Professional Documents
Culture Documents
discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/308112723
CITATIONS
READS
2 authors, including:
Andrea Kiss
TU Wien
41 PUBLICATIONS 315 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
With 4 figures
Dem Beitrag liegt die Posterprsentation zugrunde, die auf der 39. Tagung des Arbeitskreises fr historische Kulturlandschaftsforschung in Mitteleuropa, ARKUM e.V. (Szeged,
26.29. September 2012), gezeigt wurde.
248
the forest vegetation, trees and open sand surfaces in the Sand Ridge area? What
was the importance of woodland in the study area? Is the data capable of circumscribing the spatial distribution of forest coverage? Is it possible to identify dominant tree types in the area? What sandy soil types and sand dune forms can be
identified on the basis of medieval documents? Is it possible to detect any sand
movement in (or with the help of) the documentary evidence? Does the appearance of arboreal vegetation provide information on tide sands, and do sand and
forest appear in close proximity or do they have separate distributions within the
Sand Ridge area? These questions are approached here mainly through the presentation and analysis of medieval documentary sources and the results are compared with the information available from the data provided by the natural
sciences and archaeology.
Fig. 1:
249
nynszki 2006, p. 2). Some sand dune ridges preserved the elevation of their
former surface (Cholnoky 1902; Kdr 1935, pp. 8-12). The wind-blown sand may
accumulate in extensive sand dune formations (so-called garmada), but often the
wind spreads the sand over the surface (Marosi 1967, p. 244). Although the extent
of the sand cover is usually small; some more extensive examples can be found in
the Sand Ridge area (Borsy 1977, p. 47).
The vegetation cover adapted to the morphological complexity: rather different species spectra can be found on the mounds or hilltops than in the hollows
between the sand dunes. Arboreal vegetation is of key importance for understanding changes in land cover and land use in the Sand Ridge area: with the
higher density of arboreal vegetation there is a higher probability that sand dunes
are anchored (with less movement possible). Therefore, the association with forests or woodland may reduce the possibility of extensive open landscapes with
moving sand dunes close by.
However, the individual trees or bushes/shrubs mentioned in medieval texts
which contain clear indications of location (e. g. in perambulations) provide us
with important information on what species and types of trees might have been
present in the medieval landscape. In this respect, medieval charters referring to
(mass) arboreal vegetation provide important material on broader landscape patterns.
250
In terms of its main natural attributes, the Sand Ridge area is representative of
a forest steppe zone (grassland with some arboreal vegetation). Juniper and poplar-juniper mixed forests are characteristic for this type of vegetation (Simon
1967, p. 235f.; Vidki 2003, p. 27). The hilltops and slopes of the oak-poplar-juniper forest can harbour other trees, the dominant species being oak sub-species
which prefer drier conditions (e. g. Quercus petraea L.). The woodland undergrowth contains mainly steppe formations, and where more humid soil conditions
exist a ground cover consisting of steppe vegetation may also develop. As we shall
see, sub-species of arboreal vegetation can rarely be detected in medieval documentation (except, perhaps, for juniper; but typically not for oak). The gallery forests of the forest steppe is the third type of arboreal vegetation encountered; there
the predominant species is Quercus robusta L., but Quercus pubescens W., usually
mixed with white poplar and wild pear, also appears (Vidki 2003, p. 28). Steppe
(grass-dominated) vegetation can usually be found (in open or closed association)
in the hollows between the sand dunes, but in hollows with a high water table wet
and marshy meadows may also be encountered (Simon 1967, p. 235f.; Vidki 2003,
p. 26f.).
251
Dorozsma-Majsa Sand Ridge area, a covering sand layer was dated to the period
between the 4th and 10th century AD (Blint 2007).
For the High Middle Ages, the 11th13th century, and the period following the
settlement of the Cumans in the Sand Ridge area (earlymid 13th century; see:
Lki and Schweitzer 2001; Smegi 2001; Gbris 2003; jhzi et al. 2003; Nyri et
al. 2006a; 2006b; 2007; 2009; Kiss et al. 2006, 2008; Benyhe 2013) were periods
when moving sand has been identified on excavation sites. The 15th century marks
a further, late medieval period in which sand movement intensified (Kiss et al.
