Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Journal of Advertising
Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information:
http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ujoa20
Gary L. Geissler Ph.D. , George M. Zinkhan Ph.D. & Richard T. Watson Ph.D.
a
University of Georgia
Published online: 04 Mar 2013.
To cite this article: Gary L. Geissler Ph.D. , George M. Zinkhan Ph.D. & Richard T. Watson Ph.D. (2006): The Influence of
Home Page Complexity on Consumer Attention, Attitudes, and Purchase Intent, Journal of Advertising, 35:2, 69-80
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2006.10639232
Summer 2006 69
ABSTRACT: The Web is an increasingly important component of promotional strategy for many organizations. To date,
most advertising research has focused on banner ads. In the present study, home pages as promotional vehicles are evaluated.
Specifically, we examine the influence of perceived home page complexity on communication effectiveness, as measured by
attention to the home page, attitude toward the home page, attitude toward the company, and purchase intent. Qualitative
research is used to identify important factors that appear to influence perceptions of home page complexity, including
home page length, number of graphics, number of links, amount of text, and use of animation. A pretest experiment
further aided in the selection of appropriate factors and factor levels to manipulate in a subsequent, main experiment. The
findings in the main experiment suggest that consumers respond more favorably toward home pages that fall in a moderate
range of perceived complexity.
FIGURE 1
Predicted Relationship Between Home Page
Complexity and Communication Effectiveness
Communication
Effectiveness
Summer 2006 71
concerned the relationship between perceived home page complexity and communication effectiveness as follows:
H2: Home pages that are perceived in a range of moderate
complexity will achieve higher levels of communication
effectiveness than home pages in either a less complex or more
complex range on:
a. attention to the home page (ATThp)
TABLE 1
Web Usage Classification
Light users: Accessed the Web 1 to 3 times during the past 30
days.
Medium users: Accessed the Web 4 to 14 times during the past 30
days (i.e., at least once per week).
Heavy users: Accessed the Web 15 or more times during the past
30 days (i.e., at least every other day).
Triers: Have accessed the Web before, but not during the past 30
days.
PRELIMINARY RESEARCH
Overview
Although published guidelines pertaining to Web home page
design abound (e.g., Bucy et al. 1999; Hoque and Lohse 1999;
Kassaye 1997; Nielsen 1999; Woodbeck 1995), they often
rely on opinion and personal observation or experience and
not on empirical research (DAngelo and Little 1998). We
used a systematic approach to provide a basis for deciding
which factors and levels contribute to perceived home page
complexity. Extensive qualitative research and a pretest experiment were conducted. The qualitative research included
4 focus group discussions with Web users and triers, and
20 in-depth telephone interviews and 10 personal interviews
with Web site designers. This research helped identify potentially important factors influencing perceived home page
complexity, which were tested in a fractional-factorial, pretest experiment.
Qualitative Research
The focus groups relevant to the present investigation included
three groups of Web users (light, medium, and heavy users)
and one group of Web triers that had to meet Web usage
screening qualifications (see Table 1).
In addition, participants had to be age 18 or older. A mix
of students and nonstudents and a range of ages were recruited.
Approximately half of the participants were male and approximately half were female. Participants were not to have taken
part in another market research study during the prior three
months.
An experienced moderator conducted the discussions, which
were subsequently transcribed for analysis. Emergent themes
were identified and developed after reviews of each transcript.
Preliminary findings were compared across groups to identify common themes and key differences.
Summer 2006 73
TABLE 2
Web Usage: Experimental Subjects Versus U. S. Population
Experimental sample
U. S. population
97%
71%
6%
5%
28%
38%
66%
56%
Source: UCLA Internet Report: Surveying the Digital Future, Year Three, UCLA Center for Communication Policy (January 2003), available at
(www.digitalcenter.org/pdf/InternetReportYearThree.pdf).
