Oscullo / Essay: The scientific method as a tool for the development of knowledge.
Essay: The scientific method as a tool for the development of knowledge.
Jos Antonio Oscullo1 1
Student of Research Doctoral Program of FIEE, EPN Quito-Ecuador
e-mail: jose.oscullo@epn.edu.ec
an, since his appearance on earth
has questioned its environment, to meet their needs in the pursuit of achieving wellness and better conditions to develop individual and
within the society.
The society saw the need to systematize the
knowledge development, in a way structured and ordered what is known as "Science", to be transmitted and improved both for the present and future generations. This feature makes that knowledge is not stable, due mainly to the needs are changing; But if it must be fastened to a rigor established by the scientific method, which allows knowledge to be verifiable, transmissible, and adaptable. Under this context, science is the set of ideas, ever growing, through which allow man to shape their environment to respond to a problem posed. The generation of new ideas demand mechanisms to ensure the increase of knowledge, here being the scientific method; the tool throughout the development of each science that has made it possible to ensure good results. This paper presents the philosophical points of the argentine physicist and epistemologist Mario Bunge, which discusses, describes the reasons for which the scientific method is the right tool to establish the classification and characteristics of science. Given the wide range of needs that facing societies, situation that makes various science not something objective and therefore not verifiable via implemented mechanisms to solve them. For which there are two types of science; on the one hand, formal Sciences, where forms discuss and demonstrates their solution through an idealized abstraction of the problem (e.g., mathematics), i.e. does not provide information about events that occur in nature, therefore, their show will not use experience and subsequent experimentation, use the deduction as a scientific technique. They usually establish a logical system that must be respected and which arise deductions By other side, factual science that analyzes the facts through the exploration of reality and explain the different interrelations between the cause and effect of the problem as far as possible by means of mathematical expressions; obtained in the interactions observed in the experimental stages to verify through controlled acts. This process makes it possible to validate the hypotheses proposals are adequate to respond to the
problem, this must necessarily include the existing
historical knowledge about the topic. As provided, specifically formal Sciences demonstrate or prove ideas, while factual science verify tentative hypotheses, which should be demonstrated experimentally, by what the formal sciences seek to create an object to describe it completely and if the object is changed it is necessary to create a new description, while the factual science is incomplete and temporary; Since it is not possible to fully describe the differences analyzed reality relations, thus using a new hypothesis is sought the incorporation of new facts, which shape more clearly the nature. Thus, factual science is the science of the "facts" so using the reasoning and the objectivity of the researcher seeks to establish starting from axioms, concepts and experimentation combined rules logical objective systematically organized to form a system of ideas and theories that verified adapt to reality. Knowledge has been generated through experimentation and verification of the facts and therefore transcends them, due to their development can be discarded and produce new facts. In addition, factual science defines analytical problems based on the individual analysis of the elements, provides troubleshooting partial and, therefore, is not absolute. Factual science is mainly characterized by verifiability, through a scientific fact not only is valid for having demonstrated its veracity, in addition it must be reproducible and verifiable. Thus; the technique of the scientific method provides a series of steps for planning and verification of scientific hypothesis, allowing to establish the validity of the theories. As a first step, the scientific method sets the statement of the problem and the construction of theoretical models that determine the hypothesis, are defined from the research and analysis of the facts, so that there is a unique way to propose them. However, the starting point in the process of hypothesis is often based on inductive processes, analogies, and deductions. Verifiable propositions, with one sufficient degree of generality, define scientific hypothesis. Be followed when establishing the scientific hypothesis, it is necessary to find consequences for rational or already verified facts, and that allow to analyze the data considered empirically and those obtained by the proposed model.
Oscullo / Essay: The scientific method as a tool for the development of knowledge.
The crucial point of the method is the proof of the
hypothesis by means of an experiment designed and adapted that allow a proper test execution, data processing, and data collection to establish so deductive conclusions. A principal point is determined the validity of the thesis the comparison of the results of the research, the model of adjustment and suggestions for analysis and subsequent works. By its nature, the scientific method seeks the continuous improvement of the knowledge, both constants and all results will be considered as a source of new questions, thus becoming a tool for the development of science in general. By this feature the scientific method has enabled document and transfer all the advances of the scientific field that have helped the scientific community and general have a broader view of the internal and external environment of the universe. The scientific method has allowed the development of the science and the technique of a society to achieve the integration of the economic, social and political issues in parallel. Since the development of the society, always looking for a practicality and verification of knowledge, these characteristics are due in good part to the application of the scientific method, to achieve social well-being. The relevant scientific method is through his rigor in the process of obtaining the knowledge, allowing that a physical phenomenon, or social duly studied is subjected to such scientific severity, with which you can get to establish laws or theories that are transformed into temporary absolute truths from a point of view unique, reductionist that leads to the acceptance of those laws until there new approaches on the phenomenon and it is necessary to adapt theory established and thus through the doubt about whether the theory is absolute to give way to the restructuring of new knowledge about the same phenomenon in order hold or discard theories and established laws. Not only the physical phenomena, the quantifiable, measurable, the verifiable, are liable to be subject to a criterion of the scientist, but also the social aspects, as mentioned throughout this short essay, established theories that allow to understand social phenomena and the inference that have these in other character humanistic sciences. Without a doubt, the contributions of some theorists of knowledge allow reaffirm the importance that has the scientific method and evolution that it has had throughout the history of man, from empiricism as a rudimentary approach that is to do science, to find extremely complicated positions on scientific theory, to account for what can conceive as part of science to transcend such as law or scientific postulates.
All this, it is recommended that the researcher seeks
a balance between depth of research and an epistemological perspective, this last will allow scientists to optimize your effort to improve your research strategy and facilitate the correct apprehension of knowledge with the consistent management and evaluation. Finally, it should be noted that the fundamental characteristic of the scientific method is the growing and continuous development of knowledge of effectively and efficiently, however, it should be noted that the use of these features remains outside of the scientific method, and these aspects can be used for or against man, depending on the pros and cons how that uses it.
Bibliographic references [1] Bunge, M. La ciencia su mtodo y filosofa Panamericana, 2003.