Professional Documents
Culture Documents
(update 2009)
(update 2009)
0-97504-730-2
Foreword
Foreword
We are pleased to present the Import Risk Analysis Handbook 2007 (update 2009).
Australia is fortunate to be free from many of the serious pests and diseases that exist in many other
countries. Our quarantine system and the biosecurity policy that underpins this system is essential
to maintain our highly favourable plant and animal health status and environment. Accordingly, the
Australian Government has set Australias appropriate level of protection as being one that reduces the
quarantine risks associated with imported goods to a very low level, but not to zero.
The improvements to the import risk analysis process, established by amendments to the Quarantine
Regulations 2000 that took effect on 5 September 2007, build on what is already a world-class
system. The improvements enhance the scientific scrutiny and the overall transparency of Australias
quarantine import risk analysis process. No less importantly, the changes make the process more
timely, without compromising opportunities for thorough consultation with stakeholders.
This updated Handbook, developed jointly by Biosecurity Australia and the Department, reflects
the improvements that have been made to the process, input from stakeholders and Biosecurity
Australias extensive experience with risk analysis.
The Import Risk Analysis Handbook 2007 (update 2009) builds upon two earlier editions, published
in 1998 and 2003. These earlier Handbooks have already played an important role in increasing
understanding of Australias approach to import risk analysis and were valuable reference materials
for Biosecurity Australia, the Department and our many stakeholders.
The updates in this Handbook reflect the interim arrangements for the coordination and delivery of
biosecurity services in Australia. The Handbook and the processes it describes will be kept under review.
We trust that this publication will assist your understanding of Australias approach to
quarantineand biosecurity and, specifically, the process Biosecurity Australia follows in
undertaking import risk analyses.
Dr Conall OConnell
Secretary
Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry
Colin Grant
Chief Executive
Biosecurity Australia
July 2009
3
Import Risk Analysis Handbook 2007
Contents
Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
2. Biosecurity framework . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
3. Managing import proposals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
4. The import risk analysis process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
5. Steps in an import risk analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
6. Determination by the Director of Animal and Plant Quarantine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
7. Steps that follow the IRA process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
5
Import Risk Analysis Handbook 2007
Introduction
1. Introduction
The Import Risk Analysis Handbook 2007 describes the process Australia follows in assessing
proposals to import animals, plants and/or other goods. It provides information about the risk
analysis process for import proposals, with particular emphasis on those analyses with regulated
steps under the Quarantine Regulations 2000.
The Handbook takes account of reforms to the import risk analysis process announced by the
Australian Government in October 2006.
Risk analysis plays an important part in Australias biosecurity protection. It assists the Australian
Government in considering the level of quarantine risk that may be associated with the importation
or proposed importation of animals, plants or other goods into Australia. If the risks are found to
exceed the level of quarantine risk that is acceptable to Australia, risk management measures are
proposed to reduce them to that level. If the quarantine risks cannot be reduced to an acceptable
level, trade will not be allowed.
Import risk analyses (IRAs) are risk analyses with key steps that are conducted under regulation.
They are conducted by Biosecurity Australia using technical and scientific experts in the relevant
fields and involving consultation with stakeholders.
Biosecurity Australia provides recommendations for animal and plant quarantine policy to
Australias Director of Animal and Plant Quarantine. The Director, or delegate, is responsible for
determining whether or not an importation can be permitted under the Quarantine Act 1908,
and if so, under what conditions. The Australian Quarantine and Inspection Service (AQIS) is
responsible for implementing appropriate risk management measures.
7
Import Risk Analysis Handbook 2007
Biosecurity framework
2. Biosecurity framework
2.1
The objective of Australias biosecurity policies and risk management measures is the prevention or
control of the entry, establishment or spread of pests and diseases that could cause significant harm
to people, animals, plants and other aspects of the environment.
Australia has diverse native flora and fauna and a large agricultural sector, and is relatively free from
the more significant pests and diseases present in other countries. Therefore, successive Australian
Governments have maintained a conservative, but not a zero-risk, approach to the management
of biosecurity risks. This approach is consistent with the World Trade Organizations (WTOs)
Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS Agreement) (see Annex 2).
Annex A of the SPS Agreement defines the concept of an appropriate level of protection (ALOP)
as the level of protection deemed appropriate by a WTO Member establishing a sanitary or
phytosanitary measure to protect human, animal or plant life or health within its territory. Among
a number of obligations, a WTO Member should take into account the objective of minimising
negative trade effects in setting its ALOP.
Like many other countries, Australia expresses its ALOP in qualitative terms. Our ALOP, which
reflects community expectations through Australian Government policy, is currently expressed as
providing a high level of sanitary and phytosanitary protection, aimed at reducing risk to a very low
level, but not to zero. Further detail on Australias ALOP is at Annex 3.
