Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Economic Regulation
Performance Indicators
Aims to ensure..
Economic Regulation
Form of government
intervention to address
inefficiencies
arising
from
monopolistic
markets e.g. natural
monopoly sectors of
electricity transmission
and distribution
A
substitute
for
competition
where
competition
is
not
possible
1 2
4 3
Self Regulation
Imposition of standards backed up by legal sanctions if the standards are not met
Law is used to define and prohibit certain types of activity or force certain types of action
Advantages
Disadvantages
Regulator constrain a firms monopoly pricing behavior by specifying the maximum rate of return
If the actual revenue earned by the utility firm in the year is too low to meet the specified rate of
return, the regulated price will be adjusted upward for the following year and vice versa
Advantages
Disadvantages
3. Self Regulation
It often takes the form of a business or a trade association developing its own rules of
performance, which it also monitors and enforces
Some government oversight of the regulation, but as a rule self-regulation is often seen as a way
of business taking pre-emptive to avoid government intervention
Advantages
Disadvantages
Could be self-serving/undemocratic
Weak enforcement
Market based regulations can prove cost-effective, and minimize regulatory interference in the
day-to-day operation of companies
Advantages
Disadvantages
Firms respond
bureaucrats
Flexibility
to
market
not
Depends a
information
lot
in
reliability
of
Economic Regulation
Performance Indicators
10
RIGs
2012
11
Regulated by
Customers
Fair, affordable and
transparent tariff
Efficient cost
Guidelines
Ensure affordability to
Rakyat
Tariff which stimulates
economic growth
Ensure sustainability of
the electricity supply
industry
TNB
Fair return on investment
Incentive to operate
efficiently
Incentive for excellent
performance
12
Operational
Efficiencies
- Rewarded for
seeking efficiencies
in operational &
capital expenditure
Financial
Efficiencies
- Rewarded for
maintaining an
efficient capital
structure.
Performance
Efficiencies
- Rewarded for
delivering
improvements in
network
performance.
13
Performance Based
Regulation
Performance Based
Regulation
Cost-plus
No IBR
Sweden
Finland
Myanmar
Norway
Estonia
Latvia
Lithuania
Thailand
Laos
Denmark
Philippines
Ireland
Netherlands
Vietnam
U.K.
Germany*
Poland
Cambodia
Belgium
Luxembourg
Czech R.
Austria
France
Malaysia
Hungary
Romania
Singapore
Slovenia
Monaco
Portugal2
Brunei
Slovakia
Bulgaria
Italy
Indonesia
Spain
Malta2
Greece
IBR is an improvement over the cost plus model as it enables tracking of efficiencies and costs
IBR applies to natural monopoly parts of the power sector such as transmission and distribution networks
Source: McKinsey
14
Before IBR
sen/kWh
(+14.89%)
Announcement Date
24 May 2006
5 June 2008
12 Feb 2009
30 May 2011
2 Dec 2013
11 Feb 2015
Effective Date
1 June 2006
1 July 2008
1 Mar 2009
1 June 2011
1 Jan 2014
1 Mar 2015
Quantum
12%
24%
(3.7%)
7.1%
14.89%
6.40
14.31
10.70
13.70
15.20
15.20
26.2
32.5
31.31
33.54
38.53
38.53
(2.25)
ICPT (sen/kWh)
Before IBR
After IBR
ICPT
Base
Tariff
Regulatory
Implementation
Guidelines
(RIGs)(RIGs)
Regulatory
Implementation
Guidelines
RIG
Description
Establishment of WACC
10
11
Electricity
Customers
Electricity Tariff
Customer
Services
Generation
Tariff
Transmission
Tariff
Transmission
System
Operations
Tariff
System
Operations
Single Buyer
SLAs and merit
order dispatch
TNB Generation
Flow
of
Funds
Independent Power
Producer (IPPs)
Managed Market Model
17
TNB Generation
Includes the ownership, management and operation of generation plants owned by TNB
TNB Generation contracts with the Single Buyer for the sale of electricity based on SLAs
Transmission
Includes the management, maintenance and development of the TNB transmission system for the
transmission of electricity to end customers
Includes the management, maintenance and development of the distribution system and the sale of
electricity to customers
18
There are 3 choices for setting the tariffs for the five (5) TNB BEs. The choices as per below:
i.
