Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Summary
17 years old Malay gentleman presented with sudden colicky abdominal pain lasted about
1 day at right iliac fossa. It is associated with watery stool and slight abdominal masses at
right iliac fossa with palpation.
Introduction
a. Background of the study
Appendicitis is a common and urgent surgical illness with protean manifestation,
generous overlapping with other clinical syndrome. It is a significant morbidity, that
increases with diagnostic delay yet no single sign, symptom or diagnostic test can
accurately confirms the diagnosis of appendiceal inflammation in all cases.
Acute appendicitis remains one of the most common surgical diseases encountered by
physicians. When appendicitis manifests in its classic form, it is easily diagnosed and
treated. Unfortunately, these classic symptoms occur in just over half of patients with
acute appendicitis; therefore, an accurate and timely diagnosis of atypical appendicitis
remains clinically challenging and one of the most commonly missed problems in the
emergency department. Furthermore, the consequence of missing appendicitis, thus
leading to perforation, significantly increases morbidity and prolongs hospitalization
b. Rational and significance of choosing the case
It is a surgeons goal to evaluate a population of patient referred for suspected
appendicitis and to minimize negative appendectomy rate without increasing the rate of
perforation. Therefore, identifying the presentation remains a challenge.
By choosing this case, it may help the researcher to better understand the clinical
presentation of acute appendicitis acute appendicitis as we know remains one of the
most common surgical diseases. It may manifest in its classical form yet it can present
itself in many ways; atypical appendicitis. When the diagnosis is delayed the
consequences may lead to perforation.
In the long run, this case definitely will provide a better understanding on disease of
surgery; no just for acute appendicitis but also the other acute abdomen diseases;
cholecystitis, pancreatitis, intestinal obstruction, renal colic, etc.
History of admission
a. Patient biography
Name initials
Age
Sex
Religion
Civil status
Race
Occupation
Admission
Clerking
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
MR. NI
17 y/o
Male
Islam
Single
Malay
secondary school student
22/2/2009
22/2/2009
b. Chief complaint
Patient presented with right abdominal pain. The colicky pain was unbearable that he
asked to admit into the hospital
Review of system
system
finding
Cardiovascular
Endocrine
Gastrointestinal
As stated
Genitourinary
Hematopoietic
Musculoskeletal
Neurologic
Respiratory
b. Social history
Mr. NI was currently studying in final year of secondary school at Tumpat. He staying
with his mother she was working a food stall at Tumpat. His father was passed away
due to ischemic heart disease. He claimed to not smoke, do not sexually active and do not
drink alcohols.
c. Family history
He is the youngest of 6 siblings. Hi father passed away due to ischemic heart disease after
a long life with hypertension died at age of 54. Other than hypertension, he denies of
other family history of diabetes mellitus, malignancy, etc.
d. Allergy and medication history
Patient claimed had no known allergy to food or medication yet.
a. General
Patient appearance matches his description of age and race; 17 years old Malay
gentleman with light brown skin. His mental status was normal whereas he was alert.
Conscious time and place oriented, and comfortable. He was breathing normally and
able to communicate with the examiner. He was well nourished and fit; height 167 cm
and weight of 59 kg. His body mass index is 21.15kg/m2 ideal. His posture was normal
and no abnormal gait pattern can be seen.
Inspection of the hand revealed no clubbing, peripheral cyanosis or nicotine stain. No
swelling or tenderness of the wrist. No wasting of muscle or flapping tremor. The hand
was warm and dry. The radial pulse were palpable, beats per minute, it is regular rhythm
and good volume. There was no radio-radial delay or radio-femoral delay and there was
also no collapsing pulse.
Examination of the eye shows no sign of ptosis, constricted pupil and loss of sweating.
No jaundice noted on the sclera and the conjunctiva was not pale. The tongue was moist
and no central cyanosis seen. Oral hygiene was good.
