10/2/Reuben

Maximilius IV
History of the Gods, I
Naum, Fuan, Hyap. These names are known throughout Rodengar,
as guardians of mankind and creators of our world. However, the earliest
known archaeological records point to a far more interesting truth that
there were four gods, not merely three. The fate of this fourth deity is
unknown, as is why he (or she) has refused to reassert themselves, but this
essay intends to delve into the archaeological history of the three known
gods and this fourth unknown god.
Following the disyllabic consonant vowel vowel consonant pattern of
the nomenclature of the preceding deities, it could by hypothesized that this
fourth deity has a similar title. It can easily be determined that because the
names of the deities are determined by the descriptions of their primordial
elements and in the case of the second syllable, reversed to mirror the first
the nomenclature pattern of the third deity would follow suit. In this case,
we have:

Naum; can be broken down into Na, for Nestellium and

Aprodyxia, and Um representing Untillius and Mulindia (or in

reverse order, Mulindia and Untillius).

Hyap; similarly, can be deciphered into Herodophilis and Yius,
combined with the Alphyxius and Pertosium to effectively and

efficiently describe the nature of the entity

Fuan; broken down into Funtilum and Unudox and combined with
Alphyxius and Nestillium (much in the fashion of a combination
of the previous two), can be seen to represent his patronage as
well.

It follows, then, that the name of our mysterious fourth deity must be
based on the elements of his primordial essence. Given the natures of the
already accounted for deities, we know that the elements of life which
compose nature, order, and civilization are the domains of the aformentioned
three. What, then, is left to a fourth?

10/2/Reuben
Maximilius IV
History of the Gods, I
While all of these compose the structure of any given plane, the
structure between planes is unlisted and unaccounted for when tallying up
the marks of the great creators of our time. This means that the essence of
the planes and the fragile web of trods and groves which connects them
must be encoded into primordial essence.
The choice of Malixandum for the ethereal nature of the mist which
surrounds any plane is a given. Undillialus or Tumax for the fabric of trods or
portals. Naziumilia is a relatively sure choice for the void between planes,
while Ynteria is clearly correct for the everlasting nature of the planes and
the celestial structure.
Thus, by organizing the names according to the preceding pattern, we
understand this fourth deity to be Mtny or Muny. Following the pattern, we
realize that Mtny is not a viable name and thus we are left with Muny.
Remembering to mirror the second syllable of the name, we end up with
Muyn. In determining this, we have discovered that the fourth deity of the
celestial order is named by the terms Muyn, and is the patron of the planar
structure of the universe. Where to, then, did this entity go? Why has he not
reasserted himself?
The answer to the former question is neigh impossible to determine
without further access to more detailed information. Any number of
possibilities could be true; he may have retreated from the world to
contemplate, or equally have fallen into a slumber of an ancient kind. He
may have been killed or banished by some other entity of immeasurable
power, or the very nature of his essence may have simply faded him out of
existence, never to be or have been. Alternately, none of these could be
true and a further unconsidered option may have presented itself.
Altogether, however, it seems as though he would not have reasserted
himself for one of two reasons. Either he was unable to do so, or he chose
not to do so. If he chose not to do so, then I greatly suspect there is little

10/2/Reuben
Maximilius IV
History of the Gods, I
any of us could ever do to change his mind. If he was unable to, however,
this presents a different matter entirely. The knowledge of such a being
would be unmeasurably empowering, and the debt of freedom would be
great. Further investigation may prove fruitful.
Naum, Fuan, Hyap. These names are known throughout Rodengar,

This is the essence

These records are

of his argument
as guardians
of mankind and creators of our world. However, the earliest
now stored at our

compound
known
archaeologicalinrecords point to a far more interesting truth that
Drangar

there were four gods, not merely three. The fate of this fourth deity is
unknown, as is why he (or she) has refused to reassert themselves, but this
essay intends to delve into the archaeological history of the three known
gods and this fourth unknown god.
Following the disyllabic consonant vowel vowel consonant pattern of
the nomenclature of the preceding deities, it could by hypothesized that this
fourth deity has a similar title. It can easily be determined that because the
names of the deities are determined by the descriptions of their primordial
elements and in the case of the second syllable, reversed to mirror the first
the nomenclature pattern of the third deity would follow suit. In this case,
we have:

Naum; can be broken down into Na, for Nestellium and

Aprodyxia, and Um representing Untillius and Mulindia (or in

reverse order, Mulindia and Untillius).

Hyap; similarly, can be deciphered into Herodophilis and Yius,
combined with the Alphyxius and Pertosium to effectively and

efficiently describe the nature of the entity

Fuan; broken down into Funtilum and Unudox and combined with
Alphyxius and Nestillium (much in the fashion of a combination
of the previous two), can be seen to represent his patronage as
well.

10/2/Reuben
Maximilius IV
History of the Gods, I
It follows, then, that the name of our mysterious fourth deity must be
based on the elements of his primordial essence. Given the natures of the

Patronage

already accounted for deities, we know that the elements of life which
compose nature, order, and civilization are the domains of the aformentioned
three. What, then, is left to a fourth?
While all of these compose the structure of any given plane, the
structure between planes is unlisted and unaccounted for when tallying up
the marks of the great creators of our time. This means that the essence of
the planes and the fragile web of trods and groves which connects them
must be encoded into primordial essence.
The choice of Malixandum for the ethereal nature of the mist which
surrounds any plane is a given. Undillialus or Tumax for the fabric of trods or
portals. Naziumilia is a relatively sure choice for the void between planes,
while Ynteria is clearly correct for the everlasting nature of the planes and
the celestial structure.
Thus, by organizing the names according to the preceding pattern, we
The name of our lord

understand this fourth deity to be Mtny or Muny. Following the pattern, we is revealed
realize that Mtny is not a viable name and thus we are left with Muny.
Remembering to mirror the second syllable of the name, we end up with
Muyn. In determining this, we have discovered that the fourth deity of the
celestial order is named by the terms Muyn, and is the patron of the planar
structure of the universe. Where to, then, did this entity go? Why has he not
reasserted himself?
The answer to the former question is neigh impossible to determine
without further access to more detailed information. Any number of
possibilities could be true; he may have retreated from the world to
contemplate, or equally have fallen into a slumber of an ancient kind. He
may have been killed or banished by some other entity of immeasurable
power, or the very nature of his essence may have simply faded him out of

10/2/Reuben
Maximilius IV
History of the Gods, I
existence, never to be or have been. Alternately, none of these could be
And yet wetrue
knowand
the truth,
a further unconsidered option
brothers. We will make them
pay for their slight against him
Altogether, however, it seems as
when he is freed

may have presented itself.

though he would not have reasserted

himself for one of two reasons. Either he was unable to do so, or he chose
not to do so. If he chose not to do so, then I greatly suspect there is little
any of us could ever do to change his mind. If he was unable to, however,
this presents a different matter entirely. The knowledge of such a being
would be unmeasurably empowering, and the debt of freedom would be
great. Further investigation may prove fruitful.

It is for this reason that we

owe Maximilius IV an
eternal debt of gratitude.
Do not forget the founder of
our order