Intertype Relationships - Reverse Engineering

Person A (rows)
Person B

MBTI

(columns)

socionics

ENTP
ISFJ
ESFJ
INTP
ENFJ
ISTP
ESTP
INFJ
ESFP
INTJ
ENTJ
ISFP
ESTJ
INFP
ENFP
ISTJ

ILE = ENTp
SEI = ISFp
ESE = ESFj
LII = INTj
EIE = ENFj
LSI = ISTj
SLE = ESTp
IEI = INFp
SEE = ESFp
ILI = INTp
LIE = ENTj
ESI = ISFj
LSE = ESTj
EII = INFj
IEE = ENFp
SLI = ISTp

ENTP
ILE = ENTp

ISFJ
SEI = ISFp

ESFJ
ESE = ESFj

INTP
LII = INTj

ENFJ
EIE = ENFj

ISTP
LSI = ISTj

Idn
Dlt
Act
Mrr
Bn <
Sp <
Lkl
Ill
Ego
Cnt
Qid
Cnf
Bn ^
Sp ^
Cmp
Sdl

Dlt
Idn
Mrr
Act
Sp <
Bn <
Ill
Lkl
Cnt
Ego
Cnf
Qid
Sp ^
Bn ^
Sdl
Cmp

Act
Mrr
Idn
Dlt
Cmp
Sdl
Bn ^
Sp ^
Qid
Cnf
Ego
Cnt
Lkl
Ill
Bn <
Sp <

Mrr
Act
Dlt
Idn
Sdl
Cmp
Sp ^
Bn ^
Cnf
Qid
Cnt
Ego
Ill
Lkl
Sp <
Bn <

Bn ^
Sp ^
Cmp
Sdl
Idn
Dlt
Act
Mrr
Bn <
Sp <
Lkl
Ill
Ego
Cnt
Qid
Cnf

Sp ^
Bn ^
Sdl
Cmp
Dlt
Idn
Mrr
Act
Sp <
Bn <
Ill
Lkl
Cnt
Ego
Cnf
Qid

ESTP
INFJ
SLE = ESTp IEI = INFp

ESFP
SEE = ESFp

INTJ
ILI = INTp

ENTJ
LIE = ENTj

ISFP
ESI = ISFj

ESTJ
LSE = ESTj

INFP
EII = INFj

Ego
Cnt
Qid
Cnf
Bn ^
Sp ^
Cmp
Sdl
Idn
Dlt
Act
Mrr
Bn <
Sp <
Lkl
Ill

Cnt
Ego
Cnf
Qid
Sp ^
Bn ^
Sdl
Cmp
Dlt
Idn
Mrr
Act
Sp <
Bn <
Ill
Lkl

Qid
Cnf
Ego
Cnt
Lkl
Ill
Bn <
Sp <
Act
Mrr
Idn
Dlt
Cmp
Sdl
Bn ^
Sp ^

Cnf
Qid
Cnt
Ego
Ill
Lkl
Sp <
Bn <
Mrr
Act
Dlt
Idn
Sdl
Cmp
Sp ^
Bn ^

Bn <
Sp <
Lkl
Ill
Ego
Cnt
Qid
Cnf
Bn ^
Sp ^
Cmp
Sdl
Idn
Dlt
Act
Mrr

Sp <
Bn <
Ill
Lkl
Cnt
Ego
Cnf
Qid
Sp ^
Bn ^
Sdl
Cmp
Dlt
Idn
Mrr
Act

Ill
Lkl
Sp <
Bn <
Mrr
Act
Dlt
Idn
Sdl
Cmp
Sp ^
Bn ^
Cnf
Qid
Cnt
Ego

Lkl
Ill
Bn <
Sp <
Act
Mrr
Idn
Dlt
Cmp
Sdl
Bn ^
Sp ^
Qid
Cnf
Ego
Cnt

http://www.socionics.com/rel/relcht.htm
http://pstypes.blogspot.com/2009/03/myers-briggs-compatibility-part-1.html
http://www.sociotype.com

Homo/Heter
Homoverted
Heteroverted
Homoverted
Heteroverted
Homoverted
Heteroverted

Symm/Asym
Symmetrical
Symmetrical
Symmetrical
Symmetrical
Asymmetrical
Asymmetrical

Rhythm/Arhy LII=INTj's B-type

Idn
Dlt
Act
Mrr
Bn <
Sp <

Look-alike

Lkl

Homoverted

Symmetrical

Rhythmical

Illusionary

Ill

Heteroverted

Symmetrical

Rhythmical

Super-Ego
Contrary
Quasi-identical
Conflicting
Benefit ^
Supervision ^

Ego
Cnt
Qid
Cnf
Bn ^
Sp ^

Homoverted
Heteroverted
Homoverted
Heteroverted
Homoverted
Heteroverted

Symmetrical
Symmetrical
Symmetrical
Symmetrical
Asymmetrical
Asymmetrical

Rhythmical
Rhythmical
Arhythmical
Arhythmical
Arhythmical
Arhythmical

Comparative

Cmp

Homoverted

Symmetrical

Rhythmical

Sdl

Heteroverted

Symmetrical

Rhythmical

Identical
Duality
Activity
Mirror
Benefit <
Supervision <

Semi-dual

PersonalityPage
Keirsey
Pierce (CelebrityTypes)

Rhythmical
Rhythmical
Arhythmical
Arhythmical
Arhythmical
Arhythmical

INTP
= LII = INTj
Thinker

ESI = ISFj
LIE = ENTj
ILI = INTp
SEE = ESFp
SLI = ISTp
IEE = ENFp
LSI = ISTj

(p > j)
(p > j)

(p > j)
(if p)

(if j)
(if p)

(if j)

(j > p)

(j > p)

Dominant
D
i
T
A
~A
~T

INFP
ESTJ

~I
~D

A
T

ISFP
ENTJ
INTJ
ESFP
ISTJ
ENFP
ISTP

~I
~D
~A
~T
T
A
D

ENFJ

(if p)

(j > p)

(j > p)
(j > p)

(if j)

Stack A vs. B
Auxiliary
Tertiary
A
T
T
A
I
D
D
I
~D
~I
~I
~D

Inferior
I
D
A
T
~T
~A

Dominant
D
i
T
A
T
A

Inferior
I
D
A
T
A
T

T
A

~D
~I

~I
~D

A
T

T
A

~D
~I

~T
~A
~D
~I
~D
~I
~T

~A
~T
~I
~D
~I
~D
~A

~D
~I
~T
~A
A
T
I

~I
~D
~A
~T
~A
~T
D

~T
~A
~D
~I
I
D
~T

~A
~T
~I
~D
D
I
~A

~D
~I
~T
~A
~T
~A
I

~A

~T

~A

~T

(if p)
EIE = ENFj

(if p)
(if j)

(if p)
(if j)

ISFJ

ESFJ

INTP

ENFJ

ISTP

ESTP

INFJ

ESFP

INTJ

ENTJ

ISFP

ESTJ

INFP

ENFP

ISTJ

SEI = ISFp
Nurturer
Protector

ESE = ESFj
Caregiver
Provider

LII = INTj
Thinker
Architect

EIE = ENFj
Giver
Teacher

LSI = ISTj
Mechanic
Crafter

SLE = ESTp
Doer
Promoter

IEI = INFp
Protector
Counselor

ILI = INTp
Scientist
Mastermind

LIE = ENTj
Executive
Field Marshal

EII = INFj
Idealist
Healer

IEE = ENFp
Inspirer
Champion

SLI = ISTp
Duty Fulfiller
Inspector

Guardian

Cooperator

Abstractionist

Complier?