Consistent with the SPS Agreement (Article 5, paragraph 3), in conducting risk analyses Australia
takes into account as relevant economic factors:
the potential damage in terms of loss of production or sales in the event of the entry,
establishment or spread of a pest or disease in the territory of Australia
the costs of control or eradication of a pest or disease
the relative cost-effectiveness of alternative approaches to limiting risks.
8
Import Risk Analysis Handbook 2007
Biosecurity framework
2.2.1
The Australian Government Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry is responsible for the Australian Governments
animal and plant biosecurity policy development and the establishment of risk management measures. The Secretary of the
Department is appointed as the Director of Animal and Plant Quarantine under the Quarantine Act 1908 (the Act).
There are three groups within the Department primarily responsible for biosecurity and quarantine policy development
and implementation:
Biosecurity Australia conducts risk analyses, including IRAs, and develops recommendations for biosecurity policy
as well as providing quarantine advice to the Director of Animal and Plant Quarantine and AQIS
AQIS develops operational procedures, makes a range of quarantine decisions under the Act (including import permit
decisions under delegation from the Director of Animal and Plant Quarantine) and delivers quarantine services and
Product Integrity, Animal and Plant Health Division (PIAPH) coordinates pest and disease preparedness, emergency
responses and liaison on inter- and intra-state quarantine arrangements for the Australian Government, in
conjunction with Australias state and territory governments.
The Biosecurity Services Group (BSG) within the Department takes the lead in biosecurity and quarantine policy
development and the establishment and implementation of risk management measures across the biosecurity
continuum, and:
Pre-border conducts, through Biosecurity Australia, risk analyses, including IRAs, and develops recommendations
for biosecurity policy as well as providing quarantine policy advice to the Director of Animal and Plant Quarantine
At the border develops, through the Australian Quarantine and Inspection Service, operational procedures, makes
a range of quarantine decisions under the Act (including import permit decisions under delegation from the Director
of Animal and Plant Quarantine) and delivers quarantine services
Post-border coordinates pest and disease preparedness, emergency responses and liaison on inter- and
intra-state quarantine arrangements for the Australian Government, in conjunction with Australias state
andterritory governments.
2.2.2
State and territory governments play a vital role in the quarantine continuum. Biosecurity Australia and PIAPH BSG
work in partnership with state and territory governments to address regional differences in pest and disease status and
risk within Australia, and develop appropriate sanitary and phytosanitary measures to account for those differences.
Australias partnership approach to quarantine is supported by a formal Memorandum of Understanding that provides
for consultation between the Australian Government and the state and territory governments.
Depending on the nature of the good being imported or proposed for importation, Biosecurity Australia may consult
other Australian Government authorities or agencies in developing its recommendations and providing advice.
As well as a Director of Animal and Plant Quarantine, the Act provides for a Director of Human Quarantine. The
Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing is responsible for human health aspects of quarantine
and Australias Chief Medical Officer within that Department holds the position of Director of Human Quarantine.
Biosecurity Australia may, where appropriate, consult with that Department on relevant matters that may have
implications for human health.
The Act also requires the Director of Animal and Plant Quarantine, before making certain decisions, to request advice
from the Environment Minister and to take the advice into account when making those decisions. The Australian
Government Department of the Environment and Water Resources Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage
and the Arts (DEW DEWHA) is responsible under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999
for assessing the environmental impact associated with proposals to import live species. Anyone proposing to import such
material should contact DEW DEWHA directly for further information.
When undertaking risk analyses, Biosecurity Australia consults with DEW DEWHA about environmental issues and
may use or refer to DEWs DEWHAs assessment.
9
Import Risk Analysis Handbook 2007
Biosecurity framework
The Quarantine Regulations 2000 were amended in 2007 to regulate keys steps of the import risk
analysis process. The Regulations:
define both a standard and an expanded IRA
identify certain steps which must be included in each type of IRA
specify time limits for certain steps and overall timeframes for the completion of IRAs
(up to 24 months for a standard IRA and up to 30 months for an expanded IRA)
specify publication requirements
make provision for termination of an IRA
allow for a partially completed risk analysis to be completed as an IRA under the Regulations.
The Regulations are available at www.comlaw.gov.au.
10
Import Risk Analysis Handbook 2007
Biosecurity framework
2.4.1
Notification obligations
Under the transparency provisions of the SPS Agreement (Article 7 and Annex B), WTO Members
are required, among other things, to notify other members of proposed sanitary or phytosanitary
regulations, or changes to existing regulations, that are not substantially the same as the content of
an international standard and that may have a significant effect on trade of other WTO Members.
11
Import Risk Analysis Handbook 2007
An import proposal is a generic term used to describe a proposal to bring into Australia plants,
animals or other goods not imported previously, or not imported previously from the country or
region concerned. An import proposal is usually provided to Biosecurity Australia by exporting
country authorities, agencies or individual exporters requesting market access.
An import permit application received by AQIS for a good which has not been imported previously,
or not imported previously from the country or region concerned, may be referred to Biosecurity
Australia and lead to an import proposal.
