Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2] Question:
Engineer accepts that he is of 40 lunar years, and for 31 [lunar?] years he remained as a Brailvi.
So the question is whether he believed in the articles of Shirk which The Followers of 'Ah:mad
Rad:a Barailvi believe.
If he believed [atleast one ] in them then this implies he was a Mushrik for 31 [lunar?] years.
But if he did not then his claim is false that he was a Barailvi.
Since if a person does not believe that Holy Prophet IS H:a:d:ir Va Na:z:ir [OMNIPRESENT] then
he Ceases to be a Barailvi.Since it is not possible to be a follower of 'Ah:mad Rad:a: of Bans
Baraili to deny the Omnipresence [H:-d:u:r Va N-z:u:r or H:-d:u:r Va Naz:ar] of Holy Prophet
[Peace Be Upon Him].
That is why we in general do not consider the followers of Kh:airabadi cult as Barailvi since the in
general deny this Barailic Belief Of Omnipresence of Ghairullah.
But what is about Engineer.
3] According to "Ali: Mirza: it is allowed to offer prayers behind all those people who fulfil the
followeing six conditions.
3.1] He believes in 'ALL-H as the only Deity.
3.2] He believes in Holy Prophet [PBUH].
3.3] He believes in the Finality Of Holy Prophet.
3.4] He believes in Qur'a:n as a Divine Revelation [and does not say Story of people of past].
3.5] In 'Ah:a:dith:
3.6] The day of Judgement [Qiya:mah].
Since according to "Ali: Mirza: :="If a person who believes in the above six believes if additionally
believes in any [Article Of] Shirk, he remains as a Muslim".
His Shirk cannot nullify his 'Isla:m and 'I:ma:n.
If this is assumed to be correct then any one who believes that any Ghairullah [who so ever the
Ghairullah may be] is Omnipresent [H:-d:u:r Va N-z:u:r] then the believer cannot be a Muslim.
Since "Ali: Mirza: of Jhelum claims this this belief is Kufr .
Although "Ali: Mirza: says that A Mushrik can be a Muslim and a Mu'min if he statisfies the
mensioned above conditions, but even Engineer "Ali: Mirza: does not have the courrage to say
that If a person who satisfy the mensioned above six conditions, and additionally believes in at
least one article of Kufr ,even then he is a Muslim and a Mu'min.
This means that "Ali: Mirza does accept that a Person can be Muslim and a Mushrik
simultaneously but "Ali: Mirza: does not accept that a Person cannot be Muslim and Kafir
simultaneously .
So in this case if according to "Ali: Mirza: Of Jhelum to believe that any Ghairullah is
Omnipresence is Kufr and not Shirk then all the followers of Maulavi Rad:a: of Bans Baraili
becomes Kafir ;since there is not a single follower of 'Ah:mad Rad:a: of Bans Baraili who rejects
this belief of Omnipresence of Ghairullah.
Even Ghula:m Rasu:l Sa"i:di: who is analoged to Saiyiduna: "Umar Bin "Abdul "Azi:z BY THE
ENGINER believed in the Omnipresence of Ghairullah.
So this is an inconsistency in the system of thought of Engineer "Ali: Mirza: .
4] "Ali Mirza: claims that a person whodeclares a person who believes in mensioned above six
believes is a Kh:a:rite. [Lecture#154]
He includes in Neo Kharjites Jama"atul Muslimi:n and the followers of Dr Mas"u:d "Uth:ma:ni.
But he did not say any thing about Zubair "Ali: Zai who declared a large number of Ahlussunnah as Ka:fir
though implicitly.
4] Engineer "Ali: Mirza: also tried to shew and to purport that those who fight with Kh:avarij under the
Khila:fah of Saiyiduna "Ali: enjoy those virtues which were not even enjoyed by Saiyiduna: 'Abu Bakr RD:
and Saiyiduna: "Umar RD: .
He misinterpreted these 'Ah:a:di:th: so that an audiance is inclined to believe that they are Afd:al then
Saiyiduna: 'Abu Bakr RD: and Saiyiduna "Umar RD:.
This is a great conspiracy.against Saiyiduna: 'Abu Bakr and Saiyiduna "Umar to decrease their status.
'Astaghfarullah.
The tradition that those who fight with Khavarij under the Khila:fah of Saiyiduna: "Ali: are the best of all
creation. This tradition does exclude Does Saiyiduna: 'Abu Bakr RD ETC.