Dreamer

Searcher

Solidifier?

Bonvivant /
Enthusiast
Facilitator
Caretaker

Critic /
Mastermind
Designer
Theorizer
Rationalist,
Philosopher

ESI = ISFj
Artist
Composer
Expressive
artist
Mediator /
Peacemaker
Composer
Producer

LSE = ESTj
Guardian
Supervisor

Originator

SEE = ESFp
Performer
Performer
Vibrant
LifeAffirmer
Politician /
Ambassador
Motivator
Presenter

Lyricist /
Romantic
Harmonizer
Clarifier

Psychologist /
Reporter
Discoverer
Advocate
PeaceMaker,
Harmonizer

Inspector /
Pragmatist
Planner
Inspector
Curator,
Reporter

Ne
Fi
Te
Si

Si
Te
Fi
Ne

Joiner

Persuader

Masterer?

Conquerer

Teacher

Envisioner
Mentor

Craftsman /
Mechanic
Analyzer
Operator

Humanist /
Empath
Foreseer
Developer

Counselor

Artisan

Legionnaire /
Conqueror
Promoter
Executor
Politician,
Entrepreneur

Ti
Se
Ni
Fe

Se
Ti
Fe
Ni

Ni
Fe
Ti
Se

Se
Fi
Te
Ni

Ni
Te
Fi
Se

Te
Ni
Se
Fi

Fi
Se
Ni
Te

Te
Si
Ne
Fi

Fi
Ne
Si
Te

Bn <
Benefit<
Advisor
1:3
4:2
2:~1
3:~4
asymmetric
1:~2
4:~3
2:4
3:1

Cnf
Conflicting
Novelty
1:~3
4:~2
2:~4
3:~1

Qid
Quasi-ident
Complement
1:~2
4:~3
2:~1
3:~4

Cnt
Contrary
Contrast
1:~1
4:~4
2:~2
3:~3

Ego
Super-Ego
Enigma
1:~4
4:~1
2:~3
3:~2

Ill
Illusionary
Cohort
1:~1
4:~4
2:3
3:2

Lkl
Look-alike
Companion
1:~4
4:~1
2:2
3:3

2.0%

6.5%

3.0%

3.5%

7.0%

10.0%

4.5%

Mentor / Actor

Si
Fe
Ti
Ne

Fe
Si
Ne
Ti

Ti
Ne
Si
Fe

Fe
Ni
Se
Ti

Socionics
Sociotype
TypeLogic

Mrr
Mirror
Pal
1:2
4:3
2:1
3:4

Act
Activity
Supplement
1:3
4:2
2:4
3:1

Dlt
Duality
Anima
1:4
4:1
2:3
3:2

Idn
Identical
Identity
1:1
4:4
2:2
3:3

Sdl
Semi-dual
Pedagogue
1:4
4:1
2:~2
3:~3

3.5%

11.5%

11.0%

4.0%

3.5%

29% Green
39% White
33% Red
% general popn

(p > j)
(p > j)

INTP
ESFJ
ISFJ
ENTP
INFJ
ESTP

Ne
Ti
Fe
Si

RL:/.../MBTI interrelationships5a.ods saved 12/24/2015 21:23:23

INTP's B-type

(if j)

Dominant = 1
Auxilliary = 2
Tertiary = 3
Inferior = 4

another

Stack B vs. A
Auxiliary
Tertiary
A
T
T
A
I
D
D
I
I
D
D
I

P/J

ENTP

Seeker /
Guardian /
Inventor
Conservator
Explorer
Protector
Berens (CognitiveProcesses)
Inventor
Supporter
Scientist,
Advocate, Poet
another
ThoughtLeader

For:

EII = INFj
LSE = ESTj

Altered Variables
N/S
T/F

Sdl
Cmp
Sp ^
Bn ^
Cnf
Qid
Cnt
Ego
Ill
Lkl
Sp <
Bn <
Mrr
Act
Dlt
Idn

Column belongs to Person A.

Contents belong to Person B.

Column belongs to Person B.

Contents belong to Person A.

E/I

Cmp
Sdl
Bn ^
Sp ^
Qid
Cnf
Ego
Cnt
Lkl
Ill
Bn <
Sp <
Act
Mrr
Idn
Dlt

ILE = ENTp
Visionary
Inventor

Socionics

Note my change of symbols:

1:2 = Dominant : Auxilliary

LII = INTj
ESE = ESFj
SEI = ISFp
ILE = ENTp
IEI = INFp
SLE = ESTp

ENFP
ISTJ
IEE = ENFp SLI = ISTp

Cmp
Sp <
Comparative Supervision<
Neighbor
Counterpart
1:1
1:2
4:4
4:3
2:~3
2:~4
3:~2
3:~1
asymmetric
1:~3
4:~2
2:1
3:4
5.0%

4.5%
Page 1

Ethicist

Wizard

Analyst /
Scientist
Conceptualizer
Director
Designer,
SensationSeeker
Investigator

Subjugator
Enterpriser /
Pioneer
Strategist
Mobilizer
Manager,
Mechanic

Administrator /
Director
Implementor
Supervisor
Soldier /
Expressionist
OrgnMan

Dreamer

Sp ^
Bn ^
Supervision^
Benefit^
Tribesman
Suitemate
1:~3
1:~2
4:~2
4:~3
2:1
2:4
3:4
3:1
asymmetric asymmetric
1:2
1:3
4:3
4:2
2:~4
2:~1
3:~1
3:~4
7.0%

12.5%

NF relationships
ENTP

ISFJ

ESFJ

INTP

ENFJ

ISTP

ESTP

INFJ

ESFP

INTJ

ENTJ

ISFP

ESTJ

INFP

ENFP

ISTJ

PersonalityPage
Keirsey

ENTp
Visionary
Inventor

ISFp
Nurturer
Protector

ESFj
Caregiver
Provider

INTj
Thinker
Architect

ENFj
Giver
Teacher

ISTj
Mechanic
Crafter

ESTp
Doer
Promoter

INFp
Protector
Counselor

INTp
Scientist
Mastermind

ENTj
Executive
Field Marshal

INFj
Idealist
Healer

ENFp
Inspirer
Champion

ISTp
Duty Fulfiller
Inspector

Originator

Guardian

Cooperator

Abstractionist

Complier?