3.3 Determining the need for, and type of, risk analysis
After receiving an import proposal, Biosecurity Australia will consider whether a new risk analysis
is required and, if so, whether there is sufficient information to proceed. If the required information
is not available, special surveys and monitoring may be needed. Without all relevant information, it
may not be possible for a risk analysis to be considered for Biosecurity Australias work program.
A risk analysis may also be undertaken when the risk profile of existing trade in a good, or of
apest or disease has changed or may change. Such a risk analysis is usually initiated within
theDepartment.
Where a risk analysis is required, the Chief Executive of Biosecurity Australia will determine if
it should be conducted as an import risk analysis with key steps regulated under the Quarantine
Regulations 2000. The criteria for conducting an IRA are outlined in section 4.1. A risk analysis
which does not meet the criteria for an IRA will be undertaken as a non-regulated analysis of
existing policy.
12
Import Risk Analysis Handbook 2007
13
Import Risk Analysis Handbook 2007
14
Import Risk Analysis Handbook 2007
Additionally, under the Regulations, certain periods of time may be disregarded in circumstances
where delays are not attributable to Biosecurity Australia (also known as a stop the clock
mechanism). The Chief Executive may choose to stop the clock in the following circumstances:
where the Chief Executive believes that further information is essential to complete an IRA and
that a proposer or another person can provide the information
where the Chief Executive believes that it is essential to undertake research, or to seek
substantial expert advice, to complete an IRA or
where a significant national or international quarantine circumstance exists that limits Biosecurity
Australias ability to complete an IRA within the time required under the Regulations.
If the Chief Executive stops the clock, Biosecurity Australia will issue a notice to this effect on its
website. The notice will state the reason for stopping the clock and when the IRA will restart.
4.6.1
Confidential submissions
Subject to the Freedom of Information Act 1982 and the Privacy Act 1988, all submissions received
will be publicly available and may be listed or referred to in documents and publications.
15
Import Risk Analysis Handbook 2007
Biosecurity Australia cannot guarantee the confidentiality of material provided to it in the IRA
process. Biosecurity Australias approach to confidentiality is detailed at Annex 9.
The contents of a submission will not be treated as confidential unless they are marked
confidential and they are capable of being classified as such in accordance with the
Freedom of Information Act 1982.
4.6.2
Public file
16
Import Risk Analysis Handbook 2007
Steps in an IRA
5.1
Biosecurity Australia will consult, whenever necessary, with the proposer, industry and other
stakeholders on the scope and approach of an IRA before the Chief Executive announces the
commencement of the regulated steps of the IRA. Consultation will extend to state and territory
governments, when necessary, and include discussion of regional differences in pest and disease
status and risk. Biosecurity Australia will also consult with the Australian Government Department
of the Environment and Water Resources Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and
the Arts and the Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing when necessary.
Standard IRA
Expanded IRA
An IRA will commence when the Chief Executive of Biosecurity Australia makes an
announcement to that effect. A Biosecurity Australia Advice (BAA) will be issued on the
Biosecurity Australia website to announce that an IRA has commenced and whether the IRA will
be undertaken as a standard or an expanded IRA. The BAA will also provide information on the
scope and approach of the IRA. If the risk analysis is to be conducted as an expanded IRA, the
BAA will state whether an issues paper will be produced.
This announcement triggers the start of the regulated timeframe for an IRA.
Standard IRA
Expanded IRA
An issues paper may be prepared as part of the expanded process if the Chief Executive of
Biosecurity Australia considers that significant issues need to be explored and raised formally with
stakeholders. Where most of this information is already available, the Chief Executive may decide
that an issues paper is not required.
Biosecurity Australia will advise stakeholders when an issues paper is placed on its website.
The issues paper may:
summarise background and administrative matters pertaining to the IRA
list the pests and diseases that Biosecurity Australia believes may be associated with the import
or proposed import
categorise pests and diseases according to whether they need to be considered in the subsequent
risk assessment and
outline additional tasks identified at this stage.
17
Import Risk Analysis Handbook 2007
Steps in an IRA
Standard IRA
Expanded IRA
If an issues paper is published, Biosecurity Australia will invite comment on the paper.
The Chief Executive of Biosecurity Australia will advise stakeholders of the deadline for
submissions. Under the Quarantine Regulations 2000, stakeholders will have up to 60 days to
submit written comments.
Biosecurity Australia may meet with stakeholders to discuss matters raised in their submissions.
Submissions received will be placed on the public file, unless they are marked confidential and
are capable of being classified as such in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act 1982.
Biosecurity Australias approach to confidentiality is explained further at Annex 9.
Standard IRA
Expanded IRA
Biosecurity Australia will conduct its risk analysis with whatever input is needed from specialists,
taking into account information gained from consultation with stakeholders, and prepare a draft
IRA report.
