Article X 10

Case No.: ___

IMBONG V OCHOA
G.R. No.
Date | Ponente

I.

FACTS
Petitioners assert that the use of contraception results in abortion as they operate to kill the fertilized
ovum which already has life. Defenders of the RH LAW state that the law only promotes nonabortifacient reproductive health care devise, methods and supplies shall be made accessible.
Contraceptives that kill or destroy the fertilized ovum should be deemed abortive and thus, prohibited.
At issue is the definition of Contraception:
a) Lagman When fertilized ovum attaches itself to the uterus according to the WHO.
b) Webster/Black upon fertilization
c) Franers of the Constitution Upon fertilization

Conception upon fertilization means that the union of the sperm cell and egg cell resulting in the
formulation of the new individual with unique genetic composition.

II.

ISSUE(S) & RATIO

III.

FALLO

IV.

SEPARATE OPINION (if any)

Notes:
1. Please use TNR 11
2. Please use bold for important parts in the discussion
3. Example for Part II
1. WON preventive suspension of xxx is considered as voluntary renunciation of office? YES
Based on the intent of the framers, voluntary renunciation is.
2. WON xxx may run for mayor without violating Art. X 8 of the Constitution? NO
4. Example for fallo. Petition granted. RA xxx xx declared void for being unconstitutional.
5. As much as possible, kindly limit to 2 pages unless the discussion necessitates a longer digest.