2008; Nyri et al. 2007; see also fig. 1: intervals).
The natural conditions taking general climatological conditions, especially
the amount of precipitation into account suggest the presence of ground cover
vegetation and no intensive sand movement in the Sand Ridge area. For this reason, periods with intensive sand movement were associated by geographers to
previous or ongoing grazing and/or overgrazing in the area, with the decrease in
vegetation cover causing increased wind erosion and moving sand. In this case anthropogenic influence (e. g. the documented importance of cattle) plays a crucial
role in understanding the processes at work. For example, in the 15th16th century,
when cattle export was probably at its strongest, the exploitation of sandy areas
for grazing cattle reached its greatest extent (Kldy-Nagy 1968; 1970; 2002; Kocsis
1993; Mlyusz 1983; Mszros 1979). The desertion and concentration of settlements are also strongly connected to this situation, and are linked to the increased
use of these sandy steppe areas as extensive pastures (Maksay 1971; Rosta 2009;
Szab 1966; 1976). Grazing, especially overgrazing, leads to a loss of vegetation
cover and the growth of open sand surfaces with no or rare vegetation, and thus
to intensified sand movements.
In sum, archaeo-geomorphological investigations have revealed increased
sand movement in the Middle Ages, in the 11th13th century, but especially
around the mid-13th century and the 15th century.
252
The details the charters contain about aspects of the landscape can be explained by the raison dtre of these documents: in most cases charters were issued
when legal procedures, especially land purchase, inheritance or land division took
place. These procedures required perambulation in many cases: the identification,
detailed description and (if necessary) re-demarcation of land boundaries. When
a perambulation was carried out, the relevant parties (together with the official
representatives of the place of authentication and the neighbours) had to go to the
actual land and walk along its boundaries. During this process a detailed description of the boundaries and landmarks was made which then became an integral
part of the legal document (charter) concerning the property. These charters were
kept as the most important proof of the property rights of an actual landowner
(Koszta 1998; Kfalvi 2006, see also Kiss 2001; 2009).
It is not possible to identify the extent of the forest cover in the medieval Sand
Ridge area on the basis of the available charters, but some forests or woodlands,
as well as individual trees or bushes, have however been documented and can be
located from the medieval documentation. A comparison of the reconstructed
18th century conditions with those of the Middle Ages, allows for some limited
further conclusions. The written documentation also makes it possible to obtain
information on some of the typical forest tree species and their locations. Finally,
in certain cases written sources can provide early evidence for the appearance and
existence in the Middle Ages of some tree species (e. g. juniper) previously
thought to have appeared only later in the Sand Ridge area.
The location of the data derived from charters and the archaeological evidence
reveals that the medieval Sand Ridge area can be divided in a manner similar to
what can be traced in the 18th century (see Br and Molnr 2009, p. 174) into
two parts along the Kecskemt-Tiszaalpr line (fig. 1). While in the smaller,
northern area more documentary evidence is present and usable (probably due to
its higher population density and location), in the larger, southern area far fewer
contemporary documentary sources (but more archaeological evidence on moving sand) are available.
253
254
Fig. 2:
255
Sand Ridge area, the charters documenting the conditions of ownership of the
Benedictine order are of special importance. The significance of two perambulations documented in 1055 and 1211 must be emphasised here: the description of
the landed properties and boundaries of Izsk (high medieval Kolon=Culun) in
1055 and 1211 mentions three characteristic sands related to soil types (Gyrffy
1992, pp. 149152; Erdlyi 1908, pp. 487495, 502517): black sand, fvenyes
(most probably meaning fine sand) and stony sand. Out of these three types, historical and archaeological investigations have identified the black (fekete) sand as
the sandy soil type rich in topsoil, the fvenyes (fuegnes) as moving sand, and
the stony (kves=cues) sand as sand with meadow limestone or dolomite
(Gyrffy 1956, p. 411, 413; Blint 2007, p. 47; Szarka 2008, p. 15f.). Although this
is the only relatively clear and well-localised instance of soil differentiation, reference to the medieval distinction between sandy soil types in another charter
even though it concerns the Danube-Tisza Interfluve in a more general sense
also emphasises the importance of lands with sandy black soils (1473: in terris
negris, quam arenosis, inter fluvios Ticiae et Danuby, [...]; see Reizner 1991,
p. 72).