The draft IRA report will:
confirm the pests and diseases being assessed
describe the major pathways by which Biosecurity Australia considers these could enter,
establish or spread in Australia
for each pest and disease on identified pathways, determine the likelihood of its entry,
establishment or spread, and the harm (consequences) that could result
specify whether the resulting risks exceed Australias ALOP
in cases where the risks exceed Australias ALOP, identify potential risk management measures
and determine whether application of the measures could reduce the risks to achieve Australias
ALOP and
include a preliminary view of the preferred options for risk management.
Relevant state and territory government agencies will be consulted on regional pest and disease
status and risk.
Standard IRA
Expanded IRA
Biosecurity Australia will issue a draft IRA report to present the results of the risk analysis, taking
into account all relevant input received. Biosecurity Australia will announce that a draft IRA report
has been placed on its website and invite comment on the draft IRA report.
Biosecurity Australia will also place the draft IRA report on the public file.
18
Import Risk Analysis Handbook 2007
Steps in an IRA
The Chief Executive of Biosecurity Australia will inform stakeholders of the deadline for
submissions. Under the Regulations, stakeholders will have up to 60 days to submit written
comments on a draft IRA report.
Biosecurity Australia may meet with stakeholders to discuss the draft IRA report.
If the Chief Executive of Biosecurity Australia considers stakeholders may not have reasonable
opportunity to comment on the draft IRA report within the normal consultation period, the
Regulations provide for a single extension to the timeframe of up to 60 days.
Submissions received will be placed on the public file, unless they are marked confidential and
are capable of being classified as such in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act 1982.
Biosecurity Australias approach to confidentiality is explained further at Annex 9.
The Department will notify the WTO Secretariat of the draft IRA report. The notification
willinclude the date by which comments should be provided.
Standard IRA
Expanded IRA
Biosecurity Australia will consider submissions received on a draft IRA report and may consult
informally with stakeholders. Biosecurity Australia may revise the draft IRA report as appropriate.
Standard IRA
Expanded IRA
The Eminent Scientists Group (ESG) is a high level review group, independent of Biosecurity
Australia, that is tasked with providing external scientific and economic scrutiny of expanded
IRAs.
The role of the ESG is to review the draft IRA report, as revised by Biosecurity Australia after
consideration of stakeholder comments, prior to its publication. The ESGs review will take account of any
relevant new information brought to its attention, and assess conflicting scientific views, to ensure that:
all submissions received from stakeholders in response to the draft IRA report have been
properly considered
all relevant matters relating to the likely economic consequences of a pest or disease incursion
have been properly considered and
the conclusions of the revised draft IRA report are scientifically reasonable, based on the
material presented.
As part of this review, the Chairman of the ESG may co-opt additional expertise or seek advice to
assist the ESG in meeting its terms of reference. The ESG may consult with Biosecurity Australia
and with stakeholders during its review.
The ESG will prepare a report to the Director of Animal and Plant Quarantine on its findings
and recommend any action to overcome any identified deficiencies. The Regulations set out a
maximum timeframe of 60 days for the ESG to provide its report to the Director of Animal and
Plant Quarantine.
The ESGs report will be provided to the Chief Executive of Biosecurity Australia and will
subsequently be publicly released.
The ESGs terms of reference are at Annex 5.
19
Import Risk Analysis Handbook 2007
Steps in an IRA
Standard IRA
Expanded IRA
Biosecurity Australia will prepare a provisional final IRA report, taking into account stakeholder
comments and, in the case of expanded IRAs, any recommendations made by the ESG.
In considering the recommendations in the provisional final IRA report, the Chief Executive of
Biosecurity Australia must be satisfied that, in his or her opinion, the IRA has been conducted
in accordance with the Regulations and the process described in this Handbook, and that the
recommendations:
are reasonable, in the light of the evidence
meet the Government's objectives for biosecurity
are consistent with Australian legislation
accord with Australias international rights and obligations.
Before the provisional final IRA report is published, Biosecurity Australia will consult with state
and territory governments on the proposed outcomes of the IRA. This consultation will include,
for example, issues of regional pest status and risk, and aspects of joint responsibility arising from
the IRAs recommendations.
Biosecurity Australia will announce that a provisional final IRA report has been placed on the
Biosecurity Australia website. Biosecurity Australia will also distribute the provisional final IRA
report to the proposer and registered stakeholders together with the ESG report and any response
by Biosecurity Australia to the ESGs report. These documents will also be placed on the public file.
The regulated timeframe for an IRA ends when a provisional final IRA report is issued.
21
Import Risk Analysis Handbook 2007
The risk management measures recommended in risk analysis, including import risk analyses,
often become conditions imposed on import permits granted by the Director of Animal and Plant
Quarantine, or delegate, to limit the level of quarantine risk to an acceptably low level. In some
cases the recommended measures require arrangements that extend beyond the scope of conditions
on an import permit. For example, an IRA might identify risk management measures that require
preparatory work to be undertaken by the Competent Authority of the exporting country before
trade can commence.
