Topic: Death penalty Country: Federative Republic of Brazil Delegate: Death penalty, also referred to as capital punishment, is the most controversial subject in the world regarding the way criminals should be punished. Capital punishment has, in the past, been practised by most societies, as a punishment for criminals, and political or religious dissidents. As Article 3 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights states that Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person, nowadays the death penalty is widely considered to be an inhumane procedure. According to Article 5, XLVII, a, of Brazils Federal Constitution, there shall be no punishment of death, save in case of declared war under the terms of article 84, XIX. Capital punishment is a long unused form of punishment in Brazil, last reported in 1876, not having been officially used since the proclamation of the Republic in 1889. Despite the fact that opinion polls among the general public in Brazil have shown throughout the 21th century thus far that the ayes have it, the Federative Republic of Brazil believes that capital punishment is a crime against humanity and under no circumstances should it be used, but in singular situations during wartime. Being among the first countries to abolish this form of punishment, the Federative Republic of Brazil considers that there should be an extensive movement towards death penaltys drawing to an end worldwide. As there are several cases of criminals sentenced to death yearly, a good deal of wrongful executions might happen and have happened since capital punishment came into force. Moreover, there have been a few executions by lethal injection in which the convicted person has been administered a wrong proportion of drugs and has been harshly left to die in agony. In fact, these mishandlings violate Article 5 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which states that No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. As the existing nations have different opinions regarding this method of punishment, it is clear that the heads of countries cannot reach an understanding for the time being. Despite the fact that it may not seem as important as it really is, each and every nation claims sovereignty and conflicts can easily arise between states. For instance, a Brazilian was arrested in 2003 for drug trafficking and sentenced to death. This happened again in 2013, and the smuggler is now on death row. This action incurred Brazil governments wrath and it can have disastrous consequences in the foreseeable future. Thus, the Federative Republic of Brazil strongly believes that the world desperately needs to settle upon a consent, as death penalty causes severe damage to diplomatic relations between nations.