Professional Documents
Culture Documents
UPDATED
8/18/03
12:07 PM
Page 1
CHAPTER 9
TABLE OF CONTENTS
DESIGN EXAMPLES
NOTATION
9.0
INTRODUCTION
9.1
9.2
9.3
9.4
9.5
9.6
9.7
9.8
JUL 03
7065 Ch 9 Cont.UPDATED
8/18/03
12:07 PM
Page 3
CHAPTER 9
NOTATION
DESIGN EXAMPLES
A
A
Ab
Ac
Ac
Acv
Ao
Aps
APT
As
As
As
Asf
Asr
A*s
As
Av
Av
Avf
Avh
Av-min
a
a
a
b
b
b
b
b
be
bv
bv
bv
bw
CRc
CRs
c
c
D
D
7065 Ch 9 Cont.UPDATED
8/18/03
12:07 PM
Page 4
CHAPTER 9
NOTATION
DESIGN EXAMPLES
DC
DFD
DFM
DFm
DFV
DW
d
db
dc
de
de
dp
dv
E
Ec
Ec
Eci
Ep
ES
Es
Es
e
e
e
ec
ee
eg
Fb
Fpi
F
fb
f c
f c
fcdp
fcds
fcir
f ci
7065 Ch 9 Cont.UPDATED
8/18/03
12:07 PM
Page 5
CHAPTER 9
NOTATION
DESIGN EXAMPLES
f ci
fcgp
fd
fpb
fpc
fpc
fpe
fpe
fpi
fpo
fps
fpt
fpu
fpy
fr
fr
fs
f s
fse
fsi
f *su
ft
ftc
ftg
fy
fy
fy
f y
fyh
H
H
h
h
7065 Ch 9 Cont.UPDATED
8/18/03
12:07 PM
Page 6
CHAPTER 9
NOTATION
DESIGN EXAMPLES
hc
hf
I
I
I
Ic
IM
J
K
Kg
k
k
L
L
L
L
L
Lc
LL
ld
lx
Ma
Mb
Mb
Mc
MCIP
Mconst
Mcol
Mcr
Mcr
M *cr
MD
Md
Md/nc
Mf
Mg
MLL
MLL+I
MLL+I
MLT
[LRFD]
[STD]
[LRFD]
[STD]
[LRFD]
[STD]
[LRFD]
[LRFD]
[STD]
[STD]
[STD]
[LRFD]
[LRFD]
[LRFD]
[LRFD]
[LRFD]
[STD]
[LRFD]
[STD]
[STD]
JUL 03
7065 Ch 9 Cont.UPDATED
8/18/03
12:07 PM
Page 7
CHAPTER 9
NOTATION
DESIGN EXAMPLES
Mmax
Mn
Mn
Mn/dc
Mr
Ms
Ms
MSDL
Mservice
MSIP
Mu
Mu
Mws
Mx
m
m
Nb
NL
Nu
n
P
P
Pc
Peff
Pi
Ppe
Pr
Ps
Pse
Psi
P20
Q
Qi
q
RH
Rn
Ru
Rw
S
S
S
7065 Ch 9 Cont.UPDATED
8/18/03
12:07 PM
Page 8
CHAPTER 9
NOTATION
DESIGN EXAMPLES
S
S
Sb
Sbc
SH
SR
St
Stc
Stg
s
s
s
T
t
t
tf
ts
ts
Vc
Vc
Vci
Vcw
Vd
Vi
VLL
VLL+I
VLL+I
VLT
Vmu
Vn
Vnh
Vp
Vp
Vs
Vs
Vu
[STD]
LRFD]
[STD]
[STD]
[STD]
[LRFD]
[LRFD]
[LRFD]
[STD]
[LRFD]
[STD]
[STD]
[STD]
[STD]
[LRFD]
[STD]
[STD]
[LRFD]
[STD]
[LRFD]
[STD]
JUL 03
7065 Ch 9 Cont.UPDATED
8/18/03
12:07 PM
Page 9
CHAPTER 9
NOTATION
DESIGN EXAMPLES
Vu
= factored shear force at section
[LRFD]
Vuh
= factored horizontal shear force per unit length of the beam
[LRFD]
Vx
= shear force at a distance (x) from the support
v
= factored shear stress
[LRFD]
W
= overall width of bridge measured perpendicular to the longitudinal beams
[STD]
w
= a uniformly distributed load
[LRFD]
w
= width of clear roadway
[LRFD]
wb
= weight of barriers
wc
= unit weight of concrete
[STD]
wc
= unit weight of concrete
[LRFD]
wg
= beam self-weight
ws
= slab and haunch weights
wws
= weight of future wearing surface
X
= distance from load to point of support
[STD]
x
= the distance from the support to the section under question
yb
= distance from centroid to the extreme bottom fiber of the non-composite precast beam
ybc
= distance from the centroid of the composite section to extreme bottom fiber of the precast beam
ybs
= distance from the center of gravity of strands to the bottom fiber of the beam
yt
= distance from centroid to the extreme top fiber of the non-composite precast beam
ytc
= distance from the centroid of the composite section to extreme top fiber of the slab
ytg
= distance from the centroid of the composite section to extreme top fiber of the precast beam
Z (or z)= factor reflecting exposure conditions
[LRFD], [STD]
= factor indicating ability of diagonally cracked concrete to transmit tension (a value indicating
concrete contribution)
[LRFD]
D
= load combination coefficient for dead loads
[STD]
L
= load combination coefficient for live loads
[STD]
1
= factor for concrete strength
[STD]
1
= ratio of the depth of the equivalent uniformly stressed compression zone assumed in the
strength limit state to the depth of the actual compression zone
[LRFD]
beam = deflection due to beam self-weight
b+ws = deflection due to barrier and wearing surface weights
fcdp = change in concrete stress at center of gravity of pretensioning steel due to dead loads except
the dead load acting at the time of the pretensioning force is applied
[LRFD]
fpCR = loss in pretensioning steel stress due to creep
[LRFD]
fpES = loss in pretensioning steel stress due to elastic shortening
[LRFD]
fpi
= total loss in pretensioning steel stress immediately after transfer
fpR = loss in pretensioning steel stress due to relaxation of steel
[LRFD]
fpR1 = loss in pretensioning steel stress due to relaxation of steel at transfer
[LRFD]
fpR2 = loss in pretensioning steel stress due to relaxation of steel after transfer
[LRFD]
fpSR = loss in pretensioning steel stress due to shrinkage
[LRFD]
JUL 03
7065 Ch 9 Cont.UPDATED
8/18/03
12:07 PM
Page 10
CHAPTER 9
NOTATION
DESIGN EXAMPLES
fpT
D
L
LL+I
LL
LT
max
p
SDL
slab
x
*
i
actual
b
*
A *s
[LRFD]
[LRFD]
[STD]
[STD]
[LRFD]
[LRFD]
[STD]
[STD]
[LRFD]
[LRFD]
[STD]
[LRFD]
[LRFD]
[STD]
[STD]
JUL 03
TABLE OF CONTENTS
BULB-TEE (BT-72), SINGLE SPAN, COMPOSITE DECK, LRFD SPECIFICATIONS
9.4.1
INTRODUCTION
9.4.2
MATERIALS
9.4.3
9.4.4
9.4.5
9.4.6
PRESTRESS LOSSES
9.4.6.1 Elastic Shortening
9.4.6.2 Shrinkage
9.4.6.3 Creep of Concrete
9.4.6.4 Relaxation of Prestressing Strand
9.4.6.4.1 Relaxation before Transfer
9.4.6.4.2 Relaxation after Transfer
