Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
0010-9312/08/000169/$5.00+$0.50/0
2008, NACE International
939
TABLE 1
Welding Parameters
TIG (GTAW)
MAG (GMAW)
EBW
190
Horizontal
Ar
100 to 300
11.0 to 13.5(C)
5.7 to 11.7
38
54
23 to 90
24.5
190
Flat
Ar-20% CO2
350
34 to 36(C)
28
20
40
51 to 54
2.4
100
Horizontal
0.6(B)
100 000(D)
25
1
1
144
0.13
Base current.
Beam current.
Arc voltage.
Accelerating voltage.
TABLE 2
Chemical Composition (wt%)
C
Si
Mn
Cu
Cr
Mo
TIG
Weld metal
Base metal(A)
Filler metal(C)
0.11
0.15
0.10
0.67
0.19
0.73
1.29
0.36
1.40
0.009
0.006
0.011
0.011
0.002
0.014
0.25
0.01
0.24
0.02
0.05
0.03
<0.01
0.01
MAG
Weld metal
Base metal(B)
Filler metal(C)
0.082
0.11
0.10
0.58
0.25
0.76
1.07
0.65
1.37
0.010
0.007
0.010
0.014
0.002
0.014
0.20
0.05
0.24
0.03
0.04
<0.01
0.01
EBW
Weld metal
Base metal(B)
0.11
0.12
0.25
0.25
0.70
0.65
0.011
0.012
0.003
0.004
0.05
0.05
0.11
0.11
0.02
0.02
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Material Preparation and Properties
Tungsten inert gas welding (TIG; also known as
gas tungsten arc welding, GTAW), metal active gas
welding (MAG; also known as gas metal arc welding, GMAW), and electron beam welding (EBW) were
applied to a low-carbon steel, cylindrical specimen
940
CORROSIONDECEMBER 2008
(a)
(b)
(c)
FIGURE 1. Macrostructures of a cross section of the weld zone: (a)
TIG, (b) MAG, and (c) EBW.
ranged from 700 mVSCE to 625 mVSCE, corresponding to the active-passive transition zone of anodic
polarization curves. Figure 3 shows potentiodynamic
polarization curves for TIG and EBW specimens;
polarization curves for MAG specimens were similar to
those in Figure 3. All potential values are given with
941
TABLE 3
Results of Metallographic Examination for As-Welded Specimens
TIG
MAG
EBW
Ferrite
(GBF, AF, FSP)
Ferrte
(GBF, AF, FSP)
Ferrite,
pearlite
Ferrite
pearlite
HAZ
near weld metal
HAZ
near base metal
Ferrite (PF),
pearlite
Ferrite (PF),
pearlite
Ferrite (PF),
pearlite
Base metal
Ferrite (PF),
pearlite
Ferrite (PF),
pearlite
Ferrite (PF),
pearlite
Weld metal
as-deposited zone
Weld metal
reheated zone
PF: Polygonal ferrite, FSP: ferrite side plate, AF: acicular ferrite, GBF: grain boundary ferrite.
(a)
respect to SCE at ambient temperature. Based on previous research,10 specimens were strained at a constant strain rate of 8.3 107 s1. Slow strain rate tests
with silicone oil as a heat transfer medium were also
carried out at the same temperature and strain rate to
compare behavior in an inert environment.
After testing was completed, the specimens were
descaled by cathodic electrolysis in ammonium citrate
(C6H14N2O7) solution and the fracture surfaces were
observed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM).
Cross-sectional microscopic observation was also performed to examine the relationship between fracture
morphology and microstructure.
RESULTS
(b)
(c)
FIGURE 2. Test specimen geometry: (a) orientation and location of
test specimens on as-welded material, (b) test specimen dimensions,
and (c) weld zone locations on the test specimens (type VI).
942
CORROSIONDECEMBER 2008
(a)
(b)
FIGURE 3. Potentiodynamic polarization curves (1 M NaHCO3-0.5 M Na2CO3 solution, 80C, 20 mV/min): (a) TIG specimen
and (b) EBW specimen.
where the lowest ductility was seen, is shown in Figure 6. In general, the stress applied to HAZ and the
weld metal was much higher than that applied to the
base metal during SCC testing because of the higher
yield strength of the weld zone. The strain to failure
of HAZ and the weld metal was, however, larger than
that of the base metal, regardless of the welding
method. These results suggest that both the HAZ and
weld metal specimens were examined under more
severe SCC conditions than the base metal specimens.
The specimens composed of both base metal and weld
zone in the gauge section (type IV) had higher maximum stress and lower strain to failure than the base
metal specimen. All type IV specimens ruptured at the
base metal with no cracking in the weld zone, no matter which welding method was used.9
Figure 7 shows SEM observation of the fracture
surface for the TIG base metal specimen after SCC
testing in the test solution. The brittle area surrounding a ductile area on the fracture surface was assumed
to be promoted by SCC, since the fracture surfaces of
all specimens were fully ductile in silicone oil. The
FIGURE 6. Stress-strain curves for TIG specimens (0.5 M NaHCO31 M Na2CO3 solution, 675 mV, 80C, strain rate of 8.3 107 s1).
