kip-ft
6.72
2 12
OK
Provide 2 layers of 6-#32 bars for negative moment reinforcement.
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-117
4. Design Shear Reinforcement

The maximum factored design shear force is 722 kips (Strength I for Live
Load Case 4) and occurs at the centerline of Column 2.
V
722
= 802 kips
Min. required Vn = u =
v
0.90
The shear design for reinforced concrete elements is a two step process.
First, the shear capacity of the concrete section is determined. Second,
the amount of shear steel is determined. The concrete capacity is
dependent on , the angle of inclination of the concrete struts, and , a
factor indicating the ability of the diagonally cracked concrete to transmit
tension.
[5.8.3.4.1]
Determine Concrete Shear Capacity

The minimum shear reinforcement will be provided in the section.
Therefore, = 2.0 and = 45 degrees
dv is the distance between the internal flexural force components. The

smaller distance between the C and T centroids is for the negative
moment steel:
6.72
a
d v = d = 51.36
= 48.0 in
2
2
[5.8.2.9]
However, dv need not be less than:

0.72 h = 0.72 56 = 40.3 in
or
0.90 d = 0.90 51.36 = 46.2 in
Use dv = 48.0 in
[5.8.3.3-3]
With dv known, the concrete shear capacity can be computed:

Vc = 0.0316 f 'c b v d v = 0.0316 2 4 40 48 = 243 kips
Determine Stirrup Spacing

The difference between the required shear capacity and the capacity
provided by the concrete is the required capacity for the shear steel.
Min. required Vs = Vn Vc = 802 243 = 559 kips
Use #16 double U stirrups that will be vertical. Four legs of #16 bars
have an area of:
2
A v = 4 A b = 4 0.31 = 1.24 in
JANUARY 2004
[5.8.3.3-4]
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-118
The capacity of shear steel is:

[A v fv dv cot()]
Vs =
s
Which can be rearranged to solve for the stirrup spacing:
[A v fy d v cot( )] [1.24 60 48.0 1]
s
=
= 6.4 in
Vs
559
To simplify construction, try a constant stirrup spacing of 6.0 inches
between columns and in pier cap cantilever.
[5.8.2.5]
Check Minimum Shear Reinforcement Requirements

Determine maximum stirrup spacing that satisfies minimum transverse
reinforcement requirements:
' b s
A v 0.0316 fc v
fy
Rearranging and solving for stirrup spacing s,

A v fy
'
0.0316 b v fc
[5.8.2.7]
[5.8.2.9]
1.24 60
0.0316 40 4
= 29.4 in >> 6 in
OK
Check Maximum Shear Reinforcement Spacing Requirements

'
First determine if v u < 0.125fc :
'
0.125fc = 0.125(4) = 0.50 ksi

vu =
Vu Vp
b v d v
722 0
0.9 40 48.0
= 0.42 ksi < 0.50 ksi
Therefore,
Smax = 0.8dv = 0.8 48 = 38.4 in
or Smax = 24.0 in
Smax = 24.0 in >> 6 in
GOVERNS
OK
Use #16 double U stirrups at a 6 inch spacing for shear reinforcement

in the pier cap.
[5.6.3]
5. Cantilever Capacity Check

Check the capacity of the cantilever using strut and tie methods. Begin
by determining the vertical reaction applied to the cantilever.
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-119
Self weight of cantilever:
40 56 + 36 1
5.25 0.150 = 10.0 kips

12 2 12
Pself =
Dead load from the superstructure is:

Psuper = 28.4 kips
The reaction from one lane of live load is:
PU = 143.1 kips (LL Case 3)
Then the factored vertical load on the cantilever is:
1.25 (10.0 + 284 ) 1.75 (143.1) = 618 kips
Assume a simple model with a single horizontal tension tie centered on
the top reinforcement and a single compression strut between the center
of the tension tie below the bearing and the center of the column. A
simple schematic with the resultant loads in the strut and tie is shown in
Figure 11.4.3.8.
Cantilever Strut and Tie Model

Figure 11.4.3.8
Tension Tie
The required capacity of the tension tie is:
T 537
=
= 597 kips
0.9
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-120
2
[5.6.3.4.1]
The tie is composed of 12-#32 bars (As = 15.24 in ). With standard

hooks at the ends, the bars are developed by the time they reach the
intersection of the tie and strut. Then the capacity of the tie is:
Pn = fy A st = 60 15.24 = 914 kips >> 597 kips
OK
Concrete Strut
The required capacity of the concrete compression strut is:
C
819
=
= 1170 kips
0.70
The width of the strut (measured along direction parallel to pier) is

chosen based on the width of the bearing pads and adjusted for the angle
of the strut. The bearing pads are 24 inches wide and the strut is
inclined at 49 degrees from horizontal. Then the width of the strut is:
W = 24 sin 49 = 18.1 in
Using the pier cap thickness of 40 inches for the thickness of the strut,
the cross-sectional area of the strut is:
2
A cs = W T = 18.1 40.0 = 724 in
[C5.6.3.3.3]
The allowable compressive stress in the strut is dependent on the strain

in the tension ties crossing the strut. The strain in the tension tie is
found assuming a cracked cross section.
P
537
=
=
= 35.2 ksi
A 15.24
The strain in the tie is:
35.2
s =
=
= 0.00121
E 29,000
[5.6.3.3.3]
The concrete strain component is:

2
1 = s + ( s + 0.002) cot
2
= 0.00121 + (0.00121 + 0.002) cot (49 ) = 0.00364
The limiting compressive stress in the strut is:

f' c
4
fcu =
=
= 2.82 ksi
0.8 + 170 1 0.8 + 170 0.00364
[5.6.3.3.1]
The capacity of the strut is:

Pn = A cs fcu = 724 2.82 = 2042 kips >> 1170 kips
OK
JANUARY 2004
[5.6.3.5]
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-121
Check the Node Region

The concrete compressive stress in node regions needs to be examined to
ensure that stresses are below acceptable limits. For node regions
anchoring a one-direction tension tie, the limit on compressive stresses
is:
0.75 f 'c = 0.75 0.70 4.0 = 2.10 ksi
By inspection, the node section on the concrete strut side governs. The
compressive stress on the node is:
P
819
=
= 1.13 ksi << 2.10 ksi
OK
A cs 724
[5.7.3.4]
6. Longitudinal Skin Reinforcement

The effective depth for both positive and negative moment reinforcement
is greater than 3.0 feet, so skin reinforcement is required. The minimum
area of skin reinforcement required on each vertical face of the pier cap
is:
Positive moment region:
2
A sk 0.012(de 30 ) = 0.012(52.74 30 ) = 0.27 in /ft
but not more than A sk
As
4
8.89
4
= 2.22 in /ft
Negative moment region:

2
A sk 0.012 (51.36 30 ) = 0.26 in /ft
but not more than A sk
15.24
4
= 3.81 in /ft
The skin reinforcement must be placed within d/2 of the main

d
reinforcement with a spacing not to exceed /6 or 12 inches.
Using the smallest d =
d
2
d
6
=
=
51.36
2
51.36
6
= 25.68 in
= 8.56 in
Choose 5-#16 bars equally spaced between the top and bottom
2
reinforcement on each face. (Spacing = 7.79 in and As=0.48 in /ft)
[5.10.8.2-1]
7. Temperature Steel Check

A minimum amount of longitudinal steel needs to be provided on the
vertical faces to ensure that shrinkage and temperature cracks remain
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-122
small and well distributed. The minimum amount of steel to be provided

is:
Ag
(40 56)
2
Min. total A s 0.11
= 0.11
= 4.11 in
fy
60
The actual total reinforcement area for both vertical faces is:
2
Actual total A s = 2 [3 (1.27) + 5 (0.31)] = 10.72 in > 4.11 in
8. Summary
Figure 11.4.3.9 details the final reinforcement in the pier cap.
OK
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Pier Cap Reinforcement

Figure 11.4.3.9
11-123
JANUARY 2004
E. Column Design
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-124
Design Forces
Table 11.4.3.15 lists the unfactored axial loads and bending moments at
the top and bottom of the columns when the pier is subjected to various
loadings.
The sign convention for the axial loads is positive for downward forces
and negative for upward forces. The sign convention for the bending
moments in the parallel direction (Mpar) is beam convention. Positive
moments cause tension on the bottom side of the column member
which is defined as the right side of the column. Negative moments
cause tension on the top side which is defined as the left side. (See
Figure 11.4.3.10.)
Sign Convention for Mpar

Figure 11.4.3.10
For moments in the perpendicular direction (Mperp), all lateral loads are
assumed applied in the same direction. Therefore, all moments are
shown as positive.
Moments shown in the table due to wind transverse to the bridge are
based on a wind directed from right to left. (Column 3 is on the
windward side of the pier.)
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-125
Table 11.4.3.15 Unfactored Column Member Forces (k, k-ft)

Load
Dead Load
Live Load Case 1

One Lane
Live Load Cases 2 and 3
One Lane (max/min)
Live Load Cases 4 and 5
Two Lanes (max/min)
Live Load Case 6
Three Lanes
Live Load Case 7
Four Lanes
Braking
45 F Temperature Drop
35 F Temperature Rise
Wind at 0 on Superstructure
and Substructure
and Substructure
and Substructure
Vertical Wind
Wind on Live Load at 0
Column 1
Column 2
Column 3
(Leeward)
(Center)
(Windward)
Force
Top
Bottom
Top
Bottom
Top
608
629
663
684
608
Bottom
629
Mpar
-9.0
4.3
9.0
-4.3
Mperp
108
108
137
137
-10
-10
-6.5
Mpar
-72
32
59
-32
6.7
Mperp
233/19
233/19
196/9
196/9
19/-5
19/-5
20/-19
Mpar
47/-40
19/-12
0/-6
13/0
40/-20
Mperp
188/47
188/47
297/213
297/213
47/-8
47/-8
66/12
Mpar
-66/-82
38/32
67/0
0/-33
-7/-32
Mperp
97
97
304
304
97
97
-38
Mpar
-79
38
79
Mperp
138
138
232
232
160
160
Mpar
-34
16
34
-16
Mperp
Mpar
Mperp
341
341
341
-9
-9
18
18
-9
-9
Mpar
129
-141
-129
141
Mperp
-14
-14
Mpar
-100
110
100
-110
Mperp
36
36
-36
-36
275
Mpar
-249
270
-279
285
-246
Mperp
30
30
-29
-29
Mpar
-204
221
-229
233
-201
226
Mperp
182
182
182
12
12
-12
-12
Mpar
-86
93
-96
98
-84
95
Mperp
294
295
294
-89
-46
-46
-89
Mpar
Mperp
11
11
-11
-11
Mpar
-50
55
-56
58
-50
55
Mperp
-9
-9
Mpar
-41
44
-46
47
-41
44
Mperp
29
29
29
-4
-4
Mpar
-17
18
-19
19
-17
18
Mperp
46
46
46
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-126
The following four limit states are examined for the columns:
Strength I: U1 = p DC + 1.75 LL + 1.75 BR + 0.50 TU
Strength III: U3 = p DC + 1.40 WS + 0.50 TU
Strength IV: U3 = 1.50 DC + 0.50 + TU
Strength V:
U5 = p DC + 1.35 LL + 1.35 BR + 0.40 WS + 1.00 WL + 0.50 TU
Load combinations were tabulated for the appropriate limit states for
each of the various live load cases, wind angles, the temperature rise and
fall, and also for maximum and minimum DC load factors.
Then the worst case loadings (maximum axial load with maximum
moment, minimum axial load with maximum moment) were chosen from
each limit state from the tabulated load combinations. These are shown
in Table 11.4.3.16. The critical cases for the column among those listed
in the table are shown in bold print.
Table 11.4.3.16 - Column Design Forces
Axial Load P
Mpar
Mperp
(kips)
(kip-ft)
(kip-ft)
1396
597
544
55
597
864
137
413
545
200
412
387
454
(a) Column 1 Bottom: Temp = -45 F
939
64
(b) Column 2 Bottom: Temp = -45 F
1035
1274
58
624
539
114
624
Load Combination
(a) Column 2 Bottom:
Strength I:
= 1.25,
LL Case 6, Temp = -45F
(b) Column 3 Bottom:
p = 0.90,
LL Case 1, Temp = -45F

p = 1.25,
Wind Skew = 60, Temp = -45F

Strength III:
p = 0.90,
Wind Skew = 60, Temp = -45 F

(c) Column 3 Bottom:
= 0.90,
Wind Skew = 0, Vertical Wind,

Temp = -45 F
Strength IV:
= 1.25,
LL Case 6, Wind Skew = 60,
Strength V:
Temp = -45F
= 0.90,
LL Case 1, Wind Skew = 60,

Temp = -45F
JANUARY 2004
[5.7.4.3]
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-127
Slenderness Effects
Each column is considered unbraced in both the parallel and
perpendicular directions. The dimension L from bottom of pier cap to
top of footing is 17.58 feet.
In the parallel direction, a fixed condition exists at the bottom and a

rotation-fixed, translation-free condition exists at the top.
For this
condition LRFD Table C4.6.2.5-1 recommends a K value of 1.20.
Then: r = 0.25 (column diameter)
=0.25 (3) = 0.75 ft
1.2(17.58)
KL
=
= 28.1 > 22

0.75
r par
Therefore, slenderness effects need to be considered for the parallel

direction.
In the perpendicular direction the columns can conservatively be
considered as cantilevers fixed at the bottom. For this condition LRFD
Table C4.6.2.5-1 recommends a K value of 2.1.
Then:
2.1 (17.58)
KL
=
= 49.2 > 22

0.75
r perp
Therefore, slenderness effects
perpendicular direction, also.
need
to
be
considered
for
the
Two choices are available to designers when including slenderness effects

in the design of columns. A moment magnification method is described
in LRFD Article 4.5.3.2.2. The other method is to use an iterative P-
analysis.
A P- analysis was used for this example. For simplicity and in order to
better match the computer model used, take the column height L equal
to the distance from the top of footing to the centroid of the pier cap.
For the perpendicular direction, the maximum factored moment and
corresponding axial load from Table 11.4.3.16 is:
Mperp = 624 kip ft, P = 1274 kips (Strength V (a))
Then the maximum equivalent lateral force Hperp applied at the top of the
column is:
Hperp =
Mperp
L
624
19.92
= 31.3 kips
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-128
This force produces a perpendicular displacement perp at the top of the

column:
H
perp =
perp
3EI
31.3 [(19.92) (12)]
3 (3644) (82450)
= 0.474 in
The structural model used in the analysis contained gross section

properties. To account for the reduced stiffness of a cracked column
section, the displacement was multiplied by an assumed cracked section
factor equal to 2.5. This factor is based on using LRFD Equation 5.7.4.3-2
with d equal to zero and corresponds to 40 percent of the gross section
properties being effective. (Other references suggest values ranging
from 30 percent to 70 percent be used for columns.) After updating the
equivalent lateral force for the P- moment, three additional iterations
were performed. The final longitudinal displacement was found to be
0.593 inches and the additional perpendicular moment due to
slenderness was 157 kip-feet. See Figure 11.4.3.11 and Table 11.4.3.17.
For the parallel direction, the corresponding factored moment from Table
11.4.3.16 is:
Mpar = 58 kip ft (Strength V (a))
A procedure similar to that done for the perpendicular direction was used
for the P- analysis. For the parallel direction, equations used to
compute Hpar and par are for a cantilever column fixed at one end and
free to deflect horizontally but not rotate at the other end (taken from
Manual of Steel Construction, Allowable Stress Design, Ninth Edition,
page 2-303). See Figure 11.4.3.12 and Table 11.4.3.18 for a summary
of the parallel direction P- analysis.
This process was repeated for the other three critical load cases shown in
Table 11.4.3.16.
JANUARY 2004
Mmax
H1 =
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
H2 = H1 + H1
H1L
3EI
cr1 = F
cr
P1
g1
= P cr1
H1 =
P1
H3 = H1 + H2
3
g1 =
11-129
H2L
g2 =
3EI
g3 =
H3L
3EI
cr2 = Fcr
g2
cr3 = Fcr g3
P 2
= P cr2
H2 =
P 2
Perpendicular Direction P- Procedure

Figure 11.4.3.11
P 3
= P cr3
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-130
Table 11.4.3.17 Perpendicular P- Moment

Equiv.
Lateral
Axial Load
Force
g for
Cracked
cr
gross
Section
for
section
Factor
cracked
produce
properties
Fcr
section
MP
H to
MP
(in)
(k-ft)
(kips)
2.5
0.948
100.6
5.1
0.552
2.5
1.380
146.5
7.4
1274
0.586
2.5
1.465
155.5
7.8
1274
0.593
2.5
1.483
157.4
(kips/column)
(kips/column)
(in)
31.3
1274
0.474
36.4
1274
38.7
39.1
Add 157 k-ft to column for slenderness in the perpendicular direction
2Mmax
H1 =
H2 = H1 + H1
H1L
12EI
cr1 = F
cr
P1
g2 =
g
g1
= P cr1
H1 =
2M
P1
g1 =
H3 = H1 + H2
H2L
12EI
cr2 = F
cr
g2
MP2 = P cr2
H2 =
2 M
P 2
Parallel Direction P- Procedure

Figure 11.4.3.12
g3 =
H3L
12EI
cr3 = Fcr g3
M
P 3
= P cr3
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-131
Table 11.4.3.18 Parallel P- Moment

Equiv.
g for
Cracked
Lateral
gross
Section
cr
Force
Axial Load
section
Factor
cracked
properties
Fcr
section
(kips/column)
(kips/column)
(in)
5.82
1274
0.0220
6.35
1274
6.46
1274
H to
MP
produce
MP
(in)
(k-ft)
(kips)
2.5
0.0500
5.3
0.53
0.0241
2.5
0.0603
6.4
0.64
0.0245
2.5
0.0613
6.5
Add 7 k-ft to column for slenderness in the parallel direction
The design forces presented in Table 11.4.3.19 are the factored axial
loads and resultant moments that include P- effects. Because of the
symmetry of the round cross section, the moments in the parallel and
perpendicular directions can be combined using the square root of the
sum of the squares (Pythagorean Theorem).
2
MR = Mpar + Mperp
Table 11.4.3.19 Critical Column Design Forces (kips, kip-ft)

Mpar
Total
Mpar
P-
Mpar
1396
Strength III (c)
387
454
Strength V (a)
1274
Strength V (b)
539
Load
Axial
Combination
Load
Strength I (a)
Mperp
Total
Resultant
Mperp
P-
Mperp
MR
597
169
766
766
14
468
468
58
65
624
157
781
784
114
119
624
58
682
692
The minimum amount of column reinforcement must be such that:

A s fy
'
A g fc
0.135
Then:
A g fc'
Min A s
fy
0.135 = 1018 4.0 0.135 = 9.16 in2
60.0
Try 12-#25 bars (As= 9.48 in ).
A computer program was used to generate the column strength

interaction diagram shown in Figure 11.4.3.13. The figure also displays
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-132
the design axial loads and moments for the critical load cases. All values
fall well within the capacity of the column.
The interaction diagram includes factors of 0.90 for flexure and 0.75
for axial compression.
Axial Load (kips)
COLUMN INTERACTION CURVE

36-inch Diameter, 12-#25 bars
Moment (k-ft)
Figure 11.4.3.13
[5.7.4.2]
Reinforcement Limit Check

For non-prestressed columns the maximum amount of longitudinal
reinforcement permitted is:
As
Ag
9.48
1018
= 0.00931 0.08
OK
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-133
[5.10.6.2]
Column Spirals
Per Mn/DOT standard practice, use spiral reinforcing for columns with
diameters up to 42. Use #13E bars with a 3 pitch for the spiral. The
anchorage of the spiral reinforcement shall be provided by 1 extra
turns of spiral bar at each end of the spiral unit.
[5.7.4.6]
Check reinforcement ratio of spiral to concrete core:

volume of spiral in one loop
ps =
volume of core for one pitch spacing
For a clear cover of 2, diameter of the core D c = 32 in.
Spiral reinforcement area A sp = 0.20 in2
Spiral bar diameter db = 0.50 in
Pitch spacing p = 3.0 in
Length of one loop
l sp =
[ (Dc db )]2 + p2
[ (32 0.50)]2 + (3.0)2
= 99.01 in
Then Actual
A sp l sp
0.20 99.01
ps =
=
= 0.00821
2
D
322
c
p
3.0
4
4
Reqd. Min.
Ag
f'
p s = 0.45
1 c
A
f
c
yh
4
1018
= 0.00797 < 0.00821
= 0.45
1
60
Dc 2
F. Design Piling
OK
Loads
For design of the piles and footings, additional loads which include the
weight of the footing and an assumed 2-0 of earth must be added to
the critical column design forces in Table 11.4.3.19.
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-134
Additional DC due to footing:

P = 10.0 13.0 4.50 0.150 = 87.8 kips
Mpar = Mperp = 0 kip ft
Earth above footing EV:
P = 2.0 (10 13)
1018
144
(0.120 ) = 29.5 kips
Mpar = Mperp = 0 kip ft
Use a maximum load factor of 1.35 and a minimum load factor of 0.90.
Also, the dynamic load allowance is to be removed from the live load
when designing foundation components entirely below ground.
For one live load lane (Live Load Case 1, Column 3):
Single Lane Truck Reaction w/Dynamic Load Allowance, R=134.1 kips
(From Table 11.4.3.6)
Then
R
1
Pred = R
(Mult. Presence Factor) (Double Truck Load F.)
DLA
No.Columns
= 134.1
134.1
1
(1.2) (0.90) = 12.0 kips
1.33
3
The reduction to Mpar is negligible and will be ignored.

For three live load lanes (Live Load Case 6, Column 2):
Pred = 134.1
134.1
1
(0.85) (0.90) = 8.5 kips
1.33
3
Then, for example, the Strength I(a) piling design forces are:
Axial Load = 1396 + 1.25 (87.8) + 1.35 (29.5) 1.75 (8.5) = 1531 kips
Mpar = 0 kip-ft
Mperp = 766 kip-ft
The values for all of the critical piling forces are shown in Table
11.4.3.21.
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-135
Table 11.4.3.21 Piling Design Forces

Mpar
Mperp
Axial Load
Bending Moment
Bending Moment
Load Combination
(kips)
(kipft)
(kipft)
Strength I (a)
1531
766
Strength III (c)
493
468
Strength V (a)
1412
65
781
Strength V (b)
628
119
682
Determine Required Number of Piles

As a starting point, estimate the number of piles needed by calculating
the number of piles required to resist the axial load and then add 10 to
20% more piles to resist overturning.
1519
= 9.4 piles
162
Naxial =
Try the trial pile layout presented in Figure 11.4.3.10 with 11 piles.
Knowing the loads applied to the footing and the layout of the piles, the
force in each of the pile can be determined. The equation to be used is:
Axial Load
Mpar x par Mperp x perp
+
+
P=
Number of Piles x par 2 x perp 2
The equation assumes that the footing functions as a rigid plate and that
the axial force in the piles due to applied moments is proportional to the
distance from the center of the pile group.
2
x par = 2 3.50 + 2 1.75 + 3 0 + 2 (1.75 ) + 2 (3.50 ) = 61.25 ft

2
x perp = 3 5.00 + 2 2.50 + 1 0 + 2 (-2.50 ) + 3 (5.00 ) = 175.00 ft
Then, for example, the Strength I(a) Corner Pile 1 load is:
P=
1531
11
0 3.50
61.25
766 5.00
175.00
= 161.1 kips
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-136
Trial Pile Layout

Figure 11.4.3.14
The factored pile loads at each corner of the footing (as identified in
Figure 11.4.3.14) are presented in Table 11.4.3.22. All are below the
162 kip capacity of the piles.
Table 11.4.3.22 Factored Pile Loads
Corner Pile Loads (kips)
Load Combination
Strength I (a)
161.1
161.1
117.3
117.3
Strength III (c)
71.6
18.1
71.6
18.1
Strength V(a)
154.4
147.0
109.8
102.3
Strength V(b)
83.4
69.8
44.4
30.8
Pile Load Table for Plan

Piling are driven until dynamic equation measurements indicate the pile
has reached refusal or the required design load indicated in the plan. The
service load resistance is monitored in the field using the Mn/DOT
modified ENR formula given in Section 2452.3E of the Mn/DOT Standard
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-137
Specifications For Construction, 2000 Edition. Designers must calculate

the service pile load for the critical load case shown in the plan, using the
Standard Plan Note table for piers with piling (see Appendix 2-H).
The critical load case for the pier piling is:
Strength I(a) at Column 2 bottom with = 1.25
Live Load Case 6, and Temp. = -45 F.
First, compute separate factored pile loads due to dead load, live load,
and overturning load for load table:
Factored PDL (includes EV) = 1.25 (684 + 87.8) + 1.35 29.5 = 1004.6 kips
Factored MLLpar
Factored MDLperp = 0 kip ft
1004.6
Factored Max. Pile Load DL =
= 45.7 tons/pile
11 2
Factored Pu (with dynamic load allowance removed)
= 1.75 (3.04 8.5) = 517.1 kips
Factored MLLpar
Factored MLLperp = 0 kip ft
517.1
Factored Max. Pile Load LL =
= 23.5 tons/pile
11 2
Factored POT = 0.50 18 = 9.0 kips
Factored MOTpar
0 kip ft
Factored MOTperp = 1.75 (341) + 169 = 765.8 kip ft

9.0 765.8 5.00 1
Factored Max. Pile LoadOT =
+
= 11.3 tons/pile
175.00 2
11
Factored Max. Pile Loadtotal = 45.7 + 23.5 + 11.3 = 80.5 tons / pile
Next, compute the maximum service pile load using the loads from
Strength I(a) without the load factors. Note that an exception to this is
the temperature load. The 0.50 load factor is retained for service
because it does not seem reasonable to use a larger load factor for
service than that used for strength calculations.
Service Ptotal = 684 + 87.8 + 29.5 + (304 8.5) + (0.50 18) = 1105.8 kips
Service Mtotalpar = 0 kips - ft
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Service M totalperp =
11-138
765.8
= 437.6 kip ft
1.75
1105.8 437.6 5.00 1

Service Max. Pile Loadtotal =
+
= 56.5 tons / pile
175.00 2
11
Now compute average load factor:

80.5
Avg. Load Factor =
= 1.425
56.5
The final results to be shown in the plan are:
PIER
PIER
Factored Dead load
45.7
Factored Live Load
23.5
Factored Overturning
11.3
Factored Total Load
80.5
* Design Load
56.5
80.5
1.425
= 56.5 tons/pile
1.425 is Average Load Factor for Strength I Load

Combination
G. Design
Footing
1. Check Shear Capacity of Footing

Locate Critical Shear and Flexure Sections
Using a column diameter of 3-0 and a footing thickness of 4-6, the
critical sections for shear and flexure for the footing can be found. Begin
by determining the width of an equivalent square column.
A=
D2
= 1018 = b 2
4
b = 31.9 in, say 32 in
The critical section for one-way shear is located a distance dv away from
the face of the equivalent square column. Two-way shear is evaluated on
a perimeter located dv/2 away from the face of the actual round column.
The same dimension dv/2 is used to check two-way shear for a corner
pile.
[5.8.2.9]
Estimate dv as 0.9de. Note that it is not appropriate to use 0.72h here

because the tension reinforcement is located so high above the bottom of
the footing.
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-139
Use an average value for the de calculation, assuming #25 bars in both
directions and that the bars sit directly on top of the piles.
Then d v = 0.9de = 0.9 (54 12 1.0) = 36.9 in
Figure 11.4.3.15
The critical section for flexure is located at the face of the equivalent
square column. All of the critical sections are presented in Figure
11.4.3.15.
Check One-Way Shear
The critical one-way shear section is located 36.9 inches away from the
face of the equivalent square column.
For the portion of the footing that extends parallel to the pier all of the
piles are within the critical shear section and no check is necessary.
For the portion of the footing that extends perpendicular to the pier, the
three outermost piles lie outside of the critical shear section and the sum
reaction must be resisted.
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-140
Vu = 161.3 3 = 483.9 kips
[5.8.3.3]
The one-way shear capacity of the footing is:

Vc = 0.0316 f'c b v dv
Vc = 0.90 0.0316 2 4 (10 12) 36.9 = 503.7 kips > 483.9 kips OK
[5.13.3.6.3]
Check punching shear around the column

Assume the entire column vertical load needs to be carried at the
perimeter. If the footing has inadequate capacity, reduce the demand by
subtracting piles and dead load inside of the perimeter.
The perimeter for two-way shear is:

b o = 2 36.5 = 229.3 in
The aspect ratio of the column (c) is 1.0.
Vn = Vc = 0.126 f'c b o dv = 0.90 0.126 4 229.3 36.9
= 1919 kips > 1531 kips
OK
Check punching shear on a corner pile
The critical shear section is assumed to be 0.5dv away from the outside
edge of the pile. The shear section path with the shortest distance to the
edge of the footing will provide the smallest capacity.
2 24.5
bo =
+ 18 + 18 = 74.5 in
4
Once again using c equal to 1.0, inserting values into LRFD Equation
5.13.3.6.3-1 produces:
Vn = Vc 0.126 f' c b o d v = 0.90 0.126 4 74.5 36.9
= 623.5 > 161.1 kips
OK
[5.7.2.2]
[5.7.3.2]
2. Design Footing Reinforcement Perpendicular to Pier For

Factored Moments
Strength I(a) Load Combination. Five piles contribute to the design
moment at the critical section for moment perpendicular to the pier. The
three outer piles are located 44 away from the critical section.
The two inner piles are located 14 away from the critical section.
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN

Pinner =
1531
11
766 2.50
175.00
11-141
= 150.1 kips/piles
Then the design moment on the critical section is:
Mu = 161.1
44
14
+ 2 150.1 = 2122 kip-ft

12
12
Set up the equation to solve for the required area of steel:

A s fy
Mu = A s f y d
1.7 f 'c b
Mu = 0.90 A s (60) d
0.3309 A s
1.7 4 120 12
A s 60
4.5 d A s + Mu = 0
2
As =
4.5 d 20.25 d 1.3236 Mu

0.6618
To compute d assume that #32 bars are used for both mats of
reinforcement and that they rest directly on top of the cut off piles. In
addition, reduce d to permit either set of bars to rest directly on the
pile.
d = 54 12 1.27
1.27
2
= 40.10 in
2
The required area of steel is 12.02 in . Try 10-#32 bars spaced at 12

2
inches. The provided area of steel is 12.70 in .
[5.7.3.4]
Crack Control
Crack control checks are not performed on footings.
[5.5.3]
Fatigue
By inspection, fatigue is not checked for footings.
[5.7.3.3.1]

A s fy
12.70 60
a=
=
= 1.87 in
0.85 f' c b 0.85 4.0 120
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-142

a
1.87
c=
=
= 2.20 in
1 0.85
c
d
[5.7.3.3.2]
2.20
40.10
OK
= 0.055 < 0.42

1
1
4
3
Ig =
b t3 =
120 (54) = 1,574,640 in
12
12
The distance from the tension face to the centroid is:

yt = 27.0 in
This leads to a cracking moment of:
fr I g
0.48 1,574,640
=
= 2333 kip-ft
Mcr =
yt
27.0 (12)
The minimum required flexural resistance is the lesser of:
GOVERNS
1.2 Mcr = 1.2 2333 = 2800 kip ft
or 1.33Mu = 1.33 2122 = 2822 kip ft
The resisting moment is:
Mr = As fy (d a/2)
=
0.9 (12.70) (60) 40.10
2238 kip-ft < 2800 kip-ft
1.87
2 12
No Good
2
Revise reinforcement to 13-#32 bars spaced at 9 inches (As = 16.51 in )

with standard hooks.
OK
Mr = 2889 kip-ft > 2800 kip-ft
[5.7.2.2]
[5.7.3.2]
3. Design Footing Reinforcement Parallel to Pier For Factored

Moments
Strength I load combination for parallel moments . Four piles contribute
to the design moment at the critical section for moment parallel to the
pier.
Piles 1 and 3 have reaction of 161.1 kips and 117.3 kips respectively.
The inner pile above the Xpar axis was previously shown to have a
reaction equal to 150.1 kips.
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-143
The pile reaction for the inner pile below the Xpar axis is:
P=
[5.13.3.6.1]
1531
11
766 (2.50)
175.00
= 128.2 kips
The inner piles lie partially inside of the critical section. Only the portion
of the reaction outside the critical section causes moment at the critical
section. See Figure 11.4.3.16.
Partial Footing Plan

Figure 11.4.3.16
Then the design moment on the critical section is:
26
11 21
+ (150.1 + 128.2) = 1050 kip-ft
12
12 12
Mu = (161.1 + 117.3)
Using the same d value of 40.10 inches as used for the perpendicular
2
reinforcement, the required area of steel is 5.87 in . Try 13-#22 bars
2
spaced at 12 inches. The provided area of steel is 7.80 in .
[5.7.3.4]
Crack Control
Crack control checks are not performed on footings.
[5.5.3]
Fatigue
By inspection, fatigue is not checked for footings.
[5.7.3.3.1]

A s fy
7.80 60
a=
=
= 0.88 in
0.85 f' c b 0.85 4.0 156
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-144

a
0.88
c=
=
= 1.04 in
1 0.85
Compute revised d for #22 bars:
0.875
d = 54 12 1.27
= 40.29 in
2
c
1.04
=
= 0.026 < 0.42
d 40.29
[5.7.3.3.2]
OK

Revise 1.2 Mcr computed earlier for footing length of 13 feet:
1.2Mcr = 2800
13
10
= 3640 kip ft
The minimum required flexural resistance is the lesser of 1.2Mcr or:

1.33Mu = 1.33 1050 = 1397 kip-ft
GOVERNS
The resisting moment is:

Mr = As fy (d a/2)
=
0.9 (7.80) (60) 40.29
0.88
2 12
1399 kip-ft > 1397 kip-ft
OK
2
Provide 13-#22 bars spaced at 12 inches (As = 7.80 in ) with standard

hooks.
4. Dowel Bar Development and Lap Splice

Determine the lap length for the primary column steel to dowel splice.
All primary column steel bars are spliced at the same location,
consequently the lap is a Class C splice.
The primary column
reinforcement consists of #25 epoxy coated bars.
For ease of
construction, the dowel circle will be detailed to the inside of the column
bar circle. Accordingly, the dowels will be increased one size to #29
bars.
[5.11.2.1.1]
The basic development length l db for a #29 bar is the greater of:
1.25 A b fy 1.25 1.00 60
l db =
=
= 37.50 in
GOVERNS
f' c
4
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
11-145
or
l db = 0.4 db fy = 0.4 1.128 60 = 27.07 in

Development length modificationmfactors are:
1.5 for epoxy coated bars with concrete cover less than 3 bar
diameters.
0.8 for bars spaced 6 inches and side clear cover 3 inches.
0.75 for bars within a spiral with diameter 0.25 inches and pitch
4 inches.
The development length l d of the bars is:
l d = 37.50 1.5 0.8 0.75 = 33.75 in
[5.11.5.3.1]
The lap length for a Class C tension splice is:

1.7 l d = 1.7 33.75 = 57.38 in
Specify a 4-10 lap length.
Dowel Bar Hook Development
Verify that adequate embedment is provided for the dowel bars in the
footing.
[5.11.2.4.1]
The basic development length l hb for a #29 epoxy coated bar with a
standard hook is:
38.0 db 38.0 1.128
l hb =
=
= 21.43 in
f' c
4
Development length modification factors are:
0.7 side cover 2.5 inches and hook extension cover 2.0
inches.
1.2 for epoxy coated bars.
The development length l
dh
of the dowel with standard hook is:
l dh = 21.43 0.7 1.2 = 18.00 in

The embedment provided is:
l prov = 54 12 1.27 0.875 = 39.86 in > 18.00 in
OK
JANUARY 2004
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN

5. Summary
The footing reinforcement is illustrated in Figure 11.4.3.17.
Figure 11.4.3.17
11-146
OCTOBER 2003
12. BURIED
STRUCTURES
[12.6.6]
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
12-1
Buried structures serve a variety of purposes. They are typically used for
conveying water. At other times they are used to provide a grade
separated crossing for pedestrian and bicycle traffic.
A variety of
structure and material types are used. The most prevalent types are
pipes and box culverts.
Pipes and culverts with lateral horizontal
dimensions less than 10'-0" are not classified as bridges. Typically these
smaller buried structures do not require extensive design and are simply
selected from standard design tables. Buried structures with lateral
horizontal dimensions greater than or equal to 10'-0" are considered
bridges and require a plan be prepared by the Bridge Office. Figure
12.2.1 contains a typical design request from a District.
In addition to pipes and box culverts, precast concrete arches and longspan corrugated steel structures are used as buried structures. The loads
that are applied to a buried structure vary with the site (trench or
embankment condition). A buried structure constructed in a trench
condition will carry less vertical load than a structure constructed in an
embankment condition. The sidewalls of the trench are assumed to carry
a portion of the vertical load. In most cases, buried bridge structure
designs should be based on embankment conditions.
The means by which a buried structure carries vertical load varies
significantly between different structure types. Box culverts and rigid
pipes are assumed to carry the design loads internally. Flexible pipe and
corrugated steel structures are assumed to carry loads with soil-structure
interaction. Careful backfilling and compaction procedures are required
for flexible structures to ensure that the assumed soil-structure capacity
is provided and that settlements are not excessive.
Mn/DOT is currently developing guidelines for the design and use of
three-sided culverts. Information will be made available in the near
future.
12.1 Geotechnical
Properties
Typically, one or more soil borings will be obtained during the preliminary
design process. Foundation recommendations based on field data and
the hydraulic requirements will also be assembled during the preliminary
design process. Mn/DOT Spec 2451 describes the excavation, foundation
preparation, and backfill requirements for bridges and miscellaneous
structures.
Maximum and minimum load factors for different load components should
be combined to produce the largest load effects. The presence or
OCTOBER 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
12-2
absence of water in the culvert should also be considered when

assembling load combinations.
12.2 Box Culverts
Where pipe solutions are inappropriate, box culverts are the default
buried structure type. Their larger openings are often required to provide
adequate hydraulic capacity.
The reinforcement used in concrete box culverts can be either
conventional bar reinforcement or welded wire fabric. Welded wire fabric
has a yield strength slightly larger than conventional bar reinforcement
(65 ksi versus 60 ksi).
12.2.1 Precast
Standard designs for precast concrete box culverts are available with
openings varying from 6 to 14 feet wide by 4 by 14 feet high. The
designs utilize concrete strengths between 5 and 6 ksi and are suitable
for fill heights ranging from less than 2'-0" to a maximum of 25'-0".
Each culvert size has three or four classes. Each class has specified wall
and slab thicknesses, reinforcement areas, concrete strength, and fill
height range to which it applies. Fill heights extend from 0 to 25 feet.
Shop drawing submittals for Mn/DOT approval will not be required when
standard culvert sections are used.
The standard design tables are based on welded wire fabric reinforcement
1
with a yield strength of 65 ksi and a concrete clear cover between 1 /2
and 2". If conventional rebar is used, the steel area required needs to be
increased 8% to account for the difference in steel yield strength (65
ksi/60 ksi). Also, crack control must be rechecked for the specific bar
size and spacing used.
To prevent corrosion at the ends of welded wire fabric, nylon boots are
required on the ends of every fourth longitudinal wire at the bottom of
the form. The maximum thickness of welded wire fabric is 0.5 inch per
layer. A maximum of two layers of welded wire fabric can be used for
primary reinforcement. If two layers are used, the layers need to be
oriented such that the longitudinal and transverse wires always alternate.
The minimum amount of longitudinal reinforcement (parallel to the axis
2
of the culvert) is 0.06 in /ft.
OCTOBER 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
12-3
Memo
Transportation District 8
2505 Transportation Rd.
P.O. Box 768
Willmar, MN 56201
Office Tel: 320-231-5195

Fax No: 320-231-5168
[ date ]
To:
Kevin L. Western
Bridge Design Engineer, M.S. 610
From:
Paul Rasmussen
Design/Hydraulics Engineer
Phone:
320-214-3708
Subject:
S.P. 6420-20 (T.H. 19)
Please prepare a design for concrete box culvert. Tabulated below and attached is the
information required to prepare plans. The letting date for this project is 11/17/00. Please
submit completed plans to this office before 07/01/00.
State Project No. 6403-30
Location Description
(1)
Func. 2 Work Authority: T80057
: T.H. 19 over JD #33, 11.3 Mi. West of Redwood Falls
Reference: 59+00.83
Section: 1
Station: 342+91.07
Range: 38W
Township: 112N
Stream Crossing: Judicial Ditch #33
Township Name: Vesta
County: Redwood
Structure Type: Concrete Box Culvert Replacement

New Structure Number: 64X07
Number of Barrels:
1
Depth of Cover
(2)
Existing Structure Number:
Opening Width:
10 ft.
: 6.8 ft.
Opening Height: Spa btwn Precast Barrels:

8 ft.
NA
Skew Angle: 0
End Sections: Square
Inlet Elevation (new structure): 1037.34
Outlet Elevation (new structure): 1036.60
Inlet Elevation (inplace structure): 1037.34
Outlet Elevation (inplace structure): 1036.60
Extension Distances from end of inplace: NA

Plans Requested: Precast
(1)
T.H. over _____, ___ Mi. ___ of Jct. T.H. _____ & T.H. _____, ___ of ___. (modify as necessary)
(2)
Minimum fill over culvert rounded up to the next tenth meter.
Attachments: Sketch of Cross Section

Sketch of Plan View
Cc:
David Dahlberg
Bruce Iwen
Figure 12.2.1
OCTOBER 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
12-4
Aprons
Precast apron segments are provided for each size of barrel. There are
four different details relating the culverts skew to the roadway above.
Culvert Skew Range
0 to 7 /2
1
1
7 /2 to 22 /2
1
1
22 /2 to 37 /2
1
37 /2 to 45
Apron Skew
0
15
30
45
A lateral soil pressure of 0.060 ksf should be used for the aprons.
The 45 skew aprons should be designed with a 0.075 ksf pressure on
the longer length wall. Mn/DOT also requires on 45 skew aprons over
6'-0" high, additional extra strong ties between the barrel and first end
section, and between the first and second end sections. Additional ties
are required to resist unequal pressures on opposite sides of the skewed
apron.
12.2.2 Cast-InPlace
The first box culverts constructed in Minnesota were cast-in-place. The

performance of these structures over the years has been very good.
Currently, most box culvert installations are precast due to the time
required for plan production and construction. Cast-in-place culverts
continue to be an allowable option.
12.3 Design
Guidance
The standard designs are also based on a minimum equivalent fluid

pressure of 0.030 kcf and on a maximum equivalent fluid pressure of
0.060 kcf.
Box culverts with fill heights less than 2'-0" are constructed with a
distribution slab. No structural benefit from the distribution slab is
considered during design.
Dead Loads
The Fe factor is used to adjust the vertical earth load carried by the
culvert. It is intended to approximate soil-structure interaction effects
and installation conditions (trench versus embankment).
Compacted fill on top of buried structures is assumed to have a unit
weight of 0.130 kcf.
Concrete self-weight computations should be based on 0.150 kcf.
OCTOBER 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
12-5
Water loads should be based on 0.062 kcf.

Live Load
The application of live loads is similar to the Standard Specifications. For
fill heights less than 2'-0" a loading similar to that applied to a concrete
slab bridge is used. For fill depths 2'-0" or greater the live load wheel
pressure spreads with an increase in fill height. The assumed tire contact
area for each wheel has a width of 20" and a length of 10". The load is
assumed to spread laterally 0.57 feet in both directions for every foot of
fill above the culvert. The intensity of live loads at any depth is assumed
to be uniform over the entire footprint. Wheel loads are assumed to
distribute both longitudinally and transversely. Lane loads are assumed
to be very long and consequently only distribute transversely.
The dynamic load allowance (IM) for culverts and other buried structures
is reduced based on the depth of fill over the culvert. LRFD designs
require that impact (dynamic load allowance) be considered for fill
heights of up to 8'-0".
In determining the live load for structural analysis, use the multiple
presence factors. One lane loaded for strength and service limit states
has a multiple presence factor of 1.20. For two lanes loaded, use 1.00.
No multiple presence factor is used for the fatigue limit state. A single
HL-93 truck axle is used for the fatigue check.
The approximate strip method is used for the design with the 1'-0" wide
design strip oriented parallel to the direction of traffic (longitudinal
direction.) The design live loads include the HL-93 truck, lane and
tandem loads. For both the strength and service limit states, consider
the following three load cases:
1. Maximum vertical load on the roof and maximum outward load on the
walls: DCmax + EVmax + EHmin+(LL+IM)max + WAmax
2. Minimum vertical load on the roof and maximum inward load on the
walls: DCmin + EVmin + EHmax
3. Maximum vertical load on the roof and maximum inward load on the
walls: DCmax + EVmax + EHmax + (LL + IM)max
Reactions to vertical loads applied to the culvert (earth, water, live load)
are assumed to be carried with uniformly distributed reactions applied to
the bottom of the bottom slab. Box culverts supported on stiff or rigid
subgrades (rock) require additional investigation.
OCTOBER 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
12-6
Include fillets in the analysis by increasing the thickness of the members

near each corner. Use the moment at the location where the typical
section and fillet meet to determine corner reinforcement requirements.
Use the shear at d/2 away from the intersection of the typical section and
fillet to determine shear adequacy.
The minimum amount of flexural reinforcement in the cross section is
0.2% of the gross area.
12.4 Arch or
3-Sided Structure
Design Data
Designs based on the AASHTO Standard Specifications have been

assembled for buried precast concrete arch structures. See Standard
Detail 5-397.786.
When fill depths are between table values, use the largest steel area on
either side of the design fill height.
The minimum fill is 1'-6" at the low edge of pavement at the crown of the
arch.
Figures 12.4.1 and 12.4.2 contain standard design information for spans
between 24'-0" and 43'-11". For projects with fill heights greater than
those listed a custom design is required.
Guidelines for Scour Protection of Arch or 3-Sided Bridge Footings
The following guidelines are provided for the design and installation of
scour protection for arch or 3-sided bridge footings.
There are several options available for protection of the footings against
scour.
These options include rock riprap, concrete bottom, piling
supported footings, and spread footings keyed into bedrock.
The
preferred option choice will depend on a number of factors including:
Foundation design
Stream bed material
Scour potential
Velocity of flow
Environmental considerations such as fish migration
Economics
OCTOBER 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 12.4.1
12-7
OCTOBER 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 12.4.2
12-8
OCTOBER 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
12-9
The foundation design will depend on the type and allowable bearing
capacity of the soil, the height of fill, and the proximity of bedrock. Scour
should be considered during foundation design. Subcut unstable material
below spread footings and replace it with granular backfill or a lean
concrete. The maximum depth of subcutting for this purpose is 2'-0". A
pile footing should be used if the depth of unstable material below a
footing is greater than 2'-0".
Four standard designs for scour protection for concrete arch structures
have been assembled. The appropriate design is selected based on the
average velocity through the structure for the 100-year flood. A more
recurrent flood event should be used if it results in a faster average
velocity through the structure.
Design 1 Scour Protection
The average velocity for the 100 year flood must be no greater than
three feet per second, and for the 500-year flood no greater than five
feet per second. Use of 12" Class II riprap with 6" granular filter or
geotextile filter is required.
Option 1 (Figure 12.4.3, left side)
The riprap may be placed on a slope of 1:2.5 maximum. Cover to the
bottom of footing shall be 6'-0" minimum measured perpendicular to the
slope. The riprap shall be toed in vertically 2'-0" minimum. The bottom
of footing shall be at or below the channel bottom.
Option 2 (Figure 12.4.3, right side)
The riprap may be placed horizontally on the channel bottom. Cover to
the bottom of footing shall be 4'-6" minimum. The riprap shall extend a
minimum of 10'-0" from edge of structure and be toed in vertically a
minimum of 2'-0".
Design 2A Scour Protection
The average velocity for the 100-year flood must be less than 5.5 feet
per second, and for the 500-year flood less than 6.5 feet per second.
Use of 24" Class IV riprap with 12" granular filter or geotextile filter is
required.
Option 1 (Figure 12.4.4, upper left side)
The riprap may be placed on a slope of 1:2.5 maximum. It shall extend
across the entire width of the structure. Cover to the bottom of the
footing shall be 6'-0" minimum measured perpendicular to the slope. The
bottom of footing shall be 2'-0" minimum below the channel bottom.
OCTOBER 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
12-10
Option 2 (Figure 12.4.4, upper right side)

The riprap may be placed horizontally on the channel bottom. Cover to
the bottom of footing shall be 6'-0" minimum. The riprap shall extend a
minimum of 10'-0" from edge of footing and be toed in vertically a
minimum of 2'-0".
Design 2B Scour Protection (Figure 12.4.4, lower right side)
The average velocity for the 100-year flood must be no greater than 5.5
feet per second. The average velocity for the 500-year flood must be no
greater than 6.5 feet per second. The area for calculating the average
velocity of the 100-year flood shall be Area , A which is bounded by the
channel bottom and the water surface. The area for calculating the 500year flood shall be Area A plus Area B, where Area B is bounded by
the channel bottom and the 500-year flood scoured channel bottom. The
toe of riprap shall extend 2' min. beyond the bottom of Area B. This
toe shall have a minimum thickness of 24". Cover to the bottom of
footing shall be 6'-0" minimum measured perpendicular to the slope. The
bottom of footing shall also be at or below the bottom of Area B.
Articulated concrete with geotextile backing may be placed on a
maximum slope of 1:2.5 with a minimum cover of 4'-6" to bottom of
footing measured perpendicular to the articulated concrete. The average
velocity for the 100-year flood must be no greater than 7.5 feet per
second. For higher velocities, contact the Bridge Office.
A reinforced concrete floor placed horizontally only with 4'-6" minimum
cover to bottom of footing may be used. The same velocity constraints
as for Option 1 apply.
If footings are on piling, riprap shall be placed on a slope of 1:2.5
maximum. The bottom of footing shall be at or below the channel
bottom.
If footings are on hard bedrock, they shall be keyed in a minimum of 12".
These guidelines are anticipated to cover most cases, however, there
may be factors such as high natural channel velocity, dense hardpan
channel bottom, historical evidence of no scour on the inplace structure
OCTOBER 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
12-11
or other pertinent data that can be considered when designing scour

protection for the concrete arch structures.
Exceptions to these
guidelines must be approved by the Hydraulics Engineer.
Figure 12.4.3
OCTOBER 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 12.4.4
12-12
OCTOBER 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 12.4.5
Figure 12.4.6
12-13
OCTOBER 2003
12.5 Design
Criteria for LongSpan Corrugated
Steel Structures
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
12-14
Standard designs for long span corrugated steel structures have been
assembled. The standard designs are based on the AASHTO Standard
Specifications and additional criteria specified by Mn/DOT. The following
criteria shall be used for the design of long span corrugated steel
structures, identified as horizontal ellipse, low profile arch and high
profile arch.
Section 12 of the 17th Edition of the AASHTO Standard Specifications for
Highway Bridges should be modified as follows:
1. Delete the values of I. Top Arc of Table 12.7.2A and substitute the
following:
. TOP ARC GAGE-MINIMUM THICKNESS
IN INCHES
MAXIMUM TOP
(6X2) CORRUGATED STEEL PLATES

10
RADIUS IN FEET
0.138
15
0.168
17
0.188
18
0.218
20
0.249
23
0.280
24
The minimum steel thickness to be used is 10 gage

2. Delete values of II. Minimum cover in feet of Table 12.7.2A and add
the following:
GAGE- STEEL THICKNESS
(IN)
TOP RADIUS (FT)

11
13
15
17
18
20
23
10
0.138
3.0
3.0
3.0
0.168
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
0.188
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
0.218
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
0.249
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
4.0
0.280
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
4.0
24
4.0
Minimum cover is defined as the cover from the top of subgrade

section at the shoulder P.I to the top of the structure.
3. Delete III Geometric Limits of Table 12.7.2A and substitute the
following:
a. Maximum Plate Radius 24'-0"
b. Maximum Central Angle of Top Arc = 80
c. Minimum Ratio, Top Radius to Side Radius = 2.0
OCTOBER 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
12-15
d. Maximum Ratio, Top Radius to Side Radius:

For structures without concrete floors 3.5
For structures with concrete floors
3.0
NOTE: On high profile arch structures, the upper side radius equals
the side radius.
e. Maximum ratio of span to top rise for low profile arches = 3.2
1
f. Maximum ratio of span to /2 the top rise for horizontal ellipses =
3.2
4. Revise the following factors in Section 12 for maximum depths of
cover as follows:
k = .22, soil stiffness coefficient for good side fill material
E' = Modulus of Passive soil (side fill) resistance: 1400 psi
Safety factors used: Longitudinal test seam strength = 3.33
Long span structures shall be designed in accordance with the following
additional criteria:
1. Maximum spans for long span corrugated steel structures shall not
exceed 20'-0" with a minimum of 8'-0" between units.
2. Low profile arch and high profile arch structures must have concrete
floors or equivalent, to prevent footing scour, unless footings are
placed on bedrock.
3. At each structure site the following soils information and durability
investigation are required:
a. Soils survey, design, and engineering report shall be made in
accordance with 2-8.02 of the Mn/DOT Road Design Manual.
b. Durability investigation and recommendations shall be made in
accordance with 5-294.343K of the Mn/DOT Drainage Manual.
c. Copies of soils survey and durability investigation, etc. shall be
furnished to the Hydraulic Unit.
Long span corrugated steel structure designs shall be based on:
1. Concrete footings of low profile arch and high profile arch structures
are designed on the basis of 4 tons per square foot allowable soil
stress and fill heights of approximately 30'-0" fill heights above the
top of the structure. Modification of the footing widths for lesser fill
heights or poorer soil conditions is necessary. The minimum footing
width is 1'-6".
2. The maximum height of fill above structures is 30'-0" unless specially
designed by the Bridge Office.
OCTOBER 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
12-16
Additional requirements on long span corrugated steel structures

includes:
1. These structures are not be permitted to be used as vehicle
underpasses.
2. All designs utilizing Federal, State, or State Aid funds will be reviewed
by Mn/DOT.
The review will verify compliance with AASHTO
Specifications, Mn/DOT Specifications, Mn/DOT detail sheets, and
Mn/DOT design guidelines.
3. Standard Plan Sheets developed by Mn/DOT indicate the span, rise,
invert elevation, profile grade over, and hydraulic characteristics of
the structure.
4. These structures are considered arch bridges that depend structurally
on the interaction of the structural plate liner and good quality soil,
which is carefully compacted. Balanced placement of backfill and
close field supervision of backfilling operations is required.
5. Detail plans that include structural computations and special
provisions, shall be certified by a qualified professional engineer
registered in the State of Minnesota.
6. Mn/DOT Projects
a. When the Department of Transportation proposes the use of these
structures, the Bridges and Structures Office will determine the
shape, invert elevation roadway and hydraulic data and complete
a design plan with special provisions to be forwarded to the
District Engineer.
b. A copy of the design plan and special provisions shall be
forwarded to the Bridge Standards Engineer.
7. State Aid Projects
a. For State Aid approval of a long span corrugated steel structure,
the county or municipal engineer shall submit 3 copies of an
engineering report on the structures hydraulic characteristics,
special provisions, a design detail plan and funding request forms
to the Mn/DOT State Aid Office.
b. Final funding approval by the State Aid Office to include approval
of the design detail plan and hydraulic characteristics by the Office
of Bridges and Structures.
8. Scour protection for long span corrugated steel structures shall be the
same as those for precast concrete arch structures (see Section
12.4).
OCTOBER 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
12-17
The geometry of standard low profile arches with compaction wings is

provided in the following table.
TOP
SIDE
RADIUS
RADIUS
(RT)
(RS)
5'-9"
8'-6"
3'-7"
15 37'
2'-4"
5'-2"
6'-2"
10'-3"
3'-7"
15 37'
16'-11"
5'-5"
6'-5"
11'-5"
3'-7"
16'-11"
6'-0"
7'-0"
10'-10"
4'-6"
MAX
BOTTOM
TOP
TOTAL
SPAN
SPAN
RISE
RISE
13'-6"
13'-3"
4'-9"
15'-9"
15'-2"
17'-2"
17'-2"
ANGLE
STEP
BELOW
APPROX.
HORIZ.
(3)
SLOPE
APPROX.
COLLAR
AREA
LENGTH
(SQ. FT.)
5'-6"
9'-11"
63
2'-7"
6'-7"
10'-10"
78
15 37'
2'-10"
7'-4"
11'-4"
88
12 29'
2'-8"
7'-0"
12'-8"
96
NOTES:
1. The Foundation Engineer will determine the suitability of the
foundation material under the structure, and will provide
recommendations relative to subcutting as required.
2. The side excavation limits may be increased as recommended by the
Foundation Engineer.
3. See Bridge Detail Standard Plan Sheet 5-397.744 (Side Elevation) for
step location.
4. Footing width at collar to be 4'-9", see 5-397.744 for footing sizes.
OCTOBER 2003
12.6 10'x10'
Precast Concrete
Box Culvert Design
Example
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
12-18
This example illustrates the design of a single barrel precast concrete box
culvert. After determining individual load components and assembling
the design load combinations, the design of the flexural reinforcement is
presented. The design example concludes with a shear check and an
axial load capacity check
The inside dimensions of the box culvert are 10'-0" by 10'-0". The fill
height above the culvert is 6'-0". A typical section of the culvert is shown
in Figure 12.8.1.
A. Earth Pressure
Loads
[3.11.5 3.11.7,
12.11.2]
Weights
Reinforcement
Steel
Concrete
Unit
The following material and design parameters are used for this example:
3
Reinforced Concrete
0.150 k/ft
Water
0.062 k/ft
Soil (computed)
0.130 k/ft
Compressive Strength, fc
5.0 ksi
Top Slab Thickness
9 in
Bottom Slab Thickness
10 in
Wall Thickness
8 in
Concrete Cover
1.5 in
Crack Control, Z
130 kip/in
29,000 ksi
Yield Strength, fy
65 ksi
Maximum Wire Size
W20
Minimum Wire Spacing
2 in
Maximum Wire Spacing
3
3
4 in (transv. wires)
8 in (longit. Wires)
The weight of fill on top of the culvert produces vertical earth pressure
(EV). To account for the variability of the fill on top of box culverts a unit
weight of 0.130 kcf is used.
Vertical earth pressures are modified to account for soil structure
interaction. The interaction or the amount of earth load carried by the
culvert is dependent on the construction site and the methods used
during construction. Culverts placed in trench conditions need to carry
less vertical load than those constructed in embankment conditions (the
consolidated material in the adjacent trench walls is typically stiffer than
new embankment material.). The design example assumes the box
culvert will be constructed with embankment conditions.
OCTOBER 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 12.6.1 - Design Example Geometry
12-19
OCTOBER 2003
[12.11.2.2.1-2]
[12.11.2.2.1-1]
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
12-20
The interaction factor is dependent on the height of fill (H) and the
outside width of the culvert (Bc):
H
6
Fe = 1 + 0.20 = 1 + 0.20
= 1.11 1.15
0.67 + 10.0 + 0.67
B c
The design vertical earth pressure at the top of the culvert is:
EV = WE = Fe DE = 1.11 0.130 6.0 = 0.866 ksf
The lateral earth pressure (EH) on the culvert is found using the
equivalent fluid method. An at-rest, maximum equivalent-fluid unit
weight of 0.060 kcf is used.
At the top of the culvert, the lateral earth pressure is:
EH = eq Z = 0.060 6.0 = 0.36 ksf
At the bottom of the culvert, the lateral earth pressure is:
9
10
EH = 0.060 6.0 +
+ 10.0 +
= 1.05 ksf
12
12
Figure 12.8.2 illustrates the vertical and lateral earth pressures applied to
the box culvert.
Figure 12.6.2 Earth Loads and Selfweight Reaction
OCTOBER 2003
B. Water Load
[3.7.1]
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
12-21
Designers need to consider load cases where the culvert is full of water
as well as cases where the culvert is empty. A simple hydrostatic
distribution is used for the water load:
At the inside top of the culvert, the lateral water pressure is:
WAtop = 0 .00 ksf
At the inside bottom of the culvert, the lateral water pressure is:
WAbot = z = 0.062 10 = 0.62 ksf
The vertical pressure of 0.62 ksf applied to the bottom of the culvert from
water is assumed to pass directly through the bottom slab into the
subgrade. The water load is illustrated in Figure 12.8.3.
Figure 12.6.3 Water Loads
C. Live Load
[3.6.1.3.3]
The approximate strip method is used for the design with the 1'-0" wide
design strip oriented parallel to the direction of traffic (longitudinal
direction.) The design live loads include the HL-93 truck, lane and
tandem loads.
[3.6.2.2]
Dynamic Load Allowance

The dynamic load allowance (IM) for culverts and other buried structures
is reduced based on the depth of fill over the culvert. The deeper the fill,
the greater the reduction. For strength and service limit states:
IM = 33 [1.0 0.125 DE ] = 33 [1.0 0.125 6.0] = 8.3%
OCTOBER 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
12-22
For the fatigue check:
IM = 15 [1.0 0.125 DE ] = 15 [1.0 0.125 6.0] = 3.8%
[3.6.1.2.5]
[3.6.1.2.6]
Live Load Distribution

Live loads are assumed to distribute laterally with depth.
The
specifications permit designers to increase the footprint of the load with
increasing depth of fill. The load is assumed to spread laterally 0.57 feet
in each direction for every foot of fill above the culvert. The intensity of
live loads at any depth is assumed to be uniform over the entire
footprint.
[3.6.1.2.5]
The assumed tire contact area for each wheel has a width of 20" and a
length of 10".
Using the distances between wheel lines, axles, and design lanes, the live
load intensities at the top of the box culvert can be found. For truck and
tandem loadings the influence area or footprint of the live load is found
first. After which, the sum of the weights of the wheels is used to
determine the intensity of the live load. The lane loading is treated
slightly differently from the wheel loads. Wheel loads are assumed to
distribute both longitudinally and transversely. Lane loads are assumed
to be very long and consequently only distribute transversely.
To determine the live load that should be carried into the structural
analysis, use multiple presence factors. One lane loaded for strength and
service limit states uses a multiple presence factor of 1.20. For two lanes
loaded use 1.00. No multiple presence factor should be used for the
fatigue limit state.
Begin by determining
components.
the
intensities
of
the
different
live
A single HL93 truck axle produces a live load pressure of:

2 PW MPF
2 16 1.2
wLL =
= 0.339 ksf
=
(influence area) 14.58 7.75
Two HL93 truck axles adjacent to each other (4' apart) produce:
4 PW MPF
4 16 1.0
wLL =
= 0.336 ksf
=
A single lane load produces:
wLL =
lane
width MPF
(influence width)
0.064 10 1.20
16.9
= 0.045 ksf
load
OCTOBER 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
12-23
A single tandem vehicle produces:

wLL =
4 Pw MPF
(influence area)
4 12.5 1.20
14.58 11.75
= 0.350 ksf
Two tandem vehicles adjacent to each other (4' apart) produce:

8 Pw MPF
8 12.5 1.0
wLL =
=
= 0.346 ksf
Figure 12.6.4 illustrates the different live loads.
The tandem vehicle produces a live load intensity slightly larger than that
of the HL-93 truck axle and also larger than the double tandem load. It
also has a larger influence area than the truck axle. Use lane loading and
the single tandem to design for the Strength and Service limit states. A
single HL-93 truck axle is used for the fatigue check.
D. Select
Applicable Load
Combinations and
Load Factors
[3.4.1]
The load factors for the different load components vary with the limit
state being considered. For this example the following load factors are
used:
Strength
Service
Fatigue
Min.
Max.
Min.
Max.
Min.
Max.
DC
0.9
1.25
1.0
1.0
----
----
EV
0.9
1.3
1.0
1.0
----
----
EH
0.65
1.35
0.5
1.0
----
----
LL
1.75
1.75
1.0
1.0
0.75
0.75
WA
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
----
----
For both the strength and service limit states, three load cases will be
considered. The load cases correspond to:
1. Maximum vertical load on the roof and maximum outward load on the
walls: DCmax + EVmax + EHmin + (LL+IM)max + WAmax
2. Minimum vertical load on the roof and maximum inward load on the
walls: DCmin + EVmin + EHmax
3. Maximum vertical load on the roof and maximum inward load on the
walls: DCmax + EVmax + EHmax + (LL+IM)max
OCTOBER 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 12.6.4 - Live Load Distribution
12-24
OCTOBER 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 12.6.4 - Live Load Distribution (cont.)
The Strength I load combinations are:

1. U = 1.0 [1.25 DC + 1.3 EV + 0.65 EH + 1.75 (LL + IM) + 1.0 WA ]
2. U = 1.0 [0.9 DC + 0.9 EV + 1.35 EH]
3. U = 1.0 [1.25 DC + 1.3 EV + 1.35 EH + 1.75 (LL + IM)]
The Service I load combinations are:
1. U = 1.0 [DC + EV + 0.5 EH + (LL + IM) + WA ]
2. U = 1.0 [DC + EV + EH]
3. U = 1.0 [DC + EV + EH + (LL + IM)]
One load case is considered for the Fatigue limit state:
1. U = 0.75 (LL + IM) (range)
12-25
OCTOBER 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
E. Summary of
Analysis Results
12-26
A structural analysis was performed using a standard commercial matrixanalysis program. The bottom slab of the box culvert was assumed rigid
compared to the subgrade. Reactions to vertical loads applied to the
culvert (earth, water, live load) were assumed to be carried with
uniformly distributed reactions applied to the bottom slab. Box culverts
supported on stiff or rigid subgrades (rock) would require additional
investigation. The fillets were included in the analysis by increasing the
thickness of members near each corner. The internal forces at several
locations of the box are presented in Tables 12.8.1 and 12.8.2. The
forces presented at top, bottom, or end locations are at the location
where the typical section and fillet meet. The first table lists the forces
associated with each load component. The second table contains the
forces at the same locations for the various load combinations.
Table 12.6.1a Structural Analysis Results (unfactored, kip-in)
WA
Fatigue
EH
(range)
EV
LL+IM
DC
Tandem
Moment
Sidewall Bottom
-20.0
-36.9
-4.74
-0.06
-16.17
-8.47
Sidewall Center
-12.2
-42.9
63.1
-27.7
-18.78
-11.84
Sidewall Top
-4.36
-48.8
-4.57
4.54
-21.39
-15.22
Top Slab Center
-18.3
-96.9
50.8
-20.8
-42.43
-29.19
Top Slab End
-7.52
-13.8
50.8
-20.8
-6.03
-1.85
Bottom Slab Center
43.4
113
-69.9
32.4
49.49
29.18
Bottom Slab End
5.73
29.8
-69.9
32.4
13.07
8.68
Table 12.6.1b Structural Analysis Results (unfactored, kip)
EH
WA
DC
EV
EH
WA
LL+IM
EV
Tandem
DC
LL+IM
Thrust
Tandem
Shear
Sidewall Bottom
0.16
-0.12
3.14
-1.35
-0.05
1.74
4.62
0.00
0.00
2.03
Sidewall Center
0.16
-0.12
-0.16
0.21
-0.05
1.34
4.62
0.00
0.00
2.03
Sidewall Top
0.16
-0.12
-2.50
0.96
-0.05
0.94
4.62
0.00
0.00
2.03
Top Slab Center
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
-0.16
0.12
3.08
-0.99
0.05
Top Slab End
-0.45
-3.46
0.00
0.00
-1.52
-0.16
0.12
3.08
-0.99
0.05
Bottom Slab Center
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.16
-0.12
4.54
-2.13
-0.05
Bottom Slab End
-1.57
-3.46
0.00
0.00
-1.52
0.16
-0.12
4.54
-2.13
-0.05
OCTOBER 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
12-27
Table 12.6.1.2a Strength and Fatigue Load Combinations (kips, kip-in)
Moment
Shear
Thrust
Moment
Shear
Thrust
Moment
Fatigue
Thrust
Case 3
Shear
Case 2
Moment
Case 1
Sidewall Bottom
-108
0.45
12.1
-57.6
4.28
5.72
-111
4.18
12.1
-6.35
Sidewall Center
-94.5
0.05
11.6
35.6
-0.18
5.36
-22.6
-0.28
11.6
-8.88
Sidewall Top
-109
-0.73
11.1
-54.1
-3.34
5.00
-117
-3.44
11.1
-11.4
Top Slab Center
-220
0.00
1.07
-35.1
0.00
4.13
-163
0.00
4.23
-21.9
Top Slab End
-26.9
-8.04
1.07
49.4
-3.52
4.13
29.5
-8.04
4.23
-1.39
Bottom Slab Center
285
0.00
0.76
46.3
0.00
6.17
204
0.00
6.07
21.9
Bottom Slab End
58.6
-9.44
0.76
-62.4
-4.53
6.17
-22.8
-9.44
6.07
6.51
Table 12.6.1.2b Service Load Combinations (kips, kip-in)
Thrust
Moment
Shear
Thrust
Moment
Shear
Thrust
Case 3
Shear
Case 2
Moment
Case 1
Sidewall Bottom
-77.5
0.02
8.62
-61.7
3.18
6.36
-79.8
3.12
8.62
Sidewall Center
-72.3
0.11
8.22
8.03
-0.12
5.96
-13.0
-0.17
7.85
Sidewall Top
-74.9
-0.31
7.82
-57.8
-2.46
5.56
-81.7
-2.52
7.82
Top Slab Center
-158
0.00
0.57
-64.4
0.00
3.04
-112
0.00
3.11
Top Slab End
-23.5
-5.61
0.57
29.5
-3.91
3.04
22.8
-5.61
3.11
Bottom Slab Center
209
0.00
0.12
86.4
0.00
4.58
142
0.00
4.52
Bottom Slab End
47.7
-6.73
0.12
-34.4
-5.03
4.58
-19.7
-6.73
4.52
The values in Tables 12.8.1 and 12.8.2 include dynamic load allowance
and multiple presence factors.
F. Investigate
Strength Limit
State for Flexure
[5.7.2.2]
[5.7.3.2]

Strength I load combinations.
a
Mu = Mn = A s f y d
2

A s fy
a=
0.85 f 'c b
OCTOBER 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
12-28
Substituting for a in the first equation:

A s fy
Mu = Mn = A s f y d
2 0.85 f 'c b
Inserting values for fy, b, and :

A s 65
Mu = 1.0 A s 65 d
0
.
85
5
.
0
12
.
0
Which becomes:
Mu = 65 A s [d 0.637 A s ]
And eventually:
2
41.41 A s 65 d A s + Mu = 0
Solving the quadratic equation for As:
2
As =
(65 d) 4225 d 165.6 Mu

82.82
Sidewall:
Size the reinforcement assuming d dimensions based on a W12 wire
1
(dw = 0.391 in) and a clear cover of 1 /2". The trial d of the sidewall
is:
0.391
dw
= 8 1.5
= 6.30 in
2
2
d = (thickness) (clearcover)
The peak moment for tension on the outside face is 117 k-in (top,
2
Strength I: Case 3). The required area of steel is 0.29 in /ft.
The peak moment for tension on the inside face is 35.6 k-in (center,
2
Top Slab:
For the top slab d is:
0.391
d = 9 1.5
= 7.30 in
2
The peak moment for tension on the outside face is 49.4 k-in (end,
2
The peak moment for tension on the inside face is 220 k-in (center,
2
OCTOBER 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
12-29
Bottom Slab:
0.391
= 8.30 in
2
The peak moment for tension on the outside face is 62.4 k-in (end,
d = 10 1.5

The peak moment for tension on the inside face is 285 k-in (center,
2
G. Check Crack
Control
[5.7.3.4]
[5.7.3.4-1]
To ensure that the primary reinforcement is well distributed, crack control

equations are checked.
The equations are dependent on the yield
strength of the reinforcement, the concrete cover, and the area of
concrete assumed to participate with a reinforcing bar or wire. The Z
parameter is varied according to the use of the concrete structure.
Mn/DOT uses a Z value of 130 for box culvert design.
Z
fs fsa =
0.6 fy
0.33
(d A)
c
The service limit state stress in the rebar is found using cracked section
analysis methods.
[5.4.2.4 & 5.7.1]
Begin by finding the modular ratio between reinforcing steel and

concrete.
Es
29000
n=
=
= 7.1
Use n=7
1.5
Ec
33000 (.145)
5.0
Sidewall:
2
Try W12 wire at a 4" spacing, As = 0.36 in /ft, d = 6.30 in,
dc = 1.70 in
Outside face tension; Max. service moment M = 81.7 k-in
Area of concrete assumed to participate with the reinforcement:
A=
2 dc b
N
2 1.70 12
12/4
= 13.60 in
The maximum permitted stress in the reinforcement is:

Z
130
fsa =
=
= 46.1 0.6 65 = 39.0 ksi
0.33
0.33
(d A)
(1.70 13.60)
c
Begin by computing the transformed area of the reinforcement.

n A s = 7 0.36 = 2.52 in
OCTOBER 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
12-30
Find the location of the neutral axis:

b=12"
N.A.
d = 6.31"
d-x
nAs
1
2
1
2
b x = n A s (d x)
12 x = 2.52 (6.30 x)
Next, find the internal lever arm:

x
1.43
j d = d = 6.30
= 5.82 in
3
3
The stress in the reinforcement is:
M
81.7
fs =
=
= 39.0 = fsa = 39.0 ksi
A s j d 0.36 5.82
OK
Similar calculations were made for the sidewall inside face and both faces
of the top slab and the bottom slab. See Table 12.6.3 for calculated
values at other locations.
H. Check Fatigue
[5.5.3]
[Table 3.4.1-1]
[3.6.2.1-3.6.2.2]
Mn/DOT practice is to perform fatigue check calculations for the design of

box culverts. Typically with fill heights over 2'-0", fatigue will not govern
the design.
Calculate the stress in the reinforcement due to the fatigue. Assume a
cracked cross section and neglect the benefit of axial compression.
OCTOBER 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN

Sidewall:
Outside face
M=11.4 k-in, As=0.36 in /ft

jd= 5.82 in, fs=5.44 ksi
Top Slab:
Inside face
M=21.9, As=0.60 in /ft

jd = 6.61 in, fs = 5.52 ksi
Bottom Slab:
Inside face
[5.5.3.2]
12-31
M=21.9 k-in, As= 0.72 in /ft

jd = 7.51 in, fs = 4.05 ksi
The general equation for allowable fatigue stress in reinforcement is:

r
ff = 21 0.33 fmin + 8
h
Use the default value for the ratio of base radius to height of rolled on
transverse deformations for the reinforcement:
r
= 0.3
h
Use the Service I: Case 2 moment to compute the minimum stress in the
sidewall reinforcement. Use the Service I: Case 1 moment without live
load to compute the minimum stress in the slab reinforcement.
Sidewall:
fmin =
M
As j d
57.8
0.36 5.82
= 27.6 ksi
ff = 21 0.33 27.6 + 8 0.3 = 15.1 > 5.44 ksi
OK
Top slab:
fmin =
89.8
0.60 6.61
= 22.6 ksi
ff = 21 0.33 22.6 + 8 0.3 = 15.9 > 5.47 ksi
OK
Bottom Slab:
121.4
fmin =
= 22.5 ksi
0.72 7.51
ff = 21 0.33 22.5 + 8 0.3 = 16.0 > 4.03 ksi
OK
OCTOBER 2003
I. Check Minimum
Reinforcement
[12.11.4.3.2]
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
12-32
For precast culverts the minimum amount of flexural reinforcement in the

cross section is a percentage of the gross area:
Minimum sidewall reinforcement:
2
A s = 0.002 [thickness] [width] = 0.002 8 12 = 0.19 in /ft
Minimum top slab reinforcement:
2
A s = 0.002 9 12 = 0.22 in /ft
Minimum bottom slab reinforcement:
2
A s = 0.002 10 12 = 0.24 in /ft
For cast-in-place culverts the minimum reinforcement check (LRFD Article
5.7.3.3.2) is satisfied if 133% of the reinforcement necessary for
strength is provided.
J. Check Maximum
Reinforcement
Limit [5.7.3.3.1]
The maximum reinforcement check is satisfied if:

c
0.42
d
'
For fc = 5.0 ksi, 1 = 0.80
Sidewall:
Outside face
c=
a
1
= 0.57 in
c
d
0.57
6.30
OK
= 0.09
Top Slab:
Inside face
0.96 in
1.15 in
c
d
0.96
7.25
= 0.13
OK
= 0.14
OK
Bottom Slab:
Inside face
c
d
1.15
8.26
OCTOBER 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
12-33
Table 12.6.3 Flexural Design Calculation Summary
Strength
Sidewall
Outside
Inside
Outside
Inside
Outside
Moment (k-in)
35.6
112.6
210.9
49.4
274.7
55.9
Assumed d (in)
6.30
6.30
7.30
7.30
8.30
8.30
Reqd steel area (in )
0.09
0.29
0.48
0.11
0.55
0.12
Moment (k-in)
8.0
79.2
153.1
22.8
203.4
46.2
W4 @ 4"
W12 @ 4"
W20 @ 4"
W4 @ 4"
W18 @ 3"
W4 @ 3"
AS (in /ft)
0.12
0.36
0.60
0.12
0.72
0.12
d (in)
6.39
6.30
7.25
7.39
8.26
8.39
A (in )
12.88
13.60
14.00
12.88
11.04
9.66
fsa (ksi)
39.0
39.0
39.0
39.0
39.0
39.0
jd (in)
6.10
5.82
6.61
7.07
7.51
8.00
fs (ksi)
10.9
39.0
38.6
26.9
37.4
36.1
Moment range (k-in)
11.4
21.9
21.9
Min. Moment
57.8
89.8
121.4
fmin (ksi)
27.6
22.6
22.5
ff (ksi)
15.1
15.9
16.0
fs (ksi)
5.44
5.52
4.05
0.19
0.19
0.22
0.22
0.24
0.24
0.09
0.13
0.14
Spacing (in)
Service
Fatigue
Bottom Slab
Inside
Assumed Wire Size,
Min/
Max
Check
Top Slab
0.002 Ag (in /ft)

c
/d
K. Summary of
Required Flexural
Reinforcement
The area of reinforcement necessary to satisfy strength, crack control,

fatigue and minimum reinforcement levels is:
Sidewall:
Outside face
Inside face
As = 0.36 in /ft
2
As = 0.19 in /ft
Top Slab:
Outside face
Inside face
As = 0.22 in /ft
2
As = 0.60 in /ft
Bottom Slab:
Outside face
Inside face
As = 0.24 in /ft
2
As = 0.72 in /ft
OCTOBER 2003
L. Check Shear
[5.8.1]
[5.14.5.3]
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
12-34
The concrete shear strength for box culvert slabs is given by:
As
V d
Vc = 0.0676 f 'c + 4.6
u e b de
b de
Mu
Except under deep fills the shear capacity rarely governs. To simplify the
calculations drop the second term in the brackets and use:
'
Vc = 0.0676 fc b de
Sidewall
The maximum design shear is:
Vu = 4.28 kips
The capacity is:
(bottom, Strength I: Case 2)
Vc = 0.90 0.0676 5.0 12 6.30 = 10.28 > 4.28 kips
Top Slab
Vu = 8.04 kips
The capacity is:
OK
(end, Strength I: Case 1)
Vc = 0.90 0.0676 5.0 12 7.25 = 11.84 > 8.04 kips OK
Bottom Slab
Vu = 9.44 kips
The capacity is:
(end, Strength I: Case 1)
Vc = 0.90 0.0676 5.0 12 8.26 = 13.48 > 9.44 kips OK
M. Check Thrust
The axial capacity of the culvert should be checked to ensure it satisfies

the provisions of LRFD Article 5.7.4. For this design example, the
sidewall member will be checked. It has the largest thrust value and the
least thickness.
The design axial load is:
PU = 12.1 kips
(bottom Strength I, Case 3)
If the factored axial load is less than 10% of the nominal compressive
capacity of the section, flexural design can be performed ignoring axial
OCTOBER 2003
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
12-35
load effects. Without stirrups in the section, the resistance factor for
compression is 0.70.
[Eq. 5.7.4.5-3]
0.10 f'c A g = 0.10 0.70 5.0 (8.0 12.0) = 33.6 >> 12.1 kips
By inspection, the section has adequate axial capacity. Note that the
bending capacity of the sidewalls would benefit from the applied axial
force. Since the benefit is small, the interaction is neglected.
N. Summary
Figure 12.6.5 illustrates the required reinforcing for the inside face and
outside face of the sidewalls, top slab, and bottom slab.
Note that if reinforcing bars are used rather than welded wire fabric, the
required reinforcement must be increased by a factor of 65/60 = 1.08 to
account for the difference in yield strength. Also, crack control must be
rechecked.
Figure 12.6.5 - Box Culvert Reinforcing
MAY 2006
13. RAILINGS
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
13-1
Section 13 of the LRFD Specifications addresses the design of railings.