Where necessary, AQIS will work with the Competent Authority of the exporting country, in
consultation with Biosecurity Australia, to ensure that the Competent Authority develops an
operational work plan and implements the risk management measures recommended in an IRA.
7.2
The Director of Animal and Plant Quarantine may delegate the power to grant import permits
under the quarantine proclamations to a quarantine officer or another officer appointed under the
Quarantine Act 1908.
When a completed valid application for an import permit has been received, along with any
required fees, the Director of Animal and Plant Quarantine or delegate:
must consider the level of quarantine risk if the permit were granted and
must consider whether, if the permit were granted, the imposition of conditions would be
necessary to limit the level of quarantine risk to one that is acceptably low and
for a permit to import a seed of a plant that was produced by genetic manipulation must take
into account any risk assessment prepared, and any decision made, in relation to the seed under
the Gene Technology Act and
may take into account anything else that he or she knows is relevant.
In considering the level of quarantine risk and whether conditions should be imposed to limit
the quarantine risk to an acceptably low level, the Director of Animal and Plant Quarantine, or
delegate, may take into account any relevant information, including an IRA.
If the Director of Animal and Plant Quarantine, or delegate, is satisfied that an import permit can
be granted, he or she provides the applicant with a copy of the permit. Any conditions that apply to
the permit are recorded on the permit.
If the Director of Animal and Plant Quarantine, or delegate, decides that the imposition of
conditions would not limit the quarantine risk to an acceptably low level, he or she must refuse to
grant the import permit. The Director of Animal and Plant Quarantine, or delegate, advises the
applicant in writing of the reasons for refusing to grant the import permit.
22
Import Risk Analysis Handbook 2007
Annex 1
DEWHA
23
Import Risk Analysis Handbook 2007
Annex 2
In this Agreement, reference to Article XX(b) includes also the chapeau of that Article.
24
Import Risk Analysis Handbook 2007
Annex 2
Article 3 Harmonization
1. To harmonize sanitary and phytosanitary measures on as wide a basis as possible, Members
shall base their sanitary or phytosanitary measures on international standards, guidelines or
recommendations, where they exist, except as otherwise provided for in this Agreement, and in
particular in paragraph 3.
2. Sanitary or phytosanitary measures which conform to international standards, guidelines or
recommendations shall be deemed to be necessary to protect human, animal or plant life or
health, and presumed to be consistent with the relevant provisions of this Agreement and of
GATT 1994.
3. Members may introduce or maintain sanitary or phytosanitary measures which result in a
higher level of sanitary or phytosanitary protection than would be achieved by measures based
on the relevant international standards, guidelines or recommendations, if there is a scientific
justification, or as a consequence of the level of sanitary or phytosanitary protection a Member
determines to be appropriate in accordance with the relevant provisions of paragraphs 1 through
8 of Article 5.2 Notwithstanding the above, all measures which result in a level of sanitary or
phytosanitary protection different from that which would be achieved by measures based on
international standards, guidelines or recommendations shall not be inconsistent with any other
provision of this Agreement.
For the purposes of paragraph 3 of Article 3, there is a scientific justification if, on the basis of an examination and evaluation of available
scientific information in conformity with the relevant provisions of this Agreement, a Member determines that the relevant international
standards, guidelines or recommendations are not sufficient to achieve its appropriate level of sanitary or phytosanitary protection.
25
Annex 2
4. Members shall play a full part, within the limits of their resources, in the relevant international
organizations and their subsidiary bodies, in particular the Codex Alimentarius Commission,
the International Office of Epizootics, and the international and regional organizations
operating within the framework of the International Plant Protection Convention, to promote
within these organizations the development and periodic review of standards, guidelines and
recommendations with respect to all aspects of sanitary and phytosanitary measures.
5. The Committee on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures provided for in paragraphs 1 and 4
of Article 12 (referred to in this Agreement as the Committee) shall develop a procedure to
monitor the process of international harmonization and coordinate efforts in this regard with
the relevant international organizations.
Article 4 Equivalence
1. Members shall accept the sanitary or phytosanitary measures of other Members as equivalent,
even if these measures differ from their own or from those used by other Members trading in
the same product, if the exporting Member objectively demonstrates to the importing Member
that its measures achieve the importing Members appropriate level of sanitary or phytosanitary
protection. For this purpose, reasonable access shall be given, upon request, to the importing
Member for inspection, testing and other relevant procedures.
2. Members shall, upon request, enter into consultations with the aim of achieving bilateral
andmultilateral agreements on recognition of the equivalence of specified sanitary or
phytosanitary measures.
Annex 2
Article 7 Transparency
Members shall notify changes in their sanitary or phytosanitary measures and shall provide
information on their sanitary or phytosanitary measures in accordance with the provisions of Annex B.
For purposes of paragraph 6 of Article 5, a measure is not more trade-restrictive than required unless there is another measure,
reasonably available taking into account technical and economic feasibility, that achieves the appropriate level of sanitary or
phytosanitary protection and is significantly less restrictive to trade.