Dreamer

Searcher

Solidifier?

Bonvivant /
Enthusiast
Facilitator
Caretaker

Critic /
Mastermind
Designer
Theorizer
Rationalist,
Philosopher

ISFj
Artist
Composer
Expressive
artist
Mediator /
Peacemaker
Composer
Producer

ESTj
Guardian
Supervisor

Pierce (CelebrityTypes)

ESFp
Performer
Performer
Vibrant
LifeAffirmer
Politician /
Ambassador
Motivator
Presenter

Lyricist /
Romantic
Harmonizer
Clarifier

Psychologist /
Reporter
Discoverer
Advocate
PeaceMaker,
Harmonizer

Inspector /
Pragmatist
Planner
Inspector
Curator,
Reporter

Seeker /
Guardian /
Inventor
Conservator
Explorer
Protector
Berens (CognitiveProcesses)
Inventor
Supporter
Scientist,
Advocate,
Poet
another
ThoughtLeader

Socionics

Dominant = 1
Auxilliary = 2
Tertiary = 3
Inferior = 4

Ne
Ti
Fe
Si

Socionics
Sociotype
TypeLogic
another

ENFP
= IEE = ENFp

ENFJ

Ethicist

Dreamer

Ni
Fe
Ti
Se

Se
Fi
Te
Ni

Ni
Te
Fi
Se

Te
Ni
Se
Fi

Fi
Se
Ni
Te

Te
Si
Ne
Fi

Fi
Ne
Si
Te

Ne
Fi
Te
Si

Si
Te
Fi
Ne

Bn ^
Benefit^
Suitemate
1:~2
4:~3
2:4
3:1
asymmetric
1:3
4:2
2:~1
3:~4

Ill
Illusionary
Cohort
1:~1
4:~4
2:3
3:2

Lkl
Look-alike
Companion
1:~4
4:~1
2:2
3:3

Cnt
Contrary
Contrast
1:~1
4:~4
2:~2
3:~3

Ego
Super-Ego
Enigma
1:~4
4:~1
2:~3
3:~2

Cnf
Conflicting
Novelty
1:~3
4:~2
2:~4
3:~1

Qid
Quasi-ident
Complement
1:~2
4:~3
2:~1
3:~4

Sp <
Supervision<
Counterpart
1:2
4:3
2:~4
3:~1
asymmetric
1:~3
4:~2
2:1
3:4

Bn <
Benefit<
Advisor
1:3
4:2
2:~1
3:~4
asymmetric
1:~2
4:~3
2:4
3:1

Sdl
Semi-dual
Pedagogue
1:4
4:1
2:~2
3:~3

Cmp
Comparative
Neighbor
1:1
4:4
2:~3
3:~2

Dlt
Duality
Anima
1:4
4:1
2:3
3:2

Idn
Identical
Identity
1:1
4:4
2:2
3:3

Mrr
Mirror
Pal
1:2
4:3
2:1
3:4

Act
Activity
Supplement
1:3
4:2
2:4
3:1

3.5%

11.5%

11.0%

4.0%

3.5%

5.0%

4.5%

2.0%

6.5%

3.0%

3.5%

7.0%

10.0%

4.5%

7.0%

12.5%

Ill
Illusionary
Cohort
1:~1
4:~4
2:3
3:2

Lkl
Look-alike
Companion
1:~4
4:~1
2:2
3:3

Sp ^
Supervision^
Tribesman
1:~3
4:~2
2:1
3:4
asymmetric
1:2
4:3
2:~4
3:~1

Bn ^
Benefit^
Suitemate
1:~2
4:~3
2:4
3:1
asymmetric
1:3
4:2
2:~1
3:~4

Mrr
Mirror
Pal
1:2
4:3
2:1
3:4

Act
Activity
Supplement
1:3
4:2
2:4
3:1

Dlt
Duality
Anima
1:4
4:1
2:3
3:2

Idn
Identical
Identity
1:1
4:4
2:2
3:3

Sdl
Semi-dual
Pedagogue
1:4
4:1
2:~2
3:~3

Bn <
Benefit<
Advisor
1:3
4:2
2:~1
3:~4
asymmetric
1:~2
4:~3
2:4
3:1

Cnf
Conflicting
Novelty
1:~3
4:~2
2:~4
3:~1

Qid
Quasi-ident
Complement
1:~2
4:~3
2:~1
3:~4

Cnt
Contrary
Contrast
1:~1
4:~4
2:~2
3:~3

Ego
Super-Ego
Enigma
1:~4
4:~1
2:~3
3:~2

3.5%

11.5%

11.0%

4.0%

3.5%

5.0%

4.5%

2.0%

6.5%

3.0%

3.5%

7.0%

10.0%

4.5%

7.0%

12.5%

Sdl
Semi-dual
Pedagogue
1:4
4:1
2:~2
3:~3

Bn <
Benefit<
Advisor
1:3
4:2
2:~1
3:~4
asymmetric
1:~2
4:~3
2:4
3:1

Cnf
Conflicting
Novelty
1:~3
4:~2
2:~4
3:~1

Ego
Super-Ego
Enigma
1:~4
4:~1
2:~3
3:~2

Cnt
Contrary
Contrast
1:~1
4:~4
2:~2
3:~3

Lkl
Look-alike
Companion
1:~4
4:~1
2:2
3:3

Ill
Illusionary
Cohort
1:~1
4:~4
2:3
3:2

Bn ^
Benefit^
Suitemate
1:~2
4:~3
2:4
3:1
asymmetric
1:3
4:2
2:~1
3:~4

Mrr
Mirror
Pal
1:2
4:3
2:1
3:4

Idn
Identical
Identity
1:1
4:4
2:2
3:3

Dlt
Duality
Anima
1:4
4:1
2:3
3:2

11.5%

11.0%

3.5%

Socionics
Sociotype
TypeLogic

Bn <
Benefit<
Advisor
1:3
4:2
another
2:~1
3:~4
asymmetric
1:~2
4:~3
22% Green
2:4
43% White
3:1
36% Red
% general popn

Artisan

Administrator /
Director
Implementor
Supervisor
Soldier /
Expressionist
OrgnMan

Se
Ti
Fe
Ni

28% Green
32% White
40% Red

= EIE = ENFj

Counselor

Subjugator
Enterpriser /
Pioneer
Strategist
Mobilizer
Manager,
Mechanic

Ti
Se
Ni
Fe

Socionics
Cmp
Sociotype Comparative
TypeLogic Neighbor
1:1
4:4
another
2:~3
3:~2

% general popn

Envisioner
Mentor

Wizard

Analyst /
Scientist
Conceptualizer
Director
Designer,
SensationSeeker
Investigator

