Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MISO
ii
Contents
1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1
1.1
Background .................................................................................................................... 1
1.2
1.2.1
1.2.2
1.2.3
1.3
1.4
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
2.6
2.7
2.8
PV Models ...................................................................................................................... 8
MISO
1
Introduction
For the 2014 cycle of the MISO Transmission Expansion Plan (MTEP) MISO intends to update
the dynamic model such that all generators are modeled using a component model from a
standard list which will be developed jointly with MISO staff and stakeholders. This was
originally proposed in the October 15th, 2013 Planning Subcommittee (PSC)1 and this document
is the initial list of standard component models.
MISO fully expects and intends this initial list to change as stakeholders review and provide
feedback on it. The goal is to come to agreement on a standard list prior to the MTEP14
dynamic model development in order to have all generators within the MISO footprint modeled
with a component dynamic from this standard list.
1.1 Background
In MTEP12 MISO started an effort to improve the numerical simulation performance of the
dynamic model by replacing older and simpler component models with newer and more
accurate component models. MISO worked jointly with stakeholders to replace the classical
generator model (GENCLS) and 3-phase induction machine model (CIMTR3) with more
accurate and appropriate models. Stakeholder response was very high and as a result the
MTEP12 and MTEP13 dynamic models no longer suffer from the numerical instability caused by
the GENCLS and CIMTR3 models.
As a continuation of this effort MISO is broadening the scope by establishing a standardized list
of generator component dynamic models.
MISO
component models, and idiosyncrasies of the software tool. It becomes even more difficult when
user-defined models (UDMs) are incorporated into the dynamics package.
UDMs are typically provided as black boxes with little to no information on their inner workings.
Getting any information about a manufacture provided UDM requires non-disclosure
agreements be signed with multiple parties and it is very rare to obtain the complete block
diagram of a UDM. Without adequate information of a UDM it is very difficult to troubleshoot
issues associated with the UDM during the development of the dynamics package.
Troubleshooting UDMs becomes nearly impossible once the dynamic package is handed off to
other users for analysis. Often the only recourse to resolving an issue with a UDM is to simply
remove it from the dynamics package.
Quantifying the amount of time spent incorporating UDMs is difficult but consider the
composition of the MTEP13 dynamic package. Figure 1-1 shows the breakdown by model type
of the total number of unique models and cumulative MVA of generators in the MISO footprint
as modeled in MTEP13. Looking at wind generation modeled with a UDM and assuming an
equal amount of time is spent on each unique model means that MISO staff spends 28% of their
time to model only 3% of the generation installed. In reality the situation is worse as UDMs
require much more time than the generic models.
Cumulative MVA
4% 3%
7%
28%
4%
60%
8%
86%
Although UDMs may provide the most accurate representation of a particular manufactures
generator it is not the most efficient use of time to incorporate it especially when generic models
exist which can adequately represent the generator in question. The imbalance of effort
required for UDMs compared to generic models is staggering but can be corrected by
establishing a standard list of models.
MISO
Please note that TSAT may not have a standard library model for all PSS/E or PSLF dynamic
component model but still has the ability to automatically read and convert them into the
appropriate TSAT format. Some models will be listed as UDM for TSAT, however; this should
not be confused with the term user-written model or UDM used in the context of PSS/E or
PSLF.
MISO
Also, understand that since the list is being created assuming the aforementioned software
versions, the newer versions of the renewable energy and static var system dynamic models
are not available.
All feedback should be sent to Pat Jehring at pjehring@misoenergy.org by January 31st, 2014.
An updated list with stakeholder feedback will be presented at the February 18 th, 2014 PSC.
MISO
2
Standard Generator Component Model List
Please note that TSAT may not have a standard library model for all PSS/E or PSLF dynamic
component model but still has the ability to automatically read and convert them into the
appropriate TSAT format. Some models will be listed as UDM for TSAT, however; this should
not be confused with the term user-written model or UDM used in the context of PSS/E or
PSLF.
