Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Review
Reviewed Work(s): The Bramble Bush by K. N. Llewellyn
Review by: Grant Gilmore
Source: The Yale Law Journal, Vol. 60, No. 7 (Nov., 1951), pp. 1251-1253
Published by: The Yale Law Journal Company, Inc.
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/793699
Accessed: 08-11-2016 22:22 UTC
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted
digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about
JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
http://about.jstor.org/terms
The Yale Law Journal Company, Inc. is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access
to The Yale Law Journal
This content downloaded from 103.231.241.233 on Tue, 08 Nov 2016 22:22:08 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
REVIEWS
said that teaching law is better than working for a living: Llewelly
it an arduous, varied, exciting business. To whoever was willing
has taught best by the example of his own practice: Never be do
Never forget that there are an indefinite number of sides to any
Llewellyn called his first book The Bramble Bush and, autobiogr
speaking, named it well: throughout his career he has kept enthu
many of us will agree, his vision as well. Now, twenty years afte
publication, The Bramble Bush is with us again-in its first commer
ing with a few new words added for the occasion.
the student." Indeed that is all we can usefully do; the forma
ourselves.
This content downloaded from 103.231.241.233 on Tue, 08 Nov 2016 22:22:08 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
1252
[Vol. 60
Realism and functionalism were fighting words in the thirties and took up as
much space in the law reviews as articles on how to teach law do today.
Llewellyn was not the First Realist or even one of the Great Artisans of
Realism: he came in the second generation, but shortly emerged as the most
active spokesman for the new school.
The Bramble Bush, as manifesto, tells us that the law is not a self-contained set of logical propositions; that rules of law do not explain results at
law; that the stated reasons for decision regularly mask the inarticulate major
premise; that facts are slippery things with a nasty habit of changing shape
and color, depending on who is looking at them; that judges are not automatons who announce the law but human beings, possibly neurotic; that juries
are barely human; that the truth is not in the law books, which should never-
theless still be studied; that we don't quite know yet where the truth is, but
it is somewhere-in economics, or sociology, or anthropology, or psychology,
or in the murky reaches of Freudian theory.
These ideas no longer excite us, which is more our good fortune than
their fault. They are the ideas which destroyed classical jurisprudence. They
are the ideas which set us free. They are ideas which have served their time
and passed out of controversy. They may now take their place alongside the
theory that the earth is round and Harvey's quackery about the circulation
of the blood.
what used to be called "related disciplines" may have become more learned;
no one became any wiser.
At twenty years distance we may with the prescience of hindsight pass
judgment. Llewellyn and his co-conspirators were right in everything they
said about the law. They skillfully led us into the swamp. Their mistake
was in being sure that they knew the way out of the swamp: they did not,
This content downloaded from 103.231.241.233 on Tue, 08 Nov 2016 22:22:08 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
1951]
1253
REVIEWS
The
The Bramble
BrambleBush
Bush
is is
farfar
from
from
being
being
all literary
all literary
manifesto
manifesto
or advice
or to
advice
law to law
students
studentson
onhow
how
not
not
to to
flunk
flunk
out out
of school.
of school.
WhatWhat
comescomes
through
through
best- bestand
and what
whatmust
musthave
have
gotgot
through
through
to the
to entering
the entering
class at
class
Columbia
at Columbia
in the in the
days
days when
whenthe
thebull
bull
market
market
lay lay
dying-is
dying-is
Llewellyn's
Llewellyn's
own feeling
own feeling
that thethat
law-the lawstudying
studyinglaw,
law,practicing
practicing
law,
law,
teaching
teaching
law-is
law-is
a vital,
a vital,
creative,
creative,
exhilarating
exhilarating
affair
affairwhich
whichwill
will
reward
reward
thethe
bestbest
efforts
efforts
of the
ofbest
theminds
best minds
that will
that
apply
will apply
themselves
themselvestotoit.it.
My
My
own
own
thought
thought
is that
is that
at the
atend
theofend
theof
first
theterm
firstallterm
law all law
students
studentsshould
should
bebe
asked
asked
oneone
question:
question:
thosethose
who answer
who answer
that the
that
lawthe
is a law is a
dull
dull thing
thingshould,
should,
after
after
reading
reading
The The
Bramble
Bramble
Bush,Bush,
be given
be another
given another
chance: chance:
if
if they
theyfail
faila asecond
second
time
time
they
they
should
should
be expelled
be expelled
forthwith:
forthwith:
they are
they
hopeless.
are hopeless.
There
There are
aremany
many
easier
easier
ways
ways
of living,
of living,
eveneven
of making
of making
a living,
a living,
than practicing
than practicing
law:
law: like
likethe
theaesthete
aesthete
in in
hishis
garret,
garret,
any any
lawyer
lawyer
shouldshould
expectexpect
to worktolong
work long
hours
hours for
formeagre
meagre
rewards
rewards
andand
no public
no public
acclaim.
acclaim.
But anyone
But anyone
who cares
whotocares to
know
know why
whynothing
nothing
in in
thethe
world
world
can can
be sobemuch
so much
fun can
fun
docan
no better
do no than
better than
to read these lectures.
After The Bramble Bush Llewellyn rode off in all directions. He wrote a
classical series of articles on commercial law, taking fliers in constitutional
and criminal law as breathers. He drafted the Uniform Trust Receipts Act,
whose appalling difficulties of construction are matched only by the Act's
essential soundness: the Act has worked, and worked well, although no one
knows how or why. In collaboration with an anthropologist, he produced
a fascinating study of the law of the Cheyenne Indians. For the past ten
years he has been the Chief Reporter for, and the principal architect of, the
now completed Uniform Commercial Code.
We may hope that Llewellyn after his twenty years in the brambles will now
return to his first love. It is high time for all of us-law professors, lawyers,
law students-to get back to first principles. Few are as well equipped to
guide us as the author of The Bramble Bush.
GRANT GILMOREt
COLLECTIVE BARGAINING. By Neil W. Chamberlain. New York: McGrawHill Book Company, 1951. Pp. vii, 534. $6.00.
HERE is a penetrating and analytical exposition of the collective bargaining
process. Narrow in scope but intensive in treatment, this volume contains
some helpful theoretical apparatus and some original insights. The volume
is also significant methodologically, for Professor Chamberlain has taken a
long stride toward the integrated inter-disciplinary approach so badly needed
in the social sciences.
This content downloaded from 103.231.241.233 on Tue, 08 Nov 2016 22:22:08 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms