18 views

Uploaded by dovi01

AE-May-2015-07-Str-B5

- er56
- A Constitutive Model for Shear Behavior of Rock Joints Based on Three-Dimensional Quantification of Joint Roughness
- drivenpiles.pdf
- Efecto Fuerza axial en Nails
- Flood Resulting for Progresive Breached ARTÍCULO
- Foundation Engg QB1
- 2D and 3D Consolidation - Biot Theory (OCT2011)
- 2008 08 21 Steel Piling Handbook Design Englisch
- The Role of Geotechnical Block Models in Mineral
- FHWA-HRT-05-067
- Group
- Slope Stability Vol2
- Steel Piling Handbook Design
- Rock Cut Slope Design_June 2013
- Slope Paper 145
- Segmental Retaining Wall Design TEK
- 667150900
- Pile Foundation
- Foundation
- DipAnalyst Manual

You are on page 1of 7

07-Str-B5, Foundation Engineering

3 hours duration

NOTES:

1. If doubt exists as to the interpretation of any question, the candidate is urged to

submit with the answer paper, a clear statement of any assumptions made.

2. This is an OPEN BOOK EXAM.

Any non-communicating calculator is permitted.

3. FIVE (5) questions constitute a complete exam paper.

The first five questions as they appear in the answer book will be marked.

4. Each question is of equal value.

5.

Page 2 of 7

May 2015

07-Str-BS -Final Examination

Briefly discuss the following, using diagrams or equations whenever possible:

a. Ultimate limit state and serviceability limit state for shallow foundations. (1.5 marks)

b. Overburden pressure, and distribution of stress increase within the supporting soil due to

a shallow foundation's load. (1.5 marks).

The pier of a highway bridge is to be supported on a square spread footing. The bottom of this

footing will be 1.50 m below the adjacent ground surface. The footing is subjected to Ontario

Highway Bridge Design Code vertical loads as follows: dead load, including the weight of the

foundation, DL = 2500 kN; live load, LL = 1250 kN. The underlying soils are silty sands and

the groundwater table is at a depth of 5.5 m from the ground surface. The soil unit weight above

the water table y = 18.1 kN/m3 and below the water table the saturated unit weight is ysat = 19.81

kN/m3. The representative soil properties obtained from laboratory tests are ~' = 38 and c' = 0

kPa. It is specified that the settlement of the foundation should not exceed 25 mm.

a) Using an overall factor of safety of 3, design the square footing to support the specified

loads. (9 marks)

b) For the estimated drained values of the soil Young's modulus ES = 60 MPa and Poisson's

ratio v = 0.3, check if the foundation designed in section (a) satisfies the serviceability

c) Check if the foundation designed in (a) satisfies the ultimate limit state (bearing resistance)

using limit states design. Use resistance factors f~ = 0.6 and f~ = 0.8, and load factor 1.25 for

DL and 1.5 for LL. Comment on the results. (9 marks)

~y

1.5 cn~

4m

GWT

Figure for Question 1

Page 3 of 7

May 201.5

07-Str-BS -Final Examination

at

A dead load of 7000 kN and a live load of 3000 kN are to be supported on a square pile group

a

in

13m

and

lm

of

depths

between

a depth 1 m below the ground surface. The piles extend

of

piles

concrete

precast

deposit of stiff clay 25 m thick overlying rock. Consider either circular

2.0 m

0.6 m diameter or steel pipe piles of 0.6 m diameter. The recommended pile spacing is

is

level

base

pile

the

at

clay

the

of

centre-to-centre. The representative undrained shear strength

The

kN/m2.

105

175 kN/m2 and the average representative value over the pile length is

t of

following parameters have also been determined for the clay: E = 65 MN/m2; the coefficien

mm.