943
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
FIGURE 7. SEM photograph of TIG specimen fracture surface after SCC test (1 M NaHCO3-0.5 M Na2CO3 solution, 80C,
strain rate of 8.3 107 s1, 675 mVSCE). (a) Base metal specimen, (b) magnified view of (a), (c) HAZ specimen, (d) magnified
view of (c) base metal side, (e) magnified view of (c) weld metal side, (f) weld metal specimen, and (g) magnified view of (f).
944
CORROSIONDECEMBER 2008
of the base metal and weld metal sides were somewhat different (Figures 7[c], [d], and [e]). Similar
results were obtained with the EBW and MAG specimens.9 The crack depth on the fracture surface differed with the type of specimen. Figure 8 shows the
relationship between the applied potential and the
average crack growth rate (CGR) for TIG specimens.
The average CGR in this study was calculated by the
crack depth on the fracture surface seen in SEM observation and the time interval from the yield point to
failure of the specimen. It was found that the most severe SCC occurred at a potential of about 675 mV in
all specimens. At this potential, the order of the specimens in terms of decreasing maximum crack depth
or CGR was base metal, weld metal, HAZ near base
metal, and HAZ near weld metal. The CGR for specimens with different welding methods is summarized
in Figure 9. The CGR of the weld zone was less than
that of base metal, irrespective of the welding method.
Cross-sectional images of the cracks near the
fracture surface are shown in Figure 10. It can be
seen that SCC morphology was strongly dependent on
the microstructure. For the base metal, which has a
typical ferrite-pearlite microstructure, intergranular
SCC propagated along both the ferrite-ferrite and the
ferrite-pearlite boundaries (Figure 10[a]). Propagation
of some cracks seemed to stop at the pearlite (Figure
10[b]). In contrast to the base metal, the crack morphology in the weld zone was more complicated.
Metallographic cross-sectional observation of HAZ
showed that redistribution or dispersion of pearlite
near the weld metal occurred with welding heat input
(Figures 10[c] through [f]). It is noteworthy that SCC
propagation tended to avoid pearlite or pearlite-dispersed regions and seemed to propagate along ferriteferrite boundaries rather than ferrite-pearlite
boundaries in the HAZ (Figures 10[e] and [f]). The
weld metal was composed of a very ne-grained
microstructure of ferrite and pearlite (Table 3, Figures
10[g] and [h]). The cross-sectional images showed that
the weld metal specimens ruptured at the as-deposited zone or the intermediate zone between as-deposited and reheated zones. Many cracks appeared on
the surface of the specimens, although in general,
they were shallow and slight. The weld metal microstructure was so ne and complicated that it is difcult to characterize denitively the SCC morphology;
crack paths seemed to be transgranular or a mixture
of intergranular and transgranular, because some of
the straight cracking propagated through the matrix,
regardless of the ferrite microstructure shape or direction (Figure 10[h]). No preferential cracking was
observed at the prior austenite grain boundaries, which
were found in the HAZ and weld metal specimens.
In comparison with specimens consisting of similar microstructures, the features of SCC morphology
in the MAG and EBW specimens were generally similar to those of the TIG specimens. The crack depths
DISCUSSION
It was shown by slow strain rate SCC testing that
both the base metal and weld zone were susceptible to
SCC in a 1.5-M carbonate-bicarbonate solution, and
that the potentials at which the lowest ductility was
seen were nearly identical, regardless of welding
method (TIG, MAG, or EBW) or sampling location
(base metal, HAZ, or weld metal). Parkins13-14 indicated
that the potential range for SCC of carbon steel in the
945
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
FIGURE 10. Cross-sectional micrograph of crack near fracture surface of TIG specimen after SCC test (1 M NaHCO30.5 M Na2CO3 solution, 80C, strain rate of 8.3 107 s1, 675 mVSCE): (a), (b) base metal; (c), (d) HAZ near the base metal;
(e), (f) HAZ near the weld metal; and (g), (h) weld metal.
946
CORROSIONDECEMBER 2008
(a)
(b)
FIGURE 11. Cross-sectional micrograph of crack near fracture
surface of EBW specimen after SCC test (1 M NaHCO3-0.5 M
Na2CO3 solution, 80C, strain rate of 8.3 107 s1, 675 mVSCE): (a),
(b) base metal.
at the grain boundaries, a result of the decomposition of pearlite in the base metal caused by the rapid
heat cycle from the weld heat input, suggesting that
redistribution of cementite in specic regions or grain
boundaries has a signicant effect on SCC propagation. Cementite localization may affect electrochemical
behavior, microplastic deformation, and local stress
eld in regions adjacent to grain boundaries. Crack
propagation in the weld zone is thought to have been
suppressed by the ne microstructure along with
redistribution of cementite in the crack paths.