Railings is used as a generic term in the specifications. Railings include
traffic safety barriers as well as median barriers, bicycle, and pedestrian
railings.
The design requirements for railings utilized on Mn/DOT bridges have
undergone changes in recent years as the Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA) established crash-testing requirements and the
AASHTO Specifications were revised accordingly. Additionally, the desire
for more attractive railings has influenced the style of railings on projects
where aesthetics is a major consideration. Accidents involving objects
thrown from overpasses onto traffic below has led to the adoption of
protective screening requirements. The rapid increase in bicycle trails and
traffic has increased attention on bicycle railings. This section of the
LRFD Bridge Design Manual details our policies regarding the design of
bridge railings for Mn/DOT projects.
13.1 Materials
Reinforced concrete, steel, and timber are all used for railings. The
majority of traffic railings are reinforced concrete. Bridges with timber
decks on low volume secondary roads may have timber railings.
Pedestrian and bicycle railings are typically galvanized steel that has
been painted for aesthetics.
13.2 Design
Requirements
The design of newly constructed bridge railings must conform to the

requirements of Section 13 of the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design
Specifications.
This specification gives geometric and strength
requirements and also describes crash test levels. FHWA requires all
bridges carrying traffic on the National Highway System (NHS) to be
crash tested in accordance with NCHRP Report 350 Recommended
Procedures for the Safety Performance Evaluation of Highway Features.
There are six levels of service and testing depending on vehicle size and
speed. A list of crash tested railings is found on the following FHWA Web
sites:
http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/bridgerail/
http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/roadway_dept/road_hardware/bridgerailings.htm
http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/roadway_dept/road_hardware/longbarriers.htm
MAY 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
13-2
Crash testing requirements may be waived if the railing in question is

similar in geometrics to an approved crash tested rail and an analytical
evaluation shows the railing to be crash worthy. This allows minor
changes to crash tested railings without having to go through the time
and expense of crash testing.
For bridges on the NHS any such
evaluation must be approved by the FHWA.
Crash testing has shown that during impact vehicles slide along the top of
the railing and parts of the vehicle, especially the boxes on trucks, extend
beyond the face of the railing a considerable distance. The envelope of
the vehicle encroachment beyond the face of railing is known as the zone
of intrusion. Attachments to bridge railings, such as architectural metal
railings or objects just behind the railing (such as light poles), must
address safety concerns presented by this encroachment, which include:
1) Snagging - which can cause the attachment or the vehicle hood to
penetrate the occupant compartment.
2) Spearing objects, such as a horizontal railing member, penetrating
windshields and injuring occupants.
3) Debris falling onto traffic below.
A Midwest Roadside Safety Facility report, titled Guidelines for
Attachment to Bridge Rails and Median Barriers, February 26, 2003,
identifies zones of intrusion for several types of railings. Figure 13.2.1
shows the zone of intrusion for a Test Level 4 barrier.
Generally attachments within the zone of intrusion shall be designed to
break away before severely damaging the vehicle, contain any debris
from damaging traffic below, and have no members (such as rail ends)
that might spear the occupant compartment of the vehicle. Ends of rails
shall be sloped at 45 degrees or less to top of barrier to reduce the
chance of spearing. Posts shall be set back from the face of railing to
minimize snagging.
(See Sections 13.2.1 and 13.2.3 for setback
requirements.)
Railing designs shall include consideration of safety, cost, aesthetics and
maintenance. Safety shapes (Types J and F) were developed to minimize
damage to vehicles, as well as to contain and redirect vehicles back onto
the roadway, and have low initial and maintenance costs. Use of designs
that allow for easy replacement of damaged sections and use of standard
railings can minimize maintenance costs since replacement components
can be stockpiled.
Three general classes of bridge railings are Traffic Railings, Pedestrian or
Bicycle Railings, and Combination Railings. Bridge cross sections showing
MAY 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
13-3
these three classes are shown in Figure 13.2.2. Railing classes are
further defined in the following sections. Also, refer to Table 13.2.1 for
guidance on standard rail applications.
Figure 13.2.1
Intrusion Zones for TL-4 Barriers
Reproduced from Keller, Sicking, Faller, Polivka & Rhode, Guidelines for Attachments to Bridge
Rails and Median Barriers, (Midwest Roadside Safety Facility, February 26, 2003), page 24.
1
MAY 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 13.2.2
13-4
Rail
Type
Traffic
TL-4
TL-4
TL-4
TL-4
TL-4
Solid Median Barrier (Type F, TL-4)

5-397.130: w/ W.C.
Split Median Barrier (Type F, TL-4)

5-397.131: w/ W.C.
Solid Median Barrier and Glare Screen (Type F, TL-4)

5-397.132: w/ W.C.
Split Median Barrier and Glare Screen (Type F, TL-4)

5-397.135: w/o W.C.
5-397.136: w/ W.C
Offset Split Median Barrier and Glare Screen (Type F,

TL-4)
5-397.137: w/ W.C.
TL-5
Concrete Barrier (Type F, TL-5) w/ Sidewalk

5-397.125: Integral End Post w/ W.C.
5-397.126: Integral End Post w/o W.C.
TL-5
TL-5
Concrete Barrier (Type F, TL-5)


5-397.129: Integral End Post w/o W.C
TL-4
Test
Level

5-397.114: Separate End Post w/o W.C.
5-397.116: Separate End Post w/ W.C.
Description
Traffic Only
Application
All
All
All
All
All
All
All
Use where roadways are at

different elevations. (Usually on
superelevated bridges.)
Traffic Only
Traffic Only
Bridges with a longitudinal joint

between roadways. (Usually the
bridge is very wide or is to be
constructed in stages.)
Traffic Only
Bridges with designated bike path

or where glare screen is required.
Between sidewalk and roadway

where the shoulder is < 6'.
> 40 mph High Protection Area where

Dc > 5 and Speed > 40 mph.
All
Speed
Limit
TABLE 13.2.1: Standard Rail Applications
4'-8" tall
(Separation allows both sides to be
slipformed.)
4'-8" tall
4'-8" tall
2'-8" tall
(For stage construction, each half of
barrier meets TL-4 standard.)
2'-8" tall
4'-8" tall
3'-6" tall
(The additional height is to protect
a bicycle rider from falling over the
railing into traffic.)
3'-6" tall
(Gives added protection to
motorists on high speed, high
curvature roadways. Modify
standard to remove sidewalk.)
2'-8" tall
Comment
MAY 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
13-5
Rail
Type
Traffic
Combination
(Traffic and Ped./Bicycle)
TL-4
TL-2
Ped. &
Bike
Ped. &
Bike
Structural Tube Railing (Design T-2)

5-397.158
Concrete Barrier (Type P-1, TL-2) and Structural

Tube Railing with Fence (Design T-3)
5-397.212
5' Wire Fence (Design W-1) for Pedestrian Bridges

5-397.202
8' Wire Fence for Pedestrian Walks

5-397.205
TL-2
Concrete Barrier (Type P-1, TL-2) and Wire Fence

(Design W-1)
5-397.119: Integral End Post
5-397.120: Separate End Post
TL-2
TL-4
Concrete Barrier (Type P-4, TL-4)

Concrete Barrier (Type P-1, TL-2) and Metal Railing

for Bikeway (Type M-1)
5-397.154: Integral End Post
TL-4
Test
Level
Concrete Barrier (Type P-2, TL-4) and Structural

Tube Railing (Type T-1)
5-397.157: w/ Integral End Post
Description
Traffic Only
Traffic Only, where an aesthetic

railing is desired.
Application
(cont.)
Yes
5' tall chain link fence
8' tall chain link fence
Pedestrian bridges or sidewalks

separated from roadways by a
traffic barrier.
traffic barrier.
2'-4" parapet and 5'-8 " metal rail

with chain link fabric
40 mph Highway bridges with walks. This

rail is used on the outside edge of
walk and meets bicycle and
protective screening requirements.
Yes
Top of metal railing 1'-10" above

top of 2'-8" Type F rail (Total height
of 4'-6"+ meets bicycle standard.)
2'-4" parapet with 2'-2" metal rail

(Modify for separate end post.)
2'-4" parapet and 6' metal rail with

chain link fabric.
2'-8" tall
1'-3" metal railing on 1'-9" parapet

(Designer must modify detail for
separate end post or no W.C.)
Comment
Attachment to Type F rail for use

where significant bicycle traffic will
be using roadway shoulder.
All
40 mph Outside edge of walk on highway

bridges with sidewalks where
bicycle traffic on the walk is
expected and protective screening
is not required.

All
All
Speed
Limit
TABLE 13.2.1: Standard Rail Applications
NOTES:
Crash testing levels refer to NCHRP Report 350. The structural tube traffic rail (Bridge Details Manual Part II, Fig. 5-397.157) and bicycle rail attachment
to Type F rail (Bridge Details Manual Part II, Fig. 5-397.158) were developed by Minnesota and crash tested through the pooled fund program.
Combination railings with the 2'-4" parapet have been judged to meet crash Test Level 2 (TL-2) by comparison to other crash tested vertical face railings.
Railing heights are measured to the finished surface (top of wearing course).
Information on current costs of these railings may be obtained from the Bridge Estimating Unit.
Combination railings may also be used as bicycle/pedestrian railings. The 2'-4" parapet height permits a wider spacing of spindles (6" openings rather
than the 4" openings required up to 27" above the finished surface).
Ped./Bicycle
MAY 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
13-6
Rail
Type
Combination
(Traffic and Ped./Bicycle)
TL-2
TL-2
TL-2
TH 212 Corridor Standard

Bridge No. 27148

Ornamental Metal Railing Type DWG
Bridge No. 27222
Victoria Street Railing

Bridge No. 62823
TL-2
St. Peter Railing

Bridge No. 27R05
TL-2
TL-2
Concrete Barrier (Type P-3, TL-2) and Ornamental

Metal Railing (Type M-2)

Bridge No. 27285
TL-2
Test
Level
Cloquet Railing
Bridge No. 09008 and 09009
Description
3'-9" metal rail on 2'-4" parapet

(Developed by City of Minneapolis
for use on bridges in their city.)
(Bridge No. 23022 has a 2'-2"
height of metal rail for use where
protective screening is not needed.)
5'-8' to 9'-2" metal rail on 2'-4"

parapet
5'-51/2" metal rail on 2'-4" parapet

(Sheet is metric.)

with chain link fabric

Comment
2'-2 3/4" metal rail on 2'-4" parapet
(Sheet is metric.)
Application
40 mph Outside edge of walk on highway

bridges with sidewalks where
bicycle traffic on the walk is
expected and protective screening
is not required.
Speed
Limit
TABLE 13.2.2: Non-Standard Rail Applications
MAY 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
13-7
Rail
Type
St. Peter Rail

Bridge No. 40002
Lexington Rail
Bridge No. 62823
Gooseberry Falls Suspended Walkway Rail

Bridge No. 38010
Description
Ped. &
Bike
Ped. &
Bike
Ped.
Test
Level
N/A
N/A
N/A
Speed
Limit

traffic barrier.

traffic barrier.

traffic barrier.
Application
(cont.)
4'-6" tall (Sheet is metric.)
Comment
NOTES:
Crash testing levels refer to NCHRP Report 350. Combination railings with the 2'-4" parapet have been judged to meet crash Test Level 2 (TL-2) by
comparison to other crash tested vertical face railings.
Railing heights are measured to the finished surface (top of wearing course).
Information on current costs of these railings may be obtained from the Bridge Estimating Unit.
Combination railings may also be used as pedestrian/ bicycle railings. The 2'-4" parapet height permits a wider spacing of spindles (6" openings rather
than the 4", which is required in the lower 27").
Pedestrian/Bicycle
TABLE 13.2.2: Non-Standard Rail Applications
MAY 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
13-8
MAY 2006
13.2.1 Traffic
Railing
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
13-9
Traffic railings are designed to contain and safely redirect vehicles.

Requirements based on speed are as follows.
1) High Speed Roadways with a Design Speed > 40 mph
Mn/DOT requires crash testing to Test Level 4 as the minimum
standard for these roadways. Test Level 4 is run with a small car and
a pickup truck at 60 mph and a single unit van truck impacting at 50
mph. This railing will normally be the 32" high Type F barrier (Bridge
Details Manual Part II, Figure 5-397.114-117). Where aesthetic
needs warrant, the tubular traffic railing (Bridge Details Manual Part
II, Figure 5-397.157) is an acceptable alternative that provides an
increased viewing opportunity to drivers crossing the bridge. It
consists of a structural tube and posts mounted to the top of a 1'-9"
high concrete base. Note, however, that the tubular traffic railing has
higher initial and maintenance costs than the Type F barrier. Consult
the Preliminary Bridge Unit for additional acceptable railings.
Mn/DOT has developed a bicycle railing attachment to the Type F
barrier for use where the bridge shoulders carry a bicycle route as
defined in the Mn/DOT State Bicycle Transportation System Plan or
another recognized authority. This attachment (Bridge Details Manual
Part II, Figure 5-397.158) adds height to the railing to protect bicycle
riders and has been crash tested to Test Level 4. It has a cable
system inside the rail tubes that will contain the rail pieces in the
event of an accident. It also uses weakened posts designed to lessen
the impact to vehicles in the event of a hit. This railing may be
applied to other traffic barriers provided that the same or greater
offset distance to the face of metal rail is provided and the post
attachment has the same or greater strength. The cable system must
be maintained even if there is no traffic below as the cables act to
keep the entire rail system intact during a crash.
The zone of intrusion (see Section 13.2 for definition) shall be kept
free of rail attachments or other features unless they have been crash
tested or an analytical evaluation has shown them to be crash worthy.
Exceptions to this policy include noise walls and safety features such
as signs or lights. Note that light poles shall be located behind the
back of the barrier. When noise walls are attached, consider using a
higher Type F barrier to lessen the risk. The zone of intrusion for a
TL-4 railing is shown in Figure 13.2.1.
A more stringent rail design may be considered on a
basis for bridges with high design speeds, high truck
curvature or other site-specific safety considerations.
Test Level 5 railing should be considered for these sites.
case-by-case
volume, and
Generally a
Test Level 5
MAY 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
13-10
includes a small car and a pickup truck traveling at 60 mph plus a

van-type tractor trailer impacting at 50 mph. As a guide, a 42" high
Type F barrier that meets TL-5 requirements is recommended for
bridges having a horizontal curvature of 5 degrees and sharper on a
roadway where the design speed is 45 mph or higher.
The
Preliminary Bridge Plans Engineer will designate the rail design on the
Preliminary Bridge Plan.
2) Low Speed Roadways with a Design Speed 40 mph
Mn/DOT requires crash testing to Test Level 2 as the minimum
standard for these roadways. Test Level 2 is run with a small car and
pickup truck both impacting at a speed of 45 mph.
Normally these railings will be the same as used for higher speeds,
usually the Type F concrete barrier, but with the reduced level
required for crash testing more options are available. Consult the
Preliminary Bridge Unit for additional acceptable railings.
If the addition of an ornamental metal railing is desired on the top of
the traffic railing, a 32" high vertical faced concrete barrier (see
Bridge Details Manual Part II, Figure 5-397.173) shall be used rather
than the Type F barrier. The vertical face will cause more damage to
a vehicle for minor hits but reduces the tendency for the vehicle to
climb the face or roll over and will keep the vehicle back from the
metal rail. A small 2" wide by 6" high curb is provided at the base to
minimize snowplow damage to the barrier. For design speeds of
35 mph and below a metal railing may be used on the top of the
concrete barrier with no minimum offset required, as it is unlikely that
vehicles will contact the metal portion.2 With a design speed of 40
mph the front face of the metal railing shall be offset a minimum of 9"
from the face of barrier at the top of concrete.3
It is strongly recommended that a smooth face be used on the highway
side of concrete barriers. Aesthetic treatments on the highway face
increase the risk of vehicle snagging. In addition, in this environment the
aesthetics treatment will routinely experience vehicle hits, snowplow
scrapes, and high exposure to salt. As a result, their performance will be
greatly reduced, causing increased maintenance costs.
2
Rails and Median Barriers, (Report dated February 26, 2003), pages 3 and 27.
3
Rails and Median Barriers, (Report dated February 26, 2003), page 15 and 16. 9" offset at
40 mph judged acceptable based on 12" offset at 45 mph.
MAY 2006
13.2.2 Pedestrian/
Bicycle Railing
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
13-11
Pedestrian or bicycle railings are generally located at the outside edge of

a bridge sidewalk and are designed to safely contain pedestrians or
bicyclists. AASHTO specifications require pedestrian railings to be at
least 3'-6" in height and bicycle railings to be at least 4'-6" in height.
The height is measured from the top of walkway to top of the highest
horizontal rail component.
Openings between members of a pedestrian railing shall not allow a 4"
sphere to pass through the lower 27" of the railing and a 6" sphere
should not pass through any openings above 27". This is more restrictive
than AASHTO and is intended to prevent small children from slipping
through the railing.
The International Building Code requires a 4"
maximum opening.
13.2.3
Combination
Railing
Combination railings are dual purpose railings designed to contain both

vehicles and pedestrians or bicycles. These railings are generally located
at the outside edge of a bridge sidewalk. A raised sidewalk is used to
clearly define the walkway area and keep roadway drainage off the
walkway. The sidewalk curb offers some protection to pedestrians from
errant vehicles entering the walkway. There is no other barrier between
the roadway and the sidewalk. Combination railings are applicable for
design speeds of 40 mph and under. Mn/DOT requires crash testing to
Test Level 2 for these railings and the strength and geometrics
requirements for bicycle or pedestrian railings also apply.
Combination railings will normally consist of a 2'-4" high concrete parapet
with a fence or ornamental metal railing mounted on the top. The
concrete parapet serves to contain traffic and has been judged to meet
crash Test Level 2. The metal railing must comply with the strength and
geometric requirements for bicycle or pedestrian railings. A non-crash
tested metal railing may be used on the top of the concrete barrier, as it
is unlikely that vehicles will make contact with the metal portion.
For typical applications, the highway face of a concrete parapet shall be
relatively smooth for ease of construction (slipforming) and maintenance.
Where aesthetic needs warrant it, beveled recesses up to 2" deep may be
allowed for inset panels and beveled form liner textures. Concrete posts
above the parapet are acceptable but they may not project in front of the
parapet.
For design speeds greater than 40 mph, a traffic railing is required
between the roadway and sidewalk or bikeway. Use a 32" high Type F
barrier for the traffic railing when the shoulder is 6'-0" or greater in
width. If the roadway shoulder is less than 6'-0", use a 42" Type F
MAY 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
13-12
barrier for added protection. Metal railings shall not be placed on top of a
traffic railing between a sidewalk and a roadway. Although metal railings
may somewhat increase protection for bicyclists, they are a risk hazard to
vehicles.
13.2.4 Strength of
Standard Concrete
Barriers
Barrier resistance values have been determined for the standard Mn/DOT
concrete barriers and are shown in Table 13.2.4.1. They are based on
using both near and far face reinforcement as tension reinforcement.
These values can be used when analyzing deck overhangs to determine
reinforcement requirements.
(See Section 9.2.4J for an overhang
reinforcement design example.)
4.6
4.6
9.3
9.2
9.3
9.2
9.3
9.2
4.5
4.1
4.2

5-397.116: Separate End Post w/ W.C.


Concrete Barrier (Type F, TL-5) w/ Sidewalk

Concrete Barrier (Type F, TL-5) w/Sidewalk

Concrete Barrier and Glare Screen (Type F, TL-5)

5-397.128: Integral End Post w/W.C.
Concrete Barrier and Glare Screen (Type F, TL-5)

Split Median Barrier (Type F, TL-4)

5-397.131: w/ W.C.

5-397.135: w/o W.C.

5-397.136: w/ W.C.
Lc
(ft)

5-397.114: Separate End Post w/o W.C.
Description
End Panel
61.1
55.8
54.0
133.6
128.5
133.6
128.5
133.6
128.5
57.2
59.2
Rw
(kips)
TABLE 13.2.4.1: Resistance Values for Standard Concrete Barriers
9.2
9.0
12.1
14.0
14.3
14.0
14.3
14.0
14.3
10.2
9.9
Lc
(ft)
107.5
106.6
91.1
131.4
128.8
131.4
128.8
131.4
128.8
122.9
124.1
Rw
(kips)
Interior Panel
MAY 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
13-13

5-397.119
5-397.120
5-397.154
5-397.212


5-397.157: w/ Integral End Post
Offset Split Median Barrier and Glare Screen (Type F, TL-4)

5-397.137: w/ W.C.
Description
4.9
4.6
4.6
4.2
Lc
(ft)
End Panel
50.4
76.8
87.7
61.1
Rw
(kips)
TABLE 13.2.4.1: Resistance Values for Standard Concrete Barriers
9.2
9.9
9.0
9.2
Lc
(ft)
103.7
151.7
196.7
107.5
Rw
(kips)
Interior Panel
MAY 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
13-14
MAY 2006
13.2.5 Protective
Screening
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
13-15
The addition of protective screening to bridge railings is a further Mn/DOT

policy requirement.
The practice of adding protective screening is
common nationwide in response to accidents and fatalities that have
occurred due to pedestrians throwing objects from overpasses onto
vehicles below.
Protective screening must be included in the design of new bridges that
accommodate pedestrians when the bridge crosses a roadway or railroad,
and also when railings are replaced on existing bridges as follows:
On bridges where a sidewalk is included in the design, incorporate a
protective screening system in the design of the railing adjacent to
the sidewalk.
On pedestrian bridges, place the protective screening on both sides of
the bridge.
The protective screening system will be, preferably, a chain link fence
system or a railing system. The height of the fence or railing shall be
8'-0" above the top of the sidewalk. For sites with special aesthetic
treatments involving ornamental railings a minimum height of 6'-0" will
be allowed. However, it should be recognized that the lower railing
height provides a reduced level of protection. The protective screening
system shall not allow objects 6" or greater in diameter to pass through
the fence or railing.
13.2.6
Architectural/
Ornamental
Railings
In response to local requests, special railing designs have been

incorporated in some projects to address aesthetic concerns. These
ornamental architectural bridge railings have been utilized in lieu of
standard combination railings for placement on the outboard side of
bridge sidewalks. The Bridge Office will consider railing designs in
addition to our standard railings for such locations and corridors. It is
recommended that special railings incorporate features from the standard
railings (such as connection details) as significant effort has gone into the
development of these details.
Mn/DOT participation in the cost of aesthetic railings is governed by the
Mn/DOT Policy Manual of June 2001. Refer to these documents for more
information:
Guidelines: Mn/DOT Policy and Procedures for Cooperative
Construction Projects with Local Units of Government
Position Statement: Mn/DOT Policy and Procedures for Cooperative
Construction Projects with Local Units of Government
MAY 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
13-16
Railings are included with other aesthetic costs of the bridge. Mn/DOT
participation is limited to 5%, 7% or 15% of the cost of a basic bridge,
depending on the aesthetic level of the bridge.
Cost participation of architectural/ornamental railings on local bridges is
generally funded up to the prorated cost of standard railing or chain link
fence. Consult the State-Aid for Local Transportation Office for conditions
on bridge funding eligibility.
13.3 Design
Examples
Two design examples follow. The first illustrates the design procedures
associated with a conventional Type F barrier.
The second design
example illustrates the steps undertaken for the design of adhesive
anchors to support a metal railing.
MAY 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
13-17
13.3.1 Type F
Barrier Design
Example
This example illustrates a design check of the vertical reinforcing steel

that ties a standard Mn/DOT Type F barrier to a concrete deck. The
geometry of the barrier and the reinforcing bar sizes and types are
illustrated in Bridge Details Part II Fig. 5-397.117. The configuration of
the horizontal reinforcing bars in the railing is assumed fixed. The
spacing of the vertical reinforcing steel is checked to ensure adequate
capacity is provided. The design check uses the method described in
LRFD Article A13.3.1.
A. Design Forces
and Dimensions
Mn/DOTs Type F barrier satisfies the geometric height constraint of a

TL-4 barrier and has satisfactorily passed crash testing to such a level.
The design forces and dimensional limits for a TL-4 barrier presented in
LRFD Table A13.2-1 are repeated below.
[13.7.3.2]
Design Forces and Designations
TL-4 Barrier
Ft Transverse (kip)
54
FL Longitudinal (kip)
18
FV Vertical/Down (kip)
18
L t and LL (ft)
3.5
L V (ft)
18
He Minimum Height of Horizontal Loads (in)
32
H Minimum Height of Rail (in)
32
The design
variables:
Mb the
Mw the
Mc the
is based on yield line analysis methods and has three

flexural capacity of the cap beam (if present)
flexural capacity of the railing about its vertical axis
flexural capacity of the railing about a horizontal axis
LRFD Article 13.1 cautions designers that railings placed on retaining

walls or spread footings may require investigation beyond that presented
in this example. The governing or controlling yield line mechanism is
assumed to form in the railing. If additional mechanisms with potentially
lower load capacities are possible, designers should investigate them.
The yield line mechanisms vary with rail location. Interior rail regions are
assumed to have three yield lines. Two of the yield lines have tension on
the inside of the railing and one has tension on the outside of the railing.
See Figure 13.3.1.1, reproduced from LRFD Figure CA13.3.1-1.
The assumed failure mechanism at the end of rail sections (near
deflection joints, expansion joints, openings, etc.) has one yield line that
produces tension on the inside face of the railing. See Figure 13.3.1.2,
reproduced from LRFD Figure CA13.3.1-2.
MAY 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 13.3.1.1
Yield Line Analysis for Interior Region
Figure 13.3.1.2
Yield Line Analysis for End Region
13-18
MAY 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
13-19
Figure 13.3.1.3 contains a rail elevation detail that identifies the location
of interior and end regions. The length of end regions and interior
regions is dependent on the relative flexural capacities of the railing ( Mw
and Mc ). The design example uses L ce to represent the length of end
regions and L ci to represent the length of interior yield line mechanisms.
Holding Mw constant, rail sections with larger Mc resistances have
shorter and steeper yield line mechanisms.
Designers should note that in addition to inclined yield lines, one-way
cantilever resistance of the rail should be investigated for rail segments
with lengths less than twice L ce .
B. Barrier Flexural
Resistance
Three section details of a Type F barrier are presented in Figure 13.3.1.4.