5] "Ali: Mirza: says that the Sha:n of Nuzu:l is present in Qur'a:n. Some time it is found in S:a:h:i:h:
'Ah:a:dith:.
They are authorative and authentic. However "Ali: Mirza: just consider them as informations. This is a flaw
in this lecture.
6] According to "Ali Mirza: it is allowed to offer behind those who do not recite Fatih:ah behind 'Ima:m or do
not excercise Rafa" Yadain.
WE APPRECIATE THAT THIS IS A GOOD RETREAT ACT SINCE ONE MAY DIFFER FROM H:ANAFITES
YET CANNOT DECLARE THEM AS GHAIRU AHLISSUNNAH.
What is the point? Engineer "Ali: Mirza: did not condemn his former teacher Zubair "Ali
Zai.Since Zubair "Ali: Zai did not allowed to offer prayers behind Muqallidi:n. Also
Zubar 'Ali: Zai did not allowed to offer prayers behind a number of 'Ahlul H:adi:th: .
Can Engineer "Ali: Mirza say any thing about his former teacher Engineer "Ali: Mirza: namely Zubair "Ali: Zai
and his teacher "Allamah Badi:"uddi:n Rashidi?
Why he is so silent on him .
7] He said that THOSE WHO INSURRECT AGAINST Khulfa:' Ra:shidi:n are COMMITER of Bid"atul
Kubra:' .Actually he secretly tries to disgrace Siyiduna: Mu"aviah RD: .
The insurrection of Saiyiduma: Mu"aviah RD: and his Followers was an Error of 'Ijtiha:d and not an Act of
Major Heresy ['Al Bid"atul Kubra:] as claimed by "Ali: Mirza: in some of his Heretic lectures and is implied in
this lectue No:154. Silimarly the disgrace of Saiyidatuna: "A:'ishah RD: is also implied in this lecture.
Engineer "Ali: Mirza may apologize by saying that she did rejected her initial view.
So after rejection She cease to be Heretic.
The Proper Response is:=
Whether She rejected Her Initial View or not is immeterial. It was an error of 'Ijtih:ad. An error of 'Ijtiha:d is
nether Bid"atul Kubra [Major Heresy] Nor Bid"atulS: S:ughra: [Minor Heresy]..
No 'Ahlussunnah says such a thing and any one who say such a thing himself commits Bid"atul Kubra:.
This is a corrollary of Heresy of Extreme Literalism.
This extreme Literism is borrowed from Zubair "Ali Zai as it is well known that he was so literalist that he
even declared some 'Ahlul H:adi:th: Scholars as Non =Ahlul H:adi:th:.
But even he did not thought in his wildest imagination to declare Saiyidina: Mu"a:viah's Act as Bid"atul
Kubra:. Atleaast there is an 'ijma:" that it is not Bid"atul Kubra: .Thus one of several answers is that cases of
Saiyiduna: "A:'ishah and Saiyiduna:Mu"a:viah are the cases of Exception from the texts of traditions which
are presented by THE ENGINEER.
[Aproper Refutation of Engineer "Ali: Mirza: shall be presented 'Insha: 'ALL-H, in a seperate article].
8] Engineer "Ali: Mirza: actually does want to equate Khava:rij , Killers Of Saiyiduna: Mu"a:viah ,Followers,
Saiyiduna: "A:'ishah and Her Followers priot to rejection of their initial view. Na"u:dh:billah. It is clearly
implied from the lectures of "Ali Mirza: and particularly from the Lecture no 154.
This is a Great Heresy which implies that "Ali Mirza the man from Jhelum is the worst Heretic of All Times if
he is a Muslim.
9.1] He belives that The Killers of Saiyiduna: "Uth:ma:n RD: were Muslims yet they did
commit an error of Interpretation. In general he does not differentiate betwwen an interprtation which is an
error of 'Ijtiha:d and an Error that is a Heresy.
He thinks that it was allowed to offer prayers behind them.
But if so then What shal he say about the Killers Of Saiyiduna: H:usain RD:.
Is he allowing to offer prayers behind the Killer of Sayiduna: H:usain the the members of the army which
fought against Saiyiduna: H:usain RD: ?
IS HE GOING TO SAY THAT EVEN THEY COMMITED AN ERROR OF INTERPRETATION
After all the Killers of "Uth:ma:n RD: were worse then the Killers of H:usain RD:.
