Professional Documents
Culture Documents
used in several meanings even if they are claimed to be in the first type.
In this article it is tried to study the diffrerent meanings of the word God and
Its Synonyms even if they are used in the first type.
The entire discussion is reduced as follow:=
Other symmatic religions and Unitarian Chriastian sects believe in just one
meaning in the real type and that is of "Supreme Being".
But Trinitarian and Athanasian Christianities believe in more than one
meanings even in the first types.
In this article it is tried to prove the plurality of meanings in the former type
in Trinitarian and Athanasian Sects.
TRINITY
Before attempting to prove this fact it is required to provide a concise and
precise concept of Dogma Of Trinity. With out it the discussion cannot be
understood.
Once it was believed that the Dogma of Trinity is a Mystery but Catholic
theologians did a great job to define and explain this dogma apart from
Orthodox theologians and now it is no longer a Mystery.However it still
requires some time to understand and one has to study the dogma due to the
complex nature of it.
EXPLANATION OF DOGMA OF TRINITY OF GOD
According to the Dogma of Trinity there is Only One Supreme Being, and Only
One Per Se Subsistent Essence / Ousia in the Supreme Being.
But there are three mutually distinct and incommunicable PerSe Subsisntent
Hyppostasis in the Essence /Ousian in the Supreme Being.
The Per Se Subsistent Essence /Ousia in the Supreme Being is Communcable
to each of the stated above Incommunicable Per Se Subsistent Rational
Hypostasis.
The Per Se Subsistent Essence / Ousia in the Supreme Being is identical to
the Beingness [Existence] implies that It Is the very Beingness of the
Supreme Being.
One of the Per Se Subsistent Rational Hypostasis is Unissued is named as
Father, or First Hypostasis.
An other one is issued from the unissued one and is called as Word [Logos] or
Son or the Second Hypostasis. This Hypostasis is issued by the Issuance or
[According to Roman Catholics it is issued from both of the first two and
according to Greek Orthodox it is only issued from the unissued Hypostasis.
Attempts are made to attract both of the two believes close to each other but
their are equal attempts to repel them. It is noted that a Hypostasis is neither
an Essence nor an Attribute. It is not an Essence since it is necessary for a
Hypostasis to exist apart and the Essence/Ousia does not exist apart its
Hypostases.It is not an Atribute since it is necessary for an Arrtibute not to be
Per Se subsistent, and a Hypostasis is Per Se Subsistent.].( 1)
These Per Se Subsistent Hypostases are constituted by four relations.
1)Paternitas,2) Spiratio, 3) Filiatio, and 4) Processio
The Issuance of the Second Per Se Subsistent Hypostasis is called Generation
and the Issuance Third Per Se Subsistent Hypostasis is called Aspiration.
Now we are in a Position to state the different meanings of the words like God
and its Synonyms in Athanasian and Trinitarian Sects.
The words like God, Deity etc. are used in the following meanings.
1] Supreme Being.
These words are used in the meaning of Supreme Being with out any
Implication to Trinity or Not Trinity.
It it just the Supreme Being with perfect silence whether there are more than
one Per Se Subsistent Hypostases in the Per Se Subsistent Essence/ Ousia of
the Supreme Being or there is none or there is only one.
2] Per Se Subsistent Essence/ Ousia.
These words are some time used for the Per Se Subsistent Essence/Ousia of
the Supreme Being. with out any implication whether there are Some Per Se
Subsistent Hypostases in It or Not.
Ousia and Essence are used as Synonyms in Trinitarian and Athanasian
Theology.
This Per Se Subsistent Ousia/ Essence is also called Nature with respects to
acts.
In other words and sentences one may say as follow:
Both the words Essence or Ousia and Nature refer to one and the same
thing. The words Essence and Ousia are used from attributic or static (or
both) point(s) of view and the word Nature is used from active or dynamic (or
both) point(s) of view .
The Per Se Subsistent Essence/Ousia Of Supreme Being is also known as
Godhead and Divinity.
Some time the word Divinity is also used in the meaning of Godhood [State of
Being God] as well.
3] A Per Se Subsistent Rational Hypostasis in the Per Se Subsistent
Ousia/Essence Of Supreme Being.
These words [like God etc.] are used in the meaning of " A Per Se Subsistent
Rational Hypostasis in Per Se Subsistent Essence /Ousia Of Supreme Being.
A Rational Per Se Subsistent Hypostasis is also called a Person. The word
person has some stress on Rational Nature of the Hypostasis then the Per Se
Subsistence Nature of the Hypostasis.
The terms Triune God and God the Trinity are also used for this meaning. In
other words and sentences one can write as follow:These Terms like Triune God etc. are used for the Union of Per Se Subsistent
Essence/Ouisa and the Per Se Subsistent Hypostases ( that is neither for any
Hypostasis in the said Essence/Ouisa nor for the said Ousia but for their
union).
5] A Common Noun for all the stated above meaning.
In this meaning it is certain that the words are used in one of the four stated
above meaning but it is uncertain which one is intended.
These are the five basic meanings in which these words are used by
Athanasian and Trinitarian Sects of Christianity.
The Proof of different meanings of these words stated above.
1] The most famous Sentence of John is:
And the Word [Logos] was God [Theos].
The word God in this sentence can be used in any one of the five meanings.