The top section presents typical reinforcement and geometry.
The
horizontal reinforcement consists of eight #13 bars. Two #16 bars are
used for the vertical reinforcement. The R1601E bar is anchored in the
deck and projects 10" into the rail. The R1602E bar is a closed stirrup
that laps the R1601E bar.
The center detail in Figure 13.3.1.4 labels the horizontal reinforcement
and identifies the d dimension assumed in Mw calculations. At any one
yield line location four bars are assumed to provide flexural resistance
and four bars are assumed available to carry shear loads via shear
friction.
[CA13.3.1]
The bottom detail in Figure 13.3.1.4 identifies the d dimension of the

vertical reinforcement at different locations. These values are averaged
to compute Mc .
Determine Mb
The Type F barrier has no additional beam section at its top.
Consequently, the Mb term is equal to zero in the rail resistance
computations.
Determine Mw
Using the center detail of Figure 13.3.1.4 the flexural capacity about a
vertical axis is computed. Bars 1, 3, 5, and 7 are assumed effective for
yield lines that produce tension on the inside face of the rail. Bars 2, 4,
6, and 8 are assumed effective for the case where the yield line has
tension on the outside face of the rail.
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
13-20
Figure 13.3.1.3
APRIL 2005
MAY 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 13.3.1.4
13-21
MAY 2006
[5.7.3.2]
[1.3.2.1]
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
13-22
Mw for Interior Region

Capacities Mn for a typical interior region are listed in the following
table.
The lever arm dimension of the different bars is found by
subtracting half the depth of the flexural compression block.
Mn = A s fy d
2
= 1.0 (for Extreme Event Limit State)

A s = 0.20 in2
fy = 60 ksi
a = c 1 =
A stotal fy
4 0.20 60
= 0.42 in
=
0.85 fc b 0.85 4.0 34
a 0.42
=
= 0.21 in
2
2
Lever Arm
BAR
d (in)
a
(in)
2
7.72
7.51
7.94
7.73
8.88
8.67
9.07
8.86
10.04
9.83
11.93
11.72
10.77
10.56
14.87
14.66
wi
Mno for
Outside Face
Tension (k-in)
Tension (k-in)
90.1
92.8
104.0
106.3
118.0
140.6
126.7
175.9
Totals
Mni for
Inside Face
438.8
515.6
M 438.8 / 12
ni =
=
= 12.92 kip - ft/ft

H
2.83
Mno
Mwo =
H
515.6 / 12
=
= 15.18 kip - ft/ft

2.83
For interior rail regions there is one outside tension yield line and two
inside tension yield lines. Compute the average Mw :
M
wint
2 M
wi
+ 1 Mwo
3
2 12.92 + 1 15.18
= 13.7 kip - ft/ft
3
MAY 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
13-23
Mw for End Region

At end regions not all of the horizontal bars will be fully developed by the
time they intersect with the anticipated yield line. Assume the L ce
dimension is at least 4.0 feet. The #13 bars have a development length
of 12". Figure 13.3.1.5 shows the reinforcement in the end region of the
rail in relation to the assumed yield line.
Figure 13.3.1.5
Similar to the interior region, the lever arm is found by subtracting off
one half of the depth of the flexural compression block.
a
Mn = A s fy d
2
= 1.0 (for Extreme Event Limit State)

A s = 0.20 in2
fy = 60 ksi
a = c 1 =
A stotal fy
0.85 fc b
a 0.32
=
= 0.16 in
2
2
0.62 60
= 0.32 in
0.85 4.0 34
MAY 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
13-24
Capacities Mn for the end region are listed in the following table.
BAR
Embedded
Length (in)
Bar
Developed
Fraction
Bar Area
Developed
A s (in )
d (in)
Lever Arm
a
d
(in)
2
Mn for
Inside Face
Tension (kin)
36
1.00
0.20
7.72
7.56
90.7
24.9
1.00
0.20
8.88
8.72
104.6
10.9
0.91
0.18
10.04
9.88
106.7
2.1
0.18
0.04
10.77
10.61
25.5
Total
0.62
Total
327.5
Mw is found by averaging the capacity of the rail over the height of the
rail.
Mn 327.5 / 12
Mwend =
=
= 9.6 kip-ft/ft
H 2.83
Determine Mc
The Type F barrier does not have a uniform thickness. Consequently the
d dimension of the vertical reinforcement varies with the vertical
location in the rail. Averaged d dimensions are used to compute Mc
separately for the top and bottom sections. Then a weighted average of
the two sections is taken to determine Mc for the entire rail section.
Using d dimensions labeled in the bottom detail of Figure 13.3.1.4, the
average d dimensions can be found.
Location
d (in)
Top
7.97
Mid Top
10.50
Mid Bottom
11.02
Bottom
14.25
Average d (in)
9.24
12.64
Mc for Interior Region
The internal flexural lever arm is dependent on the amount of

reinforcement in the cross section. The maximum spacing of vertical
steel in interior regions is 12". Use a 12" vertical steel spacing to
evaluate the interior rail region.
For the top portion, A stop = 0.31 in2 /ft
atop = c 1 =
A stop fy
0.85 fc b
0.31 60
= 0.46 in
0.85 4.0 12.0
MAY 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
13-25
atop
= 1.0 (0.31)(60) 9.24 0.46 1

Mctop = Mn = A stop fy dtop
2
2 12
= 14.0 kip-ft/ft
For the bottom portion, the R1601E bars are not fully developed at the
rail/deck interface. Determine bar development fraction:
For a straight #16 bar, the basic development length l db is:
l db =
1.25 A b fy
fc
1.25 (0.31)(60)
4
= 11.63 in
or
l db = 0.4 db fy = 0.4 (0.625)(60 ) = 15.00 in
GOVERNS
Using modification factors for epoxy coating (1.2) and bar spacing > 6"
with > 3" cover (0.8), the straight bar development length is:
l db = 1.2 (0.8)(1500 ) = 14.40 in
For a hooked #16 bar, the basic development length l hb is:

l hb =
38.0 db
fc
38.0 (0.625)
4
= 11.88 in
Using modification factors for epoxy coating (1.2) and cover (0.7), the
hooked bar development length is:
l dh = 1.2 (0.7)(11.88) = 9.98 in
Therefore, the benefit derived from the hook is:

14.40 9.98 = 4.42 in
The R1601E bar is hooked with a vertical embedment of 5.18 in.

Then the development fraction is:
Fdev =
5.18 + 4.42
= 0.67
14.40
The required extension beyond the 90 bend for a standard hook (A or G

dimension) is 10" for a #16 bar. The R1601E bar has an extension of
18". Because of this extra extension and the fact that the 18" extension
will have to pull through the top mat of reinforcement in order for the bar
to fail, assume a higher development fraction Fdev = 0.75 .
MAY 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
13-26
Then A sbot = 0.75 (0.31) = 0.23 in 2 /ft

abot = c 1 =
A sbot fy
0.23 60
=
= 0.34 in in
0.85 fc b 0.85 4 12
Mcbot = Mn = A sbot fy dbot bot

2
0.34 1
= 1.0 (0.23)(60) 12.64

= 14.3 kip-ft/ft
2 12
Mc int =
14.0 (1.83) + 14.3 (1.00 )

= 14.1 kip-ft/ft
2.83
Mc for End Region
The end region has nine A16 and nine R16 bars in the end 4.0 feet of
the rail. For the last R16 bar, due to the small amount of bar extending
above the yield line, consider only 8 bars to be effective in resisting load.
Then, the average A stop = 0.62 in 2 /ft
atop = c 1 =
A stop fy
0.62 60
=
= 0.91 in
0.85 fc b 0.85 4 12
atop
= 1.0 (0.62)(60) 9.24 0.91 1

Mctop = Mn = A stop fy dtop
2 12
2
= 27.2 kip-ft/ft
The average effective A sbot = 0.75 (0.62) = 0.47 in 2 /ft

abot = c 1 =
A sbot fy
0.47 60
=
= 0.69 in
0.85 fc b 0.85 4 12
0.69 1
Mcbot = Mn = A sbot fy dbot bot = 1.0 (0.47)(60) 12.64

2
2 12
= 28.9 kip-ft/ft
Then Mcend =
27.2 (1.83) + 28.9 (1.00)

= 27.8 kip-ft/ft
2.83
MAY 2006
C. Flexural
Capacity Check
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
13-27
With Mw and Mc computed for an interior and end region, the resistance
of the railing can be computed with the equations in LRFD Article
A13.3.1.
Check the Capacity of an Interior Region
With Mb int = 0 , Mw int = 13.7 kip-ft/ft and Mc int = 14.1 kip-ft/ft, the
length of the yield line mechanism and the resistance of the mechanism
can be found:
8 H (Mbint + Mwint H)
Lt
L
+ t +
= 9.8 ft
2
Mcint
2
[Eqn A13.3.1-1]
L ci =
[Eqn A13.3.1-2]
2
R wi =
2
L
ci L t

M
L 2
8 Mbint + 8 Mwint H + cint ci = 98.0 kips
which, is greater than the 54 kip extreme event design load.

Check the Capacity of the End Region
With Mbend = 0 , Mwend = 9.6 kip-ft/ft and Mcend = 27.8 kip-ft/ft, the
length of the yield line mechanism and the resistance of the mechanism
can be found:
2
Eqn A13.3.1-4
M
L
+ Mwend H
L
= 4.2 ft
L ce = t + t + H bend
Mcend
2
2
[Eqn A13.3.1-3]
2
R we =
2 L ce L t
2

M
L
Mbend + Mwend H + cend ce = 81.8 kips
which, is also greater than the required load capacity of 54 kips.

The other end regions are to be checked similarly.
D. Shear Capacity
Check
Use shear friction methods to evaluate the shear capacity of the joint
between the deck and railing.
Assume that Ft and FL occur
simultaneously.
The resultant shear force is:
Vres = Ft 2 + FL 2 = 542 + 182 = 56.9 kips
[5.8.4]
The basic shear capacity equation for a section using shear friction is:
Vn = [c A cv + (A vf fy + Pc )]
MAY 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
13-28
Neglect cohesion and the small permanent compression across the

interface due to selfweight. Conservatively assume that the interface
between the railing and the deck is not roughened. The appropriate of
friction factor is 0.60.
Substitute Vres for Vn rearranging the remaining terms, and solve for
the required area of reinforcement:
A
vfreq
v
res
=
f
y
v

56.9
=
= 1.58 in2
1.0 0.60 60
The required number of #16 bar legs is:
A
vfreq 1.58 = 5.1 legs
A 0.31
b
Check the interior region first. Assuming the #16 bars are at the
maximum spacing of 12" and the L ci dimension is 9.9 feet, 10 bars will
be provided.
At the end region, nine #16 bars are provided in the end 4.2 feet ( L ce ).
Both interior and end regions have adequate shear capacity at the deck
railing interface.
E. Summary
When checked in accordance with the procedure shown within this

example, the capacity of the end regions adjacent to the expansion joint
and deflection joints did not meet the required 54 kip load capacity.
Because the neutral axis is located very close to the outside face of the
rail for determination of both Mw and Mc , all of the regions were
reanalyzed to take advantage of the additional capacity provided by the
outside face reinforcement. Therefore, in the second analysis, both the
inside face rail reinforcement and the outside face rail reinforcement were
included in the determination of the rail capacity. The revised values for
the F-rail are:
Interior Region:
With wearing course
Without wearing course
L = 10.2 ft
L = 9.9 ft
ci
wi
ci
= 122.9 kip
End Region:
With wearing course
L ce = 4.6 ft
R we = 57.2 kip
wi
= 124.1 kip
Without wearing course

L ce = 4.6 ft
R we = 59.2 kip
APRIL 2005
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
13-29
Adequate vehicle collision load capacity is provided with the default

reinforcing provided in Bridge Details Part II Figure 5-397.117. (See
Figure 13.3.1.6.)
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
13-30
Figure 13.3.1.6
MAY 2006
MAY 2006
13.3.2 Adhesive
Anchor Design
Example
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
13-31
The objective of this example is to design adhesive anchors (as an

alternate to the cast-in-place anchorage) to secure a metal railing atop a
concrete barrier. The railing under consideration is Mn/DOT 5-397.154
Metal Railing for Bikeways (Type M-1) and Concrete Parapet (Type P-1)
(with Integral End Post). The standard anchorage elements beneath
each vertical post are four cast-in-place 5/8" x 8" anchor bolts. All steel
components for the railing have a yield strength of 36 ksi. The concrete
used for the parapet has a design compressive strength of 4 ksi.
The example is structured in a top-down fashion. After
design loads, the railpost and base plate are checked.
shear and tensile capacity of the anchors is computed.
forces, the resistance of steel and concrete is determined
Figure 13.3.2.1
determining the
After that, the
For each of the
individually.
MAY 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
13-32
Reference material on the design of adhesive anchors is limited. The

equations for concrete shear capacity and tension capacity, and modifiers
for group effect and for edge effect presented in this example are based
on material in Behavior and Design of Fastening to Concrete, Richard E.
Klingner, University of Texas at Austin, 48th Annual Concrete Conference,
University of Minnesota, December 3, 1998 and ACI 318, Appendix D.
Reference material on the design of non-adhesive anchors can also be
found in Chapter 6 of the PCI Design Handbook.
Figure 13.3.2.1 presents the typical railpost detail for the railing.
maximum distance L between railposts is 10'-0".
A. Design Loads
[Eqn 13.8.2-1]
[Table 3.4.1-1]
The
Section 13 of the LRFD Specifications covers bridge railings. Article

13.8.2 lists the loads to consider for the design of rail elements and posts
for pedestrian and bicycle railings.
Design railposts to resist
concentrated design live load P LL applied at the height of the top rail
element.
P LL = 0.20 + 0.050 L = 0.20 + 0.050 10 = 0.70 kips
Using a load factor of 1.75 for live load results in a design horizontal
force of:
Hu = 1.75 P LL = 1.75 0.70 = 1.23 kips
Per Figure 13.3.2.1, the lever arm from top rail to top of concrete is
2.17 feet. The design moment at the bottom of the base plate is:
Mupost = Hu d = (1.23) (2.17) = 2.66 k-ft = 31.9 kip-in
B. Railpost Design
Check
[6.12.2.2.4b]
Begin by checking the railpost. It must have adequate capacity to resist

the design moment. By inspection, the rail elements provide adequate
bracing to develop the yield moment of the section. Therefore, the
capacity is:
Mn = My = Fy S
The railpost is a 1/2" x 4" plate loaded about its strong axis.
Spost =
b d2
0.5 42
=
= 1.33 in 3
6
6
MAY 2006
[6.5.4.2]
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
13-33
For steel elements in flexure, f = 1.00 .

f Mn = f Spost Fy = 1.00 1.33 36 = 48 kip-in > 31.9 kip-in
C. Base Plate
Design Check
OK
A plan view of the base plate is shown in Figure 13.3.2.2. Assume that
the critical section occurs at the face of the vertical post (1" from the
edge of the plate on the compression side).
Figure 13.3.2.2
Conservatively assume that the compression reaction, R comp , acts at the

edge of the base plate. The internal lever arm between the anchors and
the compression edge of the plate is 5". Then,
Mupost
31.9
R comp =
=
= 6.38 kips
armint
5.0
and
Muplate = R comp armplate = 6.38 1.0 = 6.38 kip-in
The resisting moment at the face of the column is the capacity of the
plate minus two anchor bolt holes.
Splate
(
bplate 2 dhole ) tplate2
(7 2 0.9375) 0.52
=
=
6
Mrplate = f Splate Fy = 1.00 0.214 36
= 7.70 kip-in > 6.38 kip-in
OK
= 0.214 in 3
MAY 2006
D. Adhesive
Anchor Design
Forces
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
13-34
Factored Shear Force

Assume that the base plate engages each of the anchors equally. Then,
Vu =
Hu 1.23
=
= 0.31 kips/anchor
4
4
Factored Tension Force

Determine the factored tension load Tu on one anchor using the
overturning moment Mupost (31.9 kip-in).
As a simplifying design
practice Mn/DOT uses the distance between anchor rods (4.0 in) as the
flexural lever arm:
Tu =
E. Anchor Rod
Shear Capacity
Mu
31.9
=
= 3.99 kips/anchor
arm N (4.0) 2
The anchor rods are assumed to have sufficient embedment to develop

their shear capacity.
Try Mn/DOT 3385, Type A anchor rods.
Fy = 36 ksi and Fub = 58 ksi
[6.5.4.2]
Since Fy of the Type A anchor rods is equal to Fy for A307 bolts, use
s = 0.65 .
Each anchor rod will be subject to one shear plane. Assume that threads
are included in the shear plane. The area A b of one 5/8" diameter anchor
rod is 0.31 in 2 . Then,
[6.13.2.7]
R n = 0.38 A b Fub Ns = 0.38 0.31 58 1 = 6.83 kips

sR n = 0.65 6.83 = 4.44 kips > 0.31 kips
F. Concrete Shear
Capacity
OK
The concrete shear capacity is a function of geometry and compressive

strength. Assume the two anchors on the compression side of the base
plate connection are the critical shear anchors. For calculation of shear
capacity, consider end effects, edge effects, and group effects. For
this example, end effects need to be considered near the expansion joint
and deflection joints in the parapet. Consider group effects based on the
distances between anchors in a group. Widely spaced anchors function
as individual anchors, while more closely spaced anchors have a reduced
capacity.
MAY 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
13-35
For shear, the end effects, edge effects, and group effects are
incorporated in the calculation for the concrete area effective in resisting
shear. See Figure 13.3.2.3.
Per Mn/DOT policy the center of a railpost can be no closer than 12" to a
deflection joint or an expansion joint end of the parapet. The anchors are
located 2.25 inches away from the center of the railpost. Consequently,
the end distance is dend = 12 2.25 = 9.75 in.
[Klingner]
The anchor rod edge distance c1 = 4 in. The influence distance for shear
is:
1.5 c1 = 1.5 4.0 = 6.0 in < 9.75 in
Therefore, end effects need not be considered for shear.
Figure 13.3.2.3
Two Anchor Shear Interface Area
(From Klingner)
Plugging values into the formula results in:

s = 4.5 in, c = 4 in
1
s
4.5
= 2 acos 1 = 2 acos
= 111.5
2 4
2 c1
2 + sin() c 2 = 49.6 in2

A v =
1
180
MAY 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
13-36
The capacity of the concrete on this interface is:

[Klingner]
Vc _ interface = 4 fc =
4 4000
= 0.253 ksi
1000
Concrete capacity of two anchors in shear is:

Vc2 = A v Vc _ int erface = (49.6 ) (0.253) = 12.54 kips
Concrete capacity of one anchor in shear is:

Vc1 =
Vc2 12.54
=
= 6.27 kips
2
2
Vc1 = 0.90 6.27 = 5.64 kips> 0.31 kips
OK
[Klingner]
Because the shear demand is less than 20% of the shear capacity, ignore
the interaction effects between shear and tension.
G. Anchor Rod
Tension Capacity
Determine the capacity of the anchor rods.

interaction effects need to be considered.
[6.13.2.11]
Pu
Rn
Begin by checking if
0.31
= 0.045 0.33
6.83
The tension capacity can be found without considering shear.

tension capacity of each anchor rod is:
The
Tn = 0.76 Ab Fub = (0.76 ) (0.31) (58) = 13.66 kips
[6.5.4.2]
Using t for an A307 bolt ( t = 0.80 ),

Tn = 0.80 (13.66 ) = 10.93 kips > 3.99 kips
H. Resistance
Factor for Adhesive
Anchor Pullout
OK
In the past, adhesive anchors were designed with allowable stress

methods. A typical factor-of-safety (FS) was 4. A similar safety or
reliability level will be used for LRFD designs. The load factor for live
loads is 1.75. Choose a resistance factor that when combined with the
load factor for live load will produce a factor near 4.
If
FS =
LL
1.75
, then a = u =
a
FS
4
Use a = 0.45
MAY 2006
I. Pullout Capacity
of Adhesive Anchor
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
13-37
According to research referenced by Klingner, the best model for tensile

behavior of adhesive anchors is a simple bond model that assumes a
uniform bond stress over the length of the anchor. Taking into account
end effects, edge effects, and group effects, the factored tensile
resistance a Tna is:
a Tna = a Tn0 c e g
where, Tn0 = nominal adhesive tensile capacity = bond ( danchor L conc )

bond = ultimate bond stress of adhesive
danchor = diameter of steel anchor
L conc = steel anchor embedment length
c = concrete strength variation factor
e = end/edge effect factor
g = group effect factor
Based on adhesive anchor product literature for a 5/8" diameter threaded

rod anchored in concrete with fc = 4 ksi, use an ultimate bond stress
bond = 2 ksi for the adhesive.
The concrete strength variation factor c accounts for variations in bond
stress with changes in concrete strength. For concrete strengths greater
than 3 ksi, c can conservatively be taken equal to 1.0.
End Effect and Edge Effect
The end/edge effect correction is independent of the depth of
embedment. It is only dependent on the ratio of the end/edge distance
to the diameter of the anchor. Consider end/edge effects when adhesive
anchors are located within 10 anchor diameters of an edge.
c 0 = 10 danchor = 10 0.625 = 6.25 in
Actual edge distance c1 = 4.0 in < 6.25 in

[Klingner]
then, e =
0.4
10
c1

danchor
0.4 4
+ 0.60 =
+ 0.60 = 0.86
10 0.625
Group Effect
The reduction in capacity due to group effects is a ratio of the sum of
influence areas for single anchors to that of the group. It is dependent
on the depth of embedment and the spacing between anchors. The
minimum embedment length he min for an adhesive anchor is 6 danchor :
hemin = 6 danchor = 6 0.625 = 3.75 in
MAY 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
13-38
Try an embedment length he = 4.0 in

[Klingner]
The critical spacing between anchors, s o , where group effects disappear

is:
s o = 1.75 he = 7.0 in
The actual spacing between anchors ( s1 dimension) is 4.5 inches.

