Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Second Wednesday Topic: Lunch Break: What can we do to make lunch break healthier?
Make lunch breaks mandatory? Should the company carter more lunch breaks? Should
we make a lunchroom?
Third Wednesday Topic: Eating out of the office: How can we help our co-workers make
healthy choices out of the office?
Last Wednesday Topic: Clean Eating Cook Off: This will be the time where everyone
brings in his or her dish. This will also be the time where we vote on our favorite and the
winner will be given a prize on Friday after the mini lesson video.
Reference:
Auerbach, D., Holtzblatt, J., Jacobs, P., Minicozzi, A., Moomau, P., & White, C. (2010). Will
health insurance mandates increase coverage? Synthesizing perspectives from health, tax,
and behavioral economics. National Tax Journal, 63(4), 659-680.
Brooks, E. L., Preis, S. R., Hwang, S.-J., Murabito, J. M., Benjamin, E. J., Kelly-Hayes, M.,
Levy, D. (2010). Health Insurance and Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors. The
American Journal of Medicine, 123(8), 741747.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2010.02.013
Cheng, J., & Kozikowski, A. P. (2015). We Need 2C but Not 2B: Developing Serotonin 2C (5HT 2C ) Receptor Agonists for the Treatment of CNS Disorders. ChemMedChem, 10(12),
1963-1967. doi:10.1002/cmdc.201500437
Restivo, M. R., McKinnon, M. C., Frey, B. N., Hall, G. B., & Taylor, V. H. (2016). Effect of
obesity on cognition in adults with and without a mood disorder: study design and
methods. BMJ Open, 6(2), e009347. http://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009347
Criteria
with
Professio
nal
Standards
Reference
d
5
Exemplary
(97 100%)
4
Highl
y
Profi
cient
(93
96%)
3
Proficient
(83 92%)
2
Appr
oachi
ng
Profi
cient
(73
82%)
1
Unsatisfactory
(72%
and below)
9-10 Points
7-8
Points
5-6 Points
3-4
Points
1-2 Points
Outline
Turned
In(Already
submitted
for points)
Logical, detailed
outline with at
least 5 original
peer reviewed
references written
in APA format is
submitted with a
technology choice
selected to embed
the assignment.
Brief
outlin
e
with
at
least
5
origin
al
peer
revie
wed
refere
nces
writte
n in
APA
forma
t is
subm
itted.
Brief
outlin
e
with
one
or no
refere
nces
subm
itted.
No outline was
submitted.
Introducti
on
9-10 Points
7-8
Points
5-6 Points
3-4
Points
1-2 Points
Intro
ducti
on is
addre
ssed
adequ
ately.
Introduction is
omitted or was
disorganized and did
not create a plan for
the paper.
Outline
Introducti
on to the
topic and
overview
(In your
purpose
statement
also
introduce
all
subtopics)
Introduction is
fully developed,
well organized,
introduces all
topics, created a
plan for the paper
and invites the
reader to read
further.
Intro
ducti
on is
fully
devel
oped
with
all
topics
introd
uced.
Introduction is
addressed well,
somewhat
organized and
created a plan for
the paper
13-15 Points
10-12
Points
6-9 Points
5-7
Points
1. Literature
review highlights
major issues in the
area.
2. Through use of
a range of
references to
support key issues.
1.
Litera
ture
revie
w
addre
sses
major
issues
in the
area.
2.
Thor
ough
use of
a
range
of
refere
nces
to
suppo
rt key
issues
.
1. Literature
review may
address major
issues, but issues
may not be
supported with
expert knowledge.
1.
Litera
ture
revie
w
does
not
addre
ss the
major
issues
in the
area;
the
level
of
suppo
rt for
the
issues
is not
adequ
ate.
3. Description of
important studies
establishes context
for the reader.
4. Includes more
than 5 informative
references.
3.
Inclu
des
descri
ption
s of
2. Good use of
references, but
additional
references may
have strengthened
the paper.
3. Includes 4
references.
2.
Inclu
des 3
refere
nces.
1-4 Points
1. Literature review
does not have the
depth of knowledge
appropriate to this
upper level course.
2. Includes less than
2 references.
13-15 Points
10-12
Points
1. Studies covering
the same topic
synthesize related
research.
Studi
es
cover
ing
the
same
topic
are
sum
mariz
ed
and
integr
ated
level
work.
2. Described
similar or differing
and detailed
themes throughout
the articles
3. Demonstrate
thoroughly how
your research and
the data collected
supports your
stance on why
your healthy and
active school plan
is not only
important for hope
and engagement at
your school and in
your community,
6-9 Points
Information is
presented studyby-study rather
than summarized
by topic.
2. Described
similar or differing
themes throughout
the articles which
were not detailed
3. Somewhat
demonstrated how
your research and
the data collected
supports your
stance on why
your healthy and
active school plan
is not only
important for hope
and engagement at
your school and in
5-7
Points
1-4 Points
The
literat
ure
revie
w is a
mixe
d set
of
ideas
witho
ut a
partic
ular
focus.
but ties to
academic success
in your classroom
as well.
your community,
but ties to
academic success
in your classroom
as well.