The other important target of our investigations was the detection, identification and analysis of sand dune forms mentioned in medieval documents. Although
we did not encounter any direct mention of sand dune forms, in some cases important, sand-related information could be tracked down when sand is used as an
adjective to describe a hill or mound (mons, monticulum). Concerning the probable medieval mention of sand forms, only one source can currently provide more
information: during the perambulation of Cegld in 1368, a charter refers to the
south-western boundaries of a hill called Hosszhomok hegy (mons Hoziuhomok; today Csem) (Brtfai-Szab 1938, pp. 8486). Later charters (dated to
1407, 1465/1470 and 1655) and 17th19th century maps lead us to conclude that, in
a manner similar to the condition prevailing in the 18th century, this part of the
settlement was dominated by sand dunes (Tber 2012b, p. 864), just as it is today.
Moreover, the archeo-geomorphological investigations at Kiskunhalas also identified sand dunes, and called attention to the fact that the main hollow between
the sand dunes was filled up by the 15th century through human activity and probably also through changes in the climate (Nyri and Rosta 2009, p. 32; Nyri and
Kiss 2009, p. 35).
256
Fig. 3:
257
258
orchards (Tiszaalpr, 1266: Csnky and Grdonyi 1936, p. 90; Fejr 18291844, IV/
3. pp. 315320; Hernd 1409: Brtfai-Szab 1938, p. 125; Mlyusz 1958, II/2,
p. 201f.).
The southern part of the Sand Ridge area
Among the documentary sources referring to the southern parts of the Sand
Ridge area, pine and pine forest are mentioned in a charter, dated to 1211, describing the possessions of the Abbey of Tihany in the area of Kolon (present-day
Izsk) (Fejr 18291844, VII/5., pp. 177202; Wenzel 1860, I., p. 114). According to
Gyrffy (1956, p. 411f.), the pine was most probably juniper (which can grow up
to 5 m). A further four 15th century charters refer either to forests or forested
stands in the area. This vegetation could also be typical of the vegetation along
the boundaries of Kecel, Bugac, Cslyosplos (Cholias) and Kiskunmajsa
(Majosaszlls). No medieval reference to arboreal vegetation is known south of
the Kecel-Cslyosplos line, a situation that is similar to 18th century conditions
(see Bir 2008, p. 26; Bir and Molnr 2009, p. 174 on the lack of 18th century
arboreal vegetation). Even though the medieval sources are silent on arboreal
vegetation, this cannot be taken as proof of the absence of medieval tree cover in
the area (see figs. 3 and 4); nevertheless the lack of even small stands of trees in
the 18th century may provide some interesting parallels. It is also important to
mention those cases where no information about tree vegetation could be found
in the medieval documentation even though the presumed medieval name of the
settlement is clearly related to the presence of some arboreal vegetation (e. g.
Kiskrs, Soltvadkert; (Tber 2012a, p. 368).
While trees and forests appear in the majority of the medieval sources examined for information about arboreal vegetation, some important indications are
also available for shrubs. Among these the most important species is probably juniper, which can reach the size of tree. If we accept Gyrffy's opinion that the pine
mentioned in the 1211 charter was a juniper (Gyrffy 1956, p. 411f.), then the appearance of this species can be traced in two types of evidence. The first is the pine
forest mentioned in a charter of 1211 in the neighbourhood of Kolon (present-day
Izsk). The second is archaeologically documented: based on the wood remains
(here clearly juniper) of a well found in a High Medieval Arpadian-period settlement near Kiskunflegyhza, the excavators suggest that junipers were also common in this area (Morgs et al. 1997, p. 99; Blint 2007, p. 72). These medieval
juniper findings are important, since, according to the scientific literature available on the subject (e. g. Bir and Molnr 2009, p. 22), juniper cannot be traced
further back than 250 years, and up to now it was even questioned whether juniper was present at all in the area before the 18th century. On current evidence,
there are now at least three instances documenting the medieval appearance of
junipers in the area (Blint 2007, p. 71f.; Tber 2012a, p. 368).