Revenue Cap
ii.
Price Cap
iii. Actual Cost
ST recommended a Regulatory Term of three (3) years (i.e. First Regulatory term 2015 2017)
What it is
Revenue Cap
Price Cap
Actual Cost
TNB
Business
Entities
Customer Services
Transmission
System Operations
19
To establish the
revenue requirement
(RR) principles for
each of the 5
regulated business
entities (i.e. GS, Tx,
CS, SB & SO)
To establish the
incentive framework
for the 5 regulated
business entities
Implementation Process
Submission needs to be
provided 10 months prior to
the next regulatory period
(submission in Feb17 for
regulatory period Jan18)
20
Annual
Revenue
Requirement
*
Return on
Regulatory
Asset Base
(RAB) @
WACC
Operating
Costs
Efficiency
Carryover
Amounts
Tax
Payments
Depreciation
Item
Definition
Operating Costs
Return on
Regulatory
Asset Base
(RAB)
Depreciation
Annual depreciation forecasts of the assets are computed based on a straight line basis with reference to its
estimated useful life
Tax Payments
Based on the calculation of taxable income and the applicable tax rates
Capital allowances are based on the applicable capital allowances rates as per the current and relevant
Malaysia Tax Guide
Efficiency
Carryover
Amounts
Base Incentive to retain variance between actual Opex and Capex relative to forecasts
Efficiency Carryover Scheme to provide a continuous and sustained incentive to pursue efficiencies over
Regulatory Term
* Calculation of Annual RR is done via Revenue Requirement (RR) Model Provided by Energy Commission
Source : Electricity Tariff RIGs, Suruhanjya Tenaga, Jan 2012
21
Revenue
Required
Revenue requirement
calculation over a (3
year) Regulatory Term
WACC
Operating
Costs
Tax
Payments
Efficiency
Carryover
Regulated
Asset Base
(RAB)
Return on
Assets
Depreciation
Applicable to:
System Operations
Transmission
Customer Services
22
Revenue
Required
WACC
X
Regulated
Asset Base
(RAB)
SB Generation
Costs
(Actual Costs)
Depreciation
Tax
Payments
Efficiency
Carryover
Return on
Assets
23
WACC
The forecast market return is set as the nominal after tax weighted average cost of
capital (WACC). Is discussed comprehensively in RIG 4.
X
Regulated Asset
Base (RAB)
Return on Assets
New
Investment
Construction work in
progress
Existing
Assets
Capital
Contribution
RAB
25
WACC is the economic cost (return) associated with a firm's requirement for capitali.e. suppliers of capital require a
market return on capital provided
Under the IBR mechanism, TNB is allowed to earn a rate of return at least equal to the WACC
WACC will provide an efficient return to the regulated entities and deliver efficient prices to customers. ST will ensure
WACC for the TNB BEs :
based on an efficient capital structure and credit rating
reflects market based returns on debt and equity
adequately reflects regulatory and market risk; and
there is consistency between all the WACC parameters and the underlying cash flows calculated in the
determining the ARR for the relevant TNB BEs
Breakdown of Parameters for WACC determination
Market Risk Premium
4.8 %
Cost of
Equity
x
Equity Beta
1.435
Cost of Equity
10.85%
Weighted Cost of
Equity 4.88%
+
Risk Free Rate
4.0%
Cost of
Debt
+
Debt Margin
2.24%
Levered Company