* U.S. population Web usage categories are defined as follows:
Relatively inexperienced users: Less than one year on-line
Moderately experienced users: One year to less than four years on-line
Very experienced users: Four or more years on-line
1
5
9
13
Home page
length (number
of screens)
1
2
3
Number of
graphics
1
4
7
Measures
The survey instrument primarily contained previously developed scales, modified when needed based on the pretest, to
measure perceived complexity (as described above) and several key dependent variables: attention to the home page
(ATThp), attitude toward the home page (Ahp), attitude toward the company (Ac), and purchase intent (PI). ATThp is a
self-report measure of the degree to which a person perceives
that a home page gained and held attention. Ahp is based on
an attitude toward the ad scale. Given the relative lack of Ac
scales in the marketing literature, the Ac scale was adapted
from an attitude toward the brand (Ab) scale, which measures
similar items. PI is a scale developed to measure purchase
intent of the products offered on the home page. The dependent variable scales are unidimensional, as evidenced by a series of factor analyses. All of the scales yielded acceptable
reliabilities, as reported in the Appendix showing the scale
origins and items.
Findings
Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) revealed that Web usage
was not a significant covariate (F ratio = 3.20, p < .05). In
other words, the results do not vary across the levels of reported Web usage. This is possibly because students represent a relatively experienced and similar group of Web users.
The effects of specific, home page design elements on perceived complexity were determined by ANOVA (see Table
4). This analysis confirmed that the complexity manipulation worked. The overall model was significant (F = 3.54,
df = 35, p < .001). That is, number of graphics, number of
links, and home page size influence perceived complexity.
Although all of the main effects were significant, there was
also a significant interaction.
Perceived complexity tends to increase as the number of
links increases. Examining the mean complexity scores for
number of links in isolation was appropriate, since the main
effect for the number of links was significant and there was
no significant interaction with other variables. The interaction between the number of graphics and the length of the
home page significantly influenced ( p < .01) the perceived
complexity of the home page. Most notably, the one-screen
manipulation was seen as more complex than the two- or threescreen manipulations at each graphics level. Specifically, the
home page was viewed as most complex when it had only one
screen and four or seven graphics. It was moderately complex
when it had only one screen and one graphic, or when it had
Summer 2006 75
FIGURE 2
Proposed Model of Home Page
Complexity and Communication Effectiveness
TABLE 4
ANOVA Results
F value
Main effects
Links
Graphics
HPlength
6.17**
12.09**
19.42**
Two-way interactions
Link graphics
Links HPlength
Graphics HPlength
Number of graphics
Number of links
Home page length
1.35
1.30
3.76*
Three-way interaction
Links graphics HPlength
.96
Perceptions of
Home Page Complexity
** p < .01.
** p < .001.
seven graphics spread over two screens. The home page was
perceived as least complex when it had one or four graphics
spread over two screens or when it had three screens, regardless of the number of graphics.
We were interested in perceived differences between home
pages, so this was the unit of analysis. We expected to find
that a home pages complexity score in the moderate range
would be associated with greater communication effectiveness. In other words, an inverse (i.e., negative) curvilinear relationship between perceived complexity and communication
effectiveness was predicted. A linear regression model was not
significant in any of the tests. The appropriate regression model
is a quadratic, where the average ATThp, Ahp, Ac, and PI score
for each home page are dependent variables and the average
perceived complexity score constitutes as the independent variable. The results are summarized in Table 5.
Overall, the preponderance of statistical evidence supports the
central hypothesis (H1). Consumers respond more favorably toward home pages perceived in a range of moderate complexity
than those in either a less complex or more complex range.
A proposed model of home page complexity and communication effectiveness is presented in Figure 2. The model shows
the home page elements (i.e., number of graphics, number of
links, and home page length) found to have the greatest influence (among those tested) on perceptions of home page complexity. Perceived complexity, in turn, influences all of the
measures of communication effectiveness (i.e., ATThp, Ahp, Ac,
and PI) in a curvilinear manner, as predicted by Berlyne.
DISCUSSION
The level of home page complexity should be a key consideration for Web site designers and advertisers. Our study sup-
Measures of Communication
Effectiveness:
ports the notion that home page complexity influences consumer attention, attitudes, and purchase intent. By examining a wide range of home page complexity, we demonstrate
that an optimal zone of moderate complexity exists, which
facilitates communication effectiveness. To reach maximum
effectiveness, home pages must go beyond some minimal range
of complexity, but avoid exceeding an optimal moderate range.
While the term zone implies that a multitude of combinations of home page elements can be used to achieve moderate
home page complexity, the solution is to present enough information and graphics, but not too much of either. Certainly,
some important information and attractive graphics on the
home page have a positive influence on consumer attitudes
and purchase intent. Too much information and too many
graphics have a negative effect, however, as consumers may
feel overwhelmed or lost, which may cause them to lose focus
and interest rapidly.
