You are on page 1of 8

pre-test post-test

22
31
26
27
28
32
28
32
28
34
31
36
32
30
31
32
26
27
31
28
26
37
34
34
30
36
30
30
26
25
30
28
28
26
35
33
17
19
Highest
35
37
Lowest
17
19

t-Test: Paired Two Sample for Means

40
35
30
25
20

pre-test

15

post-test

10
5
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

Mean
Variance
Observations
Pearson Correlation
Hypothesized Mean Difference
df
t Stat
P(T<=t) one-tail
t Critical one-tail
P(T<=t) two-tail
t Critical two-tail

Pre-Test & Post Test Analysis


Interpretation of Data
The table above shows that pre-test scores ranged from17 to 35 while post test scores ranged
from 19 to 37 which means an increase of scores as shown in the gap between the red line(posttest) and
blue line(pretest). Statistical Analysis showed an average of 30.36 for posttest and 28.36 for pre-test.
Analysis
The table reveals that the t Stat is equal 2.179, this is the mean difference between the post test
and pres test scores. The p-value is .021 which is greater than .01 which means that the test scores are
NOT significantly different at 1% level.
Conclusion
As revealed by the foregoing analysis of the data, the interventions made during the
Competency-Based Training(CBT) for Trainers Methodology Level I has no effect with the trainees.
Recommendation
Competency-Based Training for Enhanced Training Methodology I is therefore recommended:

Variable 1
30.36842105
20.02339181
19
0.572280623
0
18
2.179449472
0.021412037
1.734063592
0.042824075
2.100922037

Competency-Based Training for Enhanced Training Methodology I is therefore recommended:


1. CBLM must contain sufficient information and is relevant to the objectives.
2. Select methods that are appropriate with the training need.
3. Provide appropriate course activities.

Variable 2
28.36842105
17.24561404
19

PRE-TEST POST-TEST
41
61
49
57
53
62
53
62
53
64
59
66
61
60
59
62
49
57
59
58
49
67
65
64
57
66
57
60
49
55
57
58
53
56
67
63
31
49
53.74
60.37

80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

t-Test: Paired Two Sample for Means


Variable 1
Mean
60.36842105
Variance
20.02339181
Observations
19
Pearson Correlation
0.572280623
Hypothesized Mean Difference
0
df
18
t Stat
4.240504413
P(T<=t) one-tail
0.000245961
t Critical one-tail
1.734063592
P(T<=t) two-tail
0.000491922
t Critical two-tail
2.100922037

Variable 2
53.73684211
68.98245614
19

Pre-Test - Post Test Analysis

Pre-Test - Post Test Analysis


Interpretation of Data
The table above shows that pre-test scores ranged from 31 to 67 while post test scores ranged from
49 to 67 which means increase of scores as shown in the gap between the red line(posttest) and blue
line(pretest). Statistical Analysis showed an average of 60.37 for posttest and 53.74 for pre-test.
Analysis
Comparison between pre-test and posttest using paired t-test as revealed by the table of values shows
pre-test and posttest are significantly different with a p = 0.00025. This means that mean scores increased.
Conclusion
As revealed by the foregoing analysis of the data, the interventions made during the Competency
Based Training(CBT) for Enhanced Training Methodology I effectively increased the learnings of the trainees.
Recommendation
Competency-Based Training for Trainers Methodology I is therefore recommended for use in all TESDA
institutions using the Competency-Based Training Materials(CBLM).

PRE-TEST
POST-TEST

ost test scores ranged from


posttest) and blue
test.

by the table of values shows


mean scores increased.

during the Competencylearnings of the trainees.

mended for use in all TESDA

You might also like