Hi vital signs were as recorded;
Blood pressure
Heart rate
Respiratory rate
Temperature
:
:
:
:
122/76 mmHg
86 beat per minute
26 breaths per minute
37C
Palpation
Percussion
Dullness along the cardiac border
Auscultation
c. Respiratory assessment
Inspection
Palpation
Percussion
Auscultation
d. Abdominal assessment
Inspection
Palpation
Percussion
Auscultation
e. Musculoskeletal examination
Generally, muscle size and side comparison appears normal. Muscle tone and strength
also appears normal. Joints can be moved well and no pain noticed.
Impression: no remarkable findings
f. Nervous examination
Patient was alert and conscious. No slurred speech or abnormal behaviour. He is well
oriented to time, place and person. No cerebellar signs present nystagmus, past-pointing.
Gait was stable
Impression: unremarkable findings
Summary
17 years old Malay gentleman presented with abdominal pain lasted about 1 day at right
iliac fossa. It is associated with watery stool and slight abdominal masses at right iliac
fossa with palpation.
Provisional diagnosis
Acute appendicitis
Patient presented with symptom of acute colicky abdominal pain at right iliac fossa. From
the history taking, patient also claimed experiencing similar pain a week prior to the
second episode; the first episode were associated with right iliac fossa pain, fever, loss of
appetite, nausea and vomiting classical symptoms for acute appendicitis.
Physical examination and assessment revealed that the patient had mild guarding of the
abdomen and have an appendicular mass palpable at the right iliac fossa. Patient was
positive for Rovsigs sign. There is no tenderness or any other reflex suggestive for other
diseases.
Differential diagnosis
Diagnosis
Cholecystitis
Positive relevant
Nausea vomiting, fever,
abdominal pain may
radiated, spontaneous
resolves, etc.
Constipation
Renal calculi
Negative relevant
Relieved by move around
appendicitis patient usually
bed-rest, precipitate with
fatty meal, positive
murphys sign
No fever, constipation
associated with painful
bowel movement, duration
of symptom lasted longer.
No Nausea vomiting, bowel
movement remains, no loss
of appetite
Investigation
Investigation
Urinalysis
Serum amylase
Reason to support
The total white cell count is raised above normal in 85% of
patients and three quarters have an abnormal differential
white cell count, having more than 75% neutrophils.
Only 4% of patients with appendicitis have both a normal
white cell count and a normal Neutrophil count.
The white cell count, however, is raised in many other
conditions, so although highly sensitive, it has poor
specificity for appendicitis.
To exclude severe urinary tract infections, but an increase
in the numbers of leucocytes and bacteria is often seen in
acute appendicitis.
To rule out pancreatitis specific test to diagnose
pancreatitis by serum amylase level elevation more than
10u/dL
Result
Interpretation
Normal range
17.9
High
4.5-13.5
x 109 /L
RBC
5.1
Normal
4.0-5.4
x 1012 /L
Hb
13.1
Normal
11.5-14.5
g/dL
HCT
38.8
Normal
37.0-45.0
Ratio
MCV
77.5
Normal
76.0-92.0
fL
MCH
25.5
Normal
24.0-30.0
Pg
MCHC
30.8
Normal
28.0-33.0
g/dL
Platelet
240
Normal
150-400
109 /L
High
40.0-75.0
2.9-7.9
20.0-45.0
1.8-4.0
2.0-10.0
0.2-0.8
0.0-5.0
0.04-0.44
0.0-2.0
0.0-0.2
%
109/L
%
109/L
%
109/L
%
109/L
%
109/L
76.3
13.7
Lymphocyte 21.0
3.8
2.1
Monocyte
0.38
0.3
Eosinophil
0.05
0.2
Basophil
0.04
Neutrophil
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Impression: white blood cell and neutrophil are elevated. The elevation might be due to
the inflammatory reaction of the body. As mentioned, 85% of patient with appendicitis
presented with an increased in white blood count, neutrophil. []
Serum amylase
Patient result was 6.9 u/dL
Impression: no significant findings. It is not pancreatitis
Urinalysis
Blood
Result
Interpretation
Normal range
1.030
normal
1.003-1.030
g/mL
850
Normal
>800
mOsm/kg
Urobilinogen
0.8
Normal
0.2-1.0
Mg/dL
Erythrocytes
Normal
<2-3