27-30 Points
23-26
Points
1. Practical
implications of
your event details
including your
teaching level and
in a particular
setting are
discussed
thoroughly. A
minimum of 6
topics are applied.
1.
Practi
cal
impli
catio
ns are
discu
ssed
but
not
relate
d to a
partic
ular
teachi
ng
settin
g or
topic
or
certai
n
detail
s are
missi
ng.
2. Contains
thorough
discussion on how
each of the 6
program/compone
nts that are in
place are
organized,
conducted, and
overseen or a
detailed plan about
how each
component can be
added.
3. All
programs/compone
nts implemented
include discussion
on modifications
for those with
disabilities.
4. Contained
discussion on a
19-22 Points
1. Practical
implications are
discussed but not
at a particularly
level or in a
particular setting
and many details
of your event are
missing.
2. Contained at
least 4-5
components of a
comprehensive
school program;
however, some of
the needed detail is
missing.
3. Most
programs/compone
nts implemented
include discussion
on modifications
for those with
disabilities.
4. Technology
infusion was used
but it did not
enhance the
proposal
1.
Practi
cal
impli
catio
ns are
not
thoro
ughly
discu
ssed
and
only
a few
detail
s of
the
event
are
prese
nt
1-14 Points
1. Practical
implications are not
discussed and no
details of the event
are present.
2. Contained 3 or
fewer components of
a comprehensive
school program
3. Contains little
discussion on which
programs/component
s are currently in
place
4. Few
programs/component
s implemented
include discussion
on modifications for
those with
disabilities.
5. Technology
infusion was not
used.
9-10 Points
Major issues
support and
establish
conclusions.
7-8
Points
The
major
issues
are
sum
mariz
ed
under
concl
usion
s.
5-6 Points
The conclusions
are not complete.
3-4
Points
Provi
des
opini
ons,
but
not a
sum
mary
of
findin
gs.
1-2 Points
No conclusions are
included.
9-10 Points
7-8
Points
5-6 Points
3-4
Points
1-2 Points
Detailed draft of
all sections of the
paper with
appropriate
content, headers,
writing style, a
choice of
technology to
embed the
assignment and
references in APA
6.0 style.
Detai
led
draft
of
ALL
sectio
ns
with
some
errors
in
conte
nt
cover
ed,
headi
ngs,
Detailed draft of
MOST sections
with some errors
in content covered,
headings, writing
style and/or
references in APA
6.0 style.
Missi
ng
sectio
ns or
paper
has
regul
ar
errors
acros
s
conte
nt
cover
ed,
headi
ngs,
Incomplete (missing
half of the
requirements) or
completely missing
paper.
Integration
of
instructor
comments
from first
draft
(SubSection of
Writing
and
Referencin
g)
All comments
from instructor
integrated into
final version. All
were highlighted
in yellow
Writing
and
referencin
g style
(SubSection of
Writing
and
Referencin
g)
1. Cover page
included, proper
spelling and
grammar, all
references in APA
6.0 style. Paper
was appropriate
length (at least 5
pages)
2. The file
document name
contains
Lastname.firstnam
e.assignment#.cour
writin
g
style
and/o
r
refere
nces
in
APA
6.0
style.
Most
com
ments
from
instru
ctor
integr
ated
into
final
versi
on.
All
were
highli
ghted
in
yello
w
1.
Cove
r
page
inclu
ded,
few
gram
matic
al
errors
and
missp
elling
s, all
Some comments
from instructor
integrated into
final version. Most
were highlighted
in yellow
1. Cover page
included, some
grammatical errors
and misspellings,
some errors in
referencing style
APA 6.0.
2. Paper was too
short for the topic
(3-4 pages)
3. The file name
somewhat contains
the
writin
g
style
and/o
r
refere
nces
in
APA
6.0
style.
Very
few
com
ments
from
instru
ctor
integr
ated
into
final
versi
on.
Most
were
highli
ghted
in
yello
w
1.
Cove
r
page
not
inclu
ded,
many
gram
matic
al
errors
and
missp
elling
No comments from
instructor integrated
into final version.
The changes were
not highlighted
refere
nces
in
APA
6.0
style.
2.
Paper
was
appro
priate
lengt
h (at
least
5
pages
)
Lastname.firstnam
e.assignment#.cour
se#
4. This rubric was
added but not at
the end of the
document
submitted
5. Most sentences
are clear and well
developed
6. Proposals and
events are mostly
appropriate length
with standard
margins, font, and
size of text
s,
some
errors
in
refere
ncing
style
APA
6.0.
Lastname.firstname.
assignment#.course#
4. This rubric was
not added to the
document submitted
2.
Paper
was
too
short
for
the
topic
(1-2
pages
)
6. Proposals and
events are not of
appropriate length
with larger than
standard margins,
font and size of text
5. Many sentences
are not clear and
underdeveloped