27
Annex 2
Annex 2
2. The Committee shall encourage and facilitate ad hoc consultations or negotiations among
Members on specific sanitary or phytosanitary issues. The Committee shall encourage the use
of international standards, guidelines or recommendations by all Members and, in this regard,
shall sponsor technical consultation and study with the objective of increasing coordination and
integration between international and national systems and approaches for approving the use of
food additives or for establishing tolerances for contaminants in foods, beverages or feedstuffs.
3. The Committee shall maintain close contact with the relevant international organizations
in the field of sanitary and phytosanitary protection, especially with the Codex Alimentarius
Commission, the International Office of Epizootics, and the Secretariat of the International
Plant Protection Convention, with the objective of securing the best available scientific
and technical advice for the administration of this Agreement and in order to ensure that
unnecessary duplication of effort is avoided.
4. The Committee shall develop a procedure to monitor the process of international
harmonization and the use of international standards, guidelines or recommendations. For this
purpose, the Committee should, in conjunction with the relevant international organizations,
establish a list of international standards, guidelines or recommendations relating to sanitary
or phytosanitary measures which the Committee determines to have a major trade impact. The
list should include an indication by Members of those international standards, guidelines or
recommendations which they apply as conditions for import or on the basis of which imported
products conforming to these standards can enjoy access to their markets. For those cases
in which a Member does not apply an international standard, guideline or recommendation
as a condition for import, the Member should provide an indication of the reason therefore,
and, in particular, whether it considers that the standard is not stringent enough to provide
the appropriate level of sanitary or phytosanitary protection. If a Member revises its position,
following its indication of the use of a standard, guideline or recommendation as a condition
for import, it should provide an explanation for its change and so inform the Secretariat as well
as the relevant international organizations, unless such notification and explanation is given
according to the procedures of Annex B.
5. In order to avoid unnecessary duplication, the Committee may decide, as appropriate, to use the
information generated by the procedures, particularly for notification, which are in operation in
the relevant international organizations.
6. The Committee may, on the basis of an initiative from one of the Members, through
appropriate channels invite the relevant international organizations or their subsidiary bodies to
examine specific matters with respect to a particular standard, guideline or recommendation,
including the basis of explanations for non-use given according to paragraph 4.
7. The Committee shall review the operation and implementation of this Agreement three years
after the date of entry into force of the WTO Agreement, and thereafter as the need arises.
Where appropriate, the Committee may submit to the Council for Trade in Goods proposals
to amend the text of this Agreement having regard, inter alia, to the experience gained in its
implementation.
29
Import Risk Analysis Handbook 2007
Annex 2
Inaddition, Members shall not take measures which have the effect of, directly or indirectly,
requiring or encouraging such regional or non-governmental entities, or local governmental bodies,
to act in a manner inconsistent with the provisions of this Agreement. Members shall ensure that
they rely on the services of non-governmental entities for implementing sanitary or phytosanitary
measures only if these entities comply with the provisions of this Agreement.
Annex A Definitions4
1. Sanitary or phytosanitary measure Any measure applied:
(a) to protect animal or plant life or health within the territory of the Member from risks arising
from the entry, establishment or spread of pests, diseases, disease-carrying organisms or
disease-causing organisms;
(b) to protect human or animal life or health within the territory of the Member from risks
arising from additives, contaminants, toxins or disease-causing organisms in foods,
beveragesor feedstuffs;
(c) to protect human life or health within the territory of the Member from risks arising from
diseases carried by animals, plants or products thereof, or from the entry, establishment or
spread of pests; or
(d) to prevent or limit other damage within the territory of the Member from the entry,
establishment or spread of pests.
Sanitary or phytosanitary measures include all relevant laws, decrees, regulations, requirements
and procedures including, inter alia, end product criteria; processes and production methods;
testing, inspection, certification and approval procedures; quarantine treatments including
relevant requirements associated with the transport of animals or plants, or with the materials
necessary for their survival during transport; provisions on relevant statistical methods,
sampling procedures and methods of risk assessment; and packaging and labelling requirements
directly related to food safety.
For the purpose of these definitions, animal includes fish and wild fauna; plant includes forests and wild flora; pests include
weeds; and contaminants include pesticide and veterinary drug residues and extraneous matter.
30
Import Risk Analysis Handbook 2007
Annex 2
(c) for plant health, the international standards, guidelines and recommendations developed
under the auspices of the Secretariat of the International Plant Protection Convention
in cooperation with regional organizations operating within the framework of the
InternationalPlant Protection Convention; and
(d) for matters not covered by the above organizations, appropriate standards, guidelines and
recommendations promulgated by other relevant international organizations open for
membership to all Members, as identified by the Committee.