The weld zone microstructure was complicated,
containing not only ferrite and pearlite but also
bainitic ferrite and upper bainite. However, no preferential cracking was observed in the bainitic ferrite or upper bainite. Asahi, et al.,7 studied the effect
of metallurgical factors on SCC of low-carbon steel
in carbonate-bicarbonate solution, and revealed that
a bainitic ferrite structure is less susceptible to SCC
than a ferrite-pearlite structure, which seems to suggest that formation of a bainitic structure does not
promote SCC susceptibility.
947
CONCLUSIONS
The inuence of welding on SCC susceptibility for
carbon steel in a carbonate-bicarbonate solution was
studied. SSRT was applied to low-carbon steel specimens welded by processes for HLW overpack. SCC
test results showed that the base metal and weld
zone were susceptible to SCC in a 1.5-M carbonatebicarbonate solution and that the potentials at which
the lowest ductility was seen were nearly identical,
regardless of welding method (TIG, EBW, or MAG) or
sampling location (base metal, HAZ, or weld metal).
SCC morphology was strongly dependent on the
microstructure of the specimens. In the base metal,
which consists of a typical ferrite-pearlite microstructure, SCC mainly propagated along ferrite-ferrite or
ferrite-pearlite boundaries. The SCC morphology of
the weld zone, which has a ne microstructure, was
more complicated and clearly differed from that of the
base metal. SCC in the weld zone tended to propagate
along ferrite-ferrite boundaries and avoid pearlite or
pearlite-dispersed regions.
948
The maximum crack depth on the fracture surface and the crack growth rate of base metal were
higher than those of the weld zone, although the tensile stress of specimens for the base metal was much
lower than that for the weld zone. These results supported that the weld zone was less susceptible to
SCC than the base metal. It was assumed that crack
propagation of the weld zone was suppressed by negrained microstructure and/or distribution of carbon
around the crack path.
It is concluded that the susceptibility to SCC at the
weld zone caused by an inuence of welding is much
less than that of the base metal.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors extend their appreciation to T. Haruna of Kansai University and H. Inoue of Osaka Prefecture University. This research was funded by a
grant from the Ministry of Economy, Trade, and
Industry, Japan.
REFERENCES
1. JNC TN1410 2000-003, H12: Project to Establish the Scientic
and Technical Basis for HLW Disposal in Japan, Project Overview
Report, 2nd Progress Report on Research and Development for
the Geological Disposal of HLW in Japan (Ibaraki, Japan: Japan
Nuclear Cycle Development Institute [JNC], 2000).
2. H. Asano, S. Sawa, M. Aritomi, J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 42, 6 (2005):
p. 573.
3. H. Asano, K. Maeda, M. Aritomi, J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 43, 2
(2006): p. 206.
4. H. Asano, A. Otsuki, K. Kamo, S. Kataoka, Development of Remote Welding and Inspection Techniques for Final Closure of
Overpack, (3) Evaluation of Arc and High-Energy Beam Welding
Methods, Proc. Spring Meeting of Atomic Energy Society of
Japan (Tokyo, Japan: Atomic Energy Society of Japan [AESJ],
2006), p. B21.
5. R.N. Parkins, The Controlling Parameters in Stress Corrosion
Cracking, Proc. 5th Symp. on Line Pipe Research (Houston, TX:
American Gas Association [AGA], 1974), p. U-1.
6. B. Poulson, Corros. Sci. 15 (1975): p. 469.
7. H. Asahi, T. Kushida, M. Kimura, H. Fukai, S. Okano, Corrosion
55, 7 (1999): p. 644.
8. RWMC Report, Investigation on the Performance of Engineered
Barrier System Considering the Weld Joint of Overpack Materials, H.16 Report (Tokyo, Japan: Radioactive Waste Management
Funding Center [RWMC], 2005).
9. RWMC Report, Investigation on the Performance of Engineered
Barrier System Considering the Weld Joint of Overpack Materials, H.17 Report (Tokyo, Japan: Radioactive Waste Management
Funding Center [RWMC], 2006).
10. K. Kasahara, T. Sato, Tetsu-to-Hagane 69 (1983): p. 1,463.
11. J.M. Sutcliffe, R.R. Fessler, W.K. Boyd, R.N. Parkins, Corrosion
28, 8 (1972): p. 313.
12. R.N. Parkins, P.W. Slattery, B.S. Poulson, Corrosion 37, 11
(1981): p. 650.
13. R.N. Parkins, Environmental Aspects of Stress Corrosion Cracking in Low Strength Ferritic Steels, in Stress Corrosion Cracking
Hydrogen Embrittlement Iron Base Alloys (Houston, TX: NACE,
1977), p. 601.
14. R.N. Parkins, Corros. Sci. 20, 2 (1980): p. 147.
15. R.L. Wenk, Field Investigation of Stress Corrosion Cracking,
Proc. 5th Symp. on Line Pipe Research (Houston, TX: American Gas Association [AGA], 1974), p. T-1.
16. M.J. Danielson, R.H. Jones, P. Dusek, Effect of Microstructured
and Microchemistry on the SCC Behavior of Archival and Modern
Pipeline Steels in a High-pH Environment, CORROSION/2001,
paper no. 01211 (Houston, TX: NACE, 2001).
CORROSIONDECEMBER 2008