Fe
Ni
Se
Ti

21% Green
44% White
36% Red
% general popn

Teacher
Humanist /
Empath
Foreseer
Developer

Ti
Ne
Si
Fe

Sp ^
Socionics
Sociotype Supervision^
TypeLogic Tribesman
another
1:~3
4:~2
2:1
3:4
asymmetric
1:2
4:3
29% Green
2:~4
43% White
3:~1
28% Red

INFJ

Conquerer
Legionnaire /
Conqueror
Promoter
Executor
Politician,
Entrepreneur

Fe
Si
Ne
Ti

INFP

= IEI = INFp

Masterer?
Craftsman /
Mechanic
Analyzer
Operator

Si
Fe
Ti
Ne

= EII = INFj

% general popn

Joiner

Persuader
Mentor / Actor

3.5%

RL:/.../MBTI interrelationships5a.ods saved 12/24/2015 21:23:23

Sp <
Cmp
Supervision< Comparative
Counterpart
Neighbor
1:2
1:1
4:3
4:4
2:~4
2:~3
3:~1
3:~2
asymmetric
1:~3
4:~2
2:1
3:4
11.5%

11.0%

Sp <
Qid
Supervision< Quasi-ident
Counterpart Complement
1:2
1:~2
4:3
4:~3
2:~4
2:~1
3:~1
3:~4
asymmetric
1:~3
4:~2
2:1
3:4

Cmp
Sp <
Comparative Supervision<
Neighbor
Counterpart
1:1
1:2
4:4
4:3
2:~3
2:~4
3:~2
3:~1
asymmetric
1:~3
4:~2
2:1
3:4

Sp ^
Act
Supervision^
Activity
Tribesman Supplement
1:~3
1:3
4:~2
4:2
2:1
2:4
3:4
3:1
asymmetric
1:2
4:3
2:~4
3:~1

4.0%

3.5%

5.0%

4.5%

2.0%

6.5%

3.0%

3.5%

7.0%

10.0%

4.5%

7.0%

12.5%

Sdl
Semi-dual
Pedagogue
1:4
4:1
2:~2
3:~3

Idn
Identical
Identity
1:1
4:4
2:2
3:3

Dlt
Duality
Anima
1:4
4:1
2:3
3:2

Act
Activity
Supplement
1:3
4:2
2:4
3:1

Mrr
Mirror
Pal
1:2
4:3
2:1
3:4

Bn ^
Benefit^
Suitemate
1:~2
4:~3
2:4
3:1
asymmetric
1:3
4:2
2:~1
3:~4

Sp ^
Supervision^
Tribesman
1:~3
4:~2
2:1
3:4
asymmetric
1:2
4:3
2:~4
3:~1

Lkl
Look-alike
Companion
1:~4
4:~1
2:2
3:3

Ill
Illusionary
Cohort
1:~1
4:~4
2:3
3:2

Ego
Super-Ego
Enigma
1:~4
4:~1
2:~3
3:~2

Cnt
Contrary
Contrast
1:~1
4:~4
2:~2
3:~3

Qid
Quasi-ident
Complement
1:~2
4:~3
2:~1
3:~4

Cnf
Conflicting
Novelty
1:~3
4:~2
2:~4
3:~1

4.0%

3.5%

5.0%

4.5%

2.0%

6.5%

3.0%

3.5%

7.0%

10.0%

4.5%

7.0%

12.5%

Page 2

do not overwrite
these formulas

Types & Characterizations

Type
ENFJ
ENTJ
ESFJ
ESTJ
ENFP
ENTP
ESTP
ESFP
INFJ
INTJ
ISTJ
ISFJ
INFP
INTP
ISFP
ISTP

PersonalityPage
Giver
Executive
Caregiver
Guardian
Inspirer
Visionary
Doer
Performer
Protector
Scientist
Duty Fulfiller
Nurturer
Idealist
Thinker
Artist
Mechanic

Keirsey
Teacher
Field Marshal
Provider
Supervisor
Champion
Inventor
Promoter
Performer
Counselor
Mastermind
Inspector
Protector
Healer
Architect
Composer
Crafter

Pierce (CelebrityTypes)
Persuader
Subjugator
Cooperator
Complier?
Searcher
Originator
Conquerer
Vibrant LifeAffirmer
Teacher
Wizard
Solidifier?
Guardian
Dreamer
Abstractionist
Expressive artist
Masterer?

Socionics
Mentor / Actor
Enterpriser / Pioneer
Bonvivant / Enthusiast
Administrator / Director
Psychologist / Reporter
Seeker / Inventor
Legionnaire / Conqueror
Politician / Ambassador
Humanist / Empath
Analyst / Scientist
Inspector / Pragmatist
Guardian / Conservator
Lyricist / Romantic
Critic / Mastermind
Mediator / Peacemaker
Craftsman / Mechanic

Berens (CognitiveProcesses)
Envisioner Mentor
Strategist Mobilizer
Facilitator Caretaker
Implementor Supervisor
Discoverer Advocate
Explorer Inventor
Promoter Executor
Motivator Presenter
Foreseer Developer
Conceptualizer Director
Planner Inspector
Protector Supporter
Harmonizer Clarifier
Designer Theorizer
Composer Producer
Analyzer Operator

See, also:
http://www.personalitypage.com/html/portraits.html
http://www.typelogic.com/intp.html
http://keirsey.com/
http://similarminds.com/personality_types.html
http://oddlydevelopedtypes.com/INTP
http://personalityjunkie.com/the-intp/
http://www.preludecharacteranalysis.com/types
http://www.16personalities.com/personality-types
http://www.cognitiveprocesses.com/16Types/16Types.cfm
http://lenore-exegesis.com/
http://www.personalitypathways.com/faces.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pSNTdSSLauQ
http://www.enneagraminstitute.com/intro.asp
http://tap3x.net/EMBTI/charts.html
http://www.enneagram.net/instsub.html
https://www.enneagramworldwide.com/instinctual-subtypes/
http://www.wikisocion.org/en/index.php?title=Model_A
http://www.davidmarkley.com/personality
http://testyourself.psychtests.com/testid/2143
http://personality-testing.info/tests/BIG5.php
http://www.mcs.vuw.ac.nz/research/publications/reports/mscs/mscs07-04.pdf
http://www.celebritytypes.com/blog/2011/01/jungian-functions-at-a-glance
http://www.socionics.com/rel/relcht.htm
http://pstypes.blogspot.com/2009/03/myers-briggs-compatibility-part-1.html
http://personalityinstitute.tripod.com/mbtiresearchreport.htm
http://www.ukessays.com/essays/psychology/evaluating-the-myers-briggs-type-indicator-psychology-essay.php
http://people.wku.edu/richard.miller/MBTI%20reliability%20validity.pdf
https://gustavus.edu/psychology/files/Larson.pdf?origin=publication_detail
http://www.academia.edu/11245391/A_CORRELATIONAL_STUDY_OF_EXPLICIT_AND_IMPLICIT_PERSONALITY_TESTS
http://harvey.psyc.vt.edu/Documents/BessHarveySwartzSIOP2003.pdf
http://www.typeinsights.com/FreeArticles/Relationships.pdf
http://www.interactionstyles.com/
http://www.personalityhacker.com/podcast-episode-0019-models-of-personality-development/
RL:/.../MBTI interrelationships5a.ods saved 12/24/2015 21:23:23