4. Risk assessment - The evaluation of the likelihood of entry, establishment or spread of a pest or
disease within the territory of an importing Member according to the sanitary or phytosanitary
measures which might be applied, and of the associated potential biological and economic
consequences; or the evaluation of the potential for adverse effects on human or animal health
arising from the presence of additives, contaminants, toxins or disease-causing organisms in
food, beverages or feedstuffs.
5. Appropriate level of sanitary or phytosanitary protection - The level of protection deemed
appropriate by the Member establishing a sanitary or phytosanitary measure to protect human,
animal or plant life or health within its territory.
NOTE: Many Members otherwise refer to this concept as the acceptable level of risk.
6. Pest- or disease-free area - An area, whether all of a country, part of a country, or all or parts of
several countries, as identified by the competent authorities, in which a specific pest or disease
does not occur.
NOTE: A pest- or disease-free area may surround, be surrounded by, or be adjacent to an area
- whether within part of a country or in a geographic region which includes parts of or all of
several countries -in which a specific pest or disease is known to occur but is subject to regional
control measures such as the establishment of protection, surveillance and buffer zones which
will confine or eradicate the pest or disease in question.
7. Area of low pest or disease prevalence - An area, whether all of a country, part of a country, or
all or parts of several countries, as identified by the competent authorities, in which a specific
pest or disease occurs at low levels and which is subject to effective surveillance, control or
eradication measures.
Sanitary and phytosanitary measures such as laws, decrees or ordinances which are applicable generally.
31
Import Risk Analysis Handbook 2007
Annex 2
(a) any sanitary or phytosanitary regulations adopted or proposed within its territory;
(b) any control and inspection procedures, production and quarantine treatment, pesticide
tolerance and food additive approval procedures, which are operated within its territory;
(c) risk assessment procedures, factors taken into consideration, as well as the determination of
the appropriate level of sanitary or phytosanitary protection;
(d) the membership and participation of the Member, or of relevant bodies within its territory,
in international and regional sanitary and phytosanitary organizations and systems, as
well as in bilateral and multilateral agreements and arrangements within the scope of this
Agreement, and the texts of such agreements and arrangements.
4. Members shall ensure that where copies of documents are requested by interested Members,
they are supplied at the same price (if any), apart from the cost of delivery, as to the nationals6
ofthe Member concerned.
Notification procedures
5. Whenever an international standard, guideline or recommendation does not exist or the content
of a proposed sanitary or phytosanitary regulation is not substantially the same as the content
of an international standard, guideline or recommendation, and if the regulation may have a
significant effect on trade of other Members, Members shall:
(a) publish a notice at an early stage in such a manner as to enable interested Members to
become acquainted with the proposal to introduce a particular regulation;
(b) notify other Members, through the Secretariat, of the products to be covered by the
regulation together with a brief indication of the objective and rationale of the proposed
regulation. Such notifications shall take place at an early stage, when amendments can still
be introduced and comments taken into account;
(c) provide upon request to other Members copies of the proposed regulation and, whenever
possible, identify the parts which in substance deviate from international standards,
guidelines or recommendations;
(d) without discrimination, allow reasonable time for other Members to make comments in
writing, discuss these comments upon request, and take the comments and the results of the
discussions into account.
6. However, where urgent problems of health protection arise or threaten to arise for a Member,
that Member may omit such of the steps enumerated in paragraph 5 of this Annex as it finds
necessary, provided that the Member:
(a) immediately notifies other Members, through the Secretariat, of the particular regulation
and the products covered, with a brief indication of the objective and the rationale of the
regulation, including the nature of the urgent problem(s);
(b) provides, upon request, copies of the regulation to other Members;
(c) allows other Members to make comments in writing, discusses these comments upon
request, and takes the comments and the results of the discussions into account.
7. Notifications to the Secretariat shall be in English, French or Spanish.
8. Developed country Members shall, if requested by other Members, provide copies of the
documents or, in case of voluminous documents, summaries of the documents covered by a
specific notification in English, French or Spanish.
9. The Secretariat shall promptly circulate copies of the notification to all Members and interested
international organizations and draw the attention of developing country Members to any
notifications relating to products of particular interest to them.
6
32
When nationals are referred to in this Agreement, the term shall be deemed, in the case of a separate customs territory Member
of the WTO, to mean persons, natural or legal, who are domiciled or who have a real and effective industrial or commercial
establishment in that customs territory.
Annex 2
10. Members shall designate a single central government authority as responsible for the
implementation, on the national level, of the provisions concerning notification procedures
according to paragraphs 5, 6, 7 and 8 of this Annex.
General reservations
11. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as requiring:
(a) the provision of particulars or copies of drafts or the publication of texts other than in the
language of the Member except as stated in paragraph 8 of this Annex; or
(b) Members to disclose confidential information which would impede enforcement of sanitary
or phytosanitary legislation or which would prejudice the legitimate commercial interests of
particular enterprises.
Control, inspection and approval procedures include, inter alia, procedures for sampling, testing and certification.
