Regent University CAS Student Teacher Evaluation

#233

SurveyMonkey

COMPLETE
Collector: Web Link 1 (Web Link)
Started: Tuesday, October 25, 2016 11:15:04 AM
Last Modified: Tuesday, October 25, 2016 11:23:40 AM
Time Spent: 00:08:35
IP Address: 204.126.10.200

PAGE 1: Placement Information

Q1: Student Teacher's Name

Natalie King

Q2: Student Teacher's Endorsement Area

Elementary Education, PreK-6

Q3: Grade Taught

Fifth Grade

Q4: Internship Start Date (MM/DD/YYYY)

08/26/2016

Q5: Internship End Date (MM/DD/YYYY)

10/14/2016

Q6: School of Student Teaching Placement

Three Oaks Elementary

Q7: School Division

Virginia Beach City Public Schools

Q8: Evaluator's Name (First Last)

Lyn Green

Q9: Evaluator's Email. We will return a PDF copy of your report to this address.
Email Address:
lynmike6@verizon.net
Q10: Evaluator's Position/Role

Classroom Teacher

Q11: What time period is this evaluation for?

Final

PAGE 2: Standard One: Professional Knowledge

Q12: Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.
Demonstrates accurate knowledge and skills of the subject
area(s) taught.

Exemplary

Demonstrates an understanding of the development of the

age group.

Exemplary

Integrates key content elements and facilitates students

use of higher level thinking skills.

Superior

Links content with other subject areas and real world

applications.

Superior

Q13: Please comment on the teacher candidate's overall performance in the area of professional knowledge.
Natalie was always very profeesional

1/4

Regent University CAS Student Teacher Evaluation

SurveyMonkey

PAGE 3: Standard Two: Instructional Planning

Q14: Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.
Aligns lesson objectives to the schools curriculum and
student learning needs.

Exemplary

Develops appropriate plans designed to meet all learner

needs; adapts plans as needed.

Superior

Plans time realistically for pacing, content mastery, and

transitions.

Exemplary

Plans for differentiated instruction.

Superior

Q15: Please comment on the teacher candidate's overall effectiveness of instructional planning.
Natalie was very thorough in her planning and was superior at differentiating instruction. She was exemplary at keeping
up with the rigor of the curriculum.

PAGE 4: Standard Three: Instructional Delivery

Q16: Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.
Engages and maintains students in active learning.

Exemplary

Differentiates instruction to meet the students needs.

Superior

Reinforces learning goals consistently throughout lessons.

Exemplary

Uses a variety of effective instructional strategies and

resources.

Superior

Uses instructional technology to enhance student learning.

Exemplary

Q17: Please comment on the teacher candidate's overall effectiveness of instructional delivery.
Natalie was effective on delivering the instruction to the students in all subject areas.

PAGE 5: Standard Four: Assessment of and for Student Learning

Q18: Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.
Uses student learning data to make instructional decisions.

Superior

Uses a variety of appropriate assessment strategies and

instruments

Exemplary

Uses assessment tools for both formative and summative

purposes.

Superior

Gives constructive and frequent student feedback.

Exemplary

2/4

Regent University CAS Student Teacher Evaluation

SurveyMonkey

Q19: Please comment on the teacher candidate's performance in the area of assessment of and for student
learning.
Natalie was superior in using data to drive instruction. This is a hard thing for student teachers to learn and carry out.
She was very personal to the students and gave feedback to the students very well.

PAGE 6: Standard Five: Learning Environment

Q20: Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.
Establishes clear expectations for classroom rules and
procedures; enforces them consistently and fairly.

Superior

Uses available resources and knowledge of students to

prevent, redirect, or reinforce behaviors.

Superior

Respects students diversity, including language, culture,

race, gender, and special needs.

Exemplary

Actively listens and pays attention to students needs and

responses.

Exemplary

Q21: Please comment on the teacher candidate's overall effectiveness in creating an environment conducive
to learning.
Natalie changed her approaches often to gain control of the classroom. She used a variety of techniques and was
receptive to advice for classroom management.

PAGE 7: Standard Six: Professionalism

Q22: Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.
Modifies performance based on personal and professional
critiques.

Exemplary

Demonstrates initiative in planning, management, and

professional interactions.

Exemplary

Demonstrates effective communication and collaboration

with teachers and other school personnel.

Exemplary

Fosters trust in all school relationships through fair and

ethical interactions.

Exemplary

Q23: Please comment on the teacher candidate's

professionalism throughout the period of observation.

Respondent skipped this

question

PAGE 8: Standard Seven: Student Academic Progress

3/4

Regent University CAS Student Teacher Evaluation

SurveyMonkey

Q24: Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.
Documents the progress of each student throughout the
placement.

Superior

Provides evidence that achievement goals have been met.

Exemplary

Uses available data to document/communicate student

progress and develop learning targets.

Superior

Q25: Please comment on the students academic progress throughout the period of observation.
Students actively learned new concepts that Natalie taught them.

4/4