Professional Documents
Culture Documents
txt
Citation Nr: 1630403
Decision Date: 07/29/16
DOCKET NO.
)
)
2.
REPRESENTATION
Veteran represented by: Disabled American Veterans
WITNESS AT HEARING ON APPEAL
Veteran
ATTORNEY FOR THE BOARD
Mary E. Rude, Associate Counsel
INTRODUCTION
The Veteran served on active duty from August 2005 to July 2009.
These matters come before the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) on appeal
The Veteran currently has a thoracic spine disability, and evidence ind
2.
The Veteran currently has a bilateral knee disability, and evidence ind
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
1.
The criteria for service connection for a thoracic spine disability hav
2. The criteria for service connection for a bilateral knee disability hav
REASONS AND BASES FOR FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS
The Veteran's former colleague submitted a statement stating that the Veter
After reviewing all of the evidence of record, the Board finds that the cri
The Veteran has been found to have current disabilities of the thoracic spi
The Board also finds that it is as likely as not that he incurred in-servic
Lastly, the Board finds that the evidence is at least in equipoise regardin
The Veteran also submitted a July 2013 letter from his private physician.
A September 2013 letter from another private physician stated that the Vete
The Board does acknowledge that the October 2012 and January 2014 VA examin
The Board therefore finds that the evidence is at least in equipoise regard
ORDER
____________________________________________
BRIANNE OGILVIE
Acting Veterans Law Judge, Board of Veterans' Appeals
Department of Veterans Affairs