Cost of Debt 6.24%
x 0.45
Weighted Cost of
Debt
2.57%
WACC
7.5%
x 0.55
26
11.30%
France
Ireland
7.00%
7.50%
Brazil
8.67%
7.50%
Malaysia
8.55%
7.15%
7.90%
9.80%
7.13%
Russia
Hungary
Chile
Poland
Source: McKinsey
Philippines
Germany
Developed countries
Emerging markets
27
Incentive slope
Penalty slope
28
Transmission
System
Operator
Code
Performance Indicator
CSPI1
SAIDI
Weightage
(%)
50
CSPI2
25
CSPI3
25
TXPI1
TXPI2
TXPI3
System Minutes
System Availability
Project Delivery Index
100
40
30
30
100
SOPI1
25
SOPI2.1
25
SOPI2.2
25
SOPI3
Dispatch Adjusment
SBP1
SBPI2
Single Buyer
SBPI3
SBPI4
25
100
25
25
25
25
100
Note:
MSL: Minimum Service Level
GSL: Guaranteed Service Level
29
The costs that a regulated entity incurs in the provision of regulated services can be
broadly categorised into either direct costs or joint costs
Direct costs
Joint costs
30
Adjustment in
the following 6
month period
Formula: FCPT
(gas and coal
only)
Adjustment in
the following 6
month period
Formula: Actual
revenue based on
Generation Specific
Cost = Actual cost of
generation
Changes in:
31
Customer
Utility
Regulator/Government
Simulate a competitive
environment for natural
monopoly sectors
Transparency in cost
components of the electricity
value chain
32
Economic Regulation
Performance Indicators
33
Forecasted
Total Annual
Revenue
Requirement
Generation
Specific
Forecasted
Revenue
Requirement
Total
Average
Electricity
Tariff
Generation
Specific Tariff
Single
Buyer
Operations
Forecasted
Revenue
Requirement
Single Buyer
Tariff
Transmission
Forecasted
Revenue
Requirement
Transmission
Tariff
System
Operator
Forecasted
Revenue
Requirement
System
Operator
Tariff
Customer
Services
Forecasted
Revenue
Requirement
Customer
Services
Tariff
34
sen/kWh
+ ICPT
ICP
+ICP
ICPT
- ICPT
ICPT
- ICPT
Base
Tariff
Fixed Cost
2014
Development
Operation
Maintenance
2015
2016
2017
35
Fuel Component
Unit Price
RM15.20/mmBTU
for gas volume 1,000 mmscfd
RM41.68/mmBTU
for gas volume > 1,000 mmscfd
Imported Coal
USD87.50/MT
At exchange rate 1 USD = RM 3.1
(RM 271.25/MT)
Notes:
mmBTU = million British thermal unit
mmscfd = million standard cubic feet per day
MT = metric tonne
36
38.53
Generation costs
26.39
68.5%
0.19
0.05
3.66
Subject to 6-monthly
revision to reflect
changes in fuel and
generation costs
ICPT
37
38.53
Source of tariff increase 2014, sen/kWh
3.92
Piped gas
14.89%
4.99 sen/kWh
LNG
33.54
2013
Percentage of
increase
Gas price
78.6%
LNG:
RM41.68/mmBTU
Piped gas:
increased to
RM15.20/mmBTU
from
RM13.70/mmBTU
Coal
3.4%
Non-Fuel
18%
2014
The bulk of the
increase was due
to the removal of
gas subsidies
and introduction
of LNG at market
price
38
Economic Regulation
Performance Indicators
39
2014
Jan
Jul
Jun Jul
2016
Dec Jan
Jun Jul
Base Tariff
38.53 sen/kWh
2.25
sen/kWh
rebate
2.25
sen/kWh
rebate
1.52
sen/kWh
rebate
(726.99)
RM/mn
(1,085.67)
RM mn
(762.03)
RM mn
Imported LNG
RM 41.68/mmBTU
Imported Coal
2017
Dec Jan
Jun Jul
Dec
RM 2.57 billion
Total ICPT rebate passed through up
to June 2016
RM 271.25/MT
Domestic
Piped Gas
RM 15.20/mmBTU
40
Imported LNG
RM 41.68/mmBTU
RM 31.32/mmBTU
Generation &
Fuel
Cost Savings
Domestic
Piped Gas
Subsidy
Rationalisation
ICPT
Jan-Jun 2016
Base Tariff
38.53 sen/kWh