9.4.6.5 Total Losses at Transfer
9.4.6.6 Total Losses at Service Loads
JUL 03
8/15/03, 9:40 AM
TABLE OF CONTENTS
BULB-TEE (BT-72), SINGLE SPAN, COMPOSITE DECK, LRFD SPECIFICATIONS
9.4.7
STRESSES AT TRANSFER
9.4.7.1 Stress Limits for Concrete
9.4.7.2 Stresses at Transfer Length Section
9.4.7.3 Stresses at Harp Points
9.4.7.4 Stresses at Midspan
9.4.7.5 Hold-Down Forces
9.4.7.6 Summary of Stresses at Transfer
9.4.8
9.4.9
9.4.10
LIMITS OF REINFORCEMENT
9.4.10.1 Maximum Reinforcement
9.4.10.2 Minimum Reinforcement
9.4.11
SHEAR DESIGN
9.4.11.1 Critical Section
9.4.11.1.1 Angle of Diagonal Compressive Stresses
9.4.11.1.2 Effective Shear Depth
9.4.11.1.3 Calculation of Critical Section
9.4.11.2 Contribution of Concrete to Nominal Shear Resistance
9.4.11.2.1 Strain in Flexural Tension Reinforcement
9.4.11.2.1.1 Calculation for Negative Strain
9.4.11.2.1.2 Shear Stress
9.4.11.2.2 Values of and
9.4.11.2.3 Concrete Contribution
9.4.11.3 Contribution of Reinforcement to Nominal Shear Resistance
9.4.11.3.1 Requirement for Reinforcement
9.4.11.3.2 Required Area of Reinforcement
9.4.11.3.3 Spacing of Reinforcement
9.4.11.3.4 Minimum Reinforcement Requirement
9.4.11.4 Maximum Nominal Shear Resistance
JUL 03
8/15/03, 9:40 AM
TABLE OF CONTENTS
BULB-TEE (BT-72), SINGLE SPAN, COMPOSITE DECK, LRFD SPECIFICATIONS
9.4.12
9.4.13
9.4.14
9.4.15
JUL 03
8/15/03, 9:40 AM
Bulb-Tee (BT-72),
Single Span, Composite Deck,
LRFD Specifications
9.4.1
INTRODUCTION
This design example demonstrates the design of a 120-ft single span AASHTO-PCI
bulb-tee beam bridge with no skew. This example illustrates in detail the design of
a typical interior beam at the critical sections in positive flexure, shear, and deflection due to prestress, dead loads and live load. The superstructure consists of six
beams spaced at 9- 0 centers, as shown in Figure 9.4.1-1. Beams are designed to
act compositely with the 8-in. cast-in-place concrete deck to resist all superimposed
dead loads, live loads and impact. A 1/2 in. wearing surface is considered to be an
integral part of the 8-in. deck. Design live load is HL-93. The design is accomplished
in accordance with the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, 2nd Edition,
1998, and including through the 2003 Interim Revisions.
Figure 9.4.1-1
Bridge Cross-Section
51'-0"
48'- 0"
1'- 6"
1'- 6"
3'-0"
9.4.2
MATERIALS
3'-0"
JUL 03
8/15/03, 9:40 AM
Figure 9.4.2-1
AASHTO-PCI BT-72
Dimensions
JUL 03
8/15/03, 9:40 AM
f
Ec = modulus of elasticity, ksi = 33,000(wc)
where
wc = unit weight of concrete, kcf = 0.150 kcf
LRFD Article C5.4.2.4 indicates that the unit weight of normal weight concrete
is 0.145 kcf. However, precast concrete mixes typically have a relatively low
water/cement ratio and high density. Therefore, a unit weight of 0.150 kcf is used
in this example. For high strength concrete, this value may need to be increased
based on test results.
fc = specified strength of concrete, ksi
Therefore, the modulus of elasticity for:
1.5
9.4.3.2.2
Modular Ratio between
Slab and Beam Materials
9.4.3.2.3
Transformed
Section Properties
E c ( slab) 3,834
= 0.7845
=
E c ( beam ) 4,888
8/15/03, 9:40 AM
Due to camber of the precast, prestressed beam, a minimum haunch thickness of 1/2
in. at midspan is considered in the structural properties of the composite section.
Also, the width of haunch must be transformed.
Transformed width of haunch = (0.7845)(42) = 32.95 in.
Transformed area of haunch = (0.7845)(42)(0.5) = 16.47 in.2
Note that the haunch should only be considered to contribute to section properties
if it is required to be provided in the completed structure. Therefore, some designers
neglect its contribution to the section properties.
Figure 9.4.3.2.3-1
Dimensions of the
Composite Section.
108"
84.73"
32.95"
7.5"
0.5"
c.g. of composite
section
80"
72"
ybc
Table 9.4.3.2.3-1
Properties of Composite
Section
Beam
Area, in.2
yb, in.
Ayb, in.3
I, in. 4
I + A(Yb-yb)2, in.4
767.00
36.60
28,072.20
253,224.21
545,894.00
799,118.21
Haunch
16.47
72.25
1,189.96
5,032.42
0.34
5,032.76
Deck
634.45
76.25
448,453.06
293,190.53
2,978.79
296,169.32
1,418.92
77,715.22
1,100,320.29
JUL 03
8/15/03, 9:40 AM
Sbc = composite section modulus for the extreme bottom fiber of the precast beam
= (Ic/ybc) =
1,100,320
= 20,090 in.3
54.77
Stg = composite section modulus for the top fiber of the precast beam
= (Ic/ytg) =
1,100,320
= 63,861 in.3
17.23
Stc = composite section modulus for extreme top fiber of the deck slab
1
1 1,100,320
3
= (Ic / y tc ) =
= 55,592 in.
n
0.7845 25.23
9.4.4
SHEAR FORCES AND
BENDING MOMENTS
The self-weight of the beam and the weight of the deck and haunch act on the
non-composite, simple-span structure, while the weight of barriers, future wearing
surface, and live loads with impact act on the composite, simple-span structure. Refer
to Table 9.4.4-1 which follows Section 9.4.4 for a summary of unfactored values
calculated below.
