Acoustic Testing of Tubes

25/10/2016
Home
TheNextGenerationofHeatExchangerInspection:UsingAcousticPulseReflectometry|Sensors
News
Resource Center
Electronics & Computers
Technical Articles
Embedded Systems
About Sensors
Internet of Things
Advertise
Machine Manufacturing
Browse by Topic
Process Industries
Sensors Expo
Specialty Markets
Wireless & M2M
Home > Sensors Products > Acoustic/Ultrasound

Related topics: Acoustic/Ultrasound,Feature, Machine Manufacturing, Predictive Maintenance, Process Automation, Process Industries, Sensors At Work,
Technologies in Depth, Utilities
Email Newsletters
White Paper Library
Sensors Job Board
Most Read Articles

A Dozen Ways to Measure
Fluid Level and How They
Work
Fundamentals of Pressure
Sensor Technology
Manometer Basics
The Basics of Rotameters
The Principles of Level
Measurement
Editors Picks
NEWS
New Technology Brings
Password Transmission
Through Skin
NEWS
Global Demand to Skyrocket
for IoT Devices -- Will
Businesses Keep Up?
NEWS
Zebra Technologies, Bosch
Connected Devices and
Solutions and ARM
Collaborate on EnterpriseClass Food Safety Solution to
Better Protect Consumers
NEWS
Fitness Wearable Tech
Startup Actofit Launches its
Much-awaited gym Fitness
Tracker
ARTICLE
New Sensor Technologies
Acoustic/Ultrasound
The Next Generation of Heat Exchanger Inspection: Using
Acoustic Pulse Reflectometry
October 1, 2010
By: Dr.NoamAmir,AcousticEyeInc.
Sensors
Acoustic pulse reflectometry enables rapid, comprehensive inspections of

heat exchanger tubes, identifying fouling, leaks, corrosion, and other
critical faults.
Heat exchangers (HXs) are devices used to transfer heat from one fluid to another. Most commonly, HXs are
constructed of hundreds to thousands of tubes in parallel, encased in a metal shell. One fluid is found inside the
tubes, and another fluid on the outside, enclosed by the shell. A very common example for the use of HXs is in
fossil-fueled power plants, where they cool and condense steam (on the shell side) by pumping cooling water, such
as sea, lake, or river water, through the tubes. Another example is geothermal power plants, where naturally
heated water is pumped from the ground and then passed through a HX to heat an organic compound such as
isobutane. The isobutane drives the electricity-generating turbines and is then condensed in a second HX. The
second HX most often has finned tubes which are air-cooled using large fans. In general, HXs are found in a large
variety of industries such as power plants, refineries, paper mills, HVAC, food and beverage, and chemical.
Depending on the application, many different types of fluids are used in the HXs; some of these fluids are corrosive
to various degrees.
Operating 24/7 over long periods, HXs are subject to eventual degradation or failure through many mechanisms,
including erosion, corrosion, abrasion (caused by support plates rubbing against the tubes), thermal shock,
sedimentation, and fouling. Plant operators are aware of these inevitable issues and thus inspect their HXs
periodically, both to ensure their efficiency and to prevent catastrophic failures.
Inspection of HXs usually requires stopping production in an entire plant, which is costly. Such stoppages, called
turnarounds, are often used to carry out maintenance across the plant in addition to HXs, with conflicting
requirements of carrying out as thorough an inspection as possible, in as short a time as possible. This conflict is
usually resolved through "sampling," a process that examines a certain representative portion of the tubes in any
given HX. The portion is typically 8%10% of the total number of tubes in the HX, though this figure can vary
depending on several factors such as cost of inspection, cost of failure, and tube condition. This is a problematic
compromise, because leaving a single tube with a bad defect untested can later cause a catastrophic failure,
rendering the entire inspection useless.
This article discusses the current methods used to examine HX tubes and introduces the AcousticEye Dolphin
system that uses acoustic pulse reflectometry to examine tubes comprehensively and quickly.
Heat Exchanger Maintenance and Typical Faults
HXs have been used for many years, and an entire industry has risen around their maintenance, inspection, and
repair. During a typical turnaround, HXs are first cleaned to remove sediments, deposits, and corrosion. This can be
a difficult process because some types of deposits are hard to remove and a large number of tubes must be
cleaned in a short time. Following cleaning, the individual tubes are inspected. Tubes identified as faulty are then
http://www.sensorsmag.com/sensors/acousticultrasound/thenextgenerationheatexchangerinspectionusingacoustic7589
1/8
25/10/2016
Accelerate Robot Evolution
plugged, since HXs have a degree of built-in redundancy, and can therefore function satisfactorily even with a
certain percentage (up to about 10%) of its tubes plugged.
The most basic fault that can be found in HXs is fouling, which may not be catastrophic but can considerably impair
the efficiency of the HX. Fouling is addressed during the cleaning process, although different methods of cleaning
can yield different results. Scale, for example, is particularly difficult to remove. One interesting method of
removing scale entails shooting darts through the tubes to first score the scale and then to scrape it out.
Two additional types of faults are the main concern of operators: leaks and wall loss. Leaksthough rarecan
impair a HX's functioning seriously, if not catastrophically. Happily, tubes with advanced wall loss can usually be
identified and plugged before they develop leaks. Wall loss is commonly measured as a percentage of wall
thickness and can be caused by different mechanisms, causing different fault morphologies. Erosion, for instance,
might cause gradual thinning over a large part of the tube circumference, whereas localized corrosion could create
small, deep pits.
Current Inspection Methods
Over the decades that HXs have been in use, several different inspection methods have gained popularity. These
methods are part of the field known as Nondestructive Testing (NDT). The most well known method is eddy current
testing (ET) where a probe is physically pushed through each tube and pulled back. The probe contains one or
several coils, whose electrical impedance is affected by the surrounding tube. Different configurations of coils and
driving frequencies can be used to detect various flaws and to distinguish whether they are on the external or
internal surface of the tubes. While ET is relatively accurate, it can be used only on nonferrous metals such as brass
or copper-nickel. Several different variants of ET are available for ferrous metals, although they are all slower and
less accurate than classic ET.
Another well-known NDT method is based on ultrasound in which a wave is sent through a medium and any
reflections caused by discontinuities in the medium are recorded. Adapting this method to tube inspection is quite
