Professional Documents
Culture Documents
https://dx.doi.org/10.22161/ijaers/3.11.12
www.ijaers.com
Page | 71
Mn
0.37%
0.71%
Youngs Modulus
210 GPa
0.013%
0.94%
4.88%
0.96%
0.17%
Mb
1.68%
Fe
99.63%
Bulk modulus
150 GPa
were
chosen
for
www.ijaers.com
Page | 72
1
2
3
4
1
SPINDLE
SPEED
1
1
1
1
www.ijaers.com
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
III.
RESULT AND DISCUSSION
The experimental work conducted on H13 Die steel with
various process parameters as per design of experiment. The
drilling process are performed by Carbide coated drill. The
result of drilling process parameter are analyzed by signal to
Noise ratio.The surface roughness values are measured by
Surface roughness tester the corresponding values are
shown in table 4.
OA with Surface Roughness values of H 13 Die Steel
SURFACE FINISH
SNRA1
7.32
5.86
6.86
6.54
-17.2902
-15.3580
-16.7265
-16.3116
Page | 73
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
3.58
3.47
3.39
3.18
6.24
5.94
4.93
4.52
4.64
4.48
4.24
4.02
-11.0777
-10.8066
-10.6040
-10.0485
-15.9037
-15.4757
-13.8569
-13.1028
-13.3304
-13.0256
-12.5473
-12.0845
After conducting experiment on H 13 steel plates in drilling process. The most important and influence parameter are represent
by response table (Table 5).It indicate spindle speed is an influence parameter of H13 die steel for achieving lower surface
roughness in drilling process.
Table.5: Response table of H13 Die steel drilled plates
Level
Spindle speed
Feed
1
-16.42
-14.40
2
-1063
-13.67
3
-14.58
-13.43
4
-12.75
-12.89
DELTA
5.79
1.51
RANK
1
2
M a in E f f e c t s P lo t f o r S N r a t io s
D ata M ean s
s p in d le s p e e d
-1 0
fe e d
Mean of SN ratios
-1 1
-1 2
-1 3
-1 4
-1 5
-1 6
-1 7
1
S i g n a l - t o -n o i se : S m a l l e r i s b e t t e r
www.ijaers.com
Page | 74
P-VALUE
0.000
0.112
Table 6 shows that Spindle speed is a dominating parameter in drilling process on H13 die steel plates based on higher value of F
value. It produce better surface finish and dimensional tolerance by using carbide coated drill. The R sq values (93.20 %) indicate
the most significant of process parameter and experiments are conducted in efficient method.
The contour plot shows (fig 5) that lower surface roughness is achieved in drilling process with significant.
C o n t o u r P lo t o f s u r f a c e r o u g h n e s s v s f e e d , s p in d le s p e e d
4.0
s u r fa c e
r o u g h n ess
< 4
4
5
5
6
6
7
> 7
3 .5
feed
3 .0
2 .5
2 .0
1. 5
1. 0
1. 0
1.5
2 .0
2.5
3.0
3 .5
4.0
sp in d le sp e ed
www.ijaers.com
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
Page | 75
[6] Paul, A.; Kappor, S.G. & Devor R.E. (2005). Chisel
Edge and Cutting Lip Shape Optimization for
Improved Twist Drill Point Design, International
Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 45, pp.421431.
[7] RP Rampersad, Hareland, G., and Boonyapaluk, P.:
Drilling Optimization Using Drilling Data and
Available Technology, paper SPE 27034 presented at
the SPE LAPEC Conference, Buenos Aires, 27-29
April, 2009.
[8] B.Y. Lee, H.S. Liu and Y.S. Tarng, (2006). Modeling
and Optimization of Drilling Process. Department of
Mechanical Manufacture Engineering, National Huwei
Institute of Technology, Huwei, 632,pp. 1-9.
[9] Kadam M.S., Pathak S.S.Experimental Analysis and
Comparative Performance of Coated and Uncoated
Twist Drill Bit Dry Machining International Journal of
Research in Mechanical Engineering and Technology
Vol. 1, Issue 1, Oct. 2011.
[10] S.A. Jalali and W.J. Kolarik, (2001). Tool life and
Mach Inability Models for Drilling Steels,
International Journal of Machine Tools &
Manufacture, 31 (3), pp. 273282.
www.ijaers.com
Page | 76