9.2]Engineer "Ali: Mirza: uses the term Yazi:diah for a number of 'Ahlul H:adi:th: scholars.
But he himself be called Mith:lu Qatil "Uth:ma:n since he does shew sympathy for them. If he was the right
to allege
that others are Yazidiah ,then others have a similar right to say that he is
the Manhaj of Killers of Saiyduna: "Uth:ma:n.
In this case it is very difficult to claim that any one who denies its Tava:tur is a Kafir.
Agreement of Shaikh 'Al Bani: and Zubair "Ali: Zai.
It Must be noted that if The two stated above persons agree that a report or tradition is Mutva:tir even then a
tradition cannot be declared as Mutva:tir.
Unfortunately Engineer "Ali: Mirza: who appearently does not declare Kh:ava:rij and some sub sects of
Rava:fid: as Ka:fir declare 'Ima:m 'Ibn Taimiah RH: as Kafir atleast for some period in his life, just becouse
Zubair "Ali: Zai and Shaikh: 'Al Ba:ni agree to disagree from him. We call it a Pseudo Tava:tur of Engineer
"Ali: Mirza:
This is the worst form of Heresy Engineered by the mind in the skull of the Engineer.
Discussion on the text of Tradition <<Man Cuntu Maula: ...........>>
NECESSITY OF INTERPRETATION
[Even if it is accepted that this tradition is Mut-va:tir it cannot be taken in its real meaning]
This tradition cannot be taken literally. Any Explanation or Commentary of the tradition that is based on the
literal meaning is incorrect. Since its interpretation is Necessary.
1]The word Maula: is used in the meaning of Beloved and not in the meanings of Chief
Executive , Master, Ruler, Orderer, Commander ,Supreme Authority, Lord, Prophet, Apostle, Substitute for
Prophet, 'Ima:m etc.
Even "Ali: Mirza: inspite of all his engineering tricks accepts it.
Even he means Cordial Friend [Literally he use the words Liver Friend instead of Cordial friend yet meaning
is the same].Also it may mean 'Cincere Friend' .
[Cordis =heart, or the heart]
The Prophetic Past Tense of this tradition cannot be taken. There fore the choice is reduced and only first
two meanings are the only candidates .
If the Literal meaning of the Text of the Tradition is taken then this means that Holy Prophet is saying for
those people of Whome He was a Maula relatively in Past from the time he was saying these words and
sentences. He was really silent for those persons of Whom he was Maula at the time he was uttering these
Holy Sentences and Words.
This implieth that if this meaning that is the Real Meaning is Taken then nothing canbe said for those
persons of whome he became Maula latter. As the word Kuntu is generally used to indicate Far Past and Not
Recent Past and the Boundaries of the Past is not defined it is impossible to identify these boundaries with
out any S:ah:i:h: Tradition.
So this tradition excludes a Number Of S:h:abah who embraced 'Isla:m Latter.
People like Rid:va:n "Ali: Nadvi [A Rafid:i in disguise] and Engineer "Ali: Mirza [ an other person on the
Manhaj (Way) of Rd:va:n "Ali: Nadvi:] discard this meaning ,saying that this meaning cannot be taken. But
what what is the proof to discard the real meaning. The proof presented by them is just their opinion
respective opinions which doesnot satisfy the conditions of validity. A meaning of the verb/word in past tense
cannot be taken in present or future tense with out a proper proof.
Althought due to the influance of Zubair "Ali: Zai ,Engineer "Ali: Mirza Purports to be a Literalist yet he does
interpret otherwise when he wants , and as a proof we present his lecture inwhich he interpret a tradition and
apply it on Abu Talib instead of the Father Of Holy Prophet. What does this proves: . Even he accepts the
Principle of Interpretation.
LISTEN TO HIS LECTURE #98
So if he accepts the Principle of Interpretation then he cannot reject the rights of others to interpret other
wise the literal meaning. But in regard to the tradition under discussion if he rejects the literal meaning then
his rejection is invalid with out a proper proof .
If it is invalid then any argument based on the basis of interpretation becometh incorrect and invalid as a
necessary implication.