9.4.4.1
Shear Forces and Bending
Moments Due to Dead Loads
9.4.4.1.1
Dead Loads
O.K.
JUL 03
8/15/03, 9:40 AM
9.4.4.1.1 Dead Loads/9.4.4.2.2 Live Load Distribution Factor for Typical Interior Beam
For a simply supported beam with span (L) loaded with a uniformly distributed load
(w), the shear force (Vx) and bending moment (Mx) at any distance (x) from the
support are given by:
Vx = w(0.5L x)
(Eq. 9.4.4.1.2-1)
Mx = 0.5wx(L x)
(Eq. 9.4.4.1.2-2)
Using the above equations, values of shear forces and bending moments for a typical
interior beam, under self-weight of beam, weight of slab and haunch, weight of barriers and future wearing surface are computed and shown in Table 9.4.4-1. For these
calculations, the span length (L) is the design span, 120 ft. However, for calculations
of stresses and deformation at the time prestress is released, the overall length of the
precast member, 121 ft, is used as illustrated later in this example.
9.4.4.2
Shear Forces and Bending
Moments Due to Live Loads
9.4.4.2.1
Live Loads
Design live load is HL-93 which consists of a combination of: [LRFD Art. 3.6.1.2.1]
1. Design truck or design tandem with dynamic allowance
[LRFD Art. 3.6.1.2.2]
The design truck is the same as the HS20 design truck specified by the Standard
Specifications, [STD Art. 3.6.1.2.2]. The design tandem consists of a pair of 25.0kip axles spaced at 4.0 ft apart.
[LRFD Art. 3.6.1.2.3]
2. Design lane load of 0.64 kip/ft without dynamic allowance [LRFD Art. 3.6.1.2.4]
9.4.4.2.2
Live Load Distribution Factor
for Typical Interior Beam
The live load bending moments and shear forces are determined by using the simplified distribution factor formulas, [LRFD Art. 4.6.2.2]. To use the simplified live load
distribution factor formulas, the following conditions must be met:
[LRFD Art.
4.6.2.2.1]
Width of slab is constant O.K.
Number of beams, Nb 4 (Nb = 6) O.K.
Beams are parallel and of the same stiffness O.K.
The roadway part of the overhang, de 3.0 ft (d e = 1.5 ft)
O.K.
O.K.
JUL 03
10
8/15/03, 9:40 AM
9.4.4.2.2 Live Load Distribution Factor for Typical Interior Beam/9.4.4.2.2.1 Distribution Factor for Bending Moment
For precast concrete I- or bulb-tee beams with cast-in-place concrete deck, the bridge
type is (k).
[LRFD Table 4.6.2.2.1-1]
The number of design lanes is computed as:
Number of design lanes = the integer part of the ratio of (w/12), where (w) is the clear
roadway width, in ft, between the curbs [LRFD Art. 3.6.1.1.1]
From Figure 9.4.1-1, w = 48 ft
Number of design lanes = integer part of (48/12 ) = 4 lanes
9.4.4.2.2.1
Distribution Factor for
Bending Moment
0.6
120
0.2
2, 233, 257.6
12.0(120)(7.5) 3
0.1
0.4
120
0.3
2, 233, 257
12.0(120)(7.5) 3
0.1
= 0.499 lanes/beam
JUL 03
11
8/15/03, 9:40 AM
Thus, the case of two or more lanes loaded controls and DFM = 0.732 lanes/beam.
For fatigue limit state:
The LRFD Specifications, Art. 3.4.1, states that for fatigue limit state, a single design truck
should be used. However, live load distribution factors given in LRFD Article 4.6.2.2
take into consideration the multiple presence factor, m. LRFD Article 3.6.1.1.2 states
that the multiple presence factor, m, for one design lane loaded is 1.2. Therefore, the
distribution factor for one design lane loaded with the multiple presence factor removed,
should be used. The distribution factor for fatigue limit state is: 0.499/1.2 = 0.416
lanes/beam.
9.4.4.2.2.2
Distribution Factor
for Shear Force
= 0.884 lanes/beam
IM = 33%
[LRFD Table 3.6.2.1-1]
where IM = dynamic load allowance, applied to truck load only
JUL 03
12
8/15/03, 9:40 AM
9.4.4.2.4 Unfactored Shear Forces and Bending Moments/9.4.4.2.4.2 Due To Design Lane Load; VLL And MLL
9.4.4.2.4
Unfactored Shear Forces and
Bending Moments
9.4.4.2.4.1
Due To Truck Load;
VLT and MLT
9.4.4.2.4.2
Due To Design
Lane Load; VLL And MLL
To obtain the maximum shear force at a section located at a distance (x) from the left
support under a uniformly distributed load of 0.64 kip/ft, load the member to the
right of section under consideration as shown in Figure 9.4.4.2.4.2-1. Therefore, the
maximum shear force per lane is:
Vx =
0.32(L x) 2
for x 0.5L
L
(Eq. 9.4.4.2.4.2-1)
0.64 kip/ft/lane
left reaction
right reaction
(120 x) > x
x
120'
JUL 03
13
8/15/03, 9:40 AM
9.4.4.2.4.2 Due To Design Lane Load; VLL And MLL/9.4.4.3 Load Combinations
To calculate the maximum bending moment at any section, use Eq. (9.4.4.1.2-2).
Lane load shear force and bending moment per typical interior beam are as follows:
VLL = (lane load shear force)(DFV)
= (lane load shear force)(0.884) kips
For all limit states except for fatigue limit state:
MLL = (lane load bending moment)(DFM)
= (lane load bending moment)(0.732) ft-kips
Note that the dynamic allowance is not applied to the design lane loading.
Values of shear forces and bending moments, VLL and MLL, are given in Table 9.4.4-1.
9.4.4.3
Load Combinations
where
= a factor relating to ductility, redundancy and
[LRFD Art. 1.3.2]
operational importance (Here, is considered to be 1.0)
i = load factors
[LRFD Table 3.4.1-1]
qi = specified loads
Investigating different limit states given in LRFD Article 3.4.1, the following limit
states are applicable:
Service I: check compressive stresses in prestressed concrete components:
Q = 1.00(DC + DW) + 1.00(LL + IM)
[LRFD Table 3.4.1-1]
This load combination is the general combination for service limit state stress checks
and applies to all conditions other than Service III.
