Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Government of Pan-Goa on the ground of failure to maintain Law and order. The DG
Central Para Military forces arrested more than one individual and in flagrant violation of
criminal procedure without any court permission were confined in the head quarter and
forced to give password of the video.
5. Association for Citizens Welfare is a registered Non-Governmental Organization and
very active for the cause of welfare of citizens of Megoliyana filed a writ petition before
the Supreme Court of Megoliyana challenging the constitutionality validity of guidelines
to install CCTV cameras near religious places and beaches. Rule 5 of the regulation
which gave power to the union government to install CCTV cameras in such cities where
in the opinion of government people are indulge in such activities was questioned on
ground of personal liberty. The association also challenged the constitutional validity of
the regulation which authorized the states to get password of encrypted data. It argued
that the policy of the current government is in violation of the individual liberty and right
to privacy. They also challenged the dismissal of the Pan-Goa elected government.
6. Whereas the union Government in its defense argued that security of the nation is ground
of formation of the Union and the representative of all the princely states agreed thereto.
Moreover, the cultural diversity cannot be ground to ignore security of nation. They
claimed that policy of Pan- Goa government led to creation of bad name and this
province is today known as center for sex tourism. Which as a party to CEDAW the
union government is committed to check. Further we have an obligation to prevent any
conduct which is threat to global peace and security. We have committed to UN General
to take necessary steps to tackle incidents of terrorism.
7. The Supreme Court of Megoliyana put this matter for hearing on 25th Nov, 2016.
Note: The laws of Megoliyana are in pari materia with the laws of India for the purposes of this
Moot Court Proposition. The names used in the proposition are only artificial and not to wound
or hurt any individual or institution.