Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Instructions:
1. In the "Selection Criteria" tab, customize weightings to match current business priorities. Be sure that your total weight equals no more or less than 100%.
2. In the "Project Scoring" tab, rank each project on a scale of 1-10 based on how well it meets the selection criteria.
3. Evaluate project scores in the "Rankings" tab to make resource allocation decisions.
4. Use the "Bubble Matrix" tab to communicate project rankings for strategic fit, economic impact, and feasibility.
Selection Criteria
Customize this tool by changing the weighting scale for each selection criterion. Feel free to modify the selection criteria as required.
Strategic Fit
Selection Criteria
Weighting Scale
Economic Impact
Feasibility
Total
Alignment with
Goals
Market
Positioning
Capabilities
Revenue
Potential
Cost/Benefit
Low Cost
Technical Risk
Resources Financial
Resources People
Weight
15%
15%
10%
10%
15%
15%
10%
5%
5%
100%
Ranking Critieria:
Definitions:
Market Positioning
Core Capabilities
Does this initiative leverage our core capabilities (technology, operations, sales)?
Revenue Potential
Cost/Beneft
Low Cost
Technical Risk
Resources - Financial
Resources - People
Project Scoring
Rank each Project on a scale of 1-10 for each criteria. There is a drop-down box for each Green, Amber, and Red cell.
Strategic Fit
Economic Impact
Feasibility
Alignment with
Goals
Market
Positioning
Capabilities
Revenue Potential
Cost/Benefit
Low Cost
Technical Risk
Resources Financial
Resources People
15%
15%
10%
10%
15%
15%
10%
5%
5%
Upgrade to Product A
10
10
ISO Certification
10
Rankings
Sort by selecting all Projects & Initiatives, Project Score, Strategic Fit, Economic Impact and Feasibility cells. Click "Data" and "Sort", and sort by Project Score (Largest to Smallest).
Project Score
Strategic Fit
Economic Impact
Feasibility
7.7
2.9
3.1
1.7
7.6
3.3
2.9
1.4
6.6
2.7
2.7
1.2
5.7
3.2
2.0
0.6
5.5
2.0
2.0
1.6
ISO Certification
5.2
0.9
2.8
1.5
5.0
1.6
2.2
1.3
4.6
2.2
1.6
0.8
Upgrade to Product A
4.3
1.3
2.5
0.6
2.4
0.7
1.4
0.4
Future Potentials
Top Priorities
Feasibility
High
Low
Potential Cuts
Low
Back Burners
Strategic Fit
High