The graph shows our perception on that event,

unfounded or authentic but it’s based on the

philosophy you choose, things you chose to
JOURNEY TOWARDS entertain and things you chose to ignore. Then we
ABSOLUTE EQUILIBRIUM draw the graph.

STATICS OF CHANGE
That’s it if the input is within the limits of our
We have always heard about change, felt it but
understanding we call it rational and if it goes
what does it imply, why things change, because
outside
they have to. We also change, because we have to.
then irrational, and we simply chose to ignore it.
We are involved in the most advanced form of
Many a time truth is the input, but it rejects it. To
change. A billion dollar question is:- who decides
understand it we have get out of our comfortable
logic? What truly is logic? What are the reasons?
frame of reference.
So in this world there are as many frame of
Today we stand in a scientific society where it is
references as there are people. Some times one
easier for us to understand the scope and wonders
frame of reference does not match with other frame
of science. But still if we ask you something fanciful
and wars happen like in matters of religion, sex etc.
you won’t take it seriously or discard it as a
There are some frames of reference which justify
fascination. Today fields like nanotechnology have
murder, rape. Some frame of references which
started to show some promise. To minds of leading
justify eating non-veg food, but not in some others.
scientific vanguards its conceivable. But if it had
We live in a world so widely divided that there is no
been asked a decade ago we would have been
conceivable rational ground to explain all the
called mad. So the question is, what truly is
disparity, and deviances. The fact is the absence of
rationality? With time science has also changed in
rational ground that explains every thing and even
its character. But ultimately it’s all venerable. With
if it is there, do people take it as it is in QUR’AN,
every passing second our perception to life is
BIBLE etc, or read them in the same way as they
changing. We are witnessing a paradigm shift.
were written.
But we think there is one absolute truth and rational
With our understanding of life we react or interact
ground which explains everything although no one
with life. Understandingly, everyone has his own
has been able to explain it properly. The graph
idea of life. For some people if I go and talk about
explains that idea.
death, they would repel they just want to live life by
simply discarding the existence of death. But some
people spend their life exploring the untouched
corners of eternal truth. So this makes our point
very clear that every person has a perspective of
life that is unfounded, far from reality but
manipulated to suit him, comfort him. But these do
not change the ultimate truth. To judge good or bad,
our effort, success and others character we need a
base on which we can do this calculation. To live
by the rules and principles, to keep in mind
relentless truth is very unnerving, so people do not
live life based on these but they manufacture their
own grounds their own philosophy, their own
dimensions to gauge life.

What will you do if I ask you to draw a graph

between two variables. You would simply assume
a scale, draw the coordinate axes and draw the
graph. That is what we do when we see things
happen in world when we take a pencil and draw
the axes , based on the outlook we chose for life.