RBC cast
Nil
Normal
Nil
Leukocytes
Nil
Normal
Nil
pH
Normal
5-7
Protein
Normal
Trace
Glucose
Nil
normal
Nil
Ketones
Nil
Normal
Nil
Bilirubin
Nil
Normal
Nil
Blood
Nil
Normal
Nil
Nitrite
Nil
Normal
Nil
Na
180
normal
150-300
mmol/H
50
Normal
40-90
mmol/H
Ca
3.4
Normal
2.5-8.0
mmol/H
19
Normal
<38
mmol/H
Creatinine
7.3
Normal
4.8-19
mmol/H
Count
Specific
gravity
Osmolality
Per high
field
power
Final diagnosis
Acute appendicitis
1) Based on history, Mr. NI presented with sudden colicky abdominal pain at right iliac
fossa for a day before it resolved gradually. The pain was associated with watery
stool. From the history as well, he claimed to have the same abdominal pain a week
before with association of fever, nausea vomiting, loss of appetite, and abdominal
tenderness
2) Based on assessment, patient presented mild guarding at the right iliac fossa. Upon
deep palpation, it revealed that there was an appendicular mass noted at right iliac
fossa region approximately at area of ileocaecal junction. Rovsigs sign
demonstrated and it was positive.
3) Full blood count revealed a slight elevation of white blood count and neutrophil
inflammatory markers. The urinalysis shows no unremarkable findings this serve to
rule out any genitourinary factors.
Principal management
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
Discussion
Acute appendicitis remains as one of the most common surgical diseases encountered by
physicians. The diagnosis of acute appendicitis is predominantly a clinical. Classical
presentation of acute appendicitis includes, epigastric or periumbilical pain followed by
brief nausea, vomiting, and anorexia; after a few hours, the pain shifts to the right lower
quadrant. Association with low grade fever is very common.
The etiology of appendicitis is likely that luminal obstruction by external (lymphoid
hyperplasia) or internal (inspissated fecal material, appendicoliths) compression that
leads to increased mucus production, bacterial overgrowth, and stasis, which increase
appendiceal wall tension. Consequently, blood and lymph flow is diminished, and
necrosis and perforation follow.
In this case, patient presented with abdominal pain lasted more than 24 hour before
admitted into the ward. It is not radiating to or from umbilical fossa, the pain is not
migrating and gradually resolving. The pain accompanied with fever and abdomen
tenderness. This is in fact classical presentations of acute appendicitis. However, as
mentioned in study by Humes et al1 suggested that patient with a delayed presentation
may present itself with palpable mass can be confirmed on ultrasonography or computer
tomography scan.
A study done by Blomqvist et al3 in Sweden shows that in most cases the mass will
decrease in size over the subsequent days as the inflammation resolves, although patients
need careful observation to detect early signs of progress of the inflammatory process. As
appendicitis can recur, management after resolution of the mass is usually an interval
appendicectomy; a conservative approach with outpatient follow-up has been suggested,
but no definitive evidence exists to support this.
Conclusion
Appendicitis is inflammation of vermiform appendix whereas patient presented with
abdominal pain migrating from periumbilical or epigastric to right iliac fossa, associated
with fever, nausea vomiting, anorexia, and abdominal tenderness . The gold-standard
treatment for appendicitis is appendicectomy or conservative treatment depending on
the presentation of the patient.
References
1. Humes D.J, Simpson J. Clinical Review: acute appendicitis. BMJ 2006;333:5304
2. Campbell MR, Johnston SL III, Marshburn T, et al. Nonoperative treatment of
suspected appendicitis in remote medical care environments: implications for future
spaceflight medical care. J Am Coll Surg. 2004;198:822 830.
3. Blomqvist PG, Andersson RE, Granath F, Lambe MP, Ekbom AR. Mortality after
appendectomy in Sweden, 1987-1996. Ann Surg 2001;233:455- 60.