A critical issue when determining an appropriate level of
home page complexity is whether the home page is the ad or
simply the background for an ad. Berlynes theory suggests
Dependent
variable
Quadratic
model significance
Variance
explained
Quadratic term
significance
Supported
p < .001
p < .001
p < .005
p < .05
.335
.525
.271
.209
p < .001
p < .001
p < .005
p < .05
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Note: ATThp = attention to the home page; Ahp = attitude toward the home page; Ac = attitude toward the company; PI = purchase intention.
Summer 2006 77
Madden, Thomas J. (1982), Humor in Advertising: Applications of a Hierarchy of Effects Paradigm, Ph.D. diss., University of Massachusetts.
Mitchell, Andrew A., and Jerry C. Olson (1981), Are Product
Attribute Beliefs the Only Mediator of Advertising Effects
on Brand Attitude? Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (3),
318322.
Morrison, Bruce J., and Marvin J. Dainoff (1972), Advertisement Complexity and Looking Time, Journal of Marketing
Research, 9 (4), 396400.
Nielsen, Jakob (1999), User Interface Directions for the Web,
Communications of the ACM, 42 (1), 6572.
Nielsen Media Research-NTI (2004), TV Basics: Television
Households, available at www.nielsenmedia.com (accessed
July 24, 2005).
Nour, Mohamed A., and Adam Fadlalla (2000), A Framework
for Web Marketing Strategies, Information Systems Management, 17 (2), 4150.
Richards, Jef I., and Catharine M. Curran (2002), Oracles on
Advertising: Searching for a Definition, Journal of Advertising, 31 (2), 6377.
Singh, Surendra N., and Nikunj P. Dalal (1999), Web Home
Pages as Advertisements, Communications of the ACM, 42
(8), 9199.
Stevenson, Julie S., Gordon C. Bruner, and Anand Kumar (2000),
Webpage Background and Viewer Attitudes, Journal of
Advertising Research, 40 (1), 2934.
UCLA Internet Report: Surveying the Digital Future, Year
Three (2003), UCLA Center for Communication Policy
(January), available at www.digitalcenter.org/pdf/
InternetReportYearThree.pdf.
U.S. Census Bureau (2003), Current Population Survey, available at www.census.gov (accessed March 4, 2004).
Watson, Richard T., George M. Zinkhan, and Leyland F. Pitt
(2000), Integrated Internet Marketing, Communications of
the ACM, 43 (6), 97102.
Woodbeck, Dean (1995), Making the Web Work for You,
Currents, 21 (10), 4045.
Yoon, Sung-Joon, and Joo-Ho Kim (2001), Is the Internet
More Effective Than Traditional Media? Factors Affecting
the Choice of Media, Journal of Advertising Research, 41 (4),
5360.
Summer 2006 79
APPENDIX
Multi-item Scales Used in the Main Experiment
Complexity, Cronbachs = .75 (adapted from Leigh 1984)
Does not
describe
at all
Describes
very well
2
1. Complex
2. Dense
3. Interactive
4. Has much variety
Attention to the home page (ATThp) (seven-point semantic differential scale), = .83 (adapted from Madden 1982)
1. At gaining my attention, the Web home page was: not effective/effective.
2. At holding my attention, the Web home page was: not effective/effective.
3. During my review of the Web home page, I was: not alert/alert;
unemotional/emotional; not observant/observant; aimless/motivated.
Attitude toward the home page (Ahp) (seven-point semantic differential scale), = .94 (adapted from MacKenzie,
Lutz, and Belch 1986; Mitchell and Olson 1981)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Uninformative/Informative
Unfavorable/Favorable
Incomplete/Complete
Unlikable/Likable
Poorly structured/Well-structured
Dull/Exciting
Not entertaining/Entertaining
Uninteresting/Interesting
Attitude toward the company (Ac) (seven-point semantic differential scale), = .94 (adapted from Grossbart,
Muehling, and Kangun 1986)
1. Bad/Good
2. Poor quality/High quality
3. Unfavorable/Favorable
4. Inferior/Superior
5. Negative/Positive
Very likely
to buy
2
1. If you were to buy a music cassette tape during the next three months, how likely or unlikely would you be to buy it from the
company shown on the Web home page?
2. If you were to buy a music CD during the next three months, how likely or unlikely would you be to buy it from the company
shown on the Web home page?