PSLF V18
TSAT V12
Description
CSTATT
stcon
UDM
CSVGN1
vwscc
SVC Type 1
CSVGN5
vwscc
SVC Type 2
GENROE
genrou
DG0S2
GENROU
genrou
DG0S5
GENSAE
gensal
DG0S2
GENSAL
gensal
DG0S4
Notes
Not a direct
conversion for
PSLF
Not a direct
conversion for
PSLF
If combined with
STBSVC model
will convert to
SVC Type 3 in
TSAT
MISO
PSLF V18
esdc1a
esdc2a
esdc3a
esdc4b
esac1a
esac2a
esac3a
esac4a
esac5a
esac6a
TSAT V12
EXC1
EXC1
UDM
UDM
EXC5
EXC6
EXC4
EXC30
EXC10
UDM
Description
1992 IEEE Type DC1A
1992 IEEE Type DC2A
2005 IEEE Type DC3A
2005 IEEE Type DC4B
1992 IEEE Type AC1A
1992 IEEE Type AC2A
1992 IEEE Type AC3A
1992 IEEE Type AC4A
1992 IEEE Type AC5A
1992 IEEE Type AC6A
Notes
PSS/E V32
AC7B
AC8B
ESST1A
ESST2A
ESST3A
ESST4B
ST5B
ST6B
ST7B
EXBAS
PSLF V18
esac7b
esac8b
esst1a
esst2a
esst3a
esst4b
esst5b
esst6b
esst7b
-
TSAT V12
UDM
UDM
EXC34
EXC7
EXC8
UDM
UDM
UDM
UDM
UDM
EXPIC1
expic1
UDM
SCRX
scrx
EXC30
SEXS
sexs
EXC30
Description
2005 IEEE Type AC7B
2005 IEEE Type AC8B
1992 IEEE Type ST1A
1992 IEEE Type ST2A
1992 IEEE Type ST3A
2005 IEEE Type ST4B
2005 IEEE Type ST5B
2005 IEEE Type ST6B
2005 IEEE Type ST7B
Basler Static Voltage
Regulator Feeding DC
Proportional/integral
Excitation
Bus or solid fed SCR
Bridge Excitation
Simplified Excitation
Notes
Only to be used
for future
machine where
excitation system
details are
unknown
Only to be used
for future
machine where
excitation system
details are
unknown
PSLF V18
TSAT V12
DEGOV1
GAST
HYGOV
gast
hygov
UDM
GOV7
GOV20
IEEEG1
ieeeg1
GOV4
IEEEG2
ieeeg2
GOV22
IEEEG3
TGOV1
ieeeg3
tgov1
GOV21
GOV6
TGOV3
tgov3
GOV4
GGOV1
ggov1
UDM
PIDGOV
pidgov
UDM
MISO
Description
Woodward diesel
governor
Gas Turbine-governor
Hydro turbine-governor
1981 IEEE Type 1
Turbine-governor
1981 IEEE Type 2
Turbine-governor
1981 IEEE Type 3
Turbine-governor
Steam Turbine-governor
Modified IEEE Type 1
turbine-governor with
fast valving
GE General purpose
turbine-governor
Hydro turbine and
governor
Notes
PSLF V18
lcfb1
TSAT V12
UDM
Description
Turbine Load Controller
Notes
PSLF V18
ieest
pss2a
pss2b
pss3b
pss4b
TSAT V12
PSS1
PSS9
PSS9
UDM
UDM
STAB3
PSS1
STAB4
PSS12
Description
1981 IEEE PSS
1992 IEEE PSS2A
2005 IEEE PSS2B
2005 IEEE PSS3B
2005 IEEE PSS4B
Power Sensitive
Stabilizer
Power Sensitive
Stabilizer
svcwsc
SVC Type
3*
STBSVC
Notes
PSLF V18
-
TSAT V12
-
Description
1981 IEEE Voltage
Compensating model
REMCMP
TSAT V12
WGNA,
WGNAT,
WGNAE
WGNB,
WGNBT,
WGNBE
Description
Generic Type 1 WTG
wt3g, wt3e,
wt3t, wt3p
WGNBC,
WGNBT,
WGNBE
wt4g, wt4e,
wt4t, wt4p
WGND,
WGNDT,
WGNBE
-
Notes
Embedded in
PSLF generator
record and TSAT
exciter model
PSLF V18
wt1g,
wt1t,wt1p
W4G2U,
MISO
wt2g, wt2e,
wt2t, wt2p
Notes
Includes
7
W4E2U
WTG
additional
parameters to
model Siemens
WTG
Description
Notes
No standard
model currently
available across
software
platforms
2.8 PV Models
PSS/E V32
MISO
PSLF V18
TSAT V12