A forest is mentioned without further details in a 15th century charter (1451:
Gyrfs III., p. 626) in the area of Bugac. Descriptions of the 18th century (e. g.),
however, suggest that junipers appear in great numbers in the Bugac area only
Fig. 4:
259
Forest/woodland coverage (in percentage) of the Great Hungarian Plain in the early
1780s (confined to the present-day areas of Hungary), based on the First Military
Survey completed in 1783
Br and Molnr 2009, p. 173
(Bir and Molnr 2009, p. 188). Apart from juniper, there is a late 15th century
reference to a blackberry bush from the southern area (Cslyosplos, 1493: Gyrfs 1883, p. 709); additionally, an etymological interpretation of the name of the
village of Csengele proposes that one of the typical species in the area was blackthorn (Blint 2007, p. 75; Tber 2012a, p. 369; see also fig. 3).
Archaeological evidence shows that oak was used to build three Arpadianperiod (high medieval) wells at a settlement near Kiskunflegyhza. This suggests
that a larger number of oak trees, perhaps an oak forest, existed in the area of
Kiskunflegyhza (Morgs et al. 1997, p. 99; Blint 2007, p. 74). In the reconstruction of the vegetation of the same area in the 18th century (Br 2006, p. 74), based
on the maps and descriptions of the First Military Survey, shrubs and/or scrubland
are mentioned without any indication of the species involved. It is also important
to highlight the results of pollen analysis: for the mid-13th century, arboreal vegetation in the form of willow, alder and oak were mainly identified in the area of
Nagyszk in the Danube-Tisza interfluve (Smegi 2001, p. 316).
For the southern areas, vegetation is scarcely mentioned in medieval sources.
It is interesting that arboreal vegetation or landscape (elements) are also hardly
260
mentioned in the 18th century descriptions of this part of the study area. Nevertheless, some important 18th century information may help with finding some parallels for the medieval evidence. For example, as described above, medieval forests are documented in the Kecel area, and it is in the same area that oak forests,
also comprising gorse and alder, are mentioned in the (late) 18th century (Bir
and Molnr 2009, p. 199). According to the vegetation reconstruction of the late
18th century, oak also played a dominant role among the arboreal species in the
area of Kiskrs, Soltvadkert and Kiskunmajsa (Bir 2006, p. 73). Even if no direct or indirect evidence is available to link the late 18th century to the medieval
conditions, there is a possibility that given the 18th century dominance of oak in
the areas mentioned the same tree type was also one of the important species in
these areas in the Middle Ages.
According to 18th century travel accounts, the sand dunes around Izsk were
covered in arboreal vegetation whose dominant species was the white poplar
(Populus alba L.). The dominance of white poplar in the 18th century may suggest
that this tree species might have also played an important role in the Middle Ages,
apparently in some contradiction to Gyrffy who stressed the medieval importance of juniper (see above). Nevertheless, botanists also emphasise that in the
18th century junipers indeed appear scattered all around in the forests of the
area (Bir and Molnr 2009, p. 187f.) which might suggest that juniper once
played a significant (if not dominant) role amongst the arboreal vegetation of the
area.
Discussion
In the present study we have considered two important landscape elements: while
sand is the basic feature, dominating morphology and playing a significant role in
the formation of the natural vegetation cover, arboreal vegetation is the most
characteristic vegetation type indicating a relatively stable morphology. In order
to achieve this goal, the information concerning the arboreal vegetation contained
in medieval sources was collected, as was that relating to sand. Despite the relative scarcity of the medieval documentation, it has been possible in a number of
cases to provide information on the medieval landscape conditions of the Sand
Ridge area, with special emphasis on the information related to sand and arboreal
vegetation. When available, further specific data, such as data on sandy soil types,
potential information on sand dune formations and references to tree (and bush/
shrub) species, have also been included. Through the example of these two significant landscape features, and by comparing and combining the evidence from medieval documents with the results obtained in other fields (e. g. archaeology, geomorphology, palaeoenvironmental research), it has been possible to further
extend our current understanding of the medieval landscape conditions of the
Sand Ridge area.
Most of the medieval moving sand formations (especially those documented
by archaeology) are known from the southern Sand Ridge area. However, rather
261
more written information on possible open sand surfaces has survived in the
northern area. Compared to the southern area blighted by scarce documentation more forested areas and arboreal vegetation are reported in the north (see
figs. 2 and 3).