Imported Coal
RM 271.25/MT
Rebate of
1.52 sen/kWh
+ RM 560 mn
RM 15.20/mmBTU
The cost savings of RM 762 million has resulted in the electricity tariff rebate of
1.52 sen/kWh for Jan Jun 2016
41
Domestic
ICPT
1.52
Commercial
sen/kWh
REBATE
Savings*
Impact
4.58
per month
From RM
sen/kWh
Industrial
sen/kWh
1.52 REBATE
1.52 REBATE
Savings*
Savings*
Up to
4.0 %
All customers
Up to
5.1 %
All customers
Subsidies
Note:
* Savings in electricity bill due to ICPT rebate as compared to Base Tariff set in 1st January 2014
42
Economic Regulation
Performance Indicators
43
G
T
D
44
Incentive slope
Penalty slope
Note:
For Trial and RP1 (2014-2017), PIs are only monitored by ST with
no monetary impact
45
Business
Customer
Services
Transmission
System
Operator
Code
Performance Indicator
CSPI1
SAIDI
Weightage
(%)
50
CSPI2
25
CSPI3
25
TXPI1
TXPI2
TXPI3
System Minutes
System Availability
Project Delivery Index
100
40
30
30
100
SOPI1
25
SOPI2.1
25
SOPI2.2
25
SOPI3
Dispatch Adjusment
SBP1
SBPI2
Single Buyer
SBPI3
SBPI4
25
100
25
25
25
25
100
Note:
MSL: Minimum Service Level
GSL: Guaranteed Service Level
46
Business
Entities
Performance
Indicators
Note:
Status for: Incentives
Status
FY 2015
Status
49.66
min/year/cu
stomer
Incentive
54.95
min/year/cust
omer
Incentive
Average of MSL
Compliance
Performance
84.11% 94.11%
97.36%
Incentive
93.95%
Neutral
86.32% 95.5%
99.13%
Incentive
99.71%
Incentive
0.1328 min
Incentive
0.7741 min
Incentive
System Availability
99.04% 99.48%
99.11%
Neutral
99.73%
Incentive
0 5.47
months
-1.45 months
Incentive
1.38months
Incentive
System Minutes
Transmission
FY 2014
55 70
min/year/cust
omer
SAIDI
Customer
Services
Dead Band
Achievements
Neutral
Penalty
47
Business
Entities
Single Buyer
Performance Indicators
Dead Band
Dispatch Deviation
FY 2014
Status
FY 2015
Status
0% - 5%
-1.4%
Incentive
-2.5%
Incentive
99.55% 99.85%
100%
Incentive
100%
Incentive
Non-Compliance to Malaysian
Grid Code (MGC)
2 to 7
occurrences
0 occurrence
Incentive
0 occurrence
Incentive
2 occurrences
Neutral
4.5
occurrences
Neutral
System
Operations
Note:
Status for: Incentives
Achievements
2 to 7
occurrences
Less than 0
occurrence
0 occurrence
Incentive
0 occurrence
Incentive
90% - 96%
100%
Incentive
100%
Incentive
90% - 96%
100%
Incentive
100%
Incentive
Dispatch Adjustment
0.2% - 0.4%
0.0137%
Incentive
0.0156%
Incentive
Neutral
Penalty
48
Incentive
Neutral
An incentive is applicable if
actual performance is above the
upper bound target
No penalty or incentive is
applicable if actual
performance lies between the
lower and upper bound targets
Penalty
10
BE
Total Incentive
BE
Total Penalty
CS
+0.3% ARR
CS
-0.3% ARR
TX
+0.3% ARR
TX
-0.3% ARR
SO
+0.5% ARR
SO
-0.5% ARR
SB
+0.5% ARR
SB
-0.5% ARR
49
Disclaimer
All information contained herein are solely for the purpose of this presentation only and
cannot be used or referred to by any party for other purposes without prior written
consent from TNB. Information contained herein is the property of TNB and it is protected
and confidential information. TNB has exclusive copyright over the information and you
are prohibited from disseminating, distributing, copying, reproducing, using and /or
disclosing this information.