involved: a probe is sent down the tube; the probe emits an ultrasonic beam parallel to the tube axis that then hits
a spinning 45 mirror. As the probe moves down the tube it scans the tube wall in a spiral. This method is known as
internal rotating inspection system (IRIS). When using IRIS, the tubes to be inspected must be filled with water,
which acts as a coupling medium, similar to the coupling gel used by a physician when carrying out a medical
ultrasound examination.
Problems with Current Methods
Ideal NDT methodsfast, accurate, independent of tube material, and completely objectiveare very hard to
come by, and HX inspection is no exception. The different methods listed earlier score differently on each of the
above points but none of them are perfect.
ET and variants. Basic ET is relatively accurate, with the ability to inspect from 3060 tubes per hour, depending
somewhat on their length and condition. Deposits in the tube can cause probes to become stuck, which can hold
up the inspection and even damage probes. ET is also heavily dependent on the tube wall material, which is a
twofold limitation: it cannot be used to inspect ferromagnetic materials at all, and requires a calibration standard
(segments of tubing with carefully manufactured faults, used to calibrate ET equipment before every inspection) for
any tube it can be used on. Because a different calibration standard has to be used for every type of material, tube
diameter, and wall thickness, ET users have to stock tens to hundreds of such standards, at a very high cost.
ET variants such as full/partial saturation eddy current (FSEC/PSEC), remote field testing (RFT), and magnetic flux
leakage testing (MFLT) have further drawbacks. Although they can be used for ferromagnetic materials, these
methods are generally slower than ET and less accurate.
Finally, ET results depend heavily on subjective interpretation by the technician. A study conducted by MTI and
EPRI, for example, showed that a skilled technician detected 87% of the faults in a HX mockup, whereas another
technician detected only 50% of the faults on the same tubes.
IRIS. IRIS, though in some cases accurate, has other problems. The need for good resolution dictates a narrow
ultrasonic beam, which in turn entails a very slow pull rate to ensure that the spiral scan of the tube provides full
coverage. Filling the tubes with water without air bubbles is messy and time-consuming. IRIS also requires that the
tubes be cleaned down to the metal, which is another time-consuming and costly procedure that must take place
before inspection even begins. Finally, the accuracy of IRIS decreases as the tube walls get thinner, and it cannot be
used on tubes with a wall thickness of <0.9 mm. The same MTI report quoted earlier showed that in certain cases
IRIS detected <30% of the flaws in an EPRI heat exchanger mockup with known faults.
APRA New Approach
Given the drawbacks of existing methods, today it is rare to find plants in which 100% of HX tubes are regularly
inspected, leaving room for critical failures. Therefore it is not surprising that engineers are constantly searching to
improve on these methods, especially concerning the inspection/analysis speed. AcousticEye has recently brought
to the market one such promising technology based on acoustic pulse reflectometry (APR). While APR has been
used in academic research labs for several decades, it has only recently emerged as a usable industrial tool. So how
does it work?
APR basics. Imagine an acoustic pulse traveling through the air enclosed within a long tube. As long as the pulse
does not encounter any changes in the tube cross section, the pulse continues to propagate, with some
attenuation due mainly to friction between the molecules of air and the tube wall. If a discontinuity is encountered,
reflected waves are created, which propagate back up the tube. The more abrupt the changes in cross section, the
stronger these reflections will be. Recording and analyzing these reflections to determine what kind of discontinuity
caused them enables this technique to be applied to tube inspection.
2/8
25/10/2016
What's in a reflection? From the point of view of a pulse traveling down a tube, three basic changes in cross section
can occur: a reduction in cross section caused, for example, by some kind of blockage; an increase in cross section,
caused by wall loss or bulges; and a through hole. Importantly, the reflections caused by these three cross-section
alterations are very different from each other. Figure 1 shows a schematic representation of the reflections caused
by each kind of fault. Clearly, the reflection from an increase in cross section is very different from a reflection from
a decrease in cross section, and both are different from the reflection caused by a hole. These reflections can be
referred to as the signatures of the different types of faults. The signatures in Figure 1 are oversimplified, whereas
Figure 2 shows some actual lab measurements. Real-life signals are noisier and less uniform than theory might lead
us to believe, although the main features shown in Figure 1 are found in Figure 2 as well. The acoustic pulse acts
essentially as a virtual probe; it travels up the tube and returns signals that report on the tube's internal condition.
It differs, however, in two significant ways: it cannot get stuck and it operates at the speed of sound.
Figure1.Varioustypesoffaultscausedifferenttypesofreflections
Figure2.Labmeasurementscomparingreferencepulsestofaultsignatures
Applying APRFrom Science to Technology