Page 1

another label
Enneagram?
Socionics
Counselor
2,1
Ethical Intuitive Extravert (EIE)
Manager, Mechanic
8
Logical Intuitive Extravert (LIE)
Joiner
2,3
Ethical Sensory Extravert (ESE)
8
Soldier / OrgnMan
Logical Sensory Extravert (LSE)
PeaceMaker, Harmonizer
7
Intuitive Ethical Extravert (IEE)
3
Scientist, ThoughtLeader
Intuitive Logical Extravert (ILE)
Politician, Entrepreneur
3,7
Sensory Logical Extravert (SLE)
7
SensationSeeker
Sensory Ethical Extravert (SEE)
Ethicist
4
Intuitive Ethical Introvert (IEI)
Designer, Investigator
5
Intuitive Logical Introvert (ILI)
Curator, Reporter
1
Sensory Logical Introvert (SLI)
Advocate, Poet
6,1,9
Sensory Ethical Introvert (SEI)
Dreamer
4
Ethical Intuitive Introvert (EII)
Rationalist, Philosopher
5
Logical Intuitive Introvert (LII)
Expressionist
2,9,4
Ethical Sensory Introvert (ESI)
Artisan
5
Logical Sensory Introvert (LSI)

Popn %
3.5%
3.5%
11.0%
10.0%
7.0%
3.5%
4.5%
6.5%
2.0%
3.0%
12.5%
11.5%
4.5%
4.0%
7.0%
5.0%

Types & Characterizations

Type
ENFJ
ENTJ
ESFJ
ESTJ
ENFP
ENTP
ESTP
ESFP
INFJ
INTJ
ISTJ
ISFJ
INFP
INTP
ISFP
ISTP

J: structured
J: structured
J: structured
J: structured
P: fluid
P: fluid
P: fluid
P: fluid
J: structured
J: structured
J: structured
J: structured
P: fluid
P: fluid
P: fluid
P: fluid

Dichotomy Characteristics
E: responsive
F: passionate
E: responsive
T: dispassionate
E: responsive
F: passionate
E: responsive
T: dispassionate
E: responsive
F: passionate
E: responsive
T: dispassionate
E: responsive
T: dispassionate
E: responsive
F: passionate
I: individualistic
F: passionate
I: individualistic
T: dispassionate
I: individualistic
T: dispassionate
I: individualistic
F: passionate
I: individualistic
F: passionate
I: individualistic
T: dispassionate
I: individualistic
F: passionate
I: individualistic
T: dispassionate

N: abstract
N: abstract
S: concrete
S: concrete
N: abstract
N: abstract
S: concrete
S: concrete
N: abstract
N: abstract
S: concrete
S: concrete
N: abstract
N: abstract
S: concrete
S: concrete

another label
Counselor
Manager, Mechanic
Joiner
Soldier / OrgnMan
PeaceMaker, Harmonizer
Scientist, ThoughtLeader
Politician, Entrepreneur
SensationSeeker
Ethicist
Designer, Investigator
Curator, Reporter
Advocate, Poet
Dreamer
Rationalist, Philosopher
Expressionist
Artisan

Berens group
Catalysts
Theorists
Stabilizers
Stabilizers
Catalysts
Theorists
Improvisers
Improvisers
Catalysts
Theorists
Stabilizers
Stabilizers
Catalysts
Theorists
Improvisers
Improvisers

Markley group
Idealists
Conceptualizers
Traditionalists
Traditionalists
Idealists
Conceptualizers
Experiencers
Experiencers
Idealists
Conceptualizers
Traditionalists
Traditionalists
Idealists
Conceptualizers
Experiencers
Experiencers

Keirsey Values?
Personal code of ethics
Emend rules and conventions
Duties and responsibilities
Duties and responsibilities
Personal code of ethics
Emend rules and conventions
Whatever works
Whatever works
Personal code of ethics
Emend rules and conventions
Duties and responsibilities
Duties and responsibilities
Personal code of ethics
Emend rules and conventions
Whatever works
Whatever works

Keirsey Temperaments
Abstract Cooperators
Abstract Utilitarians
Concrete Cooperators
Concrete Cooperators
Abstract Cooperators
Abstract Utilitarians
Concrete Utilitarians
Concrete Utilitarians
Abstract Cooperators
Abstract Utilitarians
Concrete Cooperators
Concrete Cooperators
Abstract Cooperators
Abstract Utilitarians
Concrete Utilitarians
Concrete Utilitarians

On this page and the next, certain general characteristics of groups below are mapped into individual types above.

Some Characacteristics of Dichotomies (i.e., each letter has a single meaning independent of other letters with which it appears; effects are simply additive)
E
I
S
N
F
T
P
J

E: responsive
I: individualistic
S: concrete
Information: Sensing vs. Intuition
N: abstract
F: passionate
Decisions: Feeling vs. Thinking
T: dispassionate
P: fluid
Structure: Perceiving vs. Judging
J: structured
Focus: Extroverted vs. Introverted

social
asocial???

experiential
mental

unstructured
rigid???

spontaneous
deliberate

solitary

direct
mediated

Popn %
cooperative
uncooperative???

50%
50%
68%
31%
53%
46%
42%
57%

These letters, indicating results from the official test, are the only fixed points. Everything else is interpretation, which is often ambiguous, conflated, specious and, of course, inconsistent.

Some Groupings using Dichotomies (visualized as rotations of oblique axes in 4-space or higher-order-space up to 8-space using Type Dynamics)
_S_J =
_S_P =
_NT_ =
_NF_ =

K-M
SJ
SP
NT
NF

Keirsey Temperaments
Guardians
Concrete Cooperators
Artisans
Concrete Utilitarians
Rationals
Abstract Utilitarians
Idealists
Abstract Cooperators

Keirsey Values?
Duties and responsibilities
Whatever works
Emend rules and conventions
Personal code of ethics

IS__ =
IN__ =
ES__ =
EN__ =

RL:/.../MBTI interrelationships5a.ods saved 12/24/2015 21:23:23

Berens
Stabilizers
Improvisers
Theorists
Catalysts

Markley
Traditionalists
Experiencers
Conceptualizers
Idealists

Analyticals
Drivers
Amiables
Expressives

Page 2

Keirsey?
security seeking
sensation seeking
knowledge seeking
identity seeking

Popn %
45%
23%
14%
17%

36%
14%
32%
18%

Types & Characterizations

Type
Dominant P/J
ENFJ Conventional judgment
ENTJ Conventional judgment
ESFJ Conventional judgment
ESTJ Conventional judgment
ENFP Receptive observation
ENTP Receptive observation
ESTP Receptive observation
ESFP Receptive observation
INFJ Purposeful observation
INTJ Purposeful observation
ISTJ Purposeful observation
ISFJ Purposeful observation
INFP Personal judgment
INTP Personal judgment
ISFP Personal judgment
ISTP Personal judgment