Therefore, use a group effect reduction in capacity.
Figure 13.3.2.4 shows the influence area for anchors with an embedment
of 4".
[Klingner]
The influence area of a single anchor is:

A 0 = 3 he = 3 (4.0) = 48 in 2
2
The influence area of two anchors with s1 equal to 4.5 inches is:
A n2 = s0 (s0 + s1 ) = 7.0 (7.0 + 4.5) = 80.5 in 2
g =
A n2
80.5
=
= 0.84
2 A0
2 48
MAY 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
13-39
Figure 13.3.2.4
Pullout Capacity and Embedment

During construction, the contractor will select a Mn/DOT Approved
Concrete Anchorage, which are listed at the Mn/DOT Office of Materials
Web site (http://www.mrr.dot.state.mn.us). The approved product must
have a factored tensile resistance Tna that is at least equal to the
factored tension force Tu determined in design:
a Tna = a Tn0 c e g Tu
then, Tn0
Tu
3.99
=
= 12.3 kips
a c e g
0.45 1.0 0.86 0.84
MAY 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
13-40
Assuming 1/2" of top surface deterioration, the minimum anchor

embedment depth L conc is:
Tn0
L conc
bond danchor
+ 0.5 in
12.3
=
+ 0.5 = 3.63
2 0.625
This is less than the assumed 4".
OK
At the job site, anchors are subjected to a proof load test. The proof load
will be the smaller of:
A limit based on yielding the steel rod:
2
2
2
(A b Fy ) = (0.31 36 ) = (11.16 ) = 7.4 kips
3
3
3
A limit based on the nominal adhesive capacity:
1
1
(Tn0 ) = (12.3) = 6.2 kips GOVERNS
2
2
J. Summary
An adhesive anchor detail with the following properties has adequate

capacity to support the Type M-1 railing: The anchor rods shall be 5/8"
diameter, Mn/DOT 3385 Type A anchor rods with a 4" minimum
embedment. The adhesive shall have a minimum ultimate pull-out
strength of 12.3 kips. The proof load for field testing shall be 6.2 kips.
K. Adhesive
Anchor Design for
Traffic Rails
The design of adhesive anchors for traffic rails is different than the design
of adhesive anchors for pedestrian rails shown above. A traffic rail
requires reinforcement or anchor rods to withstand a vehicle crash load
under the Extreme Event II limit state. For a metal rail on parapet
system or a concrete barrier where the design is based on successful
crash testing along with a yield line analysis, design the adhesive to
develop the strength of the reinforcement bar or anchor rod.
The Extreme Event II limit state has a load factor of 1.0 for the vehicle
crash load. Using the procedure in Article 13.3.2H of this manual to
determine a resistance factor results in the following:
1.0
(This value seems very low.)
a = CT =
= 0.25
FS
4
The factor of safety (FS) of 4 used by adhesive manufacturers is based
on a working load and not an extreme event load. Using the low crash
probability under an extreme event and the non-working load nature of
the crash load as a basis, Mn/DOT policy is to design for an FS of 1.33.
MAY 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
13-41
Then,
a =
CT
1.0
=
= 0.75
FS 1.33
(Use a = 0.75 for traffic rail only.)
Consider the following example:

A rail reconstruction project requires the use of #16 bars @ 12" spacing
to anchor a new F-rail to an existing deck with adhesive anchors.
Tu = A s Fy = 0.31 60 = 18.6 kips
a Tna = a Tn0 c e g Tu
Assuming that c e g = 1.0 :

Tn0
Tu 18.6
=
= 24.8 kips
a
0.75
Based on adhesive anchor product literature for a #16 bar anchored in

concrete with fc = 4 ksi, use an ultimate bond stress bond = 2.5 ksi.
Assuming 1/2" of top surface deterioration, the minimum required
embedment is:
Tn0
L conc =
bond danchor
+ 0.5
24.8
=
+ 0.5 = 5.55 in
2
.
5
0
.
625
Say 6" min. embedment
MAY 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
13-42
AUGUST 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
14-1
14. JOINTS AND

BEARINGS
Expansion joints and bearings provide mechanisms to accommodate

movements of bridges without generating excessive internal forces. This
section provides guidance on joint and bearing selection and the
movement and loads that must be used in their designs.
14.1 Bridge
Movements and
Fixity
To determine movements for bearings and joints, the point of fixity must
be established for the bridge or bridge segment. The point of fixity is the
neutral point on the bridge that does not move horizontally as the bridge
experiences temperature changes.
Use the following guidance
concerning bridge fixity:
1) For single span structures, fix the bearings at the low end of the
bridge.
2) For two-span structures, fix the bearings at the pier.
3) For structures with three or more spans, investigate the longitudinal
stiffness of the bridge. The longitudinal stiffness is a function of the
interaction between pier stiffnesses, bearing types and joint locations.
Consider the following:
a) The number and location of expansion joints is determined based
on a maximum joint opening of 4 inches at the ends of the bridge.
When joint openings exceed 4 inches, two options are available:
i) The preferred option is to provide additional joints at the piers
to split the superstructure into segments.
ii) On rare occasions, provide modular expansion joints at bridge
ends only.
b) Each bridge or bridge segment shall have fixed bearings at a
minimum of two piers to provide increased resistance to
longitudinal movements.
c) Provide fixed bearings at all tall pier locations. Tall or flexible
piers deflect prior to mobilizing the translational capacity of the
bearing.
d) A combination of fixed, expansion and limited expansion bearings
can be provided at the piers to accommodate the movements for
the bridge or bridge segments.
e) Based on the point of fixity of each segment, the maximum
movements can be determined for the design of joints and
bearings.
14.2 Expansion
Joints [14.5.3.2]
Minnesota bridges with parapet type abutments typically have strip seal
expansion joints at the abutments to isolate superstructure movements
from the abutments.
When the maximum joint openings at the
abutments exceed 4 inches additional joints are needed at piers or
modular joints are required at the abutments.
AUGUST 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
14-2
Do not use elastomeric compression seal expansion joints.
14.2.1 Thermal
Movements
[Table 3.4.1-1]
Design joint openings for movements associated with a temperature

range of 150F (-30F to 120F). Use a load factor for movement of 1.00.
(Note that this value differs from the LRFD Specification based on past
performance of joints in Minnesota.)
The coefficients of thermal expansion are:
Concrete:
6.0 10 6 per F
Steel:
6.5 10 6 per F
14.2.2 Strip Seal

Expansion Joints
For movements of 1/4 inch to 4 inches, use strip seal expansion devices.
Design joints to have a minimum opening of 1/2 inch between the steel
elements (extrusions) of the joint.
To provide a reasonably smooth roadway surface the maximum width of
expansion openings is limited to 4 inches (measured perpendicular to
joint) on roadway bridges. The maximum width for pedestrian bridges is
5 inches. Detail cover plates on sidewalks, medians, and pedestrian
bridges to cover the opening.
The standard strip seal device is a Type 4.0, which has a movement
capacity of 4 inches. Bridges on a horizontal curve or with a skew over
30 must accommodate racking or transverse movements as well. For
these situations use a Type 5.0 strip seal (5 inch capacity). Type 5.0
strip seals can also be used on pedestrian bridges.
For skews less than 30:
For expansion distance less than 150'-0", dimension opening at
2 inches at all temperatures.
For expansion distance greater than or equal to 150'-0", dimension
opening at 11/2 inches at 90F. Also determine and show dimension
at 45F, checking that the opening at -30F does not exceed 4 inches.
If so, reduce accordingly at 45F and 90F.
For skews greater than or equal to 30:
Dimension opening at 11/2 inches at 90F. Also determine and show
dimension at 45F, checking that the opening at -30F does not
exceed 31/2 inches. If so reduce accordingly at 45F and 90F.
AUGUST 2006
14.2.3 Modular
Expansion Joints
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
14-3
Modular expansion joints shall be used when dividing the bridge into
segments will not reduce the joint expansion to less than 4 inches.
Provide a joint setting schedule with modular joints that lists the opening
the joint should have at different construction temperatures. Show joint
openings for a temperature range from 45F to 90F in 15F increments.
Note that conventional modular joints are one-directional units. Bridges
with skews or horizontal curvature may require the use of swivel
modular joints.
These accommodate lateral movement as well as
longitudinal movements.
14.2.4 Expansion
Joint Detailing
Show the elevation at the top of the extrusion at crown break points,
gutter lines, and the start and end of curved sections. Dimension the
lengths for straight and curved portions of the expansion joint.
For skews up to 20, detail expansion joint as straight from edge of deck
to edge of deck. See Figure 14.2.4.1.
For skews greater than 20 and up to 50, detail expansion joint opening
as straight between the top inside edge of barriers. Kink the joint
opening at top inside edge of barriers so it is normal with outside edge of
deck. See Figure 14.2.4.1.
For skews greater than 50, curve the expansion joint ends. Use a 2'-0"
radius for new bridges. A minimum radius of 1'-6" is allowed on bridge
rehabilitation/reconstruction projects.
Terminate the curved section
6 inches from gutter line. See Figure 14.2.4.1.
Use bend-up details for all bridges with curbs or barriers. For bridges
with skewed joints, verify that the bend-up details in the barrier do not
project out of the front face of the rail.
Use snowplow protection for expansion joint devices (Bridge Details Part
II Fig. 5-397.628) when joints are skewed greater than 15 and less than
50.
AUGUST 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
14-4
Figure 14.2.4.1
Expansion Joint Details
14.3 Bearings
The purpose of a bridge bearing is to transmit loads from the

superstructure to the substructure while facilitating translation and
rotation. Four types of bearings are typically used:
1) Expansion Bearing:
Transfers vertical load
Allows lateral movement in two directions
Allows longitudinal rotation
2) Guided Expansion Bearing:
Transfers vertical load and lateral load in one direction
Allows lateral movement in one direction
3) Limited Expansion Bearing:
Transfers vertical load and lateral load
Allows limited lateral movement in one direction
4) Fixed Bearing:
Transfers vertical load and lateral load
Resists lateral movement
[4.7.4.4]
[3.10.9]
In order to meet seismic requirements, bridges that are greater than

600'-0" in length and are placed on poor soils shall have the piers tied to
the superstructure with fixed bearings or with limited displacement
expansion bearings. Check the width of pier caps and abutment seat
AUGUST 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
14-5
lengths to ensure the minimum support length requirements for Seismic

Performance Category 1 are satisfied.
14.3.1 Loads and

Movements
Design bearings for movements associated with a temperature range of

150F (-30F to 120F) and a base construction temperature of 45F.
Design elastomeric bearings for service loads and without Dynamic Load
Allowance (IM).
[14.6.1]
Uplift at bearings is not permitted. Bearings shall be checked for uplift

using the Strength I load combination with the minimum load factor for
dead load.
14.3.2 Bearing
Details
Identify the type of bearing used at each support location on the

superstructure framing plan.
For bearing components, the length is measured parallel to the centerline
of the beam and the width is measured perpendicular to the centerline of
the beam.
Check the dimensions of the bearing. The bearing shall have adequate
clearance to other bearings (pier locations), be consistent with the beam
end details (pier and abutment locations), and have adequate clearance
to vertical faces of supporting elements. For fixed bearings, provide a
minimum of 1 inch clear from the face of the bearing seat to the bearing
pad or masonry plate. For expansion bearings, increase this minimum
dimension to 3 inches.
Locate bearing anchor rods to permit field drilling of holes and provide
2 inch minimum clearance to reinforcement in bridge seat.
Bearings typically provide a modest amount of lateral restraint.
However, designers must consider whether or not additional restraint
needs to be provided. Typically, this additional restraint is provided by
reinforced concrete guide lugs in the substructure or slotted hole fixed
bearing assemblies adjacent to the center beam at expansion piers and
abutments for bridges on large skews or curves.
A 1 inch clear
dimension must be provided between elements for either of these
restraint methods. Provide additional restraint for pedestrian bridges.
The service life of bearings is less than the anticipated service life of a
bridge.
To simplify future maintenance operations and potential
AUGUST 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
14-6
replacement, provide adequate clearance for the installation of jacks (at

least 6 inches) and also provide a jacking load path. The load path may
involve properly designed and detailed diaphragms or a suitable
superstructure element.
[14.8.2]
When the slope of steel beam or plate girder superstructures exceeds

3%, incorporate tapered sole plates into the bearings. Exceptions to this
include bearings at integral abutments.
For proper load distribution, set masonry plates on a plain elastomeric
pad, a grout bed, sheet lead or a seat that has been ground flat.
14.3.3 Elastomeric
Bearings
Use of elastomeric bearings is preferred over other types of bearings.

Fixed and expansion elastomeric bearing types are used most frequently.
Mn/DOTs fixed elastomeric bearing consists of a plain elastomeric pad
with a curved plate to allow rotation, and anchor rods for fixity. The
expansion elastomeric bearing consists of a steel reinforced elastomeric
pad with a curved plate to allow rotation. See Details B310, B311, B354,
and B355.
14.3.3.1 Design
Use the tables found in Article 14.7 of this manual whenever possible for
consistency and economy among bearing designs.
Elastomeric bearings are to be designed using Method A of the AASHTO
LRFD Specifications.
Designs shall be based on an elastomer with a durometer hardness of 55.
The minimum shear modulus (G) for this material is 115 psi. The
maximum shear modulus is 165 psi.
The minimum size bearing pad for prestressed concrete beams is a
12" by 24" pad.
Except for special designs, use steel with a yield strength Fy equal to
36 ksi for all bearing assembly plates.
For Mn/DOT bridges with curved plate bearings, rotations need not be
considered in the design.
For maximum compressive stress checks, use the minimum shear
modulus value.
AUGUST 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
14-7
Holes are not permitted in elastomeric bearings.
14.3.3.1.1 Size and

Stability
The shape factor, S, is limited to the following for plain pads and internal
elastomeric laminates:
5.0 S 10.0
For fixed bearings use 1/2 inch or 3/4 inch thickness plain pads. For
expansion bearings, use 3/8 inch, 1/2 inch, or 3/4 inch thickness internal
laminates with 1/8 inch thick steel reinforcing plates and 1/4 thick cover
layers.
Minimum dimensions for elastomeric bearings shall be rounded to the
nearest 2 inch increment. For prestressed beams the minimum length
(A) is 12 inches and the minimum width (B) is 24 inches. For steel
beams, the minimum length (A) is 8 inches. The width (B) shall not be
less than the bottom flange width and not more than 2 inches greater
than the bottom flange width for steel beams.
Based on the past performance of elastomeric bearings, Mn/DOT places a
limit on the plan aspect ratio of a bearing. The length (A) is limited by
the following equation:
B 2.5 A
[14.7.6.3.6]
Additionally, the total elastomer thickness for the bearing ( hrt ) must be
no more than 1/3 of the bearing pad length and width:
hrt
14.3.3.2 Fixed
Bearings
A
B
and
3
3
Design fixed elastomeric bearings for a maximum compressive stress of

0.880 ksi. This includes a 10% increase for fixity.
Provide transverse fixity for 2/3 of beams at fixed piers or fixed
abutments for widths along skew greater than 70'-0".
AUGUST 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
14-8
14.3.3.3 Expansion
Bearings
Expansion elastomeric bearings are reinforced and shall be designed for a

maximum compressive stress of 1.00 ksi or less.
[14.7.6.3.4]
[Table 3.4.1-1]
The total height or thickness of elastomer ( hrt ) must be greater than

twice the maximum design movement. The LRFD Specification lists a
load factor of 1.2 to be used for thermal movement calculations.
However, based on past performance of bearings, use a load factor of 1.3
with half the design temperature range (75F) when computing
movement s for the height check.
14.3.3.3.1
Minimum
Compressive Load
[14.7.6.4]
LRFD 14.7.6.4 requires that elastomeric bearings be secured against

horizontal movement when 1/5 of the minimum vertical load is less than
the factored horizontal shear force Hu generated in the bearing due to
temperature movement.
[14.6.3.1]
Hu = G A pad
Therefore,
u
hrt
Pmin
G A pad u
5
hrt
For the minimum compressive load check, use the maximum shear
modulus value and a load factor of 1.0 with half the design temperature
range (75F) to calculate the horizontal force at the bearing. The LRFD
Specification lists a load factor of 1.2 for this calculation. However,
based on past performance of bearings, use a load factor of 1.0. Also,
we know that A pad = A B .
Then the minimum required compressive load is:

Reqd. Pmin 5 0.165 A B
which, becomes Reqd. Pmin
1.0 u
hrt
0.825 A B u
hrt
If the check is not satisfied, revise the number and/or thickness of the
laminates as needed.
If the requirement still cannot be met, the
standard curved plate expansion bearing assemblies (B318 and B355)
contain knock-off weld studs welded to the bearing plate. The studs can
be considered as a mechanism that secures the pads.
AUGUST 2006
14.3.4 Pot
Bearings
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
14-9
Use pot or disk bearings where the loads are too high or the movements
and rotations are too large to be readily accommodated with elastomeric
bearings. See Details B312, B313, B314, B315, and B316.
To reduce the possibility of generating large lateral forces in wide bridges
supported on pot bearings, do not use guided or fixed bearings for beam
lines outside of the center 45 feet of the bridge (distance measured along
the substructure).
All applicable design loads and movements for pot bearings must be
provided in the contract documents. Due to a variety of preferences
among pot bearing fabricators, explicit details are not provided in the
plans. Instead, the fabricator determines the sizes of all of the bearing
components, from the masonry plate to the sole plate. As a guide, the
following equation may be used to estimate the height (rounded to the
nearest 1/4 inch) of the assembly for design:
Height (inches) = 6.5 + Load (kips ) / 400
Include the following note on the appropriate substructure sheets when

pot bearings are used:
Final construction elevations for bridge seats shall be determined
based on the actual height of pot bearing assemblies furnished by the
Contractor. Any required adjustment of seat elevations shall be made
by the Contractor at no cost to Mn/DOT.
Fixed pot bearings provide rotation, but no movement.
Guided expansion pot bearings allow for free movement in one direction
and provide rotational capacity. However, movement perpendicular to
the free movement direction is restrained. For curved bridges, assume
the free movement direction to be along a chord connecting the ends of
the beam. Guide bars must resist a minimum of 10% of the vertical load
applied to the bearing.
Expansion pot bearings provide for rotation and unguided movement in
all horizontal directions.
For computation of movement for design of pot bearings, use a load
factor of 1.2.
AUGUST 2006
14.3.5 Other Types
of Bearings
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
14-10
Steel Bearings
This type of bearing does not contain elastomeric components to
accommodate horizontal movement. Rather, horizontal movement takes
place at the interface of a machined masonry plate and a lubricated
bronze plate. Bridge Details Part I B351, B352, and B353 detail fixed,
expansion, and guided expansion steel bearings respectively. They have
all been archived, but can be retrieved if necessary for a repair plan.
Note that these bearings are for repair and replacement only and are not
for new construction.
Modify the standard bearings as necessary to accommodate unusually

wide flanges or to provide movement capacities greater than those
permitted with the standard details.
Check the clearances on the guide bars for curved bridges.
To reduce the possibility of generating large lateral forces in wide bridges
supported on steel bearings, do not use guided or fixed bearings for
beam lines outside of the center 45'-0" of the bridge (distance measured
along the substructure).
Bearings for Railroad Bridges
Due to the extremely large loads associated with railroad bridges,
spherical bearings, rocker bearings or pot bearings are normally required.
Rocker bearings may be considered for other applications where there is
a combination of large load and large movement.
14.4 Curved Plate

Design
Width
For prestressed concrete beams, set the width (H) equal to the bearing
pad width (B) plus 2 inches. The width may change slightly (2 inches to
4 inches) for special designs. For steel beams, set the width equal to the
bearing pad width (B).
Thickness
Use allowable stress design for curved plate thickness determination.
Design for maximum allowable bending stress given in Standard
Specifications Table 10.32.1A:
Allowable fs = 0.55 Fy
The all around weld, together with the friction between plates, causes the
curved plate and bearing plate to act compositely.
Therefore, the
thickness for design can be considered to include the curved plate
AUGUST 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
14-11
thickness plus the bearing plate thickness. The minimum thickness for
curved plates is 11/4 inches. When greater thickness is required, increase
plate thickness in 1/4 inch increments.
Length
The minimum length (G) for the curved plate is 41/2 inches. The next
permitted length is 6 inches, after which the length may be increased by
increments of 2 inches up to a maximum of 12 inches. If the bearing
plate thickness exceeds 2 inches, increase the length of the curved plate
to reduce the length of the cantilever for the bearing plate design.
Increase the curved plate length until the bearing plate thickness alone
and the composite plate thickness are approximately equal.
Radius
The radius of curved plates is to be no less than 16 inches. Check
contact stresses to make sure that an adequate radius is provided.
Based on past satisfactory performance of curved plate bearing
assemblies, use LRFD Equations C14.7.1.4-1 and C14.7.1.4-2 for
determination of curved plate radius. If the resulting radius exceeds
24 inches, a special design must be completed using LRFD Equation
14.7.1.4-1 and steel with a yield strength Fy equal to 50 ksi.
14.5 Bearing Plate

Design
Width
For prestressed concrete beams, set the width (E) equal to the curved
plate width (H) plus 1 inch for expansion bearings. For fixed bearings,
set the width (E) equal to the beam bottom flange width plus 8 inches.
For steel beams, set the width (E) equal to the curved plate width (B)
plus 2 inches for expansion bearings and plus 10 inches for fixed
bearings.
Length
Set the length of the bearing plate (C) 2 inches larger than the bearing
pad length (A).
Thickness
Use allowable stress design for bearing plate thickness determination.
AUGUST 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
14-12
The minimum thickness for bearing plates is 11/2 inches. When greater
thickness is required, increase plate thickness in 1/4 inch increments.
14.6 Sole Plate

Design (Steel
Beams)
Width
Set the width of the sole plate 2 inches larger than the curved plate width
(B). The width cannot be equal to the beam flange width because of the
fillet weld used to attach the sole plate to the flange. Increase the sole
plate width by 1 inch if this occurs.
Length
The minimum length is 6 inches. Also, the length shall not be less than
the curved plate length (G).
Thickness
Use allowable stress design for sole plate thickness determination.
The minimum sole plate thickness is 11/4 inches. When greater thickness
is required, increase plate thickness in 1/8 inch increments.
14.7 Tables
The following tables contain standard curved plate bearing designs for
prestressed concrete and steel beam superstructures based on the
guidance given in this manual.
Table 14.7.1
Fixed Curved Plate Bearing Assembly for
Prestressed Concrete I-Beams (B310)
Table 14.7.2
Expansion Curved Plate Bearing Assembly for
Table 14.7.3
Steel Beams (B354)
Table 14.7.4
Expansion Curved Plate Bearing Assembly for
Steel Beams (B355)
Table 14.7.5
Elastomeric Bearing Pad thickness for Expansion
Bearings
The tables should be used whenever possible to increase consistency and
economy among bearing designs. When actual calculated loads are
greater than the maximum loads given in the table, two options are
available to designers:
AUGUST 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
14-13
1) Complete a special elastomeric bearing design. Use LRFD Equation

14.7.1.4-1 for determination of curved plate radius. Also, use steel
with a yield strength equal to 50 ksi for the curved plate. Modify the
B-Detail by specifying that the curved plate shall comply with Mn/DOT
Spec. 3310.
2) Use a pot bearing.
AUGUST 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
14-14
253
12
24
295
14
337
16
380
18
422
20
Curved Plate Size
(in)
(in)
C
1
/2
8.0
8.8
(in)
Bearing Plate Size
Minimum Radius
Shape Factor
(in)
Plain Pad
Bearing
Pad Size
Thickness (in)
Maximum
DL + LL (kips)
Table 14.7.1
1 /2
4 /2
26
1 /4
16
16
1 /4
14
9.6
18
/4
6.9
20
21/4
7.3
22
20
34" for all M series I-beams

38" for all MN series I-beams.
264
12
24
336
14
384
16
401
c
20
Curved Plate Size
(in)
(in)
(in)
Shape Factor
Laminates c
Bearing Plate Size
Minimum Radius
Max. Number of
(in)
Laminate
Bearing
Pad Size
Thickness (in)
Maximum
DL + LL (kips)
Table 14.7.2
Expansion Curved Plate Bearing Assembly
for Prestressed Concrete I-Beams (B311)
/2
8.0
14
27
1 /2
4 /2
26
1 /4
16
8.8
16
9.6
18
18
/4
7.3
22
2 /4
See Table 14.7.5 for determination of required number of laminates.
98
123
147
172
112
140
168
197
225
126
158
190
221
253
285
140
176
211
246
281
316
352
Max.
Width
(in)
14
16
18
20
Min.
Width
(in)
12
14
16
18
Max.
(kips)
LL
DL +
Beam
Flange
Beam
Flange
16
18
16
8
20
18
8
10.0
9.5
8.9
8.2
7.5
6.7
5.7
9.0
8.5
7.9
7.2
6.4
5.5
8.0
7.5
6.9
6.2
5.3
7.0
6.5
5.8
5.1
Factor
Shape
22
20
18
16
14
12
10
20
18
16
14
12
10
18
16
14
12
10
16
14
12
10
30
28
26
24
Size (in)
Bearing Plate
2 /4
6
2
1 /4
11/2
41/2
2 /4
6
2
1 /4
41/2
11/2
13/4
2
4 /2
1 /2
13/4
1
4 /2
1 /2
20
18
16
14
Size (in)
Curved Plate
11/4
11/4
1 /4
1 /4
22
18
16
19
16
17
16
16
(in)
Radius
Min.
Length
22
20
18
16
Width
Size (in)
Sole Plate
11/4
11/4
1 /4
11/4
Thick.
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
20
18
16
14
12
10
16
14
/2
12
10
14
/2
12
10
/2
14
1
12
10
/2
14
(in)
Thick.
Pad
Plain
Size (in)
Bearing Pad
Table 14.7.3 Fixed Curved Plate Bearing Assembly for Steel Beams (B354)
AUGUST 2006
14-15

24
22
10
193
232
271
309
348
387
418
211
253
295
337
380
422
464
228
274
320
366
411
457
503
Max.
Width
(in)
22
24
26
Width
(in)
20
22
24
(kips)
LL
22
20
18
16
14
/4
/2
12
/8
26
10
22
20
/4
/2
/4
18
16
14
12
20
18
16
14
/2
(in)
Thick.
Pad
Plain
22
10
12
Size (in)
Bearing Pad
Min.
Max.
DL +
Beam
Flange
Beam
Flange
7.9
7.5
7.1
9.9
9.1
8.2
9.6
7.7
7.3
6.9
9.6
8.8
8.0
7.1
7.3
7.0
9.9
9.3
8.6
7.8
6.9
Factor
Shape
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
36
34
32
Size (in)
Bearing Plate
2 /4
2 /4
1 /4
4 /2
1 /2
2 /4
21/4
13/4
2
11/2
41/2
2 /4
2 /4
1 /4
4 /2
1 /2
26
24
22
Size (in)
Curved Plate
1 /4
11/4
1 /4
23
19
16
24
20
16
24
21
17
16
(in)
Radius
Min.
Table 14.7.3 (Cont.) Fixed Curved Plate Bearing Assembly for Steel Beams (B354)
Length
28
26
24
Width
Size (in)
Sole Plate
1 /4
11/4
11/4
Thick.
AUGUST 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
14-16

