Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction
New graduate nurses represent 10% of the nursing workforce
Largest source of registered nurses available for nurses
Expected to transition into professional practice straight from school,
with many students having little experience
Many hospitals with new graduate nurses experienced high turnover
rates, decreased retention and disatisfaction with their jobs
New graduate programs were created to provide new nurses with
extra training and help transition into
(Welding, 2011)
What is the best practice for new graduate nurses transitioning out of
nursing school into the workforce?
What is the effect on new graduate nurses (P) who participate in hospitals with new
graduate nursing programs (I) compared to hospitals that do not offer these programs
(C), when considering burnout and retention rates (O) within their first year (T) of
working?
Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome
To improve new graduate nurse retention rates and to decrease burnout rates
Time
Local results:
Hospitals in Tucson that have a New Grad Program
Banner UMC, Tucson Medical Center, Carondalet
There is no standardized new graduate program in Tucson
Hospitals in Tucson/near Tucson that do not have a New Grad Program
Northwest Medical Center
Oro Valley hospital
Green Valley hospital
State results: Hospitals in Arizona are not required to have a New Graduate Nursing
Program
Example of an accredited hospital with a New Graduate Nursing Program: Mayo-clinic: (1
year)
Goal: To provide new nurses with education and support in developing decision-making
abilities and knowledge, while enhancing technical skills (Mayo Foundation, 2016).
One-on-one Preceptor:
-Length of time with preceptors varies by specific unit and each individuals learning needs
(Mayo Foundation, 2016).
Example: The University Healthsystem Consortium & American Association of Colleges of Nursing
(The national voice for baccalaureate and graduate nursing education)
187 practice sites in 32 states offer the year-long residency program, with average retention rates at 95%. More than 40,000 nurses have
completed the program (AACN, 2016).
Goal: Develop a standardized residency program to take the novice learner from new graduate to more competent provider.
Framework: Formal curriculum of year long residencies, including:
-In depth development of leadership skills
-Analysis of evidence through reviews of literature
-Application of outcome data to improve patient care
-Professional development
(Structured informal sessions lead by Resident Facilitator)
-End of the year Evidence Based Project (AACN, 2016).
Critical Thinking Development using Case Scenarios
-Based on actual scenarios that have occurred at participating hospitals
-Professional reflection
-Comparing scenarios with other scenarios, personal experiences, different symptoms/diagnoses, alternative approaches
-Assessment tools by HESI/Elsevier (AACN, 2016).
Strengths:
Limitations:
Evidence-based Recommendations
Siew Wong
Implementation
Nursing Residency Program
Alexus Milobar
Cunningham-Spinks Hospital
30 new graduate RN
30 RN preceptors (2 year minimum nursing experience)
Program layout
Estimated cost analysis
Incentives
Benefits
Leadership skills
Evaluation
Program, preceptor, self evaluation
Cost Analysis
2 Nursing Educators
Average salary: $78,000/year
Total= $156,000/program
30 New Graduate RN
Average New Grad salary: $30/hour
Total per New Grad= $56,160/year
Total= $1,684,800/ program
Total Program Cost
$ 1,840,800
Contingency: $20,000
GRAND TOTAL= $1,860,800
RISKS
BENEFITS
1.
1.
1.
Limited resources
1.
2.
1.
3.
(Bliech, 2012)
RISKS
BENEFITS
6 weeks to 3 months
too brief to achieve expected levels of
clinical competency and professional
confidence.
1. Mentoring projects:
a. improved study skills, critical
thinking skills, understanding of
content, clinical time management
skills, confidence levels, and overall
clinical performance.
2. Mentees receive:
a. more promotions, have higher
salaries, exert greater influence, and
are more satisfied with their jobs
and careers compared to nonmentees.
(Bliech, 2012)
RISKS
1. Nursing turnover
a. Disrupts health care teams
b. Impacts the delivery of quality care
to their patients.
BENEFITS
1. Participation in New Graduate
programs:
a. Increased patient safety and
communication.
2. First 6 months
a. Focus on internal issues
i. clinical practice
ii. personal identity
iii. coping strategies
3. Second 6 months
a. Focus on external issues
i. patients
ii. the healthcare team
iii. extending their learning
Evaluation/Outcomes
Tess Graettinger
Retention rates
Job satisfaction
Burnout
Recommendation on how to improve/change the NRP to be more
effective
Outcome:
1. The new graduate nurse will work at the same institution where
he or she completed the NRP for at least one year post program.
2. Throughout the duration of the 1-year NRP, the new graduate
nurse will verbalize and demonstrate three strategies he or she
can use when experiencing increased stress and excessive
fatigue to reduce the likelihood of burnout.
Summary
Sean
The issues involved include that 6% of new graduate nurses lead the nursing
workforce. Nurses also experience stress and increased workload without help
transitioning from school.
Best practice
total cost of $1,800,000, this an affordable budget for the Cunningham-Spinks Hospital.
Compared to other NRP programs nationwide.
Thank you
Sean Chester
New nursing graduate programs are no way a quick solution for nursing
turnover and retention rates. However, evidence from the many
sources obtained in this presentation for example support our
question that in fact, new graduate nursing programs do have a
profound impact on new graduate nurses. They directly reduce
burnout rates within the first year of working and the programs meet
individual needs that help to increase retention rates in the hospital
care setting.
Now, many hospitals and facilities across the country are increasing
budget costs in order to implement new graduate nursing and
residency programs to increase nursing leadership and satisfaction
among this population.
References
Bleich, M. (2012). In praise of nursing residency programs. American nurse today, 7(5), 47-49.
Friday, L., Zoller, J. S., Hollerbach, A. D., Jones, K., & Knofczynski, G. (2015). The Effects of a Prelicensure Extern Program and Nurse
Residency Program on New Graduate Outcomes and Retention. Journal for Nurses in Professional Development, 31(3), 151157.
Kenny, P., Reeve, R., & Hall, J. (2016). Satisfaction with nursing education, job satisfaction, and work intentions of new
graduate nurses. Nurse education today, 36, 230-235.
Kowalski, S., & Cross, C. L. (2010). Preliminary outcomes of a local residency programme for new graduate registered nurses. Journal
of Nursing Management, 18(1), 96-104.
Introducing the UHN/AACN Nurse Residency Program Marketing Tool Kit Available. (February 2016). American Association of
Colleges of Nursing. Retrieved from: http://www.aacn.nche.edu/education-resources/nurse-residency-program
New Grads and New Beginnings at TMC. (12 June 2014). Tucson Medical Center. Retrieved from: http://tmcaznews.com
/2014/06/12/new-grads-and-new-beginnings-at-tmc/
Rosenfeld, P., Glassman, K., & Capobianco, E. (2015). Evaluating the short and long-term outcomes of a post-BSN residency
program: Findings of a retrospective study of nurse residents, 2005-2012. The Journal of Nursing Administration, 45(6), 331-338.
doi: 10.1097/NNA.0000000000000211