There is practically no overlap between the sandy areas documented in the medieval sources and the medieval moving sand surfaces known from archaeo-geomorphological investigations. This is due to the fact that excavations (primarily
connected to the line of future motorways) were largely not carried out on sites
where relevant documentary evidence is available from the Middle Ages. One of
the positive outcomes is that documentary sources provide additional information
on further localities where (open or sparsely vegetated) sand surfaces were dominant for shorter or longer periods in the Middle Ages. Unlike the situation for
sand, the evidence for arboreal vegetation is predominantly available in written
documents (mainly perambulation charters): only in two cases did the results of
archaeological (archaeobotanical) research suggest the presence of oak or pine
(juniper) in the neighbourhood.
Comparing the two main maps (figs. 2 and 3) that illustrate what is known
about the sand-related aspects of the landscape and the arboreal vegetation, a
first glance reveals the larger amount of data on (open) sand-related elements
compared to the arboreal vegetation which is more connected to the smaller,
northern area. But, as indicated, information on moving sand comes from archaeological investigations, while very little documentary data are available for this
southern area in general. In fact, documentary sources concerning sand surfaces
and arboreal vegetation together are reported in the neighbourhood of the same
settlements (usually in the same perambulation charters). This is probably connected to the fact that each settlement possessed various types of land necessary
for everyday life (e. g. arable land, meadows, water surfaces and probably extensive pastures too). Consequently, these settlements often had extensive areas used
for different purposes in late medieval times, and various types of land-use forms
are documented in the same medieval charters for these settlements (e. g. forest/
woodland, meadows, pasture, hayland, arable land, water bodies, sand, etc.).
Moreover, when reported, arboreal vegetation is located in areas further from the
lands defined as sand, as shown very clearly for example in the area of Cegld.
Although archaeo-geomorphological investigations have enabled us to identify
periods with more intensive sand movements (in the 11th13th, mid-13th and
15th centuries), the detection of changes over time is not really possible (neither
for sand nor for arboreal vegetation) from the scarce documentary evidence available. As for the spatial distribution of arboreal vegetation documented in contemporary sources it is worth noting (but without drawing any further conclusions)
that more forests, trees and bushes are generally mentioned close to the boundaries of the Sand Ridge area, while very little information on any arboreal vegetation is available in the central part of the study area (see fig. 3).
A comparison of the information gained from the medieval documents with
the reconstruction available for the quite richly-documented 18th century brings
further insights. In a manner reminiscent of the 18th century conditions, arboreal
262
Conclusion
The medieval sources concerning two important landscape elements (arboreal
vegetation and sand), are mostly the charters of the 14th and 15th centuries. Given
to the scarceness and content type of documents available for the medieval Sand
Ridge area, it is not possible to ascertain the proportion of land occupied by arboreal vegetation (e. g. forest cover) and open sand surfaces, nor is it possible to
determine the extent of the known forests or potential open sand areas. Nevertheless, it has been possible to identify some of the forests, the presence of arboreal
vegetation and the main tree species which clearly existed there in the Middle
Ages. Further, some sandy areas (and sometimes even soil types) with sparse or
no vegetation cover where sand might have moved have been recognised. All this
information can significantly extend and modify the picture of the medieval Sand
Ridge area so far known. Furthermore, comparing the medieval information with
the reconstruction of the vegetation history of the 18th century, carried out on the
basis of contemporary maps and descriptions, has yielded many insights.
Summary
The present study considers two important landscape elements, namely the sand
and arboreal vegetation that developed in the Sand Ridge area of the DanubeTisza Interfluve during the Middle Age. On the one hand, the contemporary written sources and the archaeological data provide the basis for an overview of the
evidence available; on the other hand, the focus is placed on the nature of the
relationship between these two significant features of the medieval landscape.
