Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1.
Introduction.
o~e
is
In "weighted residual
[1,2]
- 209 -
Let the
of change be
L(u) - au
at = o ' x'
e:
v'
>
o'
( 2. l)
where L is a differential operator involving spatial derivatives only and V, a three dimensional domain with boundary
s.
For simplicity, we assume that there are no constitutive relations to take care of.
Boundary condition :
( 2. 2)
U(X,t)
( 2. 3)
Initial condition :
To solve this we assume a trial solution,
( 2. 4)
- 210 -
condition.
differential equation
residual
( 2. 6)
( 2. 7)
When, however,
(2.8)
number.
Equation
preceding
differential equations.
Once
Ci(t) are determined this way, one can obtain the approximate
solution by substitution in equation (2.4).
In addition, we have in the field two modified versions
of the method, which are given below .
( A )
.Boundary method:
RB and R
1
are treated as in (2.9) and (2.10), and in (2.9) spatial
- 211 -
t3]
Mixed method:
L4J.
un~
suggested by Synder et al
[5]
and
(b)
J '
-]
[7]
Sub-domain method
; " L,
\
212 -
v.
v.
1, 2, N
(iii)
(a)
Here
w.
J
aR(UT)
ac.
ci = o.
Galerkin method
= U.(X,t)
~ -
To name a few,
(ii)
- 213 -
[2~ ),
approximat~ng
functions.
In
For other
- 214 -
3.
Variational Methods
( 3 .1)
then
oi
dt
a*.
( 3. 2)
= x 8 (t)
LNc.x.(t)
i=l
( 3. 3)
- 215 -
c.l
only.
Now putting
ar
-;:-;o;a~.-.
::
(3.4),
'
we obtain
Sub-
( 3. 5)
:: 1,2 ... N
( 3. 6)
c ..
~
4.
Corrunents
- 216 -
conditions
(a)
[9]
On analysis, this
least squares and shares with it thelimited applicability the limitation almost breaking down in the case of problems
of
trans~ent
performance.
(ii)
In (i)
[10],
ariational principle.
n~
rI
0
[L(U)
_ au
at
- 217 -
6U dV
(4.1)
au =
at
6 J
y
[L(u) -
y)
6u dv
0 J
( 4. 2)
As Serrin (12)
In such situations,
[131
Both
schemes are being vigorously followed during the last two decades
or so.
us a constitutive relation.
This
Thus the
[1s]
has suggested.
However, the variational principle may have some
- 218 -
(a)
The closeness of
[16,17]
Part
gi~ng
aT
()
I(
T,~
- J( T )
~
J+l
( 5. 1)
I(T,~)d~
( 5. 2)
-1
~:
I(T,~)
to the outward
(T,!-l)
=
( 5. 4)
ai(x,\.l,t) +
ai(x,\.l,t)
dt
\.1
dX
= xCx,t)
and
~T 4 -ICx,\.l,t~
(5.5)
( 5. 6)
- 220 -
the
With
( 5. 7)
( 5. 8)
aT
a ay
ST 4
J -
( 5. 9)
and
I =
I*<T,~,y>
oi<<,~,y>
~aT
l a~~*
- J*
SaT
+ (aS/5)T 5
dTdy
(5.11)
I*, T
= T*
(19]
- 221 -
References
1.
Crandall S. H.
Engineering Analysis.
McGraw Hill,
(1956).
2.
Collatz L.
Equations.
Schuleshl<o P.
~'
1-7. , 8-16,
(1959).
5.
6.
~'
AICHE
535 .0964).
Approxima-
8.
Picone M.
9. .
~'
Ing. Grav.
~'
25 (1923).
225 (1928).
Robert P. H.
University of
Rosen P.
J. Chern. Phys.
J. App. Phys.
12.
Serrin J.
~'
~'
1220, (1953)
336, (1954).
14.
Biot M. A.
Physica
~,
351 (1964).
- 222 -
15.
16.
17.
351 (1962)
Ann. d'Astrophysique ~
377, 1975
19.
Schechter
~.
20.
R. S. and Himmelblau, D. M.
Phys. Fluids
1431 (1965)
- 223 -