K-M
NF
NT
SJ
SJ
NF
NT
SP
SP
NF
NT
SJ
SJ
NF
NT
SP
SP

Fe:
Te:
Fe:
Te:
Ne:
Ne:
Se:
Se:
Ni:
Ni:
Si:
Si:
Fi:
Ti:
Fi:
Ti:

Dominant
Empathetic, conformist
Pragmatic, decisive
Empathetic, conformist
Pragmatic, decisive
Observant, inclusive, syncretic
Observant, inclusive, syncretic
Spontaneous, dissociative
Spontaneous, dissociative
Convergent, reductive, precise
Convergent, reductive, precise
Impressionistic, associative
Impressionistic, associative
Expressive, noncomformist
Validity-seeking, conditional
Expressive, noncomformist
Validity-seeking, conditional

Ni:
Ni:
Si:
Si:
Fi:
Ti:
Ti:
Fi:
Fe:
Te:
Te:
Fe:
Ne:
Ne:
Se:
Se:

Auxiliary
Convergent, reductive, precise
Convergent, reductive, precise
Impressionistic, associative
Impressionistic, associative
Expressive, noncomformist
Validity-seeking, conditional
Validity-seeking, conditional
Expressive, noncomformist
Empathetic, conformist
Pragmatic, decisive
Pragmatic, decisive
Empathetic, conformist
Observant, inclusive, syncretic
Observant, inclusive, syncretic
Spontaneous, dissociative
Spontaneous, dissociative

Se:
Se:
Ne:
Ne:
Te:
Fe:
Fe:
Te:
Ti:
Fi:
Fi:
Ti:
Si:
Si:
Ni:
Ni:

Many theorists agree that we all have all eight functions that we use in different situations. Absent any additionally imposed structure, 8
functions would have over 40,000 permutations. MBTI is one such structure. Berens expands MBTI. Socionics goes in another direction.

Jungian Function Stack with Type Dynamics (i.e., letters' meanings depend on other letters)

Popn%

5%
11%
24%
11%
9%
14%
12%
15%

Tertiary
Spontaneous, dissociative
Spontaneous, dissociative
Observant, inclusive, syncretic
Observant, inclusive, syncretic
Pragmatic, decisive
Empathetic, conformist
Empathetic, conformist
Pragmatic, decisive
Validity-seeking, conditional
Expressive, noncomformist
Expressive, noncomformist
Validity-seeking, conditional
Impressionistic, associative
Impressionistic, associative
Convergent, reductive, precise
Convergent, reductive, precise

Ti:
Fi:
Ti:
Fi:
Si:
Si:
Ni:
Ni:
Se:
Se:
Ne:
Ne:
Te:
Fe:
Te:
Fe:

Inferior
Validity-seeking, conditional
Expressive, noncomformist
Validity-seeking, conditional
Expressive, noncomformist
Impressionistic, associative
Impressionistic, associative
Convergent, reductive, precise
Convergent, reductive, precise
Spontaneous, dissociative
Spontaneous, dissociative
Observant, inclusive, syncretic
Observant, inclusive, syncretic
Pragmatic, decisive
Empathetic, conformist
Pragmatic, decisive
Empathetic, conformist

Dominant Auxiliary Tertiary

Fe
Te
Fe
Te
Ne
Ne
Se
Se
Ni
Ni
Si
Si
Fi
Ti
Fi
Ti

Ni
Ni
Si
Si
Fi
Ti
Ti
Fi
Fe
Te
Te
Fe
Ne
Ne
Se
Se

Se
Se
Ne
Ne
Te
Fe
Fe
Te
Ti
Fi
Fi
Ti
Si
Si
Ni
Ni

Inferior

Ti
Fi
Ti
Fi
Si
Si
Ni
Ni
Se
Se
Ne
Ne
Te
Fe
Te
Fe

Ni: Normative theory drives curiosity. Fill in the blanks. Evolving, tight-mesh set of abstractions assimilate new (even
paradoxical) observations. (Hidden) meanings are illuminated by theory. (Random effects model. Plato's Forms?)
Ne: Connections between new and old ideas drives curiosity. Connect the dots.

MBTI subset Dominant

Description (see also CelebrityTypes)
Expanding, loose-mesh, elastic, non-Cartesean scaffold of ideas. Empirics are
subject to multiple simultaneous interpretations. (Fixed effects model.)
IN_J = Ni
Convergent, reductive, precise
Pattern seeking, theory-building,
EN_P = Ne synthesizing, abstract, future-focused Observant, inclusive, syncretic
Si: Perceives meaning and potentiality of physicality. Memory drives curiosity. Unconventional.
IS_J = Si Concrete (incl. body), present-focused Impressionistic, associative
Se: Perceives immediate physicality. Novel experience drives curiosity. Conventional interests.
(Also present-past continuity in Si)
ES_P = Se
Spontaneous, dissociative
Ti: Deductive logic?? ( http://www.celebritytypes.com/blog/2013/04/why-te-is-inductive-andI_TP = Ti
Validity-seeking, conditional
Analytic, dispassionate decisions
ti-is-deductive/ ) Theory first? No. Others (and I) say Ti is inductive. Extrapolative.
Inferential. ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3FOXtkgOesY ). Detects minute
(Ti logic may be more subjective.)
E_TJ = Te
Pragmatic, decisive
distinctions, identifies inconsistencies. More likely to design/develop new rules and theories.
I_FP = Fi Instinctive, social and/or value-based Expressive, noncomformist
Te:
Inductive logic? Theory last? No. I say that Te (contrary to Myers' Ti), more likely to
decisions
E_FJ = Fe
Empathetic, conformist
follow expediency and pragmatism, is less likely to devise new rules, more likely to apply

Might say:
If only...
This is how the universe works
This is how the world works
Enjoy! It is what it is....
Try it this way. (This ought to work.)
Do it my way (the right way)
Feel my joy/pain
I feel your joy/pain

crude deduction, (or more likely abduction.) Descriptive. Interpolative. Categorical.

Remember that N, S are exclusively information-gathering (i.e., decision-feeding) functions, while T, F are exclusively decision-making functions.
Under this schema, each Dominant function forces another specific function to be Inferior, e.g. Fe always pairs withTi
Dominant::{Auxiliary, Tertiary} are always Perception::2*Judgment or Judgment::2*Perception
Dominant::Tertiary are always same attitude, i.e. {Introverted::Introverted or Extroverted::Extroverted}
Dominant::Auxiliary are always opposite attitude.
Therefore, Auxiliary and Tertiary should be thought of as working as a pair supporting Dominant.