50
Thank You
51
Back Ups
53
Description
Lefthanded regulation
efficiency
No upside for operators
monitoring
More flexible, but
uncertain
1 Applies to controllable system costs that are not subject to market forces (i.e. excluding fuel price)
Source: McKinsey
54
1 Load Forecast
forms the basis
for other
forecasts in IBR
submission
Load Forecast
Tx
CS
SB (O)
SO
Joint Costs
Other parameters
2 RRM is used to
determine the
revenue
requirement for
all BEs and
average tariff
WACC x RAB
Opex
Depreciation
Tax payments
Efficiency carryover
Revenue
Requirement
Average Tariff
COS study
3 Tariff design to
Micro tariff design
and rebalancing
ensure revenue
recovery
Tariff Schedules
Customer segmentation
/profile study
Macro tariff
design
Marginal cost
International tariff
comparison
Impact study
55
(6th
Revised Timeline
IBR Council 25th Apr 2016)
End Feb 2016
Aug 2016
Aug 2016
Sep 2016
Mid-Sep 2016
JEKs Approval
Dec 2016
58
Capital Expenditure
RM billion
10.8
10.0
8.5
7.3
59
Generation
EAF,
%
Transmission
System Minutes,
minutes
2.5%
Distribution
SAIDI
minutes/customer/year
-20%
-37%
0.8
2011
2015
2011
2015
2011
2015
60
USD/MT
Benchmark coal
price set in Jan14
tariff revision
USD/MT
Jan Mar 14
Apr Jun 14
Jul Sep 14
Oct Dec 14 Jan Mar 15 Apr Jun 15 Jul Sep 15 Oct Dec 15 Jan Jun 16
61
RM/MT
271.25
RM/MT
259.85
256.73
250.36
248.18
241.07
236.24
237.19
226.30
Jan Mar 14
Base Fx
Actual Fx
Apr Jun 14
Jul Sep 14
224.55
Oct Dec 14 Jan Mar 15 Apr Jun 15 Jul Sep 15 Oct Dec 15 Jan Jun 16
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.2273
3.3096
3.2717
3.2468
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.3702
3.6304
3.6362
4.0560
4.2950
*Note:
1 - Exchange rate is: 1 USD to RM
Source: Single Buyer Department, TNB
62
Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) was below benchmark price since Q3 2015
Actual price billed by PETRONAS
Benchmark price in tariff
Revised price by PETRONAS1
RM/mmBTU
48.57
47.44
45.84
Benchmark LNG
price set in Jan14
tariff revision
Jul Sep 14
Oct Dec 14
Note:
1 As per letter from PETRONAS dated 11 September 2014.
2 As per letter from PETRONAS dated 9 October 2015.
63
Jul 15:
RM 1.5/mmBTU
increase
RM/mmBTU
Benchmark piped gas
price set in Jan14
tariff revision
18.20
16.70
15.20
Jun 11
Jan 14
Jul 15
Jan 16
Notes:
1.From Jan 2014, the regulated gas price is only applicable for gas consumption 1,000 mmscfd. Consumption beyond this will be priced at
64
Before IBR
After IBR
ICPT
Base
Tariff
Example:
Similar mechanism is adopted for Petrol/Diesel price setting
Managed Float Mechanism
Based on market prices
Monthly revision
65
RIG
2 : Define Implementation
Tariff Setting Framework
(2/2) (RIGs)
Regulatory
Guidelines
Revenue Cap
What it is
Advantage/s
Disadvantage/s
TNB Business
Entities
Price Cap
Actual Cost
Customer Services
Transmission
System Operations
Source : Electricity Tariff RIGs, Suruhanjaya Tenaga, Jan 2012
66
Electricity
Customers
Flow of
Funds
Electricity Tariff
Customer
Services
Generation
Tariff
Transmission
Tariff
Transmission
System
Operations
Tariff
System
Operations
Single Buyer
SLAs and merit
order dispatch
TNB Generation
Independent Power
Producer (IPPs)
Managed Market Model
67
Electricity Customers
Electricity Tariff
Distribution
(Customer Services)
Transmission Tariff
Single
Buyer
Tariff
Transmission
System
Ops Tariff
System Operations
Single Buyer*
SLAs and merit
order dispatch
TNB Generation
Others (RE, imp/exp etc)
68
Customer Services
Transmission
1 2
Market Controls Regulation
4 3
Self Regulation
70