Numerous archaeological and geomorphological investigations have contributed
to reconstructing the development of moving sand dunes during the High and
Late Middle Ages. In addition, medieval documents define (often uniformly) regions where it is the sand and not the type of vegetation cover or the land-use that
is the decisive factor, probably referring to areas of sand with limited (or no)
ground cover. Further, in a few exceptional cases the written sources have led to
263
the recognition of potential sandy soil types and to the identification of (larger)
sand dunes already present in the region in medieval times. The evidence for forest/woodland, smaller stands and individual trees is mainly given in documents
which refer to the northern or north-western parts of the Sand Ridge area,
whereas the much sparser sources for the larger, southern part of the region rarely
mention the arboreal vegetation; this is similar to the situation known in the
18th century. The tree species mentioned in the written sources are mainly oak,
sometimes also pine, alder, poplar, ash and willow (as well as orchards in general).
Besides trees, shrubs and bushes such as juniper, elm and gorse also appear in
medieval (perambulation) charters. As for the relationship between the (sparsely
vegetated or open) sand surfaces and the tree cover (with special emphasis on
forests, orchards and smaller woodlands), we rely primarily on sand-related data
in the southern region, whereas in the smaller, northern area the balance is in
favour of the arboreal vegetation. Nevertheless, there is information for both
sand-related and vegetation cover available in the charters of specific settlements
with extensive landholdings that actually represent even if probably located far
from each other two aspects of a single management system combining different
functions and different forms of land-use (e. g. forest/woodland, meadows, pasture, haylands, arable land, water bodies and sandy areas).
Zusammenfassung
In dieser Studie werden zwei wichtige Landschaftselemente, nmlich die Sanddnen und die Baumvegetation in der Sandgratregion des Donau-TheiZwischenstromlands whrend des Mittelalters analysiert. Anhand schriftlicher
und archologischer Quellen wird einerseits versucht, die vergangene Landschaft
zu rekonstruieren; andererseits wird das Verhltnis dieser zwei wichtigen Elemente zueinander analysiert.
Aufgrund zahlreicher archologischer und geomorphologischer Untersuchungen wurde der Versuch unternommen, die Vernderung der Wanderdnen im hohen und spten Mittelalter nachzuzeichnen. Mittelalterliche Schriftquellen benennen (oft in bereinstimmung) Regionen, in denen die Sanddnen und nicht
die Art der Vegetation oder die Landnutzung als entscheidender Identifikationsfaktor galten, wobei sie sich wohl auf Sandflchen mit wenig (oder keiner) Vegetation beziehen. In Ausnahmefllen knnen anhand schriftlicher berlieferung
potentielle Regionen mit Sanddnen bestimmt werden, die dort bereits im Mittelalter prsent waren.
Vergleichbar zu der Situation des 18. Jahrhunderts sind die Belege fr Wlder
und Waldflchen, fr kleinere Baumgruppen oder einzelne Bume hauptschlich
in jenen mittelalterlichen Quellen zu finden, die sich auf die nrdlichen oder
nordwestlichen Teile der Sandgratregion beziehen, whrend fr die greren,
sdlichen Teile der Region Baumvegetation nur sehr selten in den Quellen genannt wird. Es werden meist Eiche, manchmal auch Kiefer, Erle, Pappel, Esche
und Weide (sowie Obstgrten im Allgemeinen) als Baumarten erwhnt. Neben
264
Bumen kommen zudem auch Strauch- und Buscharten sowie Wachholder, Ulme
und Ginster in den Schriftquellen vor. Sprlich bewachsene oder offene Sandflchen sind berwiegend fr die sdlichen Regionen mit Sanddnen belegt,
Baumflchen (mit besonderer Bercksichtigung von Wldern, Obstgrten und
kleineren Forstflchen) hingegen eher fr die kleinere, nrdliche Region. Dennoch sind sowohl die auf die Sandflchen, als auch die auf die Waldflchen bezogenen Daten in den Urkunden bestimmter Ortschaften mit umfangreichen Territorien berliefert. Diese besaen, teils weit voneinander entfernt, zwei Elemente
eines Landverwaltungssystems mit verschiedenen Funktionen und Formen der
Landnutzung (z. B. Forst/Wald, Wiesen, Weiden, Heugebiete, kultivierbares
Land, Gewsser und Sandgebiete).
265
References
Blint, Mariann (2007): Az rpd-kori teleplshlzat rekonstrukcija a Duna-Tisza
kz dli rszn [Reconstruction of the high-medieval settlement system in the southern
parts of the Danube-Tisza Interfluve]. Unpublished PhD dissertation on the University
of Szeged. Budapest.