For {I__P,E__J} dominant judgment criterion is supported by two info sources.

For {I__J,E__P} dominant information hunger is driven by two judgment criteria.

21%
29%
22%
28%

I__P =
I__J =
E__P =
E__J =

Dominant P/J (closer to socionics or Pierce at CelebrityTypes)

Ji Personal judgment
Inside pushing out, subjective
Pi Purposeful observation
Pe Receptive observation
Outside pulled in, objective
Je Conventional judgment

RL:/.../MBTI interrelationships5a.ods saved 12/24/2015 21:23:23

Dominant Auxiliary Tertiary

Contrary to prescribed usage? No. Spends vs. gains energy.

Imposes own structure

Hungry for comparisons
Hungry for experience, ideas
Accepts received structure

Page 3

Interpreting
Appraising
Opportunistic
Conformist

Ji
Pi
Pe
Je

Pe
Je
Ji
Pi

Pi
Ji
Je
Pe

Inferior

Je
Pe
Pi
Ji

on
xtroverted}

inant.

Types & Characterizations

E/I

N/S

T/F

J/P

pct

3.5%

11.0%

10.0%

7.0%

3.5%

4.5%

6.5%

2.0%

3.0%

12.5%

11.5%

4.5%

4.0%

7.0%

5.0%

3.5%

Berens Interaction Styles

In Charge
In Charge
Get Things Going
In Charge
Get Things Going
Get Things Going
In Charge
Get Things Going
Chart the Course
Chart the Course
Chart the Course
Behind the Scenes
Behind the Scenes
Behind the Scenes
Behind the Scenes
Chart the Course

Sum - pct
T/F
N/S

Total Result

17% 14% 31%

36% 32% 68%

Total Result
53% 46% 99%

Is TypeDynamics overspecified wrt alternating attitude in Dom, Aux, Ter, Inf?

It seems that there ought to be a way for at least Aux attitude to follow Dom & Ter, yielding distinct subtypes.

Sum - pct
J/P
E/I

Total Result

28% 22% 50%

29% 21% 50%

Another experimental grid:

F
ESFJ

ENFJ
ISFJ INFJ

Total Result
57% 42% 99%

ry
ion ia
rs xill
ve u
ro t a
int inan
m
do

ESFP
ISFP

ISTP
ESTP

ENFP
INFP

INTP
ENTP
ISTJ INTJ

Sum - pct
J/P
N/S

on t
rsi an
ve in
tro om
ex ry d
illa
ux

Total Result

12% 19% 31%

45% 23% 68%

ESTJ

ENTJ

Total Result
57% 42% 99%

Sum - pct
J/P
T/F

Total Result

28% 25% 53%

29% 17% 46%

Total Result
57% 42% 99%

Sum - pct
N/S
E/I

Total Result

18% 32% 50%

14% 36% 50%

RL:/.../MBTI interrelationships5a.ods saved 12/24/2015 21:23:23

Page 4

Enneagram
Center

Instinct

Feeling

Thinking

Type
8
9
1
2
3
4
5
6
7

Behaviors
self-confident, decisive, willful, confrontational
receptive, reassuring, complacent, resigned
principled, purposeful, self-controlled, perfectionist
generous, demonstrative, people-pleasing, possessive
adaptable, excelling, driven, image-conscious
expressive, dramatic, self-absorbed, temperamental
perceptive, innovative, secretive, isolated
engaging, responsible, anxious, suspicious
spontaneous, versatile, acquisitive, scattered

Riso-Hudson
Challenger
Peacemaker
Reformer
Helper
Achiever
Individualist
Investigator
Loyalist
Enthusiast

Palmer-Daniels
Protector
Mediator
Perfectionist
Giver
Performer
Romantic
Observer
Loyal Skeptic
Epicure

Instinctual Subtypes (motivations)

Secure
Survivalist
Collector
Pioneer
Nurturer
Company Man
Creative Individualist
Castle Defender
Family Loyalist
Gourmand

Social
Group Leader
Community Benefactor
Social Reformer
Ambassador
Politician
Critical Commentator
Profesor
Social Guardian
Utopian Visionary

modified by one or two Wings

Levels of Development
1
Liberation
2
Psychological Capacity
Healthy
3
Social Value
4
Imbalance / Social Role
5
Interpersonal Control
Average
6
Overcompensation
7
Violation
8
Obsession and Corruption
Unhealthy
9
Pathological Destructiveness

Direction of Integration (Growth)

1758241 9369
Direction of Disintegration (Stress)
1758241 9369

See:
https://www.enneagraminstitute.com/how-the-enneagram-system-works/
https://www.enneagramworldwide.com/instinctual-subtypes/
http://www.projectevolove.com/education/1/general-concepts

RL:/.../MBTI interrelationships5a.ods saved 12/24/2015 21:23:23

Page 1

Sexual
Commander
Seeker
Evangelist
Lover
Movie Star
Dramatic Person
Secret Agent
Warrior
Adventurer

Socionics
Socionics Function #, name

MBTI #,name

Socionics pattern

Berens #, name Berens pattern

1 = leading, program, primary, base

1 = Dominant

1 = Leading

2 = creative, secondary

2 = Auxiliary

2 = Support

3 = role

--m

4 = vulnerable, sensitive

7 = observant, ignoring, restricting

inverts 1

8 = demonstrative, background

inverts 2

Socionics dichotomies
accepting

Ti

(independent,
fixed)

Ti

Ne

(dependent,
variable)

producing

mental

strong

valued

mental

strong

valued

(conscious)

8 = Devilish

inverts 4

Se

Fi

accepting

mental

weak

unvalued

7 = Deceiving

inverts 3

Fi

Se

producing

mental

weak

unvalued

Fe

accepting

weak

valued

Si

producing

vital

weak

valued

4 = Aspirational

Si

3 = Tertiary

3 = Relief

Fe

vital

(unconscious)

5 = Opposing

inverts 1

Ni

Te

accepting

vital

strong

unvalued

6 = Critical

inverts 2

Te

Ni

producing

vital

strong

unvalued

inverts 4

Examples

LIII = INTj = INTP

Ne

4 = Inferior

ed-

6 = mobilizing, activating

lign

inverts 3

isa

5 = suggestive, dual-seeking

ILE = ENTp = ENTP

Critical: Note changed meaning of fourth letter.

For MBTI, it is the Extroverted function.
For Socionics, it is the Dominant (i.e., Leading) function.