Service III: check tensile stresses in prestressed concrete components:
Q = 1.00(DC + DW) + 0.80(LL + IM)
[LRFD Table 3.4.1-1]
This load combination is a special combination for service limit state stress checks
that applies only to tension in prestressed concrete structures to control cracks.
Strength I: check ultimate strength:
[LRFD Tables 3.4.1-1 and 2]
Maximum Q = 1.25(DC) + 1.50(DW) + 1.75(LL + IM)
Minimum Q = 0.90(DC) + 0.65(DW) + 1.75(LL + IM)
This load combination is the general load combination for strength limit state
design.
Note: For simple-span bridges, the maximum load factors produce maximum effects.
However, use minimum load factors for dead load (DC), and wearing surface (DW)
when dead load and wearing surface stresses are opposite to those of live load.
Fatigue: check stress range in strands:
[LRFD Table 3.4.1-1]
Q = 0.75(LL + IM)
This load combination is a special load combination to check the tensile stress range
in the strands due to live load and dynamic allowance.
JUL 03
14
8/15/03, 9:40 AM
Table 9.4.4-1
Unfactored Shear Forces and Bending Moments for a Typical Interior Beam
Beam weight
Distance
x
Section
x/L
Shear
Moment
Mg
kips
ft-kips
ft
0
0.0
47.9
0.0
*7.18
0.06
42.2
323.6
12
0.1
38.4
517.8
24
0.2
28.8
920.4
36
0.3
19.2
1,208.1
48
0.4
9.6
1,380.7
60
0.5
0.0
1,438.2
* Critical section for shear (see Section 9.4.11)
Truck load with
impact
Shear
Moment
V LT
MLT
kips
ft-kips
ft
78.1
0.0
0
0.0
72.9
433.9
*7.18
0.06
69.6
691.6
12
0.1
61.1
1,215.0
24
0.2
52.7
1,570.2
36
0.3
44.2
1,778.9
48
0.4
35.7
1,830.2
60
0.5
* Critical section for shear (see Section 9.4.11)
Distance
x
Section
x/L
(Slab+Haunch)
weight
Shear
Moment
Ms
kips
ft-kips
55.3
0.0
48.7
373.3
44.3
597.5
33.2
1,062.1
22.1
1,394.1
11.1
1,593.2
0.0
1,659.6
Lane load
Shear
V LL
kips
33.9
30.0
27.5
21.7
16.6
12.2
8.5
Moment
MLL
ft-kips
0.0
189.7
303.6
539.7
708.3
809.5
843.3
Barrier weight
Shear
kips
6.0
5.3
4.8
3.6
2.4
1.2
0.0
Moment
Mb
ft-kips
0.0
40.5
64.8
115.2
151.2
172.8
180.0
Wearing surface
Shear
kips
12.0
10.6
9.6
7.2
4.8
2.4
0.0
Moment
M ws
ft-kips
0.0
81.0
129.6
230.4
302.4
345.6
360.0
Fatigue truck
with impact
Moment
Mf
ft-kips
0.0
165.0
309.2
535.8
692.7
776.2
776.9
9.4.5
ESTIMATE REQUIRED
PRESTRESS
The required number of strands is usually governed by concrete tensile stresses at the
bottom fiber for load combination at Service III at the section of maximum moment
or at the harp points. For estimating the number of strands, only the stresses at midspan are considered.
9.4.5.1
Service Load Stresses
at Midspan
Bottom tensile stress due to applied dead and live loads using load combination
Service III is:
fb =
Mg + Ms
Sb
M b + M ws + (0.8)(M LT + M LL )
S bc
where
fb = bottom tensile stress, ksi
Mg = unfactored bending moment due to beam self-weight, ft-kips
Ms = unfactored bending moment due to slab and haunch weights, ft-kips
Mb = unfactored bending moment due to barrier weight, ft-kips
Mws = unfactored bending moment due to future wearing surface, ft-kips
MLT = unfactored bending moment due to truck load, ft-kips
MLL = unfactored bending moment due to lane load, ft-kips
Using values of bending moments from Table 9.4.4-1, bottom tensile stress at midspan
is:
JUL 03
15
8/15/03, 9:40 AM
fbc =
9.4.5.3
Required Number
of Strands
The required precompressive stress at the bottom fiber of the beam is the difference
between bottom tensile stress due to the applied loads and the concrete tensile stress
limit:
fpb = (4.092 0.484) = 3.608 ksi
The location of the strand center of gravity at midspan, ranges from 5 to 15% of the
beam depth, measured from the bottom of the beam. A value of 5% is appropriate for
newer efficient sections like the bulb-tee beams and 15% for less efficient AASHTO
standard shapes.
Assume the distance between the center of gravity of bottom strands and the bottom
fiber of the beam:
ybs = 0.05h = 0.05(72) = 3.60 in., use ybs = 4.0 in.
Therefore, strand eccentricity at midspan, ec = (yb ybs) = (36.6 4.0) = 32.6 in.
If Ppe is the total prestressing force, the stress at the bottom fiber due to prestress is:
Ppe Ppe (32.6)
P e
P
+
fpb = pe + pe c or, 3.608 =
767
14,915
A
Sb ,
Solving for Ppe, the required Ppe = 1,034.4 kips.
Final prestress force per strand = (area of strand)(fpi)(1 losses, %)
where fpi = initial stress before transfer, ksi (see Section 9.4.2) = 202.5 ksi
Assuming final loss of 25% of fpi, the prestress force per strand after all losses
= (0.153)(202.5)(1 0.25) = 23.2 kips
Number of strands required = (1,034.4/23.2) = 44.6 strands
As an initial trial, (46) 1/2 in., 270 ksi strands were selected. The center of gravity of the 46
strands at midspan is 6.35 in. from the bottom of the concrete, which is higher than the
assumed value, 4.0 in. Thus, a second iteration using the new value of strand eccentricity
indicates that 48 strands are required. The strand pattern at midspan for the 48 strands
is shown in Figure 9.4.5.3-1. Each available position is filled beginning with the bottom
row.
9.4.5.4
Strand Pattern
The distance between the center of gravity of bottom strands and the bottom concrete fiber of the beam is:
ybs = [12(2) + 12(4) + 8(6) + 4(8) + 2(10) + 2(12) + 2(14) + 2(16) + 2(18) + 2(20)]/(48)
= 6.92 in.