18
16
8
87
125
166
196
104
150
192
224
235
122
177
216
228
280
322
140
200
240
265
320
360
Max.
Width
(in)
14
16
18
20
Width
(in)
12
14
16
18
16
18
16
14
12
10
/2
/8
20
16
18
/2
/8
/2
14
12
10
14
12
10
11
11
11
11
14
/8
12
10
14
Lamin-
(in)
ates c
of
Thick.
/8
Max.
Laminate Number
9.5
8.9
8.2
10.0
8.9
7.6
9.0
8.5
7.9
9.6
8.6
7.4
8.0
10.0
9.1
8.2
7.1
9.3
8.6
7.8
6.8
Factor
Shape
20
18
16
14
12
10
20
18
16
14
12
10
18
16
14
12
10
16
14
12
10
22
20
18
16
Size (in)
Bearing Plate
2 /2
11/2
41/2
2 /2
41/2
4 /2
4 /2
11/2
1 /2
1 /2
20
18
16
14
Size (in)
Curved Plate
11/4
11/4
1 /4
1 /4
23
18
16
24
19
16
18
16
18
16
(in)
Radius
Min.
Length
11/4
22
11/4
20
1 /4
18
11/4
Thick.
16
Length
Size (in)
Sole Plate
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
c See Table 14.7.5 for determination of required number of laminates.
(kips)
LL
Size (in)
Bearing Pad
Min.
DL +
Max.
Beam
Flange
Beam
Flange
Table 14.7.4 Expansion Curved Plate Bearing Assembly for Steel Beams (B355)
AUGUST 2006
14-17
220
235
303
352
396
408
240
264
336
384
401
464
260
294
364
416
450
513
Max.
Width
(in)
22
24
26
Min.
Width
(in)
20
22
24
/8
/2
3
1
22
10
Lamin-
(in)
/8
/2
3
1
24
22
10
22
20
16
14
12
/2
26
10
/8
22
20
16
14
12
18
16
14
11
ates c
of
Thick.
12
Max.
Laminate Number
Size (in)
Bearing Pad
7.9
7.5
9.9
9.1
8.2
9.6
7.7
7.3
9.6
8.8
8.0
9.4
7.3
9.9
9.3
8.6
7.8
9.2
Factor
Shape
c See Table 14.7.5 for determination of required number of laminates.
(kips)
LL
DL +
Max.
Beam
Flange
Beam
Flange
24
22
18
16
14
12
24
22
18
16
14
12
24
20
18
16
14
12
28
26
24
Size (in)
Bearing Plate
6
8
2 /4
23/4
4 /2
1 /2
23/4
2 /4
4 /2
1 /2
23/4
1
2 /2
4 /2
1 /2
26
24
22
Size (in)
Curved Plate
1 /4
1 /4
1 /4
24
19
16
24
18
17
16
23
22
17
16
(in)
Radius
Min.
Table 14.7.4 (Cont.) Expansion Curved Plate Bearing Assembly for Steel Beams (B355)
Length
28
26
24
Width
Size (in)
Sole Plate
1 /4
1 /4
11/4
Thick.
AUGUST 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
14-18
AUGUST 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
14-19
Table 14.7.5
Elastomeric Bearing Pad Thickness for Expansion Bearings c
D
Number of
(in) d
Laminates
1 /8
5
/8" Interior
Laminates
/2" Interior
Laminates
/4" Interior
Laminates
Movement
(in) d
(in) e
/8
/16
1 /4
2 /8
13
2 /8
31/8
23/8
13/16
35/8
1 /8
/8
/16
23/4
13/8
4 /8
3 /8
19/16
45/8
31/2
13/4
51/8
37/8
115/16
5 /8
10
4 /4
21/8
61/8
11
45/8
25/16
11/4
/2
1 /8
/4
2 /2
31/8
21/2
11/4
33/4
1 /2
11/2
4 /8
3 /2
13/4
5 /8
4 /2
21/4
6 /4
21/2
67/8
10
51/2
23/4
7 /2
Maximum
Thickness, hrt
1 /8
Total Elastomer
11
1 /2
2 /8
31/4
23/4
13/8
41/8
31/2
13/4
4 /4
21/8
57/8
21/2
63/4
1 /4
3
5
/8
53/4
27/8
7 /8
6 /2
31/4
81/2
71/4
35/8
c Table is based on requirements of AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications Section 14.7.6.3.4: hrt 2 s . Engineer
must also check that the minimum compressive load requirement (discussed in Article 14.3.3.1.2) is satisfied.
Specifically:
u
A B
Pmin 0.825
h
rt
where Pmin is the minimum factored load ( 0.9 DC + 1.75 LL min ) and u is the movement of the bearing pad from
the undeformed state using a 75F temperature change with a 1.0 load factor.
d
hrt includes interior laminates plus 1/4" cover layers. Pad thickness D includes hrt and 1/8" steel reinforcement
plates.
e Maximum movement is the movement of the bearing pad from the undeformed state to the point of maximum
deformation. Use a 75F temperature change with a 1.3 load factor for calculation of maximum movement.
AUGUST 2006
14.8 Design
Examples
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
14-20
Two design examples follow. The first is a fixed elastomeric bearing. The
second is an expansion elastomeric bearing.
AUGUST 2006
14.8.1 Fixed
Elastomeric
Bearing Design
Example
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
14-21
This example is a continuation of the prestressed girder design example

found in Section 5.7.2. The bearing used in this example is based on
Bridge Details Part I B310. The elastomeric bearing pad is designed
using Method A (LRFD 14.7.6). Figure 14.8.1.1 shows the bearing
components.
The length, width, and thickness labels used for the
different elements of the bearing are consistent with Detail B310. See
Figure 14.8.1.4.
Figure 14.8.1.1
With the maximum reaction calculated, the bearing design should be

selected from the standard tables found in Section 14.7. If a standard
design will not work due to unusual loads or geometric constraints, a
custom design will be required.
This example will outline the procedure to custom design a fixed
elastomeric bearing. First, design the elastomeric pad. Next determine
the steel plate requirements for the rest of the bearing assembly.
AUGUST 2006
A. Design
Elastomeric
Bearing Pad
[14.7.6]
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
14-22
Unfactored reactions from Table 5.7.2.4 of the prestressed beam design

example are used as the design loads for this example. They are:
Dead Load = Pdl = 146 kips
Maximum Live Load = Pllmax = 37 +
79
1.33
= 96.4 kips
(Does not include dynamic load

allowance; IM)
Minimum Live Load = Pllmin = 0 kips
Maximum Ps = Pdl + Pllmax = 242.4 kips at the service limit state

Minimum Pu = 0.9 Pdl + 1.75 Pllmin = 0.9 146 + 1.75 0 = 131.4 kips at
the strength limit state. Therefore, there is no uplift.
For prestressed beams, the minimum bearing pad width (B) is 24 inches.
[14.7.6.3.2]
The allowable compressive stress for plain pads is 0.80 ksi.

The
allowable is increased by 10% for a fixed bearing because shear
deformation is prevented.
Allowable s = 1.10 0.80 = 0.88 ksi
Using the vertical load, the allowable compressive stress, and width (B)
of the bearing pad, a trial length (A) can be found.
A=
Ps
242.4
=
= 11.48 in
0.88 B 0.88 24
Try a bearing pad with the following dimensions:

A = 12 in, B = 24 in, and thickness hrt = 0.50 in
Then the maximum service load stress under total load is:
Actual s =
Ps
242.4
=
= 0.842 ksi < 0.880 ksi
A B 12 24
OK
AUGUST 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
14-23
There are two geometric checks on the bearing pad to ensure that it has
good proportions. First, in plan, the length of the long side can be no
more the 2.5 times the length of the short side. Second, the height of
the elastomeric portion can be no more than 1/3 the length of the short
side of the pad.
2.5 A = 2.5 12 = 30 in 24 in
[14.7.6.3.6]
A 12
=
= 4 in > 0.50 in = hrt
3
3
OK
OK
Mn/DOT specifies a range of permissible values for the shape factor (S).
5.0 S 10.0
[14.7.5.1]
Actual S =
A B
12 24
=
= 8.0
2 (A + B) hrt
2 (12 + 24) 0.50
5.0 S = 8.0 10.0
B. Curved Plate
Design
OK
Set the curved plate width 2 inches wider than the bearing pad.
H = B + 2 = 24 + 2 = 26 in
The all around weld, together with the friction between plates, causes the
curved plate and bearing plate to act compositely.
Therefore, the
thickness for design can be considered to include the curved plate
thickness plus the bearing plate thickness.
Begin by checking the thickness for a curved composite plate with a
length of 4.5 inches. If the thickness of the bearing plate is more than
2 inches, increase the length of the curved plate until the bearing plate
thickness and composite plate thickness are approximately equal. After
4.5 inches, try 6 inches. If 6 inches does not work, increase length by
increments of 2 inches thereafter.
Curved Plate length = G = 4.5 in
AUGUST 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
14-24
The radius of the contact surface is the first parameter to determine for
the curved plate. The radius of the curved plate is a function of the yield
strength of the steel and the load intensity.
The contact length of the sole plate with the curved plate is equal to the
sole plate width minus the chamfers at each side, the pintles, and the
associated bevels around each of the pintles. See Figure 14.8.1.2.
Figure 14.8.1.2
Contact length L sp is equal to

L sp = 26 2 (0.125) 2 (0.75) 2 (2.25) = 19.75 in
[14.7.1.4]

assemblies, the minimum radius permitted is determined with LRFD
Equation C14.7.1.4-1 and C14.7.1.4-2. Start by assuming radius is
12.5 inches or less, so use the first equation. Rearranging the equation
to solve for d , and dividing by 2 (to compute a radius) results in the
following:
R min
P
242.4
10 s
10
L sp
19.75
10 p
= 8.9 in < 12.5 in

=
=
=
0.6 (Fy 13) 0.6 (Fy 13) 0.6 (36 13)
Assumption was correct.
AUGUST 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
14-25
The radius of curved plates is to be no less than 16 inches. Therefore,

specify the minimum radius for the curved plate to be 16 inches.
The required thickness of the curved composite plate is based on a
simple model in which a uniform pressure is applied to the bottom of the
plate and the reaction is a line load. See Figure 14.8.1.3.
Figure 14.8.1.3
Pressure on the composite plate is:

cp =
Ps
242.4
=
= 2.07 ksi
G H 4.5 26
Maximum moment on the composite plate on a 1 inch wide strip is:

Mcp = cp
G G
4.5 4.5
= 2.07
= 5.24 kip-in/in width

2 4
2
4
The required curved composite plate thickness is determined by finding

the thickness of plate that has sufficient section modulus to carry the
moment. (i.e., = M / S , rearranged to S = M / ). Past designs based on
allowable stress have performed well. Size the plate with the maximum
AUGUST 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
14-26
allowable bending stress permitted in the Standard Specifications

[Table 10.32.1A].
fs = 0.55 Fy = 0.55 36 = 19.8 ksi
The required section modulus is:

Sreq =
Mcp
fs
5.24
= 0.265 in 3
19.8
Solving for thickness, J

Minimum J = 6 Sreq = 1.26 in 11/4 in
This is the same as the standard curved plate thickness of 11/4 inches, so
in this case composite action is not needed.
Use curved plate with thickness J = 11/4 inches.
C. Bearing Plate
Design
Per Detail B310, the length (C) is set at 2 inches longer than the pad
length. This provides room for the keeper studs to be attached to the
bottom of the bearing plate. The width (E) is set 8 inches greater than
the beam bottom flange width. This provides room on each side for the
anchor rods.
E = b f + 8 = 26 + 8 = 34 in
C = A + 2 = 12 + 2 = 14 in
The bearing plate is assumed to act as a cantilever (See Figure 14.8.1.3)

that carries the bearing pad pressure back to the curved plate. The
cantilever length is half the difference in length between the bearing pad
and the curved plate.
L cr =
A G 12 4.5
= 3.75 in
2 2
2
2
Mbp = s
L cr
2
= 0.842
3.752
2
AUGUST 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
14-27
Use the same procedure that was used to arrive at a curved plate
thickness.
Note that the minimum thickness for bearing plates is
1
1 /2 inches.
Sreq =
Freq =
Mbp
fs
5.92
= 0.299 in 3
19.8
6 Sreq =
6 0.299 = 1.34 in
Use bearing plate with thickness F = 11/2 inches.

D. Anchor
Rods/Pintles
The standard 11/2 inch anchor rods and pintles with Detail B310 have a
service load capacity of 70 kips.
For many projects, such as the
superstructure assumed for this design example, the capacity of the
anchor rods and pintles will be adequate by inspection. For projects
where two or more piers are fixed or where significant longitudinal forces
are anticipated, evaluate the capacity of the anchor rods and pintles.
The anchor rod offset dimension (M) is to be calculated such that the
anchor rods are located along the beam centerline of bearing. In this
case, the skew is zero, so M = 0 inches.
The bearing design is summarized in Figure 14.8.1.4.
AUGUST 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 14.8.1.4
14-28
AUGUST 2006
14.8.2 Expansion
Elastomeric
Bearing Design
Example
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
14-29
This example illustrates the design of an expansion curved plate

elastomeric bearing. It is a continuation of the steel plate girder design
example found in Section 6.9. The example is based on Bridge Details
Part I, B355. The elastomeric bearing pad is designed using Method A
[LRFD 14.7.6]. Figure 14.8.2.1 labels the primary components for this
type of bearing. The length, width, and thickness variables for the
different components are consistent with Detail B355.
See Figure
14.8.2.4.
Figure 14.8.2.1
With the maximum reaction calculated, the bearing design should be

selected from standard bearing tables in Section 14.7. If a standard
design will not work due to unusual loads or geometric constraints, a
custom design will be required.
AUGUST 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
14-30
This example will outline the procedure to custom design an expansion

elastomeric bearing. First determine the size of the pad required. Next
determine the steel plate requirements for the rest of the assembly.
Two movements are accommodated with this type of bearing, rotation
and horizontal translation. The rotation takes place at the interface
between the sole plate and the curved plate. The horizontal translation
takes place in the reinforced elastomeric bearing pad.
A. Design
Reinforced
Elastomeric
Bearing Pad
The bearing pad needs sufficient plan area to ensure that compression
stresses are below the limit.
It also needs sufficient thickness to
accommodate the horizontal translation.
Begin by determining the
design movements and loads for the bearing.
Design Movements
The plate girder design example is for a two-span bridge with equal
spans of 152'-0".
Fixity is assumed at the middle of the bridge. The bearing for this design
example is assumed to be located at one of the abutments.
Expansion length = L exp = 152 ft

[6.4.1]
Coefficient of thermal expansion for steel = steel = 0.0000065

Design temperatures:
Base Construction Temperature:
Low:
Tlow = 30 F
High:
Fall:
Tfall = Tconstr Tlow = 75 F
Rise:
Trise = Thigh Tconstr = 75 F
Tconstr = 45 F
Thigh = 120 F
Movement for minimum compressive stress (Load Factor = 1.0 )

u = 1.0 Tfall steel L exp = 1.0 75 0.0000065 152 12 = 0.89 in
Movement for shear deflection (Load Factor = 1.3 )

s = 1.3 Tfall steel L exp = 1.3 u = 1.3 0.89 = 1.16 in
AUGUST 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
14-31
The material properties for 55 durometer elastomer can be found by

interpolating between the values for 50 and 60 durometer materials. The
minimum shear modulus is found to be 0.115 ksi and the maximum is
0.165 ksi.
Design Loads
The design loads for the bearing are obtained from the steel plate girder
design example. They are as follows:
Dead load = Pdl = 117 kips

Maximum live load = Pllmax = 108 kips
Minimum live load = Pllmin = 15 kips
The bearing is sized with service limit state loads

Maximum Ps = Pdl + Pll = 117 + 108 = 225 kips
The minimum compressive load check is made with Strength I limit state
loads
Minimum Pu = 0.9 Pdl + 1.75 Pllmin = 0.9 117 + 1.75 ( 15) = 79.1 kips
Size Elastomeric Bearing Pad

Begin by sizing the elastomeric pad. The total thickness of elastomer
must be at least twice the design movement. The movement with the
1.3 multiplier is used for this check.
[Eq. 14.7.6.3.4-1]
Minimum hrt = 2 s = 2 1.16 = 2.32 in
Thickness of cover elastomer laminate, hcover = 0.25 in

Try an internal elastomer laminate thickness, hri = 0.375 in
Thickness of steel plates, hs = 0.125 in
Determine the number of internal laminates, n, required:
n=
Min. hrt 2 hcover

2.32 2 0.25
=
= 4.85
hri
0.375
Use n = 5
AUGUST 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
14-32
Number of steel plates, ns = n + 1 = 6

Total elastomer thickness:
hrt = 2 (hcover ) + n (hri ) = 2 (0.25) + 5 (0.375) = 2.375 in
Height of reinforced elastomeric pad, D = hrt + ns hs = 3.125 in

For preliminary pad sizing, assume the pad allowable compression is
1.0 ksi. Round the pad width and length dimensions to even inch
dimensions.
Try a pad width, B = 20 in
Solve for the minimum pad length (A):
A min =
Max. Ps
225
=
= 11.25 in
1.0 B
1.0 20
Try a pad length, A = 12 in

Shape Factor Check
Check the shape factor of the internal laminate:
S=
A B
12 20
=
= 10.0
2 (A + B ) hri
2 (12 + 20) 0.375
5.0 S = 10.0 10.0
OK
Compute the shape for the cover layers for later use in the deflection
computations.
S=
A B
12 20
=
= 15.0
2 (A + B ) hri
2 (12 + 20) 0.25
Pad Dimensional Checks

Check that the bearing satisfies aspect ratio checks.
The total
1
elastomeric thickness must be less than /3 the length of the pad's
shortest side.
[14.7.6.3.6]
A 12
=
= 4 in > 2.375 in
3
3
OK
AUGUST 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
14-33
Also check that maximum pad dimension (B) is no greater than 2.5 times
the smallest pad dimension (A):
2.5 A = 2.5 12 = 30 in > 20 in
[14.7.6.3.2]
OK
Maximum Compressive Stress Check

Now check the maximum compressive stress in the pad. Use the
minimum shear modulus for this computation ( Gmin = 0.115 ksi).
Maximum s = 1.0 Gmin S = 1.15 ksi > 1.0 ksi
Use 1.0 ksi
Using s = 1.0 ksi results in a maximum load for the bearing of:
Maximum Ps = s A B = 1.0 12 20 = 240 kips > 225 kips
[14.7.6.3.3]
[14.7.5.3.3]
OK
Compressive Deflection
To ensure that joints and appurtenances perform properly, the vertical
deflection in elastomeric bearings is checked. Due to the nonlinear
behavior of the elastomer, the movement associated with live load is
computed by subtracting the dead load deflection from the total load
deflection.
Begin by determining the average vertical compressive stress in the

bearings under dead load alone and under total load.
Pdl
117
=
= 0.488 ksi
A B 12 20
P
225
tl = tl =
= 0.938 ksi
A B 12 20
dl =
Using the stress strain figures in the commentary to Article 14.7.5.3.3,

one can estimate the strain in the interior laminates and the cover layers.
To arrive at strain values for 55 durometer bearings, the strains from the
50 durometer figure and the 60 durometer figure are averaged.
AUGUST 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Laminate
Interior
Cover
14-34
Load
Stress
(ksi)
50
durometer
Strain
60
durometer
Strain
Average
Strain
()
Dead Load
10
0.488
2.4%
2.1%
2.3%
Total Load
10
0.938
4.1%
3.6%
3.9%
Dead Load
15
0.488
2.1%
1.9%
2.0%
Total Load
15
0.938
3.4%
3.1%
3.3%
The initial compressive deflection of a single interior laminate under total

load is:
[14.7.6.3.3]
tlhri = hri ri = hri 0.039 < hri 0.07
OK
With five interior laminates and two cover layers the deflection under
total load is:
tl = 5 hri ri + 2 hcover cover
= 5 0.375 0.039 + 2 0.25 0.033 = 0.090 in
The deflection under dead load is:

dl = 5 hri ri + 2 hcover cover
= 5 0.375 0.023 + 2 0.25 0.020 = 0.053 in
[Table 14.7.5.2-1]
The deflection due to creep is:

cr = 0.30 dl = 0.30 0.053 = 0.016 in
[C14.7.5.3.3]
The difference between the two deflections is the estimated live load
deflection. The total deflection due to live load plus creep should be no
greater than 1/8 inch.
ll = tl dl = 0.090 0.053 = 0.037 in
ll + cr = 0.037 + 0.016 = 0.053 in < 0.125 in
OK
AUGUST 2006
[14.7.6.4]
[14.6.3.1]
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN

Minimum Compressive Load Check
Using the equation derived in Article 14.3.3.1.2 of this manual:
Req'd. Pmin =
=
0.825 A B u
hrt
0.825 12 20 0.89
= 74.2 kips
2.375
Actual Min. Pu = 79.1 kips > 74.2 kips
[14.7.5.3.7]
14-35
OK
Check Service and Fatigue of Steel Plates

Check the service and fatigue limit states for the steel plates.
service limit state the following equation must be satisfied:
hs
At the
3 hmax s
Fy
The yield strength of the steel plates ( Fy ) is 36 ksi.

hmax = hri = 0.375 in
s =
Ps
225
=
= 0.938 ksi
A B 12 20
Min. hs =
3 hmax s
3 0.375 0.938
=
= 0.029 in < 0.125 in
Fy
36
OK
When considering the fatigue limit state, the following equation must be
satisfied:
hs
[Table 6.6.1.2.5-3]
2 hmax L
FTH
where, FTH = 24 ksi (Category A steel detail).

Note that the live load used for this check is not based on reactions from
the fatigue truck. Rather, it is the total live load for the service limit
state.
L =
Pll
108
=
= 0.450 ksi
A B 12 20
Minimum steel plate thickness for this check is

Min. hs =
2 hmax L
2 0.375 0.450
=
= 0.014 < 0.125 in
FTH
24
OK
AUGUST 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
14-36
Use a 12" x 20" x 31/8" bearing pad, composed of two 1/4 inch cover
laminates, five 3/8 inch interior laminates, and six 1/8 inch steel plates.
B. Curved Plate
Design
The thickness of the plate is H. The curved plate has a width (B), which
is equal to the width of the bearing pad. The length (G) is determined in
an iterative process with the thickness. Begin by checking the thickness
for a curved composite plate with a length of 4.5 inches. If thickness of
the bearing plate is more than 2 inches, increase the length of the curved
plate until the bearing plate thickness and composite plate thickness are
approximately equal. After 4.5 inches, try 6 inches. If 6 inches does not
work, increase length by increments of 2 inches thereafter.
Try a 20" x 4.5" curved plate ( B = 20 in, G = 4.5 in).
First, determine the radius of the contact surface. The radius of the
curved plate is a function of the yield strength of the steel and the load
intensity.
The contact length of the sole plate with the curved plate is equal to the
curved plate width minus the pintles and bevels.
Refer to Figure
14.8.2.2.
Contact length L sp is equal to
L SP = 20 2 (1.75) 2 (0.25) 2 (0.25) = 15.50 in
Figure 14.8.2.2
AUGUST 2006
[14.7.1.4]
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
14-37

assemblies, the minimum radius permitted is determined with LRFD
Equation C14.7.1.4-1 and C14.7.1.4-2. Start by assuming radius is
12.5 inches ore less, so use the first equation. Rearranging the equation
to solve for d , and dividing by 2 (to compute a radius) results in the
following:
R min
P
225
10 s
10
L
15.50
10 p
sp
=
=
=
= 10.5 in < 12.5 in
0.6 (Fy 13) 0.6 (Fy 13) 0.6 (36 13)
Assumption was correct.

The radius of curved plates is to be no less than 16 inches. Therefore,
specify the minimum radius for the curved plate to be 16 inches.
The required thickness of the curved composite plate is found using a
simple model where a uniform load is applied to the bottom of the plate
and the reaction is a line load. See Figure 14.8.2.3. Pressure on the
composite plate is:
cp =
Ps
225
=
= 2.50 ksi
B G 20 4.5
The maximum moment on a 1 inch strip of the composite plate is:

Mcp = cp
G G
4.5 4.5
= 2.50

2 4
2
4
The maximum allowable bending stress from Table 10.32.1A of the

Standard Specifications is used to size the plate:
fs = 0.55 Fy = 0.55 36 = 19.8 ksi
The required composite plate thickness is found by finding the thickness

of plate that has sufficient section modulus to carry the moment.
Sreq =
Mcp
fs
6.33
= 0.32 in 3
19.8
Minimum H = 6 Sreq = 6 0.32 = 1.39 in
AUGUST 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
14-38
The standard curved plate thickness is 11/4 inches. Since composite

action is assumed and the bearing plate thickness will be more than
1
/8 inch, use a 11/4 inch thick curved plate.
Figure 14.8.2.3
C. Bearing Plate
Design
Now determine the thickness of the bearing plate. The bearing plate has
plan dimensions that are slightly larger than the bearing pad to provide
adequate space for the attachment of knock-off weld studs. One inch is
provided on all sides for this purpose.
Bearing Plate width, E = 22 in
Bearing Plate length, C = 14 in
The bearing plate is assumed to act as a cantilever that carries the

bearing pad pressure back to the curved plate. See Figure 14.8.2.3.
AUGUST 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
14-39
The cantilever length is half the difference in length between the bearing
pad and the curved plate.
L cr =
A G 12 4.5
= 3.75 in
2 2
2
2
Mbp = s
L cr
2
= 0.938
3.752
2
Use the same procedure that was used to arrive at a curved plate
thickness.
Note that the minimum thickness for bearing plates is
11/2 inches.
Sreq =
Mbp
fs
6.60
= 0.333 in 3
19.8
Freq = 6 Sreq = 6 0.333 = 1.41 in
Use a 11/2 inch thick bearing plate.

