Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Page 1 of 2
ANALYSIS:
The bonus received by Mr. Ledesma is not considered as civil fruits of the land
mortgaged despite the fact that it generates from the land itself. It is given to Mr.
Ledesma as compensation to their willingness to take risk for the said mortgaged.
CONCLUSION:
The Supreme Court decided that the bonus received by Mr. Ledesma is not considered
as civil fruits of the land mortgaged therefore the third party creditor doesnt have any
right for the said bonus.
Page 2 of 2