Strand eccentricity at midspan, ec = yb ybs = 36.60 6.92 = 29.68 in.
JUL 03
16
8/15/03, 9:40 AM
Figure 9.4.5.3-1
Assumed Strand Pattern
at Midspan
No.
Strands
2
2
2
2
2
2
4
8
12
12
2"
9.4.6
PRESTRESS LOSSES
9.4.6.1
Elastic Shortening
11 spaces
@ 2"
2"
Ep
E ci
Distance from
bottom (in.)
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
f cgp
where
Ep = modulus of elasticity of prestressing reinforcement = 28,500 ksi
Eci = modulus of elasticity of beam at release = 4,617 ksi
fcgp = sum of concrete stresses at the center of gravity of prestressing tendons due
to prestressing force at transfer and the self-weight of the member at sections of maximum moment.
Force per strand at transfer = (area of strand)(prestress stress at transfer)
JUL 03
17
8/15/03, 9:40 AM
LRFD Article 5.9.5.2.3a states that fcgp can be calculated on the basis of prestressing steel
stress assumed to be 0.7fpu for low-relaxation strands. However, common practice assumes
the initial losses as a percentage of initial prestressing stress before release, fpi. In both procedures, assumed initial losses should be checked and if different from the assumed value,
a second iteration should be carried out. In this example, 9% fpi initial loss is used.
Force per strand at transfer = (0.153)(202.5)(1 0.09) = 28.2 kips
fcgp =
2
M ge c
Pi Pe
+ i c
A
I
I
where
ec = eccentricity of strands measured from the center of gravity of the precast
beam at midspan
Pi = total prestressing force at release = (48 strands)(28.2) = 1,353.6 kips
Mg should be calculated based on the overall beam length of 121 ft. Since
the elastic shortening loss is a part of the total loss, fcgp will be conservatively
computed based on Mg using the design span length of 120 ft.
fcgp =
767
545,894
545,894
18.6
(100) = 9.2%
202.5
Since the calculated loss of 9.2% is approximately equal to the initial loss assumption of
9%, a second iteration is not necessary. Note that this loss is equivalent to a stress after
initial losses of 0.68 fpu. This stress is lower than the estimate of 0.70 fpu, provided in Article
5.9.5.2.3a. If the elastic shortening loss was calculated using a stress of 0.70 fpu, a second
iteration would be required to arrive at a steel stress of 0.68 fpu.
9.4.6.2
Shrinkage
9.4.6.3
Creep of Concrete
fpCR
JUL 03
18
8/15/03, 9:40 AM
9.4.6.4
Relaxation of
Prestressing Strands
9.4.6.4.1
Relaxation before Transfer
Initial loss due to relaxation of prestressing steel is accounted for in the beam fabrication process. Therefore, loss due to relaxation of the prestressing steel prior to transfer is not be computed, i.e. fpR1 = 0. Recognizing this for pretensioned members,
LRFD Article 5.9.5.1 allows the portion of the relaxation loss that occurs prior to
transfer to be neglected in computing the final loss.
9.4.6.4.2
Relaxation after Transfer
For low-relaxation strands, loss due to relaxation after transfer: [LRFD Art. 5.9.5.4.4c]
fpR2 = 30%[20.0 0.4fpES 0.2(fpSR + fpCR)]
[LRFD Art. 5.9.5.4.4c-1]
= 0.3[20.0 0.4(18.6) 0.2(6.5 + 26.6)] = 1.8 ksi
9.4.6.5
Total Losses at Transfer
9.4.6.6
Total Losses at
Service Loads
9.4.7
STRESSES AT
TRANSFER
9.4.7.1
Stress Limits for Concrete
JUL 03
19
8/15/03, 9:40 AM
with bonded auxiliary reinforcement which is sufficient to resist 120% of the tension force in the cracked concrete
0.22 f ci = 0.22 5.8 = 0.530 ksi
9.4.7.2
Stresses at Transfer
Length Section
Stresses at this location need only be checked at release since this stage almost always governs. Also, losses with time will reduce the concrete stresses making them less critical.
Transfer length = 60(strand diameter) = 60(0.5) = 30 in. = 2.5 ft [LRFD Art.
5.8.2.3]
Due to camber of the beam at release, the beam self-weight acts on the overall beam
length, 121 ft. Therefore, values for bending moment given in Table 9.4.4-1 cannot
be used because they are based on the design span of 120 ft. Using statics, bending
moment at transfer length due to beam self-weight is:
0.5wx(L x) = (0.5)(0.799)(2.5)(121 2.5) = 118.4 ft-kips
Compute stress in the top of beam:
P Pe M
1,348.8 (1,348.8)(29.68) (118.4)(12)
ft = i i + g =
+
A St
St
767
15, 421
15, 421
= 1.759 2.605 + 0.092 = 0.754 ksi
Tensile stress limit for concrete with bonded reinforcement: 0.530 ksi
Compute stress in the bottom of beam:
P Pe M
1,348.8 (1,348.8)(29.68) (118.4)(12)
fb = i + i g =
+
A Sb
Sb
767
14,915
14,915
N.G.
Harped
strands
2"
No.
Distance from
Strands bottom (in.)
70
2
68
2
66
2
64
2
62
2
60
2
11 spac.
@ 2"
At midspan
2"
2"
11 spac.
@ 2"
No.
Strands
4
8
12
12
2"
Distance from
bottom (in.)
8
6
4
2
At ends
JUL 03
20
8/15/03, 9:40 AM
Figure 9.4.7.2-2
Longitudinal Strand Profile
36 strands
12 strands
7"
65"
4.22"
2'-6"
48'-6"
15"
12'-0"
C
L Beam
Compute the center of gravity of the prestressing strands at the transfer length section
using the harped pattern.
The distance between the center of gravity of the 12 harped strands at the end of the
beam and the top fiber of the precast beam is:
2(2) + 2(4) + 2(6) + 2(8) + 2(10) + 2(12)
= 7.0 in.
12
The distance between the center of gravity of the 12 harped stands at the harp point
and the bottom fiber of the beam is:
2(10) + 2(12) + 2(14) + 2(16) + 2(18) + 2(20)
= 15.0 in.
12
The distance between the center of gravity of the 12 harped strands and the top fiber
of the beam at the transfer length section:
7 in. +
(72 15 7) in.
(2.5 ft) = 9.58 in.
48.5 ft
The distance between the center of gravity of the bottom straight 36 strands and the
extreme bottom fiber of the beam is:
12(2) + 12(4) + 8(6) + 4(8)
= 4.22 in.
36
Therefore, the distance between the center of gravity of the total number of strands
measured to the bottom of the precast beam at transfer length:
36(4.22) + 12(72 9.58)
= 18.77 in.
