Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Steven Golbeck
Northwestern University, Department of Industrial Engineering & Management Sciences
Steven Golbeck
39
X
k=0
or:
5000
(1 + r)40 1
r
= 1, 000, 000
Example
7% is the IRR associated with a cashflow stream of:
(x0 , x1 , , x39 , x40 ) = (0, 5, 5, , 5, 1000 5)
That is, the NPV of this cash flow stream is equal to 0 for r = 7%. The present
value of all the payments into the savings account is equivalent to the lump sum
received at retirement.
Note that if your relative invested at a lower rate, they would have less upon
retirement. If your relative invested at a higher rate, they would have more upon
retirement.
Steven Golbeck
What is IRR?
The Internal Rate of Return (IRR) of a cash flow stream:
(x0 , x1 , , xn1 , xn )
is defined as the rate i such that NPV=0 using i as the discount rate:
n
X
k=0
xk
=0
(1 + i)k
IRR has different interpretations depending upon the form of the cash flows:
1
Investment stream (first xk < 0 then xj > 0): the IRR is the rate of return on
the investment.
Borrowing stream (first xk > 0 then xj < 0): the IRR is the rate of cost, or rate
of financing.
So in one case, a high IRR is desirable (investment), whereas in the other case, a low
IRR is desirable (borrowing). We will mainly focus on investment streams.
Steven Golbeck
Figure: J. R. Graham and C. R. Harvey, The Theory and Practice of Corporate Finance: Evidence
from the Field, Journal of Financial Economics, MayJune 2001, pp. 187244.
Steven Golbeck
Steven Golbeck
Steven Golbeck
Steven Golbeck
1
(1 + r)5
1
= $8, 315.09
0
9000
1
9000
2
9000
3
9000
Steven Golbeck
4
0
5
-8315
6
-8315
7
-8315
8
-8315
9
-8315
Year
Cash Flow
0
9000
1
9000
2
9000
3
9000
4
0
5
-8315
6
-8315
7
-8315
8
-8315
To determine the IRR, we solve for i such that the NPV of the cash flow stream is
equal to 0:
9
X
xi
=0
(1
+
i)k
k=0
In this case we can write this as:
1
9000
1
8315
1
9000 +
1
=0
i
(1 + i)3
(1 + i)4 i
(1 + i)5
Using Excel SOLVER, we obtain i = 2.66%.
The IRR represents the interest rate that makes the benefits received from the
loan equal to the payments she makes to pay it off.
In this case, the IRR< 5%, the interest rate that goes into effect after she
graduates, so Maria got a good deal on the loan.
Steven Golbeck
9
-8315
Steven Golbeck
i
(1 + 4i )3
4
Using Excel SOLVER, we obtain that i = 0.388, so the annual interest rate
compounded quarterly that the insurance company is charging is 38.8%.
Clearly unless the corporation has no cash or cannot obtain a loan at a lower rate,
they should pay the upfront lump sum.
Steven Golbeck
Incremental IRR
Suppose we are considering multiple investments, each with a different upfront
cost, x0 .
To determine which investment we should take on, we can perform Incremental
IRR analysis.
The idea is that you should continue to invest as long as each additional
increment of investment exceeds the MARR, assuring profit when taking into
account the cost of capital (here the MARR).
Intuition
Suppose you have project A and B, with B having a higher initial upfront cost.
Write B = A + (B A).
You can think of B as the cash flow from A plus an incremental return given by
B A.
If A has a desirable IRR, and B A has a desirable incremental IRR, then we
should make the larger investment in B.
Steven Golbeck
Compute the IRR of the option with the smallest initial investment. If the IRR
exceeds the MARR, then this is a viable investment. If IRR<MARR, it is not
viable and you should consider the option with the next smallest initial
investment. (if no IRR>MARR, none are viable).
When you have found an option with IRR>MARR, determine the internal rate of
return associated with the increment of investment required to move from the
current attractive investment option to the one requiring more initial investment.
If the IRR associated with this, called the incremental IRR, exceeds the MARR,
then the higher investment alternative is preferred and this becomes the preferred
alternative.
Continue to compute the incremental IRR associated with going from the
preferred alternative to the one with the higher initial investment.
When you have exhausted all alternatives, your investment decision is the
preferred alternative.
Steven Golbeck
Example
You are considering two projects for investment, and you can only invest in one:
Year
0
1
A
-10
15
B
-20
28
You have $30 in capital and any funds you do not invest in these projects may be
invested elsewhere at the MARR of 6%. Which should you choose?
Steven Golbeck
Example
You are considering two projects for investment, and you can only invest in one:
Year
0
1
A
-10
15
B
-20
28
You have $30 in capital and any funds you do not invest in these projects may be
invested elsewhere at the MARR of 6%. Which should you choose?
Year
0
1
A
-10
15
B
-20
28
B-A
-10
13
A
-1000
300
300
300
300
300
Steven Golbeck
B
-1350
375
375
375
375
375
A
-1000
300
300
300
300
300
B
-1350
375
375
375
375
375
300
1
1
iA
(1 + iA )5
Example
Next, do the Incremental IRR analysis:
Year
0
1
2
3
4
5
0 = 350 +
A
-1000
300
300
300
300
300
75
iBA
B
-1350
375
375
375
375
375
1
B-A
-350
75
75
75
75
75
1
(1 + iBA )5
which yields iBA = 0.02, which is smaller than the MARR, so choose alternative A.
Steven Golbeck
Summary
You can use IRR analysis for acception-rejection decisions when the cash flow
streams are either of the investment or borrowing type.
When ranking mutually exclusive alternatives (you can only select one of the
projects), use incremental analysis.
For more complicated cash flow streams (more than one sign change), IRR
analysis is more subtle. NPV analysis is likely easier.
Steven Golbeck
Capital Budgeting
Steven Golbeck
Project
1
2
..
.
n-1
n
Upfront Cost
(ci > 0)
c1
c2
..
.
cn1
cn
NPV
(bi > 0)
b1
b2
..
.
bn1
bn
subject to:
n
X
i=1
n
X
b i xi
c i xi C
i=1
xi = 0 or 1 for i = 1, 2, n
Steven Golbeck
Capital Budgeting
Project
1
2
3
4
Upfront Cost
500
400
200
300
NPV
300
200
70
85
Example
We are considering 4 projects, but only have a budget of 1000. Which should we
fund?
The problem is set up as:
maximize
subject to:
Capital Budgeting
Interdependent Projects
Now suppose we have multiple investment opportunities, but for each opportunity
there are multiple options.
Example:
We can invest in a production line, but can only choose one type of machine from
several alternatives
In addition, we can invest in R&D, but only fund at most one project.
Steven Golbeck
OPTION
1
2
..
.
n1 1
n1
PROJECT 1
Upfront Cost
c11
c12
..
.
c1(n1 1)
c1n1
NPV
b11
b12
..
.
b1(n1 1)
b1n1
OPTION
1
2
..
.
nm 1
nm
PROJECT m
Upfront Cost
cm1
cm2
..
.
cm(nm 1)
cm,nm
NPV
bm1
bm2
..
.
bm(nm 1)
bm,nm
Steven Golbeck
maximize
ni
m X
X
bij xij
i=1 j=1
subject to:
ni
m X
X
cij xij C
i=1 j=1
ni
X
j=1