If Engineer "Ali: Mirza: does interpret and takes the virtual meaning of Presentative Past tense then this is
an INTERPRETATION with Certainty. In this case any argument from the Interpreted Meaning which is
other than the Literal [i.e Uninterpreted] meaning becomes incorrect. Since once it is proved that the Text of
a Tradition even if it is Mutv:atir deserves to be interpreted other then its Real Meaning and Necessarily
requires an Interpretation, then NO ARGUMENTATION CAN BE MADE FROM THE INTERPRETED
MEANING THAT IS OTHER THAN THE REAL MEANING. Since either a Text of a Tradition whether it is
S:h:i:h: or Mutva:tir , is not in the Literal Meaning then it is Interpretable and If Interpretable then
no argumentation from the interpretable text of the tradition is valid , neither in the interpreted meaning of the
Text nor In the Real Meaning.
Since an INTERPRETABLE Text of a Tradition whether it is Mutva:tir or S:ah:h:ih: is not Argumentable.
We Present a dilemma in form of a conundrum, since is constitute a problematic case for our Engineer Of
Jhelum in which a difficult choice is presented between two alternatives, e that are equally undesirable in
their implications and consequences..
Either the claimed Mutva:tir Tradition is in the Literal Meaning or in the Interpreted Meaning.
If it is in the former meaning then any argument for those people who embraced 'Isla:m becometh incorrect
since the Text of Tradition is ABSOLUTELY silent fothe time which was present time at the time Holy Prophet
This result typically one that is unwelcome or unpleasant. Our beloved Engineer does have to Accept
responsibility for the negative result of his choice of reply.
Does he really accept that Saiyiduna" "Ali: was the Maula: of Himself.
For the sake of argument , let it be agreed that the Engineer from Jhelum does believe that Saiyiduna: :Ali:
was the Maula: Of Himself i.e Maula of His own self , since in the case if is reply is affirmative this result is
inevitable.
What what does this mean? The obsure result does not make any proper meaning /sense.
The result "Saiyiduna: "Ali: Is Maula: of Himself and His own Self cannot clearly expressed in explicit
words.It is Hard to make out any definite sense/meaning from this result. This result it self requires an
interpretation.
Once again what is the point. We again but it in form of a conundrum so that Engineer from Jhelum may try
to understand.
Can a Sentence of Holy Prophet implies such results and consequences????
If not then an other conundrum is as follow:=
If Sentences spoken by Holy Prophet cannot imply such results and consequences then any meaning or
sense chosen which do imply such inevitable results and consequences MUST BE WRONG AND
INCORRECT.
This is another inevitable result or consequence.
THE ALLEGATION OF MUTILATION OR TAH:RI:F [CORRUPTIPON/DISTORTION] IN THE TEXT OF
H:ADITH:
If it is supposed that there is a Distortion and Mutilation in the Text of a H:adi:th by some 'Ahlul Ha:di:th then
this may be an error of pen or printing or both. It may be a connivance from Rava:fid: in disguise like
Engineer "Ali: Mirza: and Rid:va:n "Ali: Nadvi: who was the ponier of the heretic Idea that Saiyiduna:
Mu"a:viah RD: was not the Ka:tib Of Vah:y.
[Astafhfarullay and Na"u:dhu Billah].
But this may be a Divine Avenge that they them selves accuse 'Ahlussunnah Deoband for Tah:ri:f of some
traditions .
They do not accept any Apology. In this case they must understand that they commit the same Error in case
of 'Ahlussunnah Deoband which "Ali: Mirza: Of Jhelum did commit against them.
Some time they do exceed the limit when they accuse Shaikh 'Al Hind RH: for Tah:ri:f in a Verse [Sentence]
of Qu'a:n.
If they can go to such extremes then it is very Natural that "Ali: Mirza of Jhelum can go to an extreme
against them. Giving the heretic his due This Man from Jhelum does have opened the eyes of some 'ahlul
H:adi:th: that they must not go to such extremes.
As for us we defend both 'Ahlul H:di:th and 'Ahlussunnah Deoband from such false allegations.
Any how we do say "Ali: Mirza: is taking benifits of internal disputes of 'Ahlussunnah, and the extrmists of
'Ahlul H:adi:th and 'Ahlussunnah Deoband.
We say for Sake Of 'ALL-H DO NOT BE AN EXTREMIST.
Summary:
The "ARABIC WORD KUNTU/ CUNTU means " I was" or more literally "I did be" and not
"I am" or "I do Be".
[It may be noted that Infinitive of Verb to be like Is,Are,Art,Be, Was, Were is " To Be".