Brtfai-Szab, Lszl (1938): Pest megye trtnetnek okleveles emlkei 10021599-ig:
fggelkl az Inrchi Farkas, az irsai Irsay, valamint a szilasi s pilisi Szilassy csaldok
trtnete [Charters to the history of Pest county 10021599: in appendix the history of
the Inrchi Farkas family, the Irsay family of Irsa and the Szilassy families of Szilas and
Pilis]. Budapest.
Benedek, Gyula and Krti, Lszl (2004): Bene, Lajos s Mizse oklevelei, trtneti dokumentumai 13851877 [Charters and historical documents of Bana, Lajos and Mizse,
13851877]. Kecskemt.
Benyhe, Balzs (2013): Agrogn hatsra kialakul felsznformk s folyamatok vizsglata
eltr geomorfolgiai adottsg terleteken [Investigations on the morphology and
morphological processes of agrogen origin in study areas with different geomorphological conditions]. PhD dissertation at the University of Szeged. Szeged.
Bir, Marianna (2006): A trtneti trkpekre alapul vegetcirekonstrukci s alkalmazsai a Duna-Tisza kzn [Vegetation reconstruction on the basis of historical maps
and its applications in the Danube-Tisza Interfluve]. PhD dissertation at the University
of Pcs. Pcs.
Bir, Marianna (2008): A Duna-Tisza kze fsszr vegetcijnak talakulsa a 18.
szzad ta, klns tekintettel a szraz homokterletekre [Changes of the arboreal
vegetation in the Danube-Tisza Interfluve since the 18th century, with special interest
on dry sand areas]. In: Krel-Dulay, Gyrgy; Kalapos, Tibor and Mojzes, Andrea
[eds.]: Talaj-vegetci-klma klcsnhatsok [Soil-vegetation-climate interactions].
Vcrtt, pp. 2338.
Bir, Marianna and Molnr, Zsolt (2009): Az Alfld erdei a folyszablyozsok s az
alfldfsts eltti vszzadban. Kzmr, Mikls [ed.]: Krnyezettrtnet 1. Az elmlt
500 v krnyezeti esemnyei trtneti s termszettudomnyi forrsok tkrben
[Environmental history 1. The environmental events of the last 500 years in the light
of historical and natural scientific evidence]. Budapest.
Borsy, Zoltn (1977): A Duna-Tisza kze homokformi s a homokmozgs szakaszai
[Sand forms and sand movement periods in the Danube-Tisza Interfluve]. In: Alfldi
tanulmnyok, pp. 4353.
Borsy, Zoltn (1987): Az Alfld hordalkkpjainak fejldstrtnete [Evolution history
of the colluviums in the Great Hungarian Plain]. In: Acta Academiae Paedagogicae
Nyregyhziensis, pp. 542.
Borsy, Zoltn (1989): Az Alfld hordalkkpjainak negyedidszaki fejldstrtnete
[Quaternary evolution history of the colluviums in the Great Hungarian Plain]. In:
Fldrajzi rtest 38, 34, pp. 211223.
Borsy, Zoltn (1991): Blown sand territories in Hungary. In: Zeitschrift fr Geomorphologie, Suppl. 90, pp. 114.
Cholnoky, Jen (1902): A futhomok mozgsnak trvnyei [Laws of sand movement].
In: Fldrajzi Kzlemnyek 32, pp. 638.
Csnky, Dezs and Grdonyi, Albert [eds.] (1936): Budapest trtnetnek okleveles emlkei I [Charters to the history of Budapest]. Budapest.
266
267
268
Nyri, Dina and Kiss, Tmea (2005a): Homokmozgsok vizsglata a Duna-Tisza kzn
[Analysis of snad movements in the Danube Tisza Interfluve]. In: Fldrajzi
Kzlemnyek 129, pp. 133147.
Nyri, Dina and Kiss, Tmea (2005b): Holocn futhomok-mozgsok Bcs-Kiskun
megyben rgszeti leletek tkrben [Holocene sand movements in Bcs-Kiskun
county in the light of archaeological findings]. In: Cumania 20, pp. 8394.