30

is

t

settlemen

volume compressibility, m,, = 0.07 m2/MN. The allowable

a) Design the pile group using a total (overall) factor of safety = 2.5 and considering short term

conditions. (8 marks)

b) Design the pile group using a total (overall) factor of safety = 2.5 and considering long term

conditions. (8 marks)

c) Check that the bearing resistance limit state is satisfied (use load factors 1.25 for dead load

and 1.5 for live load and resistance factor f~ = 0.7). (7 marks)

d) Check that the serviceability limit state (total settlement) is satisfied (use modified 1-D

theory). (7 marks)

(m)

0

1

-~-~-~- - - -~-~-

Stiffclay

c lave) = 105 kN/mz

y = 18.5 kN/m3

I. = 12 u1

l3

-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~

IHIHIHIHIHI

? x 2.0 m

25

Bedrock

Figure for Question 2

Page 4 of 7

May 2015

07-Str-BS -Final Examination

Part 1

a) State the approximations made in derivations of the ordinary method of slices; Bishop's

simplified method of slices; and Spencer's method. (5 marks)

b) Describe the main mechanisms that may lead to slope failures during an earthquake. (5 marks)

Part 2

A slope 30 m high is to be constructed in a soil of unit weight 19.1 kN/m3. The relevant shear

strength parameters are c' = 36 kN/m2, ~' = 20 and the pore pressure ratio r = 0.25. The slope

angle (3 = 26.

c) Determine the factor of safety of the given slope using Spencer's chart. (10 marks)

d) What is the allowable slope angle if a factor of safety of 1.25 is specified? (10 marks)

H=30m

-- R = 26~ --

Pagc 5 of 7

May 201.5

07-Str-BS -Final Examination

The figure below shows the details of an anchored sheet pile wall. The properties of the backfill

material are ~ = 36, and y = 17 kN/m3. The effective unit weight of the soil below the ground

water table y' = 10.2 kN/m3 and ~ = 36. There is a uniformly distributed surcharge of 10 kPa at

the ground surface as shown in the figure.

a) Use Rankine's theory to determine the distribution of the lateral pressure on the wall i) due to

the soil, ii) due to the surcharge. (5 marks)

b) Determine the required depth of embedment of the piling, d, using FS = 1.4. (15 marks)

c) Determine the force in each tie (the spacing being 2.0 m). (10 marks)

q = 10 kPa

1.5 m

T

Backfill

y = 17 kN/m3

~ = 36

H = 6.4 m

Water

2.4 m

d

W

Figure for Question No. 4

~ Cr. W.T.

y' = 10.2 kN/m3

~ = 36

Pagc 6 of 7

May 2015

07-Str-BS -Final Examination

A pile foundation will be installed in uniform clay of undrained shear strength of C = 50 kPa,

Elastic Modulus, E = 50 MPa, Poisson's ratio, v = 0.5 and bulk unit weight, y = 20 kN/m3. The

clay's coefficient of volume change, m~ = 2.3 x 10"4 m2/kN and initial void ratio, eo = 1.47. There

is a layer of very dense sand at a depth of 34 m below the ground surface. The foundation

consists of 25 circular pre-cast concrete piles each 18m long and 0.4m in diameter. The pile cap

is 5 x 5 m and is founded lm below the ground level. The adhesion factor of the soil/pile

interface, a = 0.8.

a) Determine the ultimate pile capacity of a single pile using the static analysis approach (i.e.

using soil strength parameters) considering undrained conditions. (8 marks)

b) Calculate the ultimate capacity of the pile group. (8 marks)

c) If this foundation is subjected to a vertical centric load of 10 MN, what is the factor of safety

against failure? Comment on the design of this pile group foundation. (6 marks)

d) Check that the serviceability limit state (total settlement) is satisfied using the equivalent raft

method (i.e. using elastic analysis) (8 marks)

~-E

1rn

{~ 1 ('~t ~

`~' ~'' 4--'

`_, .,~

1 ttt

i1"n

1 Y(t

1rn

~~I

fir'~~

~'

~r-}

-}.~~

~-

~_

-~2tt~

..