Figure 1: The absolute equilibrium is shown with
largest dimensions with each of its dimension being
the “Truth” i.e. the ultimate reality which explains
everything. Other smaller individual frame of
references from 1 to N ( N being any positive
integer) add up to form the absolute equilibrium.
Even science has a reference with time and with
complicated calculations being done we are able to
select a frame of reference which can
accommodates more deviances, and give a
rational ground to things. Some references find
themselves in the wrong side of history. Some are
close to truth. But most of them are infinitely far.
Some works by great minds gave direction to
misguided human society. They touched the truth.
EQUILIBRIUM
Why do things happen, water falls from a waterfall
and river flows ceaselessly towards the sea? Why
does the tea get cold, Apple falls on earth? Why
does a ball in motion will always remain in motion?
The answer is every change in this world is
directed towards attainment of equilibrium. You
earn money because while you are poor you think
this is not where you want to be, your equilibrium
state is richness (as you think). So everything is
progressing towards its equilibrium so after some
time things should attain their equilibrium and
change should stop but its not so. It continues even
after that.
There are two types of equilibrium, one
relative and other absolute.
Suppose I am travelling in a train and I have placed
a book on the table. The book as well as the table
are in perfect equilibrium with each other. But to a
person standing outside neither the book nor the
table are in equilibrium. To him they are in motion
and hence not in equilibrium. So this is called
relative equilibrium.
But the most important thing is that when two
things change to attain equilibrium they in the
process disturb the equilibrium of others. So this
makes change go on and on. Infinite variables
have infinite permutation and combinations and
absolute equilibrium is a singular event or a
password which is an exact combination of Infinite
variables. This makes change go on and on to
attain absolute equilibrium. But we won’t stop here
we would go further to understand this from the
root.
Now you can apply this equilibrium to yourself, to
form an analogical interpretation and inference.
INTERPRETATION
We have our own frame of references, based on
which we do things to attain equilibrium. Based on
set of variables we choose to acknowledge, every
individual has a different equilibrium state.
With passing time we change, so a new
equilibrium. But why do we move from one
equilibrium state to another. Because all these are
pseudo equilibriums. Equilibriums which we attain
as a step towards the absolute equilibrium.
VEDANT
Now comes the most important part on which
everything is founded. What is the thing that has
helped you to understand almost all the things in
your life. You may not have acknowledged it but it’s
the basis of your calculation. It’s a simple equation,
which is L.H.S = R.H.S.
Universally applicable. Isn’t it? Of Course, answer
would be “Yes”
Now we will go deep into the genesis of human
evolution we will find:
1) Life evolved from a single cell organism.
2) Then various complicated life forms evolved
3) Finally humans came.
4) Humans themselves are evolving over
thousands of years.
Now the questions that comes is:
How from the non-living the life emerged?
for a moment dispensing the above argument, how
life evolved from a single cell to such an advanced
form like us?
Now what is strange is the fact that (assuming that
the there was no intelligence at the beginning) how
did this single cell evolved in a rational, extremely
intelligent way to form such a complex biological
environment, and reached to us.
The equation L.H.S. = R.H.S says there can be no
intelligence at the end if it were not in the beginning.
It seems that the single cell was behaving with
instinct. The rational logic says that intelligence has
to be present in the beginning.The Vedas says that
if you want to understand the whole system , just
study the representative sub system. If you want to
know the whole beach, just understand a single
grain of sand
To understand the whole cycle of evolution just
study any life cycle.
Say lets study life cycle of tree—
Tree comes from the seed , then it grows, it bears
fruits and then finally shrinks and dies. What it
leaves behind is seeds. From the seeds it came
and into the seeds it goes. So does indicates every
life.
That means that life evolves from something and
finally dissolves into that thing. What it also implies
as we see from our current civilization, we are
progressing in an ever increasing way. Every day
something new is invented. What seems to be
impossible now becomes possible tomorrow.
This is nothing but uncoiling of intelligence, from
the very beginning intelligence was present. What
happened was the manifestation of the intelligence,
slowly and steadily the intelligence will reveal itself.
That is what is happening today, uncoiling of
intelligence in a precedent way. Most importantly
it’s us who are the instrument of the historic event.
The intelligence is revealing itself in gross form. But
when it has fully manifested in the gross form then
it will move to more subtle realms. So the
intelligence is uncoiling itself. It would end when
there will only be intelligence. At the beginning
there was only intelligence, so will it be there at the
end.
These two points are the absolute equilibrium