The same verb Be is found in future indefinite sentences as Shall Be, Will Be and in sentences OF
DECEPTIVE AUXILARY VERBS like May be, Can be, Might Be, Could Be .
One may not neglect Would Be and Should Be etc. ]
CHALLANE TO ENGINEER "ALI: MIRZA:
"Ali: Mirza: of Jhelum Vaunts that in a debate the 'Ahlul H:adi:th: debater escaped from the debate.
Let this be supposed to be correct then the person who was the debater was not an expert in the FIELD OF
DISCUSSION AND DEBATE .
Mu"a:viah RD: is not better then Kh:ava:rij amd Kh:avarij are not worse then Him ['Al "Aya:dh: Billah Ta"a:la].
Some time he uses the tradition "Man Cuntu Maula...." for this purpose, and some time he uses an other
tradition " It is obligarory to follow the ways and traditions of Khufa:s Ra:shidi:n and Mahdiy:n.".
But he tries to misinterpret this tradition.
From this tradition he tries to purport and misguide that any one who insurerected against Saiyiduna: "Ali
was a trangressor accoerding to this tradition, a Heretic and a Fasiq.
What Mirza:'s lecture cannote is that even Saiyidah "A:'ishah RD: WAS a Transgressor in some part of her
life , until She repended and rejected her first view.
HIS
If according to Engineer "Ali Mirza Jhelumi ,Saiyiduna: "Ali opposed Saiyiduna: "Uthma:n on the issues
which are considered as errors the same objection of transgression is implied on Saiyiduna: "Ali according
to the inconsistent system Engineered by the engineer "Ali: Mirza of Jhelum.
Once again his cunning mind is:=
EITHER NOT CONSCIOUS OF IT OR CONSCIOUSLY MISGUIDE
ENGINEER'S AUDIANCES.
If this Engineer Engineers an other answer that Saiyiduna: "Ali: RD: neither opposed nor supported then this
is a silent agreement Saiyiduna: 'Uth:ma:n RD:.
Now if in his own period of Kh:la:fah he did not openly rejected his initial agreement explicitly this means he
was still agreeing with Saiyiduna: "Uth:ma:n. Thus Engineer "Ali: Mirza: does become a Great Heretic even
according to his own standard and system.
CONCLUSION
Engineer "Ali: Mirza: often accuse "Ulma:' that they multiply some modern
scholars by Zero, what what does he imself do????
He tries to Multiply all those who defend S:ah:a:bah by zero and he tries to divide Rafd: by Zero in order to
make it Infinity. In his attempt he has divided himself by INFINITY.
16]
Who are Kh:ulfa:' of Thirty Years:=
Engineer "Ali: Mirza includes only five persons in 3O Lunar years of Isla:m.
[One Lunar Year is generaly supposed to be of 354.37 days approximately. So Thirty Lunar years are equal
to 30*354.37=10631.1 days approximately. For Practical perpose a normal Lunar year is suppposed to be of
354 days and a leap lunar Year is supposed to be of 355 days. How ever it is almost certain that no Lunar
year is of 353 days or 356 days.]
He excludes Saiyiduna: Mu"aviah RD:.
They are as follow:=
1] Saiyiduna 'ABU BACR
2Saiyiduna ] "UMAR
3Saiyiduna ] "UTH:MA:N
4] Saiyiduna "ALI:
5] Saiyiduna HASAN
But there are some problems in the list.
1] Saiyiduna: "Umar Bin "Abdul "Azi:z has been excluded from the list.
He is the fifth Ra:shid Khali:fah RH:
2] He Excuded Saiyiduna: MU"A:VIAH RD:who is the Khlifah among Mahdiyi:n .
There are two types of Kh:ulfa' 1] 'AR RASHIDU:N
2]'AL MAHDIYU:N.
Saiyiduna: Mu"aviah was in the latter type of Khulfa:' .
The age of 'AL Khulfa:' WHO ARE MAHDIYU:N did not ended after Thirty Years.
The tradition of Twelve Khulfa:' doeth imply that Some Kh:ulfa:' Shall exist after the period of Thirty Lunar
Years.
[It is assumed that the counting of year begin from the first day of Saiyiduna: 'Abu Bacr RD: the very first day
he assumed the Charge of Kha:lifatur Rasu:l RD:].