Page 7 of 7

May 2015

07-Str-BS -Final Examination

An oil storage tank 35m in diameter is located 2m below the surface of a deposit of clay 32m

thick, the water table being at the surface. A firm stratum underlies the clay. The undrained

shear strength of the soft clay is 25 kPa determined from unconfined compression tests on thin

wall 51 mm Shelby tube samples, and its unit weight is 16.5 kN/m3. The average value of m,, for

the clay is 0.14 m2 / MN, and pore pressure coefficient A is 0.65. The undrained value of

Young's modulus is estimated to be 40 MN/m2. The specific gravity of oil is 0.9. It is specified

that the long-term total- settlement of the tank should not exceed 300 mm.

a) To what height can the tank be filled such that ultimate (bearing resistance) and

serviceability (settlement) limit states are satisfied? Neglect the weight of the tank and use

load factor = 1.5 for oil weight, and resistance factor f~ = 0.6. (15 marks)

b) What is the total (overall) factor of safety against bearing capacity failure of the tank for the

oil height determined in (a)? Comment on the results. (5 marks)

c) Calculate the total (overall) factor of safety if a strong wind results in an inclination of 20 of

the load at the foundation level. (10 marks)

F-- 3 5 m ~

Clay

C = 25 kPa

m~=0.14m2/MN

Firm stratum

L = 40 MPa

A=0.65

~I

30m

- er56Uploaded byAnonymous 37PvyXC
- A Constitutive Model for Shear Behavior of Rock Joints Based on Three-Dimensional Quantification of Joint RoughnessUploaded byhotdogqsl
- drivenpiles.pdfUploaded byongyinhoe
- Efecto Fuerza axial en NailsUploaded byPablo Sanzana Jara
- Flood Resulting for Progresive Breached ARTÍCULOUploaded bykoam001
- Foundation Engg QB1Uploaded byVaithees Waran
- 2D and 3D Consolidation - Biot Theory (OCT2011)Uploaded bybsitler
- 2008 08 21 Steel Piling Handbook Design EnglischUploaded byIancu-Bogdan Teodoru
- The Role of Geotechnical Block Models in MineralUploaded byRoss Alva
- FHWA-HRT-05-067Uploaded byaapennsylvania
- GroupUploaded byThomas Bryan
- Slope Stability Vol2Uploaded byJames Laurent
- Steel Piling Handbook DesignUploaded by_ARCUL_
- Rock Cut Slope Design_June 2013Uploaded bylatineb
- Slope Paper 145Uploaded byRonan Cayo
- Segmental Retaining Wall Design TEKUploaded bylcruz117
- 667150900Uploaded byCharilyn Echeverre
- Pile FoundationUploaded byRaymart Paul
- FoundationUploaded bysurappa
- DipAnalyst ManualUploaded byLuc Oli
- bev_exUploaded bycheekiet
- 9780784412138Uploaded byanar
- Helical Pile DatasheetUploaded byAvi Shonberg
- Geography IntroductionUploaded byKamarajan
- Thirapong Pipatpongsa_Statics of Loose Triangular Embankment Under Nadai's Sand Hill Analogy [2010]Uploaded byPrijeSamZnaoCitati
- Georisk2011 Final ProgramUploaded bymornewp
- An integrated model simulating the initation and motion of earthquake and rain induced rapid landslides and its applicatin to the 2006 Leyte landslide.pdfUploaded byMarina Boschkowitz
- bev_ex[1]Uploaded byHo Wing Fung
- Incheon-A4 world Record TestUploaded bythadikkaran
- Geo 2017 Paper 190Uploaded byPablo Cesar Trejo