48
Eccentricity of the strand group at transfer length, e, is: 36.6 18.77 = 17.83 in.
The center of gravity of all prestressing strand with respect to the extreme bottom
fiber at the end of the beam, ybs, is:
(36)(4.22) + 12(72 7)
= 19.42 in.
48
Recompute the stresses at the transfer length section with harped strands:
Concrete stress in top of beam:
ft =
+
767
15, 421
15, 421
O.K.
JUL 03
21
8/15/03, 9:41 AM
767
14,915
14,915
The strand eccentricity at the harp points is the same as at midspan, ec = 29.68 in.
Bending moment at the harp points (0.4L) due to the self-weight of the beam is:
(0.5)(0.799)(48.5)(121 48.5) = 1,404.7 ft-kips.
Therefore, top and bottom stresses are:
Concrete stress in top of beam:
ft =
+
767
15, 421
15, 421
767
14,915
14,915
+
767
15, 421
15, 421
767
14,915
14,915
Assume that the stress in the strand at the time of prestressing, before seating losses, is:
0.80 fpu = 0.80(270) = 216 ksi
Thus, the prestress force per strand before seating losses is: 0.153(216) = 33.0 kips
From Figure 9.4.7.2-2, the harp angle,
50
= tan-1
= 4.91
48.5(12)
JUL 03
22
8/15/03, 9:41 AM
9.4.8
STRESSES AT
SERVICE LOADS
9.4.8.1
Stress Limits For Concrete
Top Stresses
ft (ksi)
+0.291
+0.256
+0.301
Bottom Stresses
fb (ksi)
+3.276
+3.313
+3.266
The total prestressing force after all losses, Ppe = 1,094.4 kips
9.4.8.2
Stresses at Midspan
Ppe
A
Ppee c
St
(M g + M s )
St
(M ws + M b )
S tg
JUL 03
23
8/15/03, 9:41 AM
+
+
767
15, 421
15, 421
63,861
(1,830.3 + 843.3)(12)
63,861
O.K.
(360 + 180)(12)
M ws + M b
=
= +0.117 ksi
55,592
S tc
O.K.
A
Sb
Sb
S bc
=
1,094.4 (1,094.4)(29.68)
+
767
14,915
14,915
20,090
LRFD Article 5.5.3.1 states that in regions of compressive stress due to permanent
loads and prestress, fatigue is considered only if the compressive stress is less than
twice the maximum tensile live load stress resulting from the fatigue load combination. However, the LRFD Specifications do not state where this stress is computed: at the bottom fiber of concrete or at the lower strand level. In this example,
JUL 03
24
8/15/03, 9:41 AM
for convenience, the calculations are done at the bottom fiber of concrete.
At midspan, the bottom compressive stress due to permanent loads and prestress is:
Ppe Ppee c (M g + M s ) (M ws + M b )
+
A
Sb
Sb
S bc
1,094.4 (1,094.4)(29.68) (1, 438.2 + 1,659.6) (360.0 + 180.0)
+
14,915
14,915
20,090
= 767
= 1.427 + 2.178 2.492 0.323 = +0.790 ksi
From Table 9.4.4-1, the unfactored fatigue bending moment at midspan, Mf, is
776.9 ft-kips. Thus, stress at the bottom fiber of the beam due to fatigue load combination is:
0.75(Mf )
0.75 (776.9)(12)
=
= 0.348 ksi
Sbc
20,090
Since 2 (0.348) = 0.696 ksi < 0.790 ksi, the fatigue check does not need to be performed. See Discussion in Section 9.2.9.3 in Example 9.2.
9.4.8.4
Summary of Stresses at
Service Loads
At midspan
9.4.9
STRENGTH LIMIT STATE
Bottom of
Beam (ksi)
Service III
0.487
c
fps = fpu 1 k
[LRFD Eq. 5.7.3.1.1-1]
dp
where
fps = average stress in prestressing steel
fpu = specified tensile strength of prestressing steel = 270 ksi
f
k = 2 1.04 py
[LRFD Eq. 5.7.3.1.1-2]
f pu
JUL 03
25
8/15/03, 9:41 AM
A psf pu + A sf y A sf y
f pu
0.85f c1 b + kA ps
dp
where
Aps = area of prestressing steel = 48(0.153) = 7.344 in.2
As = area of mild steel tension reinforcement = 0 in.2
As = area of compression reinforcement = 0 in.2
f c = compressive stress of deck concrete = 4.0 ksi
fy = yield strength of tension reinforcement, ksi
f y = yield strength of compression reinforcement, ksi
1 = stress factor of compression block
[LRFD Art. 5.7.2.2]
7.344(270) + 0 0
270
0.85(4.0)(0.85)(108) + 0.28(7.344)
73.08
O.K.
6.20
fps = 270 1 0.28
= 263.6 ksi
73.08
Nominal flexural resistance:
[LRFD Art. 5.7.3.2.3]
a
Mn = Apsfps d p
[LRFD Eq. 5.7.3.2.2-1]
2
The above equation is a simplified form of LRFD Equation 5.7.3.2.2-1 because no
compression reinforcement or mild tension reinforcement is considered and the section behaves as a rectangular section.
5.27
Mn = (7.344)(263.6) 73.08
/12 = 11,364.4 ft-kips
2
Factored flexural resistance:
JUL 03
26
8/15/03, 9:41 AM
Mr = Mn
[LRFD Eq. 5.7.3.2.1-1]
where
= resistance factor
[LRFD Art. 5.5.4.2.1]
= 1.00, for flexure and tension of prestressed concrete
Mr = 11,364.4 ft-kips > Mu = 9,316.1 ft-kips O.K.
9.4.10
LIMITS OF
REINFORCEMENT
9.4.10.1
Maximum Reinforcement
A ps fps d p + A s fy d s
A ps fps + A s fy
Ppee c
1,094.4 1,094.4(29.68)
= 3.605 ksi
+
A
Sb
767
14,915
Md/nc = non-composite dead load moment at the section
= Mg + Ms = 1,438.2 + 1,659.6 = 3,097.8 ft-kips
Sbc = composite section modulus for the extreme fiber of section where the
tensile stress is caused by externally applied loads = 20,090 in.4
Sb = non-composite section modulus for the extreme fiber of section where
=
JUL 03
27
8/15/03, 9:41 AM
The area and spacing of shear reinforcement must be determined at regular intervals
along the entire length of the beam. In this design example, transverse shear design
procedures are demonstrated below by determining these values at the critical section
near the supports.