1] THE PROOF OF THE THIRD MEANING.
If the first of stated above five meanings is taken the meaning becomes as
follow:
And the Word was Supreme Being
This meaning cannot be taken by Athanasians and Trinitarians.
If the second of the stated above meaning is taken the meaning of the verse
becomes as follow:
And the Word was Godhead.
This meaning can also be not taken by them.
If the forth meaning of the word is taken then the meaning of the meaning of
the sentence of Yohonnon becomes as follow:
"And the Word was God (the Trinity)" or "The Word was Triune God".
Once again this meaning cannot be taken.
If the forth meaning is taken then there is an uncertainity in the meaning and
once again one reverts to the position that a quantifier is needed to definitize
the meaning.
Did his audiance got the impact that Iesous claimed to be the Supreme
Being? Since a common Jewish person only know the Word God [Theos] in the
meaning of Supreme Being of Judaism.
If this meaning is accepted then This means what his Jewish audiance
understood : Iesous
claimed to be Supreme Being.
A Jewish Theologian if present in the audiances may also consider that Iesous
claimed to be the Godhead Of God.
If this Trinitarian argment is correct, which is based on the sensibility of the
Jewish Audiances at the time of Iesous, then one is force to conclude that
they used the word God with out any implication to the Hypostases or
Godhead or the Supreme Being etc. This is the fifth meaning.
Otherwise it is concluded that Iesous claimed to be Supreme Being and this
meaning was understood by his Jewish audiances who were present at the
time.
This implies that Iesous is just a Noun for Supreme Being just as IHVH is a
Noun For Supreme Being.
This is very close to Sabellius Trinity:
Sabellius (fl. c. 217c. 220), taught that the Godhead is a God in the
meaning of Supreme Being, and this Supreme Being with respect to different
acts is called with different nouns or epithts. Father with respect to the act of
creation; as Son or Word, in regard to the act of redemption; and as Holy
Spirit, as according to the act of sanctification.
But if this is not the case then this is the proof that Trintarians ascribes the
fifth meaning to the Audiance and hence accept it.
That completes the proof.
7] There is an interesting question which can be asked to any Trinitarian or
Athanasian Sect whether it be Greek Orthodox or Roman Catholics or even
Protestants.
Is Godhead God?.
A question is neither an argument nor a proof but an answer may be either
one of them .
There are three logically possible answers to this question.
The answer is either in affirmation or in negation or neither.
traditions of Non Synoptic Gospel report that Iesous said "I am " Several
times.
As the word "I am " Is a Synonym of God religious termonogy [ not as a literal
synonym] it is used for one of the three mutually distinct Per Se Subsistent
Hypostases in the Divine Essence /Ousia . So Iam is used in the meaning of
the one of the Hypostases in the Ousia.
But the tradition in Hebraic Bible God is reported to say " I Am That I Am".
But this God in Hebraic Bible and LXX [eg see Ex:3:14] is the Supreme Being.
So the compound term "I Am" is used in two diferent meqnings.
1] Hypostasis in the Essence/Ousia Of the Supreme Being.
2] Supreme Being.
As they " I Am" is a compound term for God , plurality of meanings of "I Am"
is equally true for the term God and its synonyms.
Some Trinitarians [ Not All] claim that the Hebraic Biblical " I Am " was the
Hypostasis of Yohonnon. But this is incorrect. The "I Am " Of Hebrew Bible is
the Supreme Being since if if the subject of the cmpound term was the
Hypostasis then this means Bible was misunderstood by each and every
person until it was realised by these Trinitarians that "I Am" is not for the
Supreme Being.
Judaism has always have consider it as Supreme Being and no thing else.
Iesous did not criticise their meaning. So it is an other proof that there are
different meanings meanings of the words like God, Theos , I am etc.
Some Trinitarians believe that every external operation/act of God is due to
the whole Trinity, and cannot be ascribed to any one of the three mutually
Distinct Per Se Subsistent Hypostases . This act of Speaking as it is an
external act and not an immanent act it is the act of the Triune God or God
the Trinity.
Conclusion: it is not the act of any one of the Hypostases even according to
some Trinitarians.
10] A number of Trinitarians(Not All) use the plural forms of some nouns and
pronouns as proof of Dogma Of Trinity.
These are the places where Jewish Bible use plural forms of Nouns and
Pronouns for the Supreme Being or Supreme Person. The Noun Elohem is a
plural form of Eloah meaning Gods , Deities. This is used for the God of
Judaism. Silimarly Jewish Bible reports that God of Judaism whose Proper
==============================================
==============================================
==============================================
===================
(1) Filioque [and the Son] which was added to the Nicene-Constantinopolitan
Creed by the Church of Rome in the 11 AC. This was one of the major
differences caused Great Schism in Trinitarians ,dividing them into two
seperate and ditinct Trinitarian sects. This inclusion in the Creedal article
regarding the Holy Spirit thus states that the Spirit "proceeds from the Father
and the Son." Church of Greace rejects it since its inclusion in the Creed is a
violation of the canons of the Third Ecumenical Council in 431, which forbade
and anathematized (One Of the Great Punishment) any additions to the
Creed. As mensioned in the text of this article may be kept in mind that
Attempts are made to attract both of the two believes close to each other but