There are plenty of obstacles to be overcome when translating the general idea we've outlined into an industrial
tool. The entire process of creating a pulse and measuring the reflections must be performed in as short a time as
possible, in a process that can be repeated reliably many thousands of times. The general block diagram of such a
system is outlined in Figure 3. A controller, preferably a computer, creates a pulse in software and outputs it to a
D/A card, which drives a power amplifier. The amplifier drives a loudspeaker, which creates an acoustic pulse in the
tube being inspected. The various waves propagating in the tube are recorded by a microphone, after which they
are digitized by an A/D card and stored in the computer. The digital signals must be processed by software to
interpret and classify them into various types of faults as well as to quantify them.
3/8
25/10/2016
Figure3.Blockdiagramofthepulsecreationandmeasurementsystem
Each stage in the process presents unique challenges at the hardware and software levels. Addressing them
correctly distinguishes a useful tool from just another nice idea.
The fight against noise. The main challenge in applying APR is to get a high signal to noise ratio (SNR), since
reflections from small faults can get lost in ever-present background noise. The stronger the initial pulse, the
stronger the reflections, yet there are limitations as to how strong a pulse can be created. The output voltage of the
amplifier cannot be increased beyond practical limits, and even if it could, loudspeakers are limited with respect to
the maximum voltage that can be used to drive them. In fact, long before dangerous power levels are achieved,
most loudspeakers begin to distort the signal until it becomes unusable. One approach to increasing SNR is to
conduct the same measurement hundreds or even thousands of times, and average the results. This strengthens
the signal while averaging out the noise. However, this process is unacceptably time-consuming.
An evolution of this method is to use pseudonoise. By sending a seemingly random but carefully crafted signal, we
can obtain the same effect but in a far shorter period of time. One such signal is known as the maximum length
sequence (MLS), used also in measurements of room acoustics. When every component, including the amplifier,
loudspeaker, microphone, and A/D and D/A circuitry is carefully selected, we can achieve very high SNR levelsup
to 120 dB.
Good reflections vs. bad: calibration. Any practical tool that has to fit a range of tube sizes and configurations must
have fittings and adapters that, by necessity, create discontinuities in the system. These create reflections that are
spurious, in the sense that they do not represent faults. The larger the discontinuities, the stronger these spurious
reflections, which can easily mask reflections caused by small faults. The best way to overcome these is to carry out
a calibration measurement on a good tube and then subtract this measurement from measurements taken on the
inspected tubes. However, when inspecting a 20-year-old HX, it is rare to find a representative tube in pristine
condition. A viable and innovative alternative developed by AcousticEye is to carry out measurements on a large
number of tubes, and average these measurements to obtain a form of virtual calibration measurement. In
practice this approach works well and, in addition, the standard deviation of these measurements gives an idea of
the level of background noise. This can give a "noise sleeve" (as shown in Figure 4), with the upper and lower
thresholds indicating that any fluctuations within this sleeve represent noise, while fluctuations beyond it signify a
fault.
4/8
25/10/2016
Figure4.Everythingbetweentheupperandlowerboundsofthe"noisesleeve"representsnoisewhilesignalsextending
beyondthesleevesignifyfaults
Analyzing the signals. Obtaining clean measurements is one part of the equation, but analyzing these
measurements to find indications of faults is also important. Although in many NDT methods this is left to the
technician, human interpretation is slow, error-prone, and highly dependent on the technician's proficiency.
Applying APR correctly, the range of known possible faults can be simulated and compared to the actual
measurements. With the proper on-screen presentation this can aid the human interpretation process as well as
advance towards automatic interpretation, speeding up the analysis by an order of magnitude and turning it into
an objective rather than subjective process. This is one of the main thrusts of the AcousticEye system,
differentiating it from most other NDT systems. Figure 5 shows an example of thresholds for identifying blockage
and wall loss, with a signal that cuts the wall loss threshold by 20%.
Figure5.Examplethresholdsforidentifyingblockagesandtubewallloss
Streamlining the Technology: Usability