Note: Socionics populates functions 3 through 8 in a completely different order from Jung, MBTI and Berens.
MBTI 3 and 4 become Socionics 6 and 5, respectively.

accepting vs. producing =

leading or following in its Block

1: Describes a person's most comfortable thinking patterns, perspective on life, state of mind, and behavioral style, their positive motivational forces.
2: The primary mode of application of the base function. Used to interact with others, solve problems.
3: When a person is actively using his base function, the role function is essentially turned off. It is activated when a person is anxious.
4: The vulnerable function is also called the Point or Place of Least Resistance (PoLR) or sensitive function. The element in this function creates a feeling of frustration and inadequacy and is avoided as much as possible.
5: The suggestive function is also called the dual-seeking function. It perfectly complements and drives the activity of the leading function. Entertaining, soothing, energizing.
6: The subject is more comfortable using this function than the suggestive function but still can only use it sporadically.
7: The ignoring function is also called the observing, or limiting function. A person has very little use of this element, as it is the rival image of the base function, representing an antithetical approach to the same domain.
It lies in the subconscious as a persistent annoyance to the individual.
8: A person uses this element mainly as a kind of game, or to ridicule those who he thinks take it too seriously. They often intentionally go against its conventional usage simply to prove a point in favor of their creative function.
However, this function is used quite often in private, to produce information of its element to support their creative function when focusing on making contact with the external world.

Socionics Model A
Function number pattern
Accepting Producing

Ring 1 = Mental
Ring 2 = Vital

Block 1 = Ego (valued)

Block 2 = Super-ego (unvalued)
Block 3 = Super-id (valued)
Block 4 = Id (unvalued)

1
4
6
7

2
3
5
8

Strong
Weak
Weak
Strong

Complementarity is a corollary of Duality.

Ego and Super-ID complement each other.
Ego conflicts with Super-Ego.
iD conflicts with Super-Id.

both valued or both subdued

Functions and Complements:

Functions and Conflicts: (?)

1: Leading
2: Creative
3: Role
4: Vulnerable

1: Leading
2: Creative
5: Suggestive
6: Mobilizing

5: Suggestive
6: Mobilizing
7: Ignoring
8: Demonstrative

4: Vulnerable
3: Role
8: Demonstrative
7: Ignoring

Based on the Socionics schema, Duality refers to {1:5; 2:6} = {1:~3; 2:~4}
This is equivalent to {1:4; 2:3} in the Jungian, MBTI, Berens schema.

Block 1 describes people's preferred and most comfortable and natural role or "mode of operation" when interacting with other people or the environment.
Block 2 is the source of much self-consciousness.
In Block 3, people appreciate direct help to the Super-id and see tasks related to it as chores best left to others, but also as a source of frequent recreation.
In Block 4, people see Id elements as a relatively easy, if somewhat boring and meaningless exercise, good for sharpening one's skills, but not worth focusing on too much.

RL:/.../MBTI interrelationships5a.ods saved 12/24/2015 21:23:23

Page 1

Complementary Info Metabolism Traits:

Ne
Ni
Fe
Fi

Si
Se
Ti
Te

Socionics
Information
Metabolism
Element
Extraverted logic
(thinking)
Extraverted ethics
(feeling)

Abstracted definition(?)
(rather, concerned with these
Information Aspects)
external dynamics of objects
(explicit meaning of purposely observed
structures)

internal dynamics of objects

(implicit meaning of purposely observed
structures)

external statics of objects

Extraverted sensing

(explicit meaning of naturally observed

structures)

Extraverted intuition

(implicit meaning of naturally observed

structures)

Introverted logic
(thinking)
Introverted ethics
(feeling)

internal statics of objects

external statics of fields

(explicit meaning of naturally observed
processes)

internal statics of fields

(implicit meaning of naturally observed
processes)

external dynamics of fields

Introverted sensing

(explicit meaning of purposefully observed

processes)

Introverted intuition

(implicit meaning of purposely observed

processes)

internal dynamics of fields

English
Acronym Symbol Mental Processes

Te
Fe

task oriented, efficient, accurate, pragmatic; less abstract

responsible for the perception of an emotional state in an individual and the bodily and linguistic expression of emotions. Fe is able to influence others' emotional
condition and to communicate its own, "infecting" others. Fe is used especially in generating and recognizing excitement and enthusiasm.

Se

responsible for the perception, control, defense, and acquisition of space, territory, and control. It observes outward appearances, estimates whether forces are in
alignment or conflict, and uses strength of will and power-based methods to achieve purposes. Se understands territory and physical aggression. It is also the function
of contact and apprehension of qualia.

Ne

sees possibilities; seeks the essence (permanent but not obvious traits) of people or things; estimates potential and latent capabilities; speculates on causes,
but sees each manifestation as distinct

Ti

analytic; interested in logical explanations and distinctions, categories and meaning, consistency and structure, independent of application; interprets information
according to how it fits into a (concrete or abstract) validating system

Fi

responsible for understanding the quality, nature, and proper maintenance of personal relations; makes moral judgments; and aspires to humanism and kindness.
Fi has a strong understanding of the social hierarchy and how people feel about each other, their attitudes of like or dislike, enthrallment or disgust, repulsion or
attraction, enmity or friendship.

Si

responsible for perception of physical sensations; questions of comfort, coziness, and pleasure; and a sense of harmony and acclimation with one's environment
(especially physical). Si understand how well a person or thing's behavior agrees with its nature as well as the differences between comfortable behaviors
and positions and uncomfortable ones.

Ni

seeks to understand and forecast evolution of processes over time; is acutely aware of events that occurring outside of immediate perception.

These are the Information Aspects (i.e, inputs) that align with each Information Metabolism Element of the psyche. They are not the same thing.
inFJ

Objects vs. Fields is an elaboration of E/I. Objects are discrete, categorical, structural. Fields are continuous and involve interaction (e.g., attitude,
orientation) between the observed and the observer or among objects (e,g,, mechanics).
Static perception = Pe(Ji) vs. Dynamic perception = Pi(Je). Dynamic perception {Si, Ni} involves memory, association, expectation (incl. potentialities beyond
past observation.) Static perception {Se, Ne} is opportunistic, descriptive, dissociative, self-limiting rather than inductive.
So, as processed by a leading function:
Dynamics of objects = E__J (= E__j) = purposefully observed (Pi) structures (E).
Statics of objects
= E__P (= E__p) =
naturally observed (Pe) structures (E).
Dynamics of fields = I__J (= I__p) = purposefully observed (Pi) processes (I).
Statics of fields
= I__P (= I__j) =
naturally observed (Pe) processes (I).
External = {T, S} vs. Internal = {F, N} describes explicit vs. implicit understanding. So, in a leading function:
External dynamics of objects gets us to E_TJ (L_E = Logical Extrovert), whose Information Metabolism most easily processes explicit meaning of purposely
observed structures.

See:
http://www.sociotype.com/socionics/information_elements/
http://www.sociotype.com/socionics/information_elements/Ti
http://www.sociotype.com/socionics/types/LII-INTj/
http://www.sociotype.com/socionics/model_a/
http://www.sociotype.com/socionics/information_elements/
http://personalitycafe.com/socionics-forum/116936-reinin-dichotomies-traits-test-determine-type.html
http://www.cognitiveprocesses.com/16Types/16Types.cfm

RL:/.../MBTI interrelationships5a.ods saved 12/24/2015 21:23:23

Page 2