- Autodesk eBook Bim Getting Started Guide Bldgs EnUploaded bydovi01
- APEGBC Guidelines Professional Structural Engineering Services for Part 3 Building ProjectsUploaded bydovi01
- BIM Curriculum 2015 Lectures 1Uploaded bydovi01
- BIM Curriculum 2015 Lectures 2Uploaded bydovi01
- NAVISWORK CHƯƠNG 3Uploaded bydovi01
- Master Ielts Writing Task i in 20 Minutes - Phiên Bản eBookUploaded bydovi01
- Against Capital PunishmentUploaded bydovi01
- 87077 Saskatoon CentresUploaded bydovi01
- Khóa Học Writing OnlineUploaded bydovi01
- Job SAP Basis Administrator in Saskatoon for Cameco Corporation _ ITjobsUploaded bydovi01
- 2012 Archiving Guidelines v3.2Uploaded bydovi01
- Test1Uploaded bydovi01
- BIAS C 03 PhuongPhapLamViecVoiBIM v 1.0Uploaded bydovi01
- BIAS C 03 PhuongPhapLamViecVoiBIM v 1.0Uploaded bydovi01
- Bai 1 BIAS-01 PhuongPhapTiepNhanBIMchoMotToChuc V1.0Uploaded bydovi01
- NAVISWORK CHƯƠNG 2Uploaded bydovi01
- Hoc Cau Truco Sanh Tu Bao the EconomistUploaded bydovi01
- PMI VRMS Opportunity Opportunity ViewUploaded bydovi01
- Indeed DraftmanUploaded bydovi01
- SaskjobUploaded bydovi01
- NAVISWORK CHƯƠNG 1Uploaded bydovi01
- Tuyen Nguyen IELTSUploaded bydovi01
- Phan 1 Hoan TranUploaded bydovi01
- BIM128338-Aubin-AU2017Uploaded bydovi01
- Ibc Presentation - Firpac FinalfinalUploaded bydovi01
- bim bxdUploaded bydovi01
- bim bxdUploaded bydovi01
- bim bxdUploaded bydovi01
- Anh Hiếu kkUploaded bydovi01
- Bim Cho Nguoi Moi HocUploaded bydovi01

- Axial Pile design.pdfUploaded byoe07m007
- Morgeo.review EnUploaded byMehdiGhoddosi
- Chapter 02 Atterbergs Limits (credits to owner)Uploaded byAllen
- Foundation_05_for_student_with_negative_skin_friction_p130_142%(Downdrag_5)Uploaded byGnabBang
- Helicopter Aided Construction Shane WatsonUploaded byDheeraj Thakur
- geotechnical engineerUploaded byapi-79088498
- PNADS391Uploaded byRahman Siddik
- Wave Forces and Overtopping on Crown Walls of Rubble Mound Breakwaters an Experimental StudyUploaded bymedal2005
- C-91-1341-N30_Rev0Uploaded byajmain
- 5 Drilling TrendUploaded byHadinoorizadegan
- Appendix D5 Geotechnical ReportUploaded byVictor Ciprian
- Site Investigation Pack Introduction2Uploaded byIera Jamil
- Annapurna_Report_Final light v2.pdfUploaded byAnonymous fJ4kmV3ka
- USCSUploaded byMhark Rhomel Cruz
- Sven Ziegler - The Outlook for the Offshore Support Vessel MarketUploaded byckyeak
- ComplicationsUploaded byJosue Emmanuel Blasquez Contreras
- 125079726-CasingUploaded bysouthli
- Jack Up Drilling RigUploaded byBayu Arya S
- SURAIN SAZALIUploaded byzaidi wendal
- hd4103.pdfUploaded bygulfa2k
- Pile Result for Muara SABAK.pdfUploaded byDhimas surya negara
- DNV Pipeline and Facilities BrochureUploaded byjixiang
- Strengthening of Marine Deposit by Deep Cement MixingUploaded byKai Ho
- Table 2007 CBCUploaded bymttaib
- Astm d2487Uploaded byjanexx
- BH-01-PLUploaded byRana Masud
- Soft Subgrade Stabilization With Quarry Dust-An Industrial WasteUploaded byInternational Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology
- WWI TCP ProgramUploaded byFernando Olaveo
- IntroductionUploaded byLuis Felipe Velasco Villegas
- Ssir Rggvy Odiga FinalUploaded byPranay Kumar