Nyri, Dina; Kiss, Tmea and Sipos, Gyrgy; Knipl, Istvn and Wicker, Erika (2006a): Az
emberi tevkenysg tjforml hatsa: futhomok-mozgsok a trtnelmi idkben
Apostag krnykn [Human impact forming the landscape: sand movements in
historical times, in the Apostag area]. In: Fleky, Gyrgy [ed.]: A tjvltozsai a
Krpt-medencben: Telepls a tjban [Landscape changes in the Carpathian
Basin: Settlement in the landscape]. Gdll, pp. 170175.
Nyri, Dina; Kiss, Tmea and Sipos, Gyrgy (2006b): Trtneti idkben bekvetkezett
futhomokmozgsok datlsa lumineszcencis mdszerrel a Duna-Tisza kzn [Sand
movements in historical times dated by thermoluminescense methods in the Danube
Tisza Interfluve]. III. Magyar Fldrajzi Konferencia. CD kiadvny. Budapest.
Nyri, Dina; Kiss, Tmea and Sipos, Gyrgy (2007): Investigation of Holocene blownsand movement based on archaeological findings and OSL dating, Danube-Tisza
Interfluve, Hungary. In: Journal of Maps Student Edition, pp. 4657.
Nyri, Dina; Knipl, Istvn; Kiss, Tmea and Wicker, Erika (2009): Termszet s ember
tallkozsa: futhomokmozgsok az elmlt 2000 vben Apostag krnykn [Interfering people and nature: sand movements in the last 1000 years, in the Apostag
area]. In: Tisicum 19, pp. 447456.
Nyri, Dina and Kiss, Tmea (2009): Blown sand movements at Kiskunhalas on the
Danube-Tisza Interfluve, Hungary. In: Journal of Environmental Geography 2,
pp. 3136.
Nyri, Dina and Rosta, Szabolcs (2009): Kzpkori sznts a homok alatt. Elzetes jelents Kiskunhalas hatrbl [Medieval plowing under the sand. Preliminary report from
the Kiskunhalas area]. In: Szakl, Aurl [ed.]: Halasi Mzeum 3. Emlkknyv a
Thorma Jnos Mzeum 135. vforduljra. Kiskunhalas, pp. 2734.
Nyri, Dina; Knipl, Istvn; Kiss, Tmea and Sipos, Gyrgy (2012): Environmental
changes in historical times near Kecel on the Danube-Tisza Interfluve, Hungary.
Archeological research and optically stimulated liminescence (OSL) dating. In:
Archeometriai Mhely 1, pp. 3138.
Plczi Horvth, Andrs (1987): Kutak Szentkirlyon [Wells in Szentkirly]. In:
Mzeumi Kutatsok Bcs-Kiskun megyben 19861987, Kecskemt, pp. 8688.
Pcsi, Mrton [ed.] (1967): Magyarorszg tjfldrajza. A dunai Alfld [Landscape
geography of Hungary. The Danube Great Plain]. Vol. 1. Budapest.
Reizner, Jnos (1991): Szeged trtnete [History of Szeged]. Vol. 4. Szeged.
Reszegi, Katalin (2008): Hegynevek a kzpkori Magyarorszgon [Hill toponyms in
medieval Hungary]. PhD dissertation at the University of Debrecen. Debrecen.
Rosta, Szabolcs (2009): jabb eredmnyek a kunok Duna-Tisza kzi szllsterletnek
kutatsban [Recent results in the research on the settling area of Cumans in the
Danube Tisza Interfluve]. In: Rosta, Szabolcs [ed.]: Kun-kp. A magyarorszgi kunok
hagyatka. Tanulmnyok Horvth Ferenc 60. szletsnapja tiszteletre [Cumanpicture. Heritage of Cumans in Hungary. Studies in honour to Ferenc Horvth on his
60th birthday]. Kiskunflegyhza, pp. 175216.
Simon, Tibor (1967): Duna-Tisza kzi Htsg. Termszetes nvnytakar. In: Pcsi,
Mrton [ed.]: Magyarorszg tjfldrajza. A dunai Alfld [Landscape geography of
Hungary. The Danube Great Plain]. Vol. 1. Budapest, pp. 233236.
269