D. Sole Plate
Constraints
Set the sole plate width 2 inches greater than the curved plate width and
check that it is sufficiently wider than the beam bottom flange to allow
welding.
Sole plate width = 20 + 2 = 22 in > 20 in flange
OK
The sole plate length must be 6 inches minimum, but not less than the
curved plate length. Therefore, set sole plate length equal to 6 inches.
The minimum sole plate thickness is 11/4 inches. When the bearing pad
width exceeds the bottom flange width, the sole plate must be designed
as a cantilever to resist the load from the pad that extends outside the
flange. In this case, the bottom flange width equals the pad width, so set
sole plate thickness equal to 11/4 inches.
The bearing design is summarized in Figure 14.8.2.4.
AUGUST 2006
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
Figure 14.8.2.4
14-40
&@% Minnesota Department of Transportation
gp Memo
Office Tel: (651)747-2106

Fax:
747-2108
Bridge Office
Mail Stop 610
3485 Hadley Ave.
Oakdale, MN 55128
February 14,2005
To:
Bridge Design Engineers
From:
Kevin Western
Bridge Design Engineer
-3
MEMO TO DESIGNERS: LRFD and Bridge Load Rating Issues

As we continue with LRFD Implementation we have noted a few low LFD load ratings on
bridges designed with LRFD methods. The following modifications to design procedures are
to be incorporated into all designs immediately:
LLDF Correction for Skew (LRFD 4.6.2.2.2e and 4.6.2.2.3~)
As skews increase over 45 degrees the moment skew reduction factor for live load
distribution can exceed 10%. Several LFD load ratings have shown a significant capacity
shortfall since current rating methods do not account for this reduction with skew.
Designers shall no longer utilize the moment reduction for skew. The shear magnification
for skew should continue to be used.
Ultimate Capacity of Prestressed Concrete Beams

For most prestressed concrete beam designs, service limit state checks control the design.
As sections become more lightly prestressed, the ultimate capacity (Strength Limit State) of
the member begins to control the design. Bridges with lightly prestressed beams have
resulted in very low operating ratings. To ensure an adequate minimum load rating level,
designers must provide moment capacity in excess of 1.30 of the required moment, that is:
Longitudinal Steel Check (LRFD 5 3.3.5)

The longitudinal steel check requires adequate transfer length of prestressing steel to resist
the applied shear and moment. The LRFD Specifications allow designers to ignore the
moment component of the equation at simply supported beam ends. MnDOT agrees with
this allowance for our typical prestressed beams. Our design guidance states that strands
should be placed from the bottom up in the cross section, filling one row before filling rows
higher in the beam. This method keeps the center of gravity of the strands as low as
possible. It also limits the moment component for the longitudinal check. If this guidance
for placing strands as low as possible is not followed, designers must also verify the
longitudinal capacity with the equation including the moment component at the section.
Page 1 of 2
MEMO #2005-01
Desian Live Load for Continuous Bridges

Over the last year we have noted several LRFD continuousgirder designs that exhibited
low load ratings over sections at the piers. To ensure that these load ratings are at
acceptable minimum levels, designers shall consider the following amplified double truck
plus lane load case (in place of the double truck plus lane load case required by LJWD
3.6.1.3) when designing continuous beams for the Strength I Limit State. This load is for
moment and reaction only.
For bridges with longest span below 100 feet:
90% of the HL-93 double truck with DLA plus lane load (same as in LRFD 3.6.1.3)
For bridges with longest span between 100 and 200 feet:
(90 + (span - 100)*0.2)% of the HL-93 double truck with DLA plus lane load
For bridges with longest q a n above 200 feet:
110% of the HL-93 double truck with DLA plus lane load
\
When your superstructure design is to the point where load ratings can be completed, please
supply the information to the Bridge Load Rating Unit. Additional lead time will allow load
ratings to be completed and comments given back to the designer on possible modifications
before plan details are finalized.
If you have any questions about these issues please bring them to my attention. As you continue
with LRFD designs, more rating concerns may be noted. Please contact Dave Dahlberg or me if
you have additional concerns.
cc: D. Dorgan
L. Johnson
E. Lutgen
G. Peterson
D. Dahlberg
B.Miller / Design Consultants
Page 2 of 2
MEMO #2005-01
Memo
Bridge Office
Mail Stop 610
3485 Hadley Ave.
Oakdale, MN 55128
Office Tel:(651) 747-2106

Fax:
747-2108
November 9, 2005
To:
From:
Kevin Western
MEMO TO DESIGNERS (2005-02): Discontinue Use of Cast Bearing Option

A few years ago MnDOT, at the urging of the casting industry, developed a cast bearing
option that could be used in lieu of our fabricated curved plate bearing assembly. The reason
for development of the cast bearing option was to create competition with a lower cost
alternative, thereby realizing MnDOT a cost savings. Since development of the details, no
contractor has utilized the cast bearing option.
At this time we are discontinuing the use of the cast bearing option. Designers should no
longer place Standard Details B317 and B318 in their bridge plans as an alternate to our
fabricated assembly. In addition, the detail standards will no longer be available on our web
site.
If you have any questions or concerns on this issue, please contact Erik Wolhowe or me.
cc: D. Dorgan
D. Dahlberg
E. Wolhowe
Page 1 of 1
Memo
Bridge Office
Mail Stop 610
3485 Hadley Ave.
Oakdale, MN 55128
Office Tel:(651) 747-2106

Fax:
747-2108
November 10, 2005

To:
From:
Kevin Western
MEMO TO DESIGNERS (2005-03): New MN45 and MN54 Prestressed Concrete Beams
A short time ago MnDOT began examining prestressed beam shapes used around the country
to determine if any shape provided a cost effective advantage over our current shape. The new
shape that Iowa DOT developed a few years ago appears to meet this criteria. This shape is
also very similar to the Wisconsin shape which will allow our fabricators to market beams to
all three states with the use of a common form. Estimates show the beams can span up to 8 %
longer or can be spaced up to 30% wider than the previous beams. Attached below are
Figures 5.4.6.1 and 5.4.6.2 of the LRFD Manual showing beam section properties and the
beam selection chart modified to include the MN45 and MN54 beams.
Tables 14.7.1 and 14.7.2 from the MnDOT LRFD Manual provide expansion and fixed curved
plate bearing assembly standard sizes. These tables are in the process of being modified. With
the new beams you will notice that although they have a wider bottom flange, the standard
bearing pad remains 24 inches wide and the plates keep their same dimensions except for the
width of the bearing plate for the fixed bearing. This dimension has been increased by 4 inches
(to 38 inches) to allow for placement of the anchor rods.
Below is a listing of the Standard Plans and B-Details that were developed or modified for the
new shape:
5-397.507
5-397.508
B303
B310
B311
B403
B811
B814
MN45 Prestressed Concrete Beam

MN54 Prestressed Concrete Beam
Sole Plate
Curved Plate Bearing Assembly - Fixed
Curved Plate Bearing Assembly - Expansion
Steel Intermediate Diaphragm
Concrete End Diaphragm Contraction Abutment
Concrete End Diaphragm Parapet Abutment
We are evaluating the addition of a MN63 PCB shape to this family of shapes. A final
decision on that addition will be made early next year after concurrence with our producers.
Please do not utilize the MN63 until we announce that they are available.
Page 1 of 2
Please utilize these new MN shapes on prestressed beam bridges requiring 45 or 54 inch high
beams. If you have any questions or concerns about these standards, please contact Erik
Wolhowe or me.
cc: D. Dorgan
D. Dahlberg
E. Wolhowe
Attachments: 5-29 and 5-30 of LRFD Bridge Design Manual
Page 2 of 2
NOVEMBER 2005
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
5-29
DESIGN ASSUMPTIONS FOR PRESTRESSED CONCRETE BEAM CHART:

2004 AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, 3rd Edition.
HL-93 Live Load
Beam Concrete:
fc = 9.0 ksi
= 7.5 ksi
fci
wbm = 0.155 kips/ft
Ec = 1265 fc + 1000 ksi

Deck Concrete:
fc = 4.0 ksi
Ec = 3644 ksi
wc = 0.150 kips/ft
0.6" diameter low relaxation strands, Es = 28,500 ksi

fpu = 270 ksi with initial pull of 0.75 fpu
Simple supports with six beams and deck without wearing course.
Deck carries two F-Rails with no sidewalk or median, skew = 0 degrees.
Effective deck thickness is total deck thickness minus 1/2" of wear.
11/2" stool height used for composite beam section properties.
21/2" average stool height used for dead load calculations.
Rail dead load applied equally to all beams.
Dead load includes 0.020 ksf future wearing course.
Refined losses are used.
Service Concrete Tensile Stress Limits:
After Initial Losses:
0.2 ksi
0.094 fci
After All Losses:
0.19 fc
Beam Properties
BEAM
SHAPE
AREA
2
(in)
(in )
(lb/ft)
(in)
(in )
SB
3
Ac
d
2
(in )
(in )
14RB
14
Rect.
364
392
7.00
5,945
849
312
18RB
18
Rect.
468
504
9.00
12,640
1,404
364
22RB
22
Rect.
572
616
11.00
23,070
2,097
416
27M
27
I-Beam
516
555
13.59
43,080
3,170
296
36M
36
I-Beam
570
614
17.96
93,530
5,208
323
45M
45
I-Beam
624
672
22.34
167,050
7,478
350
54M
54
I-Beam
678
730
26.75
265,830
9,938
377
63M
63
I-Beam
732
788
31.17
392,060
12,580
404
72M
72
I-Beam
786
846
35.60
547,920
15,390
431
81M
81
I-Beam
840
904
40.04
735,620
18,370
458
MN45
45
I-Beam
690
743
20.63
179,000
8,677
427
MN54
54
I-Beam
749
806
24.68
285,690
11,580
457
c Based on 155 pounds per cubic foot.

d Based on a 9" slab with 1/2" of wear and 11/2" stool.
Figure 5.4.6.1
Precast Prestressed Concrete Beam Data
S P A N L E N G T H (F E E T )
63M
72M
81M
Figure 5.4.6.2
44@5.3
14RB
18RB
22RB
27M
36M
20@4.2
26@5.6
28@6.6
34@5.1
38@5.1
45M
40@4.8
MN45 50@5.5
54M
44@5.1
44@5.1
44@5.1
42@4.9
20@4.2
26@5.6
28@6.6
32@4.9
34@4.2
40@5.6
50@5.5
50@4.9
44@5.1
44@5.1
44@5.1
40@4.6
BEAM SPACING (FEET)
20@4.4
26@5.6
28@6.6
32@5.7
34@4.9
36@4.2
46@4.7
50@4.9
44@5.1
44@5.1
44@5.1
10
40@5.1
44@6.0
44@5.1
44@5.1
11
20@4.4
26@5.6
28@6.6
30@5.1
34@5.6
36@4.5
46@5.4
48@4.7
VERIFY
SHIPPING
f 'ci = 7.5 ksi
12
48@5.0
13
20@4.4
26@5.6
28@6.6
30@5.5
32@4.8
36@5.3
38@4.8
42@4.1
42@5.2
44@5.1
44@5.1
NUMBERS ADJACENT TO POINTS ON THE

GRAPH REPRESENT AN APPROXIMATE DESIGN
NUMBER OF STRANDS AND CENTER OF
GRAVITY AT MIDSPAN.
DESIGN CRITERIA
HL-93 LOADING
f 'c = 9.0 ksi
0.6" STRANDS
14
LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140 MN54 50@4.9
150
160
170
180
PRESTRESSED CONCRETE BEAM CHART

(Chart is for preliminary use only. See Figure 5.4.6.1 for design assumptions.)
NOVEMBER 2005
5-30
Memo
Bridge Office
Mail Stop 610
3485 Hadley Ave.
Oakdale, MN 55128
Office Tel:(651) 747-2106

Fax:
747-2108
May 31, 2006

To:
From:
Kevin Western
MEMO TO DESIGNERS (2006-01): New MN63 Prestressed Concrete Beam

Late last year we transitioned over to a new shape (namely MN) for our 45 and 54 inch height
prestressed beams. At that time we stated that we would be developing a new 63 inch shape
utilizing the same flange sizes as the MN shape. This memo is to inform designers that the
details and manual references are now available for use and should be utilized for all bridges
specifying 63 inch beams. Comparisons have shown that these beams can span up to 8%
longer or can be spaced up to 30% wider than the previous beam shape.
The following LRFD Bridge Design Manual and Bridge details have been modified for the
MN63 prestressed concrete beams.
MN63 Prestressed Concrete Beam Standard Detail

Figures 5.4.6.1 and 5.4.6.2 of the LRFD Manual showing beam section properties and
the beam selection chart modified to include the MN63 beam.
B303 - Sole Plate
B403 - Steel Intermediate Diaphragm
B811 - Concrete End Diaphragm Contraction Abutment
B814 - Concrete End Diaphragm Parapet Abutment
Table 14.7.1 from the MnDOT LRFD Manual provides fixed curved plate bearing
assembly standard sizes. (The standard bearing pad will remain 24 inches wide and
the other plates keep their same dimensions except the width of the bearing plate for
the fixed bearing assembly is increased by 4 inches to 38 inches to allow for
placement of anchor rods. This table is in the process of being modified.)
Please utilize the new MN63 prestressed beam shape on all future bridge lettings utilizing
beams 63 inches in height. If you have any questions or concerns about these standards,
please contact Erik Wolhowe or me.
cc: D. Dorgan
D. Dahlberg
E. Wolhowe
Page 1 of 1

Bridge Office
Mail Stop 610
3485 Hadley Avenue North
Phone No: 651/747-2100

Fax No: 651/747-2108
February 7, 2007
DISTRIBUTION: Mn/DOT Bridge Office Web site
TRANSMITTAL NOTICE (2007-01)
ISSUED BY
Bridge Office
DEVELOPED BY
Bridge Office
MANUAL
SUBJECT
Manual Cover
Table of Contents
Section 2: GENERAL DESIGN AND LOCATION FEATURES
The Mn/DOT Bridge Office LRFD Bridge Design Manual is available for download in Adobe PDF
(Portable Document Format) at http://www.dot.state.mn.us/bridge/ . This Web site should be
checked regularly for updates.
INSTRUCTIONS:
(for two-sided printing)
1.
Remove from the manual:

Manual Cover (ii)
Table of Contents (i, ii and iii)
2-1 through 2-116 (entire section)
2.
Print and insert in the manual:

Manual Cover (ii)
Table of Contents (i, ii and iii)
Note: The FEBRUARY 2007 update of Section 2 is the fourth update to the section.
Therefore, it is being republished in its entirety. All vertical revision lines added during the
previous three updates have been removed. A single vertical line in the margin indicates a
revision made to the text during the fourth update.
Any technical questions regarding this transmittal should be directed to Dave Dahlberg,
LRFD Implementation, at 651/747-2116.
Daniel L. Dorgan

Bridge Office
Mail Stop 610
Phone No: 651/747-2100

Fax No: 651/747-2108
October 19, 2006

ISSUED BY
Bridge Office
DEVELOPED BY
Bridge Office
MANUAL
SUBJECT
Manual Cover
Table of Contents
Section 3: LOAD AND LOAD FACTORS
Section 4: STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION
INSTRUCTIONS:
1.

Manual Cover (ii)
Table of Contents (iii and iv)
2.

Manual Cover (ii)
Table of Contents (iii and iv)
LRFD Implementation, at 651/747-2116.
Daniel L. Dorgan

Bridge Office
Mail Stop 610
Phone No: (651) 747-2100

Fax No: (651) 747-2108
August 21, 2006

ISSUED BY
Bridge Office
DEVELOPED BY
Bridge Office
MANUAL
SUBJECT
Manual Cover
Table of Contents
Section 14: JOINTS AND BEARINGS
INSTRUCTIONS:
1.

Manual Cover (ii)
Table of Contents (ix and x)
2.

Manual Cover (ii)
LRFD Implementation, at (651) 747-2116.
Daniel L. Dorgan

Bridge Office
Mail Stop 610
Phone No: (651) 747-2100

Fax No: (651) 747-2108
May 31, 2006

ISSUED BY
Bridge Office
DEVELOPED BY
Bridge Office
MANUAL
SUBJECT
Manual Cover
Table of Contents
Section 5: CONCRETE STRUCTURES
Section 13: RAILINGS
A. MEMOS
The Mn/DOT Bridge Office LRFD Bridge Design Manual is available for download in Adobe
PDF (Portable Document Format) at http://www.dot.state.mn.us/bridge/ . This Web site
should be checked regularly for updates.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1.

Manual Cover (ii)
5-1 and 5-2, 5-29 and 5-30
2.

Manual Cover (ii)
5-1 and 5-2, 5-29 and 5-30
MEMO #2006-01 New MN63 Prestressed Concrete Beam
(dated May 31, 2006)
3.
Daniel L. Dorgan

Bridge Office
Mail Stop 610
Phone No: (651) 747-2100

Fax No: (651) 747-2108
April 5, 2006
ISSUED BY
Bridge Office
DEVELOPED BY
Bridge Office
MANUAL
SUBJECT
Manual Cover
INSTRUCTIONS:
1.

Manual Cover (ii)
2-5 and 2-6, 2-9 and 2-10, 2-11 and 2-12, 2-15 and 2-16, 2-23 and 2-24, 2-25 and
2-26, 2-43 and 2-44, 2-57 and 2-58, 2-67 and 2-68, 2-101 through 2-106, 2-109 and
2-110, 2-113 and 2-114.
2.

Manual Cover (ii)
2-5 and 2-6, 2-9 and 2-10, 2-11 and 2-12, 2-15 and 2-16, 2-23 and 2-24, 2-24a and
2-24b, 2-25 and 2-26, 2-43 and 2-44, 2-57 and 2-58, 2-67 and 2-68, 2-101 through
2-106, 2-109 and 2-110, 2-113 and 2-114.
3.
Daniel L. Dorgan

Bridge Office
Mail Stop 610
Phone No: (651) 747-2100

Fax No: (651) 747-2108
March 14, 2006

MANUAL
SUBJECT
Manual Cover
Table of Contents
Section 1: INTRODUCTION
ISSUED BY
Bridge Office
DEVELOPED BY
Bridge Office
INSTRUCTIONS:
1.

Manual Cover (ii)
Table of Contents (i and ii)
1-1 through 1-18 (entire section).
2.

Manual Cover (ii)
Table of Contents (i and ii)
1-1 through 1-21 (entire section).
3.
Daniel L. Dorgan

Bridge Office
Mail Stop 610
Phone No: (651) 747-2100

Fax No: (651) 747-2108
November 14, 2005

ISSUED BY
Bridge Office
DEVELOPED BY
Bridge Office
MANUAL
SUBJECT
Manual Cover
Table of Contents
A. MEMOS
The following pages in Section 5 have been changed:
5-2, 5-17, 5-19, 5-20, 5-22, 5-25, 5-28, 5-29, 5-30, 5-36, 5-43, 5-44, 5-77, 5-82, 5-99, 5-119,
5-120 and 5-121.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1.

Manual Cover (ii)
5-1 and 5-2, 5-17 through 5-22, 5-25 through 5-30, 5-35 and 5-36, 5-43 and 5-44,
5-77 and 5-78, 5-81 and 5-82, 5-99 and 5-100, 5-119 through 5-122.
2.

Manual Cover (ii)
5-1 and 5-2, 5-17 through 5-22, 5-25 through 5-30, 5-35 and 5-36, 5-43 and 5-44,
5-77 and 5-78, 5-81 and 5-82, 5-99 and 5-100, 5-119 through 5-122.
MEMO #2005-02 Discontinue Use of Cast Bearing Option
(dated November 9, 2005)
MEMO #2005-03 New MN45 and MN54 Prestressed Concrete Beams
(dated November 10, 2005)
3.
Daniel L. Dorgan

Bridge Office
Mail Stop 610
Phone No: (651) 747-2100

Fax No: (651) 747-2108
March 24, 2005

ISSUED BY
Bridge Office
DEVELOPED BY
Bridge Office
MANUAL
SUBJECT
Manual Cover
The following pages in Section 2 have been changed:
2-4, 2-5, 2-6, 2-7, 2-8, 2-9, 2-10, 2-11, 2-12, 2-13, 2-14, 2-15, 2-19, 2-21, 2-22, 2-30, 2-31.
2-41, 2-42, 2-53, 2-62, 2-88, 2-89, 2-90, 2-94, 2-95, 2-96, 2-97, 2-100, 2-101, 2-102, 2-103,
2-104, 2-105, 2-106, 2-107, 2-108, 2-109, 2-111, 2-112, 2-113, and 2-114.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1.

Manual Cover (ii)
2-3 through 2-16, 2-19 through 2-22, 2-29 through 2-32, 2-41 and 2-42,
2-53 and 2-54, 2-61 and 2-62, 2-87 through 2-90, 2-93 through 2-114.
2.

Manual Cover (ii)
2-3 through 2-16, 2-19 through 2-22, 2-29 through 2-32, 2-41 and 2-42,
2-53 and 2-54, 2-61 and 2-62, 2-87 through 2-90, 2-93 through 2-114.
3.
Daniel L. Dorgan

Bridge Office
Mail Stop 610
Phone No: (651) 747-2100

Fax No: (651) 747-2108
March 22, 2005

MANUAL
SUBJECT:
Table of Contents
A. MEMOS
ISSUED BY
Bridge Office
DEVELOPED BY
Bridge Office
INSTRUCTIONS:
1.

2.

Memo #2005-01 LRFD and Bridge Load Rating Issues (dated 02-14-2005)
You may already have this memo.
Replace it with the one attached to this transmittal notice,
which is numbered in the lower-right corner.
3.
Daniel L. Dorgan

Bridge Office
Mail Stop 610
Phone No: (651) 747-2100

Fax No: (651) 747-2108
December 17, 2004

ISSUED BY
Bridge Office
DEVELOPED BY
Bridge Office
MANUAL
SUBJECT:
Manual Cover and Table of Contents

Section 9: DECKS AND DECK SYSTEMS
INSTRUCTIONS:
1.

Manual Cover (ii) and Table of Contents (vii and viii)
Section 9 (9-1 through 9-30, inclusive)
2.

Manual Cover (ii) and Table of Contents (vii and viii)
3.
Daniel L. Dorgan

Bridge Office
Mail Stop 610
Phone No: (651) 747-2100

Fax No: (651) 747-2108
October 20, 2004

ISSUED BY
Bridge Office
DEVELOPED BY
Bridge Office
MANUAL
SUBJECT:
Manual Cover and Table of Contents

INSTRUCTIONS:
1.

Manual Cover (ii) and Table of Contents (i through x, inclusive)
2.

Manual Cover (ii) and Table of Contents (i through x, inclusive)
3.
Daniel L. Dorgan

Bridge Office
Mail Stop 610
Phone No: 651-747-2101

Fax No: 651-747-2108
April 30, 2004

MANUAL
ISSUED BY
Bridge Office
DEVELOPED BY
Bridge Office
SUBJECT: Section 2: GENERAL DESIGN AND LOCATION FEATURES
INSTRUCTIONS:
1.
Remove from the manual: Section 2, pages 2-1 through 2-121 inclusive.
2.
Print and insert in the manual: Section 2, pages 2-1 through 2-116 inclusive.
3.
LRFD Implementation, at 651-747-2116.
Daniel L. Dorgan

Bridge Office
Mail Stop 610
Phone No: 651-747-2101

Fax No: 651-747-2108
April 30, 2004

MANUAL
ISSUED BY
Bridge Office
DEVELOPED BY
Bridge Office
SUBJECT: Manual Cover and Table of Contents
INSTRUCTIONS:
1.
Remove from the manual: Manual Cover (page ii) and Table of Contents (page i, ii, and
iii).
2.
Print and insert in the manual: Manual Cover (page ii) and Table of Contents (page i, ii,
and iii).
3.
LRFD Implementation, at 651-747-2116.
Daniel L. Dorgan

LRFD Manual Update2007

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

LRFD Manual Update2007

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

LRFD Bridge

MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Mn/DOT BRIDGE OFFICE

LRFD Bridge Design Manual

Minnesota Department of Transportation

LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN

Overview Of Manual 5-392 ............................................................... 1-1

Material Contained in Manual 5-392 .......................................... 1-1

Updates to Manual 5-392 ........................................................ 1-2

Format of Manual References................................................... 1-2

General Bridge Information .............................................................. 1-2

Bridge Office ......................................................................... 1-3

Highway Systems................................................................... 1-8

Bridge Numbers ..................................................................... 1-8

Limit States to Consider in Design .......................................... 1-11

Checking of Mn/DOT Prepared Bridge Plans ............................. 1-11

Checking of Consultant Prepared Bridge Plans .......................... 1-12

Schedule for Processing Construction Lettings .......................... 1-16

Bridge Project Tracking System.............................................. 1-17

Approval Process for Standards .............................................. 1-21

GENERAL DESIGN AND LOCATION FEATURES........................................ 2-1

Geometrics .................................................................................... 2-1

Bridge Geometrics.................................................................. 2-1

Bridge Deck Requirements ...................................................... 2-2

Bridge Undercrossing Geometrics ............................................. 2-7

Geometric Details ................................................................ 2-15

Bridge Railings .................................................................... 2-28

Bridge Aesthetics .......................................................................... 2-28

Preliminary Bridge Plans ................................................................ 2-28

General .............................................................................. 2-28

Bridge Type Selection ........................................................... 2-38

LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN

Final Bridge Plans and Special Provisions .......................................... 2-43

Final Design Instructions ....................................................... 2-44

Superstructure ................................................................ 2-45

Framing Plan ..................................................... 2-45

Concrete Wearing Course .................................... 2-46

Diaphragms and Cross Frames ............................. 2-46

Pedestrian Bridges ........................................................... 2-47

Temporary Bridges and Widenings ..................................... 2-49

Bridge Approaches........................................................... 2-50

Survey ........................................................................... 2-50

Utilities .......................................................................... 2-50

Precedence of Construction Documents............................... 2-52

Design Calculation Requirements ....................................... 2-52

Final Plans .......................................................................... 2-52

Drafting Standards .......................................................... 2-53

Drafting Guidelines .......................................................... 2-53

General Plan and Elevation ............................................... 2-56

Bridge Layout and Staking Plan ......................................... 2-61

Standard Abbreviations .................................................... 2-64

Inclusion of Standard Bridge Details in Plan Sets.................. 2-64

Use of Bridge Standard Plans ............................................ 2-64

Standard Plan Notes ........................................................ 2-64

Quantity Notes and Pay Items ........................................... 2-65

Revised Sheets .................................................................... 2-66

Reconstruction Guidelines and Details .............................................. 2-67

Superstructure .................................................................... 2-67

Railings .......................................................................... 2-67

Wearing Course............................................................... 2-69

Expansion/Fixed Joints ..................................................... 2-69

Substructure ....................................................................... 2-81

Piers .............................................................................. 2-81