Transverse shear reinforcement is provided when:
Vu > 0.5(Vc + Vp)
[LRFD Eq. 5.8.2.4-1]
where
Vu = total factored shear force, kips
Vc = shear strength provided by concrete, kips
Vp = component of the effective prestressing force in the direction of the applied
shear, kips
= resistance factor = 0.9
[LRFD Art. 5.5.4.2.1]
9.4.11.1
Critical Section
JUL 03
28
8/15/03, 9:41 AM
9.4.11.1.1
Angle of Diagonal
Compressive Stresses
The shear design at any section depends on the angle of diagonal compressive stresses
at the section. Shear design is an iterative process that begins with assuming a value
for . For this example, only the final cycle of calculations is shown. As a guide, for
areas which have high shear forces and low bending moments, the angle ranges
from 20 to 30. For areas of low shear forces and high bending moments, the angle
ranges to 45. Using the previously stated guidelines, two iterations are enough in
most cases.
9.4.11.1.2
Effective Shear Depth
Since some of the strands are harped, the effective depth, de, varies from point-topoint. However, de must be calculated at the critical section in shear which is not yet
determined; therefore, for the first iteration, de is calculated based on the center of
gravity of the strand group at the end of the beam, ybs.
de = hc ybs = 80.0 4.22 = 75.78 in.
dv = 75.78 (0.5)(5.27) = 73.14 in.
0.9 de = 0.9(75.78) = 68.20 in.
0.72 h = 0.72(80) = 57.60 in. O.K.
Therefore, dv = 73.14 in.
9.4.11.1.3
Calculation of Critical Section
9.4.11.2
Contribution of Concrete to
Nominal Shear Resistance
9.4.11.2.1
Strain in Flexural Tension
Reinforcement
Vc = 0.0316 f c bvdv
[LRFD Eq. 5.8.3.3-3]
Several quantities must be determined before this expression can be evaluated.
Calculate the strain in the reinforcement, x:
Mu
+ 0.5Nu + 0.5(Vu Vp )cot A ps f po
dv
x =
0.001
2(E s A s + E p A ps )
where
Mu = applied factored bending moment at the specified section, 0.05L
= 1.25(323.6 + 373.3 + 40.5) + 1.50(81.0) + 1.75(433.9 + 189.7)
= 2,134.0 ft-kips
Vu = applied factored shear force at the specified section, 0.05L
JUL 03
29
8/15/03, 9:41 AM
2,134.0(12)
+ 0 + 0.5(316.2 23.4)(cot23) 5.508(202.5)
420.3
73.14
=
2[0 + 28,500(5.508)]
313, 956
= 1.339 x 10 - 3
9.4.11.2.1.1
Calculation for
Negative Strain
Figure 9.4.11-1
Illustration of Ac
8"
6'-0"
h/2
420.3
= 0.098 x 10-3
2[(4,888)(405) + 0 + (28,500)(5.508)]
vu =
Vu Vp
b v d v
where
vu = shear stress in concrete
= resistance factor = 0.9
30
8/15/03, 9:41 AM
316.2 (0.9)(23.4)
= 0.7473 ksi
(0.9)(6)(73.14)
Having computed x and vu/f c, find a better estimate of from LRFD Table
5.8.3.4.2-1. Since the computed value of vu/f c is likely to fall between two rows in
the table, a linear interpolation may be performed. However, for hand calculations,
interpolation is not recommended (LRFD Art. C5.8.3.4.2). The values of in the
lower row that bounds the computed value may be used. Similarly, the values of in
the first column to the right of the computed value may be used. For this example,
the applicable row and column are the ones labeled 0.125 and 0.05, respectively. The values of and contained in the cell of intersection of that row and
column are:
= 22.8 assumed value of 23 O.K.
Therefore, no further iteration is needed. However, if the designer desires to go
through further iteration, it should be kept in mind that the position of the critical
section of shear, and consequently the values of Vu and Mu, will need to be based on
the new value of , 22.8.
= 2.94
where = a factor indicating the ability of diagonally cracked concrete to transmit
tension (a value indicating concrete contribution).
9.4.11.2.3
Compute Concrete
Contribution
9.4.11.3.2
Required Area of
Reinforcement
Vu / Vn = Vc + Vs + Vp
[LRFD Eq. 5.8.3.3-1]
where
Vs = shear force carried by transverse reinforcement
= (Vu/) Vc Vp = (316.2/0.9) 103.9 23.4 = 188.9 kips
Vs =
JUL 03
31
8/15/03, 9:41 AM
where
Av
s
fy
Use # 4 bar double legs @ 12 in., Av = 0.40 in.2/ft > 0.22 in.2/ft.
Vs =
9.4.11.3.4
Minimum Reinforcement
Requirement
9.4.11.4
Maximum Nominal Shear
Resistance
0.4(60)73.14cot23
= 344.6 kips
12
(6)(12)
b vs
= 0.0316 6.5
= 0.10 in.2/ft < Av provided
60
fy
O.K.
In order to ensure that the concrete in the web of the beam will not crush prior to
yielding of the transverse reinforcement, the LRFD Specifications give an upper limit
of Vn as follows:
Vn = 0.25f cbvdv + Vp
[LRFD Eq. 5.8.3.3-2]
Comparing this equation with Eq. 5.8.3.3-1, it can be concluded that
Vc + Vs 0.25f cbvdv
103.9 + 344.6 = 448.5 kips 0.25(6.5)(6)(73.14) = 713.1 kips O.K.
Using the foregoing procedures, the transverse reinforcement can be determined at
increments along the entire length of the beam.
JUL 03
32
8/15/03, 9:41 AM
9.4.12
INTERFACE SHEAR
TRANSFER
9.4.12.1
Factored Horizontal Shear
9.4.12.2
Required Nominal
Resistance
9.4.12.3
Required Interface Shear
Reinforcement
where
c = cohesion factor, ksi
[LRFD Art. 5.8.4.2]
= friction factor
[LRFD Art. 5.8.4.2]
2
Acv = area of concrete engaged in shear transfer, in.
Avf = area of shear reinforcement crossing the shear plane, in.2
Pc = permanent net compressive force normal to the shear plane, kips
fy = shear reinforcement yield strength, ksi
For concrete placed against clean, hardened concrete but not an intentionally
roughened surface:
[LRFD Art. 5.8.4.2]
JUL 03
33
8/15/03, 9:41 AM
c = 0.075 ksi
= 0.6, where =1.0 for normal weight concrete, and therefore,
= 0.6
The actual contact width, bv, between the slab and the beam is 42 in.