33
Import Risk Analysis Handbook 2007
Annex 2
Where an importing Member operates a system for the approval of the use of food additives or for
the establishment of tolerances for contaminants in food, beverages or feedstuffs which prohibits
or restricts access to its domestic markets for products based on the absence of an approval, the
importing Member shall consider the use of a relevant international standard as the basis for access
until a final determination is made.
2. Where a sanitary or phytosanitary measure specifies control at the level of production, the
Member in whose territory the production takes place shall provide the necessary assistance to
facilitate such control and the work of the controlling authorities.
3. Nothing in this Agreement shall prevent Members from carrying out reasonable inspection
within their own territories.
34
Import Risk Analysis Handbook 2007
Annex 3
35
Import Risk Analysis Handbook 2007
Annex 4
36
Import Risk Analysis Handbook 2007
Annex 4
Consultation
The IMAAG may consult relevant parties when assigning priorities. These parties might include other
areas within the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, state and territory governments,
other relevant domestic and international government agencies and relevant industry bodies.
Membership
Chairman:
Members:
Meeting arrangements
The IMAAG will meet every three months or as soon as possible after receiving advice that
apriority allocation is required for an import proposal.
Secretariat
Secretariat services to the IMAAG will be provided by an area of the Department separate
toBiosecurity Australia.
Public communication
The IMAAGs terms of reference, membership and advice to Biosecurity Australia will
bepublished on the Departments website.
Biosecurity Australia publishes its work program on its website.
37
Import Risk Analysis Handbook 2007
Annex 5
38
Import Risk Analysis Handbook 2007
Annex 6
Membership
An IRAAP is not a single ongoing panel. It is convened, as appropriate, for the purpose of
considering appeals relating to a particular provisional final IRA report.
An IRAAP will be chaired by the Chairman of the Quarantine and Exports Advisory Council
Biosecurity Advisory Council (QEAC BAC). An IRAAP comprises three members:
Chairman of QEAC BAC
one other member of QEAC BAC
a senior officer from the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry.
The IRAAP Chairman nominates the QEAC BAC member of an IRAAP. The Secretary of the
Department nominates the senior departmental member of an IRAAP.
Membership of an IRAAP is subject to conflict of interest considerations. Each potential member
of an IRAAP declares any potential conflict of interest or any possible perception of bias that could
prevent them from participating in a particular appeal. If this declaration raises concerns about
whether the Chairman or member should participate in the appeal, the Chairman, in consultation
with the Secretary of the Department, nominates an alternative member.
39
Import Risk Analysis Handbook 2007
Annex 6
Operating procedures
When a provisional final IRA report is issued by Biosecurity Australia, the IRAAP secretariat
willinform the Chairman of QEAC BAC, confirm his or her availability to chair an IRAAP
should one be required, seek information on any potential conflict of interest and provide advice on
theIRAAP process.
If one or more appeals are received by the closing date, the IRAAP Chairman will consider
theappeals received and in each case decide whether the statement of reasons provides evidence
warranting consideration by an IRAAP.
The secretariat will advise the appellant(s) and the Chief Executive of Biosecurity Australia of the
Chairmans decision on whether the appeal(s) warrant consideration by an IRAAP. Biosecurity
Australia will inform registered stakeholders of the Chairmans decision.
The IRAAP will consider the appeal(s) and deliver a finding or series of findings in relation to
eachappeal. The IRAAPs findings will fall into one or more of the following categories:
outside the ground for appeal
allowed
disallowed.
The IRAAP will not consider verbal submissions from appellants unless they are determined by
theIRAAP to be necessary to supplement an appellants written submission.
An appeal outcome requires majority support.
The IRAAP will report its findings to the appellant(s) and the Director of Animal and Plant
Quarantine within 45 days of the closing date for appeals.
If an appeal is allowed, the IRAAP may offer advice to the Chief Executive of Biosecurity
Australiaon ways of overcoming any identified deficiencies.
40
Import Risk Analysis Handbook 2007
Annex 7
41
Import Risk Analysis Handbook 2007
Annex 7
Biosecurity Australia will determine when there is sufficient information to proceed with a risk
analysis. If the required information is not available, special surveys and monitoring may be
needed. Without all relevant information, it will not be possible for a risk analysis to be considered
for Biosecurity Australias active work program.
42
Import Risk Analysis Handbook 2007
Annex 8
43
Import Risk Analysis Handbook 2007
Annex 9
44
Import Risk Analysis Handbook 2007
Annex 10
Annex 11
Annex 11
appropriate level of
protection (ALOP)
AQIS
biosecurity
Biosecurity Advisory
Council (BAC)
Chief Executive
Competent Authority
ESG
good
Handbook
46
Import Risk Analysis Handbook 2007
Annex 11
IMAAG
import proposal
IPPC
IRAAP
non-regulated analysis
OIE
proposer
risk analysis
Secretary
SPS Agreement
stakeholders
WHO
WTO
47
Import Risk Analysis Handbook 2007