So the argument that the Noble Period of Khulfa:' 'Ar Ra:shidu:n ended exactly on the thirtieth Lunar year
needs an interpretation.
As Saiyiduna: Hasan RD: did resign from the post of Kh:alifah he is not included in the first five Caliphs.
Majority of 'Ahlussunnah even do not Include Saiyiduna: 'Abdullah Bin Zubair RD:in the list of Five Khulfa:
who are Rashidu:n.
Now every thing is clear. "Ali: Mirza: is using his own reasonings and declaring all those who reject his
heretic cconclusions as Nas:ibites.
Any how Saiyiduna: Mu"a:viah is among the Khulfa:' who are Mahdiyu:n ansd not in Rashidu:n.
How ever he may be consider as a Ra:shid Khali:fah in the literal meaning and
not in the termonological meaning. The dispute whether Saiyiduna: Mu"a:viah
RD: is in the Group of Kh:ulfa:' 'Ar Rashidu:n, is in the Termonological meaning of
the Compound Term and Not In the Literal Meaning of the very Term.
How ever he provides an a benifit of doubt that 'Ima: 'Ibn Taimiah might have rejected this belief.
According to us this Belief is not Kufr.
Engineer "Ali: Mirza: may try to declare us as Kafir for not accepting a Kufr as Kufr.
But there are certain problems which Engineer "Ali: Mirza: the Heretic mind of Jhelum has to
encounter.
If Zubair "Ali: Zai the former teacher of "Ali Mirza: did know this belief of 'Ima:m 'ibn Taimiah RH:
then he has no choice except to deslare 'Ima:m 'Ibn Taimiah RH: to declare him a Kafir.
Otherwise he himself becomes Kafir for not declaring a Belief of Kufr as a Kufr.
So in this case Zubair "Ali: Zai is implied to be a Kafir according to the system of thought of "Ali:
Mirza of Jhelum.
Now "Ali: Mirza Of Jhelum considers Zubair "Ali: Zai as a Muslim who did not declare 'Ima:m 'Ibn
Taimiah RH:as Kafir, Zubair "Ali: Zai is implied to be Not a Muslim in the inconsistent system of
deviant Engineer of Jhelum. Now if "Ali: Mirza: claims that His former Teacher Zubair "Ali: Zai is
Not a Muslim them "Ali: Mirza: Must accept that[Listen/See his Lecture#80] in which he claimed
that Zubair "Ali: Zai is a SPEAKER OF TRUTH [H:AQQ GO] is Incorrect and Wrong. What if
Engineer of Jhelum accepts that Zubair "Ali Zai is a Muslim?????
Engineer "Ali: Mirza: IS IMPLIED TO BE not a Muslim by HIS OWN STANDARD AND HIS
ENGINEERED SYSTEM. His Takfi:r turns back on him.This is a Paradox in his system.
The Heretic mind of this Engineer is unable to delect this paradox.
This is a Miracle of 'Ima:m 'Ibn Taimiah RH:.
Tkfi:r of Engineer turns back on him.
The circles is complete.
A POSSIBLE REPLY:=
Zubair "Ali Zai did not know this sentence and this belief of 'Ima:m 'Ibn Taimiah.
Reply to the possible reply.
This cannot be accepted since Zubair "Ali: Zai used to study all sorts of books and this belief
cannot escape his studies. This is impossible to accept.
AN OTHER POSSIBLE REPLY
Zubair "Ali: Zai did declare 'Ima:m 'Ibn Taimiah RH: as kafir but due to fear of strong opposition he
kept silent as Church's Mice.
Answer to second Possible Answer:
This cannot be accepted . Such a claim requires a proof. With out any proof nothing can be
accepted.
=========================================================================
=========================================================================
=========================================================================
=========================================================================
============================
[ ]
Muh:ammad Bin "Abi Bacr was very small when his Noble Father died.
Muh:ammad Bin 'Abi Bacr latter became a Heretic .
If he was not involed in the murder of Saiyiduna: "Uth:ma:n RD: directly he was involved indirectly.
So neither he can enjoy the benifit of doubt nor HE CAN ENJOY the benifit of being Son of Saiyiduna Abu
Bacr RD: .
Note:= Some Followers of the Rafid:i may have played a trick by commuting the last two letters of the Holy
Noun of Saiyiduna ;Abu Bakr RD: , AND in responce to this mischieve it is recommended to use C instead of
K.
NOTE:
DISCLAIMER