points, say E1 and E2.
Figure 2:Here E1 and E2 show the Absolute
equilibrium depicting that the intelligence started
from the original source or reality or equilibrium and
will end revealing the same source or reality or
equilibrium.
ABSOLUTE EQUILIBRIUM
“athaato brahma jigyasaa”(Vedantasutra) (means
Inquiry is the fundamental quality of life)
“Kaamasya nendriya-pritir labho jiveta yaavataa
Jivasya tattva-jigyasaa naartho yas ceha
karmabhih” (Srimadbhagavatam) (means Life’s
desires should never be directed towards sense
gratification. One should desire only a healthy life,
or self preservation, since a human being is meant
for inquiry about the Absolute Truth(ultimate reality).
Nothing else should be the goal of one’s works)
When everything is changing in this world, then
what is equilibrium? Equilibrium as described
earlier is relative or absolute. But if we see around
us, everywhere relative equilibrium is prevalent.
There is nothing called absolute equilibrium
because everything is changing. But both Science
and Spirituality are going towards something, which
they call, the absolute truth (1). And that is what we
call the absolute equilibrium.
Now Science is purely based on the reason, earlier
Scientists laughed at the idea of universe being
created out of nothing, but once the Quantum
physics arrived, everything seems to be possible
now to them. The law of cause and effect fails in
the quantum physics. It’s totally unpredictable
(2).This means we can’t apply physical laws in
quantum physics. This also shows that absolute
equilibrium which we are talking about, thus cannot
be fully explained or achieved by physical laws.
Einstein believed in God as a creator after closely
watching the complex system with universe as
being highly organised but couldn’t go further to
know the absolute truth which he tried through his
Unified field theory(he spent his last 30 years on it)
(3). He tried to show that all of the nature is
ultimately under the control of a single super force.
But, no one has been able to arrive at its solution
till now. Even Stephen hawking tried it to find a
“Theory of everything” (3) but without any success.
He says that it may not be possible to formulate a
theory of Universe in a finite number of statements.
Similarly Kurt Godel (1906-1978) proved that, any
system a mathematician would want to use – there
are true statements that cannot be proven. Thus
Godel’s theorem points out a basic limitation of
science.
(Basically, Godel’s theorem says that if there is any
mathematical system( which involves the integers
0,1,2,3...., then there are questions in the system
which cannot be answered by using the rules which
define the system. To answer a given question,
one may create a new rule so that the question at
hand gets answered. (of course, the new rule will
have to be determined in such a way that it does
not in any way contradict the earlier rules) But,
after including the new rule among the rules of the
system, we shall get a new system to which
Godel’s theorem shall be applicable. Now, there
will be a new questions that cannot be answered
by using the rules of the (new) system. To answer
a given new question, we can add a new rule to the
new system, but this will create another, newer,
system that will have questions that cannot be
answered using the rules of the (newer) system.
And so on. In other words, whatever set of rules we
shall ever have shall always fall short of answering
all the question. And this is the basic limitation of
science) (4)
THEN HOW TO ACHIEVE THE ABSOLUTE
EQUILIBRIUM ???
We have already seen that Absolute Equilibrium
can’t be achieved through physical laws. Then the
question is how to achieve it. We have already
shown in Figure 1 that how the different frame of
references exist under the one single frame of
reference. Same is the case here. Relative
Equilibriums exist as tiny droplets against the
Absolute Equilibrium. We know about Relative
Equilibriums because we are adapt to its system.
We act according the relative system and thus try
to find solution through our own viewpoints relative
to each other. Atleast this points a fundamental
truth, that to know about the particular system, you
have to be like that (according to its rules) and you
have to act accordingly. So, this means if we want
to know about or to reach or to perceive the
Absolute truth or equilibrium then we have to think
and act that high level which is beyond the realm of
relative thinking and acting.
I think if we can do that, then the aim is not far.
GUIDED BY THE INVISIBLE HAND OR FORCE
THE UNIVERSE MOVES TOWARD A ABSOLUTE
EQUILIBRIUM STATE
“Not-being was not, being was not then,
one breathed windless of its own power,
beyond this there was naught what so ever,
root of being, in the not-being was found,
by the sages tracing it with understanding
in their heart.” (5)
CONCLUSION
An equilibrium in a normal sense is a pseudo
equilibrium. Things will have to undergo infinite
pseudo equilibrium to reach ultimate absolute
equilibrium
Humans are very important because most
important , critical thing is happening in them. The
absolute equilibrium is nothing but what we call
God.
We all are moving towards that reality and
ultimately reach there.
References
1. William D. Phillips, Tattvajajnasa magazine,
2007,
Vol. 1, pp 29
2. The Cosmic Blueprint (Chapter 1, Page 5)
3. Dr. T.D. Singh, Tattvajajnasa magazine, 2007,
Vol. 1, pp 35
4. Jagdish N. Srivastava, Tattvajijnasa Magazine,
Vol. 1,
pp.43
5. Rig Veda, Chapter 10- Verse 129