The technology for inspecting a single tube is important in itself. However, a typical HX can contain thousands of
tubes; therefore, saving even several seconds on each tube measurement can translate into an overall time savings
of several hours over the whole inspection. Also, carrying out the measurements is a tedious and monotonous
process, leading to errors in keeping track of the tubes being measured and resulting in discrepancies between the
tube numbering described in the final report and the actual tubes measured. Periodically verifying that no such
discrepancies are occurring is another factor holding back the inspection. It is therefore crucial that the supporting
software that steps the technician through the whole process should be as streamlined and easy to use as possible,
giving clear visual indications of what tube needs to be measured next. A segment of a screenshot taken from the
AcousticEye software is given in Figure 6, in which the tube ends are clearly marked and numbered on a photo of
the HX, with the next tube to be measured highlighted in red. At a glance, the technician can verify that the
locations of the probe in the software and on the physical HX are in sync.
5/8
25/10/2016
Log in
Search
Print
Email
Figure6.Ascreenshotshowingthevarioustubes,andidentifyingthenexttubetobechecked
Clean Thy Tubes

Tube cleaning is a painful and somewhat controversial issue in HX inspection and maintenance. Depending on the
operating environment, HX tubes can be fouled by a plethora of mechanisms, such as various forms of sludge,
sediments and deposits, scale, and even shellfish. Cleaning out the tubes can be costly, time-consuming, and in
some cases quite difficult. The approach to cleaning tubes during turnarounds varies greatly among operators. On
the one hand, deposits such as scale create a thermal and physical barrier in the tubes, reducing the overall
efficiency of the HX, and therefore it is often in the interest of the operator to clean the tubes. However, this
process is often perceived as necessary to the inspection process, rather than for correct operation of the HX.
Regardless, the cleaning process is very hard to control; up to now, no easy method existed for comparing tube
condition before and after cleaning.
APR, in contrast to the other technologies, does not require tubes to be cleaned before they are measured.
Measuring a dirty tube will simply give strong indications of partial blockages along the tube, which then can be
compared to measurements taken after cleaning. Figure 7 presents an example of such a comparison, showing the
effectiveness of the cleaning. Thus, APR is a viable tool for quality control of tube cleaning in addition to detecting
defects.
6/8
25/10/2016
Log in
Print
Search
Email
Figure7.Comparisonofmeasurementresultsfortubebeforecleaning(uppergraph)andaftercleaning(lowergraph)
Summary
Worldwide, companies involved in many different industries are adopting APR for HX tube inspection. The
AcousticEye Dolphin inspection system, using the company's proprietary APR technology, offers ease of use, tube
measurements in as little as 9 s per tube, and objective accuracy. This means that companies no longer need to
accept the risks that come with sampling.
There are billions of tubes and pipes throughout the world that require effective inspection to ensure safety,
efficiency, and reliability, and until now it has been nearly impossible to achieve 100% inspection coverage. As APR's
potential is applied to efficiently and effectively examining a larger variety of types of tubes and pipes, we expect
that companies will be able to prevent many critical failures and avoid serious catastrophes by performing
comprehensive inspection and maintenance that has not previously been possible.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Dr. Noam Amir is CTO of AcousticEye Inc., Santa Clara, CA. He can be reached at 888-874-4779,
noam@acousticeye.com.
About the Author: Dr. Noam Amir

About Dr. Noam Amir
Articles by Dr. Noam Amir
Bookmarkit:
digg
del.icio.us
technorati
yahoo
facebook
twitter
Add Comment
7/8
25/10/2016
Log in
Search
Quick Links
Twitter Feed
Tweetsby@sensorsonline
Home
Subscribe
News
Opinion
Technical Articles
About Sensors
Browse by Topic
Advertise
Media Kit
Sensors Expo
Contributor/Advertiser
Toolkit
Print
Email
Find It Fix It Forum

Sensors invites you to join the Findit-Fixit
Forum, where you can get answers to your
sensing questionsconcerning
technologies, products, methods,
applications, and services--and also offer
help to your fellow engineers. The Forum
covers all kinds of topics, from the basics
to the extraordinary.
Join the discussion!
Copyright 2016 Questex, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Sensorsmag. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use
If you are having technical difficulties or considerations, please contact the webmaster.
8/8

Acoustic Testing of Tubes

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Acoustic Testing of Tubes

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

25/10/2016

Electronics & Computers

Wireless & M2M

Home > Sensors Products > Acoustic/Ultrasound

Most Read Articles

Acoustic pulse reflectometry enables rapid, comprehensive inspections of

Applying APRFrom Science to Technology

Streamlining the Technology: Usability

Clean Thy Tubes

About the Author: Dr. Noam Amir

Find It Fix It Forum

You might also like