Professional Documents
Culture Documents
and
Minimum Cost Design (MCD)
Presented by:
Jonathan D. Stevenson
Pratt & Whitney UTC
MIT Rocket Team Lecture Series
January 15, 2002
15-Jan-2002
Slide 1
Overview
What is CATS?
Why is space launch so expensive?
What are Minimum Cost Design (MCD) methodologies?
Historical MCD launch vehicles.
Recent (1990-) launch vehicles.
What about Re-usable Launch Vehicles (RLVs)?
15-Jan-2002
Slide 2
What is CATS?
15-Jan-2002
Slide 3
15-Jan-2002
Slide 4
Current costs are in the range of $7-10K/kg for man rated vehicles
Launcher
Payload to LEO
Cost per kg
Saturn V
(historical only)
118 T (includes
SIVB, 47T Apollo)
~$431M (1967)
$3,653
($9170 just
Apollo)
Space Shuttle
27.5 T
~$245M (1988,
based on 6/yr)
$8,909
Ariene IV (44L)
Ariene V
10.2 T
16 T
$125M
$180M
$12,255
$11,250
Atlas IIIA
Delta III
Titan IV
8.6 T
8.3 T
17.7 T
$105M
$90M
$400M
$12,209
$10,843
$22,599
Zenit-3SL
$90M
$6,000
$50M
$40M
$2,500
$7,272
$26M
$11M
$20M
$13,000
$27,500
$10,000
Proton
Soyuz
LM Athena-2
2T
Pegasus (OSC)
400 kg
Taurus
2000 kg
Source: www.astronautix.com
15-Jan-2002
Slide 5
15-Jan-2002
Slide 6
200 km
(A) Launch:
V = 463 m/s at Equator
V= 328 m/s at 45 degN
EARTHS ROTATION
15-Jan-2002
Slide 7
Bottom line:
Even with very good liquid fueled rockets (H2-LOX, Isp ~ 385 sec) Single
Stage to Orbit (SSTO) requires mass ratio >87%.
Situation even more restrictive with RP-1 based liquids and solid fuel.
15-Jan-2002
Slide 8
Implications:
Permits less efficient mass ratios per stage (80-85%).
Strap-on boosters, which function only during first 10-20 km of altitude gain,
can be quite low (80%).
If majority of atmosphere (<10 km) could somehow be skipped, there is a
weight savings (e.g.. Motherships, Rockoons)
15-Jan-2002
Slide 9
Aerojet used some independent research and development funding in the early
1960s to explore various cost aspects of space launchers.
Through these studies, the corporation developed a set of five design rules:
Big
Simple
Reusable
Not necessarily maximum reliability or performance
Dont push state of the art (use existing technology)
A huge MCD concept, the Sea Dragon was output of this effort.
15-Jan-2002
Slide 10
15-Jan-2002
Slide 11
15-Jan-2002
Slide 12
15-Jan-2002
Slide 13
SATURN V
(363 ft tall)
Payload 118T to LEO
15-Jan-2002
SEA DRAGON
(429 ft tall)
Payload 500T to LEO
Slide 14
Probably the largest rocket ever conceived (note size versus Saturn V).
Both stages pressurized:
First Stage RP-1/LOX, rated at 356 MN (80 Million Pounds).
Second Stage H2/LOX.
Sea launched:
Towed to offshore launch site.
Fueled, plus ballast added so vehicle stood vertical,
Launched from submerged attitude.
15-Jan-2002
Slide 15
Chrysler MCD
15-Jan-2002
McDonnell-Douglas MCD
Slide 16
15-Jan-2002
Slide 17
Rockwell MCD
15-Jan-2002
Slide 18
15-Jan-2002
Slide 19
15-Jan-2002
Slide 20
TRW has proposed a number of MCD booster concepts over the years.
Was involved in early Sea Dragon evaluation efforts, plus enjoyed remarkable
success with simple, pressure-fed rockets in 1960s, including the LEM engine.
Examples of proposed MCDs include:
MCD Liquid Strap-on Replacement for the Titan SRMs (1968).
A 9 member family of MCD Boosters for NASA (for use until 1985).
15-Jan-2002
Slide 21
15-Jan-2002
Slide 22
15-Jan-2002
Slide 23
15-Jan-2002
Slide 24
15-Jan-2002
Slide 25
15-Jan-2002
Slide 26
15-Jan-2002
Slide 27
Microcosm(1984-present)
15-Jan-2002
Slide 28
15-Jan-2002
Slide 29
15-Jan-2002
Slide 30
15-Jan-2002
Slide 31
15-Jan-2002
Slide 32
15-Jan-2002
Slide 33
15-Jan-2002
Slide 34
15-Jan-2002
Slide 35
15-Jan-2002
Slide 36
The Shuttle fleet is approaching its original design life (25 years or 100
launches) - will need replacement/upgrades soon!
NASA, as part of new Space Launch Initiative (SLI), has targeted a goal of
reducing space launch cost to $1000/lb (~$2.2K/kg).
Note that the Saturn V was able to place a 118T payload into LEO for an
average cost of $3,653 per kg in 1967!
Does SLI help or hinder truly independent non-governmental activities? (e.g.
Beal Aerospace launcher)
SLI initiatives appear aimed for 2020 and beyond, and are somewhat
muddled at the moment. (e.g. Why no X-33/X-34 support?)
15-Jan-2002
Slide 37
Summary
Which approach will ultimately carry the day? Stay tuned - the next 10 or
so years will be critical!
15-Jan-2002
Slide 38
Bibliography
Much of the material used in this presentation came from the following sources.
These are excellent resources for follow-on study:
1. LEO on the Cheap, John R. London III, Lt Col, USAF Research Report No. AU-ARI-938, Air University Press, Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama, October 1994.
(www.spacecityone.com/genastro/leocheap_ch9.htm)
2. How Much New Technology is Required for Future Reusable Launch Systems?, Dietrich
E Koelle, International Symposium on "Impact of Space Technology on Economic
Development", Shanghai/China, April 17-20, 2001.
(www.spacefuture.com/archive/how_much_new_technology_is_required_for_future_reusable_launch_systems.shtml)
15-Jan-2002
Slide 39