Acv = (42.0 in.)(1.0 in.) = 42.0 in.2
LRFD Eq. 5.8.4.1-1 can be solved for Avf as follows:
3.08 = (0.075 x 42.0) + 0.6[Avf (60) + 0]
solving for Avf,
Avf (reqd) < 0
Since the resistance provided by cohesion is higher than the applied force, provide the
minimum required interface reinforcement.
9.4.12.3.1
Minimum Interface Shear
Reinforcement
9.4.12.4
Maximum Nominal Shear
Resistance
9.4.13
MINIMUM LONGITUDINAL
REINFORCEMENT
REQUIREMENT
0.40
Mu
N
+ 0.5 u + u 0.5Vs Vp cot
d v
where
As = area of nonprestressed tension reinforcement, in.2
fy = specified minimum yield strength of reinforcing bars, ksi
Aps = area of prestressing steel at the tension side of the section, in.2
fps = average stress in prestressing steel at the time for which the nominal resistance
is required, ksi
JUL 03
34
8/15/03, 9:41 AM
9.4.13.1
Required Reinforcement at
Face of Bearing
Mu
N
+ 0.5 u + u 0.5Vs Vp cot
d v
350.5
As shown in Figure 9.4.13.1-1, the assumed crack plane crosses the centroid of the
36-straight strands at a distance of (6 + 4.22cot 23 = 15.94 in.) from the end of
the beam. Since the transfer length is 30 in. from the end of the beam (60 times the
strand diameter), the available prestress from the 36-straight strands is a fraction of
the effective prestress, fpe, in these strands. The 12 harped strands do not contribute
to the tensile capacity since they are not on the flexural tension side of the member.
Therefore, the available prestress force is:
15.94
Asfy + Apsfps = 0 + [(36)(0.153) (149.0)
30
= 0 + 436.1 = 436.1 kips
Additional force required:
(456.4 436.1)/60.0 = 0.34 in.2
Provide (2)#4 bars (0.40 in.2)
JUL 03
35
8/15/03, 9:42 AM
9.4.13.1 Required Reinforcement at Face of Bearing/9.4.15.1 Deflection Due to Prestressing Force at Transfer
Figure 9.4.13.1-1
Assumed Failure Crack
ybc
ybc cot
6"
CL Bearing
9.4.14
PRETENSIONED
ANCHORAGE ZONE
9.4.14.1
Anchorage Zone
Reinforcement
9.4.14.2
Confinement
Reinforcement
9.4.15
DEFLECTION AND
CAMBER
9.4.15.1
Deflection Due
to Prestressing Force
at Transfer
36
8/15/03, 9:42 AM
9.4.15.1 Deflection Due to Prestressing Force at Transfer/9.4.15.3 Deflection Due to Slab and Haunch Weights
where
Pi = total prestressing force after transfer = 48 x 28.1 = 1,348.8 kips
ec = eccentricity of prestressing force at midspan = 29.68 in.
e = difference between eccentricity of prestressing steel at midspan and at end
of the beam
= ec ee = 29.68 (36.6 19.42) = 12.50 in.
a = distance from end of the beam to the harp point = 48.5 ft
L = overall beam length = 121.0 ft
Eci = modulus of elasticity at transfer = 4,617 ksi
I = gross moment of inertia of the precast beam = 545,894 in.4
9.4.15.2
Deflection Due to
Beam Self-Weight
p =
= 3.81 in.
(4,617)(545,894)
8
6
g =
5wL4
384E ciI
where
w = beam self-weight = 0.799 kip/ft
Eci = modulus of elasticity of precast beam at transfer = 4,617 ksi
I = gross moment of inertia of the precast beam = 545,894 in.4
L = beam length = 121.0 ft at transfer = 120.0 ft at erection
Deflection due to beam self-weight at transfer:
0.799
4
5
(121 x 12)
12
g =
= 1.53 in.
(384)(4,617)(545,894)
Deflection due to beam self-weight used to compute deflection at erection:
0.799
4
5
(121 x 12)
12
g =
= 1.48 in.
(384)(4,617)(545,894)
9.4.15.3
Deflection Due to Slab and
Haunch Weights
5wL4
s =
384E cI
where
w
L
Ec
I
0.922
4
5
(120 x 12)
12
s =
= 1.61 in.
(384)(4,888)(545,894)
JUL 03
37
8/15/03, 9:42 AM
9.4.15.4 Deflection Due to Barrier and Future Wearing Surface/9.4.15.6 Deflection Due to Live Load and Impact
9.4.15.4
Deflection Due to Barrier
and Future Wearing
Surface
b+ws =
5wL4
384E cI c
where
w = barrier and future wearing surface weight = 0.300 kip/ft
L = design span = 120.0 ft
Ec = modulus of elasticity of precast beam at service loads = 4,888 ksi
Ic = gross moment of inertia of the composite section = 1,073,931 in.4
0.300
4
(5)
(120 x 12)
12
b+ws =
= 0.26 in.
(384)(4,888)(1,100,320)
9.4.15.5
Deflection and
Camber Summary
9.4.15.6
Deflection Due to
Live Load and Impact
12
= 120 x
= 1.80 in.
800
If the owner invokes the optional live load deflection criteria specified in Art.
2.5.2.6.2, the deflection is the greater of:
that resulting from the design truck alone, or
that resulting from 25% of the design truck taken together with the design lane load.
The LRFD Specifications state that all the beams should be assumed to deflect equally
under the applied live load and impact.
[LRFD Art. 2.5.2.6.2]
Therefore, the distribution factor for deflection, DFD, is calculated as follows:
DFD = (number of lanes/number of beams)
[LRFD Art. C2.5.2.6.2]
= 4/7 = 0.571 lanes/beam
However, it is more conservative to use the distribution factor for moment, DFM.
Deflection due to lane load
Design lane load, w = 0.64DFM = 0.64(0.732) = 0.469 kips/ft/beam
0.469
4
5
(120 x 12)
4
5wL
12
LL =
=
= 0.41 in.
384E cI
(384)(4,888)(1,100,320)
JUL 03
38
8/15/03, 9:42 AM
32 kips
8 kips
32 kips
2.333'
37.40 kips
34.60 kips
2.333'
Midspan
48.333'
43.667'
14'
11.667'
120'
Using the elastic moment area or influence lines, deflection at midspan is:
LT = (0.803)(IM)(DFM) = (0.803)(1.33)(0.732) = 0.78 in.
Therefore, live load deflection is the greater of:
LT = 0.78 in. (Controls)
0.25LT + LL = 0.25(0.78) + 0.41 = 0.60 in.
Therefore, live load deflection = 0.78 in. < allowable deflection = 1.8 in.
O.K.
JUL 03
39
8/15/03, 9:42 AM